Xi Jinping collapses and rushes back to Beijing! Closed-door meetings break down, the Chinese delegation leaves empty-handed, and does Cai Qi seize power at the Fifth Plenary Session? US bombers twice fly right over Xi's head, and Little Pinks weep collectively

The video discusses the political details and symbolic significance of Xi Jinping's visit to the White House, focusing on how Trump used high-level military honors—including arranging B-1 and B-2 bomber escorts and a tour of the helipad—to deter Xi through a mix of grace and might. The program also points out that during the closed-door meetings, the U.S. and China talked past each other on the Taiwan issue, while Rubio issued a joint statement with Japan and South Korea regarding Taiwan at the UN General Assembly in New York. Furthermore, the list of accompanying personnel reflected that the U.S. did not provide the Chinese side with opportunities to connect with tech enterprises. The entire visit was in essence a game full of probing, warnings, and interest-swapping.

Video link:

Full text:

So, today I have bravely stood my ground, speaking out for the millions of Chinese people who have suffered unfair treatment. Do you know? Just a few days before the pro-CCP media, those political commentators, and those pro-CCP Kuomintang members were brainwashing people about Trump taking Taiwan to make a deal with Xi Jinping, Xi Jinping hadn't even walked into the White House that night when U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio first discussed the Taiwan issue with the foreign ministers of Japan and South Korea at the UN General Assembly in New York. The U.S., Japan, and South Korea jointly issued a statement, once again emphasizing peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, opposing any unilateral changes to the status quo by force or coercion, and supporting Taiwan's meaningful participation in appropriate international organizations. Now, why was this statement made public right before the Trump-Xi meeting, and why did Taiwan's pro-CCP media dare not mention this part? Because the U.S. probably knew long ago that what Xi Jinping truly wanted to get from Trump during this visit to Washington wasn't just some trade agreement, AI, or future new battlefields. What Xi Jinping wanted more was to test an important matter: whether Trump, for the sake of these tariffs, rare earths, artificial intelligence, the Chinese market, and the midterm elections, would be willing to make concessions on these issues, including Taiwan, allowing Beijing to get just a little bit closer, right? Ideally, he also wanted the CCP's overseas propaganda to clip together a video of a great victory showing Chairman Xi personally taking the lead and the U.S. backing down.

What is even more intriguing is the line drawn for Taiwan by Rubio during the UN General Assembly in New York, right? Yet, Trump rolled out the red carpet for Xi Jinping in Washington. On one hand, he warned Beijing not to unilaterally change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait by force; on the other, he welcomed Xi Jinping with gun salutes, state dinners, military honors, and bombers. So, is the United States actually protecting Taiwan, or is it preparing to put Taiwan on the negotiating table? Let's not rush to a conclusion; I will explain the parts we didn't finish yesterday in detail later. Because the seemingly friendly scenes that follow actually contain respect, probing, warnings, and deals. Where is the most brilliant and human part? Xi Jinping needs a reception of the highest standard to take back to Beijing, proving that he can still stand on equal footing with the United States. The Fifth Plenary Session and the 21st Party Congress will still choose me, Xi, or people from my faction; of course, it could also be one of the signs of supporting cronies like Cai Qi to enter the layout for succession. Trump also needs a huge, magnificent performance. He needs to prove to the American people that even though we are clashing to this extent now, we can be on good terms if we say so, and bad terms if we say so. The top leader of China has come to our DC, and is even willing to provide orders, more orders, rare earths, and what else, sonic aircraft, right? They even put a plane on that negotiating table. Okay, so this midterm election still goes to our Republican Party. What really surprised me was not just that Trump arranged for a B-1 bomber to fly over Xi Jinping's head; when Xi Jinping officially arrived at the White House, the U.S. dispatched a B-2 stealth strategic bomber and four F-22s, along with other aircraft, over the White House and Xi Jinping's head.

