[Lude Society] 10/1/2026

This episode of Lude Media analyzed Xi Jinping's speech for the 77th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China, pointing out that its content was hollow, lacked any demonstration of substantive economic achievements, and treated the Taiwan issue as its only outlet and obsession. At the same time, the program discussed the latest developments in the terrorist attack at RAF Fairford in the UK, Trump's stance on how Iran and the UK handled the situation, Netanyahu's revelations regarding UK sanctions against Israel, as well as the latest trends in US-Russia nuclear arms control negotiations and the US military's research into strike plans against underground nuclear facilities.

Video link:

Full text:

Hello, viewers and friends. Welcome to today's October 1, 2026, episode of Lude Media's Dr. Yan Speaks. We are two minutes late because the system had an automatic update today, and just before we started, it took a few extra minutes to finish. Alright, first, let's say hello to our viewers and friends. Let's say hello to a viewer named Keep Keep, who said, 'Beautiful and lovely Dr. Yan Limeng, thank you for your hard work.' Thank you. Alright, let's take a look. First of all, today is the National Day for the CCP. I noticed that our backend is a bit stuck, so let me adjust the backend for everyone.

Today, Xi Jinping delivered a toast at the reception for the 77th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China, which is basically a speech at the reception given right before the toast. This speech is not very long, so let me briefly go through it for everyone. Right now we have no way to put it on the screen, because it seems that after the backend was updated, it's still a little bit hard to use. No worries, let's first briefly go through the matter for everyone. This was actually released by Xi Jinping on the evening of September 30, right? This is a toast addressed to the State Council, the people of the whole country, and so on for the so-called National Day. This speech is actually not long. Excluding the opening and closing paragraphs which are just greetings, there is basically no substantive content. Everyone knows that his usual speeches don't have much substantive content either, but this one is so hollow that it really makes people feel hard to read through, right? So I roughly went through it. This thing is only a few hundred words in total, and after reading it, I only had one feeling: indeed there is nothing much to say, to the extent that he couldn't even shout a few slogans. And the thing he cares about the most here is, look, on one hand, we say Xi has been running around paying state visits everywhere during this period, and what he is after is that none of you can help other foreign forces to interfere in our China's internal affairs, and all countries must be vigilant that foreign forces might cause unsafe signals to appear inside your countries, right? To put it bluntly, he is himself extremely, extremely afraid that the US will destroy the CCP. Then on the other hand, what is it? It's Taiwan, which he thinks about day and night. Hey, right now I think, actually, you could say, does Xi as the General Secretary and President have some mandatory task that he must take Taiwan down during his term? Why on earth is he now acting like he's possessed, biting onto the Taiwan issue and refusing to let go? It's just a kind of, I feel, particularly stubborn adherence to a dead logic, a stubborn adherence to a dead logic. You might say, if you are in such a state full of humanity, you could make a movie like Forrest Gump, where I just stubbornly run forward. You all say I'm stupid, but I just run forward—this is this kind of positive thing, and to use terms the CCP loves to say, that's positive energy. But you look at Taiwan living a good life, and how you feel uncomfortable no matter what, and then you fight desperately to take Taiwan down at all costs. After you can't take it down, even if the US detains you in DC, shows you the National Archives, shows you B1 and B2 bombers, and gives you all kinds of private warnings, when you come back you still bite hard and say, I want to take Taiwan. To be honest about this matter, is this the same as Forrest Gump's stubborn adherence? Although it looks quite similar, doesn't it actually run completely counter to it? Because this way of playing is purely anti-human, and completely incompatible with Western values or the current world order. He must think that he can hold up this big banner and get this thing done, but we haven't seen any progress at all. On the contrary, one wrong step leads to wrong steps all the way; at first vigor is renewed, then it flags, and finally it is exhausted. The two words "obsession" are vividly and thoroughly embodied in him—hasn't he gone mad? Doesn't it feel that way?

It truly feels like a form of madness. Let's go through these few hundred words together. You see the initial round of greetings—specifically addressing the People's Liberation Army and the armed police, followed by the Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan compatriots, and overseas Chinese; this is all just empty talk, no need to dwell on it. Then it goes on about how, over these 77 years, our Party has led the people in unremitting struggle, achieving the two miracles of long-term stability, and mentions the first centenary goal while pushing toward the second. Don't be so impatient; you can't get fat in one bite. It's only been 77 years, and you're already acting as if the centenary goal is achieved. You should first see if you can even make it through '78 or '79. Honestly, with two more National Days left before Trump finishes his term, who knows if you'll even be able to celebrate a complete National Day by then? What are you bragging about here? Then it talks about the world-renowned achievements of New China, feeling incredibly proud, bright prospects, and full of confidence. My goodness, this kind of empty boasting is really hard to accept. Even though we've been brainwashed from childhood, hearing and seeing these slogan-style things all our lives, when you look at the speeches given by people in the U.S.—as we often discuss on this program, whether it's Hegseth, Rubio, Biesent, or President Trump—whenever they have an important or formal occasion to give a speech, how many of you have seen such hollow rhetoric? Others talk about what they have actually done, using that as a foundation to say, 'Therefore, we feel very happy and proud,' and so on. That is how you bridge a speech; it's not like the CCP, where everything is empty, completely devoid of substance, and all the 'substance' is just a facade or purely deceptive. Look at what follows, right? 'Comrades, friends!' Since the beginning of this year, forging ahead with determination, the whole Party and the whole country have been solidly advancing the '15th Five-Year Plan,' responding to risks, the economy is moving forward under pressure, achieving new results in innovation and quality—I haven't seen any of that. Uh, I believe that whether you are an audience member experiencing this firsthand in China or one abroad with access to information about China, as long as you aren't playing dumb or carrying out a mission, I believe that looking at the overall economic situation of the CCP's China, you cannot see this 'forging ahead with determination, resilience, vitality, or innovative progress,' right? There is indeed a desperate scramble from top to bottom to cheat, steal, and scam one another. You also see all kinds of 'lying flat,' and the economic downturn affecting everyone; the bankruptcy of the middle class and their slide into poverty has become a trend, a tidal wave of the era. Many say that things are now worse than when people were laid off back in the day—we've heard plenty of that. Whether you like it or not, it's not about 'singing the blues' about you; it's that you suppress people from speaking, and this is the stench of decay that leaks out anyway. And yet they still brag. After bragging, they go on to brag about how the 'international situation is complex and intricate,' and that as long as you follow the Party, you can achieve a new landscape, improve people's livelihoods, and strive to complete goals. It is completely out of touch with the reality of society. I don't even have words to describe this, because watching it, I feel like it belongs to someone who—how should I put it?—regardless of whether the person in front of them is a human or a ghost, they will praise them into a flower. That's the feeling. As long as you hold that mindset, you can write this kind of 'eight-legged essay.'

And look, why do I say he has a gambler's mentality? Because the domestic situation is very clear; he knows that if he continues like this, even if you gave Xi Jinping two hundred heads or a lifespan of 150 years, he couldn't turn the tide. So his only goal now is to break through externally. But because the U.S. and its allies are pressuring him on every front, look at the CCP's China, right? The little buddies in Latin America are gone, the good allies in the Middle East are mostly dead, and Russia is watching him like a tiger, drooling every day, wishing they could swallow him whole. He now has no choice but to struggle against the Pacific side, and the U.S. is riding the island chain ever tighter. So, look, after shouting those empty phrases, even though it's supposed to be the birthday of 'New China'—and while the preceding words were empty, they should have been a bit more extensive—he suddenly and abruptly pivots to 'One Country, Two Systems' and 'resolutely cracking down on Taiwan independence.' It feels so disjointed. Even though he thinks, 'I am celebrating the birthday of New China, the birthday of the CCP's China, so I must write a few lines of nice-sounding words,' he just piles up whatever nonsense he can to gild Xi's face. But in reality, what he's truly thinking is that he can't worry about anything else. I'm stuck internally, I can't get anything done, and pushing outward, I can't move anything. This is what it means to be 'under pressure.' The international situation is complex and intricate, right? The only breakthrough left in his eyes is Taiwan. Hey, look, doesn't this approach feel like the militaristic pre-war mobilization propaganda we talked about regarding the Shuiyin Beach incident? That's exactly the flavor!

