【Luther Society】 9/29/2026

This episode mainly explores the diplomatic game following the meeting between President Trump and Xi Jinping, with U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns making tough remarks regarding China's weaponization of rare earths and critical materials. It also analyzes the smuggling and illegal immigration on the California coast, the external forces behind the attempted terrorist attack in London, the U.S.-Russia joint effort in Geneva to remove human oversight clauses for AI weapons, the crash of a Russian Tu-95 strategic bomber, and provides an in-depth analysis of the actual development progress of China's H-20 stealth bomber.

Video Link:

Full Transcript:

Hello, viewers. Welcome to today's September 29, 2026, episode of Lude Media's "Dr. Yan Speaks." Let's see what good and interesting news we have brought you today, news that is well-founded and makes the Xi-led CCP scream in agony. First, I want to show you an interesting video. I think this video, especially for our viewers in Taiwan, will help you understand how the CCP sends people to the shores of Taiwan, right? Including, I think, the way they send dead pigs is likely the same method, because it's quite possible they are all handled this way. Of course, this happened in California, and someone just posted it online.

Just last Saturday morning, the coast here in California didn't seem to have many people, so early in the morning, two jet skis, driven by unidentified smugglers, sped toward the shore. Let's watch while we talk. Do you see that? Two jet skis speeding toward the shore, and then they dropped two people off right here, right? Just smuggling them in. Because the U.S. border is being guarded so strictly now, they rely on this kind of smuggling. Let me show you. You see it, right? They got off directly. That's one person, and there seems to be another one there. Anyway, it looks like two people got off in the video, and then these two jet skis didn't stop; they didn't come ashore, they just turned around and sped off.

But fortunately, under Trump's leadership, even on the California coast, the response is extremely rapid. As you all just saw, there was someone taking pictures nearby; this looks like a tourist, right? It's considered a remote area with fewer people. But look here, they just ran ashore and were caught immediately! Wait a second, there's an arrest in progress. This one is still running over here, thinking there was only one jet ski, right? In reality.

Another one came over there. They thought it was just one jet ski, but in reality, look, the jet ski turned around, uh, and they caught him too. By the way, everyone knows that running on the beach is very, very difficult, right? And they were riding big jet skis, so you definitely have nowhere to hide. Look, they were taken down and put on the ground! So it's very interesting. Smuggling at the border is getting harder and harder now. So you ask, why do they still risk their lives to use these methods to smuggle in? Isn't it obvious that they are here on a mission? Isn't it?

Anyway, not a single one can be allowed to stay! Not a single one can be allowed to get inside. So I think, like in Taiwan, didn't they say a few days ago that there were two or three people from the mainland who just pulled up to one of your cities in a small life raft? And then they said it took a week to catch those two people, but they said there were three life jackets on that boat. They said there was news that the third person was confirmed not to exist, but I don't think that's easy to say, right? Uh, the third person's life jacket was left there; were they really that meticulous in their work? And then they said those two people were in Taiwan.

They are going everywhere saying he is living on this street, wandering around everywhere, right? Why is it that I find it so hard to believe? What kind of handover takes a whole week and still isn't finished? And then, if he gets deported back to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by Taiwan, wouldn't that mean even his return train ticket is waived, right? You really, really have to be careful about this kind of method! Whether Mexican drug cartels can pull this off, or terrorists can pull this off, the CCP can do it too, right? I specifically wanted to show everyone this video. Alright, let's say hello to our audience friends here. Someone named KAERUUSHU said good morning, good morning! That must be a friend from the other hemisphere, right? Alright, let's take a look at some other news.

This President Trump, uh, yesterday, uh, when a reporter asked him, "Oh, regarding your meeting with Xi, how do you feel about it overall?" Trump said.

An extremely good meeting, very cordial, very respectful, right? This was a truly fantastic meeting. If it were from zero to ten, I would give it a twelve. Look at how much Trump enjoyed this opportunity to meet with Xi, right? Actually, you ask where those extra two points came from? That must be when Trump looked at that big guy's entourage walking over, hehe, I was thinking in my heart, this is definitely doing something even better than good, right? Talking about that granite, uh, tarmac, the fact that Trump threw out so many photos yesterday is also way beyond the ten-point mark. Not to mention, uh, the bitterness-relieving meal, Les Misérables, the National Archives, and that eagle, oh, the list goes on and on.

Right? But, uh, we also know that after Xi went back on this trip, he didn't hold back on mobilizing all sorts of bootlickers and stooges to fiercely fawn over him. I'll show you a bizarre one. This was specifically translated into Chinese by RFI, looking at an article from Le Monde in France, which said that during Xi Jinping's visit to Washington, the Trump administration suffered consecutive diplomatic blunders, right? It says some of these blunders involved China policy, while others concerned state banquet and protocol arrangements, reflecting that the Trump administration's preparation and coordination in handling complex diplomatic issues seemed rather inadequate. Oh my god! Well, wouldn't you know, they managed to bootlick from yet another novel angle. So, because I felt this was written in a way that made me, uh,

utterly unexpected, I'm sharing it with everyone. Let's see, uh, this Le Monde, I don't know which kind of stooge wrote this piece, saying, uh, what was the first blunder? It says, uh, Trump asked Xi Jinping whether he was willing to buy American weapons, right? Saying, oh, look, since the Tiananmen crackdown, the United States has maintained an arms embargo against the CCP, and bringing this up now is unusual, how so? Le Monde stated that, look, Trump's handling of sensitive diplomacy is ad-hoc and impromptu.

Oh my god! France, you guys, being the absolute best at kneeling and surrendering, just stop putting on an act here, alright? Ah, French media saying Trump brought this up with Xi Jinping, how do you know what Trump actually brought up? Did he ask, "Do you want to buy our American weapons? If you don't want to buy them, why are you so interested in our F-35s, trying every possible way to smuggle even a cockpit canopy into the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?" Right? So that single sentence naturally had an ad-hoc element, naturally had an impromptu feel to it. But that sensitive point ultimately ended up slapping Xi right in the face, didn't it? The second one is even more ridiculous. France, as the country of origin for *Les Misérables*, actually claimed that arranging *Les Misérables* for the state banquet was a blunder.

Ah, saying that because, uh, during the anti-extradition bill protests in Hong Kong at the time—actually, it didn't just start with the anti-extradition movement, it was already being sung in Hong Kong back during the 2014 Umbrella Movement, "Do You Hear the People Sing?"—was already widely sung there, but it just became even more widely sung during the anti-extradition movement. Saying, oh, look, Hong Kong people were singing this song back then, yet the US side actually arranged for it to be sung at the state banquet. And what's more, there are related videos on social media saying, oh, this is extremely inappropriate because, uh, this music has political connotations, indicating that US protocol personnel perhaps did not fully consider the song's relationship with the political events in Hong Kong.

Ah, can it really be interpreted that way? Isn't it precisely because they considered it very thoroughly that they arranged this song? And furthermore, if you go listen to the video released on online social media regarding the chorus being sung at the state banquet, I clearly heard, and as this singer, this performing artist walked down—he was originally standing at the front, and as he sang, he walked toward the guests, and when he walked up beside the guests, one of the lines was clearly, "Do you hear the people sing?" Ah, can you hear the people singing?

Xi and Peng Liyuan had completely no reaction, and none of their accompanying staff or interpreters had any awareness of this either, right? As a result, look, Le Monde finds some stooge from goodness knows where, and starts fighting this injustice for them. You all knew that it was sung during the anti-extradition movement to defend freedom and promote democratic reform protests, so what's inappropriate about it? Doesn't this simply mean the protest was brought right to your doorstep?

And what else? The third issue was about showing Xi that photo of Biden's autopen. It amused Xi so much that he laughed and said it was humiliating the former US president. Why wasn't that photo specifically put there just to guard against Xi Jinping? That photo had been hanging in that White House hallway for a long time, and Biden didn't even say anything about it. So what about Xi Jinping, right? If he's willing to laugh, can you block his mouth? You can't say that when taking Xi Jinping around, upon seeing Biden, your assistant has to rush over and gag him to stop Xi Jinping from laughing, right? You should say Xi Jinping laughed so loudly while Trump was introducing it very earnestly, saying, "This is our President Biden's autopen," and Xi let out a huge laugh—that shouldn't happen.

Is it Xi himself who doesn't respect diplomatic protocol? Isn't it? So, as they say, oh, it really is unwatchable. This article is truly bizarre, and I specially wanted to share it with everyone. Well, then let's continue looking at this. Look, US Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns has once again published content regarding the Chinese Communist Party's state. This morning, uh, just posted today, published on social media. Look at the first one, which talks about the CCP's state—why is this image so big?

Right, he said that last April, the CCP's state introduced an export licensing system targeting rare earth elements and magnets. By October 9, China further weaponized this, expanding it to the entire world. Nowadays, China has escalated the weaponization to an even greater degree, stipulating that any operation to leave China for conglomerate business is illegal. China can arrest personnel, prosecute them, freeze assets, and impose exit bans, right? Just this short sentence, in both Chinese and English, was posted together on Twitter and other platforms—I don't know if it was simultaneously posted on Weibo.

