Revoke the Guan Chang's household registration! Running to Xiamen to film United Front propaganda, Taiwan's

The video mainly discusses the statements and actions of public figures such as Chen Chih-han (Guanzhang), entertainer Aya, and Tsai Kang-yong regarding cross-strait stances and the united front background. Host Bajiong criticizes Guanzhang and Aya for going to mainland China to shoot promotional videos, supporting "one country, two systems," but not daring to give up their Taiwanese citizenship. At the same time, he analyzes Tsai Kang-yong's post on Weibo stating that he does not support Taiwan independence, and mentions recent CCP pressure tactics against Taiwan, trends regarding the Fifth Plenary Session, and the view of dragging down the CCP through economic and technological competition.

Video link:

Full text:

Being naive is truly shameless. As the CCP holds the Fifth Plenary Session, there is also Taiwan's situation. Guanzhang Chen Chih-han and his entourage are taking different forms as Taiwanese people. Among them, this CCP-fawning Guanzhang, Chen Chih-han, ran to Xiamen under the CCP. Isn't there a CCP propaganda slogan there called something like "one country, two systems, reunify China"? He ran in front of it to shoot a promotional video. Do you all know what this behavior is? CCP-fawning mainland spouses like Enqi and Yaya holding the five-star red flag and the like over there—who else has done this and had it exposed? Doing this was at the behest of the CCP, or doing this could gain huge traffic on the CCP's platforms. Who is this person? Our former good comrade-in-arms, no matter what grievances he and I had in the past, let's look at the facts objectively: he once stood in front of this slogan, sang that CCP-fawning song, and said the things Guanzhang has said. I don't know if the two of you swapped souls or what, or if you, Guanzhang, after watching the united front documentary, feel that Chen Boyuan giving up is truly pathetic. Let's first take everyone to see this disgusting Guanzhang, because this video, according to the information I have obtained at this moment, is like this: he only dares to post it on the CCP platform Douyin, and he doesn't dare to post this video on YouTube. Are you afraid of costing votes for the Kuomintang or the Taiwan People's Party? Are you afraid that those anti-communist supporters of the Taiwan People's Party will feel you are costing them votes? Today is October 25, 2026, which is Taiwan Retrocession Day. After the First Sino-Japanese War, Japan colonized Taiwan. On October 25, 1945, the Chinese government held the surrender ceremony of the Taiwan Province of the China Theater of War to Japan in Taipei City, and Taiwan and the Penghu Islands officially returned to the sovereignty jurisdiction of China. Make it clear: the Republic of China. Make it clear: Chiang Kai-shek. Make it clear: this year is the 81st anniversary of Taiwan's retrocession, as well as the first anniversary of the establishment of Taiwan Retrocession Day by the state, and even more so the Chinese people's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist [War].

