[Lude Society] 9/30/2026

This episode mainly discusses the attempted terrorist attack at the Royal Air Force Fairford in the UK and the attempted hijacking of a flight from Dubai to Israel, analyzing the geopolitical motives behind the events and the potential role played by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). At the same time, the program reports on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's urgent talks in the US, as well as the latest developments in the research and deployment of laser weapons by the US military.

Video link:

Full transcript:

Hello, everyone. Welcome to today's September 30, 2026 Lude Media Dr. Yan Talks program. First of all, let me greet the audience. Look, a viewer named Jin Xingchen said it very well: terrorist attacks happen over and over again, and divine miracles appear over and over again, which shows that God has not abandoned the free world. Let us pray! No matter what you believe in, as long as you have kind thoughts in your heart and keep giving likes—well, that is wonderfully said! It really is like that. Look, the attempted terrorist attack on the Fairford Air Force Base in the UK was just thwarted, right? As a result, those terrorists are still at large, out on bail without security, right? It's simply unbelievable. It's like in California, US, where they say robberies under 800 dollars are not considered crimes, and then some robberies over 800 dollars, well, an unspecified amount can be released on unsecured bail? Americans all find it hard to accept, yet here in the UK, people can be released directly on unsecured bail even for attempted terrorism. Who can you reason with? Right? But even with all this, the attack didn't succeed. It truly is God's blessing! In addition, some viewers said that today is the National Day of Commerce in China. Hey, have you all noticed? Just before the National Day on October 1, rushing back to China, having just left the US, the UK Fairford Air Force Base almost suffered a terrorist attack, and this aircraft incident in Israel, right? It also almost led to a very terrifying event. Just imagine, it happened at a place very close to the Israeli border, and its final destination was supposed to be Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv. I saw a lot of materials today; the hero passenger who finally saved the plane told everyone that when he discovered this, it was about an hour and ten minutes of flight time away from the final landing, meaning it was about to enter Israeli airspace from the edge of Saudi Arabia. You really have no idea where its final destination was supposed to be! It's terrifying. Look at Tel Aviv, and as everyone has seen, the buildings are very dense, right? The whole situation is like this—let me ask, why do I have such an ominous feeling? I always feel that all of this looks like someone preparing a National Day tribute! I am not just saying this casually; everyone needs to understand this matter. Let's not talk about conspiracy theories right now. The things happening in the world today, for instance, today's attempted plane hijacking, and the three cars full of terrorists going to bomb Fairford—let me tell you, before it happens, if you say anything like that, people will definitely call you a conspiracy theorist. How could that be possible? Ah! Terrorists swaggering over to bomb Fairford, and then the UK letting them out on unsecured bail—how is that possible? The co-pilot of the hijacking almost killed the pilot, and then, at the critical moment, the captain managed to open the cockpit door, and then so coincidentally, a passenger saw it, rushed over within dozens of seconds, and subdued the co-pilot. I'm telling you, if you watch Mission Impossible or whatever is written in these things, if this event hadn't happened and you wrote such content into it, I guarantee you that more than half of the audience would say the scriptwriter is terrible and talking nonsense—how could such a thing happen? Even if it happened, there's no way you could stop it, right? And the remaining half would say, never mind, never mind, let's just watch it as a short drama, how thrilling! But in real life, if you ask me whether this could happen, it's just like the overbearing CEO falling in love with a 60-year-old terminally ill impoverished elderly person, right? It's impossible. So you see, time and time again it displays divine miracles, but at this timing, we really have to say it makes people extremely suspicious. Don't forget that after the COVID incident back then, do you remember we dug up that Tong Yigang, a major general specializing in biological weapons from the Chinese Academy of Military Sciences, specifically published remarks saying, "We have already determined that in 2019, which is the 70th anniversary of the founding of the state, right? Just before the National Day, the novel coronavirus completed its evolution." Do you think words like this sound like something a normal person would say? Ah? Isn't this typically like underworld gangsters speaking in code, then weaponizing it with the intention of killing people around the world, and then secretly treating it as a tribute, speaking it out, while His Majesty is overjoyed, right? The ones who should get awards get them, and the ones who should be promoted get promoted. So I look at this timing—just think about Xi suffering such humiliation in the US. Don't for a second think that Xi hasn't figured it out yet. At least in this, he was first scared out of his wits, right? And then the misery of the world—everyone is talking about it. I'm telling you, Xi really might! "I suffered humiliation, I'm writing it down in my little notebook. The moment I leave, I must retaliate." Then with a single command, the subordinates immediately react like a chain reaction of dominoes, just so that His Majesty can get his revenge, right? Look at the US and Israel, the most important anti-communist forces and the best allies of the US, right? And then trouble starts brewing right here, immediately targeting the air force base and the flights heading to Israel. Truly, we must speculate on this with the worst possible intentions, right? Our imaginations need to run wild. In short, the things happening around us now—if you listen to them, they are nothing like what normal people would ever dare to imagine before.

Especially if you were to go back to 2019, before that Wuhan virus was released, and you said these things would happen, everyone would simply find it impossible to believe, right? So, we are talking about this matter. Wait a moment, let me share some more updates with everyone! Let's take a good look at what other details there are.

Anyway, I just feel this way about the whole thing. This morning, the Lude Media also mentioned that the plane in Kunming at that time was also a 737, and directly described it as a dive-style descent. I remember when this first came out, there was a lot of discussion online. Of course, the CCP later deleted it, right? Censored it. At that time, some people online said it very much looked like the CCP, you know, this very likely was the CCP practicing some kind of dive-style descent drill. So, I mean, getting some death-defying agents or whatever, isn't that totally normal? Right? You never really know under what circumstances those agents pulled it off in the end, it's hard to say. After all, as we've been told, the CCP regime would test a new biological weapon on the general population first, and they even dared to unleash hemorrhagic fever onto the people of Xi'an. You can hardly say they wouldn't do something like this, right? Why give a guarantee that they wouldn't do this? Anyway, that's how I see it. Relying solely on Iran and those terrorists, they could never make this incident have such a huge impact. For instance, you could ask whether those terrorists supported by Iran could carry out some terrorist attacks—definitely yes, right? But you say their target was in the UK, they chose RAF Fairford, and then it was the US that discovered it, while the UK hadn't even found out yet. Although both Rubio and Trump said the UK was cooperating with the investigation, you have to take those words with a grain of salt. Why did this happen on your soil? Well, maybe that air base doesn't have much to do with the British military, but such a big thing happened on your territory, and if you didn't notice it beforehand and had to rely mainly on the US military to discover it, then I'd say, what about the terrorists bombing Buckingham Palace, Westminster Abbey, or London Bridge—those iconic landmarks? Wouldn't that be even easier? Right? Yet we didn't see these terrorists doing that. If I may speak bluntly, if terrorists want to carry out something relatively easier yet far more sensational, London's iconic landmarks would definitely be their preferred choice, right? How could any of that compare to an air base where US B-1, B-2, and B-52 bombers are stationed, which has strict, rigorous monitoring, and is a place guarded personally by the US military? And yet, these fearless guys went ahead and did just that, and it actually ended up being spotted by a nearby farmer, while British police and law enforcement departments didn't notice a thing! Then look at the matter of the Emirates flight, right? The UAE and Israel have now signed the Abraham Accords in the Middle East, and their relationship is growing increasingly close. Just think about it: with a play like this, both sides got dragged into it—the UAE on one side and Israel on the other. This could create a lot of friction between the two countries due to the investigation. Just think, leaving everything else aside, if we only talk about operating from the perspectives of cognitive warfare, public opinion, and fake news, how many angles are there to manipulate? Trying every possible way to ruin the relationship between these two sides. Look, regardless of whether it's fake news, cognitive warfare, unrestricted warfare, or others—even deeper ones involving intelligence operations—targeting either Israel or the UAE is quite advantageous to the CCP state. Now look at the UAE cooperating with economic corridors and whatnot; the Xi CCP must be smoking with anger, wouldn't you believe it? Ah, I treated you like a treasure vault of Alibaba, and you just handed the open-sesame password directly to the US, right? And on top of that, your relationship with Israel is getting better and better. Although you both have things like the Iron Dome system—after all, isn't Israel already helping the UAE build an anti-air defense system similar to the Iron Dome?—what if the commercial flights operating between your two countries run into trouble? You didn't expect that, did you? Don't say I didn't warn you; if this point was really intentional and hit both sides, how would you calculate it? The forces behind this wouldn't lose anything at all, right? All they need to achieve—provided there is no Almighty God lending a hand, no divine protection—is for this plane to go down. To put it bluntly, even if it didn't crash into somewhere like Tel Aviv or hit Israeli territory, if it had fallen in Saudi Arabia, that would also be a huge deal. Do you know what kind of facilities are located in Saudi Arabia? Besides, Saudi Arabia's relations with Israel haven't reached the point of normalization yet. And look, whether Israel and Saudi Arabia are going to establish diplomatic relations is precisely what everyone is focusing on right now. Last week, a meeting was held in the UAE, initially said to be attended by Israel. Later, it leaked out that countries without diplomatic ties with Israel—such as Kuwait, Oman, Pakistan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia—actually went. Furthermore, sources said right after the meeting that it was very likely Saudi Arabia and Israel would move closer together, right? Look at how Saudi Arabia has been battered into such a state by the Houthis, while the US says, 'Oh, my spirit is willing but my flesh is weak; I can only provide you with some intelligence support, but I can't help with US military force.' So you tell me, under these circumstances, if Saudi Arabia is willing to establish diplomatic relations with Israel, normalize ties, sign the Abraham Accords, and let Israel help it strike the Houthis—well, let's just say absolute military strength is definitely enough, wouldn't you believe it? How formidable Israel is in this aspect! As for Saudi Arabia, it's really hopeless; they haven't fought many wars, right? Moreover, once a war starts, their own leadership—to put it bluntly, being an authoritarian state—gets panicked too.