And look, besides that, didn't the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) originally have a certain international grand strategy in mind? Didn't our friend Lei already explain it? Xi's idea was: I'll fan the flames of the Russia-Ukraine war today so you get bogged down in a fight; tomorrow I'll stir up trouble with Iran so that the Middle East becomes a chaotic mess; and the day after tomorrow I'll have Cuba, Venezuela, and Colombia—regions Xi considers his own backyard—spark a fire in America's backyard. His calculation was brilliant: with multiple fronts open, the United States wouldn't be able to handle it all, you'd be completely overwhelmed, and then Xi could just casually take Taiwan along the way, right? But the problem is, it hasn't gone according to plan. On May 14, let's play the audio recording for everyone. Overall, he's collapsing both domestically and internationally, and his military just isn't up to par. His strategy is an absolute mess too. So now he finds himself in a situation where, despite meticulously planning everything for years, he's being pushed back left and right until there's almost nothing left. He thought he was like a giant rat underground, digging all these exits leading in every direction to confuse and attract the enemy. Oh boy, he thought playing this game was all about guerrilla warfare, Sun Tzu's Art of War, and the Seventy-Two Stratagems from Romance of the Three Kingdoms! General Secretary Xi truly believed he was orchestrating everything like a master strategist. Little did he expect that on multiple fronts, people would just cut him off instantly. And what's more, even the cryptocurrencies and shadow networks he worked so hard to develop were silently frozen, confiscated, or busted directly. None of the fronts are working out, the overall situation can't be mobilized, and he can't get a grip on things either inside or outside. As a result, Xi is now so cornered that the only path he has left is Taiwan. And as we've said, because he's backed into a corner, Taiwan seems to be the only path that still holds any hope. Don't forget, the CCP currently thinks that when it comes to taking Taiwan—including waging information warfare and cognitive warfare against the island—it all boils down to repeating the same old message: do not trust the United States. Look at how Trump neither receives Lai Ching-te nor calls him, but instead calls Xi Jinping every few days, meets with him every few days, and even gives Xi super-high-level treatment, right? Look, the B-1B bomber has never flown over Lai Ching-te's head, Les Misérables has never been played for President Lai, and President Lai hasn't even been invited to Washington to eat that pumpkin and eggplant soup. We're just saying that when it comes to Xi, you'll truly realize that his deepest, most obsessive fixation is Taiwan. And now, under these circumstances, when all his other fronts are failing, oh, what a coincidence, it seems Trump is the one point where Xi feels confident that Trump won't dare to substantially challenge or, how should I put it, manipulate or defy him on the Taiwan issue. Because whenever Xi stands before Trump—whether in Beijing or D.C.—he opens his mouth with things like, "I must emphasize to you, Taiwan independence is out of the question, and we oppose external interference. Hey, our position is cross-strait peace and national reunification, and ever since history began... I don't recognize the Treaty of San Francisco." He always rattles on with this rhetoric, right? So you see, Xi's obsession right now, under the immense pressure of this bursting situation, has somehow become—have you noticed?—his only entrance, his only exit, his only valve for venting, like the steam valve on a pressure cooker just before it blows. Right now, it's this Taiwan issue, and this point is starting to look very interesting. But as we've said, Xi... look, doesn't he put it this way? Right on National Day—which logically should be a time for auspicious blessings and pleasantries, not a time to sound the drums of war and issue something resembling a declaration of war—this short speech is simply overflowing with uncontainable murderous intent. Yet right here, look how Xi transitions instantly from improving people's livelihoods to "Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong, Macao people governing Macao, 'One Country, Two Systems', resolutely cracking down on separatist forces for Taiwan independence across the strait, these separatist forces must cooperate, pursue peace, and achieve reunification," and then promoting the implementation of the four major global initiatives, building a community with a shared future for mankind, and injecting more certainty and positive energy into the world. Have you noticed? Basically, by this point, the main body of the speech is pretty much wrapped up, right? Because what follows is just "Comrades, friends," and the closing remarks. Look, in these few main paragraphs—these short paragraphs—besides what we just mentioned as a pure listing of empty rhetoric, the only concrete issue he talks about isn't it this so-called "One Country, Two Systems" and forcibly reunifying Taiwan? And banning external forces from interfering in his grand cause of reunification? That's the only real thing! So do you see it? In this National Day address, Xi can no longer hide the desperate mindset of a gambler making his last stand, clutching at that single thread of hope, that tiny steam valve hissing on the pressure cooker—and that is Taiwan. Now, if you think backward, why is it such a coincidence? Trump seemingly appears hesitant on the Taiwan issue—avoiding substantial contact with President Lai, seemingly trying to block arms sales (even if he can't block 100% of them, he seems to intercept some of the core ones). And on the U.S. side, Xi says, "Don't sell high-tech weapons to Taiwan so fast, alright? I'm going to the United States soon, and if you sell them, I won't come to meet you, Trump." And then doesn't Rubio immediately come out and say, "Whether we sell weapons to Taiwan or anywhere else depends entirely on our own schedule," right?

If we say we are temporarily not providing him with certain weapons, and this shipment is delayed, it is also due to the adjustments in our overall Pacific and global deployments. Anyway, let me interpret this for everyone: Rubio is absolutely not backing down to Xi. However, as we have said, if you listen to this over and over, Xi can interpret it to mean exactly what he wants. Uh, you must not underestimate the way those sycophants flatter him, right? They can interpret it in a way that makes Xi feel ecstatic, right? Our viewers mentioned that this toast—this address—was actually titled something like 'A Chapter of Prosperity, A Splendid China.' If they can blow it out of proportion like this, you know that these signals from the U.S. regarding Taiwan can be interpreted by Xi as Trump being weak on this issue, right? So it further fuels his obsession to make a move on this, and in the end, he will charge straight toward this obsession. Hey, doesn't this confirm what we said before? You dig this rat hole, you pour water into it, you seal the holes, or whatever—in the end, you leave that rat underground with only one path, then you lure it out of the hole, and you catch it all in one go at the entrance, right?

Right? If Xi is still holding onto this idea that Taiwan can be retaken, really, that's just—well, it still comes back to what I said: I knew his brain wasn't working well, but I didn't know it was working this badly. And the US is like, anyway, I've done my utmost, right? We gave you the notice we should give, gave you the narrative we should give, gave you the notice just like serving a subpoena, like an indictment has already been delivered to you. So if you're determined to court death yourself, there's no saving you, right? So can we only rely on the US military to show its strength? Right? So look at this, seeing Xi's National Day speech, this.

It belongs to holding onto this matter of Taiwan independence, holding onto this matter of reunification.

He just refuses to get off this gambling table, like on this gambling table of mine, what I'm gambling on is this Taiwan reunification! And now you, giving me so much pressure, right? I've already lost to the point where I have no shirt left to wear, no trousers left to wear, when my leather shoes and socks are already gone, Xi still refuses to accept this loss, he must hold tightly to this cross-strait reunification business, I've got to turn this game around for you, that's really the vibe, you guys carefully savor this, savor it closely. So later you see, at the very end, it's still that very empty stuff, like through long-term practice and exploration, socialism with Chinese characteristics has demonstrated huge advantages, the modernization level of our country's governance system and governance capacity is constantly improving, realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.

It's unstoppable, just seeing this, this kind of empty rhetoric like sending sacred blessings or celebrating a birthday has instead become the absolute priority in his National Day speech. And then it gets even more ridiculous, just like everyone standing together shouting slogans, that is, as long as we firm up our confidence, anchor our targets, and take solid steps forward one by one, success will definitely belong to the great Chinese Communist Party, the great Chinese people, the great People's Republic of China! And then what, finally, a toast to the 77th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China, see that? Just this whole piece makes people feel.

Aside from shouting slogans, aside from the murderous intent of crying out for war to attack Taiwan, you can't see a single other thing from it! Being able to fabricate and spread a piece like this really takes the rack-and-brain-exhausting dog-head and rat-head strategists, right? Revolving around this business of taking Taiwan, just this.

Setting off the whole thing that taking Taiwan is Chairman Xi's obsession, oh man, it's simply giving off the feeling that if you don't let him take Taiwan, he's going to explode on the spot right before your eyes, right? The US says, awesome, if you're not going to actually make a move on this matter, sometimes to completely open you up, we still have to keep playing tricks with you, right? Still have to collect evidence of your crimes everywhere, and then still have to roll out these narratives over and over again, and still have to listen to your sophistry. But look, when Xi is now driven by the Chinese Communist Party to this very last line, he really has nothing else left to say, and doesn't mention it either. Look, have you noticed, actually in here.

He barely mentioned these past seventy-some years, whether it's reform and opening up or their Belt and Road, he doesn't dare mention these anymore! Logically speaking, the Belt and Road, right? You'd say reform and opening up wasn't initiated by Xi, but the Belt and Road was initiated by Xi, right? Did you guys see? It's just that throughout the whole thing, he didn't even talk about the Belt and Road. I remember in past years, whenever there were these kinds of speeches, things like the Belt and Road, these topics, or Global South countries, or BRICS and the SCO, they all had to be mentioned, because these belong to the achievements of General Secretary Xi leading the entire party and state to shine brightly on the international stage.

This year, none of that is mentioned, it's just bitter resentment, right? A bunch of nonsense in the front, a bunch of gibberish in the back, and right in the middle, bitterly highlighting two words: Taiwan. It has—if I may say something unpleasant—a feeling of chanting a curse! Really, just look at this point, I'm telling you, I think Xi won't be able to hold out much longer, and on this Taiwan matter, he's definitely going to stir up some trouble next. And the US is also waiting right there, think about it, we talked about how Xi just got back during this period.

Before National Day, he probably originally thought he could look forward to two big tribute events, right? Whether it was RAF Fairford, or that Israel thing, or that 9/11 anniversary, both double firecrackers turned into duds, did you see that? So there's this feeling of, wow, a breath rushed straight to the chest, and then.

