李老師が$LIコインを発行するのはネギを刈る行為か？中国共産党のやり方と比較する
Regarding the issue of netizens accusing Teacher Li of "cutting leeks" (scamming), I want to ask, have these people bought $LI? If you haven't even bought it, why are you shouting about cutting leeks? Those who bought it haven't even spoken yet. What does "cutting leeks" mean? You need to look at how the CCP operates, whether it uses official media or even policies to hype things up and lure the masses into the market? I see Teacher Li's focus has always been on the future management and use of $LI, and he hasn't said anything like "buy coins to get rich," "big rise in the future," or "upward trend unchanged" – the rhetoric of cutting leeks. It is evident that Teacher Li has not made any statements to lure readers into speculating on coins, and can be said to be as rigorous as possible. If this is also called cutting leeks, then what should the CCP be called?
Below are some positive comments about Teacher Li's coin issuance event that I saw online, hoping to provide a different perspective and food for thought for those who oppose it.
Pathfinder: **
Chinese people in any circle just like to worship the victor and denigrate the vanquished. Teacher Li is not powerful enough now, so he is "cutting leeks." Sun Wen succeeded in his revolution, so he is a great national hero? Everyone knows about the Red Boat in Jiaxing, right? Did the people on the Red Boat know that they would achieve so much later? Did they know they would definitely succeed? How many of them persisted to the end? How many days did they hold meetings, and did they know where they would sleep at night? Yuehe Street! Do you know what Yuehe Street was used for 100 years ago?
Most Chinese people seem to lack a common sense: it's as if the old and new democratic revolutions in China only had the Kuomintang and the Communist Party. Wrong! At the same time, there were countless other parties and forces doing the same thing, but these parties have disappeared in the long river of historical struggle, becoming unsung heroes. But at that time, many people also supported and sponsored them.
Believers in BTC and blockchain: You wouldn't naively think that decentralization will always remain only at the economic and financial level, would you? Then why does the Party-State fear BTC and the crypto circle like a deadly enemy? You shouldn't naively think that the Party-State lacks talented people and cannot understand the essence and prospects of these things, right? Heh. V字旅Eric:** Teacher Li issuing coins was quite sudden, like a stone thrown into a lake, causing ripples. If there had been some prior preparation, perhaps everyone would have been more accepting. But this is his right and freedom, and he bears the risk and return himself, as do the participants. If it succeeds, the anti-CCP movement will have another channel for operation and experience. If it fails, we will also have more lessons learned. As for our actions, they are currently self-funded. Future funding issues will be handled in a general and traditional revolutionary manner. 多伦多方脸: Why do I say that the emergence of $LI is epoch-making? Many people may not be aware of the current situation in the overseas circle, especially for young people. I am fortunate because I was successful in business before I left China and my financial situation was relatively good. After coming abroad and starting YouTube, I have had a stable cash flow, so my life is not a worry. But along the way, I have seen too many people, especially young people, living very difficult lives. Some of them are doing meaningful things, and they are capable and have ideas, but because of the CCP's restrictions (such as demanding parents cut off income, freezing bank cards, freezing domestic assets, reporting their jobs, etc.), they are living very miserable lives. And what are the general solutions? In fact, there are no solutions. It's not like the pinkies propaganda claims, with hundreds of billions of US dollars funding everywhere every year, easily getting the so-called "dog food." Even if there is, it's mostly from NGOs, and because these NGOs are global, the ones at the front might be even more miserable Iranians, Venezuelans, etc. Moreover, young people, due to lack of experience, are less likely to receive funding than the older generation. Not to mention that even if these NGOs provide funding, the amount is often pitifully small. As for public fundraising, how much can be raised? Everyone knows. Of course, I'm not saying that their living conditions should be improved, these people deserve to get rich. But in this living condition, what can they do? Most young people rely on spirit and willpower to do things. They work during the day and use their spare time on weekends and evenings to participate in various activities. How can the scale of these activities be large? For many young journalists, receiving稿费 (manuscript fees) that are not even enough for interview travel expenses, how can they write high-quality investigative reports? What kind of "great things" can be achieved with such persistence? However, if $LI succeeds and proves not to be a scam, establishing trust, it will change this situation. In the future, if people think their project is good, they will release it and raise funds through cryptocurrency technology. With the support of the crypto circle, regardless of whether some people enter to gamble or some people genuinely want to fund projects, the scale of funds raised will be incomparable to before. In this case, many things can be accomplished. For example, if someone truly has the technical means to break through the firewall, which everyone has been longing for, they can publicly propose the plan and raise funds through cryptocurrency, and everyone can invest. Instead of waiting for the US to show mercy, or for some NGO to show mercy and be willing to undertake this project. The initiative for project advancement will be in the hands of the Chinese themselves. Iggie: Some people have the mentality of wanting the horse to run but not wanting it to eat grass. Even when I write articles and earn a meager subscription fee, I am accused of "cutting leeks." How many people have you seen who "cut leeks" as hard as I do? If it weren't for political passion, investing so much energy for nothing, would I still expect to "cut your leeks" with this little money?! Many people have a habitual free-rider mentality, simply put, they are accustomed to getting things for free. In addition to supporting Teacher Li's coin issuance fundraising, I personally believe there are some imperfections: To this end, we will establish a foundation using $LI to help and support young individuals and teams with ideals to create more meaningful and valuable works. At the same time, thanks to the fairness and transparency of the blockchain, we can showcase our endeavors as we expect, openly and fairly. Our ultimate goal is to build a decentralized overseas Chinese community ecosystem. Any team with ideals and aspirations can showcase their projects in the community, and all $LI holders will vote on whether to support the project. This is Li's vision for the future use of the LI coin foundation. Public transparency is indeed a good choice, but it clearly excludes those who are engaged in more dangerous armed anti-CCP activities, as these anti-CCP individuals cannot publicly expose their action plans. Of course, Teacher Li himself said that the foundation is only for building a decentralized overseas Chinese community ecosystem, not for building military strength.