Obviously, the CCP hates mentioning this. First is human rights; second is the Party controlling the entire country; third is the weaponization of resources and commodities, right? Taking the whole world hostage as human prisoners. So you see, touching on every sore spot. Then besides that, Burns posted another one—what did it say? This one is even more ruthless. He said.

China has weaponized its monolithic status as the sole source of certain materials produced, and is using this to target the entire world. We have told them this is unacceptable. We will not allow ourselves to live in a world where we must go to China and kowtow, kowtow just to do business on our own terms. So when you put these two posts together, without needing to say much, everyone can see what the CCP's state is like, right? Everywhere it projects the image of someone holding hostages—the image of a villain, a rogue, a terrorist. And this was posted by the US Ambassador to China, you know, remarks from the ambassador.

No matter how lightly a diplomat can possibly phrase things, they simply cannot word it heavily. This means that right now, this Xi-Trump summit, right? Oh, watching it, while they are still bragging about it back home in China, the rhetoric has already reached this point. Diplomatically, people are now explicitly saying that you are weaponizing, you are holding the whole world hostage, you are holding hostages, and we have already told you this is unacceptable, and moreover we won't live in such a world. The problem is.

Can Xi accept this? He cannot accept it! Doesn't he just want you to—oh, the moment I flex, you immediately kneel down, right? What he still envisions is the state of the Great Qing dynasty with myriad nations coming to pay tribute. Oh, he doesn't stop to think that even when the Great Qing dynasty was holding court for myriad nations there, Emperor Guangxu was still very polite when dealing with others, right? Emperor Guangxu wasn't such a Wolf Warrior, nor did he show that uncultured vibe. Trump now sees things clearly too. The rhetoric has already reached this degree! The US will never tolerate a world like the one under the CCP's state. So that makes things simple, doesn't it? Then接下来 straight up.

Flip the table over, wouldn't that work? Right? You mentioned the 30 billion list we talked about yesterday, right? I saw many audience members leaving comments after the show ended, saying that this list really looks like it's being reversed, right? You can tell that trade between the US and the CCP's state isn't really normal business anymore; it's mainly about forcing you to come over and pay money to buy the things the US wants to sell you, right? What the US cares about most is, for example, selling you agricultural products, soybeans, or timber—well, this equates to, first, Trump's voting base, and second, a much larger revenue stream for the US economy, etc. That's what they want. As for decoupling and severing supply chains with you, the US isn't afraid at all; it's you, Xi, who is scared right now, right?

Now Burns' remarks after the Xi-Trump summit represent the current consensus of the US government. Look, they invite you over, right? Telling you you'll be wined and dined, treated well, and treated like a human being. Telling you CCP folks, if you open up now, it's still not too late! Look, if you don't know what open up means, let's look back at the treaties signed during the First and Second Opium Wars back in the Qing dynasty, right? And after signing those treaties, you still refused to trade and do business with the rest of the world, still stubbornly clinging to your old ways, still isolating yourselves from the world, and furthermore, failing to speak human words or do human deeds—then I'm sorry.

The First Sino-Japanese War, right? The Eight-Nation Alliance, right? In the end, they beat you until you submitted, didn't they? So you see, the words have been made so clear.

Even if the evidence is handed to you on a silver platter, once you go back, the U.S. side will put it on the wall, right? This is what I meant: first, they give you a narrative, and then they give you a notice. After that, the rest of the matter is just like a criminal prosecution on the U.S. side, right? Hey, court hearings, preparing new evidence, and then arresting people? Those are all subsequent steps; it's not about whether you want it or not, it has nothing to do with you. The most you'll have to do is get arrested, appear in court, or get locked up. Alright, let's look at this.

Speaking of AI, right? Before the CCP came, wow, the momentum they built up, saying, 'Oh, this AI, it needs to be jointly managed by the U.S. and China,' right? Do you remember OpenAI's Sam Altman, whose brain isn't very clear either, even colluding with Elon Musk, saying, 'Oh, if Xi and Trump could jointly decide on legislation or something, regulating AI would be a blessing for the whole world,' and that he would be willing to let them win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Then, after all that hype, Trump didn't pay any attention at all. After it ended, among the results released by both sides, one item stated that regarding AI, both sides would establish regular contact and a hotline for notifications in case of accidents. Some people were applauding, so I'll just tell everyone: isn't this just like the Department of War and the CCP's Ministry of National Defense establishing a hotline and a communication mechanism?

It has already reached the point of swords drawn and bows bent; this is just a necessary procedure, not at all about the two sitting together to jointly legislate, discuss, develop, or invest. It is completely not the game the Xi-CCP wants. Look at Trump today, specifically waiting for all the reporters to state this attitude once again.

It's that the entire CCP and the far-left forces it pushes behind the scenes, including the Democratic Party now, seem to have all stood together again—I don't know why—just to drag down the development of AI, or you can call it SI. And Trump announced directly at the White House today that the U.S. government has launched a government service website called America.gov. In other words, if you want to know government information or anything in the future, you go in there, and AI will help you find it and integrate it. This should be very useful, I think. Because before, if you wanted to find something, you had to go into various departments to find information, which is quite annoying, right? Then he said, he said that we are currently leading by a lot in the field of AI.

This is what I heard when I was listening to him talk to reporters on the scene; it was more than what was said in the article. He said at the time: 'He said regarding this AI matter, there is no third place; it is just us and the CCP currently engaged in this AI R&D. He said there is no such thing as development between us; we don't need to develop together, we just do our own thing.' He said: 'Why should we develop this matter with them? The U.S. is currently leading. If we cooperate with the CCP to develop this AI, it would be equivalent to letting China obtain U.S. technology and secrets; they would immediately get things we know that they don't. We are already leading, and I hope to maintain this situation.' Moreover, Trump also said that there is no such thing as first, second, or third place in AI development, because there is only one winner and one loser.

Look at how he said that; it clearly exposes everything the CCP is planning behind the scenes, wanting to use political correctness to make this AI seem like biological R&D, U.S.-China joint development, and then outsourcing it to the CCP because that would be cheaper. After that, the CCP and you would build this kind of censorship together, and all the people who call the shots and have influence inside would be covered by the CCP, with the CCP planting its own people in. Wow, in less than two years, what you would see is the same way the whole world was silenced about the truth of the pandemic during COVID-19. Trump is not buying that.

So, Trump couldn't have been clearer; he is pointing directly at the fact that I understand you, the CCP, are pushing this behind the scenes. Although you, the CCP, don't admit it on the surface, who can't see through it? And wasn't it just a few days ago that Bill Gates specifically said in the media that AI could lead to the death of a billion people? He is very worried and hopes that it must be regulated by legislation. And he specifically said during an interview on NBC on Sunday that it should be written into law and become a mandatory requirement, not just relying on self-regulation.

Trump has always said that this so-called AI killing all of humanity is just a hoax, much like global warming. When global warming became unsustainable, they just changed the name to climate change, so that whether it gets colder or warmer, they have the final say. Trump said long ago that this is a scam. Then, on Sunday, Bill Gates said it wasn't a scam and that he hoped to meet with Trump, because with his years of experience in the tech industry, he wanted to appeal to Trump. I've noticed that all the tech giants with deep ties to the CCP are basically being exposed, right? Take Bill Gates, for example; he's now worried about AI killing all of humanity or a billion people, but why isn't he worried about COVID-19 coming from a CCP lab, a military lab, killing one or two million Americans? I haven't seen him express any concern about that at all. Bill Gates's collusion with the CCP is truly deep. Now that he's jumped out to stand on the CCP's side, how did Trump handle it? Trump must have met with him or spoken to him. But today, when Trump was interviewed by reporters, a reporter specifically asked about what Bill Gates said, and Trump replied, 'I've talked to him, he doesn't think that way anymore, he completely agrees with my position.' So you see, Trump immediately turned these people around. I'm telling you, people like Bill Gates, including Musk—today Jensen Huang and Musk were all standing by Trump's side when he met with the press, and one after another, they even spoke! Take Dario, that's Dario from Anthropic, right? Didn't Trump say a couple of days ago that Dario wasn't very bright? After this group went to see Trump together, Dario said directly in front of reporters today that President Trump helped alleviate his concerns about Super Intelligence. He said, 'If we get this right, if we work together with the President and everyone here, we can safely win.' In other words, Trump has completely flipped these people. I don't know how Trump convinced them behind the scenes, whether from the perspective of national security or something else. Anyway, today, these people, including Jensen Huang and Musk, were all by Trump's side saying they agree with Trump's view—no need for legislation, we can have self-regulation, and combined with existing capabilities under the leadership of the U.S. government, that's enough. It's exactly what Trump said! Regardless of whether they are truly convinced in their hearts, the reporters who wanted to watch Trump squirm over the AI Super Intelligence issue today have completely failed.