So you see, the current overall situation in the Middle East—in fact, as we’ve all said, Iran is already at its end. Abbas Araghchi, today being Wednesday, is rumored to have just left New York. Has he actually set off by now? You have no idea, right? You say, why does Abbas Araghchi want the US State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service to protect him, and why does he need to stay in the US for so many more days? Doesn't he know he is an Iranian, and inherently a sensitive target in the US? Furthermore, the two countries are at war, and doesn't he know that the more activities he engages in in the US, the more intelligence related to all things Iran is essentially handed over to the US for them to gather to their heart's content, right? Besides, if he’s so worried about his safety in the US and needs the State Department to protect him, why doesn't he head back sooner? Go back to Iran! What are you lingering around here for so many days? Didn't we see him just talking big every day? So here, I tell you, let's all think about it: within this grand game, who currently has the strongest motive to stir up trouble, and who has the capability to pull all these countries and these transnational actors together into a single point through geopolitical influence, networks, and financial support? Ah, we really are right at this critical juncture, right before National Day! This feels so similar to when Empress Dowager Cixi celebrated her 60th birthday and had a garden built specially right before it just to make her smile, right? Ah, you say all those setbacks Xi suffered in the US—I see those fake anti-communist state security and national treasure trolls, the ones together with River Turtle and their ilk, some of those domestic accounts on Twitter getting so pissed off by our show that they say, "Oh, that Lady Wang is spreading lies everywhere, now she's even saying that during the B-2 bomber formation it scared Xi Jinping." They completely failed to notice that everyone clearly saw it was Trump who got scared, Trump arranging it, Trump flashing those white teeth and smiling so happily. As for your Xi, that state, right? Like a deer caught in the headlights, that's the feeling. I said long ago, Xi is just like many kinds of prey; when something happens, he desperately tries to play dead, fake his death, or pretend. "Oh, I've kicked the bucket already, go find someone else, there's already a coup, Xi steps down and Li takes over"—that's just their usual playbook. So I'm saying this bunch of state security and national treasure trolls are also playing dumb while knowing the truth, right? I noticed they still don't dare to mention the narrative and notice from the National Archives that I talked about later, nor do they dare to mention the "recall the bitter past and think of the sweet present" meals. And including this granite issue, they don't even dare to touch it, right? Just poking around a bit, talking about things like the B-2 bomber formation we mentioned? Then they realized it was no good; no matter how much they tried to whitewash it, it couldn't be washed clean, right? So I'll tell you, when you see this, you'll find that—you say, this Fairford Air Force Base is equivalent to what some of our audience and friends said, an attempted Pearl Harbor, right? I think its significance is even greater than Pearl Harbor. And then what? Today's attempted hijacking is equivalent to an attempted 9/11, right? I'm telling you, whether it's Pearl Harbor or 9/11, these happen once every few decades. Over the past nearly a hundred years, aren't these two the most vicious attacks suffered by the US, right? To think someone would dare to put these two together back-to-back at the exact same time point! Hey, I'll say it again: do you think if Iran had such powerful international coordination capabilities, it would have ended up dying out like this? Ah? That Abbas Araghchi and Masoud Pezeshkian are also among the people who understand the situation best, right? Whether you think they are high-ranking officials or advanced black agents, if Iran were really that powerful, would it be scared to death like this now, desperately begging the US to protect it? Desperately selling out the CCP? Saying, "Oh, look, today this customs manifest has come out; the CCP sent so many batches of goods in the past, right? Ah, telling you clearly right here, there are ingredients for gunpowder used as ammunition during the ceasefire period, or these other materials over there, right?" Shouting out on Fox News, saying, "You, the CCP, took my oil, yet you haven't paid me! Where are these hundreds of millions of dollars in your pocket, right? You'll have to pay it back eventually."

So it is plain to see that there is a force trying to stir up the final waves in the Middle East situation—with the US and Israel as a secondary player, and the US as the primary player—right before Iran is about to completely perish. And you will find that, with this kind of playbook, you say there are two terrorist attacks, and yet both terrorist attacks were stopped, stopped at the very last second. That Fairford incident was definitely by the grace of God, and today's incident is even more of a miracle from God. You say, if you claim this was a drill, such a drill could not possibly be staged; who would dare to bet that it would definitely succeed when there are only dozens of seconds left before crashing and perishing?

So these are all God-level probabilities, and everyone witnessed God-level probabilities twice within a week, wow. On one hand, it truly is heaven protecting the free world; on the other hand, what I want to express is, just how panicked is this evil force behind you anyway? Two such incidents actually burst out within the exact same time frame, and all of them were stopped right at the final doorstep, directly with the guillotine blade falling down. So now the investigation has to begin. Will the UK cooperate, and how cooperative will it be? Anyway, since the US was able to stop this matter for you ahead of time, the US has a way to push you to start the investigation. Even if you let that little terrorist go, it doesn't matter; how do you know whether there was a tracking device attached to him when he was released?

And then here you say the Omani co-pilot just happened not to die yet. Look, this guy has already been dragged over. First, if he has any injuries—well, it seems he doesn't have any knife wounds, right? Anyway, keep him alive first, and then interrogate him. Don't underestimate Israel's capability in this regard. And now, fortunately, the captain is also undergoing emergency treatment, but it is said that his vital signs are currently stable. Everyone should pray for him, because he is truly a hero, along with those passengers who turned the tide for the aircraft; they are all heroes, and I will tell everyone all about it in a moment.

Let's talk about investigating what's behind this. Do you think it can't be found out? If these terrorist attacks—let's say one or two of them had succeeded—they would have triggered massive issues, like the US military base, right? Massive military deployment issues, and issues involving casualties, or various diplomatic and social problems caused by this hijacking incident. This tragic effect, maybe even more terrifying than October 7th, would be even more shocking because right under everyone's noses, it might be like 9/11. Hey, and then you'd say it might suddenly lead to insufficient manpower, distraction, and all kinds of disruptions, causing the pursuit of the forces behind it to be delayed. But now that it's an attempted attack, aren't they just bottling up a surge of energy, with the US and Israel joining forces together?

In addition, I ask you, after these things happen, even if the UK is infiltrated, within the UK's national security including its politicians, aristocrats, and royalty, are there really no one who is afraid of death? Didn't they realize that behind this matter lies a devastating crisis for them as well? Including the Gulf countries, whether it's the UAE or Saudi Arabia, looking at this situation, you never know which day, without even knowing how it happened, an airplane would drop on your head. Terrorists emerge endlessly, and can you still continue to sit there thinking, "Oh, I can play both sides, or I still have some conflict with Israel, I shouldn't get close"? Impossible. Those who signed the Abraham Accords will only deepen their cooperation even further, and those who haven't signed the Abraham Accords should basically be lining up by now to rush and join.

So here, I'm saying that launching this kind of attack is definitely a double-edged sword. Winning means you might be flexing your muscles temporarily, just like 9/11, just like Pearl Harbor. But when we talk about strength, comparing strength with the US and Israel, don't even talk about setting up an air force base, blowing up an airplane—you could never truly win in the end. Unless evil forever has the upper hand and this planet is going to perish, right? So like I said, the way you play with this double-edged sword is just like this. Otherwise, why do we say that back then, the Soviet Union, as evil as it was, and as cruel as it was, at least wasn't crazy? And by "not crazy," it implies that before doing things, they used their brains, looked further ahead, and pondered. What kind of effect will this have three days after it's done? What kind of effect in three months? What kind of effect in three years or thirty years? You can't say that you look ahead three days, three months, and after three years you just get wiped out, ceasing to exist in three to five years, just like when Japan launched the attack on Pearl Harbor back then, and immediately within five years atomic bombs appeared, directly bombing Hiroshima. If they had even once thought of this step back then, I believe even if you lent the Emperor several sets of guts, and lent the militarist generals of that era several sets of guts, they still wouldn't dare do this thing, right? So this is madness, and on top of that, their brains aren't very useful, because at that time they clearly didn't expect the US to have such strong high-tech and military strength. That is to say, in a simple sentence, their brains aren't good enough.

