Machine translation · the Chinese original is authoritative · View original

Philippine Defense Secretary Accuses China of Disrespecting International Law

1# · OP Author:美国之音中文网 Published:2026-09-09 20:27 Replies:0 Views:11 Permalink:fanzei.net/d_xfkp5q
Voice of America Chinese website published a video: Philippine Defense Secretary Accuses China of Disrespecting International Law Video link:
Full text: I have a note here, which I think came from the Chinese side. Please allow me to read it. "China's position on the South China Sea Arbitration case is clear, consistent, and firm. They have no position. The arbitration violated the basic principles of international law. Therefore, the UNCLOS that you signed is in violation of international law, is that what it means? The so-called ruling is illegal, invalid, and is your way of saying it. And it is not binding, because you do not want the constraints of the UNCLOS. I want to ask you, when I was taking questions at the venue, this paper was handed to me, is this practice appropriate, and how should such behavior be handled. This is not only a lack of respect, if this is how the Chinese side expresses its position to me, then this practice is not only a disrespect to international law, throwing the UNCLOS on the ground and trampling it willfully. It is also a disregard for the basic courtesy that should be given to our warm host South Korea and the audience. Perhaps, what China needs is basic decency and etiquette. Thank you very much.
Key events timeline · Selected related nodes
2026年9月
菲律宾官员公开反驳中国使馆纸条
在首尔安全对话会场上,菲律宾官员公开朗读中国使馆递交的南海立场纸条并进行当场反驳,批评中方不尊重国际法及《联合国海洋法公约》,同时指责这种行为漠视东道主韩国及与会者的礼仪。
Related topics 中国 国际关系 国际法 菲律宾 国际形象
Transcript · timestamped
我这里有一张纸条,我想是中国迷来的。请允许我读一下:“中国在南海仲裁案上的立场,是明确、一贯和坚定的。他们没有立场。该仲裁违反了国际法的基本原则”
所以,你们签署的《联合国海洋法公约》便,违反了国际法,是个意思吗。“所谓裁决是非法的、无效的,是你们的说法。且不具约束力。--因为你们不想要《联合国海洋法公约》的约束。”我想问你,当我在会场接受提问时,递给我这张纸,这种做法合适吗?
和如何将应对这种行为?这不仅不尊重,如果这是中方对我表达的立场,那么这种做法不仅是对国际法的不尊重,将《联合国海洋法公约》扔在地上肆意践踏
而且是对我们热情的东道主韩国以及各位听众,应有的基本礼貌的漠视。也许,中国需要的,就是基本的体面与礼仪。谢谢非常多。
Replies (0)

No replies yet — be the first to comment

Post a reply