Antonio Zeng once said that Trump mentioned the U.S. SI compared to China's AI because the U.S. SI indeed has super-intelligence nodes, while China's does not. The chips for these core nodes are not entirely from Nvidia; most of these super nodes are made in Japan. It's a pity Satoshi didn't come over; there's no way to verify it, right? Maybe Satoshi could chime in on this Lude Media, right? But before that, we had aligned our talking points with everyone: China wants to distill the capabilities of these super nodes, but they can't. Thank you to Antonio Zeng and Satoshi for the additions.

Anyway, now you will find that the Trump administration's handling of this AI SI legislation was actually a very short process! In the past, for such a big issue with such a huge spectacle, even all these tech giants coming out—even Dario, who is actually quite anti-CCP, I've seen many of his interviews before, and the CCP doesn't like him either. But even Dario leaned toward the outcome the CCP wanted on this issue. I didn't expect that the whole thing would be settled by Trump within about two weeks around Xi's visit to the U.S. I'm looking forward to seeing if more news comes out later so we can see how Trump managed to handle them so impressively.

By the way, take that far-left AOC, a Democratic representative who now openly supports the DSA—how is she trying to stop AI development? How does she want to regulate AI through legislation? Let me show you, Fox reported it specifically: just this Sunday, AOC went on a TV program to talk to others—no, it wasn't a TV program, it was a town hall in a city in New York state hosted by a student activist group, 'Students vs. Billionaires.' She presented a very terrifying picture of AI replacing workers, causing resources and wealth to become increasingly concentrated, allowing the elite and wealthy classes to eliminate jobs and hoard resources, making Americans increasingly dependent on artificial intelligence and turning them into slaves!

Just looking at this, without saying anything else, the way he attended this conference sounds so much like the Cultural Revolution, doesn't it? Students confronting billionaires—that sounds like the feeling of rolling up your sleeves and getting ready to work, getting ready to face off, the feeling of 'smash, grab, and loot.' Then he said that this AI environment must ensure that everyone is out of a job, that all the benefits are kept for themselves, that people become dependent on tech companies, and that cognitive abilities are outsourced to machines. He also said that AI data systems are built on theft because they learned from copyrighted material, including privacy, and so on. He called it the largest intellectual property theft in history. You see these people, when they promote these dark sides of AI, they never call it a conspiracy theory themselves. During the pandemic, we analyzed for everyone with reason and evidence why this COVID-19 virus did not come from nature, was not the result of climate change, and was not the result of animal smuggling; it was the result of you going to find the virus, bringing it back to the lab, developing it in cooperation with the military, and then releasing it. They called that a conspiracy theory. Our Lude Media released the May 14th recording, discussing the CCP's strategy for attacking Taiwan, internal speeches, and exposing the 'Ghost Month' operation to Xi. We talked about the 093417 Yellow Sea nuclear submarine getting tangled in a target chain and everyone dying. They keep saying we are spreading conspiracy theories and that there is no evidence. I want to ask, where is the evidence for what AOC said? Our information is backed by solid evidence, whether it's genetic evidence that national labs can verify, or that 54-minute recording—you are welcome to take it for testing. Is there even one or two seconds of AI generation in there? Is it forged? It's very easy to check and see that it is 100% authentic! And like the nuclear submarine incident, didn't the UK and Taiwan independently confirm it later? You see, this is this group of people. That's why Trump always says the fake media is turning black into white, undermining national security, and is the enemy of the people. It's true—you can't even argue with that. They are forming cliques here. But under these circumstances, Trump settled the matter of AI legislation, and it was immediately suppressed. It's truly impressive, really makes one feel good.

Also, let me show you, right, first let's talk about Republican Congressman Gallagher. Congressman Gallagher actually specifically mentioned this a couple of days ago, because after the Trump-Xi meeting, many people were still paying attention to the AI issue. Actually, Gallagher said it directly: China's mastery of frontier technology and its ambition to seize Taiwan are the greatest threats facing humanity! This is him—because he has now gone to the Hudson Institute, and he is currently the head of Palantir's defense business. It seems he is no longer a congressman, so this article was published in The Wall Street Journal. You see, it's very clear here; what he and Trump are saying is actually the same thing. You can't be tied up in knots while Xi is using this super-intelligent AI to kill you, and then say, 'I want to be politically correct, I want to do this and that.' Exactly, look at what Gallagher said: the greatest threat facing humanity is by no means runaway AI, but AI controlled by the CCP. They will use this disruptive technology to seize Taiwan and subsequently replace the United States as the dominant global hegemon. This was stated very powerfully.

Speaking of this, let me tell you a little bit about the UN General Assembly. Didn't I mention it yesterday? When they met at the UN, the new British Prime Minister Starmer and Trump held talks. This includes the issue of whether to return the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, which we discussed yesterday. What else did they talk about? Do you know? They also talked about artificial intelligence; they touched on this issue as well. According to BBC reports, what did Starmer say at the time? He said that one of the key areas of focus for Starmer's trip to the UN was AI. It's funny, the UK hasn't really developed AI much, but the leader of their far-left Labour Party is quite concerned about it. So when he went to the UN for the meeting, he even met with business leaders, including Apple CEO Tim Cook. Then Starmer told Cook and the others: 'I hope to establish a set of unified global principles and standards that can both fully unleash the full potential of artificial intelligence and prevent risks.' Even the BBC said, 'Hey, this position conflicts with Trump's.' See that? After Starmer arrived here, this was an important task. He hopes to establish—behind him, the far-left, pro-CCP, communism, and the Communist International—see? It's all connected again!

And didn't Trump give a speech at the UN General Assembly back then, explicitly saying that he completely rejects any attempt to build a globalist system to control AI? In that globalization of the past few decades, we've already seen the most terrifying aspect of it during COVID-19. Human lives right there—millions of lives worldwide lost in that globalization process because the Chinese Communist Party infiltrated international organizations and seized the narrative, almost dragging humanity... that was the real near-miss of destroying all of humanity. Definitely more than one billion people have caught COVID. If you factor in repeated infections and vaccine injuries, wow, how many people worldwide lost their lives or suffered from all kinds of long-term sequelae because of COVID, right? And then you have financial losses, social disruptions—look at how the younger generation suffered mental damage, developmental issues, and more due to school closures and lockdowns during that process. There's so much of it. But look at this time when Starmer comes over, and he has to push for global AI regulation. This move is a total sleight of hand: they don't have to develop AI themselves, but they get to call the shots on AI regulation and influence.

He knows how to play the game, but when he met with Trump—right? It's very clear, you see how afterward Trump, including after their meeting, didn't mention at all that, oh, I listened to Starmer talk about this and I felt inspired, or I thought what he said made sense. Trump didn't mention it at all. You say your piece, it goes in one ear and out the other. And look at Trump's whole operation today, right? Starmer came, and what he said made practically no difference from saying nothing. And another thing about Starmer is that during his time at the UN General Assembly, he met this person and that person, including the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. Later, during the bilateral meeting with Trump, the BBC reported that Starmer actually showed up ten minutes late! And von der Leyen even comforted him, saying, oh, this... oh, no, it was this... During his overtime meeting with Trump, he was also about ten minutes late to see von der Leyen. And then von der Leyen very understandingly said, "Oh, well, this sort of thing is understandable." So you can see that whatever Starmer came out to accomplish this time isn't going to happen, right? Look at the Chagos Islands issue; he tried to find a way to hand them over to Mauritius. Trump said the deal is terrible and we won't recognize it. Then look at the AI issue; Trump completely ignored him, didn't even give a reply. And then going to meet von der Leyen—in British etiquette and diplomatic style, punctuality is the most important thing. Yet he ended up being ten minutes late! Oh, this is also quite humiliating, right? Starmer is really quite incompetent. Word has it that the UK has truly tasted the sweetness of speech control.

You have to know, when we talk about COVID, look at the US side—even though in the end, you saw deep state forces deployed, altering the CIA's conclusions, and then Fauci running around everywhere every day putting out fires and suppressing speech, right? And even including within the Biden administration, demands for censorship emerged, so things like third-party fact-checkers... At that time, the Chinese Communist Party was in its element, desperately suppressing us from exposing the truth of the epidemic. The UK, remember? At that time, the UK had a media outlet called ITV. When they first interviewed me in August 2020, that ITV program—what was it called, Woman's something? It was a very popular, widely watched, decades-old legacy women's talk show, right? When they first interviewed me, they said that for that specific episode, featuring twenty women who influenced the world over the past twenty years, I was the very first person they interviewed. That was my first appearance in British media, right? After going public, the response was exceptionally good! It was very short, just over ten minutes, but the response was fantastic, so that program immediately scheduled a second interview with me. But then, right before the second interview—it was only about a week apart—just as it was about to happen, it was suddenly squashed, and the other party didn't even dare to contact me anymore, only saying, "Oh, we can't interview you now, we're going into lockdown," and they didn't dare contact me again.