So look at this here, let me say this: in this world, being able to coordinate these two battles—these terrorist attacks, can't be called wars, these two terrorist attacks—and targeting precisely the enemies of the Chinese Communist Party, whether it's the US, Israel, or the UAE, well, the UAE definitely treats them as an enemy too. Now that you've smashed my vault, isn't that making you an enemy in my eyes? Your money should have been my money in the first place, and now my money has gone over to your side and become yours and America's. Can the CCP swallow this anger? So really, I say this matter, whether viewed from motivation, capability, or this level of madness and complete disregard for consequences, wow, I really must say the possibility of a National Day tribute gift is very, very high, right?

Of course, we can only say that we are brainstorming right now. But guess what, after we've opened up this line of thought, could it be that it secretly aligns with the investigative directions of the US and Israel? Look, okay, let's talk about this today, let's get into the specific new details. Take the Fairford incident; today, the British Prime Minister Starmer said that the British government has seen strong indications that Iran played a role in this event. The day before yesterday, he wouldn't even admit it, saying it was under investigation. Now it's like looking into a crystal ball, saying I have seen strong indications. Then he said that Starmer was speaking to the BBC, saying that this is a complex and serious police investigation currently underway, in close cooperation with the US, and we will reveal more information at the appropriate time, but we can confirm that Iran played a role in it. He didn't say that Iran was the sole mastermind; he only said Iran played a role.

Didn't I tell everyone yesterday? If it were just Iran, listen, whether it's Rubio's or Trump's rhetoric, is it that simple? If Iran did it, Trump could just open his mouth and say, I have to bomb Iran, I'm going straight for their base, I'll level Tehran. Anyway, it's not the first time Trump has said things like that. If Iran were the sole mastermind at this time, and the CCP had nothing to do with it, or maybe you could say there's a tiny connection, like some financial channels or some weapons transported by the CCP. But assuming the CCP is just an auxiliary, Rubio and Trump wouldn't need to be so subtle, right?

So look, Starmer speaking here, it's very clear that he is in a very passive state. However, his exact words today were also that Iran played a role. He doesn't dare to just say outright that we have investigated and it is Iran, with no one else behind it, that it was just Iran, and so on. He doesn't dare to be that narrow, regarding other countries. Also, it is said that the British police stated that among the three suspicious vehicles, the three vehicles that were supposedly going to bomb the base, a certain amount of gasoline was found, but no improvised explosive devices were found. I think we should maintain a reserved attitude about this matter. Did they really not find any, or is it inconvenient for them to disclose it? Or is there someone trying to suppress and downplay this matter? It's hard to say.

You say these three cars, let's just call them three oil tankers, they don't have explosive devices, they don't have such things. If they were going to attack the Fairford base, do you think it's necessary? They would definitely have to add it in. Think about it, a few months ago we talked about the person related to the Prince Group in Thailand caught by the CCP, wasn't it a car where they found C4 explosives, and then searched his house and found piles and piles of explosives? So you say no suspicious explosive devices were found on these vehicles; is it possible that these cars were driving on the road to go to some cellar, some house, some hole to get explosives? Anyway, the CCP, look, people from the Prince Group can openly hold C4 explosives and the like, so it wouldn't be hard for them to set up some terrorist network in the UK, right?

So the UK side, the US is definitely watching, of course. Hey, we all look at it and feel that the UK side is very worrying. Rest assured, the US is definitely more ruthless than you think. Yes, Hua Chunying has even mentioned 9/11 not being far away. Yes, yes, she has said all these things, like bombing US bases, and letting you see 9/11 again, and something about peace in Japan, she has said all these things. You said the words, but when the event happens, you don't admit it. Let's say if something like that happens, for example, that kind of terrorist attack, like a car ramming into a crowd, wouldn't the first thing be to check who has said such things online, especially those who have spoken publicly?

So, the CCP, let me tell you, on this matter, let's put it this way: they want to wash themselves clean, but with such a big event, you wait, they have to have the life for it, you understand? It's not about having the ability; they can't possibly have the ability. If they did these things behind the scenes, and the mastermind happens to coincide with their National Day, if they really did it, it's impossible for them to wash it clean. And from what we see now, whether it's COVID-19, or their Ghost Month operation, or the 514 recording, or their 093-417 nuclear submarine, or the 'Return' plan, everything they do fails. One effort, then decline, then exhaustion. So, from this perspective, we are still very confident. God does not stand with the crazy authoritarian regime that destroys humanity.

Okay, then look, there isn't much progress on the Fairford incident in the UK. Come, let's look at Israel. After the hijacking, news has come out that Netanyahu has already departed. Today, after Netanyahu met with the hero who saved the plane and gave a public speech, he has already departed, saying he is going to have an emergency security meeting with Trump in person. This wasn't arranged beforehand; it was after the assessment of the Fly Dubai FZ1073 hijacking attempt was completed, and he has already left from the Israeli airport.

They said that Netanyahu would consult on the potential serious consequences this hijacking incident might trigger at the regional level, discuss issues of intelligence coordination, and address the implementation of stricter measures for international flights targeting the Middle East as a whole—all of which are topics they are set to talk about. Now, let's look at the follow-up developments regarding this hijacking that have emerged today, and go over the main details for everyone.

First, there are the passengers. Since the passengers temporarily landed at a military airport in Saudi Arabia at the time—or a dual-use military-civilian one—Israel then sent a plane to pick them up and bring them back. Now all passengers on board have returned to Israel. Here they are surrounded by the media for interviews as they exit the airport. For instance, a passenger described how, at a critical juncture, a group of young people rushed to the front of the cabin within a minute or two—just as the plane was descending violently—and rushed to the front of the cabin. Then, hasn't it been confirmed already? The co-pilot, Amanji, was identified as the terrorist. They quickly went to attack this hijacker Amanji and subdued him. The passenger said he was sitting in the front and saw a group of young people rush over to fight the pilot—or rather the co-pilot. Afterwards, the plane was saved; a backup flight crew took over the plane, it landed in Saudi Arabia, and later returned home.

Then, the Israeli spokesperson immediately told Reuters and the media that, regarding what everyone has been speculating about this morning—that since 9/11, aren't the doors of the cockpit supposed to be locked?—it has now been confirmed that the seriously injured captain, covered in blood, persevered in his moment of critical danger and, using sheer willpower, pressed the button to open the cockpit door—not the cabin door, the cockpit door—and only under this circumstance was someone from the outside able to rush in and subdue the co-pilot. Therefore, when we talk about Hero Number One here, it is definitely this captain. Without him, no matter who was sitting behind him, even if they were secret agents, it would be useless because you couldn't get in.

His identity has now been confirmed. This is what the captain looks like, see? This has already been officially confirmed by Israel. The pilot's name is Smith Michael Michaelcha—because his name is very difficult to pronounce, as he is an Indian captain working as a pilot in Dubai, he is Indian. So this matter has won great international prestige for Indians. Online, people are saying, oh, this Indian pilot is truly amazing, his skills are impressive, his courage is commendable, and he saved not just a plane full of people, but also the chain of disasters that might have been triggered afterwards. He saved all of them, right? This saved 180 lives on a single plane!

And among them, about 170 were Israelis, so the target of this terrorist attack was very obvious. Here is another photo of the captain, sitting in the cockpit previously wearing his captain's uniform. His facial features look very kind and amiable; he has a very benevolent appearance. We truly hope he can pull through safely, and our audience and friends are also praying for him. I believe everyone's prayers will surely be answered, and now everyone is praying for his full recovery. He's amazing, isn't he?

Then, many passengers accepted interviews and continued to describe how, after he was stabbed—after the pilot was stabbed—when he opened the cockpit door, people saw him lying covered in blood on the cockpit floor. Yet even under these conditions, he still managed to open the unlocking mechanism. I don't know whether the unlocking mechanism of this Max 8 plane is right by his hand, or if he had to reach for the door, or how it actually worked. Furthermore, it is said that because there was a backup flight crew on the plane at the time—Israeli officials confirmed why there was a second group of pilots, two pilots, on the plane—it was originally arranged that this captain and his co-pilot would fly it there, and then for the return trip, it was reportedly supposed to be the second group of pilots taking over the mission to fly it back. But because the co-pilot turned out to be a terrorist, under the condition that the captain was seriously injured, the backup pilots directly took over the aircraft. Therefore, according to further data disclosed now, the plane didn't just descend about 5,000 meters within thirty seconds; rather, the plane entered a spinning state at that time. Goodness me, I imagine it was like a piece of paper spinning in the wind. Of course, you mention the spinning state, so in the end after it landed, everyone saw that the tail fin had a chunk shaved off, right? This actually, I estimate, should be...