It's choked right there, the whole thing is out of breath, only able to muster up strength, shouting wildly: "I want revenge! I want to take Taiwan! If I don't take Taiwan, I won't die in peace!" That kind of vibe.

You take this scene, you combine it together and think about it, wasn't it just one breath? Double firecrackers turned into duds, that's two breaths choked back into the chest! You guys carefully feel it, our audience friends, use your imagination. Anyway, I have this visual in my mind, so that's why you can interpret why the article he read suddenly popped up with the matter of reunifying Taiwan right in the middle, feeling like it's amidst all the floral brocade and so-called myriad scenes of a prosperous age.

It feels like a declaration of war, a call to arms, doesn't it? Oh, right. Taiwan has local elections in November. Think about it: as I just said, things didn't work out in the UK, and things didn't work out in Israel. The targets were the two biggest enemies: the US and Israel, right? And then, what other thorns in the side does the CCP have? One is Japan, and the other is Taiwan. So, let's put this on the record now: two shots have misfired over there, so Japan and Taiwan must be very careful. It feels like Xi is...

He is completely unable to hold back anymore! Why is this? Initially, I didn't want to talk about his speech. At first glance, I thought, 'Wow, there isn't a single honest word in there.' But looking closer, no, we have to address this, because he isn't even hiding it anymore, is he? Think about it: what if there is some kind of incident, whether it's a terrorist attack like the one on a military base, or something like 9/11, or various other things? That could instantly...

It could turn the situation for you—whether it's Japan or Taiwan—completely upside down. Although we don't think they can win, there will definitely be innocent people harmed, right? And there will definitely be losses, so you must be on guard. Xi is no longer covering it up. Let's start by putting this on the record today.

And then? Look here, when Trump was meeting with reporters these past two days—like yesterday, a reporter asked him, 'When you met with Xi Jinping, did you discuss the release of political prisoners? For example, Mr. Jimmy Lai and that American scholar, uh, the Burmese scholar named Min Aung, right?'

Trump said, 'I discussed it. I did indeed discuss it with President Xi. We hope these very, very important discussions will yield results. But let me tell you, given Xi's attitude, I don't think he will ever release Mr. Jimmy Lai, because he hates the Hong Kong protesters who fought back so much. He hates that they made him lose face back then, right? He pushed through the entire Hong Kong national security law just like that. Although at the time it seemed like Xi had successfully maneuvered around it, preventing the Trump administration from imposing double tariffs, decoupling, or cutting off power, look at the years since then. Even if he temporarily held Trump back then, now that Trump is back, it's even worse.'

It's a revenge attack! So I feel that regarding Mr. Jimmy Lai, Xi has this urge to vent his personal hatred. Of course, we hope Mr. Jimmy Lai can be safe and regain his freedom, right? As for that person named Min Jin, or sometimes translated as Min Aung, the American scholar...

He is in a slightly better position than Mr. Jimmy Lai. For one thing, regarding his case, the CCP claims he is a spy, right? This is not the same as the 'subversion of state power' charge they pinned on Mr. Jimmy Lai. At the very least, the nature of the case is different. Because Jimmy Lai is at least considered a Hong Konger, the CCP thinks, 'You are my person; you are mine in life and mine in death.' Furthermore, Min Aung has American citizenship, while Mr. Jimmy Lai holds British and Hong Kong citizenship. As for that British passport, honestly, with everything the British government is doing now, do you really expect that as a British citizen, you can get the CCP to play the card of releasing a political prisoner?

I don't hold much hope, because besides paying lip service, what do you expect them to do, right? They can only say on one hand, 'Oh, our human rights, our freedom, we value them very much,' and on the other hand, 'Hey, we are short of money. Is the CCP willing to cooperate more with us? If you are willing to cooperate, the financial center in the heart of London, or even the Chagos Islands in the British Indian Ocean Territory, aren't they available for you, the CCP?'

Is that the state of things? As for the two people you mentioned, Trump has already discussed them. What I didn't expect was that it would get the Guo Wengui camp all excited! Even people like Huang Hebian are saying, 'Oh, it looks like President Xi discussed using Guo Wengui to exchange for them.' My god, Guo Wengui, stop trying to ride the coattails here! Do you really think Xi would exchange you back now? You didn't do what Liang Guanjun did at the last minute, right? At least he managed to escape back to the country. You've already been in there for thirty years, and they didn't even charge you with espionage.

Xi is talking about a political prisoner. Look, it's clearly stated here that Min Jin is classified by the US State Department as 'wrongfully detained.' Like Mr. Jimmy Lai, the CCP also acknowledges he is a political prisoner, so these two count as political prisoners. You, Guo Wengui, are in prison for fraud, okay? Fraud is enough to get you thirty years. Why do you think you could be swapped during a political prisoner exchange? Don't you deny being a CCP agent? Huh? Have you seen this? That whole 'New Federal State of China' crowd over at Guo's side, every day they are visiting Guo in prison or talking to him on the phone. This was all during the Trump-Xi summit.

That is straight-up sucking up to Peng Liyuan! One by one, they describe Peng Liyuan as if she were some noble hermit in the mountains like Jin Yingxue or an otherworldly fairy like Jin Molin! Oh, it's just pure, flawless, elegant, gentle, and wonderful! They even say this reflects the demeanor of the mother of the nation and showcases the talent of a major country! And then this is it.

They hope that Peng Liyuan, this Ms. Peng Liyuan, can become a capable assistant by Chairman Xi Jinping's side, and then, you know, assist Xi wholeheartedly in certain matters, with Xi going to eliminate the CCP. So before this, anyway, Guo Wengui had also pledged loyalty to Xi Jinping anyway, didn't he write those things like the Seven Articles of Guo? Later, after being caught, it was also confirmed that he had exquisite People's Liberation Army August 1st medals in his pocket, two of them even. Therefore, the people on Guo's side haven't been hiding it these days either; on the one hand, they suck up to Peng Liyuan, and on the other hand, they say things just like Dr. Guan, repeatedly chanting that Xi is the greatest comrade, that our comrade Xi, General Secretary Xi, is personally eliminating the CCP.

Ah, what this is trying to do is to bring back the state-destroying thieves and all that stuff to that old routine. See it clearly or not? Right now, a bunch of people are really daydreaming. Are you all Rico? Let me say something ugly: if Xi's mind suddenly snaps today and he wants to take Guo and these Ricos back, wouldn't the US side be even happier? You and Rico are together, doesn't that just practically confirm to the whole world that you are Rico's boss, right?

How can you make this up here? Oh, even though they want to weave this, they want to weave a narrative like what? Oh, because Guo is Xi's number one enemy, Xi might rather use Jimmy Lai and Minjun to exchange for him. But this bullshit narrative of yours can only fool those with an IQ below twenty, right? Anyone with a Border Collie-level IQ wouldn't believe it when they hear it, you know? So that's what we say here.

Guo's side is also completely shameless! Seeing the last opportunity right before their eyes, they hope Xi can lend a helping hand and save them! They feel that now they don't even remember that, hum, Trump didn't give me a pardon, even if he gives me an acquittal I don't want it, I just want Trump to give me a pardon, right? Hey, completely forgetting their previous grand words. Just looking at this is dying of laughter, absolutely dying of laughter. Anyway, how is this going? They can't even take care of themselves now, they just want to desperately escape from the American prison and return to the embrace of their party! Hoping that one day they can serve Xi again. Oh, this.

So you see it or not? Over there, Xi is desperately shouting during the National Day, baring his teeth and claws, saying that Taiwan must be reunified, must be reunified, and the Chinese Communist Party will definitely win! Over there, that person is just like, Seventh Brother is going to be traded back? Oh, Seventh Brother, Seventh Brother, awesome! Seventh Brother, Xi, and Peng Liyuan are all comrades, oh boy, really.

This brain doesn't work well! You look at it and feel it's extremely ridiculous, and at the same time, it makes people feel deeply stinky. Alright, speaking of this, let's talk about the UK. Over in the UK, Trump had a very interesting response to a reporter yesterday. Wood has already talked about this video program for everyone, so we will specifically pull out this sentence again. Look, yesterday a reporter said, oh, the British Prime Minister stated there are strong signs that Iran was involved in the attack on the Fairford Air Force Base, saying Iran's involvement can be confirmed. What was President Trump's single sentence in response? Trump said.

Is Iran playing a role? Iran played a role. And the reporter said, the UK says Iran played a role. What response are you actually preparing to give to Iran now? Are you satisfied with the current situation? Trump said, look, we are currently studying this matter, studying it, we are studying it very seriously. When Trump says a sentence two or three times, it's either to emphasize or to brush you off. Then Trump said, Iran has a lot of problems right now, you know, they have no money, their currency is finished, their economy is finished, their military is finished, they don't have any military, the leaders are fiercely seizing power, right?

