[Lude Press] 9/24/2026 [ludepress.com]

The program focuses on the meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping in Washington, analyzing the White House itinerary, military aircraft flyovers, traffic control, hotel security, public remarks by both sides, and Sino-US economic and trade arrangements. It also discusses Iran's dual-use materials, flight, and crude oil dynamics. Additionally, the program interprets the White House state banquet menu, media clashes on-site, and Trump's reception of Xi Jinping and the political signals conveyed.

Video Link:

Full Text:

Hello everyone, and welcome to today's program, "Dr. Yan Speaks," on Ludepress.com, September 23, 2026. As Ding said, how many blunders did Bao Di make this time? You're right. Watching our program today is the right choice, because our program is mainly here to discuss the highlights of the Trump-Xi summit. We're going to have a big reveal, and we're definitely not going to hold back. I've specifically released the White House itinerary, and we'll cover everything we can see. As for why he made so many blunders, you can't ask me, you have to ask him. We don't know how spectacular it is, we just know it's spectacular, not that it's this spectacular.

This Mid-Autumn Festival was quite happy. We said yesterday that the paid commenters were still asking in our program if those watching and producing the show had mooncakes or gatherings. It's obvious they're starving in prison and don't know what the outside world is like. Are these prison paid commenters writing this? Let me tell you, you don't need to worry about whether we eat mooncakes or not. Although none of us might be willing to eat mooncakes right now.

But I can tell you, there are no mooncakes at the state banquet tonight! And we'll have to talk about the state banquet later because there's so much to discuss. Although Ludepress.com already discussed it from other angles this morning, today I will analyze it inside and out from the menu. And I also want to talk about the mooncakes that the paid commenters are so concerned about. In September 2015, when Xi Jinping visited the US for the first time, Obama did arrange them for him. But this time, Trump didn't arrange them for you. It will be very interesting to compare when we talk about it. Come, let's take a look. Today, let's start with the itinerary, because by looking at the itinerary, you'll know what we can talk about, and we can't talk about closed-door meetings.

Let's take a look. President Trump's itinerary for today is scheduled for 8 AM Eastern Time, starting with an executive meeting at the White House. This is not open to the public; it's his daily work time, internal. Then at 10 AM Eastern Time, he will welcome Xi Jinping and Peng Liyuan to the White House. However, it seems there was a slight delay, but it's not a big problem. Upon arrival, there will be a small welcome ceremony, very brief, just a photo opportunity at the entrance. After that, Trump and Xi Jinping will each deliver a speech. Yesterday, when Xi Jinping arrived at Andrews Air Force Base in the US, he also issued a written speech, which is largely similar to today's. We'll show you both later.

Then today, there is a gift exchange ceremony that is not open to the media. I don't know what the gifts are yet, but it was scheduled for 10:40 AM, and I remember it started a little past 11 AM. This is followed by the inspection of the ceremonial guard with rifle drill. This is not the kind of grand parade we might imagine; the parade mainly consists of a rifle drill, followed by a flyover of B-2 bombers and four accompanying F-35s.

After that, it was not open to the media. At noon, the First Lady will accompany Peng Liyuan to the National Museum of Asian Art. A few select media outlets with interview qualifications will have the opportunity to conduct interviews, but there's not much to discuss about this. At the same time, the expanded bilateral meeting between the President and Xi Jinping was originally scheduled for 12 PM; at 2 PM, the President will receive briefings and attend policy meetings. Among these three events, the expanded bilateral meeting is related to Xi and is not open to the public; the latter two are internal matters that Trump needs to attend to himself and are also not open to the public.

Before our program started today, at 6:45 PM, since Trump had listened to intelligence briefings and policy meetings in between, he was going to meet with Peng Liyuan and Xi Jinping again. Some media outlets were allowed to interview, but it wasn't public, so we might see photos later. At 7:55 PM Eastern Time, about an hour from now, Trump will speak with Xi Jinping again. The White House press corps will be present, but as previously stated, there will be no live questions, so it's unclear if anything unexpected will happen this time. Following that, at 8:10 PM, there will be a state banquet, which is not open to the public.

Okay, let's first look at what has already happened. President Trump is quite amusing. Besides his mischievous smile after landing yesterday, after meeting Xi, Trump posted on Truth Social saying Xi was critically ill, or that Xi had a stroke or cerebral hemorrhage in India. Trump directly debunked these fake anti-communist rumors, saying Xi Jinping was radiant, full of energy, and in excellent health, better than ever. He said, "Yesterday, I received Chinese President Xi Jinping at the airport. He was radiant, full of energy, and in excellent health, better than ever. As for Mrs. Xi, she was as beautiful and charming as ever." The latter part about Peng Liyuan was certainly out of courtesy.

We all saw Xi's appearance at the airport yesterday, didn't we? While it didn't look like he was in poor health, calling him radiant and full of energy might be considered subtle mockery, don't you think? This praise seems a bit over the top! Yesterday, especially when the B-2 bomber flew overhead, Xi didn't look radiant or full of energy at all. If you compare those screenshots, I'll post my Twitter later where I specifically put those screenshots together. Xi's complexion couldn't be described as ashen, but it certainly didn't convey any particular meaning, and he looked completely lifeless, lacking any human vitality. Only after the translator appeared could he barely speak a few words. But what was President Trump's intention in releasing this?

Actually, you see, President Trump's statement is directly refuting these fake news reports. You say I met with Xi, but Xi is critically ill, as if I weren't meeting with the person in charge. I'm telling you, this is the top leader! Look at The New York Times, which was still spreading these rumors on the day Xi arrived, saying that Xi Jinping's health during his US visit has drawn widespread attention, that he slowly descended the plane stairs during his trip last month, and missed a BRICS banquet this month, leading to speculation about his health. This US visit provides an opportunity to observe his physical condition.

So you see, after this happened yesterday, Trump saw it was fake news and immediately posted a clarification this morning. Besides, whether Xi missed a banquet or slowly descended the plane stairs, isn't that quite normal? To put it bluntly, the stairs were high and narrow. You can't expect Xi Jinping to act like a parkour athlete, sliding down the handrail as soon as he exits the cabin, or jumping down like a rabbit, right? So The New York Times, by desperately amplifying these rumors, had no effect at all.

Then, you see this morning, Mr. Evanina appeared on Fox again. Mr. Evanina is a regular guest on Fox. Mr. Evanina's segment is quite amusing. He cut it down to a few dozen seconds. But in it, Mr. Evanina mentioned that when Xi arrived yesterday, Trump welcomed him with fighter jets to showcase American strength, which startled Xi. This is the same as what we've been saying; great minds think alike. He also mentioned something else. He said that after Trump received Xi at Andrews Air Force Base yesterday, they parted ways immediately. Xi Jinping went to the former Trump Hotel in D.C., which has now been sold to the Waldorf group and renamed the Waldorf Astoria.

We've stayed there before; it's a very luxurious hotel. Then President Trump took his own car and then boarded a Marine One helicopter back to his residence. Mr. Evanina said, if you saw Trump leaving Xi there yesterday and letting him take his own car to D.C., without inviting him into the presidential motorcade to travel together. When Putin came, Trump was in Anchorage, and Putin traveled in the presidential motorcade with him. That was different. Trump's intention was: "Don't get in my car!" It felt like, "I don't want to spend any more time with you." He turned and took the helicopter, which is very fast.

And Xi's side is hilarious. Why did Mr. Evanina specifically mention that Trump let his motorcade drive to D.C. on its own? Because Mr. Evanina said this is also to show you what it's like for a dictator to come to our country. You have to close roads and do all sorts of things for his passage. It also shows the CCP what normal American life is like. Because your motorcade had to pass through congested highways, one side was closed, but the other wasn't. First of all, there's a video here specifically complaining about the road closures in D.C. caused by Xi's arrival, which already has congested traffic. Look here, this is Xi's motorcade coming this way, with flashing lights, and here, multiple lanes are closed for you. Compare that to the traffic flow on the other side, and you'll know it's rush hour, a weekday, and D.C. traffic is already congested, causing constant complaints from everyone. Now, because Xi is coming, roads are specifically closed for him here.