Laugh it off. Yesterday, someone challenged me, or rather reminded me, saying, 'Hey, the slightly exaggerated expression on Trump's face when he saw the B-1 bomber was because he couldn't stand the loud noise brought by the plane.' Right, Trump couldn't stand it, but Xi Jinping could, and the two wives beside them, including the director's wife Peng Liyuan, could stand it. But looking at the footage, Trump's actions looked more like he was gesturing to make a reasonable expression for Xi Jinping to look up. 'Oh, it's so loud, look there, oh, I can't stand it, eh. Little brother Xi, how can your ears stand it? Oh, so you can't hear it, right?' Of course, some people also asked, why does Xi Jinping need someone to support him every time he goes abroad recently? Because he's wearing sky-high heels! One moment you are as tall as Zeng Liwen, the next you are as tall as Ma Ying-jeou, and now you are as tall as the 190cm Trump, so of course you need someone to support you! Have you ever seen someone on stilts not needing support? We certainly cannot climb into Trump's head to determine his meaning, but we can guess, we can speculate, right? But, if we put the entire arrangement of military aircraft together, is it really just an ordinary reception? This is the most interesting part of politics; many things are not written in press releases, but are hidden in the expressions, positioning, order of appearance, and symbolic details of the figures. When Xi Jinping and the director's wife Peng Liyuan... the teacher lets you pat her butt, so you pat her butt. Touching at night, Xi Jinping's home. Xi Jinping, do you know? I was sunning myself in someone's bathroom yesterday. When he officially arrived at the White House, there was a scene where Peng Liyuan was seen by protesters, and the scene was in an uproar; it was truly a great pity. Peng Liyuan, the director's wife, because she has been NTR'd by Xi Jinping now, didn't hear this part, so we added this part in post-production for everyone to enjoy, let's listen to it. Today, if you don't fuck Xi Jinping's wife, you might as well fuck her immediately. I know what my wife is doing.

Jokes aside, we need to get back to the main topic. The ceremony Trump arranged was not just an ordinary state welcome; it was a state visit on a scale approaching a military exhibition. Note that the B-2 is the exact same stealth bomber used by the U.S. in Operation Midnight Hammer to strike underground nuclear facilities in Iran. It is undetectable by global satellites, including the Beidou system, and all radar. So, the level of this protocol was even higher than that for Putin. Trump only showed the B-2 to Putin, but for Xi Jinping, you saw not only the B-2 but also the B-1. Put them together, and Trump is reminding you, Xi Jinping, that it is time to take your Vitamin B12. At this point, some might say: during U.S. Independence Day or high-profile sports games, B-2 bombers are often arranged to fly over, symbolizing the great rejuvenation of America. So, this was also a gift from the U.S. to Xi Jinping. Well, you might be half right. Military bomber flyovers can indeed be a ceremony, that is true. But the question is not whether there was a flyover, but what aircraft the U.S. chose, who was watching, and who the intended audience was. For U.S. citizens, the appearance of a B-2 during Independence Day or a major sports game conveys: I, Trump, am an American, the U.S. military are Americans, and you are also American citizens. You are on American soil, and I have dispatched the military power that Americans are most proud of—which you are also proud of—for everyone to see, representing our rise as a great power. Because this aircraft is not just owned by Trump and the U.S. military; your taxpayer money also helped build this B-2 bomber, which is the envy of the world. This is a completely different nature! Sending this out is to let the American people see their own strength, not to intimidate the American people by saying, 'I might bomb you.' That is not it. But are Putin and Xi Jinping ordinary American citizens? Although their families might be, they are not. Therefore, the nature of what is being displayed to them is different. Do not paint everything with the same brush. Is the psychological starting point of showing them bombers they want but cannot obtain the same as showing the public the aircraft their own tax dollars built? One is challenging NATO on European security, and now Trump wants to hand NATO over to the EU to manage in Europe, because that is your sphere of influence. But can the Taiwan Strait be treated the same way?

We do not even need to mention the second and third island chains; just look at how many U.S. military bases are in the first island chain. Can these really be the same thing? Your AI bot army technology, please stop using things like DeepSeek, and those 'Moonlight Shadow' or 'Pretty Cure' things—you do not need to use them. Besides, isn't the backend just scraping U.S. AI data anyway? Of course, this does not mean the U.S. is preparing to go to war with China, nor will China rashly go to war with the U.S. They are doing this precisely to avoid a hot war. I will explain this later using actual cases from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, and by the way, slap the faces of those who think otherwise. While using both kindness and severity, telling him about our U.S. military symbols while simultaneously incorporating them into this state banquet—that is the high-level move! I gave you face, and I gave you substance, but within this substance and face, I also gave you a 'tight shoe' to wear. You are clearly uncomfortable wearing the shoe, but you cannot pinpoint where I am humiliating you, and you cannot speak of it. So why, when the Japanese Prime Minister, the British King, and the Saudi Arabian Crown Prince came to the U.S. to see Trump, did you not see the same combination of bombers? You didn't, right? Because the answer is exactly the opposite. Japan and the U.K. are strategic partners of the U.S., and even host U.S. military bases. Saudi Arabia is also not the U.S.'s primary military competitor right now; it still relies on them to contain Iran. The U.S. does not need to use B-2 bombers to remind them, right? But that does not mean these crown princes or leaders of other countries received lower treatment than Xi Jinping. Do you need to show your biggest guns to your allies? So when people like Sanae Takaichi or the British King come, the U.S. flyovers consist of F-22s, F-16s, or even F-35s, but they will absolutely never be strategic bombers.

