[Lude Media] Xi Jinping and the CCP's visit to the "National Archives" is like a fishbone stuck in the throat with no way out: Why did Trump say the results were remarkable? Lee Jae-myung jumping around like "Huang Jiguang" only makes a fool of himself 9/26/2026

This episode reviews the various details of Xi Jinping's visit to the United States, focusing on his tour of the U.S. National Archives and the experience of receiving historical document narratives (such as the Treaty of Wanghia). It points out that the U.S. side used subtle tactics, such as carefully selected treaties and the bald eagle statue, to strike a heavy blow against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). At the same time, it explores the propaganda from Xinhua News Agency and the Chinese Embassy in the U.S., the sophistry of Hu Xijin, and a series of actions including Trump's swift phone call with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and the maintenance of his unchanged policy toward Taiwan.

Video link:

Full text:

Alright, welcome to our Lude Media Dr. Yan program for September 26, 2026. Today, the most important thing is to provide a final verdict on President Xi's visit to the United States, right? Although we have been following his footsteps and doing daily analyses, and everyone says they had a very happy Mid-Autumn Festival—I did too, right?—this matter cannot just be closed the moment he boards the plane, right? Look, the CCP's propaganda is still coming out in waves, and we also need to see how those in the U.S. who understand the CCP are reacting, and whether it aligns with what we are saying. Then, we also need to look at some interesting details. For example, President Xi's visit to the National Archives, which is now a bone in his throat that he is unwilling to face—we really need to dig into these details for everyone; it is truly very interesting. Today, Mr. Ye Wanhui posted a tweet saying that the visit to the National Archives, the song from Les Misérables, and the B-2 bomber flying overhead just as he got off the plane were his three favorite highlights of this Trump-Xi meeting, right? We basically like these points the most too, right? But we still have many other points that haven't been fully discussed, and we will fill those in for everyone in a moment. Oh, it's so interesting, really! Over the past two days, I have been thinking repeatedly—it's like when people study "Dream of the Red Chamber" and try to figure out if the original first eighty chapters by Cao Xueqin can match what others wrote later—do we have that kind of energy? Does the foreshadowing at the beginning manifest in the end, right? How is this person's fate determined? How should that detail be interpreted? Oh, I am actually able to feel that the Trump-Xi meeting, which lasted only two days in total, is full of hidden traps everywhere, just like "Dream of the Red Chamber." It's truly a surprise, isn't it?

Alright, first let's say hello to our audience and to In Y. Remember to like the video before listening to the lecture. Okay, let's take a look. This is from Xinhua News Agency. Xinhua always has to hype things up even when there's nothing to report, right? So they edited this video for President Xi, which is actually quite funny. Look, it's very short, just over three minutes. "Carrying forward the past and opening up the future, a journey of ten thousand miles"—this part is about the airport pickup, right? The pickup segment alone takes up nearly a minute. Then, let me see if they included that part where the B-2 bomber flew over and Xi's expression... Oh, they even included some shots for the United Front. Look, they put in the salute, right? Ah, compare this—you can't really see Xi's expression from the side, and they dared to include it. Because if you see the expression, like with Trump, he's smiling, but Xi looks like a wooden chicken. Hey, Trump is talking to him and he's just standing there blankly. Xinhua is very cunning; they didn't dare to edit that part in, right? And then, look at this reporter from Xinhua, no wonder they were fighting for the center spot at the White House—just to get some positive photos of Xi. It's really not easy, is it? Ah, isn't this after Xi arrived and gave his speech? And then, isn't this where they are watching the B-2 flyover? Right? Oh, and then after this, the whole thing... after they exchanged gifts with Trump, it went to internal talks and wasn't public anymore, right? And this is Xi giving a speech at the state banquet. They didn't mention that they played music from Les Misérables at the state banquet. Honestly, not to mention that the meal at the White House was already enough to make one 'recall the bitterness of the past,' you should have put more effort into respecting the carefully selected music, right? This was personally overseen by the First Lady. You don't mention that either? And, let me see, how come there's no footage of the moment Trump gave the gift to Xi? The famous eagle catching a snake... the eagle statue on the tree... Ah, speaking of this, it's interesting.

Did you notice that the eagle statue, when viewed from a distance, actually looks like it's standing on a tree branch? I told you all in the members-only show this morning that I repeatedly zoomed in and looked at it from different angles. It looks a lot like a snake, did you see that? In reality, it is indeed a tree branch. Because, whether you look at the footage of Trump's speech or anything else, no one said, 'I am giving you a sculpture of an eagle catching a snake.' Do you remember what Trump said at the time? Trump said in his speech, 'This statue is the American national bird, the bald eagle. I give it to you. My First Lady and I really like this statue. The artist made it specifically for this; we think it's very creative.' But you tell me, who wouldn't think it's a statue of a snake being caught when looking at it from afar, right? And let me tell you, it's not just us Chinese who understand this; foreigners who know a little bit about Chinese culture also know this trope. For example, Mr. Moore, right? And like Steve—well, not Steve, Solomon Yue. He said that since Solomon Yue is Chinese, right? He said there are no coincidences in politics, and 'I will add this American eagle statue to your list.' He was replying to Mr. Ye Wanhui's comment about how he likes the 'humiliating treaty,' the Les Misérables song, and the low-altitude flyover—those three things, right? And then Solomon Yue said he would add the American eagle statue to the list. We know Xi Jinping was born in 1953, and 1953 is the Year of the Snake. This gift is a curse. The American eagle is hunting the snake that is the CCP. And look here, Mr. Moore also directly replied to this tweet. Mr. Moore said that both Mao and Xi were born in the Year of the Snake. In the West, the snake is seen as a symbol of evil; in China, it is seen as a 'little dragon,' but that doesn't mean it's kind. The snake's personality is complex and mysterious, often used as a symbol of witchcraft, meticulous, hard to fathom, and always hiding its true intentions. Of course, there are many people born in the Year of the Snake, so our audience shouldn't take this personally, right? It's not our turn to take this personally. But it's just about this matter, because this eagle wasn't given to our audience, right? You can just watch the joke. So, Mr. Moore said these descriptions are, in my opinion, quite fitting, absolutely. By the way, our audience can look it up online; actually, many Feng Shui masters also say that for people born in the Year of the Snake, for example, many big bosses in our country like to hang paintings of an eagle spreading its wings in their offices, right? To prove their 'great roc spreading its wings to fly high,' etc. Actually, in Hong Kong, some Feng Shui masters say that if you are born in the Year of the Snake, you shouldn't hang pictures of eagles in your room, because an eagle catching a snake is a thing. You see, it's very obvious that the Xi family likes these iconic things so much, it's impossible they don't recognize this, right?

Remember to come, and we'll do a special review for everyone. Nomiantuan brought back out the Louder Network broadcast from January 29, 2022—four and a half years ago, close to five years ago. Back then in 2022, at the beginning of the lunar new year, Zhao Lijian said "full of vim and vigor, soaring dragons and leaping tigers, with wings added to a tiger." Based on Ray's intelligence and understanding of Ray, the Louder Network specifically analyzed: how should this be understood? They said Ren Farong fortune-told for Xi, right? Xi, who was born in the Year of the Snake, would face a trial in this water-tiger year of 2022, so it was said back then that only by taking Taiwan in 2022 could he ascend to a dragon; by ascending to a dragon, the snake transforming into a dragon could survive the trial. Besides that, what was another allusion? It was a story the Xi family themselves firmly believed in called "The Story of the Tiger," where a plot involved Xi Baiyu, right? Traditional characters for Baiyu, so Xi wanted to add wings to the white tiger. Anyway, so you see, Zhao Lijian's "full of vim and vigor" didn't mean the dragon was lively, but rather that a dragon needed to be born—after the snake survived the trial, a dragon would be born, and then in the living tiger, Xi would add wings to the white tiger, right? So it was tiger leaping and dragon soaring, with wings added to a tiger. That meant in 2022, right? Oh, wishing that Xi would next get Taiwan into his hands, however it might be, his trial would pass, and in the water-tiger year he could add wings to the white tiger, and then he would no longer be a snake, but a true Son of Heaven. Gosh, their family really believes in this kind of stuff! Oh, I remember when Ray gave us this intelligence back then, my jaw dropped when I listened to it. Oh, we didn't expect it either, right? Every day they say no spirits can be formed after the founding of the state, yet the top leaders themselves take the lead in forming spirits. Just think about this: only the magistrates are allowed to burn lamps while the common people are forbidden to light fires—is there any reason in this, right? Where can you go to reason about it?

And then, look at this. Nomiantuan directly summarized it in real time, right? Saying, look, Xi deeply believed in the fortune-telling by Ren Farong, the trial of the water-tiger year 2022. As a result, just after Zhao Lijian was hospitalized in January 2022, the Louder Network shared the May 14 recording in May, as well as the Ghost Month operation that followed, the Air Force uprising, the one whose code name was Huang Yi something, right? The air force uprising wanting to fly an F-16 to Beijing, with a bounty of 100 million RMB, right? If there was a defecting F-16, they would give 100 million, etc. All of this top-level intelligence, we shared it all with everyone, and solidly shared it with U.S. intelligence departments too, right? As a result, when Pelosi visited Taiwan on August 1st, with aircraft carriers escorting her, right? Afterwards, first, his airplane was spinning around in the sky, its signal directly jammed, and it couldn't find North—it really couldn't find North. His own plane experienced a ghost hitting the wall, and then again, finally lowered its head to act fake, directly unloading the armored vehicles that had been loaded into the roll-on/roll-off ships, right? Satellites even photographed it: sneaking around when loading, swaggering around when unloading at Qingdao Port, and anyway they didn't fight anymore, right? Oh, success on the first鼓作气, wanes on the second, and is exhausted on the third. So do you see it, right? Oh, what we say on the Louder Network is down-to-earth, unlike that Guo Wengui stuff, who is fake anti-communist, let alone those unworthy ones like Yao Chen, or Wang Zhian who slaps his own face every few days, right? Whatever we talk about, as long as you follow it through, what it tells is simply a logic and a verification, isn't that right?

