Ruined Britain and still dare to cry? Starmer leaves office in disgrace! Why did Labour's landslide victory collapse?

The video focuses on the resignation of UK Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his declining popularity, analyzing how despite winning a parliamentary majority in the election, the Labour Party has faced criticism over policies related to welfare, environmental protection, immigration, public security, speech control, and the Chinese Communist Party embassy project. The content also discusses the economic, labor, and illegal immigration issues caused by Brexit, as well as the potential political choices facing Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham.

Video Link:

Full Text:

Today, amidst the European heatwave, we came to the Baltic coast. I want to talk to you about a topic being discussed across Europe, which is the resignation of UK Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

"Once I finish the biggest job in this country, I will spend more time doing the most important job: being the best husband to my wife Victoria. She has always supported me through the happy and unhappy moments, and being a better father to my children."

And this story is quite crucial because when the Labour Party was elected, it was considered a landslide victory. He secured a majority in parliament, but by the time Starmer resigned, his approval rating was also at an all-time low. How on earth did this happen? And in what direction is the future of the UK heading? Today, we are going to have a thorough discussion about the current constitutional crisis in the UK.

Before we dive into today's topic, let's take a look at the Baltic Sea in Poland—it's so beautiful, with this clear water and cool temperature. Right now, during the European heatwave, many places are scorching hot, and many people dare not use air conditioning, or even dare to install it. In fact, many places ban the installation of air conditioning altogether in the name of environmental protection.

This includes the Labour side; they also support those environmental policies, but they always forget that European countries are heading in the direction of deindustrialization. The problem is that while Europe deindustrializes, China and India are actually becoming increasingly industrialized. They are building more and more factories, and their carbon emissions are many times higher than ours.

So, Europeans stopping production only leaves the Chinese to produce everything, shifting the blame from Europeans harming the planet to the Chinese harming the planet—is that what it means? Of course, think about it: your European environmental regulations require every factory to comply, and every business must follow them. Do the Chinese have those regulations? Absolutely not.

Therefore, I still advocate that everyone should produce goods domestically, and if you can install air conditioning, you should install it, because this relates to your own personal safety. Look, when it's 40 degrees outside, can you not use air conditioning? Of course, some people choose not to use air conditioning and end up losing their lives, so you must be very careful about this.

That includes Starmer, and includes the UK Labour Party. Recently, the UK's automotive manufacturing industry has become very miserable, precisely because of those environmental regulations and policies. Take the former British company MG, for example; where is it manufactured now? Which country's company has it become? It's a Chinese company, isn't it? So, the British have lost their own manufacturing capacity, and these things are all part of the Labour Party's policies.

However, you have to consider that when the Conservative Party was in power in the UK, they also made quite a few wrong decisions. Their Prime Ministers kept changing, and on top of that, Brexit was quite a mess. They had what is called a Hard Brexit, which was a very difficult process.

This also led to them having a Prime Minister who only served for forty-some days in a very short period, and every Prime Minister didn't last long. So, in the end, the British people were just tired and felt that the Conservative Party's governance was not working, which is why they allowed the Labour Party to win by a landslide.

However, when we say the Labour Party won by a landslide, a big problem is that the British conservatives—not the Conservative Party, but conservative voters—were divided, and this was also reflected in parties like Reform UK, which took away a lot of votes from the Conservative Party.

So, it's possible that in those constituencies, the combined votes for the Conservative Party and Reform UK were higher than those for the Labour Party. But because the Labour Party is a single party, while the conservative vote was split between two major parties, the Labour Party naturally secured everything, leading to a landslide victory. They now hold a majority in the UK Parliament.

But the promises they made have ultimately not been fulfilled. They originally said they wouldn't cut benefits for the British people, yet Starmer wanted to cut benefits for the elderly as soon as he was elected.

Furthermore, with various international crises, the UK hasn't handled things very well. Regarding crime rates, the UK also suppresses and cracks down on people protesting, or those concerned about rising crime rates or the increasing number of illegal immigrants.

Recently, they have also ordered many facial recognition systems from China, and coupled with censorship and speech control, these things have made the British people unable to stand it. So basically, even though it's the Labour Party, they haven't kept their promises; instead, their various policies are becoming increasingly distorted and failing.

The Labour Party claims to support labor rights, but what they have pushed for workers hasn't made workers' lives better, nor has it allowed workers to earn enough money. Instead, they have allowed more illegal immigrants to enter, who then take jobs away from the British people, which has led to an increase in crime rates.

And even with rising crime rates, the British police often don't enforce the law against those who are truly committing crimes. For example, recently a Polish-British man was killed by an illegal immigrant, and the police were actually going to arrest the Polish man while releasing his attacker. This is a terrifying thing.

So even within the Labour Party, people don't support such policies. Additionally, those of us who understand the CCP's united front work will notice that the super-sized embassy—the spy center for the CCP in the UK—was approved by Starmer's government.