This guy must be reading from a script; how could he possibly speak like that? He mentioned the 81st anniversary of the victory in the war against fascism, claiming that the retrocession of Taiwan and the victory in the War of Resistance were achieved through the bloody battles of all Chinese sons and daughters. He says compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait should remember this history together, hoping for future integration, shared prosperity, and the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. This is the 'Gym Master's' greatest hope for both sides. Chen Boyuan has said things like this before, and he even said he was influenced by the United Front to say such things. Why don't you make it clear? The Republic of China recovered and retroceded Taiwan—why don't you make that clear? Or say it was under administration, whatever. Why don't you hold the flag of the Republic of China and film a video in front of it? Didn't you say this is also China? Then why don't you dare to hold the Republic of China flag? I ask the CCP, which claims to be anti-Japanese and the 'mainstay of the War of Resistance,' why did the Japanese army keep attacking the 'leftovers' of the Republic of China and the National Revolutionary Army? Why didn't they go straight for the jugular and attack the 'mainstay,' the all-important CCP? And in those earthen kilns, wouldn't it have been easy to just send in bombers for a full-scale bombardment? I ask you, the ID card you have now, which you call 'returning,' was it issued by the CCP? Why is it that every time you return to Taiwan, you say, 'I hold a Chinese ID card,' and when you're in the Republic of China, I mean, I'm talking about the CCP ID card. Speak clearly on Douyin! When you're selling goods on Douyin, you say, 'We are all people of the Republic of China. Today, if anyone says, "I am a person of the Republic of China," I'll immediately draw a set and give away another set. Are there four sets in stock? Right now, immediately! Only 100 sets left, none now. Now adding more, adding more, adding more! Distributing 100,000 yuan to everyone!' Why don't you say this bullshit when you're filming in Xiamen? You're really a coward. Have you gotten a CCP ID card or not? According to the logic of your video, the so-called compatriots on both sides should integrate and be a republic, right? Then why does the CCP want to fuck the Republic of China? If the CCP hadn't launched the campaign to fuck the Republic of China, wouldn't both sides belong to the same Republic of China? So who split this 'One China' you want? Wasn't it the People's Republic of China? Wasn't its predecessor the Chinese Soviet Republic? It was the CCP that, for the sake of power, to become 'Zhao family members,' and to support a bunch of Yang Lanlans, led to the current situation where social security is mandatory, everything is a mess, and there's a 20% tax on overseas insurance policies, so they used armed force to attack the Republic of China, forcing our central government to relocate to where? Taipei. So I ask, why don't you clarify on Douyin that the so-called 81st anniversary of Taiwan's retrocession is a thing, while the People's Republic of China has only been founded for 77 years? How is this logic any different from the Little Pinks who tried to smear me a few days ago? A few days ago, a Little Pink said that I, Ba Jiong, had a wife and children in mainland China over 30 years ago, and even had a business, what was it called? A new energy vehicle company. My god, if I could run that business 30 years ago, I would have beaten Musk by now. And he said, 'What did Ba Jiong end up doing? Abandoning his wife and children, earning red money to go back to Taiwan to engage in Taiwan independence.' Do you have any brains? 30 years ago I was 0 years old, or even in my past life, I was at a negative age. How can the debts of a past life be counted on me? And you know I was Chinese in my past life? And you know I had a wife and children in China in my past life? And according to this logic of smearing, my children's age... no wonder these logic-impaired Little Pinks exist. 'Taiwan was retroceded by our CCP 81 years ago, but we only have a 77-year history of founding the country.' What? That's the same as me! How did I give birth to children older than me without even knowing it? This is the CCP narrative ruining you all. Even the internet trolls have no logic when making up stories, and you all think it's normal. Not to mention anything else, if I had an electric car company 30 years ago and human resources to exploit, then who would I be today? Would it even be Tesla's turn to spray? Today it would be 'Jiong-sla'! As for the rest, I don't want to say it. I know a senior who told me in a dream that he really wanted to roast the 'Gym Master,' but unfortunately, he is no longer here after three gunshots. So let's review what concepts he wanted to tell us. I want to share my thoughts with everyone. I'll speak for a short while.

As a Taiwanese person, the moment you speak up for China, my intuitive thought is that deep down, you simply treat it as a tool to make money. As a public figure, you just want to earn donations from the mainland, showing no shame, acting like a brazen scoundrel. You just want to take endorsement deals for Chinese mobile games. I'll just ask one question, and there is absolutely no way you can refute me: If you really want to be reunified so badly, or if you support China so much that you think China is truly amazing, a great superpower where everything is better than in Taiwan, then I dare to ask you today—just like these entertainers and politicians, I used to say something often, and I really don't want to argue with people like you. I'll leave you with a sentence, and you just need to answer it. As for your answer, you will definitely try to forcefully rationalize it, but you'll keep rambling on until I can't even bear to listen, finding it both laughable and absurd—why don't you renounce your citizenship and move to the mainland to naturalize? Since it's so good, go ahead and naturalize! Once you naturalize, you become a Chinese person. How about that? Since you like China so much, go! I'm too lazy to even look at you anyway. Isn't that it? You just treat this thing as a business. You are relying on treason. Trading the country for glory—people like this are the most shameless, despicable, and base. Mean, shameless, and utterly lacking in dignity, they betray their country, then demand benefits from both sides, tricking mainlanders into commercial sponsorships and donations. Such despicable wretches, such shameless scoundrels—Taiwan actually has quite a few of them. If you really tell these lowlifes to move over there, they wouldn't dare. Of course the money they earn is RMB, but their citizenship remains registered in Taiwan. While breathing the air of freedom with one side, they take money given to them by a communist country with the other. You don't genuinely like the Chinese Communist Party, and you don't genuinely support China, you know? You just treat it as a business, that's all. So, Little Pinks, let's just listen and take it with a grain of salt. Besides them, who else? Who else? The has-been Taiwanese entertainer Aya, yesterday or maybe the day before, supported a so-called China—don't try to forcefully argue with me that it's the Republic of China—she reposted a One China video of Xi Jinping reported by the Chinese Communist Party's official state media, Xinhua News Agency, which featured narratives and images shouting about the reunification of the motherland, the five-star red flag, Taiwan, and so on. Don't make people die of laughter. Which one of you has actually obtained a CCP-version ID card, or is it that you got them but don't dare to make it public? Why don't you dare to make your own