So look at this. Now, let's talk about how the visit of Xi Jinping to the United States was meticulously planned down to every single detail, with the belief that his protocol department had coordinated everything thoroughly with the U.S. After all, making such a visit means he had accepted it, thinking he had managed to lock down the itinerary within a controllable range, right? Look, there were no on-site reporters asking questions, and no extended situations where Trump could trap him in front of reporters and make a fool of him. He made full preparations when he came, just like Khamenei, you know, building his bunker, underground tunnels, and fortress-like structures. When the CCP helped him build it, they made sure it was blast-proof, explosion-proof, earthquake-resistant, and so on. But who would have thought that right through the roof—thirty U.S. missiles would pierce straight in, completely unstoppable, and *boom*, he'd be sublimated. So Xi's trip to the U.S. is equivalent to him thinking he had fortified every single angle, only for Trump to prepare thirty missiles for you, right? Although Xi's physical body hasn't sublimated yet, I feel like this move definitely slaughters a large portion of their enterprises. As for why there are still some left unkilled, didn't we say Xi has a slow reaction time? He has to go back and slowly process it. It's about a psychological blow; you see, to deliver a psychological blow, you have to wait until the other party understands it before it hits home, right? You have to wait until the other party internalizes it. When you want to deal a psychological blow to Xi, you have to give him some reaction time—it's not that fast, you understand? He has to go back and slowly ponder whether that B2 flying over his head was actually a polite welcome or not. Was the song from Les Misérables praising Xi for reading all of Hugo's books, or was it giving Xi a warning that you, kid, only have one day left on the countdown? He still has to ponder that meal he had at the White House, which looked so fancy, right? Imagine, the White House used a rose-red tablecloth, and then the CCP went around bragging, "Oh, to welcome Xi, they specially used China Red." You guys really know how to hitch a free ride on everything! You completely omit the bitter-past-sweet pumpkin soup, don't you? So Xi still has to go back and ponder why the food I ate at the White House tasted so much like Jinggangshan? He is pondering many things, so when we talk about Xi, we actually need various pieces of news to help him understand what on earth he experienced in the U.S. this time, right? Otherwise, as we said, with so many 50-cent army trolls coming over these days, we keep tirelessly reminding the trolls and national security agents: since you're here, you better make sure to bring back the content of our analysis. Only when you bring it back can Chairman Xi understand what on earth he experienced and where he was, right? Otherwise, you trolls and security agents will be the very first ones sent to the guillotine as sacrifices, right?

So look, we've talked about how Xi's snake was supposed to turn into a dragon or something, but the dragon wasn't formed, and the white tiger didn't get any wings added either. But hey, we did see the bald eagle fly over, and Trump even specifically said in the official White House summary of this meeting with Xi that he hopes this eagle can have a very nice place to stay in the CCP's country. What does having a very nice place to stay mean? Isn't this the same as Trump currently keeping America's influence very secure and stable in Venezuela, right? And besides, there's something hilarious here too. Look, even Xinhua News Agency can't deny that Xi visited the National Archives, right? Ah, this was when examining the narrative earlier, Xi was even thanking the U.S. for such thoughtful arrangements, expressing his extreme satisfaction. Then walking up the stairs at the National Archives just to be subjected to the humiliation of Trump's stone steps, right? Look, as I said, when Xi looked at the National Archives, at least under the lens, his expression showed no dissatisfaction whatsoever! If you're going to say things like, "Oh, Xi didn't look at the cue cards, it seemed like Xi walked away in a huff, demonstrating the might of a major country," and so on—completely nonexistent. At least as we say, look at the footage from public reporters, because there were no close-ups; this entire segment, from both domestic and foreign media, used wide shots where Xi clearly walked over to look, chatted, and smiled. Later on, you'll even see Peng Liyuan leaning her head in close to look at that shot. By the way, let me make a correction: this white-haired expert should be the current Director of the National Archives, because Rubio's acting director served until around August, and this expert has now been approved by the Senate to serve as the director. But that's not important, right?

Also, let me tell you, we will show you more detailed footage later. Look, the three major bills—the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution—are placed in the display cases in the center of the hall that have stone inscriptions and stone nameplates. And look here, do you see these long display cases? I will show you the photos later. I went back and re-watched the entire footage of their itinerary, and there is definitely content in these exhibits; they are not empty. And these side ones, because they were actually walking in this direction when they left, you understand? So this is what I am telling you: the greatest possibility is that these contain the treaties of national humiliation we talked about. Because these are temporary display cases where exhibits can be changed at any time, while the three large ones in the middle are the original copies of the most important founding documents of the United States, which are kept there under constant temperature and humidity, you understand? We will explain this in detail later. Come, let's look at this. The CCP also cannot avoid the exhibition hall, right? Although the visit to the exhibition hall only lasted about 15 minutes from arrival to departure, 15 minutes is enough. Trump isn't going to give you a professional lecture, and he doesn't guarantee you will learn anything; he just makes his point and stops, you understand? The significance has already been established, look. Even the content edited by Xinhua News Agency couldn't avoid this. I tell you, this move—this trap that Xi is in now—he is completely unable to get out of it. Alright, we will supplement the details about the archives later. Come, let's first look at a detail from their meeting that we haven't told you about before, which is this.

Trump took Xi to see his Marine One presidential helicopter. I mentioned yesterday that he just took him to see it without letting him get on, and he didn't say he would take him to D.C., right? But besides seeing Marine One, because we don't know how they looked at it inside—there is no footage of that—the funniest part is the helipad on the South Lawn, which Trump had just renovated. Then Trump said to him, "Look, isn't mine nice?" And Trump had a particularly funny line here, he said.

Because Xi doesn't say anything to the reporters, Trump said to the reporters that he likes granite. Xi Jinping likes granite. In addition to many other fields, he is also an expert in stone materials and is very fond of high-quality granite. Hey, I want to ask our audience, have any of you ever heard of CCP propaganda writing that Xi likes stone materials, studies stone materials, and is especially fond of high-quality granite?

When I heard this, I felt something was wrong. I specifically checked, and I couldn't find any such propaganda. Then, looking back, why did Trump say this? Could it be that he just blurted it out and it meant nothing? Impossible! President Trump is a sharp person. Look at how he played Xi around during this visit; can't you see it? Ah! So how do we interpret this?

Think about it, what have we been saying on the show? Xi dug a biogas pit, and in fact, he is the stone in the latrine—stinky and hard, right? That is a stone. And what does the CCP often say? "Lifting a stone only to drop it on one's own feet." Our show often mentions this, and we even say "dropping it on the back of one's own head." We say he is, right? This is also related to stones. In addition, look, for example, the CCP, no matter what they do, they always say one thing: "We are crossing the river by feeling the stones."

Look at this remark by Trump again. He is clearly mocking Xi's "six thousand years of Chinese history" right to his face, and Xi is still smiling happily. Hey, he even gave us an extra thousand years; maybe I'll have to push back the Sanxingdui ruins to 4000 B.C. later because Trump acknowledged it, and Xi might still be foolishly happy. I tell you, think about Trump's remark: he is a stone expert, especially fond of high-quality granite, and he is an expert in this field in addition to many other areas. I ask you, in what field is Xi an expert? Is Xi an expert in reading Hugo's books?

Is Xi an expert in understanding Les Misérables? Or is Xi well-versed in the archives, very familiar with the Treaty of Wanghia, the Treaty of Tientsin, the letter from Guangxu to President Cleveland, and the Treaty of San Francisco? Ah? Or is it that Xi is very knowledgeable about history and knows which government is referred to when talking about the China that fought side-by-side with the U.S. during the War of Resistance?

It is crystal clear; everyone knows Xi is unlearned and incompetent. How did he become a stone expert? So it is very obvious. I think, based on the understanding of Xi shown during Trump's trip, this is definitely a slap in the face. After Xi arrived there, Trump said, "Look, isn't mine beautiful? Hey, this is high-quality granite." Xi must have told his translator, "Tell him I am very knowledgeable about this too. Not only does he know it, I know it too, and I also like high-quality granite very much. We have high-quality ones too."

Think about it, Xi is just talking about these things, these dry, empty pleasantries with no real substance, right? Plus, he wants to show off how much he knows, that China has a vast territory and abundant resources, so isn't Trump just mocking him? You know, you know, you know everything, you know the most in the whole world, does it feel like that? So it's hilarious, Trump didn't forget to mock Xi in everything he did. And then, another thing we have to mention, there is news today that everyone is sharing, what is it? It's that after Trump sent Xi away, he immediately called Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi today, and the US reports even said it directly.

Trump gave Sanae Takaichi a full briefing on his meeting with President Xi Jinping, and Sanae Takaichi also tweeted immediately after the call. Japan and the United States have now become each other's most trusted allies, and we have confirmed our determination to contribute to regional and world peace and stability together. In order to elevate our unwavering US-Japan alliance to a higher level, I will work closely with President Trump. Then the American reporters all commented that it has become a habit for Trump; every time he meets or talks with a Chinese leader, he calls Sanae Takaichi.

Yes, after the last Trump-Xi meeting in Beijing, didn't Trump also communicate with Sanae Takaichi immediately? He was afraid that if he was a step late, the CCP would sow discord in between! And this is to show the whole world, what are you sowing discord about? You can't sow discord! By the way, before I did the show today, I glanced at it, didn't Musk go to this state dinner? Sitting at the first table, right? Sitting at the first table, regardless of Musk, Jensen Huang, or Lisa Su, oh my, they are basically all exposed, they are the ones who need Xi the most, and are the most sycophantic to Xi. It would be strange if the US didn't target them as important national security targets.