The problem is what else can they control? Well, anyway, we will respond to this very soon. Listen to this, we told everyone yesterday, the UK says they found Iran involved in it, but the UK doesn't dare to say Iran is the only foreign force involved, right? Or the complete mastermind. And Rubio and Trump, as we told you before, from all angles indicate that besides Iran, there is definitely.

A greater foreign force behind the scenes that they are currently inconvenient to talk too much about. Well, you tell me, who else could it be besides the Xi-CCP? Right? It coincides right on the critical timing of the National Day tribute, such a big posture, you see Trump's words actually coincide with what we discussed. Trump didn't directly respond to this reporter, and Rubio also said many details cannot be discussed right now. Remember? Trump said, I've been keeping an eye on this matter all along, we've known about this since before it happened and before the arrests were made, keeping everything completely under view.

Trump has been hinting that he is watching how the UK handles this matter, right? As a result, Trump said, "If I were to tell you specifically, I could even tell you who did it; I'm just not saying it." Consequently, the UK arrested five suspects, released them in less than 36 hours, and without bail. Then, looking back, Trump expressed that he was very angry. Meanwhile, the UK is over there saying, "Uh, we think it was probably Iran, um."

Trump said, "Iran? Is Iran involved too? Ah, you put these two answers together, and Iran has problems now, indeed they have problems, so many problems. But the question is, do they still have the capability? Is that what you mean? Look, is that what Trump's answer means?"

Are you trying to use Iran as a scapegoat in this matter now? Iran definitely played a role, but as for whether you say this was the power of the Iranian state, or if some Iranian terrorists sent a few people, or if some Iranians were directly exploited here, right? After stirring things up, it just so happens that these extremists are willing to die and be used as cannon fodder; these are different situations. So you see, when you connect Trump's two answers, it's like:

"The UK intends to tell you about this, and they are pointing straight at Iran? Do they dare to draw that conclusion? Iran is in such a pathetic state right now; do you think they could pull this off? Don't you, the UK, need to explain this clearly to me? Is that what you mean?" So the reporter said, "Well, Mr. President, let's talk about the UK's handling of this matter." Trump said, "The British reporter asked if I was satisfied?" Trump said, "I'm not satisfied. They actually released a few people; those were people we caught. So, we catch terrorists who are going to bomb our US military base, and not only does the UK do nothing, but you also release them?"

Trump said yesterday, "I'm still confirming whether these things are actually true; it's unbelievable. Did they really release them, or are they preparing to conduct some intelligence operations there, right?" So Trump said, "Well, anyway, we will know later. We are still communicating with the UK." You can tell that when Trump responded to this yesterday morning, he was very, very dissatisfied. And then, today.

Reporters interviewed Trump again this morning and brought up this matter again. This was about the plane incident yesterday, right? Listen to this answer; it's different. You see, I'll tell you this part first, look, Netanyahu came to see Trump, right? And regarding the Boeing plane incident, Trump specifically issued a statement praising the excellence and superiority of the Boeing plane. Then look, the reporter asked him, "If Iran is the mastermind behind this plane hijacking terrorist attack, will you retaliate against Iran?" Trump said, "They will be hit very hard; go ask them and you'll know. They know what happened, and they will be hit very hard."

See that? The fact is, Trump never said, "I won't strike Iran," nor did he say, "I'll let Iran off the hook." But like the terrorist attack yesterday, Iran's involvement behind the scenes feels like it carries more weight. I mean, compared to the Fairford incident, because for the Fairford incident, you have to carry out such a major terrorist attack on a US military base—and the most powerful US military base in Europe at that—the preparations you make are certainly not as simple as just arranging a co-pilot.

Right? And as for yesterday's plane terrorist attack, because the intelligence was actually mainly held by Israel, not the United States, you see that Trump's responses are different when both matters point to Iran. See that? This part is very worth pondering, right? I said it long ago, sigh.

In the eyes of the United States, when they already know who the mastermind is, if you think they know—let's assume, say, if the CCP was behind the Fairford incident, and you in the UK catch people and then release them, hurry up and think about how to hush this matter up. Even within your UK Labour Party or whatever, including the arrest of Prince Andrew, is there still the power of the CCP behind Prince Andrew? Because the arrest of Prince Andrew would lead to the downfall of their entire faction, so they would rather fight to the death, bring the United States and China together—bring the United States down with the CCP—and then wouldn't they have hope again? Huh?

So in this situation, you have to know that if they want to close the case on the Fairford incident hastily and cover it up, Trump is simply not buying it. And regarding the plane terrorist attack, the hijacking, because Israel is mainly leading this matter and the US is cooperating with them, Trump is like, "If you have confirmed it is Iran, then we will hit them hard." They know what it feels like to be hit hard, see? Completely different feelings, oh. And in this, you look again.

Trump actually, regarding Iran, hey, he actually said...

Regarding whether to deal with Iran or not, and whether an agreement can be reached, Trump also said that if an agreement cannot be reached, they will just be bombed, and a decision can be made very quickly since the time is almost up and it will soon be over—either they get bombed and completely wiped out, or they completely surrender to us. Today, I saw news online saying that Rubio issued an eviction notice on Monday, driving away the Iranian delegation led by Abbas Araghchi. They left early Tuesday morning, not even staying until Wednesday. Some people are saying, "Look, look, Iran and America failed to reach a deal again, right? The Iranian President came to the UN General Assembly and made anti-American remarks, and Araghchi didn't sign the total surrender treaty; didn't he just slink away in disgrace?"

This shows that Iran is still very tough right now. Just think, Trump already told you that there is fierce internal fighting and a power struggle going on within Iran. Isn't that because, behind the scenes, the CCP has not given up and is desperately fighting the US over the Iran issue? On the US side...

Figures like Araghchi and Masoud Pezeshkian are actually very obvious; they are the Rodriguez figures chosen on the US side who are constantly cooperating with the US. But didn't the CCP choose Rezaei and so many other terrorists, famous and infamous, right? The CCP always has successors; even if Rezaei dies, it doesn't matter, there's still Esmail Qaani behind, right? And this one, that one, and the other one, so the CCP is still there.

Feeling that they can still contend, if the US under these circumstances makes it explicitly clear to you that Pezeshkian and Araghchi are officially approved—well, their talks are fine, the US protects them, and they are now cowering before the US—then wouldn't these two be taken out in a matter of minutes upon returning? The US would have to go find another Rodriguez all over again, wouldn't it? Therefore, let me tell you, including what sources say about Araghchi being driven away, and including this...

Pezeshkian arriving in the US, right? At the UN General Assembly making anti-American remarks again, and then continuing to be very tough and anti-American after going back. Just listen to it for what it's worth; if you don't believe it, wait and see—it's impossible for the US to be that foolish in handling this matter, right?

Including the current internal fighting within Iran, with the situation being so complex there, how could the whole truth be told to you? It's clearly a mix of truth and falsehoods. You wage a cognitive warfare, and I wage a cognitive warfare too, right? So just listen for reference. On the other hand, in Britain, look at yesterday—didn't Trump show little approval, implying that since Iran is involved, Britain, you want to pin this blame on Iran? After you released the people, you decided to say that Iran orchestrated this, is that what you mean?

Well, news came out today saying that Britain arrested a 25-year-old Iranian-British dual national in Westminster. This person was arrested on suspicion of involvement in a terrorist attack on the RAF Fairford base. He is 25 years old, and another 26-year-old British citizen has also been questioned after being cautioned by police regarding their legal rights. In addition, police searched two properties in central London.

Now, regarding this matter, I honestly don't understand what kind of game Britain is playing. They arrested five people, released them in a day and a half, and then arrested one and a half back—because the second one is still in the questioning stage, and it is very likely that after questioning, he will be released unconditionally, or even released directly. Then Britain starts saying, "This matter is extremely complex, we are investigating deeply, and all possibilities are being investigated." And Burnham also emphasizes, "Oh, we have strong indications that Iran played a role." The problem is...

I mean, for those five people, if you had properly questioned, interrogated, investigated, and detained them all together from the start, wouldn't you potentially have gathered a lot more information by now? You released five, and then re-arrested—who knows if the people dragged back were even among the original five who drove there? Somehow I always feel Britain is acting very strangely in this matter, and we just don't know if Britain's system naturally operates in a way that makes it so hard for ordinary people to understand. They just...

Release all five directly, and then for the last one and a half, they desperately shout to the outside world, "Don't believe or spread rumors, we are investigating very seriously right now," which is really quite unsettling. Local residents interviewed even said that these people were just let go like that. Farmers and residents living near the local village said, "Well, what if this time fails, and next time they launch a true, comprehensive attack? We'll just be sitting here like live targets, it's not safe at all." This is what local residents told reporters.

And just think, the person who reported it at the time said they saw eight to ten people, yet only five were arrested, and then all released. Putting yourself in their shoes—if you were one of those local residents, wouldn't you be afraid of retaliation? And do you remember that female MP, the conservative British female MP, who was recently directly targeted at home by these kinds of terrorists?

