反 反贼网
Machine translation · the Chinese original is authoritative · View original

Chiang Wan-an Keeps Offending Taipei Residents

1# · OP Author:新聞硬邦邦 Published:2026-10-18 13:32 Replies:0 Views:108 Permalink:fanzei.net/d_rm8krn

This episode mainly discusses the controversies triggered by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an regarding issues such as the Shezi Island development and Songshan Airport policy proposals, criticizing his policies for ignoring the rights and interests of Shezi Island residents. At the same time, the episode explores Trump's considerations on Ukraine policy on the eve of the US presidential election, international oil prices and the Russian factor, as well as recent riots and refugee issues in France, and finally calls on viewers to support overseas anti-communist and independent media speaking out for Taiwan.

Video Link:

Full Text:

Hard-hitting news, listening to the news is the best. I am the show host Stan, welcome everyone, I hope everyone is doing well and everyone is happy. Now the situation is tense, and a lot of things are happening, and I have a lot of cases recently too, like doing various creations. But I want to tell you, though there aren't many people yet, I want you to know I like video games, and recently, you know, there's a game that completely hooked me, I have no way, no way, until I haven't finished it, I have no way to put down that controller. This is, oh god, I even checked today, its Chinese translation is called something like Fire Emblem. Fortune's wave, Fortune's wave is that, why is it translated as something like Qian Zi Wan Hong, I don't know how this translation got messed up, because in English it's called Fire Emblem, in Japanese it's Fire Emblem, which just means Fire Emblem, and then in Chinese it's translated as something like Sheng Huo Jiang Mo Lu, oh god, every time I feel they translate it completely differently from the original meaning, but I think because I really like this series, a good friend of our channel, my fan is Mac Lee, Mac Lee hates Fire Emblem, but I like Fire Emblem, I've liked it since the 3DS generation. And because its strategic mode is quite good, I did spend a little time playing this thing, and its voice acting, all kinds of voice acting, the story, and the degree of customization, I think they are all done very well, it's really worth it. And you know what, I used to always think, I have that Switch 2, Switch 2 games are just available on PS 5 anyway, but after getting that Fire Emblem, I feel that buying Switch 2 was really worth it, otherwise before I only used it to play Persona, or some games made by Atlas, and this company will also make Zelda, that remastered version, but I don't know why everyone is discussing it, but old games, remaking them won't be like that anyway, I don't know, I feel game companies are all very lazy now, just keep making remastered versions of old games, I don't like it, I think you should all make some new things, new things, look at how fun the new Resident Evil is, I've beaten it five times, and even beaten it on the ultra-hard mode, they all make those remastered versions, I say that Ocarina of Time, I don't know how it's translated in Chinese, but I don't want to buy it, I feel this behavior, I won't support it, I won't support remaking old things, you should just make new ones, you should just make new ones.

Thank you for your continuous support. Taiwan is a must; this is my mission, and I also feel it's something I should do because this is my home. Having lived in Taiwan for so many years, and well, half of my family is Taiwanese, right? How could I possibly not support it? Furthermore, supporting Taiwan also serves my personal interests. As a Westerner, as someone from our democratic camp, I feel that if Taiwan falls, we will all be in trouble—we will be in deep trouble. So I think, goodness me, if we don't support this country, who else could we support, right? We must support Taiwan, and our values are the same.

There are Simplified Chinese users. You Simplified Chinese users, get lost! You're the ones who look like monkeys, oh god. First of all, where are monkeys from? As long as it's not the Chinese Communist Party's country, right? You know, a country without even basic human rights is trash. Garbage Simplified Chinese users, every time I see them, you know, I say that Chinese people and Simplified Chinese users are different. This is my own concept. Whenever you see things like "your mom is dead," these kinds of abusive trolls, and they're all about Greater China nationalism, and they always disparage people, and their rhetoric is extremely low-class and vulgar—these are called Simplified Chinese users. These are Simplified Chinese users because their alphabet, their characters were simplified, so their brains also degraded, their brains were simplified. Of course, there are normal Chinese people too, there are normal Chinese people. I really hate Simplified Chinese characters, you know? I hate Simplified Chinese characters, I hate Simplified Chinese users. It's not that using Simplified Chinese characters is the problem—I have no objection to the characters—just don't act like a Simplified Chinese user. That is, the characters aren't the problem, but don't be a Simplified Chinese user. Simplified Chinese users and Simplified Chinese characters are different. Educational level, yes, exactly, the degree of civilization is also simplified. Yes, that's what I'm talking about, the degree of civilization is also simplified, meaning that all the wonderful things of traditional Chinese culture from the past have been simplified and ignored. Therefore, the CCP is the ultimate entity opposing such traditional values.

Today, I still feel we need to chat with everyone about the election campaign. Besides the campaign, let's also talk about the recent issues between the US and Ukraine. I think this is quite important. What is Trump's train of thought, and what is right and wrong? We should just stick to the facts and discuss matters objectively. Good things still need to be praised, and bad things need to be pointed out. I think wrong things must also be addressed because, in order to save his campaign, I simply cannot agree with his approach toward Ukraine. I know his thought process, I know what he wants, but acting this way will not yield good results; the results will not be good. But anyway, the US election is coming up—the 18th, right? There are only two weeks left. So with just two weeks remaining, let's see how things develop over in the US. Love Taiwan, yeah, Taiwan will be fine. I love Taiwan too; Taiwan is not my home, Taiwan is not my country, it's a special country to the US—old Taiwanese, right? Exactly, Taiwan must be supported, there's no other way.

I really encourage everyone to watch our videos this week—both of them are worth watching. Although I feel, sometimes when I look at my view counts and what our fans and viewers like, the algorithm feels really weird, you know? Last week, I spent three days editing an English video of over half an hour talking about Taiwan's status in the international community. I spent a lot of time making dynamic maps, sort of in Johnny Harris's style, though not quite, but using a large number of maps just like his videos to explain things, and I talked about quite a few crucial points. The traffic on the English channel is naturally not very good, so it grows more slowly. But you know, I spent three days, and then another day or so editing my interview from Finland—that one did a bit better. However, my brief commentary on Jensen Huang, where I quickly shared my views, got the best traffic. So sometimes you really have no idea what YouTube is pushing.