You just say it, this is not Mr. Ye saying Trump arranged it intentionally. Anyone who sees this, you American citizens, say you don't care about the CCP or not, I think that on TikTok now, or The New York Times says China is even better than our America, just look at the way they block roads. Just for the two of them to visit, many roads have to be blocked before and after! These are very crowded main roads in D.C., and they are full of traffic. So, do you think Americans complain or not? Americans complain even when their own president travels and roads are blocked, let alone when Xi Jinping comes? Isn't this immediately making Xi Jinping appear imposing here, but actually drawing criticism?

It also lets everyone see that if someone like Xi Jinping ruled America, this would be your normal life. Anyway, Trump would not let Xi save time at this moment, acting friendly with Xi, letting him get in my private car, my private plane. Just go by yourself, go as you should, I don't want to see you much at all.

So this road traffic issue is played very well by public opinion. If you don't believe it, go look online, like on TikTok, there are definitely short videos talking about these things. Because everyone sees Xi's motorcade, and then sees such a strong contrast, they will definitely complain. So you see how America plays this psychological warfare with every detail after Xi's visit, they grasp it with both hands, and achieve it with ease! Directly through these details. You usually say, oh, the Chinese system is bad, how is it, Americans are always naive and say, China has crime rates, we do too; China's government is dark, we have that too, so we don't think China is necessarily that bad, we are very dissatisfied with the American government. Look, this is the most direct way, you don't even need to go to China, you can feel it.

This guy is indeed less likable than these American politicians. If he comes, and blocks your mouth, and blocks your roads, wouldn't that annoy you to death? So there's no need to imagine, there are absolutely no citizens spontaneously lining the streets to welcome Xi, everyone is thinking: Why aren't you dying and going back quickly? Otherwise, I won't be able to go to work, I won't be able to do anything, it's too troublesome. It's too interesting.

Okay, then let me show you that after Xi stayed at the former Trump hotel, they put a large circle of iron sheets and barbed wire directly around the outside. See? This was taken at night. All these barbed wires outside were temporarily sealed off, completely surrounding the huge hotel very close to the White House. My goodness! What are you afraid of? There are some protests here, we won't talk about that. There are also many fake anti-CCP people inside, who go there to get political status, and there are also real anti-CCP people who go there. If they are not spies, they will abandon their identities. In short, this kind of protest, in fact, everyone saw when Xi went to San Francisco last time, there were pro-CCP people, so-called overseas Chinese united front people, and also anti-CCP people.

As a result, the foremost among the anti-CCP people was that big spy Yao Cheng, who beat up or exposed some of the people who were genuinely protesting, and he himself was fine. Oh, many of the people I organized to protest Xi today were beaten up, and we feel very sad, but the event was very successful. Is this how fake anti-CCP works? This Yao Cheng has already run back to China. This time there are some other fake anti-CCP people here. I don't know if some genuine anti-CCP people will go there and be innocently harmed.

Okay, look, this big wall surrounding Xi, how safe the White House is now! Near the White House, especially since Trump has already improved security in D.C.

For the 250th anniversary of freedom, there are so many activities! Regardless of whether people are rich or poor, whether they are politicians or celebrities, whoever goes to the front of the White House, just two blocks away, actually needs to block roads like this, and needs to stay in which hotel? Even if you are a foreign head of state, do you need to bring this big barbed wire fence? Let's be honest, if Xi is so insecure, doesn't the CCP always say? If you don't do anything wrong, you shouldn't be afraid of surveillance, you shouldn't be afraid of the state watching you, this gives you a sense of security. Then they build the whole of China into a big prison. Let's first look, if Xi staying at a Waldorf hotel can be so scared, then I think Xi should go to MDC or Guantanamo earlier, where he can sleep better. Because anyway, you stay inside, you don't come out easily, you don't speak casually, you don't have much sense of being alive. And outside there is such a barbed wire fence, right? What's the difference with those in Guantanamo? If this were an American prison, it would have to be a high-security prison, a top-tier prison to have this treatment, right? So it's hilarious.

And didn't the CCP brag before? They said that the extension of the Busan trade agreement, China would extend it until the end of Trump's term. Later, it was said that the US side was willing to extend it for half a year. Hey, what did I tell you all before? Anyway, whoever asks me, I say about this matter, what China wants to do, Iran also says it wants reparations, right? Iran is still calculating, how many billions do you Americans owe me? Is that possible? So what China wants is not important, the key is whether the US listens to you.

Just a few days ago, they talked about a six-month extension, and I thought you should just take that with a grain of salt. It's clear that the CCP is trying to save face. Since the US wouldn't agree to an extension of two years, they proposed six months, implying they were somewhat flexible. Then, you saw that Yellen announced substantive talks with He Lifeng on US-China economic relations. The discussion continued to focus on securing concrete and effective commitments to fully promote economic national security while effectively protecting the interests of American workers, farmers, and businesses. He also said that China proposed the idea of reaching a larger agreement on the 20th, and the US is willing to continue the Busan arrangement and also willing to study new agreement proposals, both of which are acceptable, and they will make the final decision that best serves US interests.

This tells you that it's fine for you to make empty promises, but if I get what I want, I won't be polite. Now, we'll see if you intend to break your promises, or if I'll force you to fulfill them. In any case, Yellen said that what has been agreed upon is the extension of the Busan agreement, just to January 10th, originally November 10th, now extended to January 10th, only two months. Think about what that means. What can be done in two months?

It's like the CCP wanted a 24-month extension, and the US said, 'I'll give you two months,' a 12-fold difference. Imagine this: it's like a debt collector coming to your door, you don't have the money, you don't want to repay, and you want to stall. You bargain with them, saying, 'Give me 30 days, one month, and I'll get paid next month and repay you.' Then they say, 'Don't give me that! I'll give you two and a half days, about a 12-fold difference, at most. Hurry up and raise the money!' Is that the concept?

Just compare these two timeframes directly. The US wants to grab you by the collar and make you fulfill what you've already promised, as much as you can, month by month, like squeezing toothpaste. They know you don't intend to fulfill it, but I'll do my best to grab you by the collar and squeeze it out. I'll give you another two months. Will you buy all the soybeans in two months? Will you resolve the fentanyl and rare earth issues in two months? If not, then we can't say what will happen next, really.

We said that the opening of this golden window of opportunity for conflict is before the end of next year. This is our inference. So, according to our inference, it's not too late to start after January 10th. Well, there are still some finishing touches here, and they are squeezing the toothpaste over there.

And you know, when Yellen was interviewed by reporters, a reporter asked him, 'What about that larger agreement you mentioned?' Yellen replied, 'I don't know if that larger one can be reached.' This means, 'They talk, I listen. If it's in our interest, we'll do it. If not, you can just consider it a butterfly flapping its wings.' It's hilarious, isn't it?

Then Yellen said a little more, mentioning that there are roughly three possibilities for Iran. The first is that the current ruling elite in Iran turns against each other. The second possibility is that the Iranian people rise up in rebellion. The third is that Iran reaches an agreement and abides by it. Yellen said that if an agreement is reached this time, he guarantees they will abide by it. He also said that this might happen before the midterm elections, or more likely after the midterm elections, but it is not affected by the midterm elections.