Breaking into a house to commit murder, and the UK actually failed to catch the person at first, then caught the wrong person, and then after a few days, what happened? Hey, this matter just fizzled out, right? It's as if it were some kind of accidental break-in to steal things, and the owner happened to run into them—it's not that simple. You go look at that case; we talked about it before. It feels like it was staged as a burglary, and then a tragedy occurred accidentally after being discovered. In reality, it was fatal stab after fatal stab; that female MP died very miserably. Hey, I haven't heard any follow-up on it. So, under these circumstances, let me tell you.

The US cannot possibly not be keeping an eye on this in the UK. To be honest, it's not just a simple matter of terrorists; it's about whether someone is behind the scenes using these terrorists to deal a major blow to the US! Some viewers might not understand how the Trump administration uses Musk. You don't need to worry about that. Didn't Trump say it himself? US soil is governed by US law, right? It's not about Musk as an individual, but about the companies he represents, like SpaceX and others, which receive a lot of US defense investment. Do you think a CEO can just control everything? It's just that, look, the midterm elections are coming up, right? Trump will definitely.

As long as it's useful, I'll use it as much as possible. Because if he doesn't use it, someone else will, right? It's not just the CCP that knows how to play the united front game; the US can do the opposite, right? Anyway, by using you, the CCP has to keep pouring money into this. After they pour the money in, and then you don't acknowledge it, the CCP has wasted its money, wasted.

Cultivating people, right? So there are ways to play this game. You say the Department of Defense can sign a cooperation agreement with Musk now? There's a lot in it. If you want to sign a cooperation agreement with the military, and you end up causing trouble, the military will make you pay a much worse price, do you know that? So there's no need to worry about this. Take Musk, for example; our viewers don't trust him. But back in May or June of last year, when Musk was clamoring to destroy Trump, he almost said he would directly destroy Trump. Didn't he keep talking about how many years Trump has left and how many years he has left? Right? Do you really think Trump doesn't see through it? Impossible; he can only see more clearly than us. So that's why they say Trump's unpredictability is what his enemies can't see through, can't see through at all. If you say, oh, this Musk.

If things like using or not using Musk could be seen through by outsiders, then Trump's style of doing things wouldn't have that unpredictability, right? Okay, let's continue. Netanyahu has already arrived in the US, right? Wow, he broke a shocking story on Fox today! He talked about the Fairford incident on Fox, and this is what he said.

He said, "Do you want to hear how ridiculous this situation is?" This was during an interview with Sean Hannity, where Netanyahu spoke. It's gone viral online tonight. He said, "Do you know to what extent the UK is anti-Israel now? We provided intelligence to the UK saying that an attack would occur, an attack supported by Iran." And online, many interpretations say that what he provided was related to the Fairford terror attack, right? And then he said that almost the next day, the UK imposed sanctions on us.

Ah, look, if this interpretation from the outside isn't wrong, because the media is now saying that Netanyahu provided information about Fairford, since the only terror attack in the UK recently that everyone can see is related to Iran is this Fairford one, right? And Netanyahu said sanctions were imposed the next day, which happened around September 8th or 9th. That seems to connect with Fairford, being two or three weeks apart, right? Anyway, it was when Netanyahu warned the UK that there would be a terror attack, an Iranian terror attack.

Not only was he not thanked, but the very next day—and it wasn't just the UK itself, it was the UK Labour government joining twelve other countries to sanction Israel. Now Netanyahu has put this out there today, combined with—think about why, after the attempted hijacking yesterday, the mainstream media all used the same propaganda, calling it an 'altercation' or a 'fight in the cockpit'.

Right? Just a verbal or physical conflict, completely ignoring the viciousness of the terrorists inside, ignoring the heroic feats performed by the pilots and the ordinary people on board—whether they were plumbers or dentists, it doesn't matter—it was directly downplayed! Forced to divert, hey, if it had actually crashed, it would be, 'Oh, there was an altercation in the cockpit that caused the Boeing 737 to crash!' I don't know what happened, but surely the quality of Boeing is also not good, right? You can just muddy the waters! So Netanyahu just threw this out today, saying, 'Look at this!'

When it comes to preventing terrorist attacks, Britain hasn't really contributed much, has it? But turning around and biting the hand that feeds them by sanctioning Israel—now that is something they actually did. You tell this to Trump, right? Britain says Israel did it—uh, says Iran did it, right? And they even let everyone go, which is just so unbelievable. When you put all these things together and think about it, what's behind this is definitely not simple, is it? Right, let's say—returning to this UK sanction against Israel in early September, that was a big deal. This matter put heavy pressure on Israel, because.

What was going on at the time? They said the UK Labour Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, told reporters because the UK announced, saying that this—in Netanyahu's words—announced the very day that, you say this implementation against illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, we have to sanction you, saying that you are carrying out ethnic cleansing against Palestinians in illegal settlements. Moreover, Foreign Secretary David Miliband said this marks a new approach by the UK on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, saying that this approach will not only point out injustice and suffering, but also take action.

If Britain had this kind of mindset of taking action against injustice and suffering, we might say Mr. Jimmy Lai should have already been rescued, right? Oh, who are you putting on an act for? Over there in Palestine—oh, we want this new action, to stop this ethnic cleansing. Then over there, they're cozying up and licking the boots of the Chinese Communist Party, really. And then the Israeli Foreign Minister at the time said it was simply intolerable, an utterly intolerable lie. Moreover, when this matter broke in early September, Israel immediately announced countermeasures, closing the British Consulate in East Jerusalem.

When Britain proposed these sanctions at the time, all goods coming from Israeli settlements in the West Bank were banned from import, and action was also to be taken against businesses and individuals providing services to these settlements. Furthermore, they joined forces with a total of 12 countries. The first batch to take action were the UK, France, and Canada. As everyone knows, Carney is very willing to do this kind of thing, isn't he? At the same time, France—well, France is inherently one of those countries that muddies the waters, jumping around everywhere, participating wherever there are profits to be made, right? France, taking the moral high ground and playing the political correctness card, generally never misses out on this.

Not to mention, just think about it: why on earth does Britain suddenly care so much about Palestine in the Middle East now? Ah, just think, with all the fighting in the Middle East, the fourth day of the newly constructed order—Israel is a dominant force in the Middle East, and the US wants all Gulf countries to recognize it, right? Right before our eyes, through the Abraham Accords, they are bringing them all under Israel's umbrella, with the US acting as a larger umbrella covering them from above.

Right? And then including the entire energy landscape, including the dismantling of OPEC, including the rearrangement of energy shipping and transportation aspects—in fact, our show has already talked about it, including sanctions on the shadow fleet and so on, which shattered Britain's remaining set of systems and laws, making everyone start rallying toward the US on the fourth day. So you see, Britain in this process, it can only exert effort against the US behind the scenes, especially after the US ruthlessly published the Epstein documents. So you see, after they were published, everyone thought—wasn't Clinton close to Epstein? Yet Clinton's matter didn't even trigger a criminal investigation.

It unexpectedly triggered criminal investigations against Lord Mandelson and Prince Andrew in the UK. Didn't we tell everyone? You, Britain, are the one being targeted! The Epstein documents are a great tool, right? So Britain fighting the US, it's very obvious now. Even if you have anger in your heart, you can only hold it in for now. But they feel their fists are harder than Israel's, so they are taking their frustration out on Israel. Especially given what Netanyahu has exposed—when Netanyahu warned Israel, wait, warned Britain.

That Iran was going to carry out a terrorist attack, and when it concerned Britain, they actually met with retaliation instead, you have to wonder what kind of role Britain is playing in this now! Ah, how suddenly there is no groundless love, nor groundless hate? Regarding the Palestinians, you must never expect the British government to have groundless love right now, and toward Israel, it can't be groundless hate either, right? To put it bluntly, this is all a matter of interests! Britain's interests right now have been.

Sliced smaller and smaller, so now look, they are also playing the sanctions game, right? The US sanctions the CCP, and since I am partnered with the CCP, I am going to sanction your US ally Israel—did you understand that? And they also want to mobilize other far-left countries to join in, or not strictly far-left, anyway, whoever can be persuaded is pulled together first. Then why did France jump in at the first moment? France also has interests over there. Didn't you see that France's Macron has even unprecedentedly said he would send troops to reinforce Saudi Arabia to combat the Houthis? The purpose is to protect the oil pumping facilities and so on in Yemen that are being hit by the Houthis, uh, and that facility seems to be related to French investments or contracts.

When it comes to their own interests, frankly speaking, they are about to be torn apart, right? They can no longer care about peace or universal love. Yes, logically speaking, you support Pakistan so much, and Pakistani terrorists, Hamas, the Houthis, and Iran are all in the same camp. Hey, how can you do that? France is sanctioning Israel on one hand while going to fight the Houthis on the other. Hey, in short, it is all a big mess right now, do you see? Those with ability and those without must all show off their capabilities; this is actually a good thing. Once everyone is mobilized, you can finally see who is truly capable, right? And what is interesting here is this Israeli, uh, no, not Israeli, this British Labour Party person.