Well-deserved! This is what they meant by landing in a spinning state; otherwise, if it had been a very smooth landing, it wouldn't seem like the tail fin would end up having a chunk shaved off, right? You feel that under this kind of condition—our understanding of aviation is limited, right?—our purpose wasn't that deep either, and we couldn't figure out exactly what kind of state it must have been in at the time. But you can imagine that for such a large plane to have a missing chunk on its tail fin, it must have been caused by huge resistance and other factors, including various air currents being affected during the ascent and descent process, right? Only then could such damage be caused.

And, and, look at that missing piece of the tail when the plane landed—my god! You, you making a movie, you really wouldn't dare to film it like that. I think if you were making a movie and said, 'Hey, I'm going to find a consultant,' I'm telling you, whether you find a consultant who was a pilot or one who was an intelligence officer, nine out of ten wouldn't dare let you write it that way. They'd say, 'Hey, if I'm going to be your consultant, you have to make this movie believable, right? If you write that in the last thirty seconds it dropped five thousand meters, then there was a struggle, then it went back up, and just then someone subdued them, and just then the captain opened the cockpit door, and then when it landed they found a piece of the tail missing—if you write it like that, I can't afford the embarrassment.' Seriously, I'm telling you, if the story hadn't actually happened, right? Of course, in the future, a fantastic movie will definitely be made about this. But before it happened, really, no one would dare write it like that, ah.

And then, it's said that Israel has confirmed it; Israel's Minister of Defense Katz has publicly stated that this was a terrorist attack, a failed jihadist terrorist attack, not something like, you know, a dispute between two people, a scuffle, or anything else. The co-pilot is now in Israeli hands, anyway. It's said the co-pilot was first interrogated in Saudi Arabia, but I believe Israel will find a way to get him over for interrogation. Although they don't have formal diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia right now, and theoretically, there shouldn't be extradition, right? But with such a huge incident, I believe that if Saudi Arabia can't hand this person over to Israel due to various legal reasons, Netanyahu will definitely bring this up when he meets Trump this time. He'll say, 'How can we, with the help of the United States, get this terrorist over here for interrogation?' They will definitely talk about it, understand?

Alright, and then in this, actually, look, let's show you another hero, right? Actually, there's no particular order of ranking, because if we say the captain is number one, then this hero—if we call him number two, it's actually a bit unfair, you know? Let's just call them tied for first, because this is the hero who reacted in the first instance, rushed to the front, and directly subdued the co-pilot with his bare hands! And after returning to Israel, Netanyahu met him immediately, and it's so interesting! His conversation with Netanyahu—there are English subtitles added below, it's really interesting! What was this one-minute conversation about? It's that when Netanyahu saw him, he expressed great excitement, and he said, this person was very generous, hey, completely without that, for example, being inarticulate or, you know, being shy or anything, not at all! This hero, he came to meet Netanyahu, because by then the whole incident had passed for over ten hours, so you see his Israeli wife and two daughters also attended this meeting, and he introduced them to Netanyahu. But when he met Netanyahu, the first thing he said was: 'Oh, Netanyahu said welcome to you.' And he said, 'He said, oh, let me first apologize for my situation. Look, the clothes I'm wearing, I didn't have time to change, because, I told them at least ten times to give me my suitcase so I could change into clean clothes. But they couldn't get me that suitcase, so I had to wear these dirty clothes to meet you.' Then Netanyahu asked, 'Whose blood is this?' This blood, it was the captain's. This hero said that after he subdued the co-pilot at the time, he actually wanted to save the captain. But, he said, 'Oh, unfortunately, I wanted to resuscitate him, but I couldn't do it. But fortunately, he is now in the hospital for emergency treatment, right?'

Then Netanyahu said, "Wow, how did you think of doing this? It's amazing!" Then this hero, quite generously—his name is Yaniv, I'm not sure how to pronounce it, probably Yaniv Black Shadow if I didn't mispronounce it, right? His name is hard to spell out anyway—he is an Israeli. This Israeli hero directly said: "He said, 'Because we are people from the land of the lions.'" Hey, as we mentioned before, that Israeli operation was something like the lion's rise, Operation Lion's Roar, right? I told you this allusion back then, the whole lion statue and the lion allusion, so he said, because we are people from the land of the lions. Then Netanyahu immediately said, "Yes, looking at you, I feel like a lion is standing in front of me." Then Netanyahu said, "Come, come, come, sit down, tell me what actually happened, right?" You know Netanyahu is also a veteran of many battles, but when he heard the details told by him later, Netanyahu was like, "Wow, that's amazing, that's fantastic," that kind of feeling. Then this hero who subdued the hijacker told him, "I was sitting in the front row, and suddenly I saw the cabin lights go dark. Then I saw screams coming from the front, the cockpit door opened, and there was a fight inside, so I rushed over."

And then, they said after he rushed over, he knew he had to do something, so he rushed directly into the cockpit and physically wrestled with the co-pilot. Moreover, wasn't it the co-pilot who had already stabbed the captain, leaving the captain collapsed on the ground? At that time, the plane was in the middle of a descent, and this hero directly put the co-pilot in a chokehold from behind! There are descriptions online saying he locked the co-pilot's neck and literally dragged the co-pilot out of the cockpit.

And at this time, other people also rushed over to help subdue the co-pilot, and after that, it was still this hero who was the first to return to the cockpit. Although I just said there were two backup pilots on the plane, those two backup pilots, according to various channels including passenger accounts—I don't think it was their fault, they were just normal people—in such a short time, those two pilots didn't react. A passenger told the media that at the time, there were two other pilots sitting in the back of the cabin, originally scheduled to perform the return flight mission. But in the emergency, according to passenger descriptions, both pilots froze, just like being frozen solid. When described, it was said they were "frozen," like frozen stiff and unresponsive. Then this passenger who was interviewed later told the media that while you could see the hero up front fighting the co-pilot and trying to control the plane to prevent it from crashing, the two pilots in the back were already frozen and actually required this passenger to go over and shake them, saying, "Hurry up and move, hurry up and go to the front to take over the plane." Because the plane was still in a dive at that time, and since it was in the process of going down, this hero—it's said there was no mention of him having any military flight experience, no mention of him having any previous experience flying planes—so at that time, although he might have been able to urgently pull back on the control stick or something, you still needed professional pilots to stabilize the emergency and recover the aircraft. So at that moment, oh, the Israeli passenger immediately shook the pilot awake, and those two pilots quickly rushed to the front, saying one of them reacted faster, rushed over, and helped take over, directly taking control of the plane. As for the other pilot, the other one in the second group, actually didn't recover right away; it took him a much longer time to react before he went over to help out.

Do you see that? Let me tell you, those two pilots were definitely not just sitting there on purpose. But look, pilots, airplane pilots, generally have much faster reactions than us ordinary people, including muscle reflexes; they are definitely better. Think about it, during their flight training, they must be trained on how not to panic if an emergency occurs, right? How to react? Their psychological resilience is definitely better than the average person's, isn't it? Yet, in this situation, both of the backup pilots were frozen there. If it weren't for the hero in the front fighting, I suspect these two might not have recovered from that frozen state even until the plane crashed, right? Oh my, so you see, these details here, look, even as we talk about it now, it's heart-pounding and thrilling. Then, let's talk about when the pilot who woke up first entered the cockpit to take over control. Since the hero was pulling the steering wheel at the time, pulling it back to level out the diving plane, after the pilot behind came to take over, the hero left the cockpit and watched the co-pilot with others, you know, to prevent the co-pilot from causing more trouble, right? Just like in movies sometimes, you never know what the villain might do until the very last moment. And I think they also kept him alive on purpose, right? Keeping him alive there, otherwise, if the co-pilot had been killed by them, then this whole thing could have become a case of 'denial until death,' right? Anyway, this whole thing, it's just, oh my, I find it hard to believe!