And didn't the BBC also say at first that they were going to interview me? They contacted my lawyer, saying their global morning show was going to interview the leader, but right before the interview, boom, it was cut off directly. And later there was another media outlet called GB News that interviewed me, right? Aside from those print media outlets like The Sun and the Daily Mail that interviewed me, there was also GB News. GB News was also a very sharp, conservative newly created alternative media outlet. And the founder of GB News was also very influential. Oh, their very first episode interviewed me, and then the second episode interviewed me right after. Uh, the second interview—some audience friends might remember—after interviewing me, they interviewed Jimmy Masefield. But the content of my interview, because I bluntly stated that it was an unrestricted bioweapon intentionally released, later—especially as time went on, the speech censorship in the UK actually dealt a huge blow to GB News, putting immense pressure on them at the time. So it's very likely that—because you can't find this GB News content online anymore, regarding my interview, especially the part where I said it was an unrestricted bioweapon. I checked, and it's highly likely that under internal pressure within the UK, GB News had to hide this content first. It was broadcast at the time because it was a live stream.

So in the UK, actually, if you look at the suppression of freedom of speech, even compared to the US during the same period—when both faced top-down pressure and the infiltration pressure of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)—the pressure in the UK is much, much greater, and its censorship effect is far more powerful, you see? So here, we need to talk about why the UK... we know the systems are very different, but why does the UK, up to now—including people like Michelle Donelan going to the UN General Assembly—still openly talk about regulating and censoring AI? Behind this, there is actually a very strong historical background. The whole historical factor is actually that it can be traced back to the seventeenth century, when a traditional system was established where the government could decide what information could be publicly disseminated. Look, as we go back to 1637, ah, no, 1637, at that time, the UK passed something called the Star Chamber—I don't know how best to translate it, maybe translated as this "new court"—and this Star Chamber, along with the establishment of its licensing system for publishing, ah, used this to control the entire publishing industry in Britain. That means this was called the Star Chamber Decree Concerning Printing of 1637, ah, restricting the printing industry through this decree. If British publishers wanted to get a license back then, the government could restrict your printing equipment. And then, if necessary, it could conduct searches, seize unlicensed publications, ah, and punish illegal publishers. This sounds very familiar, because we know what happened in Hong Kong, right? Back then, everyone saw with their own eyes how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) suppressed freedom of speech in Hong Kong. So the core of establishing such a system back then was that I had to censor you before publication, rather than waiting until after you published something and something happened, and then coming back retroactively to say you violated the law, and so on and so forth. Of course, ah, at that time it mainly dealt with things related to and based on influencing its royal rule, religious order, and political authority. Back then, if you talked about public health or something, nobody cared, right?

Later on? By 1643, just a few, few years later, there was a civil war in the UK. During the civil war, the British Parliament was actually resisting the autocratic power of the king, so logically it was resisting royal power. However, even though the British Parliament and the royal family were fighting each other here, the British Parliament also issued a licensing order for printing, strengthening publishing censorship all over again. Because although, ah, a civil war is a civil war, on the issue of freedom of speech, they similarly felt it necessary to control publications. See that? This is very interesting. That means back in that era, the seventeenth century, Britain didn't care whether you recognized royal power or felt that royal power was too autocratic, ah; if you were striving for reform, everyone still thought it was very necessary to control publications. And furthermore, even if the ones calling the shots were representatives of this Parliament, like members of parliament, or whoever was calling the shots was from the royal family, regardless of who it was, they should possess this right to control information. This matter is very interesting, right? Therefore, for a long time, the UK has actually harbored this kind of internal-to-external constraint and influence on freedom of speech, just like we say that on the soil of China there has never been true freedom, right? So it seems like whenever something happens, no matter which dynasty or what time it is, there is always an idea in everyone's heart that goes: oh, if only there were someone to make decisions on my behalf, relinquishing this power to a higher power controller, right? Accustomedly relying on some authority or something.

Well, of course, you might say that was what it looked like in the seventeenth century, but what about later? Later on, actually, ah, this kept developing and developing, but the UK still kept a very tight grip on this aspect of political speech, ah. Including this, after passing through hundreds of years, down to the twentieth century, didn't broadcasting and television emerge? Like this communications regulator, ah, previously when we talked about the BBC, we told everyone there is Ofcom, right? The communications regulator is the most important regulatory agency in this regard. Similarly, like we said in 2020, the UK specifically had this communications regulator issue guidance stating that, ah, regarding COVID-related content, as long as they deemed it false, or, ah, after they made a judgment, stating that this thing did not conform to the facts, they wouldn't let you talk about it, you understand? So back during COVID, you see, ah, a lot of things came from places like The Lancet and such. And why did Fauci immediately arrange in late January for Tedros and a British public health scientist, ah, to go deal with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) together? There are reasons for all of this. Because in the UK, many things in this regard are easy to manipulate, you know?

Right, so here you mentioned that if the UK now says regarding AI development, "If you don't join our AI regulation and you step in, you'll immediately face global AI legal scrutiny." If this goes on, will the US let you get away with it? So Trump didn't give this person any face at all, right? Of course, when this person speaks now, you can't gag them, but you say the UK—especially this pro-CCP faction—does being pro-CCP equal being anti-US? Right? Do you really think the US won't come back to settle accounts with all of you, these governments, these people, and these forces, one by one when the time comes? Hey, look, yesterday we talked about the UK terrorist attack at the Fairford base, and several people were released on bail in the afternoon. At the time, everyone was asking, why were they released? As it turned out, when we checked the news after finishing the broadcast in the evening, not only were they released on bail, but it was unconditional bail—meaning they were released directly without even posting bail money. Wow! This way of doing things is simply jaw-dropping, right? Ah, I find it hard to understand, and our audience friends should find it hard to understand too. So look at Trump yesterday; if you look at what he said, there were actually a few very important pieces of information. Yesterday, Trump emphasized that I actually know a lot about this matter, saying that we have been observing the whole situation all along. That means they were observing it even before it happened. Moreover, Trump said—although Trump cannot accept these suspects being released on bail—Trump said, "Don't make me be too specific, I know who did it, and I could name the exact person behind this terrorist attack."

And didn't Rubio also add that it was a "foreign actor," meaning an external force? Hey, this gets interesting. Just how specific are Trump and Rubio about this external force? Ah, look, Trump also said, "I won't tell you, but if I wanted to, I could get very specific," right? Rubio also—yesterday on Fox News with Sean Hannity, the date here is probably written wrong, it's not September 2—Sean Hannity specifically asked him: "What do you think about the bail? Right?" Rubio said: "I have to be very careful with my words and cannot go into detail." Well, of course, regarding this bail issue, right, Rubio surely also feels it is very hard to accept. But speaking in his capacity as, first, a diplomat, and second, a national security advisor, he tries not to reveal too much intelligence when he talks. Perhaps not under this premise, when he talks about these matters, he says that specific details are inconvenient to discuss much. But clearly, there are external forces. Then he thanked the UK for its cooperation, saying that regarding the bail issue, many people feel uneasy, and we are closely coordinating—meaning the US doesn't want them released on bail either, right? Applying pressure on the UK. And then he also said, well, the others are also very cooperative. Hey, the key part is what he said later: he said we are dealing with some dangerous elements in the world, such as Iran as an example, which has openly threatened to attack US interests worldwide, and we are highly vigilant about this. Hey, you see, let's take this part and say a bit more about this attempted terrorist attack that happened over in the UK.

He has already, Rubio clearly stated, and repeatedly said that a foreign actor is involved, rather than just saying foreign forces are involved. Everyone also says, for instance, Israel directly stated that Iran has long since announced that the U.S. military strikes on their bases, military bases, are all targets they intend to attack. Then everyone's first reaction is also, well, it must be Iran, right? And those people also look like they are Muslims or something. But look at Rubio here, this foreign actor of his is clearly, at least not entirely referring to Iran, because if he were saying, for example, taking Iran as an example, Trump also said that he understands everything, right? And Rubio definitely has access to much deeper intelligence on this matter. If he really wanted to say this external force is Iran, then actually no one would question it. To be honest, it is only when you say this matter is not Iran that people will question it, or say, well, besides Iran, are there other countries? Then people might ask, right? Especially the American audience, they might say, well, what evidence do you have that it is Iran? But it is a settled matter. However, look, he says foreign actor, but we say, for example, Iran is going to attack us, this matter is very serious. At least I tell you, it feels like Iran is not a major player in this. So here we need to know, who is the one behind it feeling guilty? And what does foreign actor represent here? It should be, because it is an air force base on British soil. If it is some British forces, we said, there must be a mole in here, right? But I also said it does not go as far as saying the entire British government from top to bottom, because in that Whitehall there are both parties, and there are national security people and so on, right? Even if the royal family has been infiltrated, as long as it is not the King himself wanting to destroy the entire royal family, then it cannot be that all royal family members are involved or something, that is not how it works, right? You can only say Britain has been infiltrated, and even some people have been bypassed, or misled or something. But Britain, at least you say if there are people inside Britain cooperating, for example, the Communist International, that is not called a foreign actor. So here, this foreign actor, we say who else could it be? Russia now, it would not do this, and if it were Russia, with Russia now almost dying in Iran, and the CCP kneeling like that, running to fund some people to let them attack American bomber bases, are they crazy? Putin would only do this now. Right? So this matter, I tell you, looking through what they said, plus what we showed you yesterday, right? Trump on one hand saying, this whole terrorist attack, we are very clear about who is behind it, I can even tell you specifically who it is, I just won't. On the other hand, he releases a photo of that Granite tarmac and the west interface, ah, you say in this, let's just say.