Actually, if you ask me, all three are clearly coexisting. The Iranian people's will to resist – just last month, or the month before, 10,000 people sacrificed their lives! Before that, 72,000. Internal strife is definitely happening. You know this time, look, Aragchi and Pezeshkian came, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs actively requested security arrangements from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and they handed themselves over to the CIA, right? You don't know how much they cooperated fully. And didn't we say before? This single security detail could help them with many secret meetings with the US.

At the same time, I saw the news that the Iranian delegation was supposed to come for the UN General Assembly, and many people were in the delegation, but the US didn't give them visas at all, just like they didn't give visas to Palestine. So you see, the US has multiple layers of security to exclude your informants, eyes and ears, and terrorists. Only those we recognize can enter. Think about it. They didn't even let the football team in during the World Cup last time; they were kicked out the night after the game, and many people couldn't get visas, right? So the US understands very well.

Regarding Iran, it's just a matter of timing, and you don't need to be too anxious. So, it's highly likely that the Iran issue will be around the same time as the midterm elections, or shortly after, and around the same time as Russia-Ukraine. If that's the case, the extension of the Busan agreement to January 10th will not affect anything. Where US-China relations will go next, right?

Okay, then let's look at Xi's written speech at Andrews Air Force Base. It was very short and full of empty words. But the funny thing is, Xi's written speech yesterday and his public speech today both started by mentioning 'Make America Great Again.' Americans were very excited, saying, 'Yeah, Xi said Make America Great Again!' Because he said that the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and making America great again can be parallel, mutually beneficial, and benefit the world.

Of course, what he means by this is that he's scared. If you attack me now, I'll be finished. But if you don't attack me, and I can fool you with nice words, then I can win later, right?

But when Xi said this, you see, he had to say, on the one hand, the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, that phrase he has to keep on his lips as nationalism; on the other hand, to make his speech sound good, he has to say things that Trump likes to hear. Make America Great Again was Trump's slogan and is his current policy, so Xi included it in his speech.

But think about it, who looks stronger and who looks weaker? American speeches never mention the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation; they always say Make America Great Again, right? So this is too funny! Xi is already groveling here. He can't help but say whatever you want to hear. Otherwise, he would have a very difficult time here for a few days, right?

But the Americans see this and think, "Wow, even China wants us to Make America Great Again, that's great. How can we become Great Again? We must first eliminate the greatest existential threat in history, right? So you, China, want us to be Great Again, which means you also want us to eliminate you." So when Xi included these things in his diplomatic address, his brain is really not working well, right? And you can see clearly, he has no other options, no options.

So, let's mainly look at the content of the speeches from both sides today. Yesterday's was very general, like a preface. Come, let's take a look at the speeches from both sides at the White House today, this is interesting, there are some details. Look.

President Trump and Melania welcomed President Xi and his wife at the White House this morning. They arrived in a motorcade and went straight inside to begin their speeches, which lasted about half an hour. President Trump spoke first.

Trump said, "I welcome you to the White House. I had the honor of visiting you in Beijing in May, where you hosted our delegation with extremely grand and beautiful hospitality. Do you all remember, when Trump went to Beijing, as soon as he got on the plane, Counterterrorism Director John Bolton told reporters at the White House: 'If Xi Jinping of China tries to do anything, he will get sick after absorbing it.' It's inexplicable, right? If President Trump gets sick or poisoned after returning, we will hold you accountable.'"

You say President Trump is recalling that it was extremely grand and beautiful hospitality. He didn't even dare to eat there. People here are saying, "Don't poison him! Don't think we don't know about your, especially respiratory, poisons or infectious diseases." Isn't this very disjointed, a huge contrast?

Of course, this is Trump's way of playing. You know, as we've always said, when Trump hosted Xi at Mar-a-Lago in 2017, didn't he bomb the Syrian base that day because of the sarin gas incident? Xi was enjoying a delicious chocolate cake at the time. Trump later repeatedly mentioned this detail in public speeches. He said: "Oh, that cake was so delicious! That night, as my good friend Xi Jinping and I were enjoying delicious chocolate cake, I received the news, and I told him: 'Hey, we just bombed that base in Syria!' You see, Xi at that time..."

It's a wonder he didn't choke on the chocolate, right? You see, when Trump talks to the outside world, he still emphasizes the cake, saying it was delicious that day. So now he says, "Hey, when I went to China in May, you gave us extremely grand and beautiful hospitality." What do you think he means by that?

And he said that President Xi Jinping is the first Chinese leader to pay a second official state visit to the United States. President Xi and I have built a great friendship since 2016. A true friendship is built on mutual respect for the vital interests of our two peoples. Damn it, listen to this! Both parties in the US Congress have said that China is an adversary that fights alongside enemies and is the executioner of the US military. But President Trump insists on saying this is a true great friendship and respect for the peoples of the two countries at this critical juncture. When has Xi ever respected Americans? Whether it's the 2 million deaths from COVID, the deaths from fentanyl in the unlimited war, or the US soldiers who just died in Jordan, does he respect Chinese people? Do we Chinese people know how to respect others? Let's all talk about it, what respect have you received? Right? I tell you, even the paid commenters can't say such heartless words. So you see.

Every word Trump says here is sarcasm. He also recalls our time together around the world, from Germany to Argentina, from Japan to South Korea, from Beijing to Palm Beach, Florida. Now, Milei of Argentina is openly siding with Trump at the UN General Assembly, saying that the UN is corrupt to the core, full of parasites who are just occupying positions without doing any work. We in the Americas will not associate with you, right? Meaning we will stand with the United States. And Milei's speech this time clearly stated that he wants to oppose socialism, oppose the far-left, socialism, and all that, right? So you see Trump talking about Argentina and Japan.

Japan, not to mention, when Sanae Takaichi was at the UN General Assembly, she met with Trump. The main topics discussed were, for example, the North Korean issue, the China issue, etc. What good things could he say? The CCP regime is shouting threats and attacks at them! And here, he also mentioned South Korea. Yesterday, at the UN General Assembly meeting, or rather the day before yesterday, Trump specifically singled out Lee Jae-myung and talked with him for half an hour. Publicly, Trump said he invited him to play golf together sometime.

Let me tell you, how Trump reprimanded Lee Jae-myung behind the scenes? If you just watch American or British dramas and how they depict these real diplomatic occasions, you can imagine how the US would reprimand him for the messes Lee Jae-myung has gotten into. Don't forget, Pedro, the leftist leader of Colombia, after Maduro was arrested, personally went to the US and met with Trump at the White House. Remember at the beginning of this year? All the arrogance he displayed last year was gone.

Trump also had a good talk with him, and after the talk, he stepped down as he should. And do you know what? The new president of Colombia, upon arriving at the UN General Assembly, publicly stated that he brought evidence this time. The evidence is how Pedro's previous pro-communist, far-left former Colombian government colluded with Iran and aided Iranian terrorism. So I'm telling you, there's more drama to come. Anyway, all the CCP's lackeys have also banded together, and their pledges of allegiance are getting faster and faster. Oh my.

Next, Trump talks about the funniest part, the second paragraph, see? We've told you before that Trump arranged for Xi Jinping and Peng Liyuan to visit the National Archives tomorrow. The main point is to show that he knows you're uncultured, so he needs to teach you a lesson. Look, isn't President Trump saying what we said: "This is an important moment for America, our 250th anniversary. Tomorrow we will visit the National Archives and see some of the great treasures from that glorious history, including the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights." These are lessons Xi has never learned, right?

And his brain can't even comprehend it now. Even if he finishes learning and takes these things back to AI for interpretation. Just imagine how that Doubao, that DeepSeek, would interpret it for him. As it interprets, it would say, "This topic cannot be touched!" Because if you knew what the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are, wouldn't that be equivalent to subverting the state power of China? If you understood all this, how could you uphold the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Republic of China with President Xi Jinping at its core? So you see, doesn't Trump's arrangement hit him where it hurts?