Is your wife Taiwanese? I am not Taiwanese, but I am also Taiwanese. I have lived in Taiwan for many years, and then I lived in Taiwan for 15 years, a very long time, so I am already Taiwanese. Taiwanese people also identify with me quite a bit, so I suppose—you don't mind me saying I am Taiwanese, you shouldn't mind, right? Anyone from China can naturalize, a Pole who is harmless to Taiwan, and a Pole who has such good relations with the United States—surely you wouldn't mind, right? Anyway, I will also make some contributions to Taiwan, allowing Taiwan to have more connections internationally. We do this kind of work, because wearing a Dao Mo means doing academic research, and I also help out in think tanks doing some analyses, including the Indo-Pacific Strategic Think Tank, where I also do academic research. I also have some academic background; I am a human rights researcher. Speaking of Taiwan, apart from these academic pursuits, my channel and our various interviews allow Taiwanese people to understand better the ins and outs internationally, the dynamics, and how countries around the world increase interactions with Taiwan and develop relations with it. We do all of these things. Also, my street interviews and my participation in international conferences are all aimed at making Taiwan's voice heard. You can see that I often film those street interviews, and I feel my goal is also to use the most direct and simplest ways to let people around the world understand what Taiwan is really like, what Taiwan is facing, and why Taiwan matters. I feel the effect is there, and gradually the effect is rising.

Thank you for speaking up for Taiwan. Although I am from mainland China, thank you for your support. I say Chinese people are very good; I have many anti-communist Chinese friends whom I respect, and I especially respect and revere the Chinese friends who are willing to watch my channel and are willing to not support the Communist Party. Because as we say, there are not many people left who are willing to pay the price to oppose it, but at least if they are willing to not support it, not collude with it, and not sing its praises, we can already be friends, we can already have a huge common denominator, and we can already have a very large consensus. Because as for Chinese people, I think Taiwanese people don't need to be overly—meaning not all Chinese people are the same. There are many who think independently; with a country's population being so large and so many people, there are so many outstanding individuals. Of course, there are also a bunch of bastards; those who join the Communist Party are all bastards, and one by one they will have to be dealt with. This stance of mine has never changed, but those who are willing to oppose it and willing to not support it—that means you are already greater than those born and raised in a democratic country who received a democratic country's education. The efforts you make are already greater than most people in democratic countries. Your thinking and efforts have already broken through the average of most of the world, because in China you are definitely brainwashed, and being brainwashed to support the Communist Party is simple. So if you are willing to think, it shows you are already very formidable. Once this kind of Chinese person becomes more numerous, I think for China's future—actually, regarding China's long-term future, as long as the Communist Party is gone, this country will become very good, this country will become very excellent. But unfortunately, right now it is controlled by the Communist Party, so thank you for your support.

And then the Simplified Chinese users I just mentioned—Simplified Chinese users are those who churn out Simplified Chinese characters and then rant incoherently, and rant wildly, and you know, with a whole bunch of profanities, a whole bunch of profanities like green frogs, silk-worm rats, and things like that. So gross, so gross, like calling me a traitor. I'm not even a Han Chinese person, when did I become a Han Chinese traitor? I feel that—well, just curse away, I have no opinion on that. Manson, you have already surpassed those Taiwanese people who live in Taiwan but whose hearts are set on China, shouting slogans that China is their motherland and loving it so much—why don't you just hurry up and move over there? Let me tell you, some of these people also do it for their own personal interests, and they won't consider the costs. That is to say, these democratic trust-fund babies just don't understand the ins and outs of things. But you know, I feel this kind of person is to some extent also something the Taiwan government and the current Democratic Progressive Party need to strengthen communication with. I feel that right now the Taiwan government is doing everything right, but why haven't these people heard it? So we Taiwan-leaning folks here, those who support Taiwan, we lose in propaganda, we lose in communicating with different, with the non-literate strata. We lose right there, because clearly the Democratic Progressive Party is very excellent, but why do so many people hold such deep-seated hatred towards it? I think it must be that information communication was not done well, so the psychological warfare must step up its efforts. You must look at the online media—most of them are too lazy, which ones are green, you know? Which ones are pro-Taiwan-leaning? Well, the

Pot Network, but recently Pot Network hasn't been updating very frequently. People are still there, people talking about political issues are still there, but either they don't talk about political issues comprehensively or they only talk about them occasionally. So, people won't hear about them. Therefore, the key is how to spread the message, which is the most important thing. That's why I went to debate Peng Wen-cheng. I think that's also a very good way to break out of the echo chamber, and I think the results were quite good. Anyway, it lets everyone know what Peng Wen-cheng is thinking, but I must also say that he is willing to talk, he is willing to be challenged, probably because as someone with an academic background, he might also know when something is wrong, but at least he is willing to accept challenges, which is great. Because I know what we are talking about, we stand on the side of truth, and we are not afraid of challenges. Being able to think from opposing perspectives and break out of the cage of communist ideology, the old cage, is really inspiring. I see many people from Malaysia and Singapore who are very pro-CCP. Yes, I feel that those pro-CCP people from Taiwan, Malaysia, and Singapore are letting down the Chinese people. You are letting down those who are truly willing to resist this totalitarian government, this external totalitarian government. Because for China, the Communist Party is something foreign, it is the ideology of Germany and Russia. You are submitting to this foreign regime, you are looking down on the Chinese people, because the regime that has harmed the most Chinese people and destroyed traditional Chinese culture is called the Communist Party. So this logic is simple, this logic is super simple.

