Not Afraid of Losing Household Registration! Taiwanese Artists Collectively Declare Allegiance, Wave the Five-Star Flag and Give Up National Health Insurance? Teaching Taiwanese to Sing Red Songs, Xi Jinping Pushes Through Illness, Blasts at the State Banquet, Will Absolutely Crush Taiwan Independence

The video mainly discusses the controversy sparked by Taiwanese artists and athletes making statements during the CCP's National Day, analyzes the status of Xi Jinping's recent public activities and the shift in his rhetoric regarding Taiwan (from opposing Taiwan independence to crushing Taiwan independence), dissects the phenomenon of the mainland using AI-generated scripts and old versions of speeches for National Day, and explores the economic pressure and the crisis of being harvested faced by the middle class and the bottom-tier population under the Common Prosperity policy.

Video link:

Full text:

Happy National Day everyone. Confessing under the national flag, wishing the motherland a beautiful landscape, and looking forward to the National Day at the next stop. Yesterday was the CCP's National Day, and some Little Pinks said they would raise the five-star flag in Ximending to challenge me to a fight, and then go over there. What a lie, two people even challenged me, they really have no integrity. In any case, this is also a day of shared pain for people on both sides of the strait. More than 19 Taiwanese artists, including athletes, have expressed their support for the CCP, wishing a happy birthday to the motherland of the five-star flag—that is their motherland—including Wu Kang-ren. However, Wu Kang-ren was half-smart this time. Wu Kang-ren released it through his studio this time, so he can say that the staff and agent I hired in the CCP country posted it due to political considerations, so you have to understand him, otherwise they would be disciplined by the Party branch, fired, or even sentenced. So Taiwanese people, you must have a democratic and compassionate mindset. He posted it in my name, right? This is emotional blackmail.

And the Ouyang sisters, we won't talk about these old regulars. That guy Huang An, right? And what else, Jiro Wang, Peter Ho, Ken Chu, Will Liu, Lin Ruiyang, including Zhang Chenguang and Michelle Chen, they even participated in the special CCP National Day program produced by CCTV, the kind where the five-star flag is meant to rule. Let's zoom in on this picture, who else is a guest? The basketball player from Banqiao, New Taipei City, be brave, just say who you are, just say you are a basketball player from Banqiao, New Taipei, what your name is, right? I went on the CCTV program of the CCP motherland to participate in their sports, I am so proud, I became a player in the CCP system, they cultivated me. So when are you people going to get your ID cards? Everyone says it's the motherland, yet you all hold Republic of China documents and passports that your motherland does not recognize. Of course, if you were misunderstood, because you have grown up for twenty or thirty years without this social experience, and didn't know that you would be used as a fool with utility value by the CCP, then you can very well state that actually, they tricked me into going there at the beginning, I thought it was just a normal sports performance activity, I didn't expect it to be labeled with the National Day holiday of eliminating Taiwan and eliminating the Republic of China with the five-star flag. So, I state here, I believe that once you post this, everyone will understand you, and if it were me who was misunderstood, I would also post this, so it's actually tacitly understood.

Of course, the Mainland Affairs Council warned these people last year. If they dared to post anything this year supporting the attack on Taiwan, the forceful reunification of Taiwan, or the CCP's military drills encircling and destroying Taiwan, eliminating the Republic of China, or echoing their October 1st bandit celebration remarks, the result—whether these people were truly terrified or whatever the case—was that they only said things like "the motherland is prosperous and flourishing," omitting support for military drills, reunification, and the encirclement of Taiwan, and even added a heart emoji. It's a very disgusting, abusive partner vibe, right? I can only say that for those top mega-stars, even if they aren't making money in the CCP's country right now, they already made a fortune shooting idol dramas in Taiwan 10, 20, or 30 years ago. These fines are just a drop in the bucket for them. And some people say, can we make people like Ouyang Nana give up Taiwan's health insurance? Let me say something heartbreaking and piercing: do you think their wealth cares whether they have Taiwan's health insurance? Suppose Elon Musk were Taiwanese; would he care whether he has to use Taiwan's health insurance? Or do you think when he gets sick, he pays out of pocket for a senior cadres' ward, a private hospital, with full-service care and no waiting in line? I don't need to elaborate further.