Ah, let us return to the welcome ceremony. Back then at the White House, facing all the cameras, Trump turned to Xi Jinping and said something very important. He said, as Xi knows, ever since Xi's last visit to the United States until now, many things have changed. There are numerous interpretations online, but the core logic remains the same. What do some people say? Trump meant that since you last came here, I have changed many things, including the reconstruction of the White House, the new helicopter hangar, the banquet hall, and the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States. But others also say: "Oh, you came here before." The feeling between our two countries is different from now! Whether you choose grace or might in the future is up to you. And right now, you are standing before a second-term Trump; if you like to put on a smiling face with me, I will do the same with you. What else? Look at this, every time the two sides finish talking, has the actual relationship gotten closer? Or has it decoupled even more? I believe I don't need to explain this; anyone with eyes can see it! His words had many double entendres, open to individual interpretation. But the key point is what Xi Jinping is thinking; that is what matters. In his speech, Xi stated that China and the U.S. must hold the bottom line of no conflict and no confrontation, that the two militaries should normalize communication channels, and improve mechanisms for resolving and preventing crises. He also mentioned once again his favorite topic—whether the Thucydides Trap can be overcome? Well, I don't know if anyone is interested; I won't go into too much detail here.

In any case, Xi Jinping's tone this time was indeed much softer than his usual speeches inside China. Some noticed that at the scene, he even directly called the U.S. cabinet officials and leaders, respected President Trump and Melania, as well as the various U.S. cabinet ministers and leaders—something he had never said before. What would he usually say? Comrades, gentlemen, and ladies. But what does Beijing actually want to see? It is for the U.S. to recognize China's sphere of influence, including the South China Sea and Taiwan. This is also why Xi Jinping can now be in his third term, and since his third term hasn't solved the Taiwan question, what is the new logic for his fourth term? Wang Huning is helping him figure it out. And this time, Xi Jinping—do you know how outrageous he was? He tied the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation together with Trump's Make America Great Again. He said these two goals can run parallel and mutually achieve each other. Translated into the political language of power, it means: You, Trump, can achieve MAGA in America, but I am building a new East Asian Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere belonging to China in Asia, and you don't need to stop me. With the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, the Chinese people have stood up, and I can also help you fulfill orders. I can continue to exploit my labor force through centralization, allowing you Americans to achieve low-cost success. You no longer need to cede jobs to Vietnam, India, or Indonesia; for the political results you need in the midterm elections, I can temporarily help you achieve them. In the future, you must promise that I am part of a community with a shared future for mankind—the words sound very pretty, right?

However, where should Xi Jinping have said these words the most? Shouldn't he have said them at that UN leaders' summit meeting a few days ago, which even Sanae Takaichi attended? He didn't go there to say it; instead, he ran off to have a two-person world talk with Trump about how to divide things up. So who do you think is cowardly? Sure enough, following this closed-door meeting between China and the U.S., the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs released a summary containing an extremely sensitive piece of text. It said: "Xi Jinping hopes the U.S. side will adhere to the correct position of opposing Taiwan independence and handle the Taiwan question prudently." Notice that Beijing wrote this time that Xi Jinping made a request to oppose Taiwan independence, rather than using the U.S.'s long-standing phrasing of "not supporting Taiwan independence." Opposing Taiwan independence and not supporting Taiwan independence are actually quite different political discourses. "Not supporting Taiwan independence" means the U.S. does not encourage Taiwan to unilaterally declare de jure independence from the status quo. By de jure independence, I mean breaking away from the framework of the Republic of China, but at the same time, there is a condition attached: the Five-Star Red Flag of the People's Republic of China is also not allowed to use force, united front tactics, or even encirclement. This has been passed by the U.S. Congress: do not change the status quo across the Taiwan Strait. If you change it, you, China, will also be kicked out of the international financial payment system at any moment. And the current status quo is that the Republic of China governs Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu; this status quo cannot be changed. To the CCP, this is also a form of Taiwan independence. So, does Beijing want to make it clear? Is the Taiwan independence it does not support the same kind of Taiwan independence as that Republic of China on Taiwan you talk about—the Type B Taiwan independence—are they the same Taiwan independence? Do you dare to speak plainly and make it clear? You dare not.