And then look, Trump issued an executive order today, or passed a bill. In short, it's a reduction in subsidies or incentives for Tesla electric vehicles again. Look, what does that mean? Isn't this equivalent to, after meeting Xi, he immediately rushed to communicate with Sanae Takaichi, telling her not to be fooled by the CCP's cognitive warfare. Then he announced it to the world, who is close to whom, who is with whom? Is it just a concept on the surface? Musk paid real money to go to the state dinner, and then, he was just praising Xi as such a wise ruler and so sensible, and then immediately after this.

Trump gives you a bill, right? Cuts his benefits, so Trump plays it well. Hey, we have audience friends saying, is the top of the bunker granite? Hey, this is uncertain, what if that bunker in Iran is made of granite? Yes, because that granite underground bunker is absolutely solid, so indeed, our audience friend's point makes sense, it's very possible. That means you know too much about granite, don't I know? Ah, that bunker of yours, including the bunker you gave to Khamenei, they are all granite inside, this is well said.

Okay, and then look at Sanae Takaichi's side, right? Xi is still doing this and that to Japan, and Trump shows you the letter from the Guangxu Emperor after the First Sino-Japanese War, and then shows the good relationship between him and Sanae Takaichi, right? Look, they just met at the UN General Assembly on September 22, and immediately after Xi left, Trump called Sanae Takaichi. I guarantee he didn't just dryly tell her that he and Xi met well, very well, really well, that's impossible, right? Okay, and after watching this, let's talk about this.

This Chinese Embassy in the US, this also posted this tweet, because they can't get around the archives issue, you don't want to mention it, and you can't delete it, so, after thinking for a long time.

The Embassy in the US posted this, look, they put up a photo taken outside, and then said that after the visit, President Xi and Madame Peng Liyuan, accompanied by President Trump and his wife, visited the US National Archives, and then started saying that President Xi Jinping emphasized that China and the US are different in many aspects, with different history, culture, social systems, and development paths, but the Chinese people and the American people are the same, both yearning for a better life. As long as we acknowledge and respect each other's differences, understand each other, learn from each other, focus on the greatest common ground, lengthen the list of cooperation, and properly manage differences, the relationship between the two countries can achieve stable and long-term development, hey.

This is clearly something they pasted on, because Xi didn't have such a long speech under the camera in the archives, and after the visit, he wasn't given another chance to address the camera, so this belongs to the CCP's propaganda. But, we see this first, and I have something really funny to show you, which is.

He said it this way, and the content posted by the US House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party actually coincides with what Xie Feng and their embassy posted. And what's interesting is, I'll show you the time, the US House of Representatives posted this tweet at the time Xi visited on September 25, while China's was posted more than a day later.

Obviously, this is an act to save face, but I have to say, this guy Xie Feng is indeed much less capable than Qin Gang. Look at how Xie Feng and his people cooperated with the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs over here to arrange this Trump-Xi meeting for Xi; it's the most disastrous failure in history! I'm telling you, especially in the future after Communist China opens up and information control is further weakened, this whole affair will literally be turned into a comedy that can be filmed and re-filmed over and over again! And then, what, Xie Feng is just over here, right? Ah, thinking that he can just get by with sycophantic flattery.

Look, judging from his tweets, he doesn't put any heart into it. Why? If he just paid a little more attention like us, he would find out what the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party had to say. When Xi visited the National Archives, look right there, Committee Chairman John Moolenaar issued a statement saying that today Xi Jinping visited the National Archives Museum, which houses America's Declaration of Independence and Constitution. Below is what Committee Chairman Moolenaar hopes Xi Jinping can learn from this visit. Xi Jinping walked past the Declaration of Independence.

Congress said this: the Chairman stated that American values are life and liberty for all, while the values of Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party are tyranny, genocide, and oppression. Therefore, Moolenaar expressed hope that this visit would inspire Xi Jinping to end his cruel policies and allow the Chinese people to have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and a life of freedom and prosperity. He said Americans can be proud of our nation's founding principles because these principles are in every way superior to the authoritarian rule of Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party. And he also said this.

The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution have inspired freedom all over the world, see that? So you see, after reading this, and looking back just a day later.

That post published by Xie Feng and their embassy said that President Xi went to the Archives and emphasized that the people of China and the people of the United States both alike yearn for a better life. Ah, isn't this equivalent to stabbing the Xi-CCP in the back right alongside the United States? Right? Oh, the Xi-CCP really went to the Archives, and our embassy has already stamped and verified it. After going there, although President Xi didn't emphasize it at the time, the message officially passed down through us afterwards is that indeed.

After looking at the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and the US Constitution, President Xi emphasized that the Chinese people indeed, just like the American people, yearn for a better life, isn't that right? Ah, as for all those words you said before and after, those just belong to the category of diverging around this center. Damn it, we have to say, these brainless bootlickers under Xi—ever since Qin Gang, right, nobody knows where Xi threw him, there hasn't been anyone like Qin Gang back in Belarus who dragged local people out in the middle of the night to repeatedly measure with their footsteps.

How big would Xi Jinping's steps be as he walked through every step of the museum tour, how many seconds would he walk—tell me, does doing something like this count as a major political issue, a major mistake? Especially at a time when they are arresting spies nationwide, we really have to ask whether there is someone like Abbas Araghchi inside the Chinese Embassy in the United States, they really need to investigate, right? You say, if the embassy did things seriously, or if the Ministry of Foreign Affairs under Wang Yi did things seriously, would they let Xi clearly go to the Archives to be educated? To be targeted by the US and treated like being paraded through the streets for re-education? We say Maduro getting caught was electronic street-parading, but what happened to Xi is even scarier than electronic street-parading, it's.

Parading through the streets only shows that a person is a criminal, but Xi's case also tells you that he is uncultured! Later on, Trump will treat this sixth country buddy to keep Maduro company—an unelected illegal dictator, did you get that clear? And then you guys, whether it's the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the embassy, you have to nail things down for Xi every single second! You need to get the details of this itinerary exact. Why didn't anyone think to ask beforehand what music would be played during meals?

Ah, when Xi gets off the plane, will something suddenly flash across the top of his head? Ah, is there any taboo broken with the state gifts you're going to present? When you go to the Archives to study, what on earth are you studying? Then we have to say Communist China's baffling self-confidence; earlier they insisted on claiming, huh, that the National Archives that Xi is about to visit contains the US-China diplomatic establishment documents, the Three Joint Communiques, and so on and so forth.

How can they be so shameless? Just tell me! So we can see that when it comes to the media, it's not that the bigger they are, the more credible their words are, right? Dr. Yan from Lude Media says, the things we talk about get verified for everyone every day, while the stuff they talk about gets slapped in the face every day. And then Xinhua News Agency actually, I'm telling you, took some time not being able to compile the draft. Why is that?

By the time they arrived in the US, and after Xi had already finished his visit and the House Committee's draft was released, why did Xie Feng and his team take more than a day to publish theirs? Because they needed to get this draft out, confirm it could be written this way, and have every single word reviewed by superiors, so you know it's real.

Not only Xie Feng, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has problems, and that bunch at the Publicity Department is not working well either. This Xi, shouldn't he just break up the Central Military Commission like he did with other things? He should break all of these apart and scatter them completely. Anyway, it's you Xi personally directing it through your Xi Office, right? Look at these good-for-nothing bureaucrats just sitting in their positions doing nothing. Right now, public servants domestically can't even get their salaries paid, and handing out mooncakes for a holiday is now done all stingily, right? It is said that at some state-owned enterprises in past years, they would hand out boxes upon boxes of high-end mooncakes, plus several thousand yuan in shopping vouchers. They say that this year, some state-owned enterprises actually just handed out two mooncakes, and moreover.

Ah, they even went ahead and deducted the cost of these two mooncakes right out of your next month's payslip. Hey, so under this circumstance, you might as well just directly cut off these freeloaders and be done with it. Look at when Xi and Trump went before the archives back then to check the history—look at this Xinhua News Agency draft, it's a huge page-long thing, isn't it? Ah, including the fact that he was actually also in front of the archives, but he didn't mention much about the archives itself.

This is because overall they need to give you a feeling that Xi really stayed there very well, right? I told everyone yesterday, right inside this Red Hall, Xi told everyone publicly that he was extremely grateful for the highest standard of American hospitality, ah, being extremely meticulous and thoughtful, making him extremely satisfied, right? And furthermore, this matter of the archives, hey, look, walking into the central hall together, listening to the introduction of the archives and the main exhibits, isn't it?

This of course didn't dare to go into detail about what specific archives were viewed, and this is very interesting. Because look, as we repeatedly show everyone, including the embassy's posts and this Xinhua News Agency draft, they just can't cut this part out. You say if this were kept domestic, this matter would definitely drive the entire internet crazy! Who would dare to mention Xi making a fool of himself at the National Archives? Within a minute your account would be banned, your home raided, and you'd be taken for tea, right? He can even make the outside world think this thing never happened.

The crucial thing is that this happened in the United States, and reporters were all watching. You can't block this matter off, so they could only release a few photos of Xi looking somewhat human, right? Then actually, inside his heart, Xi already has this little notebook list all compiled, ah, so angry he was almost steaming from the seven apertures. Communist China still has to put on a brave face when beaten, do you guys say this isn't like what I talked about with Ah Q, who, after being beaten by Grandpa Zhao, still felt like, oh?

This beating is affection, this scolding is love, this doesn't count as anything. Hey, I must consider that he did this because he is, ah, this is my son, so a son beating his father is nothing. And because right now my face isn't rosy enough, after he beat me, my face is all flushed and not shriveled either, looking even fuller, isn't that a mentality? And look, ah, Communist China, I still took a look, and it's especially hilarious. Before this long-winded article from Xinhua News Agency and that long-winded article about the Bell and Tripod Hall came out, actually the draft that came out first only dared to mention one single sentence.