Well, let's talk about some recent election situations. I see more people showing up, and I'm very glad to chat with everyone. OK, mainly speaking about the Taipei mayoral election, it has recently become much fiercer. And I feel that Puma Shen did a great job; he is very deeply connected with Shilin District, and he has gone to Shilin many times. This time he also went to Shezi. The Shezi itinerary this time should be, let me think, the second or third one. Because to be honest, Chiang Wan-an is talking about clearing and demolishing everywhere, but I think many places in Taipei need to be developed, and actually the most pitiful place is Shezi and the people of Shezi. Because for over 50 years, they have been bullied and discriminated against. Over the years, Taipei mayors, including Ko Wen-je, including Hao Lung-bin in the past, including Ma Ying-jeou, all looked down upon the people of Shezi. Ko Wen-je obviously looked down on the people of Shezi—do you remember? In the past, he directly drove bulldozers over there, and he used "greedy old people" to describe the people in Shezi. You yourselves restricted Shezi's development, you yourselves bullied Shezi for decades, for 50 years, and then turned around to scold the people of Shezi. Actually, the development of Shezi is not that hard to solve; it is a problem that can be solved with money, plus providing them with enough respect. Since they have been bullied for so many years, shouldn't you compensate them? You, the Taipei City Government, you simply owe the people of Shezi an apology; you simply owe the people of Shezi. And then Chiang Wan-an, it's very obvious, he only wants land developers, just like Ko Wen-je, so he wants to oppress the people of a democratic country. Chiang Wan-an regards himself as the mayor of Beijing; he does not regard himself as the mayor of Taipei. Didn't Beijing tear down a bunch of hutongs? Many traditional Beijing cultures over there ended up gone. And Chiang Wan-an wants to mess things up this way too. As for Shezi, it is also viewed from the perspective of indigenous culture, and then down to temples and all kinds of things. If you study it deeply, it is a very important historical area, a historical block of Taipei. It used to be the Ketagalan people over there. If you want to do urban renewal there, if you want to develop there, and build some houses to make it more progressive, then you should start with the basics first. You protect these temples and shrines, you protect some cultural districts, and then you must first make Shezi Island or Yanping North Road—those places—have streetlights lit up, clear the drainage ditches, sweep the roads, and make the living environment there better. And when you do expropriation, you must also offer a convincing price. You can definitely afford it; you, the Taipei City Government, definitely can afford it, you know? You have money for Songshan Airport, but you have no money to let Shezi develop? You have money! Moreover, Shezi is actually a great place. Look at the map, it's at the intersection of the Keelung River and the Tamsui River, and on the right it goes toward Guandu and the Guandu Plain, and on the left is Sanchong. It is right between Tamsui, Shilin, and Sanchong-Luzhou, with water resources and everything. It is a place that has everything. If you let it develop, actually its land will also appreciate in value, and you will profit in the future too. Don't bully people. Chiang Wan-an, don't bully people. And look, there are really more elderly people over there. This time, when Puma Shen went there, there was a white-haired lady who told him, "It's very pitiful, please help Shezi, please help Shezi." Hearing this makes you think: right, the people here need help and tolerance. Taipei, the capital of a country, doesn't just have Xinyi District and Songshan District; it has Shilin District, and there are many places that need to be developed. Look at this lady like this, and as a result, a bunch of Chiang Wan-an's internet trolls, water armies, and red-leaning people said she was acting, saying she is not a resident of Shezi. People from their self-help association also came out to say she is a resident of Shezi, or saying she doesn't live in Shezi. Why do so many Shezi residents not live in Shezi? Because you restricted Shezi's development for 50 years; those who could leave naturally left, but that is their home. They might have lived there for generations, for hundreds of years, and you forced them to leave. You yourselves made this place turn out like this because of your restrictions. This is man-made, not natural. This is the incompetence of the Taipei City Government; you are a low-class Taipei City Government, you are a Taipei City Government that looks down on the people of Shezi and discriminates against the people of Shezi. You are a rotten government! And these people are... because your Kuomintang has been in power there for how many years, do you know? And the local people told Puma Shen—he is another candidate; of course, in a democratic country there are two candidates, and Puma Shen is also a candidate and very likely to become mayor—they said please pay attention to this area. And Puma Shen is also the only one, truly, in all my years of watching the Taipei elections, who has been relatively friendly to Shezi. He also said he wants to hear the voices of local citizens, because they are also Taipei citizens, and they also have votes. Your vote in Xinyi District and the vote in Shezi carry the exact same weight; the votes of people in Xinyi are not more noble. Shezi residents pay taxes just the same. Oh god, do you know? I get angry just looking at this. Don't you have elders in your family, Chiang Wan-an? Don't you have elders? How can you treat an elderly lady like this? It's disgusting, Chiang Wan-an, utterly disgusting. You might as well go be the mayor of Beijing; you are not fit to be the mayor of Taipei.

And then, and then go there to take a post, the real actor is you after you finish talking, and your acting skills are also terrible in this acting, Kuo Cheng-liang can act better than you, a dead cat can act better than you, right OK, and then you see, it's just sending off at the front and then taking a post there, photographing a bunch of staff and spokespersons and then explaining there, what are you explaining to your staff, the staff should also have figured it out themselves, and then why did you send off at the front, you have always said that coming to Taipei to answer is your political achievement, bullshit, answering to invest in Taipei has half a cent of relation with you, it's Taipei's geographical location resources and, because he has the Beitou Shilin Technology Park, right, he also has the Neihu Technology Park, he has these far districts, and then what? Airport is convenient, big bosses won't take the MRT for you, not because big bosses have money, it's because big bosses are in mortal danger, safety-related considerations, you call Jensen Huang, take a plane to Taoyuan Airport, and then take the airport MRT there, are you crazy? Are you alright? Can't you escape up? Is there anything in your brain? Which big boss will take the MRT for you?