Miliband, uh, what is his name? This Foreign Secretary Miliband is actually a Jew himself. When he was interviewed by the BBC, he specifically said: "I am a proud British Jew." He said: "I visited Israel in my childhood, and I have long supported Israel, but based on my personal experience and the experiences of thousands of British Jews, we must have an attitude toward what Israel is doing wrong, you understand?" So, you see, Britain found this Foreign Secretary from the Labour Party, specifically choosing a British Jew, implying that a Jew is attacking a Jew, so it is not Britain attacking Israel. We are not talking about a Muslim here, nor a person of Chinese descent, right?

They are playing a very ruthless game! Then this British Labour Foreign Secretary said: "Look, we are not saying we want to erase Israel's existence, but we must take these sanctions, right?" He said: "These sanctions are something we must do! This is because what you are doing in the West Bank reminds people of the terrible history Jews have suffered for centuries." He said: "You, this Hamas war after October 7th, this is the war in Gaza where Hamas fought back, right? Although you have the right to protect your people and territory, it does not mean that what you are doing in Gaza is justified." I tell you, they are putting on a show of political correctness, protecting terrorists just like that. Hey, if you think, "Oh, maybe Gaza is indeed quite miserable," and "Are these terrorists still around? You think back to October 7th, how many could be left? Haven't they been wiped out? The Gaza peace agreement has been signed, oh, has Israel really gone too far?"

Hey, let me show you an example that just came out these past two days in the Netherlands. Look, this person in the tweet, who is this? This is a student from Gaza who received a scholarship from Maastricht University in the Netherlands. He went to the Netherlands to study after the October 7th massacre. Now, why is this person being exposed?

His gesture is one with jihadist significance. The reason he is being exposed now is because while he was studying in the Netherlands, he had 30,000 followers on Instagram—not big, but he counts as an influencer. He posted photos, including those supporting jihad, and also posts about his own brother, Ahmed, who supposedly died as a martyr for jihad in Gaza or the West Bank—meaning he was killed in a terrorist attack or failed, or was killed in retaliation.

Then, in his posts, he not only supports such terrorist acts but also explicitly says: "Oh, I pray to Allah that my life ends in the same way." What does that mean? It means he considers his extremist brother who died for jihad as his role model, and he also hopes to sacrifice his life in the same way. Wow!

Scary, right? And you know what? He even posted a video online himself. In the video, which is about October 7th, he points to footage of the October 7th massacre, where there are masked Hamas members, right? He explains in the video: "Look at these masked armed personnel, that is me." On October 7th, he was very proud that he was one of those masked armed personnel. Because this video was later reported, the school has now temporarily suspended him.

Do you see? Hey, I haven't heard that he has been arrested or anything yet; I haven't heard any news about that. Such a terrorist, a little terrorist—well, I can't call him little. He participated in October 7th; do you know if he killed anyone? And now in the Netherlands, he was invited with a scholarship, right? And there is currently no mention of filing a case against him or anything. But the Netherlands, at the same time—the Netherlands, following the US, uh, no, following Britain, in early September.

One of the countries joining twelve nations in sanctioning Israel and opposing its ethnic cleansing, right? Although the first batch was the core vanguard of Britain, France, and Canada, immediately announcing sanctions against Israel on September 8th, right? The sanctions will take effect immediately. The Netherlands didn't waste much time either; the Netherlands actually passed a domestic law in advance at the end of July, which officially took effect on September 22nd. It targets Israel—equivalent to not just sanctions, but also implementing strict customs suitcase inspections for Israeli tourists and others.

See that? The Netherlands has already put it into effect! If you transport goods produced by Jews in settlements like Jordan and the West Bank, Israeli settlements, into the Netherlands, the maximum penalty is six years in prison! Oh, and as for this little Hamas, well, I haven't heard about how many years in prison he's facing, haven't heard about him being prosecuted, but buying things produced by Jews?

Six years in prison, and Jews have to undergo suitcase inspections when going through customs! Haven't heard about such strict inspections for people coming from the Gaza Strip or Palestine. Therefore, this inspection is obviously something humiliating. And why can they inspect suitcases? They said it's because they are worried that tourists from Israel might bring some.

Commodities produced in West Bank settlements into the Netherlands—for example, if you go to study in the Netherlands and bring back some small souvenir whose place of origin is a Jewish settlement in the West Bank, then I'm sorry, after it's found during a suitcase inspection, you might also face up to six years in prison. That's how it works. If they could do such strict inspections, I find it hard to believe that so many.

Terrorists could flow into these countries, so these events are truly turning black into white. Why did I say yesterday that these mainstream media outlets were right there at the first moment? It's just a squabble, just a dispute. See it clearly now? There is much more to this than meets the eye. Then, speaking of yesterday's Israeli plane incident, there was also a little hero, let's show you again. Yesterday we showed you the deeds of the captain, the dentist, and that main plumber hero. Today this little girl is exposed, look at that! Especially cute, especially pretty. This little girl is named Nina, and she is also said to be a—

Little hero, hold on, someone in the comments is saying this is fake, well, I didn't have this before I did the show. What is being said online is that previously this was released, and someone said this little girl heard the captain screaming while going to the toilet, woke up her mother, and then shouted to the passengers. Well, some people below say this is currently untrue, so I need to go back and check the news, because I hadn't seen this community notice before doing the show, alright? So we'll skip this for now. Okay, speaking of this, let's show you, didn't Netanyahu also say that? Saying that this suicide attacker was obviously very crazy, including shouting wildly after being subdued that he wanted to kill me, kill me. So I'm saying there's a high probability that this person had drugs in his body, had used drugs. You see, after being caught, they're still this intense, shouting these words, completely unlike a terrorist who has been caught and immediately shuts up, thinking about how not to spill secrets. I feel that this terrorist attack most likely involved drugs causing him to become extremely excited, right? And wasn't it also mentioned this morning?

Saying that the UAE's investigation found that the co-pilot was actually a very extremist religious fanatic who wouldn't even shake hands with women in daily life, and had joined Fly Dubai for less than a year. They said he was an Omani citizen, and colleagues next to him all said his behavior felt bizarre, especially completely out of place regarding religion, meaning he was very extreme, right? This matter is currently under investigation, and I see some online news saying.

The Omani co-pilot actually came from Iran, but this has not yet been officially confirmed, and we don't know yet. But look, this extremist religious fanatic wouldn't even shake hands with women normally, and people felt he was out of place. Why was he still able to successfully get hired and even fly on flights to Israel? One possibility is that someone must be behind the scenes helping him operate this matter, right? After arranging it, he happened to be the only one able to work this shift today, so he logically got onto this route. Secondly, does this also reveal another layer of meaning, which is that people usually say oh, you can't discriminate, you need political correctness, you need to respect the religious beliefs of people from various religions, etc.

But can you really say that someone with such extreme religious manifestations and extreme religious sentiments is just a matter of respecting their religious beliefs? In today's society, he can't even manage normal interactions with women, right? Whether he views women as enemies or as dirt, this state of his means he is not a normal person. This kind of abnormal person, including other very strange religious behaviors—hey, and you're telling me we need DEI, we need great love, we need to be inclusive, we need to respect them? If they say they want to wear a veil, they wear a veil; if they say they want something, we do it; if they get angry, we back down. Hey, isn't this kind of far-left 'great love' sentiment equivalent to condoning crime, condoning violence, and condoning terrorism? So I'm telling you, this way of playing—seriously, why do you think the 'great love' things pushed by communism, while seemingly full of love, are actually meant to nourish more hatred to destroy us? It's like, uh, why doesn't the U.S. implement free healthcare? The CCP's propaganda is always saying, 'Oh, look, whether it's the DSA of the Democratic Party or U.S. lawmakers like Sanders who talk about socialism pushing for free healthcare, why can't it be implemented?'

It looks like Americans are stupid, Americans are suffering the consequences of their own actions—no, that's not it. The free stuff is the most expensive, right? It's the same thing: waving the banner of 'great love,' shouting about love every day, but in the end, that's the thing that will kill you without leaving a trace, right? So look, in this, I really think we can't talk about this 'great love' anymore. You in the U.S. should also learn this lesson. Europe, honestly, it's a bit hard to have much hope for them, right? But you say Europe is still harboring these people with strange, extreme behaviors, still giving them scholarships, still putting them on a pedestal. My god, they won't even know how they died. Seriously. And over here in the UAE, this morning Maurer was very angry, and Maurer posted the UAE's statement, saying: 'How come the UAE's own official statement doesn't even mention this terrorist attack?' Saying that your statement mentions hoping to combat Islamic terrorism, but doesn't call this incident an Islamic terrorist attack, but rather calls it an 'incident.' Is this just an incident? Maurer says, isn't this an Islamic terrorist attack carried out by an Omani pilot who is a jihadist, violating the Abraham Accords?