That is, local time, the morning of September 25, Xi Jinping and Peng Liyuan, accompanied by Trump and Melania, visited the U.S. National Archives. They didn't dare say much more, ah. We say, if this matter weren't so sensitive, would you go this far? So see, the front only dared to say one sentence first, and finally, after weighing it all and realizing this matter couldn't be bypassed, they added two more sentences and two more photos. Do you understand what this means? And look, they even specially made a dozen-or-so-seconds copywriting piece just for this one sentence, ah, truly so shameful. Good.

Then we say, ah, the crucial point is what on earth did Xi look at in the hall? Because right now, as we told you yesterday, the online materials at the time were still limited, right? When we talk to you about it today, I actually really looked over these materials over and over again a few more times. We previously indeed published the itinerary, that President Xi and President Trump had a closed-door session at the National Archives. And then, when it actually happened yesterday, what was it really like? It was inside the National Archives.

Look, ah, this video from Communist China is so hilarious. His shot inside flashes by for just a moment—look, did Xi see it? These two shots actually show that when Xi was inside, it was nothing like what they wanted to appear on the outside, for example, when trying to whitewash himself using Taiwan's media like the Liberty Times, which claimed: Oh, Xi yelled cut, or Xi was furious? There was nothing of the sort, look at this, ah.

Even though Communist China meticulously selected and could only cut out a few frames of Xi's itinerary in the lobby of the archives, here you can see Xi is still quite active, looking at Trump, responding to Trump, ah, and even pointing things out, very proactive, right? Ah, and then listening to others explain, did you see that? Ah, with this we can rest easy, understand? I am giving it to you now.

Come on, let's take a look. Several different versions came out this morning. The narrative we interpreted for everyone yesterday at the first opportunity is absolutely correct. This is information deliberately released by the U.S. to let it ferment on the internet regarding exactly what documents they prepared for Xi. And look at this matter, some, like the Liberty Times in Taiwan, directly stated that the documents displayed by the U.S. side, as reported by U.S. media, indeed included the Treaty of Wanghia, the Treaty of San Francisco, etc., just as we said, right? And then, in full view of everyone, they all saw Xi being educated in front of the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence.

Everyone is clear about this, and what is written here? Look, it says here, NBC and News Nation reporters were on the scene and said that multiple U.S.-China historical documents were also displayed on the display table in the central hall. You tell me, what historical documents were displayed? If they had displayed the U.S.-China Joint Communiqués, or China's successful Olympic bid, or a congratulatory letter written by the U.S., or China joining the WTO, or documents where the U.S. helped, there isn't one that Xi wouldn't have paused to watch, and then let the reporters take a close-up.

Why is it not mentioned what the documents are now? And look, it's very obvious, right? Multiple U.S. media sources who were on the scene reported that these documents were the Treaty of Wanghia, the Treaty of Tianjin, the letter from Cleveland, the Treaty of San Francisco, and the 'brick from the Great Wall'. You see, so it is all fermenting now. Even if Americans don't have much of a concept of the first few, they know that last year Mao Ning said China never accepted the Treaty of San Francisco, and that the disposal of Taiwan's sovereignty was illegal and invalid.

That is pure nonsense! Xi is now here in person to be educated. In this hall, do you understand now why the side display stand I showed you earlier, which was clearly a large display stand he walked past, is something that none of the CCP's propaganda dared to include in their footage? Ah, that's because it contained things he dared not look at. As for what you said about the Liberty Times, the Lude Media also said this morning that the so-called 'Xi Jinping calling for a halt' reported by the Liberty Times is just their own speculation. They also claimed it was an 'exclusive', but they don't have anyone on the scene, nor do they have any exclusive sources. It also says here, this.

Putting other things aside, look, the Washington media group revealed on one hand that the U.S.-China documents were placed on the side of that hall, including unequal treaties like the Treaty of Wanghia; on the other hand, they also said that the 'One China' documents that China wanted to see, such as the Shanghai Communiqué, the August 17 Communiqué, and the Joint Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations, were never even considered by the U.S.

Actually, the Liberty Times' meaning is that their understanding of the tweet we posted yesterday is different from others. They exclusively interpreted it as saying that this series of humiliating treaties were moved away, meaning Xi had them cut, so they weren't placed there. That's not the meaning. Their meaning is that they were no longer on display; these were moved from their original positions to here. Originally, these things might have been in the archives, and some people could even borrow them, but now, to make him look at them, they were moved out. But after they were moved out, you say.

What kind of conversation did Xi have with Trump regarding these few unequal treaties while he was there? Because on that day in the hall, during the whole process, reporters were only standing far away at the entrance of the hall filming; you couldn't hear what they were saying. Only the few words Trump specifically said to the reporters at the end—'Oh, I talked about the Iran issue,' 'Six thousand years versus two hundred and fifty years, I am more proud, we in the U.S. have two hundred and fifty years'—only these few sentences were recorded. Okay, the problem now is, we are quite serious, I must show everyone exactly.

Is it possible? It's not about whether it's possible; what exactly does that document cabinet next to the display look like? Come, let me find this reporter for you, because he released the entire process at the time. We took many screenshots from his footage. Okay, let's look frame by frame. Look, this is after walking in, right? The reporter is at the outermost part of this segment. Hmm, once you walk past, you will see the old curator leading the way in front, and then next to it is that series of circular, uh, curved display stands. See it? See it? Inside here, hey.

Do you see the color of this paper? I think based on this lighting, you can't judge whether it's white or yellow because it's too far away. Hey, I'm just saying everyone look carefully, comparing these few shots, there are these small square-style documents, right? There are larger documents that look like certificates. Hey, these, you say U.S. documents, whether they are treaties or signed papers, these are all standard paper sizes they use. But I'm just asking you, that long document.

Ah, have you seen it? Do Americans write things on paper this long? In reality, we can only look from afar, right? Let me show you again what is written on this kind of long paper. Actually, let me show you; I really think it looks like the letter from the Guangxu Emperor that I mentioned yesterday I would show you, but didn't open the webpage for. Because this letter from Guangxu itself isn't long, it was just written once in Manchu and once in Chinese. This letter is the one I mentioned, where he requested the United States to mediate between China and Japan after the First Sino-Japanese War.

So it is very likely placed right there, isn't it? Another possibility is that the U.S. has already specifically—for example, if the Treaty of Tianjin and the Treaty of Wanghia are placed here, then that letter might be specifically placed in the inner room, waiting for Xi to see it; all of this is possible. However, I have carefully watched the on-site reports, and it is like this: you see, when Xi walked past this cabinet, he deliberately didn't go over, and instead went to visit the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence, which are on these large stone tablets. Then, let's quickly go through it; there was conversation and interaction, and you see Xi even had a smiling expression, right?

Including what I told you, Peng Liyuan even leaned in to take a look, right? And after they finished looking, they walked all the way over, and after Trump answered a few questions from reporters on the other side, they left together. This is indeed, let me tell you, Xi probably didn't enter the small room. But first of all, these treaties of national humiliation were definitely prepared for him; otherwise, the U.S. side would never have released this content.

Under these circumstances, let's look at it. There are two possibilities regarding what it means that Xi did or did not go into the small room. We say this because there was a closed-door meeting scheduled beforehand, right? The schedule released by the White House included it. So, looking at it now, the funny thing is, this first shows that before going to the archives, Xi never expected the U.S. to give him such a humiliating "welcome" to look at.

And yesterday, Dr. Mo made a good point—was it Dr. Mo? He said there isn't a single thing in these treaties that has anything to do with the Chinese Communist Party. In the context of China-U.S. relations, it has absolutely nothing to do with your Communist Party, right? Without you, we would still be doing just fine, right? Don't think you're such a big deal. And look, let's look at the timeline now.

After the tea talk at the Red Room, they took a car to the archives. During the tea talk at the Red Room, Xi Jinping said in front of all the reporters: "It's so thoughtful, ah, thank you so much, I am satisfied; this is the highest level of treatment." If Xi Jinping knew about these humiliating treaties at that time,

and he still said that, wouldn't that be equivalent to kneeling? Ah, okay, if he knew and still said that, it just shows he is very cowardly, right? The possibility is that he is cowardly, and he must show that he is being treated well in the U.S. Even though he knew he was going to be humiliated, and even though he didn't dare to go over and look, he still had to put on a brave face, right? If this is the case, there is no way to whitewash him.

Ah, and if under those circumstances—let's go through the possibilities one by one—he already knew he was going to see the humiliating treaties, yet he still went against his conscience and praised the U.S., right? Then you could say that the patriotic education in the CCP's China has gone down the drain. Xi himself is not being patriotic here, right? Others get fined for changing a lyric in a song, yet when Xi is humiliating the nation, he still thanks them for the thoughtful arrangements and expresses satisfaction. He is the one leading the way in being unpatriotic, isn't he? Well, if he already knew, why did he keep smiling throughout the time in the archives?

This also lets everyone see how cowardly he is. If you didn't want to go, you shouldn't have gone at all. Ah, why is it that when the U.S. gives you a lesson on the Constitution, a lesson on rights, and a lesson on the values of independence and freedom, you go? But when it comes to the history of national humiliation that everyone knows, you refuse to look? Think about it, if this is the case, following the logic of, say, the Liberty Times, saying that Xi called for a "cut" doesn't reflect Xi's decisiveness, nor does it reflect him upholding his image as a great power in front of the U.S. It only shows that Xi is very cowardly, being led by the scruff of his neck, and finally saying, "Ah, let's negotiate. I won't look at those documents, don't embarrass me. I've already self-studied that lesson at home; let's just go learn about your three major American bills."