Because a bunch of people will follow, and he also knows a lot of confidential information, you see him recently on that Lex Friedman show, there are bodyguards next to him, there are people watching next to him, why would he take the MRT? And Jensen Huang investing in Taipei, the reason is very simple, where did he buy that land? Shilin District, near the Beitou Shilin Technology Park, Shilin District over there, and it's close to Songshan Airport, you arrive by plane, and you get to your company in 20 minutes or 30 minutes, convenient, after the meeting you can fly back to the United States, or fly to Japan or other places. Songshan Airport is a treasure land for rich people, it is a rare and convenient airport, you can do business as soon as you fly in the downtown area, you can hold meetings as soon as you fly in, you can hold meetings as soon as you arrive, you can do many things as soon as you arrive.

And then after talking they will say, but how is New York? JFK is far away. New York has LaGuardia, LaGuardia is very close to the downtown area, New York has more than one airport, didn't you know Chiang Wan-an? Probably didn't know. LA also has several airports, oh my god, it's really, I rarely curse people's IQ, but I think Chiang Wan-an is really very deficient, really very deficient. The funniest thing is, Li Sichuan's political views were dumped by him, Li Sichuan said he wanted to pull the MRT from New Taipei City to Songshan Airport, yes yes yes I remember, in order to be re-elected, even hitting his own people, you know? When he talked about that Songshan Airport, he talked about it very suddenly, he was on that Kuo Cheng-liang show, and he was going to scold Kuo Cheng-liang. Why is Kuo Cheng-liang asking him inconvenient questions there, making him fill the starry sky? Thinking I'm going to send him off, you know? After you finish talking you want to blame Kuo Cheng-liang, hurry up and put away that rotten political view!

We must thank Chiang Wan-an, because he proved that Kuo Cheng-liang is a guy who talks nonsense with his eyes open. Because of him, because Kuo Cheng-liang didn't react for a moment, when Chiang Wan-an went on his show, he said, this is a presidential-level political view, whoever proposes this will lose the election, and this is not very likely to be realized, he said this directly on that show, this is his sincere words. And after this show passed, he started to constantly, maybe he was scolded, constantly washing the floor for Chiang Wan-an like this at Hapa Park, and then started to constantly help wash the floor for Chiang Wan-an, so everyone can know that this guy is talking nonsense with his eyes open. In this regard, we must thank Chiang Wan-an, letting Kuo Cheng-liang reveal his original form, and also thanking Kuo Cheng-liang for revealing Chiang Wan-an's actual IQ and ignorance. Tang Xianglong is also like this, when Chiang Wan-an went on his show, didn't he say that if he didn't trust Chiang, he wouldn't even be the mayor now, and then probably after being scolded, he started to constantly help Chiang Wan-an wash the floor, and then constantly scolding Pofung Shen, saying things like Pofung Shen changed back and forth, different from before, it's not like that at all, but we can know how powerful these people are, the ability to talk nonsense with eyes open is unmatched, truly.

They all offend anyway, my live broadcast title today wrote, Chiang Wan-an offended all Taipei citizens, including the pro-unification Tang Xianglong's. You say you are Chinese, he says I am Taiwanese, when trusting Chiang he ran fast, but when being Chinese he didn't dare. Don't trust Chiang, trusting Chiang means being Chinese, it's the Chiang family, it's Chiang Kai-shek, it's Chiang Ching-kuo, you don't trust together with them, what is going on? Knowing it's shameful too, knowing Taiwanese people don't like the Chiang family. Those people of the Chiang family, their personal lives are also very chaotic, like Chiang Ching-kuo also having a mistress there, this is very ugly you know, and then forcibly making a connection between oneself and the descendants of the mistresses of past politicians, I think this is not good-looking, it's just not good-looking. You can just be your Chang Wan-an, but you want to get involved with that family, it's also your choice, then you have to bear it, you have to say Chinese, yes, Chinese, more Chinese than Beijing, the most upright, the most Chinese Chinese, and see how many Taipei people will vote for you? Knowing votes will drop too.

Come on, folks, Taiwan compatriots are here, leave this to me, this Stan is not suitable to talk about, why? We oppose it, first of all I am a female, but I oppose the offspring of a public bus, her grandmother was a public bus, and she specifically looked for rich and powerful men, a public bus who just snatched other people's husbands. A type like that, Chang Ya-juo, for that offspring Chang Ya-juo gave birth to to make it to the mayor of Taipei, being a mistress to that extent can be considered quite impressive. She is the public enemy of all women in the world who are married and have husbands, her grandmother looks like this, I look down on you, I really look down on you. And her father wasn't much better, a gift sent from heaven, just a playboy. I think the most pitiful and unlucky person in the Chiang family is Chiang Fang-liang, because recently I've been looking at historical materials related to Taiwan's history, and I keep thinking, oh god, you know? A girl from Belarus, and because she truly loved that bastard Chiang Ching-kuo, truly loved him, came to China and was looked down upon by the entire Chiang family including Soong Mei-ling and Chiang Kai-shek, discriminated against, disliked, and looked down upon. And then, when escaping to Taiwan, that bastard still had an affair, this husband Chiang Ching-kuo, this piece of garbage, you know? Not only are his hands stained with blood, because he ran the special security, you know, arresting opposition figures in Taiwan during martial law, that dictator's son, but he also had affairs, and was unfaithful to his wife. Just think, a girl from the Soviet Union, being treated like this, and after Chiang Ching-kuo died, didn't leave her anything either. At that time Lee Teng-hui still had to issue a retirement pension for her, so pathetic, so pathetic, truly so pathetic.