Even those pro-CCP people, after they finish talking, what will they continue to buy? U.S. stocks, Taiwan stocks, and even U.S. chip stocks like UMC. Then they continue to send their children to the United States. What is even more dangerous is that Beijing's definition of Taiwan independence can be continuously expanded. Today it might declare de jure Taiwan independence, tomorrow it could add things like Taiwan increasing its defense budget, participating in international organizations, deepening Taiwan-U.S. relations, and rejecting "one country, two systems," defining all of them as Taiwan independence, depending on its needs. Therefore, what we truly need to observe is not how the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Chinese Communist Party writes its statements, but the stance of the U.S. government, including Congress, moving forward. How will they act jointly? So if someone takes the words of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Chinese Communist Party to tell you, "Look, on Twitter they have already opposed Taiwan independence," that is merely wishful thinking on the Chinese side. Delaying signing and refusing to sign are two different things; sooner or forth, within the deadline, he will have to sign. Will there be any changes in Taiwan-U.S. security cooperation, and has the United States begun to publicly pressure Taiwan into accepting Beijing's political conditions? If we look back at Marco Rubio's actions in New York, you will find that this is a pre-set safeguard.还有一个重中之重，应该也是中国民众跟我们台湾人比较关心的，就是中美的AI科技发展，因为这这这也牵涉到我们的台股啊。Trump described it externally as a fantastic meeting, but he did not answer immediately, but where can we find out?

After the dinner meeting ended, Trump did something that very much fit his personal character: he personally led Xi Jinping to the South Lawn of the White House to visit the newly completed granite helicopter pad. Of course, it was just a visit; he didn't let Xi Jinping test-fly anything. A closer image is: I am a host showing a potentially dangerous guest around my home turf. I have this, do you? Would you like to refer to this performance of mine? Remember when Zhang Youxia visited the U.S. in the past and exchanged views with the U.S. military, praising the U.S. military's forces, saying, "This weapon is something our country's People's Liberation Army can hardly catch up with"? Would Xi Jinping dare to say such a thing? Or would he even understand it? What is worth paying attention to? The hilarious scene came when, after finishing the tour of the helicopter pad, Trump publicly told the media that Xi Jinping knows a lot about stone materials and is a stone material expert, particularly knowledgeable about granite—truly hilarious. In the past, the Ming dynasty had a carpenter emperor, and now China has a stonemason emperor. At that time when I was sent down to the countryside, besides carrying wheat and sleeping deeply, at night I had to study granite. Xi Jinping, you don't need to serve another term; hurry up and retire to become a stonemason. Maybe you will really become a world-renowned stonemason artist.

Well, after the commotion of the evening, the state banquet switched to a completely different linguistic mode! If daytime used military deterrence, nighttime language was the exchange of history, culture, and interests. The White House specially chose the toast for peace from Richard Nixon's visit to Beijing in 1972, using the exact same American sparkling wine. Hey, this wasn't chosen at random; it has political implications. It aims to awaken the historical memory of the 1972 Sino-U.S. ice-breaking, alter the power structure of the Cold War era, and contain whom? To contain the Soviet Union, of course! This depends on whether Xi Jinping is willing to devolve power and rein in military expansion in Asia, and most importantly, stop overcapacity and massive low-priced exports to European and American markets. But the biggest difference today compared to 1972 is that the China-U.S. relations back then required the strength of both sides to check the Soviet Union; don't think only the U.S. wanted to check them. The China-Soviet conflict almost led to a nuclear war back then; you can all go back and check the Sino-Soviet border conflict. And today's People's Republic of China has become the primary target that the U.S. faces in military and various supply chain fields, just like the former Soviet Union. Therefore, the wine on the table symbolizes peace, and the daytime skipped part was a reminder to Xi Jinping that peace does not come without conditions. The menu of the state banquet naturally also blended American and Chinese ingredients, giving Xi Jinping plenty of cultural confidence and face, but it also constantly reminded him that this is my American home turf. How so? After the state banquet toast, Trump gave Xi Jinping a sculpture of an American bald eagle, using both hands to signal that Xi Jinping should stand up and applaud, and Xi Jinping actually stood up and applauded.

