A 2023 first-instance ruling found that failure to report for duty from October 1 to 3 constituted a refusal to work overtime on statutory holidays rather than absenteeism, but absence from October 4 to 7 constituted absenteeism; the company's termination of the employment relationship was lawful, and it was not required to pay the 29992.82 yuan in compensation ordered by the arbitration award.
Evidence EVIDENCE
Sources 1 · Archived 0
SourceTypeReliabilityLink
李老师不是你老师
2026-10-14 05:27 · 上海总工会披露旧案：四川一保安国庆7天全被排班、未到岗遭开除，仲裁裁决公司赔近3万，法院却判公司无需赔偿。
First-hand
●●●●●
Context CONTEXT
Cause
2022.10
·Reported
·Importance II
·Sichuan
This event
Court rules in first instance that property company's dismissal of security guard absent during the National Day holiday was lawful and no compensation is owed
2023 · Reported
Effect
Not recorded yet
Coverage of this event COVERAGE