And he also said, "We will also see many artifacts that bear witness to the long and precious relationship and cultural exchanges between our two countries. It's truly incredible! Just as our ancestors crossed oceans to learn and build a better world, like they did before." Just wait and see tomorrow at the National Archives what documents Trump will show him. Besides, a long and precious past doesn't mean it will never change. If it turns 180 degrees now, does it still count as what's in the archives? Right? What does it matter?

Then Trump also mentioned, let's go through it quickly, that the Trade Commission achieved incredible success. That's exactly what Xi hates to hear, this trade agreement. He was forced to go to Busan, and with his weakness exposed, he had to talk with Trump. Trump insisted on mentioning this incredible success, right? The trade war, the trade war, the CCP boasted, oh, this is a win-win. It's like Zhao Laotaiye's butler beating Ah Q, is there any win-win?

That win-win only means that after they beat you, they win, and you get beaten. You say this helps your face turn rosy, you say this is a close relationship you've established with Zhao Laotaiye, right? You can only describe it desperately from this angle, saying you also won, but everyone can see clearly, can't they? So Trump said.

"This is an incredible success for us!" And we will also discuss urgent issues involving security technology and super intelligence, which Trump just renamed. Why are these issues urgent? Because the CCP doesn't have much time left, so they are naturally urgent.

And Trump said that throughout the long river of history, our two peoples have stood together across distances and differences, becoming allies in World War II. He mentioned the Flying Tigers going to China, the legendary Flying Tigers, and the contact between the US Marines and the Chinese people. There's a term called "共好" (gong hao), I really don't know what word this is. What does it mean? In Chinese, it means working together. I need to check the origin of this word, but he didn't say the Chinese Communist Party.

When Trump talks about World War II, he's talking about the Chinese people, right? He didn't say it was your CCP regime. Then he said, we now need to create a better future for our two countries, and that's it, very simple. Next is Xi Jinping's response.

Look, Xi Jinping, truly still that same old routine. He starts by saying he extends greetings on behalf of the 1.4 billion Chinese people. And then, he can't avoid the 250th anniversary of American independence, he has to offer warm congratulations. In his heart, he must be seething with anger, because he wishes the US couldn't even celebrate its 250th anniversary, right? How many attempts has he made to sabotage, to divide, to subvert? Yet now he has to congratulate them.

After the congratulations were over, it was time for that great change. We all said who is the great change and who is the great situation, and everyone can see it clearly now. But the thing is, this draft seems to only recognize these words, and Xi doesn't recognize anything else, still wanting to steer the great ship of US-China relations steadily and far. Trump said: "I can go to hell, I'll kick you off the ship first, then we can be stable."

Then he wants to establish good relations, maintain communication, enhance understanding, and seek common ground while reserving differences. Trump said: "If you want to communicate with me so badly, why didn't you answer my calls? I had to squeeze your soft spot last year, right? You're not honest. I said I wanted to visit China, and you didn't reply for a long time. Then I asked you to come to the US, and you pretended to have a headache, stomachache, and were spitting blood, playing Guo Wengui's game, not wanting to come, right? You say these words are not honest. Then you encourage departments like law enforcement, humanities, diplomacy, economy, and finance to strengthen communication. I really have to say something."

The US actually wants you to expand communication now, but you should think about the results after the expansion. After communication, will those people still be yours? Because who can't see clearly? Those who are truly shrewd, those who have risen to high positions within your system, right? Aren't they all shrewd? If they can't see other things clearly, they can see very clearly whether there is any danger to their personal safety within the system. The wind is blowing through the tower before the rain comes, and this is the current state of CCP China.

Before this great earthquake of opening up, all the sensitive animals that have feelings have already fled. You still think you can infiltrate US diplomacy, economy, finance, and law enforcement? I encourage them, hey, save some for later. You encourage them to come over, but when they go back, who knows where their hearts will be, right?

If you don't believe me, go ask. Ask those national security treasures and paid commenters on our show if they have truthfully reported what we said on the show to your Xi? If not, it means they have ulterior motives, and it means these guys are no longer trustworthy, right? Can you still trust them like this? No, quickly throw them into the ditch where they belong, and if they need to be chopped up for dumplings, chop them up for dumplings, right?

Then, he says, in short, without bilateral cooperation, world problems are difficult to solve. Open the door, hope for investment in China, and hope for joint cooperation, compressing the list of problems and lengthening the list of cooperation. Isn't it that our Chairman Xi is so uncultured that he can only repeat these simple words over and over again? Such simple and plain words, it's either great change, great change, great change, right? A great change in the era, a great change in the world, a great change globally; or it's about making lists, cooperation is also about lengthening the list, and problems are also on the list.

I feel like the cultural literacy of the person who wrote this draft is worrying! Just say it, you welcome investment here, oh, we also want to come over, you make this public, and hope you treat us fairly. The US said: "I am fair! To treat you fairly, we have specifically introduced the Graham Act!" If you were in the US judicial system, wouldn't it be fairer than your CCP?

We are afraid of any rule by man over the rule of law, so when it comes to how to treat CCP enterprises and how to deal with our cooperation issues, we will now use the Graham Act to ensure fairness and justice. If you are within this act, you will be held accountable, and we will hold you accountable fairly and justly. If you are not within this act, we can also sit down and talk with you fairly and justly, isn't that what it means?

But the question is, is this what your CCP wants? What Xi says over and over again is just Xie Feng's words yesterday: "Don't decouple, we can't afford to decouple." Then Xi still has the nerve to say shamelessly: "Both China and the US are major AI powers and should ensure that development is controlled by humans and benefits the people." Isn't your AI all stolen from the US's AI? You steal and steal, and then a weasel goes out to steal chickens, and then wipes its mouth and says: "Hey, my chicken farm and your chicken farm are both big chicken farmers." Is that how you say it?

Then he also said to strengthen drug enforcement. You didn't mention fentanyl, and people wouldn't have thought of it. After you mentioned it, everyone's number, right, directly entered their minds with 300,000 deaths per year, because this impression is very deep, how can anyone have a good attitude towards you?

It is said that both sides can increase direct flights. I saw that many foreign propaganda outlets were happily saying online: "Oh, it will be more convenient for the people of the two countries to interact now, Xi has said to increase direct flights." Is this about increasing direct flights? If the US really needs your cooperation, is the number of flights a big problem? We say that the US has even banned Iran from stopping its flights anywhere, right? According to your logic, would Iran come to the US and say, let's increase direct flights between Iran and the US, and then you won't beat Iran anymore? Is there any relation?

This is what you see in Xi's draft. He thinks he's speaking logically and comprehensively, but in reality, it's so vague and disconnected from reality. You can see that Xi has been sidelined, put there, mainly because his brain isn't good to begin with, and he's also troublesome, insisting on manipulating the language in various ways to showcase his Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy.

To establish one-man supremacy, this draft, to be honest, is indeed difficult to write, right? Because if you want to write something substantial, you have to do substantial things. President Trump, for example, his speech at the UN General Assembly yesterday, what Trump said at the UN General Assembly about what should be peaceful, what should be attacked, and what should be reformed, are indeed things he has done himself.

It's like, for example, if I talk about virus tracing and it blows up, I can talk about it endlessly. That's something you've done yourself, you haven't done anything. Guo Wengui also wants to latch onto us, wanting to claim our virus tracing efforts as his own. What they say sounds so hollow, illogical, and repetitive, just the same few phrases: "Follow Mr. Guo," "Mr. Guo has connections within the party," "Mr. Guo has intelligence," "Today he found some Guo Deyin," "Tomorrow he went to meet some scientists in Europe."