Let me add, fine, you say, I'm just talking about her public bus grandmother, or rather her real public bus great-grandmother. If she were, for example, OK, maybe her original marriage was unhappy, and then she met a powerful man, fell in love with him, then we could barely forgive, forgive. But this woman wasn't like that, she was one after another, one after another, and as long as she found that someone was richer and more powerful than her last one, she would pounce on him. This is a very annoying type, which is the most well-known curse word in Polish, you guys know? That word starting with K, that's what describes this kind of person's behavior, that's what describes this kind of person's behavior, it's disgusting, it's terrible. So I don't know whose offspring she actually is, but you know what? This thing is the product of a very promiscuous sex life, and those Blue camp people still treat it like a treasure. Wait a minute, having affairs can still be praised like this, that thoroughly proves the morality of the Chiang family, the Kuomintang, and those people—how it is virtually non-existent. I wanted to say low-cost, cheap, but is there even cheap? It's just zero, non-existent, no different from the Communist bandits, no different from the Communist bandits, just disgusting. And this, I want to be mayor, because I'm his descendant, right, I'm not the offspring of a legitimate marriage, I'm a mistress's child, but hahaha, I'm of the Chiang family, how gross, how gross, you know? Hearing this makes me want to wash my hands, oh god!

Yeah, anyway, the Kuomintang must fade into insignificance for Taiwan to be saved. Right, it's just morally corrupt, just a bunch of morally corrupt people, and you know what? It's all fake, no doctoral degrees either, everything is fake, which of their items is real? Then old me hitting gophers, playing whack-a-mole with Huang Kuo-chang, and every time you ask a question they don't know, and then returning to Shezi, wasn't there a Shezi Self-Help Association person who went to ask him a question back then? Mayor, how should this problem be solved? Thank you thank you, and then he got on the bus and left. Taipei people, do you really want this person as your mayor? Everything he represents is the most embarrassing side of Taiwan's history, the side of Taiwan's history that should least be proud of, which is the existence of the Chiang family, and the tolerance of the Taiwanese people toward the Chiang family. Soong Mei-ling's personal life was also very chaotic, yes, and very high-profile, both chaotic and high-profile, so I say the Kuomintang is just like the Communist party, because just look at Mao Zedong's sex life, Chiang Kai-shek, Chiang Ching-kuo, and Soong Mei-ling, they are all very chaotic, very chaotic. Sun Yat-sen too, you know? Your sex life is so chaotic, then how can you be a leader? You are supposed to be a moral role model, and yet they still salute Sun Yat-sen, he is also, you know? Doesn't Tzuyi Lan like digging up paper plagiarism so much? Look at which item of the Three Principles of the People is not plagiarism? The Sun Yat-sen you all worship, which theory that he promoted was not plagiarized from Western leftists? And you still say the Principle of Livelihood is communism, which theory of Sun the Big-Gun wasn't plagiarized? Oh god, really really really, shameless, indeed.

Huang Kuo-chang's recent interview was unlistenable, I totally look down on him, but you know what, I have to say, my thoughts might be a bit different from yours. You Wen-quan, thank you so much for the sponsorship, my thoughts are slightly different from yours. I also hate Huang Kuo-chang, but I think asking Huang Kuo-chang to catch rats, this is good, so therapeutic. You have rats in the city, how are you going to play whack-a-mole? Look at me being so great, it literally turns people completely into morons. When I watched it back then, I thought, Huang Kuo-chang, hold on, are you doing this on purpose? You're doing it on purpose, you must still be holding a grudge that New Taipei City let you run, and let Li Sichuan run instead, because Li Sichuan has no personal charisma either, cannot speak, has no political platform, and nobody knows how he got pushed up there. Then Huang Kuo-chang naturally thinks he is better than Li Sichuan, and he is taking revenge on Chiang Wan-an, because when Chiang Wan-an was the mayor of Taipei, he never praised Ko Wen-je's previous administration, nor did he ever thank them, he just acted like it was all his own achievement. But everyone can see that those were actually some policies left over from Ko Wen-je's era, and those policies were also criticized by everyone for a long time. And seriously, what about the Dome, that Taipei Dome should have been finished very soon after Hau Lung-bin's era, and then it was smeared as a major corruption scandal by Ko Wen-je. As a result, after investigating the major corruption scandal for four years, in his second term he said it was almost built, so not much could be changed, so I just continue building it, and then it comes to him. So let me ask, what kind of political achievement is this thing anyway? What kind of ghost political achievement is that? I don't get it, it still leaks, and there are still rats inside.

Lisa Lin said, it's Huang Kuo-chang who looks down on Chiang Wan-an, not you looking down on Huang Kuo-chang, OK OK, misunderstood, misunderstood. Yeah, he just looks down on him. Let me ask you, who looks down on him? Out of me and everyone present, does anyone look down on Chiang Wan-an? But even his own son looks down on him, I think, because when he took that thing and acted like a little brat, how could he be so, so aggrieved? Every time I see the news about Chiang Wan-an, I wonder if there will be anything new and awkward, and indeed there is. Last time he went to sing, Taipei Encore, Taipei Encore, Taipei pug, Taipei pug, and the audience underneath all fell silent, feeling awkward. The most awkward part is, while he was singing he even forgot the lyrics. How did he sing the lyrics? The lyrics, I forgot. Then the audience below was very awkward, because everyone knows his memory isn't good, and basically besides reciting a script he can't remember anything, and he recites it badly too. Yeah, it just happened to prove this matter, awkward, this is really awkward, he even forgot the lyrics. You know, it's just like when I was in kindergarten I would do that too, kids singing, like, ah, I forgot the lyrics. A four-year-old child doing this would be considered cute, but you are an uncle mayor approaching fifty years old, the mayor of a city of over two million people, what are you messing around for? Oh god, really, I feel that in this election, there really is no one whom Chiang Wan-an hasn't offended. I have no opinion about Chiang Wan-an, but I simply feel that the Kuomintang has too many people licking the CCP, so you can't vote for him. He licks the CCP too, he hasn't licked any less.