This has led to a situation where people from the Labour Party, the Conservative Party, and Reform UK all disagree with Starmer's policies, leading him to announce his resignation while his approval ratings were at their lowest.

So, will his resignation change anything? Currently, the next Prime Minister is likely to be the Mayor of Manchester, Burnham. Personally, I think Burnham is also a leftist and a member of the Labour Party, but he is generally more pragmatic and more pro-European.

Because everyone can see that after Brexit, problems like rising crime rates, illegal immigration, and economic decline are all issues caused by Brexit and the loss of the European market. Burnham takes a more pro-European stance, so we will have to wait and see. Currently, his approval rating is also much higher than Starmer's.

He will have two paths: first, he could finish Starmer's term as Prime Minister, which is three years, or he could call for another early election. If he calls for an early election, he would have to submit the relevant documents to the government to request another early election.

The problem now is that it is dangerous for him, because it is possible that the right wing will, he will lose the majority of seats in Parliament, the left wing will lose the majority of seats in Parliament, which is something that could happen, because the British right wing is still quite strong right now.

Another option is for him to finish his three years, and after finishing his three years, he basically won't be able to push through many policies that are different from Starmer's previous ones, because he lacks public support, so he is stuck with these two paths, neither of which is good.

Actually, British Prime Ministers have it very tough these days; no matter which faction you belong to, it is very tiring and very difficult. As of now, it might be slightly better than Starmer.

If the UK were to hold another election, and if they were to elect a more pragmatic government, and let the Conservatives return to power, and the Conservatives would reflect on the mistakes they made in the past, perhaps the UK would move in a better direction.

So how did British society become like this, and how did it encounter this kind of constitutional crisis? I think many things are related to propaganda. For example, the original Brexit referendum was largely driven by fake information, fake data, and misinformation.

British people went to vote to leave the EU, and basically, when checked later, many British people said, 'I don't know why we voted to leave the EU in the first place,' and they also don't know that it is now less convenient to travel to Europe or do business with Europe, so they feel it is very absurd, having voted blindly without understanding the situation well enough.

Now, the UK also holds regular polls, and if the Brexit referendum were held again, the majority of British people would choose to remain in the EU.

I think Brexit, and the forces behind Brexit, were influenced by many people, including Russian propaganda and Chinese propaganda. Because for totalitarian countries like Russia and China, a divided Europe is the best outcome, so this can also be considered a victory for their CCP overseas propaganda.

Since Brexit, the issue of immigration that the British people complain about is that, although the UK was not in the Schengen Area back then, if you look at the overall outer borders of the EU, the EU helped the UK block many immigrants from other places, such as Africa or the Middle East.

After Brexit, the number of illegal immigrants has actually become higher, more outrageous, and their routes to the UK have become even more absurd. Some come directly from France, taking rubber boats directly to Dover, directly to the southern part of the UK, and the British government can't do anything about it.

This is the result of Brexit; when you were in a common area with the EU, the EU could actually help you block some of them.

On top of that, the UK originally had a serious labor shortage, and this labor shortage was helped by labor from Poland, Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and the Baltic states.

Most nurses, the nurses in the UK, used to be mostly from Poland, and then perhaps plumbers, or those working in construction, many were also people from Poland or Romania.

And because of the EU, it was convenient, and there was no need to apply for any special permits in the UK, and even if the salary was not considered very high by British standards, one could still live, so this was also a benefit that the EU brought to the UK.

Now it has turned into Poles not coming, and not wanting to go either, and the same goes for the Czechs, Romanians, and people from the three Baltic states, who are no longer going to the UK.

Then those coming from Africa, from the Middle East, such as from Afghanistan, or from Syria, most of those people are not finding jobs in the UK to contribute to this society, paying taxes, and making the UK more prosperous; instead, they are living on welfare, so it has become a greater burden on British society.

And then there is the issue of crime rates; these are all the consequences of Brexit, which was originally pushed by the Conservatives—and I am also a conservative—so it wasn't thought through, and it was only recently discovered that the consequences are terrifying.

Then they elected Starmer, and Starmer has also been doing a pretty terrible job as Prime Minister. His only advantage is that he knows how to communicate with Trump, but in the end, he also fell out with Trump.

So, let's see if Burnham can manage to maintain the relationship between the UK and the US, and maintain the relationship between the UK and Europe, and the relationship with the EU, so we will have to wait and see.

Many problems—and this is something our channel has also been talking about constantly—are caused by propaganda, propaganda, and more propaganda. Therefore, I hope that through these recent years of issues with the British economy, immigration, and crime rates, the British people will think clearly before casting their votes to choose someone who is truly fit to lead the UK.

God truly bless the UK, because I also studied there, and I have very deep feelings for that country. Seeing it become increasingly dangerous, while electricity bills, fuel costs, and all kinds of other problems keep rising, I feel deeply regretful. I hope the UK can return to a normal path of development.