Then there is this Kevin Tsai. On the day before he attended the establishment of Chiang Wan-an's campaign headquarters, he made a statement on Weibo, which could also be considered a farewell. He posted a long article that rushed to the top two spots on Weibo's trending list. Right at the beginning, he wrote that he has always hoped for friendly exchanges across the strait, that he has never supported Taiwan independence, and so on. Finally, he wrote something akin to a farewell to the Chinese market or Weibo. Of course, this is just our speculation; we cannot be certain of exactly what he meant. But beyond that, before this statement, before opposing Taiwan independence, and before saying he did not support Taiwan independence, Kevin Tsai had also reposted a 'dududu' meme, and outsiders were saying, 'Why are you mocking Chiang Wan-an like this?' So I think it is actually a tacit understanding. But why can we still accept Kevin Tsai saying on Weibo that he has never supported Taiwan independence? Because after Kevin Tsai made his statement, those who were dissatisfied were not the supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or the 'Blue Birds' (young activists), but the Little Pinks and the Chinese people. They retorted to Kevin Tsai, saying, 'You didn't say there is only one China, you didn't say you support the reunification of the two sides, you didn't say Taiwan belongs to our five-star flag.' So, Kevin Tsai's room for ambiguity is far greater than that of Holger Chen or Aya Liu, right? One of them used a video of Xi Jinping to stand on stage, and the other posed for photos at a signature spot of CCP propaganda. As for Kevin Tsai saying he has never supported Taiwan independence, it can indeed be interpreted as opposing a change to the status quo, because the U.S. government has also stated many times that it does not support Taiwan independence and maintains the status quo, and that both sides are not allowed to unilaterally change the status quo—that is, the Taiwan authorities and the Beijing authorities are not allowed to unilaterally change the status quo. Otherwise, why can U.S. military personnel, officials, and congressmen come to Taiwan at any time, and you in Beijing protest? And the status quo is that the Republic of China in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu is not under the control or command of the CCP, right? And the 'Taiwan independence' mentioned by the U.S. government refers to Taiwan itself drafting a constitution, founding a nation, and creating a new constitution to break away from the concept of the Republic of China. I believe that, although this is the aspiration of many, it is currently not something that must be done immediately at this moment, a time of turbulent cross-strait relations and competitive China-U.S. relations, especially when facing Xi Jinping's leadership transition. After all, we have always been gradually 'Taiwanizing' the Republic of China. If there is a smarter approach with less sacrifice, I believe more centrist voters will support it and will not be constantly disturbed by these united front tactics. For example, what? Cooperating with the U.S. to continue competing with the CCP in terms of finance and competition in various fields, making the CCP burn money, and making the CCP's finances go the way of the Soviet Union's bankruptcy. We can all see that China's policy advancement in the past year or two is completely based on 'paying off debt with new debt.' And in these few years, the CCP has modified the stock market twice, and is about to modify it again recently. Why? The youth unemployment rate has also been modified. But we must make China believe, make Xi Jinping believe, that you are about to surpass the U.S., so you must keep borrowing money to compete with the U.S. But the U.S. has the ability to compete because the global AI stock market is led by the U.S., and global stock markets are following the U.S. dollar and following the U.S. It has created many, many, many new opportunities and business prospects, as well as new technologies, and you have to distill them. If you continue to compete with him in technology and in various fields, won't you eventually go bankrupt and become like the Soviet Union? So we also need to make Xi Jinping more and more anxious, more and more like the Chongzhen Emperor, and let those ordinary people under the Soviet era of rule engage in non-cooperation movements, including those in Czechoslovakia, Poland, and other regions that were ruled before, right? We have already used violence, we have already resisted, but in a helpless situation, each of us obeys on the surface, but we do not obey sincerely. To give a very simple example, your love for the Party and the country is just a formality. When you are shouting 'Long live the Communist Party,' in your heart you are thinking, 'Which Dongguan hotel am I going to tonight? Who am I going to find tonight? That AI short drama seems pretty good, right?' You are thinking about this in your heart; you are not saying, 'I really want to support the Communist Party.' Lacking such a soul, then all the CCP's policies, just cooperate on the surface, live your life as you should. This is the psychological state of many people, which is the same as the behavior of people in the regions ruled by the Soviet Union back then. Finally, let's look at Kevin Tsai's appearance, and we will know. Attending a DPP rally in Taiwan, he actually has to be bundled up tightly, and then attending Chiang Wan-an's event, Kevin Tsai doesn't need to wear a mask. If he wants to go, he goes. Let me ask you, the CCP Central Committee has said it will respect our Taiwan system and model, which also means you acknowledge that Taiwanese people can freely choose to support the DPP or the Kuomintang, right? Then, if an artist with a People's Republic of China ID card publicly states in Beijing or Shanghai that they support the DPP or that they support the Kuomintang, and that Taiwan's election model is great, can be used as a reference, and can be discussed—can we change the 'clapping to pass' National People's Congress to something like county and city councilors or legislators? Our National People's Congress actually has a constituent service office in Guizhou, and...