Besides the Xi-CCP, who else has such great ability, both to let terrorists secretly prepare so many terrorist attack materials, and to be able to act on British soil without being caught long in advance? And then, surprisingly, they were able to get these people out directly at such an extremely fast speed.

And, hey, here, although it cannot be called obstructing, it is the cooperation of the investigation between the UK and the US, but at least the stumbling block is placed there for you, right? So this matter is very interesting. Hey, you combine it with Trump's Granite meme and look at it repeatedly. Only those like the World News, those dog-headed ones, would say, oh, the US is not fully prepared. When the Xi-Trump meeting happened, oh, many things were not expected, he thought of them, and he thought of everything, it is really twelve points out of ten, that is absolutely not a loss. Okay, this terrorist attack matter will definitely have a lot of news in the future, but we, let's take a look now.

There is one thing that is very interesting, which is the AI matter we just mentioned, what is going on with this? Yes, speaking of this AI censorship matter, the US has not joined forces with the CCP, but a few days ago, such a piece of news came out, saying that during the UN General Assembly, this is the original news from the Washington Post, saying that the US and Russia rarely joined forces to delete the global AI weapon human censorship defense line.

What is going on? This matter is interesting! Look, how did the Washington Post report this? It said it was an exclusive report, saying that originally, there was an international negotiation at the UN concerning lethal autonomous weapon norms. It said earlier this month, in Geneva, Switzerland, it said, what he said is not during the UN General Assembly, he is talking about the matter when they met in Geneva earlier this month. Said this is.

When they met earlier this month, hundreds of diplomats tried to promote the world's first draft of an international agreement on the use of lethal autonomous weapons, that is, in this, it is equivalent to whether your AI can autonomously control the launch of some weapons, or something to carry out counterattacks, strikes, and establish some international law to control you.

However, diplomatic documents and informed sources reveal that in the final stages, representatives from the U.S. and Russia took the rare step of joining forces to revise the draft, collectively deleting multiple safety regulations, including the requirement for human review of targets before launching an attack. It is said that this occurred during the closed-door negotiations on the final day of the talks. In the final fifteen hours of intensive consultation, U.S. and Russian diplomats worked together to significantly revise the text, deleting one by one the various safeguards that other countries had originally designed to constrain lethal autonomous weapons.

Previously, some of these clauses stated that AI weapon systems must operate in a predictable and reliable manner, and also that ethical considerations must be incorporated, along with the requirement for human review. In these closed-door meetings, both the U.S. and Russia had ten legal experts each—nearly double the number of other delegations—so the speed of the revisions left some delegations unable to keep up. It was described as being "diced to death," effectively causing the bill to be aborted, right? It was all carved away.

Then, The Washington Post reported that the U.S. Department of Defense—the War Department—has accelerated the integration of AI into battlefield strategies and applied it to actual combat. It said that within 24 hours of the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran war, Anthropic's chatbot identified nearly a thousand targets, and Israel's military operations in Gaza are similarly highly dependent on AI systems. Then it said, look, some human rights organizations have spoken out, and others have opposed it, right? Saying that there must be some control, regulation, and international law. But Trump expressed his rejection of any globalist agenda.

Now, in Geneva, because there is no way to continue with the old draft, it is said that they will discuss whether to pursue legal binding force for AI in November. Do you see it now? Now that this has been put out, do you understand? To put it bluntly, regarding the negotiations they held in Geneva, if the U.S. and Russia hadn't joined forces to delete these clauses and cause it to abort, wouldn't that be equivalent to...?

For so many years, the U.S. military has been unable to be fully unleashed under the CCP's unrestricted warfare, while the CCP can use unrestricted warfare to bypass you, right? Oh, once international law is involved, the more civilized countries like the U.S. and the West are, the more they will eventually rely on and follow the framework of international law, saying "you can't do this" or "you can't do that." With AI, in a war, you clearly need to strike first. If you add a human review, who will review it, when will they review it, and how long will it take to react after the review? Damn it, if you add that clause, do you still need to engage in combat with people in a war? You would have been blown to bits by others long ago, right? For example, if the CCP one day goes crazy and wants to launch a nuclear missile.

After the U.S. detects it, it must directly detect it at a certain standard and strike first to wipe out the Xi-CCP side! Oh, and it's still waiting to detect it, or even waiting for the opponent's missile to be launched and already approaching your airspace, while over here they are rushing to hold a meeting, discussing, "We must follow international law," and "We must have final human review." Wow, before you even start the meeting, you've already been blown to ashes, right? So here, you see, the U.S.-Russia cooperation on this matter actually represents what? It represents two nuclear-armed powers.

They know full well that this matter involves: what if one day a madman wants to destroy all of humanity? Should we strike first? Even if, at that moment, he has already neutralized the leaders of the U.S. and Russia, they must still make a response that exceeds the control of these controllers and strike first to eliminate that madman.

In the most extreme cases, this is absolutely the way it is. So you see, the key point here is interesting. These diplomats, delegations, and so on—including the UK, someone must have participated. Why did Burnham even run to the U.S. specifically to emphasize this? But the problem is, once the U.S. and Russia show their strength, don't talk about not being able to handle it when it comes to military power! Just by drafting a legal proposal, look, as long as the U.S. and Russian delegations join forces to oppose it, the remaining diplomats and representatives are completely ineffective, right? Oh.

No wonder they all want to push these bills. Isn't it because they know who is stronger than you, so you have to tie their hands and feet, and then let a bunch of mediocre people and fools—of course, we can't say everyone inside is a mediocre fool, but honestly, the UN, right? How corrupt has it been made by the CCP? At the very least, these people either don't have that string in their brains and are purely naively cute.

Or they are both evil and cowardly, right? Just like when they were lying through their teeth during the COVID-19 pandemic; isn't that exactly what the WHO at the UN did? Right? So here, they don't do any research, they don't speak up about the origins of COVID-19, and weapons that kill all of humanity, like COVID-19—no one has any real resistance to it, right? The CCP is still stepping up the development of various variants that escape the immune system and your existing immunity, and no one says a word. Now that AI has come out, they are all coming out.

The U.S. has already stated it. The meaning behind Trump's words on AI is actually very clear: I am developing this AI, and I am going to use it to crush the CCP. I will make the gap between the CCP and me so wide that you can't even catch up. There are only winners and losers, and since you are an existential threat to me, you are the loser, and I will crush you. Isn't that only natural? Now, at the United Nations, people like those from the UK are saying, 'Oh, we must use laws to wrap this up, we can't do it this way.'

This kind of hypocrisy is exactly why Trump doesn't buy your act, right? That's exactly right. This Antonio says, 'Isn't this draft meant to counter the core capabilities of the CCP?' Who proposed this bill? Yes, yes, yes, that is the meaning, right? And the CCP is just a part of America's power calculation. Who proposed this bill? Anyway, regardless of who proposed it, you can see now that Russia and the U.S. have joined forces to delete it, so Russia is also using various ways to pledge its loyalty to the U.S. in this matter, right? So why does the U.S. want to align with Russia? On one hand, it suppresses Russia, and on the other, it aligns with it, because the world has truly reached a critical moment of survival!

You must use this method to suppress this group—whether they are globalists or the far-left, or whoever the CCP has managed to control. Xi sits there thinking about how happy he is to have raised so many zombies and ghouls, and you have to suppress those who work for him. And today we say, of course, Russia should also be suppressed if it needs to be, right? If you don't suppress it, it will come back and bite you whenever it has the chance. There is a major event today; have you seen this video? Everyone can go online and watch many videos of the raging fire, including this one. Look at this.

See? After it crashed, it was very bright. The entire night sky—look here, this is the photo after the plane crash, including the scene where only the tail fin was left burning. Through this tail fin, it was identified as a Tu-95. The Russian Ministry of Defense has already confirmed that a Tu-95 strategic bomber crashed in a region called Amur during a training mission. There were seven people on board, six of whom died. It is said that among these seven, four were crew members, and one person is in critical condition but still alive and has been sent to the hospital for emergency treatment.

Russia stated that because the Tu-95 can carry nuclear warheads, they have already indicated that this Tu-95 was not carrying any weapons. At the same time, the Russian Aerospace Forces have dispatched a committee to investigate the cause of the crash. As everyone knows, the Tu-95 is one of Russia's major weapons of mass destruction, and it is also the main force for launching long-range missiles at Ukraine, right? Now, there is some news online saying that it is currently known that shortly after this bomber took off from that base, three of its four engines malfunctioned.

