Are Everyone Here Criminals? The CCP's Strategy of "Kill a Batch, Imprison a Batch, Control a Batch"! The Ethnic Unity Law Keeps the Entire Population Living in Fear

This video discusses the strategy the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) might adopt after occupying Taiwan—namely "kill some, lock up some, control some"—and cites the views of Professor Ming Chu-cheng. The host believes Professor Ming's estimate may underestimate the cruelty of the CCP, and, drawing on the CCP's actions in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong, as well as the recently introduced "Ethnic Unity Law," points out that the CCP's intent to suppress Taiwan has always existed. The video also criticizes the influencer Kuan Chang for attacking Professor Ming, arguing that Kuan Chang's criticisms are purely for the sake of cursing and stem from a lack of understanding of the CCP. Finally, the host calls on viewers to consider how the CCP would control the people of Taiwan after an occupation and to share their thoughts on Kuan Chang's verbal attacks against Professor Ming.

Video link:

Full text:

Hard-hitting news makes listening to the news the most enjoyable. I am your host Sitai, welcome everyone to watch. Today we are continuing our series of heatwave videos, meaning that Europe is currently extremely hot, and many cities, including Poland and many other places, have already broken 40 degrees Celsius. Moreover, because many places in Europe do not have air conditioning installed, not every country is as developed as Poland. Poland even has air conditioning in the Warsaw metro, whereas places like Germany and France do not. So this time Europeans are truly having a bit of a hard time, and it is all caused by those environmental regulations and policies. Actually, air conditioning should have been installed in the first place, and summers are also very hot. And now we live in an urbanized world, in an urbanized society, many cities tend to be stuffy and a bit hotter, so everyone needs to take good care of their health and safety. So this time I also brought our family's Taitai and our cat Qiuchiu to the Polish seaside. It is much cooler here, offering a temperature difference of nearly 10 degrees compared to the city. The city is 35 degrees, while here it is 25 degrees. So we are making a series of videos right here where I am standing by the Polish seaside, and I really love the sea, which is Poland's Baltic Sea, touted as the cleanest and most beautiful sea in all of Europe. Many people like to go to the Mediterranean, but I feel that there are too many tourists there, and the water is very warm and uncomfortable. Here, the water has an icy feel, very refreshing, and simply amazing. I think Poland is far ahead in the lead, meaning there is no country in Europe more impressive than Poland. In Asia, Taiwan can still be compared to it, but I feel that Poland and Taiwan are alike.

Well, let's talk about something else I'd like to discuss with everyone today. Because in Taiwan, there is basically one person who is a news-generating machine. Whether it is Blue, Green, or White, all media outlets love to report on this person, and that is Guan Chang, Chen Chih-han. Every time he goes to China, whatever he says gets reported by a massive crowd of people. And because he says funny things, everyone loves to watch. Recently, he has been scolding a National Taiwan University professor, which is the retired professor Ming Chu-cheng. Ming Chu-cheng, I believe everyone knows him; he understands the Chinese Communist Party and is considered the scholar in Taiwan who understands the Chinese Communist Party the best. Oh, he is also a Falun Gong practitioner. Basically, if you look at the articles he writes or what he says on programs, you can gain a very deep understanding of the current regime within the Chinese Communist Party, whether it's factional struggles, social trends, or the causes and consequences of everything happening in China. Therefore, I strongly recommend everyone to pay attention to Ming Chu-cheng. This time, he spoke on Liu Pao-chieh's show, stating that if the Chinese Communist Party occupies Taiwan, he put forward a concept called "kill a batch, imprison a batch, and control a batch," meaning that a portion of the people would be directly killed by the Chinese Communist Party. And he suggested this would involve over 10,000 people. Then, "imprison a batch" means another portion of the people would be locked up. And then, there is also a batch of people who would be managed, meaning controlled, because once the regime changes, you are definitely controlled by a dictatorial regime, and you will definitely miss your democracy and freedom, so you must definitely be controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.

This has associations with what the CCP did to Hong Kong, only it would be more cruel and brutal, because that is my point of view. Hong Kong, it, um, it has never been independent, right? It used to be a British colony, and what kind of freedom did the British give Hong Kong? Economic freedom, freedom of speech, but regarding the right to participate in politics and political freedom, the British did not provide Hong Kong with enough guarantees. So, um, in the end, the British also betrayed Hong Kong, right? Because Deng Xiaoping directly threatened Thatcher, so she had to cede Hong Kong to the CCP state. But Hong Kong never, Hong Kong people never had a country of their own, so this is understandable. Therefore, when the CCP occupied Hong Kong, it basically didn't need to mobilize as many resources as it did against Tibet or Xinjiang, because Tibet and Xinjiang both had their own countries before. Taiwan is the same; Taiwan has its own democracy, its own territory, and its own population. It is a completely, fully independent country, and it is a country that ranks very high in terms of democracy, a developed democratic country. So, think about it, if one day Taiwan lost its democracy, would it want to be with the CCP? Would Taiwanese people think, 'Oh, it doesn't matter if we lose it, it's fine to unify with the CCP'? Taiwan has a brain, Taiwanese people can think, and Taiwan also knows how precious the right to participate in politics is. Taiwanese people would not think, 'It doesn't matter if we are governed by the CCP.'