Of course, these actual penalties are merely administrative fines. In other words, much like illegal street parking, crossing double-yellow lines, or parking in a red-zone, it's a simple administrative fine; it's not a criminal case, and certainly doesn't require revoking household registration. But this year we can see that these people indeed did not dare to post those National Day remarks about attacking Taiwan anymore, yet they still posted that the motherland is the CCP's country. It's evident that these Taiwanese artists developing their careers in the CCP's country always claim they never talk about politics over there. Is that so? When you reposted this post, weren't you talking about politics? Can you choose not to repost it? I believe you all know it in your hearts. Look at that, even Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission Zhang Youxia was stripped of three posts before Xi Jinping's overseas trip—it wasn't even just being stripped of two posts. The disciplinary terms initially thrown at him by the Central Committee and Xi Jinping were what? Not abiding by Xi Jinping's political thought, not complying with the Party's decisions, and failing to obey the leadership of Xi Jinping's thought. Then you tell me—let me ask you, do Cai Qi, Wang Huning, and Xi Jinping hold positions called members of the Politburo Standing Committee? The Politburo Standing Committee of your own country can decide major national affairs, and then you tell me that in China, politics is never discussed? What kind of politics is allowed to be discussed in China? Only political correctness recognized and approved by Xi Jinping can be discussed.

Coming back to our point, have you noticed that Xi Jinping has been frequently attending events over the past two or three days? After returning from his US visit, his facial expression was extremely displeased. You wouldn't even know if he was attending someone's memorial ceremony, celebrating the CCP's National Day, or mourning revolutionary martyrs. Furthermore, his gait was extremely slow and strange, just like it has been these past few months. You could say that during the CCP celebrations mourning heroes, if you aren't happy, fine, but at least act sad. That clearly wasn't sadness; that was totally, "Are we done yet? My knees hurt so much, I've been wearing these towering heels for too long. This time I even wore 40-centimeter towering heels." Xi Jinping, have you ever thought that if you walked the runway as an international model, you might walk even better than them? You're a world beauty champion! Moreover, with the Fifth Plenary Session approaching and your fourth term coming up, would you be unhappy because of this? It must definitely be that chronic knee issue of yours that still hasn't been resolved, right? 안녕

However, what broke the spirits of Chinese people first this year wasn't whether Xi Jinping was dead or alive, whether his knee was amputated, or even talk about a grand military parade to rule Taiwan, but rather Hu Xijin, the former editor-in-chief of the Global Times. Yesterday, Hu Xijin published a pro-CCP National Day article, rambling on at length about China's rise and how great and powerful the CCP is. But do you know why he crashed and burned? Because netizens looked closely and found a very strange string of text in the very last line. Don't people understand yet? Wasn't this Hu Xijin using AI to write an article, or even training with AI beforehand? You take this AI model, DeepSeek—even though it's distilled from American tech later on—and you have it mimic my, Hu Xijin's, writing style to regularly churn out pieces for me. Today I want to suck up to the CCP, so help me write a pro-CCP piece, and when Hu Xijin copy-pasted it, he forgot to delete those final few paragraphs. So, using AI as a prompt to assist or generate things—I personally think as long as the legal copyright framework is well established, there's not too big of an issue. But the problem is that this Mr. Hu "the Dish-Licker" publicly advocated in August this year for a complete boycott of AI-generated people, events, stories, short dramas, and articles, saying that AI shouldn't replace a large number of real human jobs. Sure, then why don't you oppose Xi Jinping's grand AI era first? Xi Jinping still wants to develop robots to replace workers; do you dare to oppose that? You don't dare. Yet on National Day, you used AI prompts yourself and got caught red-handed. What are you, a hypocrite like Yue Buqun? You are Sima Nan, you are Sima "Nutcracker," saying one thing and doing another, your persona directly collapsing and getting heavily roasted. Truly a disgrace.

Today, I even specifically went to look for Xi Jinping's National Day speech, and it resulted in a very interesting phenomenon. Lots of Little Pinks were reposting the 11th National Day, Xi Jinping's National Day speech. But when I looked closely, why is Xi Jinping's National Day speech footage the exact same every single year? 2019, 2020, 2021... 2026, why are you all using the exact same thing? Or is Xi Jinping just that amazing, where the scene, the characters, the hair strands on his head, and that angle are completely identical, and the cadence of his speech is also entirely identical? Wow, was it AI-generated? As a result, I searched all over the internet and only discovered that there is only one version: the big speech by Xi Jinping on the Tiananmen Rostrum in 2019. That year's National Day also featured a grand military parade, with missiles below and tens of thousands of pink-clad PLA troops marching, shouting, "I pledge allegiance to the Chinese XXX," right? But now, a full six or seven years have passed, why don't you see a 2026 version of Xi Jinping on the gate tower saying, "Hello everyone, I am the next national leader, and I will rule over you until I am 150 years old, my platform shoes will be 70 centimeters tall, and in the future when I, Xi Jinping, live to 150, my height will be 430 centimeters"? Is it because Xi Jinping is about to kick the bucket? Actually, that's not it at all.