And by the way, there was actually another hero involved, a dentist. He was also a passenger in the front row. Because at that moment, besides the hero who rushed over immediately, this dentist—who looks quite cute, by the way—also rushed over to help subdue the co-pilot. And in the process, since he was a dentist, he also provided emergency medical treatment to the captain who was bleeding heavily. It's all there, look, it's very bloody, right? Helping him put on an oxygen mask and so on, so this is also very impressive. This dentist is also an Israeli, named Santa Musayavi, if I mispronounced it, uh, sorry, it's an Israeli name, anyway. These are all heroes, right? We're saying, look, even when the pilots were able to freeze, these few heroes rushed up immediately. Especially when you think about it, the plane was in a dive at that time. I'm not talking about anything else, like aircraft piloting or technical skills, I don't understand that. If Qiao Shi could talk about it on Lude's show tonight, that would be great. After all, our guest Qiao Shi understands piloting, right?

Let's just talk about a purely medical issue. This entire rapid descent, even reaching a speed close to supersonic, right? The data is all online. And then, in the process of pulling up immediately, let me put it this way: people who haven't undergone professional training like air force pilots are actually very prone to insufficient blood flow to the brain due to gravity during the entire G-force process. In this situation, you said the pilot had already shown this freezing phenomenon; that freezing is actually a physiological phenomenon, you understand? Because it's too extreme, your body and mind simply cannot react. Even if you train normally, it's very hard to overcome. But these heroes actually overcame this situation. And didn't I just say? Let's talk about medicine, specifically aviation medicine, there is a condition called G-force induced loss of consciousness, usually abbreviated as GLOC, that is, G L O C.

What does this mean? It means, look, if we are in a situation without gravity, you say, well, that's a feeling of weightlessness, right? Now, if we say under the condition of two G's, your body is essentially subjected to twice its weight. In that process, we say, during the aircraft's transition from a dive to a pull-up, if it reaches 3G's or an even greater state, the higher the G-force, the harder it is for your heart to pump blood up to your brain. That means your brain suffers from relative ischemia, and blood perfusion cannot reach it, right? So in this situation, why is it that fighter pilots all have to undergo 4G, 5G, 6G, or even higher G-force training? If an ordinary person experiences G-forces to that extent, it's not a matter of saying, "Oh, I have the willpower to overcome it"; basically, you first start to notice that your field of vision is getting smaller and smaller, then your vision starts turning gray, then it turns black, and then you pass out, understand? It's equivalent to your brain simply unable to function anymore! Now, in this situation, even if you wanted to fight back, I'm telling you, you wouldn't be able to react at all, right? So in this process, you see, aside from the fact that descending is very dangerous, maintaining consciousness during the ascent while pulling the diving aircraft back up is also extremely, extremely difficult. Because as I just mentioned, GLOC mainly happens during that pull-up phase, understand? So at this point,

throughout this entire process, let's just say there isn't a single moment that allows you to let out a sigh of relief, is that the state of things? So here, the reports from the Israeli side specifically emphasized afterwards whether or not this Israeli hero belonging to Netanyahu was described as having a certain background, but they did state that this hero had no security experience—meaning he didn't come from a professional security background before. But having said that, let's look at this: could it be possible?

If Israel is like what we see in shows about Mossad intelligence like *Fauda* or *Tehran*, let's just use our imagination, could it really be possible that he is a professionally trained operative? But in my opinion, given his reaction, it's not something you get just by doing a bit of compulsory military service or serving as a soldier for two years. Think about it, everyone who participated in compulsory service during the October 7 massacre—

how many Israeli soldiers were killed precisely because of insufficient training or slow reactions, failing to respond at all at that moment, and furthermore, their combat capability was inadequate, plus many of them probably didn't react in time? Later on, reports came out saying that when the terrorists broke into the military base, a female soldier protected many people because a lot of the others didn't react at all, and some didn't even understand what was happening at the very moment they were killed.

So is there a possibility? Let's just use our imagination: he actually received intelligence beforehand, but wasn't certain which flight would be targeted, so this plainclothes operative and agent was sitting on board, and when the incident broke out, he rushed forward at a critical moment to save the day. As a result, because his identity had to be exposed, they had to tell the outside world that he had no security experience. Because didn't we tell you before? Many people in Shin Bet and Mossad cannot reveal their identities even after sacrificing their lives, because their families would face retaliation, right? Of course,

regardless of how it happened, the reason we are making this speculation is that it is too hard to imagine an ordinary person being able to do all these things under those circumstances. You could say the dentist was helping out from behind, right? Including assisting with the rescue later on, that's understandable. You could say the pilot rushing forward from the back row to take over the aircraft is also understandable. But throughout the entire process, while the captain was incapacitated, this main character, this hero, was handling everything inside and out. Hey, I'll ask everyone: just think about that crazy co-pilot, holding a knife in his hand and operating the aircraft with vicious intent.

I look at this hero, and he doesn't look physically strong enough to subdue the co-pilot. When you look at him, don't you feel that he isn't built like someone extremely strong, like a U.S. special operations soldier? He just feels like he has an ordinary build, right? How did he have such formidable strength? And this sort of thing relies on specific techniques; it's not just a matter of having great strength to subdue such people. Look at this terrorist co-pilot,

in a state where his eyes are already bloodshot and desperate, seeing that he is about to succeed. I'm telling you, if you've ever seen psychiatric patients in a mental hospital, you would understand why nurses in psychiatric facilities usually have to be very alert to such patients acting up. And if a patient has an episode, it usually takes several able-bodied nurses to go up and subdue him, and it's still common for nurses to suffer severe injuries from sudden attacks by psychiatric patients. Because in that kind of state, like a terrorist going wild at the end, it's just like that psychiatric state. And I suspect—I seriously suspect—that the co-pilot might have used drugs.

As we’ve discussed before, right? Before Hamas carried out those massacres, they used those hallucinogens and stimulants specifically to boost their energy, making them feel like they had endless stamina, and trapping them in a state intertwined between reality and illusion, where they thoroughly enjoyed the process and were in a wild frenzy. The explosive strength of someone in this state is far, far, far greater than that of a normal person. And then look, this hero managed to—

Dragging the guy out of the cockpit by his neck, subduing him together with others outside, and then heading back in. In that emergency situation, he pulled the control stick to stop the plane from continuing to descend. And then once someone else took over, he went back out to keep subduing the co-pilot. Oh my goodness, no matter how you think about it, it feels completely, utterly, totally unbelievable! May this good man be blessed with peace and safety for a lifetime! He is truly amazing, isn't he?

Alright, and then here, Netanyahu made a public characterization of this incident before departing for the United States. Netanyahu made a public statement saying that this morning, a serious security incident occurred on a flight from Dubai to Israel, and almost all the passengers on board were Israelis. During the flight, as the aircraft approached Israel, one of the pilots stabbed another pilot and apparently attempted to crash the plane along with everyone on board. He said he spoke with an Israeli passenger who told him the plane went into a spin and began to dive.

Through some unknown means, he and a crew member managed to break into the cockpit. As that hero said, while the pilot who carried out the stabbing was attempting to sabotage the aircraft systems, they subdued him together. Then another group of flight crew subsequently entered the cockpit and successfully stabilized the plane. Anyway, there are some minor discrepancies between these details and the eyewitness accounts, which I suppose might be due to different viewing angles. But regardless, right? This matter.

The basic details are pretty much as I just described—it's so incredible! Incredible. And paying tribute to these heroes, they showed extraordinary resourcefulness and courage, saving many lives and preventing a major disaster. They finally landed safely at Saudi Arabia's airport called Tabuk. And it said all passengers were out of danger and transferred back to Israel. The injured pilot is receiving medical treatment, and the terrorist has been arrested and is currently still in Saudi hands.

And here, Israel, some different officials also explicitly stated in interviews that a 9/11-style attack was thwarted. And there is another interesting detail here that I'd like to share with you all. Because Saudi Arabia and Israel do not have diplomatic relations, when this flight was temporarily landed at this Saudi airport, Saudi Arabia actually did not allow Israel to directly send a flight over for rescue. You couldn't fly over because I don't have diplomatic relations with you, and you can't land at my airport. So at that time, the UAE arranged another plane to fly to Saudi Arabia and send these Israelis back.

And then? During this process, actually, the official account of Israel's War Room told everyone—Mossad, do you know how cautious they are? Mossad thoroughly vetted the entire crew of the plane sent by Dubai, meaning the UAE, to bring the passengers back to Israel, terrified that what the terrorists failed to accomplish on the first flight—just in case, since you say my Israeli planes couldn't fly over directly to bring people back—what if terrorists sneaked into the second plane sent by Saudi Arabia? What would they do?

Ah, so why did it take some time waiting back then? Because during this process, Mossad quickly conducted a security check on the crew members of the newly arrived plane that came to help, determined that yes, we can trust these people and let them come pick up our people, and then transferred this batch of passengers back to Israel. Oh wow, speaking of this, we also have to mention, as I just said, could this be a National Day gift to the regime? Hey, let's say, if it were a National Day gift, you know what the CCP's tradition is, right? Eating ten for one, right? Extremely greedy.