This is really, let me tell you, so embarrassing. You can't blame Xinhua News Agency or the embassy; they can't even cover this up. Well, then you say, if Xi didn't know, then when he was in the Red Room and said he was satisfied and that it was thoughtful, it means he had no concept of the B-1 bomber, the "Les Misérables" reference, the bald eagle catching the snake, or the granite issue, right?

Well, at that time we said, hey, this guy's brain really reacts slowly, expressing this satisfaction, or saying he reacted, but he is still a coward, right? Anyway, how to put it, it's either stupid, or it's cowardly, or it's both stupid and cowardly. Alright, so if he didn't know, and on the way, for example, when the car was driving there, someone told him that after you go there, you have to be shown the Treaty of Wanghia, the Treaty of San Francisco, etc., and then said if you are brainwashed, then we have to look at this possibility, right?

Then look, did the US prepare it for you? Is the purpose really to make sure you thoroughly learn this lesson? Not really, they just want you to know it, right? Then how is this knowing reflected? As long as you arrive at this archives, you can't say you don't know, and even if you don't go to the archives you can't explain this matter clearly, because not going also indicates that you might know, but you don't want to go, right? If you go, what do you say? If you go and don't look, haven't you already known?

That is to say, no matter what Xi thinks, Xi now knows that the lesson arranged by the US for him to learn about the unequal treaties that humiliate the nation and forfeit sovereignty is clear in his mind. Then the problem is, with this awareness in mind, when you arrive at this archives, right? You still act like this, smiling, looking naive, hey, interacting with Trump, asking questions, and nodding frequently.

Now this is very interesting. So your meaning is to admit, right? That set of unequal treaties, I don't need you Americans to explain it to me a second time. My current main focus is targeted make-up lessons; I mainly want to make-up on your Bill of Rights here, this three, these three major things, including the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, because I didn't study these clearly when I was in China, so I have to come and see for myself, to come and study them.

Look, isn't this walking right into the line of fire? That is to say, what the House of Representatives said is, what we want is for you to come and see it and then go back, and then you can no longer say that your dictatorship over the people is excusable, right? You have all studied it, right? You know there is a part of you concerning Chinese history, and you insist you don't need extra study. Since you came here on purpose, you go straight to those three major bills. You have to show results after you finish studying, otherwise, aren't you just a stubborn, stupid and bad piece of rock in an outhouse? Indeed a stone expert. And you have to know, what is most likely? It is Xi.

He didn't skip past this at all. Just think, if this exhibition booth, as we just showed everyone, has already been set up next to it, that thing can be removed within two minutes, and then making it look like it's not an empty exhibition booth, is that so? Then it must be, either removed, then it's an empty side one, and you look and see only the table cloth is there, this red back cloth, right? Everyone has been to a museum, when there are no exhibits, nothing will be placed there for you, and at a glance it's something with small labels and everything, and then it's a temporarily arranged cabinet.

Right? The US didn't say these few, to put a few pages here, or how? So he doesn't have much time to make changes here for you! Then the question comes, where did you, Xi, shout cut? Oh, you walked in, and it was right by your hand. Even if you didn't walk over to look at it closely, when Trump was talking to you, when the curator was introducing it, when you were whispering, didn't I say it? The reporters didn't capture these sounds, hey.

Guess what, would Trump say in his ear: "If you are willing, let's go take a look next door, those are your Treaty of Wanghia, Treaty of Tianjin, Treaty of San Francisco, and that letter." Xi could only smile and say: "Thank you, I don't need to go over and look anymore, right?" He wouldn't even dare to utter a single swear word, do you believe it? Hey, and under this circumstance, coming out and saying: "You Xi, oh, shouted cut, didn't look, ended the exhibition early."

Isn't this talking nonsense with eyes wide open? So we just say, even if that closed-door didn't happen, right? Maybe Xi there, right before it, had his people pass word that I'm not going to that closed-door one. Let me tell you, it doesn't affect the arrangements made for you by the US at all. Because why? This morning the Louder Society also told everyone, I want to supplement my different, not saying different, just supplementary perspective.

Because his focus is, Xi is now, right? Your own official media all admitted it, the photos were released, in plain view he went to the National Archives, and the US side specially released news, detailing the evidence narrative chain of those unequal treaties preparing for you Xi by the US, this has already achieved the purpose. Therefore, from this moment on, whether Xi admits it or not, the fact that he saw this matter has become a reality. Because look, you don't need to say much, right? The US gives you a lesson, you don't look, no matter which link it is, you discover it and don't look, you first have to know what it is in order not to look at it, right? Then this topic is told to you.

This is already equivalent to the message being delivered, because the US doesn't care at all whether you, Xi Jinping, want to come over later to look at the originals, hey, playing with it in your hand, and then Trump still has to waste breath, talking about this thing there, do you recognize it? What's written on this is Chinese, like that letter from Emperor Guangxu, right? That original was still in Manchu and Chinese, it wasn't even English, it wasn't even English, and for Trump to explain it would be a bit more tiring, right?

I'm telling you, the United States is just like, as long as I select these documents for you in this order! I said, of the letters from the Qing dynasty emperors, there are thirteen in the National Archives, and they just specially selected this one. With so many treaties, like the Treaty of 1901, the US is also in it, why don't they release that one? Right? Not to mention those subsequent communiqués and stuff. This is a specially selected narrative chain, made exclusively for you to see, Xi.

So yesterday we explained it to everyone, right? What meaning did this whole circle express? Our audience and friends all understand now, right? What the hell are you, the Chinese Communist Party? The US doesn't give a damn about you, and Taiwan has not a damn thing to do with you! Don't you dare come here to change this narrative. Hey, even if you fight Japan, think about your pathetic initial facts of the First Sino-Japanese War, and then come rant in front of me. Look, once the US narrative chain comes out, it has already accomplished what it wanted to inform, which is that from that very moment, Xi.

Regardless of whether he walked past, looked closely, or heard it—yes, our audience friends used the right term, it's called informed notification, and that's OK. Hey, if you say you aren't going to look, and you want to leave early, Trump would be more than happy—Trump's dry remarks wouldn't even be left to say to you, haven't you noticed yet? Just hurry up and send him off and be done with it, right? Look, this morning Lu De Media used this matter of serving a subpoena to make a comparison for everyone. Yes, once you are served a subpoena, this is you being explicitly notified of this notice.

Ah, the person delivering the subpoena has a camera on their chest. The record of notice has already been recorded for you, with your own signature, and there will be this evidence when the time comes, right? Actual notice. Why was it that back then when Liang Guanjun couldn't find me and forged my signature, every lawsuit I filed hit the mark? A counterattack immediately knocked him out of returning to America, right? And he even had to quickly register himself as a big agent of the CCP's country, and hurriedly dissolve it, so-called dissolving the New York Chinese General Chamber of Commerce and those things under his command with tens of thousands of people, right?

It's just because this kind of thinging is too easy to forge and be told apart. Liang Guanjun put himself right into this felony back then, so he was scared like this and hurriedly returned to the country to hide. Xi's subpoena is equivalent to now, as long as he.

Look, whether you follow the US media reports saying Xi looked, or you follow the Liberty Times reports saying Xi called cut, in short, it's equivalent to everyone saying the subpoena was served, except one is equivalent to Xi accepting the subpoena, and the other is equivalent to Xi dodging. You've run right to my doorstep, right? I saw you, and you saw me, and I quickly ran away. Hey, running away like this, I tell you, doesn't count, because people have recorded you, so this is evidence. Even if you don't sign, people still prove delivery, understand? And there's another point, like what we talked about for everyone previously.

This is just like the SEC settlement, right? Whether the SEC settles with Guo Wengui or Sun Yuchen, these settlements prove that you already know what you are currently doing, and US laws do not allow it; you have to reach a settlement through fines. But next time if this matter escalates to criminal charges, then when we prosecute you, you can't say, 'Oh, I didn't know about it originally,' 'Oh, I didn't know this couldn't be done,' right? We have repeatedly talked about this concept in our programs. Look, why else would I say—I think the state security and national security police are picking and choosing to summarize our content, this content that our audience and friends are all familiar with, if Xi knew about it.

He wouldn't even need to, he could just go and look at it openly, because his so-called cover-up narrative of whether it contained a cut or not is completely unnecessary, because it doesn't hold water, right? He has already been informed and notified. Hey, so now Xi doesn't admit he looked, and then including Xinhua News Agency and others, after some trimming and dressing up of the archives matter for him, it's as if it was a very successful visit. It has that same vibe as when we said the soft-ribbed Princess Xi was taken to task by Trump, hey, as soon as we exposed it, the CCP country immediately had to take a detour, and couldn't even use its own media to talk about it, right? The archives matter, with its treaties humiliating the country and forfeiting sovereignty, was inconvenient to discuss in China's internal media.

The princess matter was also inconvenient to discuss in the CCP country's own media, so look, this time I don't know why Liberty Times understood it this way! I don't know if someone deliberately misled the reporters of Liberty Times, using this method to forcefully whitewash Xi? Then, just like that time with the princess, wasn't that detouring to the Belarusian deputy prime minister or vice president's place? And then telling reporters that the princess was not in some other place that time, she was personally sent over by Chairman Xi and his wife in the dead of night inside Zhongnanhai, right? Making her first diplomatic debut to wine and dine Lukashenko, and wining and dining him like a family banquet, that—that was spoken as if he had met his son-in-law, right? To smear the princess like this, simply outrageous! I said, if the princess knew about us...

The matter discussed in the program suggests that you should also get rid of those sycophants around you, right? It's not enough to just smear the princess. Do you see if the tactics are similar? Taking a detour, trying to use others' mouths to whitewash yourself, only to end up making it even darker. Look, the U.S. is actually laying out these archives to create a chain of evidence for a narrative. What I'm telling you is that we have historical basis for this.