Yesterday morning on September 30, Xi Jinping had just appeared in Tiananmen Square with whom? Li Qiang, Zhao Leji, Wang Huning, and those members of the Politburo Standing Committee, doing what? Attending this floral tribute ceremony for the People's Heroes. Last night, he immediately appeared again at the Great Hall of the People for the 77th National Day reception banquet, where he even personally delivered a speech and made a public appearance twice in one day. Although his expression was thoroughly displeased throughout, do you know what? This flower-tributing ceremony originated in 2014; every year on September 30, Xi Jinping follows this custom. Therefore, Xi Jinping appearing in Tiananmen Square this year does not count as any abnormal political signal. But some people say, "Bailong, your argument doesn't make sense. If so, why hasn't Xi Jinping climbed up to the rostrum again for a full 6 years to declare the great rejuvenation of the Chinese Communist state?" Of course, some people provide an explanation: for the CCP, only years ending in 5 or 10 count as official major conventions. In other words, only in the first, fifth, and tenth years will there be major exercises, grand military drills, or major speeches.

But that is actually not the case. Look, 2024 is the 75th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It is a year ending in 5, right? Did he give a major speech? No, he used the same version as in 2019. However, 2019 was the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China. Even more interestingly, if you push this timeline back another 10 years to 2009, it was the 60th anniversary of the founding of the country, and the pattern was the same. The only difference is that the leader at the time was his former superior, Hu Jintao, who also delivered a major speech and held a grand military parade on October 1st. So the conclusion is simple: this kind of political arrangement only happens every 10 years—talking about attacking Taiwan, the great rejuvenation, that the whole world is Chinese, that we Chinese can fly like 'Blue Birds' now, and other such cliché bullshit. Therefore, we cannot see any political anomalies from this. But this year, there is an issue that we in Taiwan should pay attention to. It is not about whether Xi Jinping's platform shoes are 60 or 90 centimeters high, but rather his National Day banquet. At last year's 2025 National Day reception, when Xi Jinping talked about Taiwan, his original words were to 'deepen cross-strait exchanges and cooperation, and firmly oppose Taiwan independence separatist activities and the interference of external forces,' and so on. Note the verb 'oppose.' Well, a few days ago this year, his original words changed to 'deepen cross-strait cooperation, firmly strike against Taiwan independence separatists, oppose forces,' and so on. 'Firmly strike against Taiwan independence separatist forces, and advance the great cause of national reunification.'

Have you noticed? In the political terminology of the CCP, and in speeches delivered by leaders, including any word stamped on official documents—especially under the political ideology set by Wang Huning—it is not like us, the public, or legislators and officials in democratic countries, who can just say whatever comes to mind as long as the meaning is conveyed. No, no, no. On this land of China, for 5,000 years, every word in an imperial edict has been carefully considered. From 'firmly oppose' to 'strike against,' there is a practical meaning. A normal person should be able to understand that 'I oppose you' and 'I am now going to strike against you' are different. It has become an actual action, right? Although he added a sentence later that while striking, one must also promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations and national reunification, what does this mean? It means if you want peaceful reunification, you must strike and eliminate Taiwan independence elements. This time it is to be done by 'striking,' not just 'opposing.' It really means I am going to hit you. So these two conditions cannot be true at the same time. As our regular viewers know, in recent years, Xi Jinping has been conducting major purges and cleanups within his own military, and he is engaged in a new US-China Cold War model with the United States, right? Engaging in diplomatic races and competition in various fields. It is evident that Xi Jinping is truly not a normal person. If he were a normal person, he should have stopped doing these things long ago and focused on the economy first. But he is truly determined to impoverish China, drag down the military, and ruin the economy just to take Taiwan, even if it means delaying it by a year or two until his military is reorganized. He is indeed reorganizing it, and the possibility of small-scale combat has increased. The biggest risk is actually not our main island of Taiwan, but the Kinmen and Matsu regions. I must also remind you of one thing: we don't even need to mention that after the second Trump-Xi meeting, Beijing has been arranging elements like 'deepening strikes against Taiwan independence' and 'advancing reunification' in the same paragraph, spoken by Xi Jinping himself. This signifies that he wants to put out signals of exchange, deterrence, and unification all at once, because there are different groups to be united, right? It is under this premise.