to help me assist with petitioning, do you not want this, can we discuss it? Let me ask you: people are sentenced, charged with picking quarrels and provoking trouble, imprisoned, and given administrative punishments. But let me ask you, among these Taiwanese artists who declare their support for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which one has been imprisoned? Which one has received an administrative punishment? Which one has been detained? Even though many people believe Ko Wen-je is corrupt, he can still walk around freely to this day, and he can continue to hold press conferences to say whatever he wants to say. So let me ask you, regarding those of you who have fallen from grace recently—whether it is Huang Qifan, Zhang Youxia, or even Qin Gang from the past—you also say he is corrupt, yet you do not dare to say how much money he embezzled, nor do you dare to let him walk around freely and hold press conferences. Can these be compared? If this is the case, how do you have the nerve to say you want to respect our system? It is very bizarre. You say you hope Taiwan will voluntarily return and implement one country, two systems, but then you say Taiwan is already the territory of the CCP and is already under one country, two systems. What kind of self-contradictory logic is this? One moment you say in the future you must definitely be my wife—even if you are not now, you will be in the future, and you are, were, and will be in the future—and then in your very next sentence you say you are already my wife and this cannot be denied. Which one is actually the current state of affairs? What is most ridiculous is that yesterday the CCP even released a video through CCTV shot from space by their satellite, Jilin-1, overlooking Taiwan, claiming every street was clearly visible. The US can also capture things very clearly; it is just a question of whether to make it public. Otherwise, why would you in Beijing impose a 300-kilometer radius flight ban? Why? And why show things like the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall and the Taipei Dome, paired with songs like "Clouds of My Hometown, Return"? I think pairing it with that song about the Fujian aircraft carrier would be even better. Furthermore, the PLA Daily also published an article warning that China will eventually achieve reunification, and even discussed how to handle contingencies related to Taiwan independence, threatening that those who understand should feel afraid, sending out such strong intimidation signals. Actually, this is very obvious: dogs that have a fine style and can win battles do not bark. You clearly have absolute crushing power to resolve this long-standing dispute—a short pain is better than a long pain, and you could resolve it in a single day. Yet you do not do it, and instead you drag it out for over seventy years. This means you still have to rely on intimidation and bribery to agitate Taiwan, thereby lowering Taiwan's unity and morale so that you have the strength to launch a so-called war, while spreading doubt about the US to undermine Taiwan-US relations. This precisely indicates that the closed-door meeting Xi Jinping is currently holding, the Fifth Plenary Session, is in deep crisis. Outsiders are speculating that the number of attendees this time might be even lower than the smallest attendance during the Mao Zedong era, and subsequent plenums like the Sixth and Seventh, and even the 21st National Congress, including changes to the cross-strait situation, can all be seen after this Fifth Plenary Session concludes. How so? We can judge how his future political atmosphere toward Taiwan and domestic Chinese politics will develop based on changes to the way he governs the party, as well as who has fallen and who has been promoted. I will not elaborate further here; once they release more information and the closed-door meeting ends, we will make further inferences and verify them. Yesterday, we released a one-and-a-half-hour AI short drama, which is entirely written with great realism and is my own personal creation. Not a single word mentions Xi Jinping or the condition of Chinese society, but every single line of the plot reveals the current reality of Chinese society. Remember to go watch it, and remember to tell me where you found the easter eggs and touching moments. Today's video ends here; if you like it, remember to subscribe to me, and if you don't like it, make sure to block me. I am Bajiong, see you next time, bye.