So, speaking of this, we have to mention it again. If this 737 MAX 8 had suffered this serious crash, assuming it hadn't been saved, besides a terrorist attack, could it be possible? You tell me?

Immediately, the cognitive warfare would start rolling out, while other drafts were being prepared. They would say the 737 is always experiencing diving accidents—crashing in Kunming in a dive today, and crashing in a dive in Saudi Arabia or Israel tomorrow, and anyway, the people on board wouldn't be able to speak out by then anyway. Finding the black boxes would require further research, and general black box research and decryption always take more than two years, right? Like that China Eastern plane in Kunming, it was never decrypted for you at all, and in the end, whatever they said was just a matter of the CCP opening its mouth, so under these circumstances.

Let me tell you, we must be on guard; the reputation of broadcasting will be severely damaged! Hey, you ask why I have this thought? First of all, let me show you, what is something very infuriating? Let's first look at the media's reaction to this hijacking incident, okay? This hijacking incident, an attempted terrorist attack, there's no doubt about that, right? Okay, look, first of all, what was the reaction from Iran? The official Israeli account posted it—it was that Rezai, whom the CCP couldn't wait to have their ambassador meet as soon as he took office. They said that the hardliners in Iran are now number one, right? Rezai, who has an excellent relationship with the CCP, directly tweeted, saying.

Just as allowing U.S. military bases to be stationed there has not brought you security, hosting the so-called "butchers of the cassock"—that is what they call Israel, "butchers of the cassock"—will not bring you any good results either. Learn from the last war, stop provoking wars, and stop making baseless claims against Iran. With this statement, although he did not explicitly claim responsibility for the incident, his implication is: Look, you in the UAE, you are friendly with Israel, and now you've been dragged into this, right? If you aren't good to my Iran, you will face retribution. At the very least, he is partially claiming it.

And then, there is all sorts of disgusting content in these Telegram groups, for example, these terrorists, the terrorists of the Revolutionary Guard, celebrating and saying, look at this plane, right? Although it didn't crash, the tail was damaged, and then they applauded and liked it. This was the bloody image inside the cabin at the time. Okay, under these circumstances, how did the major mainstream media report it?

Let me show you a compilation! Official Israeli accounts are tearing them apart. What did The New York Times say? The New York Times said, "Breaking News: Israeli officials say a plane flying from Dubai to Israel was diverted due to an altercation between the captain and the co-pilot." "Altercation" and "conflict" were the original words they used. What kind of word is this "altercation" that The New York Times used?

Actually, a more accurate translation would be a verbal spat or a dispute, like "picking a quarrel and provoking trouble," or a physical conflict arising from a verbal argument; it is a legal term, you understand? But this word is biased toward the negative, meaning that these two pilots were unseemly, started making a scene in public, were uncivilized, and got into a fight. Why should the captain have to bear this derogatory label? He is a hero! And was that terrorist just a case of someone being unseemly, uncivilized, and picking a quarrel?

Ah! The New York Times actually published this directly. And you might not know that after The New York Times released this headline, they were also heavily promoting their report on the internet, on Twitter and such, saying you can see more content from our report. Then, Twitter users directly refuted them there, so Grok, the Twitter AI, said, this was not a pilot conflict; this was the co-pilot stabbing the captain and attempting to take control of the plane. The passengers were mostly Israeli citizens, including dozens of children, and in the end, the passengers forcibly subdued this terrorist. That's the implication.

As a result, look at this: The New York Times' PR department actually responded, saying, "Our headlines and real-time reporting contain all the facts we can confirm as we verify them. Unlike activists and partisans, we do not publish speculation or unverified information. You can learn more as our reporting updates." Wow, this is heinous and disgusting! Then the Israeli War Room directly tore into them, saying, "A reminder to everyone: The New York Times is currently being sued by shareholders for damaging its own credibility."

So you say The New York Times is scolding me; isn't that just them slandering and attacking me? That is my greatest honor! Ah, ah! And then you say they praise someone like Teacher Li, praise that person named Guan Heng who smuggled himself in and claimed to have filmed concentration camps in Xinjiang, praise this and that so-called anti-communist figure—then you know what kind of trash they are, right? And in this process, besides The New York Times, it's not just The New York Times. The BBC, oh, an old friend, an old friend of our program. How did the BBC report this? They said, "After a fight broke out between the pilots."

Ah! Then a flight to Israel was forced to divert. Wow, it almost crashed, an attempted terrorist attack, and they don't mention any of that; just a pilot fight, and then it was just a forced diversion! He can actually say that. And over here, Al Jazeera, well, they are pro-Pakistan or something anyway. How did Al Jazeera put it? They said, "A passenger plane flying to Dubai, flying to Israel, was forced to make an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia after an apparent conflict between two pilots."

Oh, it's still not over! What did CNN say about this? They said violence broke out between two pilots, using that word altercation—a violent argument or fight that caused a flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv to divert to Saudi Arabia. They specifically mentioned that sources leaked this to CNN, and it's just a diversion; this is already completely and utterly disconnected from anything like hijacking.

It's not over, there's more. There's also this—they summarized it, like AFP said, two pilots reportedly fought on a plane they were flying from Dubai to Tel Aviv, both were injured, and therefore made an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia. Just listen, listen to this wording. And what did the Wall Street Journal say? They said a flight to Israel suffered an apparent struggle in the cockpit, leading to both pilots being injured and a forced emergency landing. Hey, they make it sound as if the other pilot was just trying to get the plane to land safely.

And then there's Sky News. Hey, Sky News is also hilarious. Sky News should be in the same group as Fox. Sky News said a flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv landed safely in Saudi Arabia after a fight broke out between the pilots. Then, for instance, the Wall Street Journal used another word, cockpit, uh-uh, cockpit, cockpit fight.

Look at the word they used. Israel's Wall Room directly said, hey, let me help you rewrite this word, I've fixed it for you. What do you mean there was a cockpit, uh-uh, cockpit fight, a fight breaking out? No, it was the co-pilot trying to hijack the plane, and then passengers intervened to prevent a civilian-laden plane from crashing. Do you guys know what the original phrase cockpit fight used in the Wall Street Journal actually means? It sounds even worse than altercation, which I mentioned just now. Does cock mean attack?

This word cockpit, actually, it can be this whole word, you can say it's the aircraft cockpit, right? You can say cockpit fight means a fight happening inside the cockpit. But actually, cock itself means chicken, a rooster. The term for cockfighting is cockfight. So look at this, putting these words together as cockpit fight actually insinuates that a fight broke out inside your cockpit like two roosters fighting until their eyes turned red, just like a cockfight.

Oh my god! This instantly whitewashed a terrorist attack while completely smearing the heroic captain. Isn't that disgusting? You tell me, this kind of tactic is just like when Mr. Lude and I exposed the truth about the virus, and they insisted on tying us together with Guo Wengui, saying we are Guo Wengui's puppets, and packaging us under Guo Wengui's instructions—isn't it the exact same tactic? Right? So truly, the disgust these mainstream media outlets cause me is just...

You want to see how, on this matter, they are so uniformly downplaying this terrorist attack? Remember before I talked about 9/11, Canada specifically even issued a request saying we cannot report 9/11 as a terrorist attack. Later, after it was directly pointed out by the U.S. and this matter was exposed, they had to change their tune. It feels like today's incident is the same thing.

Behind these mainstream media outlets, do you know that basically all of them are pro-CCP? Right? Even if they aren't thoroughly pro-CCP, they have been heavily infiltrated. Right away, they immediately wanted to modify the narrative of this event. Hey, speaking of which, didn't I just mention? If this hijacking had succeeded, even if it ultimately just crashed, then think about it from Boeing's perspective, right? Boeing previously had a nose-dive crash with China Eastern, and this time there's another nose-dive crash happening in the Middle East. Then what actually happened inside, the CCP won't say, and the accident investigation here will take time. Under that circumstance, just think, even an incident like a hijacking can be...

blatantly distorted like this—when the time comes, if they want to throw dirt on Boeing, wouldn't it be even easier? Ah, as the saying goes, killing a duck ten different ways, can they play this game again? You know, if something happens to Boeing, then from a competitive standpoint, right? Do you remember Trump hosting Xi? Before this Xi-Trump summit, a lot of these pro-CCP media outlets were saying, oh, this trip is definitely going to be about selling Boeing airplanes, blah blah blah. Trump cares a lot about Boeing airplanes. Later on, if they use all sorts of sources, fake news, and media blatantly lying to suppress the reputation of such a good 737 airplane...

and beat them down, well indeed, as we say, competitors can benefit. For example, their competitor, let's say, will Airbus benefit? Airbus definitely will. But can you say Airbus orchestrated this behind the scenes? Well, I don't think it goes that far. However, because of the impact of US-China relations, Boeing suffers within mainland China's market and everything else, and the entire mainland China still treats it as a pawn, right? At the drop of a hat, they buy Boeing planes and then return them.