Then they bring up Wang Yanyi from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, saying, "Oh, if you Americans want to investigate Fauci, you should investigate Wang Yanyi and his scandalous relationships." What a joke! Guo's mind is limited, he can only spout this nonsense, and those who flatter him can only say these things. It's just like Xi's speeches, you listen and realize he only has a few set phrases, no logic, no facts, right? So when you read it, you find it very laughable, very ironic.

Look at Xi again: "We should not shy away from competition, competition is benign and has boundaries. We should have the right way to coexist on this planet without conflict or confrontation." The implication is, if you confront me, I can't resist! If your competition is malicious, then I have no boundaries! Then we can't coexist on this planet!

So you see, Xi's sense of crisis this time is truly undeniable. Including being led by the nose by the Americans. It was your decision, Xi, not to communicate with the US military in the previous years. Now you're being led by the nose to restore so-called regular dialogue and prevention mechanisms. The US says they communicated with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, why shouldn't they communicate with me?

Look, being led by the nose like this, Xi still puts it in his speech, as if it were something he did himself, as if he proactively sought regular military dialogue with the US. Oh, so this is what you call confused logic.

Then he's patting himself on the back, saying China and the US fought fascism side-by-side, as if it were the CCP's achievement, and he doesn't forget to mention the Thucydides Trap. Wow, the Thucydides Trap, Xi really can't give a speech without mentioning it these days.

We all know that the Thucydides Trap is not a commonly used political term in the US for a long time. Don't be fooled by how the CCP has packaged and promoted it over the years, both domestically and internationally. This term itself was coined in 2012 by Harvard professor Graham Allison, who was a strong supporter of the CCP and is now considered one of Xi's candidates for a new Kissinger. He coined this term.

And this term, let's be honest, a Harvard professor is just a professor. After studying history, he proposed a definition, but that doesn't mean it's the truth. He merely looked at Thucydides' "History of the Peloponnesian War" from ancient Greece and claimed to have summarized the military strength of over a dozen countries. This is not military strength, it's a historical story, and then he summarized the Thucydides Trap.

But China finds it pleasing to hear, so they bring it up whenever they can. Because it allows China to say, whenever the Thucydides Trap is mentioned: "Oh, this is because China is rising rapidly, and you Western powers are not adapting. This is your problem. If you go to war or have armed conflict with us because of this, and it's not peaceful, then this is the Thucydides Trap!"

So you see, in 2015, when Xi visited during Obama's presidency, Obama would have certainly liked this narrative, right? So Xi said at the time: "There was no Thucydides Trap in the world, but if great powers miscalculate, they will fall into it." In essence, the term itself didn't exist. Xi, being pro-China and flattering China, used this term so much that it became real.

Let me put it this way, in academia, excluding Xi and pro-China media, those pro-China, far-left academics who like this term, find it very peaceful and loving. Those who truly study history and have independent thoughts do not accept it.

Many scholars who disagree with this example and concept say that you have selectively chosen historical examples and, in the process, repeatedly applied, for instance, the political systems of ancient Rome to the present-day US in the age of super intelligence and the CCP engaged in unrestricted warfare.

His Thucydides Trap is a very crude concept, and this concept doesn't even address the state you're in when your opponent, like the CCP, is a Leninist organization that engages in unrestricted warfare against you and is determined to destroy you. This thing, you see, is selective, biased, and crudely applied.

From a scientific perspective, this term is a complete false proposition. But Xi still doesn't forget to mention it: "This trap can be overcome." Let me tell you, Trump doesn't recognize this term. Trump thinks, what is this term? This term shouldn't exist in the first place. If you walk too much, it's also a lie, a false proposition. So Xi has nothing to say here.

After finishing his speech, he again invited 100,000 American youths to China for exchange and study. I saw online that Americans were terrified upon hearing this, saying that you send so many people to our country every year to study, act as spies, infiltrate, vote fraudulently every other day, protest everywhere, incite subversion of the US, and then run off with drones to photograph US military bases, and now they can even装炸药 (install explosives). Not to mention the electric explosives. And now you want to send 100,000 of our people to CCP China, and Americans are very scared. I'm telling you.

Then, on Xi's side, it's very obvious that the US is very vigilant about this matter of inviting 100,000 Americans, American youths, to visit. Then Xi said again: "We have also brought envoys of friendship between the Chinese and American people, a giant panda named Ping Ping." Is it named Ping Ping because of Xi Jinping and Xi Yuanping? There's also Fu Shuang, who is to be settled at the Atlanta Zoo.

Oh my, really, giant pandas are just高级的韭菜 (high-level leeks). If CCP China has good relations with you, they send them to you; if relations are bad, they forcibly take them back, right? It's the same with giant pandas. Didn't Xi forget a couple of years ago that he wanted to bring back the giant pandas, leaving Americans unable to see them? And now, here he is, sending giant pandas over.

Our viewers say that this speech has no substance and jumps around. That's the feeling, right? And then, at the end, there's the realization of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and making America great again, which are not mutually exclusive.

See, he has to acknowledge "Make America Great Again." We don't know about those online paid trolls, fake anti-CCP people, including those scoundrels like Huang He Bian, who talk about "mega" every day. It's as if mentioning "mega" is like being a negative, extreme Nazi. Take a closer look, your Chairman Xi is also shouting for "mega"! When he arrived, he didn't forget to mention "mega" at the beginning and end.

And you all are shouting: "Oh, what 'mega'." As soon as you mention supporting "Make America Great Again," you yellow-skinned "mega" people, yellow-skinned Trump fans, use these words to insult Chinese people who support President Trump's values. Then look at yourselves, according to your logic, Xi Jinping is now also a yellow-skinned Trump fan, a yellow-skinned "mega" in your words. Shouldn't you be the first to strike him down! It's only when Xi steps down that you'll see ghosts!

Okay, speaking of this, didn't Trump also have a segment this morning to end his government affairs? Then a reporter asked him, what will you talk about with Xi?

Regarding the issue of Iran, what will you talk about? Trump said: "We'll see. I will talk about the Iran topic, and many other topics. The progress is also very good, including Iran." This is what he said this morning, presumably when reporters asked him after picking up Xi from the air force base last night. Let me ask you, does Xi really want to talk about the Iran issue? Have you seen Iran? Today, customs data revealed that at least 1,300 batches of Chinese military and dual-use materials have arrived in Tehran and can be used for missiles and drones.

This was exposed today! I ask everyone, how did the Iranian customs data get exposed? And it was shipped to the Iranian Ministry of Defense, 1,300 batches of goods, including components and chemical compounds. It specifically mentioned the temporary ceasefire between the US and Iran at that time. Xi also met Trump then. On June 17th, Xi even promised Trump in person that he would not help Iran. However, at least one batch of goods arrived at that time, on June 17th. As the US media reported, this happened precisely when Beijing was publicly promoting its efforts to help end the fighting, and you simultaneously sent weapons.

So the US media said, aren't you just strongly supporting Iran? Besides your satellite intelligence, there are also dual-use materials for making missiles and drones, right? So even Democratic senators couldn't stand it and wrote a letter urging Trump to focus on the CCP's aid to Iran, saying there is increasing evidence that Chinese companies are assisting Iran in attacking and killing US troops. See?

And the Treasury Department spokesperson said that the Trump administration has repeatedly warned and admonished Xi. So you see, Trump still wants to talk about these things with Xi in their closed-door meeting today. Put yourselves in Xi's position, how could he feel comfortable? On the surface, everyone is friendly, but in reality, isn't Trump giving you all the treatment? Look, public anger is rising, and the opposing party can't stand it anymore.

In private, Trump will directly cast aside that layer of warmth: "I like talking to Xi directly. Xi is a straightforward person." Just look at the situation, if it's not like sitting on pins and needles, what is it? As soon as he got off the plane, before he could adjust to the time difference, before he even opened his eyes, boom, a big arm bend flew over his head, and not just one, but two. Huh? And Trump was still chuckling, "How did you feel just now?" What do you think that feeling is? Really.