Some people are saying that after the Prince Group was busted in Taiwan, Wang Jun's whitewashing efforts were a lot less. Otherwise, when Chiang Wan-an and Chen Shih-chung were running last time, he said things like doing deep squats in the MRT, and some weird policies, and said things like reissuing the Chung Yang Senior Citizens' Allowance, and then he got elected just like that. Nobody scrutinized him, he just relied on smearing. And at that time those people like Ma De were still around, they also continued to buy people off, and continued to serve as that party-state machine. Wang Dawei from Cambodia was also still around, and still went to intimidate, harass, and smear, and do human flesh searches on people everywhere. These people were all found out to be connected to those scam syndicates, and Chiang Wan-an is acquainted with all these people, plus certain foreigners who are still around now, they are all very familiar with him and know him. So the interesting things haven't happened yet, let us wait and see, many interesting things will continue to be staged, OK fine.

Lisa Lin wrote very well, her staff, 100 years, or even that era, how can it be compared with the economic and political education aspects of today's era? Is there a DNA rule for elections? There is no DNA rule for elections, but morality has DNA, morality has rules. You must have morality, and then if you associate yourself with a family of mass murderers, then you have to take the blame. If you run under your original surname, Chang, or if you change to another surname, because changing to the surname Chiang helps you a lot, that is being yourself and putting forward your own political platform, and no one will associate you with the Chiang family anymore, or have anything to do with those people like Chiang Ching-kuo and Chiang Wei-kuo. First, Tang Xianglong even helped you, personally certified it. If he doesn't believe in Chiang, he wouldn't be the mayor. So are you now saying that what Tang Xianglong said is wrong? I don't care about elections or no elections anyway, he is just the descendant of a mistress, let's just talk about it, the Chiang family is just a matter of sexual chaos, that's a fact, the mistress, his grandmother is a mistress, indeed, a political prostitute, you know? This is your family business, you shouldn't bring it out, because your ancestors, those Chiang Ching-kuo and those people didn't want to bring this relationship to the surface, yet you treat it as something proud, this is just like John Chiang and Wayne Chiang, you didn't change your surname, you didn't disassociate yourselves from the Chiang family, no one would comment on you, nor would anyone ask you to take a paternity test. So why did they ask you to take a paternity test? Because Chang Ya-juo's sex life was chaotic, it is not known whose child he was, because he was already the child of a mistress, that's why people asked him to take a paternity test, he didn't dare, because he himself didn't have full certainty, and randomly recognized relatives, this is a very embarrassing thing, this is a very embarrassing thing, this shouldn't be mentioned, but the Kuomintang actually treats this as a symbol of, I don't know what. And you know what, John Chiang and Wayne Chiang actually also look down on the Chiang family, because Chiang Ching-kuo himself said that the Chiang family should not participate in politics, this is the last time, because once they participate in politics they engage in dictatorship, this is my family's, once they participate in politics they engage in dictatorship, which member of the Chiang family is not a dictator, just those two, Chiang Kai-shek and Chiang Ching-kuo, and also Chiang Wei-kuo who served in the Nazi army, that family is very evil, hungry, bad, feeling bad, lacking morality. Not to mention how Wayne Chiang is, his political views are also all over the place and talking nonsense, just talking nonsense, they always talk nonsense without making any preparations, without doing homework, he is just an awkward, very embarrassing mayor, good.

Then before we enter Trump's team, I want to recommend to you a conservative organization that I strongly support and that strongly supports us. What is this conservative organization called? Does everyone know? It's called the Reformation Fellowship, and their website is fratwm.org. If you are not clear whether you are left-wing or right-wing, or if you are interested in Western politics, you can go to the Reformation Fellowship to take a test, and then see whether you lean left or right, and what kind of view you hold on economic issues and social issues. But today I want to specially recommend a segment called Ten Minutes Ago, where they very seriously organize international news every day for everyone to see. You just look at it every day, you see it every day, you look at yesterday, there is news related to the Russia-Ukraine energy ceasefire, he first organizes the focus, after the focus is just various regions talking about some key points, actually every single one is a focus, every single one is very important, and like we see finally they organized and told us, while the US Navy implemented a maritime blockade to roughly cut off Iran's crude oil exports, intelligence revealed that Iran used ship-to-ship transfers in the waters outside Oman as a cover, and then you can see the details right here, right here, divided into Indo-Pacific, Europe and Russia, Americas, and Asia-Africa, it's very convenient. They also have a podcast on YouTube, where they will read those news items to everyone, so we must very much thank the Reformation Fellowship, Taiwan's Reformation Fellowship for their support of us. Stan can often be seen at the activities of the Reformation Fellowship, like last time when Secretary of State Pompeo came to Taiwan, I helped interpret for him, right? I was the host on stage, and then during the press interviews, I helped Secretary of State Pompeo interpret, yes, good.