Airbus isn't involved; Airbus is a European aircraft manufacturer. Therefore, Airbus has actually already expanded its status in the CCP-ruled China. In this process, the CCP itself knows how its C919 is performing, so it needs Airbus even more. It is taking this opportunity to suppress Boeing first—anyway, Airbus is more dependent on the CCP than Boeing is. Besides, isn't it still boasting about its C919 everywhere now? Although the C919 is as terrible as it gets, if Boeing is suppressed, Airbus cannot dominate the market alone; there must be competitors. In this process, can't the C919 open up more pathways? It can immediately continue to promote its C919, right? Look, 'Oh, you can't blindly trust Western aircraft; the domestic C919 represents our future.' Moreover, Airbus and Boeing are competitors; if Boeing is gone, Airbus alone won't work. Also, those European companies are particularly keen on political correctness, right? To avoid Airbus monopolizing the market, they would have to say, 'We welcome the C919.' Isn't that so? So in this process, look.

It has suppressed Boeing, one of the pillar industries of the United States, and cleverly shifted this market into the hands of the CCP. Furthermore, all the geopolitical factors are aligned, and the blow to the anti-CCP, pro-freedom nations and the U.S. alliance is also effective. Social factors have been stirred up as well, and so on. My God! They can even say, 'Who told the U.S. to attack Iran? Who told Israel to commit genocide in Gaza?' 'If you hadn't done that, how could there be people who couldn't stand the oppression and rose up to resist?' 'Once they resist, you have to go back and reflect on yourselves.' All of this is coming down like a landslide. Think about it, with such clear facts, personnel.

They are still alive and can still speak to the outside world, right? The eyewitnesses are still there, and even a hijacking with the culprit caught red-handed can be uniformly portrayed as a forced landing and a forced diversion. It is really hard to imagine how terrifying the subsequent public opinion war will be if they succeed! So, no wonder Netanyahu had to rush to the U.S. to discuss this matter; it is definitely a major event! Speaking of this, I think we need to find time to talk more about Israel, because Israel.

Recently, it has been tirelessly fighting Hamas. Does everyone remember when Hamas kidnapped a hostage from a music festival on October 7th? That girl was of mixed Chinese and Israeli heritage. Her boyfriend seemed to have been shot and killed, and she was tied to a motorcycle and taken to the Gaza Strip to be hidden. Her mother was in the late stages of cancer at the time—she was Chinese—and requested help from the Chinese embassy, but the Chinese embassy ignored her. Finally.

Fortunately, the girl was eventually rescued. When she was rescued and reunited with her mother, it wasn't the case that her mother passed away in regret without seeing her. No. The Hamas killer who kidnapped that girl was recently confirmed to have been killed and eliminated by Israel. This means, look, Israel is not stopping. If you say there is no Israel pursuing these terrorists, and you want to play with 'universal love' with them? Then the whole world wouldn't even know how they died. I say.

Alright, speaking of this, there is an interesting matter we need to discuss: North Korea. Don't think that things have been peaceful these past few days; they haven't. Look, first of all, regarding North Korea, President Trump, I believe it was yesterday or the day before, when asked by reporters about North Korea possessing nuclear weapons, he was asked how he views this. Trump said at the time.

Because you had a different president back then—referring to Biden—saying that they could have prevented them from having nuclear weapons, but they didn't do it. But Kim Jong Un happens to be a friend of mine. He is my friend; he likes Trump, and he doesn't like many other people. I am almost the only person in the whole world that he likes, and I like him too. Trump's words are very interesting.

First of all, in Trump's words, this excludes Xi Jinping, right? Xi Jinping has always felt that his relationship with Kim Jong Un should be the best; at least those children in Kim Jong Un's pocket are in his hands, right? Those few who haven't been born yet, and that poor princess born at home, are all in Xi's hands. But Trump said he doesn't like many people; I am almost the only person in the world he likes. And there is another interesting point: does Kim Jong Un like Putin?

I have told you before that Kim Jong Un's embrace of Putin is genuine, but his internal vigilance is also genuine. After all, there is a history of blood and tears between North Korea and Russia where they were betrayed by each other, right? So I told everyone, Kim Jong Un hugging Putin's thigh is one thing, but on the other hand, he is definitely going to use the biggest card in his hand. As far as we can see, that is the nuclear card—the card that the CCP helped him develop nuclear weapons.

To establish that direct communication channel with Trump personally, and during this process, he doesn't even need to rely on Russia, let alone let China and South Korea intervene, because once they intervene, things get huge. So you see, we all have to take what Trump says—whether he likes it or not—with a grain of salt. But right at this moment, hey, over here, North Korea.

They haven't stopped, what are they playing at? Look at The Wall Street Journal reporting these past couple of days that North Korea is actually making a big show of testing drones and missile-coordinated swarm attack tactics. Listen, listen, listen, if this wasn't provided by the Chinese Communist Party, would you believe it? The Chinese Communist Party is supplying this all over the world. Selling drones to Ukraine with one hand and to Russia with the other, right? And then drones are supposed to launch swarm attacks on US soil—this is what we were talking about two or three years ago.

And now North Korea, right? Having nothing at all, suddenly Pyongyang started carrying out coordinated drills this month targeting single targets with collective attack-style drones, this nuclear-strike-capable missile, rocket launcher, and long-range artillery integrated exercise. And they say such tactics are now widely used in Ukraine and Middle East conflicts, and Iran has also used them to attack US military bases and other Gulf countries, right?

Well, you see, North Korea reported and admitted to doing this itself, coupled with the fact that it previously launched some new missiles and whatnot, anyway, it makes you feel that it's unsafe here.

Right? So now The Wall Street Journal says that this move—look, in February of this year, Kim Jong Un held a meeting to determine the future five-year goals for their Korean military. Kim Jong Un promised to develop new AI-driven drone attack systems. And they say that if a conflict breaks out, South Korea's air defense system will be profoundly affected, right? You exhaust ammunition stockpiles, and then you can also create more powerful breakthroughs, and so on. They ask how South Korea should defend itself if it suffers this kind of attack in the future, right?

And then over here, it says that Rami Kim, the chair of Korean studies at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said that North Korea's expanding drone capabilities, combined with its nuclear and missile arsenals, could fundamentally change the military balance on the Korean Peninsula. To put it bluntly, the Chinese Communist Party is exporting its swarm tactics everywhere. Drones cannot fly in Beijing, you can't even own one, but they must be everywhere else in the world. Xi's petty calculations are truly unmatched, right? Well, why did North Korea make such a big show of drilling it?

Oh, you think about it, how much have we told you all? Kim the Third is now clearly showing off a lot of the military value he learned from the CCP and was secretly transmitted and taught to him by the CCP, just to display it to you all, and then raise his own value, while also raising the value of his meeting gift, right? Throwing a wink and making eyes at the US across the air, hurry up and come over here! Besides nuclear weapons, I also have these drones, and I can give all the things the CCP gave me.

Hand them over to you, America, as long as you negotiate with me, right? Oh, destroy the CCP together with me, and a lot of follow-up things will be easy to talk about. I, Kim Jong Un, am willing to cooperate with you, America. Why do I say this? Look, this drone drill is equivalent to releasing it for the whole world to see.

And it lets everyone see this drone, oh, it really is a huge hidden danger, very worrying, and it highlights the importance and necessity of having to talk to North Korea as soon as possible, and having someone with real power talk to him, someone who can make Kim Jong Un submit, right? This also raises Trump's value, because Kim Jong Un's sister Kim Yo Jong spoke on his behalf, and they both said, I don't care about others, but Kim Jong Un truly misses the situation of his last meeting with Trump, right? Look at how this coordination is played out.

And then? What's interesting? Is the US really that scared of him? Huh? Look, the report says around September 20, right, they carried out drone exercises there and exposed it. Then, a few days later, the New York Post directly published an article saying the US military is spending 500 million dollars to build combat-ready laser weapons, and experts say they are already being used in Iran and the US-Mexico border to shoot down drones.

Hey, look at that, you put these points together, and see if these reports echo each other miraculously? Huh, what does it say here? It says recently, Iranian citizens witnessed some dazzling laser displays, but this isn't like a concert or music festival because the US military has been deploying laser weapons in the Strait of Hormuz. Recently, the Department of War confirmed that these laser weapons were used to shoot down drones and incoming cruise missiles, and their cost is far lower than more expensive kinetic weapons like missiles. It says here that the US plan to develop weapons using laser energy has been around for fifty years now.