Therefore, the 'screen one group, manage one group, control one group' approach proposed by Mr. Ming Junzheng is a very clever argument, and it is also aimed not just at the CCP, but at any authoritarian regime that occupies new territory. For example, Russia's occupation of Crimea is also a case, and what they did is similar. However, the only point where I might not agree with Mr. Ming is the number of people he mentioned, because if we look at what the CCP itself says, what Gao Zhikai says, and what Lu Shaye says—Lu Shaye directly said they would build re-education camps in Taiwan, meaning concentration camps. And Gao Zhikai mentioned any Taiwanese with Japanese ancestry, and at that time he said 10,000 people would either have to leave Taiwan or sign a statement saying they support a unified and prosperous CCP state. I think just from this we can see that it is actually not just 10,000 people. Um, I think Mr. Ming Junzheng is still a bit underestimated in this regard. If the CCP really comes, the number of people they kill, arrest, and beat will be more than 10,000; it will be many more! Moreover, with Taiwan's 23 million people, I think the population would directly lose at least 10 percent. That is at least, because when such a cruel and brutal regime occupies a successful democratic country, besides war, it will also carry out a major ethnic cleansing. It has already carried out ethnic cleansing against Uyghurs and Tibetans.

The reason I want to talk about this topic is that our channel recently analyzed what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would do through legal means if it were to occupy Taiwan, and how it would make Taiwanese people feel like they are Chinese. Regarding this approach, when he criticizes Professor Min Chu-cheng, he probably doesn't even know what to criticize because he doesn't understand the details of the CCP regime. Professor Min has spent his whole life studying the CCP, so he doesn't know how to refute him, and thus just resorts to random insults. He says, "Anyway, he is the national advisor of the 'Blue Birds' (Qingniao)," but Professor Min has nothing to do with the "Blue Birds." He is arguably more of a pro-Republic of China (ROC) figure; he identifies with the concept of China. He is simply anti-communist; he is not someone who supports the CCP. As for Guan Chang (the Gym Owner), it feels like he is criticizing just for the sake of criticizing, as he doesn't even hit the mark. He said that it wouldn't be too bad if the CCP were to govern Taiwan, but the problem is that the China governed by the CCP experiences floods every year, and a huge number of people die every year due to the CCP's poor management. Speaking of management, the CCP can't even manage its own China; every time they encounter flooding, they release water from dams without warning. What does "releasing water without warning" mean? You are at home, and suddenly the dam needs to release water, and your whole house is flooded, and you drown. You wouldn't even know it was coming because there was no warning. They won't say, "Hurry and escape, we are going to release water." No, it is a release without warning, something that happens every year.

Speaking of management, the CCP's ambition to invade Taiwan and its intent to suppress those who support Taiwan have always been there; they have always existed. The recent "Ethnic Unity Law" is actually quite laughable. According to the CCP's narrative, Taiwanese people also belong to the "Chinese nation." However, the law specifically includes provisions on how to deal with Taiwanese people if they do not identify as Chinese. Furthermore, if you are abroad and you are not Taiwanese, like Stan, they will still take action against you! You are violating their laws—this is long-arm jurisdiction. This is the CCP, the most violent and evil regime in the world today. Moreover, Guan Chang, who was once anti-communist—I think he was genuinely anti-communist—I don't know what happened to him now. He goes around criticizing everyone; this person was criticized by him, and that person was criticized by him. Everyone who understands the CCP very well has been scolded by him, including Professor Min Chu-cheng. I think Professor Min is very innocent; he stated something, and what he said was actually not even the most severe scenario. He was estimating what might happen in the mildest of situations. The actual situation might be even more exaggerated, but even this kind of estimation is unacceptable to Guan Chang.

What do you all think about this matter? Please leave a comment in the comments section. Think about it: if the CCP were to occupy Taiwan, how would it control the Taiwanese people? Let's discuss this. And what do you think about Guan Chang criticizing Professor Min Chu-cheng like this? I am quite curious about his thinking. Thank you all for watching. If you like my content, please like, subscribe, and leave a comment. Now, here and below the video, I will attach the subscription link to the website. I am Stan, see you next time, bye-bye.