Speaking of Iran again, our viewers say that China is still selling tickets, and domestic airports are still receiving flights from Iran. But look, the UAE has indefinitely suspended flights to Iran, and Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan have also closed their airspace to Iran, right? Some Iranian Vares Aviation flights even turned back immediately after flying to Dushanbe because they weren't allowed to land there, and returned to Tehran's airport.

A plane was right above us, and it was found that it couldn't land, so everyone on the plane went back. And it was canceled directly from midnight. Whether it's Turkmenistan or the UAE, let's not even talk about the UAE, they have already signed the Abraham Accords and are doing very well. Turkmenistan is one of the five Central Asian countries, and Xi is currently putting a lot of effort into the five Central Asian countries. But look, when something happens, they tell you with practical actions that I choose sides, and I stand with the United States.

Right? Also, look, the Iran issue needs to be discussed. Besides the past ten billion barrels of oil, another piece of news came out today, saying that using satellite imagery and maritime data analysis, nearly 6 million barrels of seized Iranian crude oil, worth $600 million, were found quietly crossing the Atlantic Ocean towards the United States.

We don't know how much of this should have gone into the CCP's coffers. Anyway, quietly, you don't even know when it started crossing the Atlantic to the United States. Just like the oil in Venezuela, it quietly went to the United States again, and it has nothing to do with your CCP country, it's too funny, right? We don't know how much of this $600 million is CCP money, but it has nothing to do with your CCP country anymore. If you want oil, you have to talk to the United States. Anyway, Russia is also on the verge of being served on a platter. Some viewers are worried that the president will be fooled, right? Oh.

Don't worry, just look at what President Trump did during his term! And then think about it, he always mentions the stolen 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic, and he was hospitalized twice after being deceived by Xi. My goodness! How can you still think that Trump was deceived by him? Let's say, although I understand everyone's anxiety, just look carefully at the actual progress we have analyzed every day in our programs over the past year or so. All the peripheral issues have been dealt with, cleanly and thoroughly.

To be honest, if Xi had been arrested directly at the beginning of last year, and someone else took over the CCP regime, it would be like after the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, the second-in-command takes over, right? It's the same, it's still like Fordo occupying Iran last year, still so vicious. On February 28th, after Khamenei's ascension, weren't they still confidently shouting there?

This shows that it's not that solving one dictator will make all problems disappear. Rather, of course, you have to solve the dictator, but you have to proceed slowly with rhythm, strategy, and planning. You can't just shout and kill from the start, and can't stand to see even a little bit of civilized play, nor can you stand to see others laying the foundation step by step and solidifying things, right?

If that's the case, let's say, why do we always say that civilization has never really developed on the land of our CCP country? Due to brainwashing and closed environments, cognition is still relatively inadequate. We can't say it's low IQ, but cognition is still inadequate. You have to broaden your horizons to see the world, and our program is about these things, isn't it? We learn together, and we are exposed to these things every day, and some of us are even personally involved.

It's different, the more you watch, the clearer you become, and the more you improve your abilities and cognition. In this way, no matter what happens to the land of China, it can be saved, and it won't be fooled and dragged back again. Look, let's not say too much. Yesterday, I just talked about Senator Kennedy saying that Xi is the chief of reptiles. Today, a reporter asked him again, this is reported by C-SPAN, C-SPAN asked him, and the implication was probably that President Trump might be fooled by Xi?

Senator Kennedy said: "Xi Jinping is one of the biggest liars I have ever met. He learned to lie before he learned to speak. I don't think President Trump will be fooled by him. China, if you repay their evil with good, they will stab you in the neck."

Are our viewers relieved to see this sentence? Senator Kennedy is definitely closer to Trump than we are, right? These are things that he, as a senator from the Republican Party, is definitely personally involved in, discussing and making decisions, and he knows more than we do. Right? Look at his evaluation, the number one big reptile, the biggest liar I've ever met, who learned to lie before he learned to speak. And that sentence, you can't repay evil with good, otherwise, they will stab you in the neck. Isn't this

So Vance said that Trump will fire officials from the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, CDC, and other agencies who forced large tech companies to censor speech and suppress the truth about the 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic. See? Accountability is coming! There's no such thing as

You see, when the B-1 was overhead, Trump looked up, started grinning, and then turned his head. Remember when I showed you the head turn yesterday? Trump turned his head first, and Xi turned his head in this direction. In this direction, the B-1 had already flown past.

So this is obvious. Trump was telling Xi that MAGA Trump could do things that would leave you no time to react, with a B-1 bomber flying overhead. This is a long-range, beyond-visual-range combat platform capable of carrying a massive payload to strike enemies. Then you see, MAGA Trump, Xi hadn't even reacted yet, and the intended purpose was already achieved. I don't know how Xi slept last night. This picture of Trump is really great, and I feel the photographer captured it very timely!

And the key is, besides talking about the US, didn't we just say it? Mr. Ye Wanghui said it, right? Mr. Ye Wanghui definitely understands diplomatic etiquette, doesn't he? He wouldn't just say things casually. And this Laura Loomer, a media person very close to President Trump. She was also one of the first to say yesterday, when everyone was saying, "Oh my, why is Trump being treated with such high protocol?" They even had the US military lay out a red carpet, it's unbearable to watch. During this process, Laura Loomer posted a series of tweets, one of which I even retweeted and commented on.

Yesterday, around the time we were doing the program, Laura Loomer tweeted simultaneously, saying that Xi Jinping's expression when the military aircraft flew over was too wonderful, he looked furious. I said, if Xi knew military aircraft were flying overhead, shouldn't he have used more hairspray? That tuft of hair on his head was flying around, it really didn't look very good. I noticed our backend seems to have frozen, let me see if I can bring up the backend, because there are more fun things to show you later.

And in this, he said, China should be held accountable for disrespecting President Trump and our country, for stealing a fraudulent election, for murdering 1.2 million Americans, and for helping Iran kill American soldiers. I am very happy that President Trump, by displaying our powerful military might today, that B-1B yesterday, because he posted it last night, he said.

This display of powerful military might placed Xi Jinping within the encirclement of US military power, thereby demonstrating strength. Xi, I bet the noise at the time must have been deafening. It is clear that President Trump was intentionally sending a signal. Xi Jinping received far more hospitality than he deserved. Can you imagine how much patience President Trump had to hone to deal with so many terrible world leaders? It's truly remarkable that he could still express himself so elegantly and appropriately!

"Make way for the road," doesn't this echo what we're saying? So I'm telling you, those who understand President Trump, look at this; those who understand American etiquette, look at this, and you'll see the trick. As for what the CCP's propaganda says, child, when Xi came, the treatment was unparalleled, right? Xinhua News Agency also specifically added a sentence, saying that Xi received the treatment of military aircraft flying overhead at Andrews Air Force Base, which was very grand. This is all Ah Q spirit, all self-encouragement, Xi doesn't think that way at all, okay?

Then, I directly posted the screenshots again, the ones we showed you yesterday, the screenshots of President Trump smiling so cutely and Xi looking so pained. And today, Old Ranger Wu Mao once again posted a tweet, specifically showing the small expressions of Xi and Trump looking at each other and smiling at Andrews Air Force Base as the planes flew by. In fact, it's very clear, it wasn't a shared smile, it was Xi tilting his head to the side, Trump with a proud look in his mouth, like he was whistling. Yes, our screen is moving now, you can see this picture.

Look at this expression, Xi looking blankly at the plane flying away, right? And Old Er posted another sentence today, saying this is what you see when a supersonic bomber flies by, but you don't know what will happen. This is Xi's blank little expression, it's hilarious, isn't it? Let me show you the picture I posted in my tweet.