Now the capability exceeds similar technology possessed by any military on Earth. This picture, this red picture, what does it mean? The caption below says this is a laser weapon, saying this kind can be used for blinding, called dazzlers. They are currently being used in the Middle East to disable drone optical systems. And this picture is not a PPT; this picture is provided by the US Navy.

Then, the president of a directed-energy consulting firm that works with the U.S. military told the New York Post that we can track and lock onto drones with great precision, then accurately direct a laser spot onto the desired location, causing its sensors to fail or destroying the drone outright, making it explode. The way laser technology works is by first drawing energy from an engine or battery pack, then converting it into photons, which are light particles. These are now concentrated into a single laser beam. This beam can only be seen under infrared imaging equipment and is invisible to the naked eye.

He continued by explaining that this will continuously heat the surface of the target until it explodes or melts. An editor for a newsletter called "Laser Wars" then said that this is effectively the weaponization of light; as long as you can dwell on the target for a few seconds—the term used is "dwell time"—you can ultimately shoot it down. The editor added that these systems are now truly coming out of the lab and being deployed in real-world environments, which is very significant. The most important development is that the U.S. Army has approved a $500 million contract to manufacture actual laser weapons suitable for direct use in warfare. He said these lasers concentrate photons onto a target, producing catastrophic and destructive effects. Pretty impressive, right?

What is even more interesting? The reporter said it was quite a surprise! Do you know how these laser weapons are operated? Do any of our viewers play video games? Anyone play Xbox? Soldiers operate these new laser weapons using reconfigured Xbox game controllers. They use these game controllers because experts studying directed-energy weapons have said that the video game industry has already figured out what kind of joystick controllers work best. The U.S. military's logic is: since the gaming industry has already figured out what kind of joysticks are effective, why should we spend money to develop a different control system? Just use the Xbox controllers that everyone is already used to, or something similar, and the mission will be accomplished.

Look, this image was also provided by the U.S. military; it shows a bright red laser beam firing from a ground installation into the night sky to destroy an enemy target. This isn't even visible to the naked eye. There is another image attached below; do you see it? What is this image? It shows a laser weapon firing from a U.S. warship. This is what the laser weapon looks like, firing from a cruiser. These weapon systems represent the direction of future warfare. There are some other images as well, let me check. Oh, right, this is the equipment, and below that is a detailed illustration of the entire system's components, all provided by the U.S. Navy. This is a new type of weapon that is now being made public. It is mentioned here that if you have played games like Halo, those video games feature similar laser-based cutting-edge weapons, except the U.S. military is now applying them in actual combat.

It is specifically mentioned that this laser technology has made great strides in recent years, thanks to the drug cartels in Mexico. The Joint Task Force on the southern border has been using the U.S.-Mexico border to test these new technologies. Take those drug traffickers and terrorists—why call them terrorists? If you shoot down or injure a terrorist, do you not need to be held accountable? Not to mention the terrorists' drones. According to the information released so far, at least eleven drones have been successfully shot down in demonstrations at the U.S.-Mexico border. Therefore, a researcher from the U.S. Foreign Policy Council specifically told the New York Post that being able to use this to eliminate the threat from drug cartels is truly a good thing and seems quite effective. He said that shooting down all drones with lasers is no longer just a dream.

It is also mentioned here that, of course, they walked back their statements a bit, saying that the currently deployed systems are not used to attack human targets, but are only used to attack these unmanned systems. But if you think about the future, is there a possibility of using them to directly attack enemy troops? There is certainly that potential, they just aren't saying it. He said that solid-state lasers have very few moving mechanical parts, and as long as they are supplied with enough energy, they can become excellent defense systems. Theoretically, you don't even need to worry about ammunition reserves anymore, which could significantly change military logistics. So, I say, the CCP is still staring at whether the U.S. has enough Patriot missiles? They really know so little; it is as if the U.S. already has aircraft, armored vehicles, and submarines, and you are saying, "Oh, the U.S. military doesn't have enough horses! I heard the U.S. Air Force and Navy don't learn to ride horses anymore, and the horses can't keep up with their recruitment speed." You can imagine, the U.S. must not have horses, so are they going to lose? That is the kind of feeling this gives.

So regarding this process, let's talk about the present—anyway, just how far along is their drilling/simulation? Have you seen it? Including things like the AIM-260 air-to-air missile, which was only announced after signing a huge contract with Australia. Moreover, how much has the US actually produced itself, and how many ammunition depots have already been filled? You don't know anything, they aren't telling you. Now it's the same with this; the reason they announced that there's a USD 500 million mega-contract coming down is because—well, you tell me how much front-end preparation, testing, drilling, validation, and improvement have already been quietly completed behind the scenes? At the same time, how many new weapons are there with contracts that haven't been publicized, or can't be publicized? You, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), haven't the slightest clue. Furthermore, Hegseth recently mentioned at a special ceremony at the Pentagon that he personally operated this laser weapon, holding something that looked just like an Xbox controller, and said it allowed him to successfully hit the target. In other words, look, it's not hard to pick up! We might say, hey, if you want to talk about learning to shoot a gun and practicing like a sharpshooter, how long of a training process does that take? But you young people today all grew up playing video games. If you enlist, they tell you that holding this game controller is pretty much like the one you play with at home, and you sit there every day operating it just like playing a game, with a directed-energy weapon that doesn't waste ammunition. What kind of efficiency is that?

Antonio Deng has mentioned many times—first, missiles are also going to be deployed with particle beam weapons, though there hasn't been any news about it yet. Yeah, this is absolute; it's definitely going to be deployed everywhere, it's impossible to only deploy them on warships. Then they specifically emphasized that as power continuously increases and range constantly expands, our ability to deal with even more advanced and lethal threats will correspondingly grow stronger. Then it specifically mentioned that, well, you aren't currently going to see soldiers carrying a laser backpack onto the battlefield just yet. For now, this laser system is still bulky and quite heavy, and must be mounted on warships. Why do I feel like this sounds a bit like 'the local landowner denies having hidden 300 taels of silver' (protesting too much)? Even if such a backpack existed, would they necessarily have to tell me right now? A picture was specifically placed here: the Xbox control gamepad looks just like this, and the one used to operate the laser weapon looks pretty much the same. Then it says, look, there are many demonstration images right here, and the appearance of these systems is extremely similar—hey, here's a high-definition picture. Let you look at this front view, look at this front view, it looks extremely like a roadside speed camera! You talk about how the Chinese Communist Party's country makes so many speed cameras on the side of the road every day, yet hasn't developed a single truly useful gadget. This original name is a high-energy laser weapon called the Integrated Optical Dazzler and Surveillance system, abbreviated as Hades. According to reports, this set of system has already been arranged on warships—no, wait, it can already centrally produce a beam of high-energy laser with a power of up to 60 kilowatts to destroy targets. Most of the images published so far show that the targets being hit are still relatively small drones, but...

It also says here not to worry. Boeing recently launched a compact laser weapon system called CLWS. That Boeing weapon system can be used to shoot down these large drones, weighing up to 1,300 pounds, or about 590 kilograms. Doesn't the Chinese Communist Party's country boast about having large drones? Look, the laser weapon Boeing is now announcing推出的 is meant to handle the large ones, so the risks are yours to choose from, take your pick! So how can you not say the Chinese Communist Party is furious? After all, it really wants to destroy Boeing, and destroy companies like Lockheed Martin.

Then it says here that when Hegseth conducted his operational demonstration at the White Sands Missile Range in southern New Mexico, around June of this year, Hegseth picked up the controller and spent only a few minutes getting familiar with it before personally using the laser to shoot down a drone. I suppose Hegseth probably plays a bit fewer video games—just look at this efficiency. And now there is already this laser contract, this USD 500 million contract being the Army's first formal production contract signed for a high-energy laser weapon system. Of course, later it says, oh, there are also these shortcomings, you know. Weather conditions need to be a bit better. If there are a lot of mountain ranges, then from the perspective of the current situation, more deployments are still needed. So you should just take this with a grain of salt; they are just being modest, and if you take it seriously, you're being a bit overconfident. By the way, a reporter already asked whether the Space Force will also have deployments in this regard. And the spokesperson basically said that, well, ever since President Reagan's Star Wars back then, similar concepts have indeed been discussed. And from that Star Wars program to now, we have moved the lasers from the laboratory to the battlefield like never before. And it even said, you can call President Trump the Laser President—you tell me what that means. The Chinese Communist Party is still obsessing over drones and more drones. I feel like North Korea right now is like, I also know this stuff isn't that useful, but I'll just pull it out as a token of allegiance; anyway, if the Chinese Communist Party dies, let it die, at least I can survive. America, hurry up and look over here, we can also cooperate with you in drills, bringing out all our stuff to be used as targets. Good.