This detail is very interesting! I don't know how this news was confirmed. Perhaps the Russian military has already conducted a preliminary investigation. Because this incident happened eight or nine hours ago, about half a day. Now, the media in Ukraine is discussing whether it is possible that Ukraine carried out some kind of sabotage against it? Anyway, there is no official admission from Ukraine at the moment. Analysts believe that the timing of this crash is unusual.

Russia says it was a routine training mission, but analysts on the Ukrainian side do not quite accept this, saying that in fact, this bomber was likely using the name of training, but was actually redeploying so that it could play a role in the next round of large-scale long-range missile attacks on Ukraine. That sounds quite consistent with the tactics in this war.

In addition, there is a self-media channel allegedly related to the Main Directorate of Intelligence of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine, or some kind of channel, that also paid special attention to the engine failure. Because look, after taking off, three out of four engines had problems, which makes one wonder: is this a problem with the fuel system itself, or was there deliberate, targeted sabotage that caused such a major problem, right? Anyway, there is no evidence, including from Russia, that this was done by Ukraine; no one is saying that.

And then, as for those who are worried about whether there were any cruise missiles, Russia does not admit it, and it has not been confirmed so far; it is all speculation. In addition, there is some news that back in 2015, there was actually a Tu-95 that took off from the same airbase while on a mission, and it also experienced a failure where three out of four engines malfunctioned. In that crash, there were only two people on board, and both were killed.

So this matter is worth discussing. Although the content we know now is very limited, right? First of all, look, Russia's Tu-95, although it is just one crash, is a real and significant loss, and more importantly, it is a clear blow to Russia's image as a major military power, right?

The Tu-95 is now a case of 'one less every time one is lost,' because it has basically ceased production. You can't just simply replace one, you understand? The greatest value of the Tu-95 lies in its ability to carry and launch cruise missiles from a long distance. During the Russia-Ukraine war, it launched weapons from far outside Ukraine's air defense zones; although these aircraft are quite old, they have indeed provided operational value throughout the conflict. However, there hasn't been a new Tu-95 produced in at least thirty years. Russia has been quite financially strapped since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

So, if you talk about the Tu-95, maintenance during its service life is doable. But if you say, 'I want to upgrade it, modernize it, make it high-tech, or produce an improved version, or replenish my stock with a few new ones,' that is basically impossible. They can expand the army and conscript people, but there are no new Tu-95s coming out. So, if this aircraft was secretly deployed elsewhere to be used in a future attack on Ukraine, and it suddenly crashed, one must consider whether it was a coincidence or if, in fact, there are no such coincidences—that every move Russia makes is being monitored by Ukraine, to the point where even a covert maneuver to reposition a Tu-95 is known, and they are able to strike with such precision that it crashes, leaving you with no leads when you try to assign blame. Think about it: four engines, three fail, and the whole plane crashes. There was a similar case in 2015.

But while you could argue that the 2015 case shows that the Tu-95 might have engine issues—three out of four failing—and that having a precedent makes it seem less suspicious, look at it from another angle: is it really such a coincidence? To put it bluntly, the Type 59 modified tanks that the CCP sold to Bangladesh could have their barrels explode in the same way two years apart, but at least the complexity of a tank barrel exploding is far less than three out of four engines on a Tu-95 failing simultaneously, causing the entire aircraft to be a total loss beyond repair. So, is it possible that because you had a previous incident where three engines failed, and assuming that one was natural, some force specifically engineered this one to mimic that scenario, so that when you investigate the cause, you are led to look for natural explanations? Think about whether that makes sense.

Think about SARS. At the time, it was said to have come from a seafood market, transmitted by civet cats, implying a natural source caused by humans eating animals. When COVID-19 broke out, the CCP specifically arranged for the Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market to play the role of the civet cat, repeating the previous narrative. If everyone accepted it, and if we didn't have this program, would the whole world have just paid the price? Naturally. But in reality, it was intentional, to prevent you from seeing the non-natural factors involved. So this is very interesting. By the way, speaking of three out of four engines failing, these engines are systems that were used for a long time in the Soviet era and are very mature, right? Soviet engines, including those in Russia now—they have been fighting for so long, they shouldn't be that rotten, should they?

So this is worth studying. What mysterious location caused Russia to... think about it: if Russia wanted to get one last hit in before a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire, thinking, 'We'll secretly deploy the Tu-95 there, and when Ukraine is perhaps in three-party negotiations—US-Russia-Ukraine talks—we'll strike them and force them to swallow their pride and continue negotiating a ceasefire,' hoping to gain something. But then the Tu-95 fails before it can even start its mission. Do you think Russia would dare to try that again easily? Although they still have some Tu-95s and Tu-160s, every one lost is one less, right?

And what's even more terrifying is that if others can know your secret deployment arrangements in advance and can design such a strike with precision, that deterrent is no less significant than the time when Putin almost had his plane shot down by a Ukrainian drone after visiting the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. So, didn't I say? You must keep a tight lid on Russia at all times; otherwise, when you engage with them, they will bite you whenever they have the chance. You can't handle that, right?

So, by the way, the Tu-95 is one of the most powerful assets in the Russian system, because Russia's large-scale nuclear bombing operational platform mainly consists of the Tu-95 and the Tu-160. The Tu-95 is analogous to the American B-52; both are long-range heavy strategic missile bombers. However, the Tu-95 only has four turboprop engines, while the B-52 is much more advanced. The B-52 has eight turbofan jet engines. Of course, neither the B-52 nor the Tu-95 is stealthy. So, if you want to compare them, you can put them together. But you certainly cannot say that the capabilities of the Tu-95 and the American B-52 are on par; that is impossible, you understand?

Saying that the US is not producing B-52s anymore, actually the last B-52 in the US was built in the early 1960s, and they stopped production back then because later they produced things like the B-1 and B-2, and various other types, so they stopped making that one. And now for Russia, the Tu-95 has also been out of production for more than 30 years, and then that Russian Tu-160 can be compared to the B-1, but the Tu-160 is also... if they want to build a new one, it would take a very long time, and its replenishment speed is also very limited. Well, because the Tu-160 can fly at supersonic speeds, now if they are going to build this kind of bomber, Russia feels that making a Tu-160 would definitely have a better effect, and they don't waste effort on the production line of the Tu-95.

In addition, we have to say this, look, when Putin met with Trump in Alaska back then, didn't Trump arrange for that B-2 to fly right over his head? Of course, Putin's expression wasn't as wooden and blank, as unable to react, as Xi's was at the airport, right? Why did they suddenly use a B-2 to give Russia a surprise back then, but when it flew over Xi, the surprise given was a B-1B? Actually, this is because Russia has that Tu-160, no matter what you say, there is still a gap in actual combat effectiveness. But their Tu-160 at least benchmarks the B-1B, so if Trump had flown a B-1B over at that time, the deterrence against Putin wouldn't have been that big, and right after the Volga battle just ended not long ago, only about two months prior, using a B-2 to scare Putin had the effect of "I have what you don't, you kid must figure out who is stronger." But you see, when they arranged it for Xi, Xi even felt like, oh, look, Trump arranged the B-2 for me at the White House, specifically at the welcome ceremony for me. Actually, have you figured out the other trick behind this? That is, Trump doesn't even need to use a B-2 to scare you, because your the Chinese Communist Party doesn't even have anything comparable to the B-1B, it's like using a cleaver to kill a chicken, that's the feeling.

That is, but Trump is very good at playing games, making Xi feel that he received the highest courtesy, even better than Putin. Putin didn't receive the treatment of this B-1B flying halfway past the White House entrance, so when Xi came over, he felt like, humph, I am better than Putin, I have face. Then when he stood there at the airport, what flew overhead was a B-1B, telling you that a B-1B is enough to deal with you, you don't even have the strength of this B-1B, so how can Xi even have the nerve to let people bring it out and brag over and over again on this trip? It is truly disgraceful! If you ask me, whether it is Xi or the princess of the Xi family who cares so much about online evaluations, you should cut off the food supply of these bootlickers who now want to curry favor with you to whitewash the Trump-Xi summit one by one, and interrogate the ones who need interrogation. Not a single one of these guys is loyal to you. To be able to write that kind of utter nonsense, they first have to watch our show and figure out all the ways Trump laid these traps for Xi? Xi walked into them one by one accurately and ruthlessly, and then they still have to weigh among them which ones are touchable and which ones are untouchable sensitive zones, because the tiger's backside cannot be touched.

Therefore, in choosing the points they think can be argued about more easily, can be spun with the brush of Spring and Autumn Annals more easily, and can be used to flatter you more easily, they give them to you. Oh, look at this, in your world of misery, oh, the arrangements made by the US are not adequate enough, highlighting the diplomatic failure of the Trump administration. I'm telling you, once this kind of nonsense comes out, you have to understand that they first have to thoroughly digest all the points we explained, and then go to hoodwink you, hoodwink you for your trust, hoodwink you for your money, and hoodwink you for your resources. You say, what state is your CCP in now? You still rely on these things? Just like Hu Xijin, who bragged earlier that Trump welcoming Xi Jinping was because he knelt to Trump and how awesome Xi Jinping is, and then turned around to catch spies, saying there are American or foreign forces trying to make contact everywhere, and that old Hu has sharp eyes and won't be fooled by a single one. These people first see clearly that they think they are human masterminds, not only do they think they are playing ordinary masses, but they even think they have you dictators wrapped around their little fingers. Therefore, even if you collapse, they can immediately change their skins and continue to loudly sing all kinds of positive energy as long as whoever is in power, following them to sing it. So, I'm saying, really, hurry up and replace all these people, you know?