Ah, saying that the UAE's official statement doesn't apologize here, doesn't sincerely admit this point, doesn't do this, doesn't do that. It doesn't say it will release the co-pilot's name, doesn't praise the captain and the other heroes, right? It's just trying to vaguely downplay the whole thing. And Maurer says there were four American citizens on that plane, don't forget that. Ah, look at this Ministry of Foreign Affairs—the UAE's statement—it writes: 'We are closely following the matter involving the Fly Dubai flight. The flight changed its route after flying from Dubai International Airport to Tel Aviv, and landed safely at Tabuk Airport in Saudi Arabia.' Ah, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs says this. The Attorney General has ordered a professional team to conduct an investigation. It has already been announced that an 'altercation' occurred in the cockpit. They used that word too, ah, they used that word for a verbal dispute or conflict. And then it says it prompted the staff acting as crew members at the time to intervene and ensure the plane was controlled and safe. See that? It completely erased the Israeli heroes who fought back.

It sounds as if two pilots inside were having a conflict, and the backup pilot they arranged just went over and took over, right? This matter, really, the way the UAE put it is indeed inevitable—no wonder someone like Al Rumeal hung it out and cursed it directly. And then it says, ah, now, because this plane is registered in the UAE and flies the UAE flag, the UAE has investigative jurisdiction over it. And then, this includes the ability to investigate the criminal tasks on the plane, but the investigation content includes whether the motive is linked to terrorist activities, whether it was planned in advance, or instigated by others. After this, don't believe rumors and don't spread them, wait for our official news. It really does sound quite disgusting. However, the UAE is definitely also afraid that this matter will get out of hand, so they are trying their best to downplay it, right? Like today, there was another news media outlet saying that the UAE... you could say they haven't classified it as a terrorist attack, but at least their Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement didn't rule out that it was a terrorist attack, which shows the UAE is playing some word games, right?

Then, an UAE source said, "Oh, meaning Israel rushed to conclusions before the investigation even started? This premature statement by Israel makes it impossible for us partner countries to take a side immediately," or something along those lines, starting to shift the blame. The implication is that you, Israel, also finalized your conclusion without a thorough investigation; you, Israel, rushed to conclusions too hastily, while we want to investigate slowly and cautiously, and you cannot attack us later just because we couldn't immediately keep step with you. See this? The cooperation between the UAE, a signatory to the Abraham Accords, and Israel is actually considered the best in the entire Gulf region. Yet, even before this incident has actually been carried out, a crack has immediately been driven between them. You see that? Of course, we aren't saying this will instantly drive a wedge between them and ruin everything, right? But look here, as I said yesterday, what is the Chinese Communist Party best at? Stirring things up everywhere, playing one against ten—mixing Saudi Arabia, Israel, Oman, Iran, and the UAE all together in this whirlpool.

Then they can just sit back and watch the tigers fight from the mountain! Probing here and prodding there, inevitably a crack will be opened somewhere, inevitably a seam will be split somewhere. Of course, I think this matter, right? Right now, this kind of open bickering, shouting verbal battles, and arguing in public are not really huge issues. I don't believe this matter will ultimately end up being so easily dismissed because, after all, the terrorist attack failed in the end. Moreover, by a millionth of a stroke of luck, everyone landed alive, right? Including the captain and the terrorist—they can just go and start investigating by targeting that terrorist right now, right? After all, the people are all right here. But just imagine, if this attempt had succeeded, wow, then everyone would have swarmed in, and the Chinese Communist Party would have used all these forces everywhere to launch divide-and-conquer tactics and stir up trouble on all fronts. Then goodness knows what kind of huge mess might really have been stirred up, I tell you. At the very least, Xi... Today, during the toast, he probably wouldn't have felt quite so flustered and at his wit's end. Perhaps if yesterday—whether it was the plane terrorist attack that succeeded or the terrorist attack on Fairford Air Base a few days ago—had succeeded, I feel that Xi's statement released today would have been much more composed, much more grounded in his heart, and not as panicked and desperate as he seems right now.

Well, and then, regarding Iran, things get interesting here. Look, a few days ago, the Iranian parliament shouted out that they are going to withdraw from the United Nations Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. And then? Hearing this, the Kremlin spokesperson started to state their position, saying that Russia certainly doesn't want to see Iran withdraw. They said this treaty is the cornerstone of maintaining nuclear non-proliferation, and you should remain as a signatory state and continue to stay within it. We hope this matter will be clarified, and that Iran will participate in the treaty as a responsible signatory party. Look. We have continuously received confirmation that Iran has not carried out any work to build nuclear weapons, nor does it have any plans to build them. Well, I am willing to believe you, right? I am willing to believe that Iran has no nuclear weapons and does not want to possess them, so then you shouldn't withdraw; you have to prove it to everyone, right? That is to say, look at how Russia and the US are playing good cop, bad cop at this moment. The US says, "You little punk, you want to withdraw, right? You little punk, you're the one messing with nukes, and I'm going to make all your nuclear ambitions vanish into thin air and ensure you never possess nukes for generations to come."

Russia is right here going, "Um, I believe you won't do such a thing. But precisely because you won't do such a thing, you should stay even more in this Non-Proliferation Treaty and let this treaty restrict you, right? Only in this way can your innocence be proven!" In short, both sides are coaxing Russia—coaxing Iran—not to let Iran withdraw. Why would there be talk from Iran about wanting to withdraw and so on? It's very obvious, right? Trump said that Iran is currently undergoing internal infighting, right? One faction, like Abbas Araghchi and Masoud Pezeshkian, has been saying between the lines—including on Fox News—"Oh, we don't need nuclear weapons anymore, we don't even need to live like this, we are just thinking about how to survive right now, right? We'd rather cooperate with the US." And then there is Mohsen Rezaei and others, who definitely represent more than just one faction. Rezaei is currently a prominent hardliner and recognized by the Chinese Communist Party; surely the CCP wouldn't just bet on a single horse. What if the CCP opens its eyes tomorrow morning and Rezaei has already been wiped out, what then? Therefore, the CCP is constantly buying into other forces. So here, do you know which faction came out and proposed withdrawing from the Non-Proliferation Treaty? Anyway, the US and Russia will definitely not let you just withdraw whenever you say so!

Do you think you can just withdraw or sign whenever you want? That won't work. This matter is dangerous! It affects the interests of all signatory states and the people of the whole world. Let me tell you, while Russia's statement sounds pleasant, it is actually a warning to Iran: if you try to play games here, Russia will work with other countries to settle the score with you directly! That is why Russia has also spoken out in the last two days, calling directly to the United States, saying that we should have resumed negotiations on nuclear arms control long ago, right? You see, it all happened around the same time, didn't it? Iran is stirring up trouble again, and the CCP is egging on North Korea's nuclear issue, right? Whether North Korea actually possesses nuclear weapons and whether it can be resolved is also a topic of discussion. Coupled with the CCP's own nuclear proliferation and so on, you see Russia now, seizing this momentum, once again showing goodwill to the United States, saying, 'Look, we should have restarted these imminent nuclear arms control negotiations long ago; to restart such complex negotiations, we must conduct detailed consultations,' and so on. But the CCP has actually expressed clearly before: 'Our nuclear arsenal is so small, we won't negotiate with you; none of you should come to me for negotiations.'

Do you see? It seems like Iran is making a fuss, making Russia more alert to nuclear proliferation, and then taking the initiative to show goodwill to the United States, right? 'Hey, our nuclear arms control agreement has expired, we need to discuss this properly.' Although this is happening against the backdrop of deteriorating US-Russia relations and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, this matter is too complex and must be discussed; it is in the interest of both sides. In reality, can the US not suppress the Iran issue? That is impossible. But regardless of who instigated Iran, now that it has come out and talked about withdrawing, it has naturally transitioned to the now-unstoppable US-Russia nuclear arms control. Moreover, it was specifically mentioned that among the open nuclear powers, only the CCP remains, right? But don't expect the US and Russia to take nuclear-armed Pakistan seriously, right? No matter how you look at it, that's just a side dish. The other big one is the CCP. And the CCP doesn't want to negotiate with anyone here, while secretly conducting all kinds of nuclear tests underground, right?

They don't care about mudslides today or earthquakes tomorrow, do they? They don't take humanity or the entire planet seriously at all; they have no sense of responsibility and are just lunatics. Russia and the United States have openly signaled that they will work together on this nuclear arms control issue. And because the previous one was voided, they have to conduct detailed negotiations again to talk about it now. In this process, of course, Russia will try to use this method to gain as many benefits for itself as possible. But it also tells you that you can see how naturally this has transitioned. This is another tightening noose for the CCP, another ticking time bomb. Otherwise, why is Xi forced to talk about nothing but empty words, other than 'the motherland of Taiwan must be reunified'? Do you see it now? If he talks about anything else, even if he wants to show off on National Day, saying, 'We are celebrating our 77th anniversary, we have our own 'Two Bombs, One Satellite,' our nuclear arsenal is currently expanding, and we are about to catch up with the US and Russia,' right?

'Even if we don't surpass Britain and catch up with America, we must make our nuclear arsenal as powerful as theirs.' Xi doesn't dare to say that, right? Because everyone is watching you, watching you together. The more they talk, the faster you will be finished. Isn't that the logic? As for why I said Iran's side doesn't need Russia to worry about it, just look at it. Was it last month? CNN reported that Iran... let me see where it went.