If Xi Jinping were at his Fifth Plenary Session, who would dare let him do this? Of course, the bald eagle is an official state gift; it is not a statue, nor is it a living bald eagle. Naturally, if Trump had said when gifting this bald eagle to Xi Jinping, 'Hey, but isn't it true that nothing can fly in your Beijing?' Wow, if he had said that, I would give him a hundred thumbs up. It's a statue, are you an idiot? Of course I know, I am mocking you, you are the real idiot, aren't you? Also, we just mentioned the AI thing earlier, and the US-China trade relationship. But this meeting wasn't about US-China trade, was it? How should I put it? Xi Jinping and his wife sat with American entrepreneurs including Musk, Jensen Huang, the retired Tim Cook, and people like Zuckerberg and other important figures from the American financial sector. But we didn't see the people the CCP had been hyping up—I mean, I want to bring our Lei Jun and Xiaomi, and those BYD people to the US too—no, they weren't there. This time, there were none at all; they were all Americans. Look at electric vehicles, space technology, satellites, chips, artificial intelligence, and semiconductors, Apple phones, and other tech giants. The computing power is all from my American people at your event, and you, Xi Jinping, couldn't bring a single entrepreneur from the tech fields you want to cooperate with us on. Hey, this is the most important point. Of course, the Little Pinks can twist this in another way, saying this is the American CEOs collectively coming to pay homage to Xi Jinping. Of course, if you want to think that way, then your per capita GDP will continue to be stuck at 13,000, on par with Mexico. Think about it again, why was the Chinese side always whining over there before? 'I want to reserve half of the dinner for our own Chinese entrepreneurs.' So what does this prove? It slaps the Little Pinks' narrative in the face! Xi Jinping certainly hopes to engage with the most important technological forces in the US. But he wanted to bring his own people to connect! However, the US President didn't give him that opportunity to connect! So you can see where the problem lies. The people attending the dinner from the Chinese side were all political figures, including Cai Qi, Wang Yi, and He Lifeng. There was no one from Alibaba, Tencent, BYD, CATL, Xiaomi, or those people from China's AI, DeepSeek! Oh, look, Trump gave Xi Jinping such a grand display. But do you know? During the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the US, leaders from both sides visited each other. Soviet leaders personally greeted US presidents at the airport, and US leaders also personally greeted Soviet leaders. Both sides exchanged state gifts and gave each other the highest-level red carpet treatment. So, would you say the relationship between the two countries was very good? When Khrushchev visited the US, Eisenhower personally greeted him at the airport, and the two even took the presidential helicopter together to tour Washington. When Gorbachev arrived in Washington in 1987, Reagan also welcomed him with full military honors and a 21-gun salute. So, would you say the US-Soviet relationship was friendly and cooperative? Therefore, just saying things like that, and the narrative pushed by those internet trolls, is completely nonsensical, isn't it? They want to avoid a hot war, but they are still opponents and competitors. So, for this US-China dialogue, everyone should not misjudge. This historical trend and context will not change. So what both sides want is the simplest thing. Xi Jinping needs to use this opportunity in October and for the 20th next year to tell all of China: 'Only I can make Trump and the US treat me like this, so let me or Cai Qi continue to stay in power.' And what Trump wants is for the midterm elections and the next person pushed by the Republican Party to continue to lead the US. We need to control risks regarding the areas where we compete, where we can still cooperate, and where we exchange interests, so that we don't misjudge and drag the whole world into a nuclear war. We always rely on our own people. Today, taking a step back, even if we in Taiwan had alien technology, we have moles, and those people who bribe the military, and those who issue ID cards, and assistants who leak secrets—congressional assistants and members of Congress—they turn around and hand it over to Beijing. So what use is it if we have more B-12s? The video ends here. If you like this video, don't forget to help me share it. I am Number Eight Little Scumbag.