We have the original narrative framework of all the treaties. Whether you agree or not is up to you, but our narrative is not nonsense, and you must acknowledge it. You are aware of this U.S. narrative chain, right? Xi cannot say 'I don't know.' If you don't know, why don't you read? Right? These are the things Xi must acknowledge in the future. Of course, lying through one's teeth is another matter. Fine, there's no need for you to read them, no need for you to display them in front of reporters, just like the way Xi shows off his reading.

Like reciting a book list, saying 'I've read Alexandre Dumas, the younger Dumas, Hugo,' how I've read 'The Three Musketeers,' 'Les Misérables,' and 'The Hunchback of Notre-Dame.' You don't need to recite a book list; you don't need to come here and say in front of reporters, 'I have read the Treaty of Wanghia, the Treaty of San Francisco.' The point is that during your visit to the U.S., our American stance, as well as our original archives—using the National Archives as a symbol—have already been presented to the whole world. And we have provided the originals here; you cannot say they don't exist, you cannot say you don't acknowledge them, right? You say, 'We, the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party, didn't go to sign the Treaty of San Francisco.' The U.S. says, 'You didn't sign, but everyone else went!'

Did you sign the Treaty of Wanghia? Did you sign the Treaty of Nanking? Did you sign the Boxer Protocol? You didn't sign, and it's not like you were the leader; you had the right not to sign, but they simply didn't include you in the game. To put it bluntly, our audience can also say, 'Why is the executive order signed by Trump valid? I live in the U.S., and I didn't go to witness it, right?' Our audience can still say that. 'Why does the U.S. sign the Abraham Accords now, letting Israel and other countries sign them? I can't refuse to recognize that. But I wasn't there to witness it either, right?' This stuff, you say it has anything to do with you? You weren't there, you couldn't reach it, who are you blaming? You weren't even born yet, so whose fault is it? Right?

Using the language the CCP loves to use, isn't it a question of who has a longer history? You always say the U.S. is only two hundred-plus years old. Trump says we are only 250 years old, but we are proud of it. Does the Chinese Communist Party really dare to be proud? Then tell me, if the last 6,000 years have all been under the CCP, then tell me first: did you, the CCP, acknowledge and sign those humiliating treaties? Otherwise, how do you explain this? So, it cannot be explained. I'm telling you, right? And here, what the U.S. wants is to convey a clear historical narrative through this archival narrative! You...

In the future, the CCP can, of course, still say, 'Oh, we don't buy it, we don't accept this, it has no historical basis! It appeared suddenly! How so?' But the U.S. knows, just like Xi acknowledged here that he wouldn't support Iran or Russia, but then turned around and supported them anyway—isn't that just your sophistry? Before Maduro was caught, he could still argue with his neck stiff. But after he was caught, it was different. At the end of June, at the MDC, he was smiling and taking pictures in his Nike clothes, right? Hey, Xi is the same. Wait until that day when the military parade reaches your bedroom.

Come on, it won't be many months before you'll also have to smile and take pictures in that detention center, right? So look, the U.S. is telling you that coming to the National Archives is equivalent to sending you a signal. This is not your propaganda department where you can arbitrarily tamper with manuscripts. These are our originals, treaties, and diplomatic records; they are evidence recognized by our laws. And you have already been brought in front of them yourself. As for you saying, 'I have already learned this lesson, I don't need to listen to the lecture again,' the U.S. means it doesn't matter, right? Anyway, whether you have truly learned it or not by then, that's your business. The U.S. has fulfilled its responsibilities and obligations.

One more point, we often talk about judicial cases, don't we? In judicial cases, including the Guo Wengui recall case, it's not like all the evidence regarding Guo Wengui has to be listed for you, right? Including when he talks about these drug lords, the Sinaloa cartel, he doesn't have to list every single detail for you. The main thing is how the prosecution explains the matter clearly and includes the most necessary evidence in the indictment. They can even add new evidence while the trial is ongoing, catching the defendant off guard, right? Or there are some disclosures that cannot be shown to the opposing lawyer, like those related to national security, right? At most, they can only be reviewed in a closed court. There are many different ways to play this game.

At this point, let's just say the CCP really doesn't have this concept. What do we have in the PRC? Oh, an indictment has to be written so rigorously? How do you choose evidence? They only learned the superficial aspects, because in the PRC, this stuff doesn't really matter much; it mainly depends on whether the government wants to get you, right? There's no such thing as sending a subpoena first; if you don't send a subpoena, you can't find the person. Like Guo Wengui and Liang Guanjun, if they want to find me, they can't, right? But in the PRC, that's different. Where are you? Don't I know? Even if it's cross-provincial, I'll just have you arrested first. Once you're arrested, do you admit it or not? Right? I guarantee you'll admit it. So, they just don't have this concept.

But the U.S. is a country that practices the rule of law, so Trump's point is, look, this is like the chain of evidence in an indictment. We're saying, if you go to mess with Taiwan later, regardless of whether you can take it or not, the moment you move those claws, I can unseal this indictment. I'll take the initiative to strike first, right? You think you're poised to act? Oh, this hand is reaching out to subvert Taiwan. The U.S. side, right? Whether it's military force, precision strikes, or some other innovative way to 'open up' that we haven't thought of.

While the U.S. is doing this, it can unseal the indictment. And what is that indictment? Isn't it equivalent to me telling you: First, you are illegal and unelected; you are a dictator. Second, you want to take Taiwan; we have warned you repeatedly, and Trump even showed you the original documents, specifically arranging for you to study them so that you deeply realize in your heart that Taiwan does not belong to the CCP, and you have no reason to take Taiwan, right? And now you still won't listen, so because of this, we must arrest you. What you're doing is illegal. I'm just simplifying this. Think about it, does that make sense?

Then, when it's unsealed, look at our evidence, right? We have this dating back to the Treaty of Wanghia, and there's physical evidence, like that brick from the Great Wall. The CCP always says this land has been theirs for thousands, six thousand years. Well, for that brick, a lawyer could ask you: 'Tell me, when this brick was fired, where were the PRC and the CCP?' Right? Unless you say, 'Oh, this is a fake, we fired it after we founded the country,' right? Otherwise, you're caught; this piece of evidence shows the CCP is lying, right? So, I'm telling you, there's a lot of room to play with this later. So the U.S. is now, look at the logic in the judiciary, first determine the narrative; this is the U.S. judicial mindset.

You have to first pick out the facts that best illustrate the elements of the crime and the overall pattern. You have to fix this framework—what is this case, what is it about? Then what's the second step? The second step is 'notice,' formally notifying the defendant by serving a subpoena, and at the same time, they receive the indictment. Or if you say you won't accept it and refuse to receive it, and you're caught on camera intentionally refusing, well, you can't blame the U.S. government for that, right? When you're eventually arrested and brought to court, you won't be able to argue that you didn't know why you were being charged. That's not possible, see? The narrative and notice have both been achieved. And here you might say, 'The bad things the CCP has done are too numerous to record, does it only reflect these few documents?' Far from it. This is the third step of the judicial logic we just talked about: writing the indictment. Evidence can fill a warehouse; you just select the most important ones, right? And you can add more when necessary.

In short, if you investigate and find additional crimes, you can add them; you can even file a superseding indictment, understand? And you say, 'Well, we all know these things.' It feels like, 'Oh, Xi says it's fine, I don't think these things are enough to get me arrested.' You're missing one point: the prosecution has a lot of things that cannot be made public due to national security, right? Otherwise, why would Guo Wengui, or Guan Weidong—that Guan Weidong from The Epoch Times who just pleaded guilty—have to spend a lot of money to find lawyers to go through the step of getting explanations from the prosecution? We've talked about this before, including in our member programs, which is wanting to know, 'Oh, what else do you know about me regarding national security?' The U.S. says, 'I won't tell you.' Right? It's like Xi saying, 'So what? What can you do with just this evidence?' The U.S. says, 'But I know how you discussed taking Taiwan in private, how you discussed helping Iran, how you discussed releasing the virus, and how you discussed nuclear proliferation,' not to mention all the other miscellaneous things. See? But for national security, I'm not telling you now, understand?

So you see here, as a prosecutor nurtured and trained by the American judicial system, this is basic logic for you, just like the logical chain of a doctor treating a patient. Here, you could say, now that Trump has completed Xi's notice with your subsequent details—what specific evidence is ultimately listed? Ah, whether certain materials are made public and if there are others? This is no longer related to your Xi; this is America's own affair, which they can complete simultaneously. See it clearly now? There are only two steps here related to the defendant: one is the notice, and the other is the narrative. Both are now completely fulfilled in the archives. What do you think Trump meant by productive? Isn't he productive? Ah?

So this is what we call the essence of American jurisprudence, right? Ah, then look, hey, let's show everyone again, ah. I mentioned that the US ambassador directly tweeted—no, wait, not tweeted, the ambassador said this in an exclusive interview with CNBC on September 25. Then Nuomituan translated it, and our screen here seems to have frozen a little bit again. Let me read it to you first, ah; our Lude Media has the original text. In the excerpt from Ambassador Pendew's exclusive interview with CNBC on September 25, there is a paragraph stating that the United States is by no means a declining superpower, and the so-called Thucydides Trap touted by Xi Jinping is purely a false proposition. Look, in the program we just talked about, which was mentioned the day before yesterday, I said that Thucydides Trap that Xi is always talking about is a false proposition, something licked up by that Harvard professor who sucks up to the CCP, right? And Xi keeps talking about it everywhere.

Isn't this—isn't this Pendew's original words? Ah, specifically stating that President Trump's performance was impeccable. I believe we have proven to the Chinese side, ah, that we in the United States are not a declining superpower. The so-called Thucydides Trap is purely a false proposition. I am deeply honored to serve as President Trump's representative to the United States. See this section? Ah, why is it that whatever we finish saying always ends up appearing in official US records very shortly afterward? We truly find it very interesting, ah! We don't know why it's such a coincidence.