Then we will move on to our other topics and talk about Trump. Do you all know recently? The election race in the US is quite tense, because the issue in Iran still cannot be resolved and there is no way to achieve a ceasefire, which has also led to a rise in international oil prices and gold breaking 100 dollars. You don't see this as much in Europe or in Taiwan, because the Taiwan government absorbs a lot of it, preventing the people of Taiwan from bearing too much of a burden. Let's take a look. And then, international oil prices keep rising instead, but this doesn't mean it doesn't affect Taiwan—it affects Taiwan too, but you just don't see it as much at the gas station. In Europe, however, since I drive a diesel car, it is the most obvious to me. I want to tell you all, when I first bought this diesel car, I thought it was fuel-efficient, safe, and stable, but now the oil price has already broken 2 euros, and even in Poland it has broken 2 euros. It is ridiculously expensive, per liter, not per gallon. It's the same in the US; the US is also heavily affected, so now Trump, he is negotiating with Russia, wanting Russia to release diesel into the market, which is to make more oil appear in the international market, and then the price will drop. This is a simple economic logic, but Russia can't do it yet because its oil refineries have all been bombed, and this time putting pressure on Ukraine means that Ukraine must stop bombing Russia's oil refineries, while Ukraine says Russia must stop bombing our power plants. At present, they have some kind of—is it a ceasefire? I think both sides will not abide by this ceasefire anyway, and Trump is having a very hard time coordinating here too. But think about it, if Russia releases that oil to the international market, and you lift some of the sanctions, Russia gets your money. What will Russia do when it gets your money? It will continue killing Ukrainians, so I think this approach itself is wrong. Furthermore, Ukraine is your ally, and you should support it. The US demands—Renny Vian, what you wrote is correct, but you know what? When the US demands things, Ukraine will still listen to the US, even though recently Zelenskyy is also very unhappy. When doing a TV interview, it felt like Trump was influenced by certain people to make his choice, and he said: I don't mind him standing in the middle, but he just has to stand in the middle—that's what Zelenskyy said. Recently, Trump seems to lean a bit more toward Russia, but I don't think what Zelenskyy said is entirely correct either, because Trump hasn't really started supporting Russia; rather, he wants to solve the oil problem in the short term. These two weeks before the election, these two weeks are about putting out fires, because basically during an election, if you look at the polls now, you will know what issue Americans care about the most: inflation, rising prices. If you don't solve these problems, currently, the Senate might still be okay, but the House of Representatives is very likely to fall into the hands of the Democrats. Falling into the hands of the Democrats is actually not good for the international community or any country, because the US will fall into chaos, and nothing will get resolved, as it would turn into the Democrats saying we want to impeach Trump all over again, just like after his first term. So if the Democrats take office, this country will be paralyzed for two years, and Ukraine will not have a good outcome either. Zelenskyy should be thinking about how to make the US put even more pressure on Russia. At present, the problem is not with Ukraine, nor is it with the US; it is with Russia. Russia is going to indiscriminately burn Ukrainians, and to make this war end, the issue is that Graham, this congressman, didn't he have something called the Graham Act before he passed away? It is also a plan we could call secondary sanctions, meaning anyone associated with Russia will be sanctioned. This needs to be properly implemented. Instead, right now, because your biggest competitor and challenger is only Beijing, and the Putin regime in Russia relies completely on Beijing, you are essentially letting Russia get your money, which is also equivalent to letting Beijing get your money.

Of course, from a strategic perspective, Russia and China will tear apart in the future, and they are bound to tear apart. Russia is constantly being taken advantage of by China—we all know this, we all see it, and we also know that the Russian people do not look favorably upon China. However, the Putin regime itself... because you have to consider that the people in these so-called pro-China countries mostly hate China, because China does not buy off the people; it buys off the leaders, it buys off corrupt officials, and it buys off rotten politicians who are easily bought, including Putin. Now, if you really want to make Russia an ally, here is where my thoughts might differ from many political analysts: I think the potential is there. In the future, Russia is very likely to become an ally of the Western camp. But you have to look at it on a smaller scale, you have to stretch this timeline—not within ten years, and perhaps not within twenty years, but in the future. Moreover, there is a precondition: Putin must step down, they must change their regime, and this pro-China regime must go. So either you stimulate regime change in Russia—and I believe the US also has leverage and influence over many factions and forces within Russia, and Russians themselves are tired of fighting, and their populace does not support this government. Don't look at those Russian polls; Russian polls make it seem like they still support it, but these polls are all controlled by that government, so who dares to conduct an incorrect poll? But looking at the actual situation, if you observe the trend based on social changes, they are dissatisfied with this government. So to make the government change, it's not about giving this government more cards to play or greater room for operation, but rather making it impossible for Putin to continue so that he leaves. That way, in the future... because Trump thinks about strategic issues, such as the Northern Sea Route, which is the Far North route, looking at the Arctic Circle, or seeing the split between China and Russia, or you could even use Russia to promote Christianity, or its energy, its rare earths, its various resources—these are all things you can think about, but this regime is not suitable. I feel that what Trump's strategic analysts are thinking right now is that they believe Putin is negotiable, just like Jensen Huang thinks Xi Jinping is negotiable, which is about avoiding conflict. But these people will not negotiate with you; they will only take advantage of you. This is where you are relatively prone to running into problems. Now Trump is reading the situation because of his approach: he thinks that in the short term, letting him save on oil prices means that after the election he will go all out against Iran, and then he will sanction Russia again. Of course, this is what he thinks, but there are many uncertain factors here. Furthermore, the resources Russia will obtain are likely to make this winter very painful for Ukraine—truly very painful. You still need to know who your allies are.

Someone asked how to view the appearance of Communist flags and Palestinian flags or terrorist flags at the scene of the French riots destroying historical monuments? Does France have a knot to untie? Sending in the military to suppress doesn't seem quite right, it's terrible, it's just terrible. And to be honest, if you say this is a student protest now, ghosts would believe it—what kind of students hold Palestinian flags, what kind of Communist flags? Those are not students, those are rioters, those are terrorists. Those Palestinian supporters are all terrorists, because Hamas is a terrorist organization, recognized as a terrorist organization by many international organizations. If you are truly helping students fight for their rights, you should hold the French flag, not the flag of a terrorist organization. I think there's no saving this. Then, the destruction of historical monuments—this building was something built by people after Napoleon's political legacy era, constructed around 186 something, a very beautiful building, and it gets destroyed like this. It reminds me of those BLM riots, because clearly everyone knows about George Floyd, they said it was police brutality. If you look now, whether at police reports or court documents, you will see that George Floyd himself overdosed on drugs, he OD'd, OD means he took too many drugs, and then he died. He didn't die because the police put their foot on his neck, put their knee on his neck—that is the police SOP, they all follow the SOP. But because it blew up, then riots broke out, how much was looted, how much was burned? And at that time, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz said everything was peaceful. And now there is a bunch of communists. You say use the military to suppress, it should be the police, this requires deploying the police. I personally do not agree with using the military to suppress ordinary citizens taking to the streets, but the police need to be tough; those who should be arrested must be arrested, those who should be sentenced must be sentenced. Aren't they fond of intensive surveillance? Then the surveillance footage should be dug out, and those who went to burn, to steal, to rob—and you know what, you hold the flag of a terrorist organization to burn things, and then you expect me to sympathize with students? They are not students, to be real. If you are defending your rights and fighting for your own power, that's fine, but once you start stealing, looting, and burning, then it is wrong. Look at what a peaceful demonstration is, fighting for your own rights through peaceful protest while standing together with local businesses and citizens—look at how the people of Hong Kong protested, one million people taking to the streets and it was completely peaceful, yet the CCP wanted to suppress them. But here, you guys are not being suppressed; you go steal and loot yourselves like thugs—no, not thugs, like barbarians, just barbarians, looting things on the street today, and then you expect me to sympathize with students? Hold on a second, that is just wrong. You know what? Last time, the statue of the hero who advocated for the liberation of black slaves in Poland was pulled down by those BLM rioters in Washington, D.C., and then spray-painted. You want me to support you? You are destroying public property, you are beating people up, you are burning things and setting fires, you are destroying historical monuments—that is just wrong. You won't make normal people support you. Some people say use the military; I don't think the military should be used, but the police need to come out. The police need to come out, historical monuments must be saved, and those key buildings—in fact, those crucial livelihood and historical monument sites—might need the military to surround them and prevent these terrorist organization supporters from rushing in. This is a basic public safety issue, just like in LA back then, the US also dispatched the National Guard, which is the militia. My god, I just find this so barbaric.