These 19 pro-CCP Taiwanese are truly appalling, right? Saying that is the motherland they yearn for. Have you noticed one person, Ms. Chen Zhuyin? Why didn't she dare to say 'Happy Birthday to the Motherland' and display the five-star flag this time? Because you are running for New Taipei City Councilor, so you don't dare to say it, right? On one hand, the CCP uses the political level to strike against Taiwan independence separatist forces and denies that the Republic of China still exists, using even stronger language. On the other hand, it uses culture, entertainment, and sports to strengthen 'exchanges, heart-to-heart communication, unity of purpose, motherland China Taiwan, New Taipei Banqiao.' How much more specific do you want to be? You might as well name every neighborhood and every street. In other words, while using threatening language against specific political targets, they use exchanges, cultural programs, and sports to shape a different narrative of integration for people in different sectors of Taiwanese society. When someone points this out, you just say, 'Look, politics is politics, sports is sports,' right? How is it that the CCP wins again? So these sets of things are not contradictory; in the CCP's narrative, they can simultaneously conduct exchanges with Taiwan.

Remember our show yesterday about Xi Jinping planning to fully harvest the wealth of China's middle class and above? Well, by the time you see this, it was probably yesterday, but anyway, within the last couple of days, Xi Jinping himself confirmed it. The October 1 issue of Qiushi magazine published an article signed by Xi Jinping titled "Strengthening Inclusive, Foundational, and Baseline Livelihood Construction," which once again mentioned common prosperity through income distribution, ensuring the expansion of so-called low-income groups, expanding middle-income and other demographics, and letting them achieve common prosperity together. So, shouldn't everyone be happy about this? Take a look at the ratio of likes and views to comments—it completely doesn't add up. What does that mean? It means many Chinese people actually understand: this "common prosperity" you talk about is about common-prospering our money into the hands of you, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), rather than you, the CCP, using your common prosperity to common-prosper us at the bottom. This is Xi Jinping's National Day gift to every Little Pink who praises them. Don't think that making three to five thousand a month means you won't be harvested; your turn will come sooner or later. When entrepreneurs, big bosses, and the middle class are harvested, their costs are simply passed down to you, the lowly assembly-line worker, and in the end, you get harvested anyway.

So, the pretty words sound great, but what does it boil down to? Little Pink, don't think that because you don't own farmland—just like I explained a moment ago, working on the assembly line is your farmland. You're suffering from deflation, you're broke, and you secretly feel like carrying out a Xianzhong attack out of frustration. Fine, no problem. Then I, Jinping, will make the middle class and those above them slowly grow poor too, so you'll feel a bit better inside. When everyone is poor, no one will try to keep up with the Joneses. Have you ever thought about why we don't all slowly get rich together? Because the current Chinese economic fiscal situation makes it impossible. Reuters and Bloomberg both analyzed this just a few days ago. Not only has Beijing admitted they have no money and are going to harvest wealth here—of course, we won't go into detail here, and those interested can go back and watch yesterday's episode specifically discussing Beijing's fiscal and economic video. Now, I still want to strongly condemn someone here: who is it? That Taoyuan Xiao Yuan from the Taiwan Province of the CCP. Don't you often wave the five-star flag in Taiwan's night markets and go around saying, "Hello everyone, I'm Betel Nut Brother, hello, hello, hello"? How is it that this time you didn't wish the CCP's five-star flag a happy birthday on your Douyin? Are you kidding me? You even filmed a video saying, "This is my Mainland Travel Permit for Taiwan Residents, as long as you get this card, you are blah blah blah." Nonsense! This is not even the genuine CCP ID card that people in Beijing and Shanghai get; you are simply making a fool of yourself, just like Guan Chang. Why do I mention Guan Chang? Guan Chang said on Douyin a few days ago, "Happy birthday to the motherland, the CCP," but back on YouTube, he changed his tune to say, "Unification is impossible, absolutely impossible." What on earth are you trying to do? OK, I don't know how to conclude, let's leave it at that. That's all for today's video. If you like it, remember to subscribe; if you don't like it, make sure to block me. I am Bajiong, see you next time. Bye.