Yes, CNN reported on September 9th that analysts, after examining satellite maps, pointed out that a suspected nuclear facility in Iran, buried deep within granite—granite again, we keep hearing about granite lately, don't we?—has seen frequent construction activity this year, and the United States is considering deep underground strike options. Granite, oh, I really like this word now! What they are talking about is digging into mountains, so underground nuclear facilities in mountains are also related to granite.

Speaking of the mountainous site that intelligence agencies have been closely monitoring for a long time, CSIS recently released a satellite imagery analysis report stating that activity at this mountain site has surged sharply this year. Various developments include construction camps equipped with material storage facilities, concrete mixing plants, and reinforced roads leading to the abandoned waste dump. The site has been leveled, and the debris and rocks excavated from the tunnel surface have been cleared, indicating that the excavation work has come to an end. Additionally, there are new ring routes possibly allowing for two-way continuous traffic, and a continuous increase in vehicles and mechanical equipment at the camp, and so on. This compares the changes in activity conditions at the mountain site over a nearly one-year period between late September of last year and early August of this year. Furthermore, Israeli intelligence also indicates that Iran may be trying to transfer centrifuges to the mountain site for uranium enrichment. Therefore, hasn't Trump also mentioned multiple times that who says the mountain site won't be struck? It might happen soon, and anyway, we know it very well, right? We have discussed all of this before.

Then the CSIS report mentions that, facing the Pentagon's heaviest non-nuclear bombs, this granite mountain is extremely difficult to conquer. Moreover, this is not the only Iranian nuclear facility believed to exceed the limits of existing weapon strikes. So you see, Trump says Xi understands granite very well. Yes, Xi definitely thinks that given the limits of existing weapons, what is Fordow? What is old Khamenei? If you don't give this mountain a strike to see, Xi will never believe that his granite will be penetrated. Therefore, as we know, the last CSIS report stated that Patriots might not be enough, and if the CCP is hit for 30 days of high-intensity strikes, they will be exhausted. I said at the time that the CCP has a bad brain. People said that using saturation attacks with Patriots for 30 days would exhaust them, and you actually went and bragged, saying, "Oh, if they hit for 30 days, he won't have Patriots left." If you put Xi right there, could he last 30 days? Xi has a granite brain, and he cannot withstand 30 days of Patriot strikes, right? We are just saying that this bunch of blockheads and knuckleheads in the Chinese Communist State are feigning ignorance while understanding the situation.

They are just fooling Xi; isn't that extremely despicable? Look, just when they said that Patriots might not be enough, and the CCP hadn't even cheered for two days, our show told everyone: didn't Lockheed Martin's AIM-260 come out? That's not called an existing weapon; that's a newly exposed but already mass-produced new weapon. Right? So you see, the CSIS team said that earlier: the limit of existing weapons is extremely difficult to overcome. But that limit is only the limit publicly disclosed by the US; it didn't tell you what the actual limit is, did it? However, even CSIS and CNN said there are signs that the US is still developing strike methods targeting such deep underground granite facilities.

CNN reported that four days before Operation Epic Fury was launched, in late January—no, in late February—a covert agency under the Pentagon responsible for countering weapons of mass destruction signed a $1.2 million emergency contract, which was proven to be used for repairing a unique underground test facility at the White Sands Missile Launch Site in New Mexico, in order to conduct live-fire tests aimed at verifying classified strike capabilities against rapidly rising threats. In other words, this document from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) was uploaded to the database the day before old Khamenei was struck. This timing is very interesting.

Then this memo also specifically mentions that due to a time-sensitive national security directive, this task was awarded to a construction company called Pete. Furthermore, it states that this rapid test preparation project must be completed within two to three weeks. Hey, listen to this, a project as big as $1.2 million to verify live-fire tests of classified strike capabilities against rapidly rising threats, and moreover to be completed in two to three weeks. Hey, to be honest, I feel that the cost for the US to do these things is not as high as the CCP claims. The CCP always says, oh, the US military buys a chair for $500 or $5,000; there are many public-facing projects whose funding is allocated to these, but in fact, they also have their own internal accounts, right? But to be honest, you make fun of the US every day saying, oh, it's so expensive to do things, how come, $1.2 million, I think based on the description, it's just 10 million RMB, right?

It really isn't expensive. In your Chinese Communist State, don't you casually put together a PPT that costs tens of millions of RMB? And you still can't complete it that quickly, and the PPT you make is completely irrelevant, with many images plucked from American videos and materials, right? But really, I think if the US can complete such an important project in two to three weeks for $1.2 million, then just think, where have the US's hundreds of billions or trillions of defense expenditures gone this year? How many projects have they done, and the Chinese Communist State still thinks the US is riddled with holes? Oh my god, ignorance is truly fearless, isn't it?

Looking at this, three informed sources told CNN that the testing plan is directly linked to a potential US-Iran war, intended to open a path to strike Iran's deepest underground facilities, and is highly likely to simulate the live-fire destruction of specific nuclear facilities by the US. A senior US military general confirmed to Congress last year that the Pentagon determined the MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator) could not penetrate the Isfahan facility buried deep underground, and at that time, it only blocked the facility's entry and exit points. Therefore, CNN believes that based on sources, contracts, or testimonies, it only indicates a possibility, not a certainty.

Regardless, this is something the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) did not anticipate. You see, the US military says it is currently going all out to develop the next generation of bunker busters to replace the active MOP and enhance its ability to strike extremely deep underground targets. The prototype development contract was signed last September, and the Air Force also publicly solicited proposals for new weapons from the defense industry in June. This is all public information. You must remember, before so much of this public information was released, you didn't know that US laser weapons were already ready, nor did you see that the AIM-260 air-to-air missiles were already in mass production, right? So, looking just at the CNN report, between February 16 and February 18, CNN discovered through commercial satellite imagery that there was excavation work at a remote plot at the White Sands test site, stating that this site is dedicated to testing the damage effects of weapons on deeply buried targets. It is said that this indeed highly matches the emergency contract. Then, satellite imagery showed that this place is called the 'Backup In-Situ Hard Rock Seismic Test Site.' See? As shown in this image, the excavation at this site seems to have lasted for several weeks, and then the construction activity seemed to pause.

The assessment report says this environment is similar to Fordow, and the White Sands facility is also used within hard granite mountains. My god, granite again! Trump said, 'You understand granite, you only understand granite.' Do you really think granite can protect you? Right? Who doesn't have granite? Seriously, it's too funny! This granite meme really won't go away.

And then? CNN said they couldn't independently verify that. However, informed sources said the US military retains the means for a full-scale strike on Fordow, and it was even selected as an alternative strike target list this summer. Sources also said that the strike plan for Fordow involves using some of the most powerful heavy bombs in the US arsenal. But whether it is guaranteed to be destroyed? It is currently unknown, right? Just listen to this statement; it is very conservative. For example, before we hit Fordow, the US military could also say, 'I don't know what the final result will be; it's also a limit, it might work, it might not.'

They can say that because there hasn't been a limit operation where so many B-2s dropped so many bunker busters through a hole the size of half a refrigerator door into the same target in a short time, so I don't know what will happen. I can't say it will be 100% successful. Can you say this proves the US military is incompetent? To put it bluntly, if there is no guarantee that it can go through a hole the size of half a refrigerator door, can it hit one the size of a whole refrigerator door? Can it hit a hole in a large freezer? It's not impossible; what they want is a perfect strike. Before it's actually done, they will always say, 'Oh, that's a limit, I'm not sure, it remains unknown.' But if the CCP thinks that its granite will protect it for ten thousand years, that's really hard to say. You might as well take that granite and, like when someone gets injured and gets a steel plate on their skull, if there's a hole, you patch it, right? You might as well replace your head, your skull, with granite, and since you don't have many brain cells anyway, right? You can just replace your brain with granite too. Then it would indeed take some effort to strike it, and the US might not have expected you to play like that, is that the logic? Anyway, your original brain wasn't of much use, so you might as well replace it with granite.

Then it says here that sources also mentioned that recently the Department of War (Pentagon) held a special 'sprint' seminar, and there was analysis saying that there might be various enriched uranium purification and centrifuge assembly facilities inside Fordow, and continuous reinforcement, etc., so they must be careful. Although it has been confirmed that there will be enriched uranium inside, it is not yet known whether it currently meets the conditions. That means, in fact, what the US is saying to the outside world is 'I'm not ready yet,' or 'Oh, it seems to exceed the limit,' but in reality, it is telling everyone that Iran cannot use Fordow directly yet, and they can't be inside it right now either; they are also racing against time. So, the US is just watching to see what other tricks you can pull out. Wait until you've exhausted your tricks, just like those terrorists who drove three cars to the gate of the Fairford base and were then caught—is that the state of things? In the CCP-controlled land, granite, granite... oh, we really have to say, you really are a granite expert! Trump said: 'My research is different from yours; I specialize in researching ways to hit granite, right?' We each have our own expertise! Alright, let's talk about this for today, same time tomorrow.