The problem in France and Europe is the number of refugees—though those are not refugees either, those people are not refugees. Refugees are escaping danger; those are immigrants coming to improve their own living environments, but immigrants who don't take the proper immigration route, abusing the political asylum system.

Islam has different branches too; we must separate religion from culture. Islam in Central Asia, Islam in Turkey, Islam in Saudi Arabia, and Islam in Pakistan are quite different. I think culture and a country's development are often more related to each other than religion itself, not religion itself. I'm not arguing—I study the Uyghurs, a Muslim group, and you shouldn't attribute a religion belonging to billions of people to the exact same thing, as if it's all one. It has branches, it has developments in different countries. For example, if we discuss Christianity, Russia broke away from Christianity, but it says it is Christian—that's Eastern Orthodoxy. True Christianity does not advocate killing, but Russian Eastern Orthodoxy does. Yet you cannot say that the things Russia does are a problem inherent to Christianity; you just can't. Similarly, Hamas terrorists do not represent all Muslims, nor do they represent all branches of Islam, nor all Muslim cultural countries. We should treat each case on its merits and make finer distinctions, because there are too many people involved. Furthermore, many Muslims are anti-communist, and many Muslims do not support atheism. Muslim groups and the Muslim population actually have a huge potential—many are potential allies of the democratic camp. Right now, many Islamic countries stand with the US, and many stand with the Western camp as well. Therefore, we must make distinctions; alright, alright, we must make distinctions.

Well, how long have we been live-streaming, where can I watch it? I mainly wanted to talk about these two topics, let's take a look, I'll read everyone's messages, let me check our horizontal screen, what our horizontal screen looks like, and then wrap up today's live stream. Alright, give me just a second, let me check everyone's messages here, I was just looking at the vertical one.

If you have a brand and you have products, I am very supportive, welcome, welcome, I am willing, come, come, come. Aren't you going to find me for sponsored content? Then, for the things I developed myself, they all say the content is too sensitive, anti-communist, you're doing great, but keep it up, our company has considerations, that's just how it is. You can do sponsored content, if you have products you're welcome, I guarantee my sponsored content is effective and very good. You can check out my sponsored content for the VPN, look at how seriously I promoted the scientific association, and we also helped a pillow company—just occasionally, very few sponsorships, but it can't support ourselves. Although we can make merchandise, I'll tell you the troublesome problem: because we don't have a team, we are too busy just doing the content part, we don't have assistants. Then for merchandise you have to ship, you have to issue invoices, you have to handle customer service, and after-sales service; you need at least two people, at least. We don't, we can't afford to hire. And some people have hired people, but manufacturing also requires money to buy things, we don't have it. I'm telling you, what we earn is basically, you know, burned up on travel expenses, plane tickets are expensive, everything is expensive, and everywhere we are thinking about how we can manage. We do have some supporters who let us make more content, but the Taiwan media is also stingy, they don't give money. Last time there was a speech by Hsiao Bi-khim with millions of views, and not a single Taiwanese media outlet paid me a licensing fee, not one. There was a documentary director who bought a license from me, but it was just 100 US dollars, what can that do? Does going to Belgium cost money? Driving for several hours, do accommodation and lodging cost money? A team is very important, but we don't have one, we can't afford to hire a team. So we can only rely on everyone giving strong support, promoting us, and helping us become mainstream. If we become mainstream, we will definitely do very well, I guarantee we will do very well because the content is excellent, and Taiwan really needs this kind of content. And honestly, people who have commercial dealings with me are all very satisfied, everyone is very satisfied, but you really have to understand the two of us, we focus on content, we focus on making content. As for other things, if there are resources, I'm willing, great, excellent, I have a lot of ideas, but it requires resources, it's just stuck at the resource part. Alright, let's stop here for now. Is there really any right wing in Germany? Nominally right, but Germany's so-called right is not the right, and their far-right is also the far-left. AfD is a bunch of terrible people, it's a terrible political party, even the French right-wing doesn't dare to touch such a terrible party. Alright, our live stream today ends here, please continue to support our News Hard-hitting, we will continue to make excellent content for everyone. Today's Super Chat didn't have a topic tag, so for next week's live stream, we'll see you on Sunday as usual, or maybe I can shoot a video instead of going home. Alright, let's stop here, see you next week, hope everyone rests early, rest early.

Key events timeline · Selected related nodes
Related topics political resistance Chiang Wan-an Shen Boyang Taipei City Shezi Island
Related posts
Replies (0)

No replies yet — be the first to comment

Post a reply

Register and finish the probation period to post here
To guard against attacks and disruption by CCP troll armies and bot accounts, new accounts must complete a probation period and pass a community rules exam before posting.