Let's take a look. Okay, our backend is working now, we've finally restored the backend, let me show you. I specifically posted these few pictures at the time, see? Omar also has similar pictures, everyone knows how to interpret this. And this Lianhe Zaobao is still bragging about the high-level reception.

Didn't we talk about the theme song of

I feel like the US understands things very well now. You know, Peng Liyuan sang it, and Xi always mentions it, saying when we fight America, we have fine wine for friends and hunting rifles for wolves. Trump directly kicked you off the plane, showing you what fine wine and hunting rifles mean. We have B-1Bs and B-2s! Don't talk to me about Huang Jiguang or Qiu Shaoyun then; I'm afraid you'll be the first to charge forward, right? China has been bragging about the Shangganling battle, right? So, did Peng Liyuan, after going back last night, also understand this issue? It's so interesting.

Didn't Trump kick out those reporters from CNN and MSNBC? And now those reporters are suing, and Trump said that because the district court hadn't made a ruling by the 22nd. When the reporters asked Trump if he would let those three media outlets back in if the district court ruled against him, Trump said that this judge is not a fair judge, implying that based on his past history, he is quite left-leaning. He said that if we lose the case, it's still uncertain. Anyway, the implication is that he will appeal.

By the way, it has been ruled today, and the judge said that these media outlets can return to the White House for the next 14 days, suspending the White House ban. Trump has already said he will appeal, but when Trump was asked about this on the 22nd, he said something very interesting. He said, anyway, we have the right to clean up fake news, and everyone knows that CNN, MSNBC, and Politico are fake news, right?

They previously said they wouldn't come to the scene to report and would collectively boycott, but didn't they still go to the UN General Assembly and stand outside the White House? Huh? Will they not report when Xi Jinping comes tomorrow? So these fake news outlets say one thing and do another; Trump doesn't take them seriously at all.

And sure enough, because there were so many reporters today, China's media, during their few minutes with the press and their time preparing at the White House, became a big joke to reporters worldwide, not just one or two, but again and again. See? This was this morning when Xi Jinping's and Melania's motorcade was arriving, and the official car would stop in front of the red carpet, with the Trumps welcoming them.

Before the Trumps had even come out, and before the car arrived, a Chinese reporter, in order to capture the image of Chairman Xi's brilliant and majestic presence, ran to the White House entrance, a place he shouldn't have been and without clearance. See these ladies from the Secret Service? They directly picked him up and told him he could only stand on the opposite side. See? The opposite side is the press area, where the reporters were already in position. They had someone brought over from the opposite side. And haven't you noticed? The people standing on the opposite side are actually security personnel, with security in front, followed by the honor guard. Do you think these guys from China are embarrassing or not? And it's not over yet; it gets worse.

Let me show you the press interview area, where reporters are in front facing the lawn. Something even more unbelievable happened here. This person really looks like a eunuch, and feels like a spy from state security. This kind of person must have been a spy before and is now maintaining order within the delegation, considered a mid-level eunuch.

He is here, and I will explain to you because we don't have the audio. Although the lady in the red dress looks Asian, she speaks English and is not part of the Chinese delegation. The people next to her wearing sunglasses and black suits are likely from the Secret Service and White House security. And behind them are the reporters who are already in position, while a Chinese reporter here, not the one from before but another one, is insisting on setting up his camera here.

This is neither the place he should be nor a suitable place for him to be, because by being here, he is blocking others, see? They are blocked behind him like this. So security, the Secret Service, and White House staff asked them to change positions, just move back a few steps, move back to this side. As a result, this mid-level eunuch here, the reporter, refused to move. This mid-level eunuch spoke broken English, couldn't explain himself clearly, and kept saying

Here comes the funniest part. Do you know why this lady pushed him? You can hear it clearly in the video, the lady said, "You keep stepping on my feet." That is to say, these reporters and this big spy, this big eunuch, from CCP China thought they were here to show off and bring glory to their ancestors. It was hard enough that they were clearly in the wrong, and the reporter was seemingly pushed by the Secret Service, and he thought, "Why did you push me?" As if you were going to make me stumble, and then you were going to try to pick a fight with them? The lady said, "You keep stepping on my feet."

For the past minute or so, he had been stepping on her feet! Didn't you see that? The lady stood there the whole time without pushing him, and he kept stepping on her feet. They went too far, and then some of them wanted to turn back and extort her? Oh, that makes me laugh so hard! And what's even more outrageous is that you see another video taken by someone else. Even the reporters couldn't stand it. Have you ever seen anything like this? When you visited China, you were directly driven into a small pavilion and locked up by the CCP at the Temple of Heaven. Now at the White House, you're causing trouble again, right?

Now, you see, they couldn't resolve the dispute, and they thought the Chinese side was out of options and could only find a spot. This is the same eunuch from before. They asked him to stay over here, but he insisted on being in the C position, the best spot. Other media outlets had already made arrangements, so why should you be in the C position? Let's just say, how would you photograph Chairman Xi's face? Can you make it look good? But he insisted on being there, and they let him stay there, not allowing him to move back or anywhere else.

You see his "no, no, no," meaning you can't let him go anywhere else. They are Secret Service, and I don't know why he's so arrogant here. I think he's just putting on a show to write a report back home, right? "I faced the enemy's guns, yet I stood righteously and fought for every inch of our rights! I am loyal to Chairman Xi."

The key thing is that at this moment, he said to the White House staff and other reporters, "I'm delegation." Meaning, I am from the Chinese delegation. The reporter squatting below directly retorted, "I'm delegation, who isn't a delegation? I'm from the White House press corps delegation!" Then he wanted the Chinese reporter to move to the middle, and they said, "Just stay next to me, it's fine here. Who isn't a delegation?" Oh, I think it's hilarious!

And it doesn't end there. After this dispute, after they finally all squatted down, Xi arrived. Then came the events from this morning. Later, after watching the B-2 ceremony, they went back inside. After the B-2 incident, they returned inside for a closed-door meeting, right?

During the closed-door meeting, the CCP reporter, in order to capture Chairman Xi's glorious image, this was definitely arranged by the CCP. Because American reporters know they cannot enter closed-door meetings, and are not allowed to, they waited in the White House briefing room, as there would be a briefing time in the afternoon. See? The Chinese reporters found a corridor and tried to sneak through it to take some pictures of Xi during the closed-door meeting.

For a beautiful photo, but the White House couldn't stand it and directly closed the door on them! The reporters were speechless, looking at this group. What can you say about them? They say every day that the Communist Party has led you from poverty to a time when everyone can use an iPhone, and even has AI. Stop bragging. I say even the eunuchs and guards from the Qing Dynasty wouldn't be this embarrassing, right? They don't understand basic etiquette, they don't know how to behave. And you say those reporters, they all look respectable, and they are using the most advanced equipment. What does that have to do with your CCP country? I don't believe reporters use domestic cameras, right? Just sitting there like this takes so long, and they can't figure it out. If you brought two police dogs, they would understand human affairs better than them, wouldn't they? If you brought a trained monkey, it would be more capable than them. This is really too funny.

There's a state banquet tonight, isn't there? News has already come out online that Xi has actually brought a small group, a handful of CEOs, but I don't know who they are. Anyway, it's not the grand delegation of ten thousand people from before. I guess they confirmed that this small group wouldn't be arrested, right? And this small group already has US visas. Now I understand. It's very likely that the enterprise delegation of tens of thousands of people couldn't come at all after the Graham Act was introduced because they wouldn't be granted visas. So this time, reporters specifically emphasized that a small group of Chinese CEOs who already have US visas arrived in Washington separately from Xi's official delegation. Currently, this group is waiting for news because it is still uncertain whether they will be allowed to attend Xi's state banquet tonight.