Look at this, the US has done so many things, if Xi can't figure it out, then the one who ends up in bad luck is him, right? You can't possibly say that Hu Xijin also gets the B-1B treatment, right? He doesn't even measure up to that. Let me tell you the truth, he is the kind of guy you wouldn't even know where to bury in a pile of rubble, right? So you see, speaking of this, slightly remembering that there is a difference between the B-1B and B-2 flying over Putin's and Xi Jinping's heads. Then we say, why is it said that the Chinese Communist Party doesn't have anything like the B-1B? Because not to mention that, even the Tu-95 wasn't sold to outsiders after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, let alone during the Soviet era; there was never any talk of making an upgraded version for you and selling it to you. People consider this their ultimate strategic weapon and won't give it to you. The closest thing the CCP has to the Tu-95 is the H-6.

And then, this H-6 can only be said to be a similar replica, the closest one, because it is neither a replica of the Tu-95, nor a replica of the Tu-160, let alone that. It is equivalent to a replica of the Tu-16. You see, this Tu-95 has no export version, so back then, after the dissolution, some were left in Kazakhstan, some were left in Ukraine's air force bases at the time, and later some were returned to Russia because Ukraine, for example, used to use these missiles and previous strategic bombers to pay off some natural gas debts and so on, so the CCP probably didn't get any Tu-95s, which is why it could only end up replicating such an H-6, right? But isn't this currently the most powerful bomber they have in terms of bombers, what they brag about is the H-6, the H-6K, which can launch long-range missiles outside the air defense zone; or the aerial refueling one, which can carry air-launched ballistic missiles, the so-called Chinese air nuclear force, and one of the core tasks undertaken by this is the H-6N, right?

Just like the comparison between the H-6 and the Tu-95, it is actually quite far-fetched. Otherwise, why did Russia accidentally leak some materials some time ago, letting everyone see that if the CCP wants to seize Taiwan, it still has to sign a secret agreement with Russia and learn from them how to parachute down from the air? Look at this, just like that Tu-95, the Tu-95 that crashed down today, it belongs to this kind of intercontinental heavy strategic bomber. And although the H-6 can reach a bit higher, the H-6 is a relatively small medium-to-long-range platform. You can't say that because it has aerial refueling and long-range missiles, it is therefore equivalent to matching the Tu-95? No, it still falls short a bit, understand? So the CCP simply hasn't obtained the core things of the Tu-95 and the Tu-160 in this regard. Now, what the CCP admits to is the H-6 series, including the K, N, and J, and this is what they brag about. Then what else is there? That is the H-20 they are bragging about now, and this H-20 is quite interesting. First of all, we can say that compared to the US side, the B-1 and B-2 have a generation-spanning gap with it. The CCP now boasts that although my H-6 is no good, I have an H-20, so this H-20... because you have the B-1, B-2, and B-52, right? But the B-52 is not stealthy, right? The B-1 and B-2—B-2 is definitely stealthy, right? And the B-1 is supersonic, which Xi even saw with his own eyes. Therefore, the CCP boasts that it will have an H-20, claiming that the H-20 is a project benchmarked against stealth long-range bombers. Once this thing is built, how awesome it will be, how awesome it will be.

The problem is that the H-20 has been hyped for many years; it should have been hyped since 2016, and up until now, it has completely failed to debut. Although some media outlets have mistaken some satellite images for the H-20, in reality, official US sources, including military reports, do not believe the H-20 has debuted at all. I will show you later; I went to check how the US military analyzes the H-20 and why it hasn't debuted yet—it's simply another round of massive humiliation of China! As for these things, if you didn't watch our program, you wouldn't even think of them, nor would you know that such things exist. Hey, we dig them all out for you, truly. This isn't about humiliating China or humiliating the CCP; it's just that the things you yourselves do are not fit to be seen in public, and anyone with a slightly sharper eye can tell: "Heh, punk, and you want to fight me with this kind of strength?" Just like Xi returning home all dejected from the US, the CCP, for some unfathomable reason, has to go brag over there again that it also has an H-20. So this observer set up a channel called something like Dayiwang, an account saying that regarding this H-20, the US says China's H-20 project is progressing slowly and should jointly develop it with Russia, but the CCP's stance is that we don't need it at all! We just need a little bit of assistance, that's all.

It says here that a certain US website published an article stating that China's H-20 stealth bomber seems to be stalling, and Russia's similar one, called PAK DA, is also in trouble, so Americans analyzed why the two of them don't just join forces? Look at what you're saying: I have no money in my pocket, and you, our viewers—for example, Joe Sfeet, you have no money in your pocket either—if the two of us combine what's in our pockets, say I have 5 yuan and you have 10 yuan, does that mean the two of us joining forces can go eat at a Michelin restaurant? So how can this thing be something where you just join forces and it works? You first need to have this foundation, and be able to complement each other, before you join forces, right? Isn't that the meaning? So this obvious statement means that the US knows very well; writing this headline is simply humiliating you!

You say why Russia's bombers are in trouble? Look at this Tu-95, all four of its engines can break down at once. Well, indeed, it's very hard for them to develop anything more advanced or stealthy anymore. And you say why the CCP's project is stalling? Can the CCP's engines be relied upon? How did that Long March 7 rocket blow up? Why is it that after it blew up, Chang'e 7 can't be launched this year? Hey, speaking of this, doesn't everyone feel that, just like what I told you yesterday about China and Russia joining forces to conduct a lunar landing and a lunar strategic plan, fooling a dozen countries into joining them to try and rival the United States, what was the result?

The last time Russia successfully launched a lunar probe was over forty years ago—no, that's not right, it's actually been fifty years. After that launch, they waited forty-seven years until 2023 to launch another lunar probe, which failed to enter orbit and crashed. Then there is the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which was also preparing, right? They prepared until 2024 and launched Chang'e 6, which was reportedly successful, though we wouldn't know for sure. And then this year, they were full of confidence to launch Chang'e 7, but what happened?

Isn't it because it uses roughly the same engine as the Long March 7A? And then it was said that this engine suddenly failed to pass the test on the 7A, turning into fireworks in front of everyone, right? So, for Chang'e 7 this year, they said, "Oh, we can't launch it, weather reasons, this reason, that reason." Is that what it means? So you see, I feel that the development of these two stealth nuclear bombers, and their joint development, shares a striking similarity with this lunar business. Come to think of it.

Think about it, that mature rocket engine of the CCP, in the Long March 7A, suddenly exploded. Doesn't it feel a lot like the Tu-95, which also has a very mature bomber engine, where suddenly three out of four engines exploded? Isn't that the feeling? Hey, they say there are no coincidences in diplomacy, so why are there so many coincidences on the battlefield? Well, we don't know, right? We just feel so puzzled, so puzzled! And then look, the CCP is still putting out propaganda, looking down on Russia's speed in developing bombers. Oh, is that necessary? Let's put it this way: it's not necessary at all. I think if you're already talking big, you should stick to it until the end, right? You said you were going to develop it for ten years, and to this day, not a single hair has come out! It's all concept art. I can draw that concept art too; I can even draw concept art of me exploring outer space after leaving the galaxy, believe it or not? The problem is, if I jump, I can't even jump half a meter. So the CCP says, "We don't need to develop a joint bomber with Russia at all." And what did they say afterwards? They said, "Our joint research and development haven't been very beautiful, and the history hasn't been great." They say, especially after the Cold War, the joint R&D projects the two countries tried to implement didn't go well. Hey, why didn't they go well? We don't even need to read their long-winded explanations, right? Talking about heavy helicopters, or wide-body passenger aircraft, none of them worked. To put it bluntly, the CCP thinks Russia has the technology, and Russia thinks the CCP can get new hardware and software, new things that Russia can't access due to sanctions. It's just two parties eyeing what's in each other's pockets, and then bragging to each other. Russia is good at bragging too, right? As a result, they fooled each other, and when they teamed up, they realized—it's like Joy-Ann Reid laughing, right? "Joy-Ann, if we team up, how are we going to eat at a Michelin-starred restaurant? You can't even afford a toothpick, right?" The restaurant's toothpicks are more expensive than that. But if I fool you into thinking I have a 50 million check in my pocket, and you fool me into thinking you have a big diamond in your pocket that can be auctioned for 300 million, then when we team up to go to a Michelin restaurant, we really dare to walk in, right? It's just that getting beaten up when the bill comes is another matter, isn't it? So you see, this cooperation between the CCP and Russia is like two poor people going to eat at a Michelin restaurant, only to find out they were fooling each other, neither can pull out any money, and after being beaten up and thrown out, they have a sudden realization: "This result is never beautiful when we team up," right? So you see, when it comes to developing the H-20, they finally start saying, "Our meaning is, this is a national strategic asset, we won't listen to your nonsense in this regard anymore," right? So, this national strategic asset of ours does not rely on you, Russia, not at all.