Then look, Pendew is also afraid that you in the CCP will go back, right? Racking your brains to build momentum here, so Pendew said that no matter how the CCP changes its phrasing, US policy toward Taiwan will not change in any way! Right at the critical moment when you go to visit the archives, this matter must be stated, right? Because everyone, look, bipartisan lawmakers also repeatedly emphasized arms sales and protection for Taiwan around the time of Xi's visit to the US, right? Hey, making sure President Trump definitely does not soften his stance.

And then President Trump makes you, Xi, feel as if everyone else is being so tough on you, and only I, Trump, am good to you—I'm really holding back, really recognizing you. Hey, before Xi's smile could even fade, Pendew immediately steps in right here, right? As Mr. Yeh Wan-hui also mentioned, and others mentioned too, but Pendew is the US Ambassador to China, right? When an official representative says it, it's different. Isn't this just making it clear: Trump smiles and says I'm good friends with you, and Pendew says, ah, the relations are so good, it's especially convenient to trick him into the back kitchen and make soup out of him—isn't that the exact feeling? Look.

President Trump has repeatedly clarified his stance, reiterating last year, keeping it consistent from his first term to now, that our Taiwan policy has not changed at all, strictly adhering to the One China policy, firmly fulfilling the Taiwan Relations Act, the Three Joint Communiques, and the Six Assurances without any wavering. China has constantly tried to force changes, but we will not change our wording, nor will we change our stance, ah! We seek peace in the Taiwan Strait, oppose coercive actions, and do not support Taiwan independence. And even more interestingly, he said we believe President Xi Jinping has received this signal; President Trump has shown respect and also listened to the Chinese side's stance. We are now more stable than at any time in the past decade.

Did you see that, ah! Look, what does it mean to receive this signal? The archives are the signal, understand? How respectful President Trump is to you—he didn't shout and scream in your face, right? That's too low-class; instead, he smiles while making you, Xi, so furious on the inside that you're about to explode, yet on the outside you must pretend to be very willing to listen to President Trump and the archivist explain things to you. I'm telling you, during the explanation process, he could directly tell you, look, this is the Constitution, right? Ah, I hear your CCP country doesn't have one yet, but we have it here, and we hope your people can have it too. These words are slipped right in within minutes. Hearing this, Xi can only smile.

Hey, and still show that, oh, thank you, well explained, very satisfied, right? The stance was listened to, didn't Xinhua say that Xi started out by pointing out, ah, that the Taiwan issue is China's internal affair and so on? Trump says internal affair my foot, we have prepared the original sources of our narrative chain right here for you to come and see for yourself whether it is your internal affair, right? Just this whole series, this is a secret war, ah.

The funniest thing is, let me tell you, this whole business with Hu Xijin is just hilarious. Back on September 23, right when Xi just arrived in the United States, oh boy, Hu immediately started spinning things—distance-flattering from afar—saying what? What was he saying? Oh, Taiwan dropped a bombshell, claiming that Lai Ching-te is going to make the National Palace Museum in Taipei serve as a funeral sacrifice in a war, and claiming there are also things like the New Taipei Banqiao National Children's Future Museum and the underground floors of five-star hotels, supposedly leaked as a classified briefing on a Taiwanese forum, saying this is.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers suggested turning them into backup sites for underground wartime command centers, meaning how could you possibly do this? Ah, this funeral sacrifice thing, how could it be? Look at how he handles this matter.

What did he say? Kuomintang politicians demanded explanations and submitted interpellations, and then he claimed that Taiwan's situation is on its last legs, and its demise is only a matter of time. Like a grasshopper after frost, it can't jump around for much longer, and then they're going to make the Palace Museum and the Children's Museum serve as funeral sacrifices? How about that? Look, he says, now your Taiwan means you don't get it—Trump and Xi Jinping, his point is that Trump and Xi are on such good terms now, do you guys in Taiwan still think you have a backer? Right? That was his underlying message everywhere, even saying, oh, Japan, meaning the right-wing government there is very anxious, but you're all bluff and no bite, the Chinese Communist Party's country is now irreplaceable, and so on and so forth. I'm thinking.

It goes on for a long time, let me tell you. The repeated message is: look, look how Xi has gone to the US now, right? Ah, look how much respect Trump shows Xi, right? Xi is going to tell you guys, listen up all you people in the world, Taiwan will sooner or later be a cake for the Chinese Communist Party! Binding Japan and Taiwan together won't work, your Kuomintang are already our people, right? You coordinate well with us, you have no secrets in Taiwan. First of all, let's talk about the classified briefing being leaked. Have you ever thought about whether this might be a trap? Doesn't the U.S. know how deeply infiltrated the Taiwan government is? Now just look at Trump playing with Xi in this historical allusion; some of them are so deep that even we overseas Chinese have to go research it.

Only then do you understand the allusion, like that letter from Emperor Guangxu, right? Before that, not many of us would think of this point unless you specifically study history. It's understood so deeply to this extent, and why would he let such a major event—one that can clearly be used to shape public opinion—be leaked out like this? Have you ever thought that this was on purpose? Whoever gets this, whoever supports this, is the person of the Chinese Communist Party, right? Hu Xijin should think about that first. He's still out there hyping things up, while over there another wave of the Frozen Churn Army dropped.

And let's say this again: look, right when Xi arrived here, Hu Xijin was cooperating and praising him to the skies. Now, after several days of Xi's trip, I refuse to believe that you, Hu Xijin, don't understand what's going on by now. Hu Xijin definitely watches our show; just look at his responses and you'll know, right? Sometimes he even specifically doesn't name names, but on Twitter before, he still wanted to deny what Master Lei told us, right? Hu Xijin.

He listened to the show, so you tell me, is Hu Xijin really stupid and doesn't understand? Ah, he definitely understands, so right now he's purely cowardly, vicious, and just wants to save his own skin. Why? Because his flattery hit the horse's leg—no, it didn't just hit the horse's leg, it practically hit the horse's hemorrhoids, basically that concept, right? Once the horse feels the pain, it's bound to buck. When the horse feels the pain, it wasn't bleeding before, but now it's bleeding, and on top of that, who knows, maybe it even gets diarrhea, right? Then with a kick of its hooves, Hu Xijin is about to get kicked away right before our eyes. So, the funny thing is right here.

At the very same time Xi was making his return trip, Hu Xijin suddenly posted another long essay, and this is where it gets funny. What did he talk about? He talked about how spies are all around us and we must learn to identify them. But old Hu, oh my, has never been corrupted once, oh!

You shouldn't be continuing to flatter at a time like this! Saying how rich Xi's trip to the US was, how much it reflected the style of a major power, or shouting slogans at Taiwan to prove that after Xi's visit, you Taiwan and Japan should be even more cowardly. Hey, you could also shout slogans at Sanae Takaichi, right? Saying look, our Xi has visited, the U.S. doesn't give Sanae Takaichi such high-level treatment, but gives Xi such high-level treatment. Hu Xijin uses his glib tongue to package it all up for you, right? And then makes Sanae Takaichi lose sleep over it.

Instead, against the backdrop of Chairman Xi being so satisfied with this trip, Hu Xijin suddenly started posting a long tweet saying: Oh, this TV drama confrontation makes people see how realistically spies infiltrate daily life scenes. Sensitive industries, people with access to important secrets, and leading cadres should all maintain counter-espionage awareness as a basic skill. To show that he takes the lead both in caring for the country and the party, and can serve as a role model.

Ah, he said that in Old Hu's decades-long career, he has repeatedly encountered external spies and never let himself fall into dangerous situations. Graduating from a military academy and understanding intelligence studies—is this the second time for Hu Xijin? At least the second time! The last time was when he met with Fangfang, when he also claimed to be a military intelligence person. Look, Hu Xijin, a military academy graduate who studied intelligence—isn't he just a military special agent? Ah!

Look, Hu Xijin is trying to show his loyalty now, especially since Xi's entire trip to the United States was a complete disaster from start to finish; he will definitely be looking for someone to hold accountable when he gets back. Let me tell you, with Xi in his current state, if he doesn't find a few people to make an example of when he returns to establish his authority, he won't even be able to enjoy his instant noodles at night. That is why Hu Xijin is acting now.

He definitely listened to our program immediately and started to shift his stance, right? If Xi wants to hold people accountable upon his return—specifically those who colluded with outsiders to make him look foolish—Hu Xijin is the first to jump out and distance himself. "Don't come looking for me, because I, Hu Xijin, have spent decades as a military intelligence operative and know how dangerous this is."

Of course, let's just say, none of those people who were killed during the Cultural Revolution were any more sincere than you, Hu Xijin, are expressing right now. Especially since many of them were truly innocent, right? But did that stop them from being persecuted to death during the Cultural Revolution? Were there no unjust, false, or wrong cases during Stalin's Great Purge? How come those people weren't as good at discerning things as you, Hu Xijin? You see, everyone is keeping an eye on your content, Hu Xijin. Even though these are just Weibo posts, given your credentials as a top-tier mouthpiece for military intelligence who graduated from a military academy, the United States is definitely monitoring your movements as well.

Look, you provided the U.S. with leverage. By blowing things out of proportion during Xi's visit to the U.S., you highlighted Xi's stupidity, right? You highlighted the incompetence of you people within the CCP, sending Xi to the U.S. to be humiliated while you were here cheering. And now you are trying to distance yourself? It's not that easy! Aren't you essentially telling the Americans, "Oh, as for the others here, with my decades of military intelligence experience, I know many of them are indeed easily infiltrated and bought off by you, so..."