Why is it uncertain, the reporter asked? It mainly depends on the progress of the final stage of Sino-US diplomatic negotiations. This sentence is interesting. That is to say, if a small group of Chinese entrepreneurs enters the state banquet tonight, then everyone will know that Xi has satisfied the US this time. If they don't go in, it means that the US won't even give Xi face-to-face, right? You've negotiated to this point, and you still want to bring in a group of entrepreneurs? Get lost! Tell them to go back where they came from. Do you understand? So, whether entrepreneurs enter or not at tonight's state banquet is a point to watch.

Then we need to talk about what Lude Media said this morning, right? The First Lady specifically announced the details of the state dinner on the White House website. We won't go into too much detail about what has already been said. The main thing we want to discuss today is the menu.

It is said that the menu features top American local ingredients, blending exquisite Chinese flavors, making the traditional cuisines of both countries complement each other. It sounds quite plausible, doesn't it? The dinner began with Schramsberg Blanc de Blancs sparkling wine, paying tribute to the historic cup of peace shared by President Nixon and Zhou Enlai in Beijing in 1972, which used this American sparkling wine.

The first course was Creamy Butternut Squash Soup with Wild Mushroom Ragout, Crispy Prosciutto, and Scallion Oil. Don't be fooled by the description; it's just a bowl of soup with some wild mushrooms on top, and the ragout is bacon bits, like those often found in American breakfasts, fried until fragrant and placed at the bottom, drizzled with scallion oil. How are American and Chinese elements paired in this dish? The pumpkin soup is American, paired with wild mushrooms. The Chinese element is the scallion oil. We don't need to look at the explanation for this.

The second course was the main dish, Pan-Seared Sea Bass with Sesame Crust, served with baby bok choy, also known as Shanghai bok choy, and roasted eggplant, accompanied by a green sauce. What is this? It's fresh sea bass, pan-seared, then coated with toasted sesame seeds, served with baby bok choy, roasted eggplant, and a green herb sauce.

The third course was dessert, with no other options. It was a French dessert featuring vanilla cake with sour cherry jam, and a walnut French pastry at the bottom. This is basically the kind of dessert you find in American chain restaurants frequented by the middle class, like BJ's, Applebee's, etc. You know, desserts like Pozzuoli, where there's a very sweet pastry at the bottom, topped with ice cream and jam, right? The dessert was shaped like an exquisite fruit, paired with ice cream made with honey from the White House garden. This was followed by a cultural performance, showcasing the sophistication of the American military band to Xi, and floral arrangements. That's mainly what was said.

Let's take a look. Some of the CCP's overseas propaganda outlets have been busy comparing today's menu with previous state dinners. What was it like when former Chinese leaders visited the US? Look at how former leaders were treated during their visits to the US; lobster was a prominent star. Whether it was Deng Xiaoping's visit in 1979, with veal and various dishes, he didn't have lobster, although there was a baked seafood dish before it. Deng Xiaoping loved beef, so he was served beef at every meal. Deng Xiaoping specifically said that his most memorable impression of his visit to the US was the veal at every meal. Later, when Clinton hosted Jiang Zemin, there was chilled lobster and lobster tongue as appetizers, and then a main course of salt and pepper beef. This was red meat lobster, a grand dish, you know? When Obama hosted Hu Jintao, there was also lobster and ribeye steak, right?

Then look at Xi's first visit to the US in 2015, which is even more worth comparing. The appetizer was black truffle, a high-end ingredient, as everyone knows. Can black truffles be compared to pumpkins? The main course was again lobster with spring rolls, leek and mushroom rice noodle rolls, Colorado willow, and crispy fried milk with garlic. Were these main courses? There were American elements, but they were paired with Chinese elements, giving a sense of rivalry and sophistication. Even the wine served was specially selected Shaoxing yellow wine. Even more striking, it was around mid-September, the time of the Mid-Autumn Festival, so there were pumpkin mooncakes and lychee sorbet. Lychees are not American fruits; you can only find them in Chinese supermarkets. This was paired with a platter of ingredients from the White House garden. You see, it was completely designed to showcase a blend of American and Chinese elements, even presented as an equal footing.

Now, compare that with today's state dinner menu at the White House. What is this pairing? All the main ingredients are American, right? The creamy butternut squash soup is American in style, paired with scallion oil as a Chinese element. The sea bass is American, paired with sesame, bok choy, and roasted eggplant, which are Chinese elements. And then the dessert has nothing to do with you. Let me show you. I specifically used AI to create an image. Today's dishes, at first glance, look like this: this is the one with bacon, maybe a bit more bacon on top, creamy soup, this sea bass paired with some bok choy and roasted eggplant. It's hard to imagine the presentation being very elegant. Then there's some dessert.

But have you noticed what came before? We're not talking about luxury, just the quality of the ingredients and the care taken in preparing them, right? Think about it: lobster, truffles, chocolate desserts, steak. What kind of feeling do these dishes evoke? Think about it yourselves, are these two pairings the same in terms of visual appeal? Which dish looks more grand? So, don't you see? Trump is essentially telling Xi: You've arrived, but you're just a side dish, you're just scallion oil, you're just greens, you're just roasted eggplant, you're just sesame seeds. Do you still expect to be served as a main course? Who is the main and who is the side, can't you see? This is what he wants to convey.

As for why Nixon’s wine from that year was used, there’s a reason behind it. Don’t think for a moment that the White House said, “This wine that Nixon drank with Zhou Enlai back then represents the long and profound history of China-US relations.” Think about it: when Nixon visited Beijing in 1972 and drank this wine with Zhou Enlai, the US was just transitioning from not recognizing the People’s Republic of China to preparing to establish diplomatic relations. It was still several years away from that. It was at a time when they could have easily turned hostile, and if they had taken one more step, both sides could have been at daggers drawn, with the US in a position to destroy you. Now, we’ve returned to that point. They specifically placed that wine here to tell you: think about the past forty-odd years. The US hasn’t treated you badly, but just as the US can invite you to the table, it can also send you to the serving dish.

Speaking of which, we need to tell you another anecdote. Do you know about the Hall of Mirrors in Versailles, France? It holds a very important historical precedent. In the same Hall of Mirrors, on January 18, 1871, the King of Prussia declared himself German Emperor. Because France lost the Franco-Prussian War, Germany specifically chose the Hall of Mirrors to announce the establishment of its empire. Then, 48 years later, in 1919, Germany, having lost World War I, was brought back to Versailles to sign the Treaty of Versailles, again in that same Hall of Mirrors. It was a message telling them, “You are the defeated nation; we have a new European order.” The Hall of Mirrors was used twice, also separated by over forty years. The CCP’s China and the US have only been interacting for a little over fifty years since Nixon’s visit.

Do you see this pattern? This is a common metaphor in Western politics. Later, Germany itself played a reversal with France. In 1940, when Germany defeated France in World War II, they signed an armistice agreement in a railway carriage in the Forest of Compiègne. Why did they choose that specific location? Because that railway carriage had historical significance. It had been used before for signing agreements. In fact, by 1945, when Nazi Germany was defeated, another document was signed in that same carriage – I can’t recall what it was, but it was the same railway carriage. In any case, the point is to repeatedly showcase the same scene, where you were once the victor and once the vanquished. This kind of historical metaphor is very important. If you read Western history, you’ll find many such examples.

But the CCP is still boasting about it, claiming that the welcome for Xi with the same sparkling wine was truly grand. We should say it’s not enough, it’s meant to be a final lesson for him, to let him see. Honestly, this “last meal” is hardly fitting for Xi’s status; it’s so modest! So, when you look at Trump’s high-profile welcome for Xi, what’s the real meaning behind it? Can’t you see it clearly? Right? Tomorrow, we’ll see how he receives his final lesson! For today, we’ll end here with you all.