Well, you bragged like that, and I thought you really didn't rely on them at all! If you don't rely on them, didn't you still fail to develop it? And then you say, "Currently, our aviation industry has completely broken away from the shadow of the Soviet Union, and the old Russian standards are completely unsuitable." You've bragged so much, no wonder you have to steal the cockpit canopy of the F-35, no wonder you try every possible way, like spending 100 million, hoping to steal Taiwan's F-16. Well, he's stepping on Russia here, and I'm just saying, this love-hate relationship between the CCP and Russia! It would be a miracle if Russia didn't keep a little black book.

Well, he bragged and bragged like that, bragging this way and that. I thought, how confident could he possibly be in the end? It turns out after all that bragging, I'll just skip you straight to the end, because everything before this is just empty armchair strategizing. Look at this, it's all just PowerPoint concept art, right? So no wonder people say Yangyang went home to show off, that going to military college and learning how to make PowerPoints got the Xi family so excited, feeling like an unprecedented genius had finally emerged in the family, and that they could finally fix their family's low-IQ gene pool. Well, that's true, because Xi is used to looking at PowerPoints, right? Everyone who goes to him asking for money relies on PowerPoints. Now that his own son, right, can make PowerPoints, in Xi's eyes that's no different from the stuff on paper instantly coming to life, right? So look at this part here, written right up to the end, talking about how we are particularly looking forward to the H-20, and the J-36, right, both of these are just talk-on-paper gimmicks. Xinhua News Agency comes out and brags about them every few days, see that? In the end, right at the conclusion, it says, for us, cooperation with Russia is either limited to purchasing some product samples from Russia for reference and research, or for some subsystems and components where we provide design consultation to Russia, cash on delivery. After the consultation, we go back to building our own, assembling our own complete machines—that is what is most suitable.

Wait, no, you've already spent all that time bragging beforehand, claiming cooperation failed or didn't work out, and then demanding absolute foolproof success for these pillar heavy weapons of a great power, boasting that you've spent so long completely shaking off Russia's shadow—so how come the conclusion still ends up relying on buying samples, buying parts, and buying systems for consultation? Hey, have you been weaned off your mother's milk yet or not? Oh, what a thing to say, and besides, which country calls assembling something a pillar heavy weapon of a great power? What does assembling even look like to us? Back when computers were relatively expensive, when we were in college, around the 2000s, students would go to the computer market, unwilling to buy a complete brand-name computer, right? You'd learn a bit of computer knowledge on your own, go there, haggle at the computer market, buy a few second-hand parts, mix in a few new ones, and then scrounge together someone else's old machine, take it apart and piece it back together—that's called assembling a computer. Those with money would assemble a prettier one, while those without money would scrape together second-hand parts so they could still play games and surf the net.

Wait, the CCP has been bragging for so long about how the H-20 is a pillar heavy weapon of a great power, completely foolproof. And then what? They're going to assemble their own complete machines? How exactly are they assembling this complete machine? I'd like to ask, since you're already at the level of the J-what-was-it, the H-20 and J-36, and you still need to assemble things? Then your other stuff—do you still expect people to think your military might is that high? No wonder Trump said all those Chinese weapons tested in Venezuela and Iran had massive discrepancies! The gap is certainly big enough, right? And it's not just a big enough gap; it's like playing house compared to high-end cookware in a Michelin-starred chef's kitchen! At least that's the difference! I really have to hand it to these people. That's why I say they are playing dumb while knowing the truth, writing these lousy articles here to fool those higher-ups who hold office without doing their jobs—those leaders with bad brains! So these guys, you tell me, and Observer Network actually published this article, which should have just been published yesterday if I remember correctly—let me check, I looked it up yesterday and it was published on September 28th, if you don't believe me go check it out, right! So for this kind of stuff, honestly, whether it's dog heads or rat heads, take them all, chop off their necks, and throw them aside; it's completely deserved!

Well, someone asked why I don't make videos in English. I do make English videos! Don't I do an English show every week? Audio, previously there were videos too; it's just that maybe some of our audience friends aren't very familiar with it, right? Because you probably don't look at English-language news, my English show The Voice of Doctor Yan has already made hundreds of episodes, once a week, right? And broadcast twice a week, you can listen to it on many apps, like Spotify, Pandora, Apple Podcasts, and it even gets ratings. Some CCP agents would even go on there to give me one star out of five and then rant and rave in the comments, right? Meaning there are some 50-centers keeping an eye on my shows, so you don't need to worry about that. On the English-speaking world side, that's how we do it. But you can't expect me to put out one English episode in the morning and one Chinese episode in the evening every day! After all, I'm a human being, not a machine, right? Besides, we have the Nuomituan and so many of our little partners translating things, including making summaries. In fact, if you go look, for example, if you go on Twitter right now, many people on Twitter post tweets in Arabic, Persian, Russian, or French—don't you notice that when you look at them, they seem just like English? Because those, like the Hebrew tweets posted by Netanyahu and others, can be automatically translated into the English interface if Twitter determines you are not a speaker of those languages. Therefore, a lot of our Chinese content will naturally be presented with an English translation in front of English readers. Although Twitter's translation isn't one hundred percent accurate, at this day and age, AI is just the flick of a finger away, right? So our dissemination in the English-speaking world is definitely happening; there's no need to worry.

Ah, speaking of this, I need to elaborate a bit more. You see, back in late October 2025, there was an American magazine here—a specialized, professional analytical magazine for the military—that published an article stating that China's H-20 stealth bomber had sent a message to the US Air Force. What kind of message? Right off the bat, it mentioned that although the H-20 was publicized by China as early as 2016, it remains shrouded in mystery to this day. US intelligence assessments suggest it won't make its debut until at least the 2030s. Although Chinese officials claim it will debut soon, there is currently no confirmed prototype—not even a prototype exists yet. Analysts are reportedly skeptical. So, wasn't the title about sending a message? That message is that US intelligence officials indicate China is facing severe engineering design challenges, and the H-20 may fall far short of the level of comparable US platforms! And the US side even matched this with a picture of a B-21 bomber for you to see! Look at that bomber under the US flag; oh, how cool that styling is! But you, the CCP, don't have one. Including how sometimes online reports say satellite imagery shows the H-20 parked at a certain base, captured by satellites? But intelligence analysis suggests that should just be a large drone, made to look like a stealth drone. In reality, the H-20 doesn't even have a prototype photo. Moreover, before this, I saw some CCP propaganda claiming, "Oh, the US media is hyping up the leak of our H-20 photos, talking nonsense; that's not our H-20 at all!" The US media that can be fooled are not professional military intelligence analysts, or they are just doing public opinion work, or even spreading fake news. Late last October, it was said that China wouldn't be surprised just because photos of those machines—seemingly the H-20 parked at a certain base—were leaked and photographed by you. It said China had planned in advance for you to see these photos. For instance, last May, at the Malan Base, a highly classified facility was photographed with a huge flying-wing aircraft parked right outside. At the time, some online analyses said, "Oh, is this the H-20 being photographed?" Absolutely not. Another professional military analysis magazine, TMZ, said that this was definitely deliberately orchestrated by the Chinese side to make you mistakenly think it's the H-20, when it's actually just a stealth drone, or even purely a cardboard model built to deceive you Westerners, letting your satellites capture it so you would think the CCP's military is already powerful enough to have an H-20, or that the CCP is so amazing? But it's not. Or perhaps, after causing you to misjudge, the CCP then uses this to gauge how much you actually know about the CCP, right? For example, after you misidentify that as China's large stealth bomber and make various interpretations, the CCP says, "Look, they have no intelligence; I don't even have this kind of stealth drone, they are talking complete nonsense!" Anyway, the CCP is also testing just how much the US knows about their military strength. Therefore, the US is actually very clear, saying that China's H-20 prototype has never even come out, and moreover, other analyses have also stated that earlier this year—more recently, TMZ magazine published another piece in February directly stating that the top general of the US Air Force Global Strike Command explicitly declared that China is at best a regional bomber force, falling short of global-range long-range strike capabilities. It said China is far behind regarding the H-20 bomber. Uh, Stephen Davis, the commander of the US Air Force Global Strike Command, was specifically interviewed by this magazine and talked about it earlier this year. He said the US is developing new combat capabilities, such as the B-21 and other intercontinental missiles, etc., right? But the CCP is at best a regional force, and there are many very interesting things written in there. The ultimate meaning is that your stealth, long-range capabilities, etc., are all falling very far behind inside the CCP. When will they have them? Well, we are still waiting to see. Really, our CCP shouldn't be bragging about your H-20 or whatever; stepping on Russia doesn't make much sense either, right? With this way of playing yours, the US sees it all. Right now you are just a regional force, at best a regional force, what's there to brag about? So really, the reason why nothing can be said is just that—everything.