I'm telling you, I am publicly warning everyone now, but what does this warning amount to? I am actually signaling to the U.S., "Hurry up and come over! There aren't many people here who can truly withstand your infiltration." Is that what he means? Old Hu says his public experience includes joining the army, learning foreign languages, and working as a journalist, and that he has been exposed to many secrets during his career and has become a target of interest for overseas spies.

If you are truly a party operative, shouldn't you be keeping the party's secrets for your entire life? What do you mean by this? It feels like Hu Xijin's meeting with Fang Fang was already obvious enough, and now he is emphasizing once again that "I, Hu Xijin, have public experience," which implies that I also have non-public experience—underground party experience. "I graduated from a military academy, I understand intelligence studies, and I know state secrets from my public experience. Overseas spies are interested in me, so internally I must say that I know they want to infiltrate me, but I don't buy it; I uphold my bottom line, etc., and will never fall for it." But, let's just say, do you uphold your bottom line when you are acting in private?

Look, he says, "I sometimes suspect, and sometimes clearly perceive, that they are trying to turn me." Then what about the times you didn't perceive it or suspect it, Hu Xijin? He mentions people wanting to provide frontline news, unrelated to China, offering high fees, or requesting articles during his graduate studies, etc. He says he knows these are early steps of subversion. Well, I ask you, the very forms of enemy subversion that your CCP China talks about are not that simple. Can you, Hu Xijin, really claim that you have mastered the Art of War and understand all of the U.S. counter-intelligence methods, and that you simply won't fall for it? Can you really do that?

If you are so great, why do you still need to continue participating in political study sessions? Shouldn't you be sitting there every day like Chairman Xi, telling everyone what to do, and establishing yourself as the one and only authority? So look, I ask you, Old Hu, who in the whole country knows more about these spies and their various forms and strategies than Chairman Xi? Chairman Xi's IQ is the highest among you all, do you admit it? If you admit it, then you are not as good as Chairman Xi. And are there people around Chairman Xi who are leaking information like us? You can't compare to Chairman Xi, and you haven't identified who around Chairman Xi is problematic, so how can you claim that you can identify everyone who comes to subvert you?

So you see, this is just Hu Xijin's public sophistry, understand? You don't need to look at the long-winded nonsense he wrote afterward. You know that Hu Xijin now has that "eating one bowl of jelly or two" kind of defensive desperation. After writing so much, I just want to ask you, Hu Xijin, on what grounds do you claim you haven't been subverted? The more I look at it, the more it seems you, Hu Xijin, are telling the whole world:

"I, Hu Xijin, am from military intelligence. I know secrets from my public work, and I have access to more in private. And before, they didn't succeed in subverting me, that's because the CCP wasn't as weak as it is now. Now it's like the end of the Qing Dynasty, and it's about to be 'opened up.' You guys better hurry up and come find me!" Is that the vibe I'm getting? I don't know if this Old Hu is just like those around Chairman Xi who arrange his itinerary and write his speeches—just jumping around.

It has reached a point where it is impossible to explain! Furthermore, Pound Wei also mentioned that Trump repeatedly warned the CCP not to aid Iran, emphasizing once again that Xi Jinping personally promised not to aid Iran. When the Chinese side expressed their results of the meeting with the U.S. via Xinhua News Agency, they did mention it; it was unavoidable. The question then becomes interesting: since you promised, why?

As soon as Xi boarded his plane, the CCP's propaganda machine immediately claimed that the U.S. warning was ineffective, stating that three Iranian planes—not just one—landed in China, and that the CCP does not care about U.S. sanctions. Aren't you pushing Chairman Xi into a pit of fire? Chairman Xi is still in the air, isn't he? Go check it out; the entire propaganda apparatus is filled with this message: "I don't care what the U.S. says." That's fine then.

Trump said, "Actually, I don't care whether you care or not, right?" Look at Trump's reaction. It doesn't matter. Anyway, I rejected Iran's seven-day ceasefire agreement. After the midterm elections, I will immediately resume bombing Iran. Don't talk to me about Iran restarting the strait or nuclear negotiations; that doesn't exist. You can only listen to me, the United States.

See that? What does it mean? This whole thing—didn't the CCP flip its stance as soon as Xi boarded the plane? Well, the U.S. said, "I already predicted this." So, the Iran issue isn't over yet. As long as the Iran issue remains, the CCP will be left hanging. If Xi kneels well this time, perhaps the news coming out will be that Iran has privately reached an agreement to cooperate with the U.S. on denuclearization. So, while the U.S. is handling Iran's denuclearization and cleaning up the battlefield, the CCP has knelt and opened up—that is one possibility. Right now, it is just Xi's facade.

He personally promised that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, the strait must be open, and he would not support Iran. Then, as soon as he boards the plane, they start flipping their stance with great fanfare. The U.S. understands what you mean, right? So, Trump wants an attitude from you after arriving. With this checklist ticked, look, the first thing is to show you how to completely eliminate that "mountain" to make you convinced, or at least make your legs go weak. And then.

Because the Iran issue is still dragging on, the sanctions under the Graham Act will be intensified, and accountability will be pursued. How are you dealing with Iran? Is it because of the CCP's support that they are so confident? You gave all four of your self-confidences to Iran, didn't you? If I don't investigate you, who should I investigate? So, do you see? Every link is a trap! And finally, we probably don't have time to talk about the Lee Jae-myung incident today. It's fine, we can talk about it tomorrow. That thing isn't urgent; it's also quite funny.

Let's look at the statement issued by the White House. Eight points, fentanyl—fentanyl is something the CCP doesn't want to mention, right? Then it urges Chairman Xi to increase refined oil production to stabilize global supply. Isn't this a slap in the face to Xi? Does Xi have enough oil himself? Due to Venezuela having no oil, Iran not giving oil, and Russia—now that you are buying oil, I have to...

Increase your tariffs, and Russia is almost flipping on you too. I ask Chairman Xi, he is already in the stage of using inventory, how can he increase refined oil products to stabilize global supply? Don't you just have to buy it from the U.S.? So, this move by Trump, isn't it a checkmate in one sentence?

And the funniest thing is that there were only eight points in total, and the giant panda took up one. There really wasn't anything special to talk about. The giant panda is very dull. It says, "What? If I, the giant panda, don't agree, you won't reach a consensus and rent me out?" Anyway, the giant panda is named Pingping. This name is well chosen, right? The U.S. says, "Look at this Pingping; it's not just in the White House or the archives, it's here to amuse us." This Pingping going to the zoo is also for the American people to enjoy; that's how it's played. Who named it Pingping? Avoiding the taboo of the honorable.

Don't they even understand this tradition? I think naming the panda Pingping either means they don't take Xi seriously at all, and the Propaganda Department is deliberately trying to embarrass him, or it was personally authorized by Xi. This exclusive authorization for the panda to represent him—Xi's meaning is, "Don't keep saying I'm Winnie the Pooh or a wild boar; the panda image is a bit better." I said it long ago; when Americans talk to me about pandas, I always say that pandas are essentially bears. And that bear is not a vegetarian. How you view black bears and brown bears is how you should view the wild nature of pandas, right? So.

If Xi Jinping uses a panda to represent himself, doesn't that also show that while it looks simple, honest, and cute, once it opens its mouth or extends its claws, it could cause a fatal threat at any minute? It can only be put in a cage for people to admire. Regarding this implication, didn't I say it was a bad omen? I wrote it in the title two days ago, didn't I?

There's even more ridiculous stuff! They say they reached a consensus on more favorable tariff treatment for 30 billion US dollars of non-sensitive goods from each side! There should be a more detailed interpretation this Monday. But to resolve this side of things—simply put, they said there will be a dedicated working group to resolve market access barriers in the agriculture sector. Isn't this just what I said: when Trump runs out of things to say in the end, he just goes back and forth with, "We're talking well, everyone is happy, and the farmers are happy." I called it: this time it mainly shows that the Chinese Communist Party is going to buy agricultural products.

So, when Trump has nothing else to say, he always brings up this thing about farmers being happy. Come on, because that's just the CCP spending money to help Trump buy votes, right? And what about this? Let's not even talk about American export products; look at import products like small appliances, toys, holiday decorations, and child safety seats. Haven't we basically seen these before? These are just the things I was telling you about a couple of days ago—I said that once negotiations are finished, it's definitely going to be about Yiwu and all those trivial things. I specifically told everyone: the CCP will say, "Oh, because of the trade war, you Americans won't even have holiday decorations." And I said this order will be placed.

It's definitely related to this, right? Because this market is huge, and there's no need for the US to rebuild this supply chain domestically, is there? These are just a few items here. Holiday decorations are for holidays, while small appliances, toys, and child seats are for holiday gifts. We got it right again. Look at that, I'm almost a little embarrassed. How is it that every single day, whatever we predict hits the mark, whatever we predict hits the mark? Well, I hope... back then I said Ma Dun-guo would get caught by Trump in the bedroom, and I gave him three marvelous plans; the third one was to directly kneel and surrender. Later on, it miraculously came true.

I must say, when we talk about things concerning Xi, I don't guarantee which one will hit the mark just like that, because right now even I don't know when my words will come true—it's just too interesting. We aren't doing it on purpose, are right? So this whole thing is just too much fun. Also, what else do they say? There is propaganda going around saying, "Oh, in Trump's speech, he said China and the US were World War II allies." Ah, this propaganda starts spreading, saying, "Oh, this proves they acknowledge the People's Republic of China fought the Japanese!" Acknowledge what?

Ah, China at that time wasn't ruled by you Communists; at that time, China and the US were indeed allies fighting side by side. Looking back at that is fine, but who asked you to steal the credit and deceive the world? Right? So you are an illegitimate government. What Trump meant was that we look back at the exchanges before you existed; once you came to power, I had nothing left to say to you, and I can only pin you down and beat you, sooner or later opening you up—do you believe it? Alright, let's chat about this much for today. It really has been quite a fruitful result, hasn't it? For us.