Xi Jinping Resuscitated Three Times in a Week! Dragging His Sick Body to Visit the United States, is a Coup at the Fifth Plenary Session of the Beijing Central Committee Imminent? Huawei Founder's Entire Family Disappears, iPhone 18 Counters and Overwhelms Patriotic Triple-Fold Phone

The video revolves around Xi Jinping's physical discomfort, rumors of his death, and the CCP's announcement of his visit to the US from September 23 to 25. It analyzes He Lifeng's early trip to the US for negotiations, the theme of the Fifth Plenary Session, and its connection to intra-party power struggles. At the same time, it discusses rumors regarding Ren Zhengfei and Meng Wanzhou's family leaving the country, the suspected suicide/fall of a Huawei employee, and how rumors spread in an environment of restricted information both inside and outside China.

Video Link:

Full Text:

This week has been quite fascinating. Guess how many times Xi Jinping supposedly died last week? Three times, with a total of four resurrections, including Huawei's mega-tycoon Ren Zhengfei, whose whole family apparently also "died" twice last week. Further updates on these so-called rumors about Huawei's family, or whether they are actually true, will be covered in the second half—it's going to be very interesting.

Let's first talk about everyone's patriarch, good father, Chief Accelerator, and Daddy Xi. Today, the CCP officially announced that Xi Jinping is about to set off for a visit to the US. So, where did Xi Jinping's first "death" happen last week? It was his physical discomfort at the G20 summit in India. Everyone saw that footage, which even caused him to miss that night's banquet and urgently return to Beijing the next day.

In fact, The Wall Street Journal disclosed that Xi Jinping was indeed feeling unwell that evening, which is why he skipped the banquet. On the afternoon when the news of his illness broke out, wasn't Xi Jinping asked by Indian Prime Minister Modi, "Are you okay?" This was captured by Russian media cameras, revealing that his translation earpiece had actually malfunctioned. Xi Jinping didn't know how to use it and couldn't understand basic English, so everyone present rushed to help him fix the earpiece.

But actually, this doesn't conflict with the fact that Xi Jinping was indeed feeling unwell that day, right? It got so bad that by the banquet, he couldn't hold on and had to cancel, leaving Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to sub in for him. Sometimes we don't need to view things in a binary way—saying it must be either this or that. Could both things have happened at the same time? It's entirely possible. At this summit, Xi Jinping's earpiece indeed malfunctioned, and Xi Jinping indeed felt unwell that evening; the two are completely consistent.

Where did Xi Jinping's second "death" take place? It was the day he hurriedly rushed back to Beijing and went to the 301 Hospital for emergency treatment, reportedly in critical condition. And then what about the third time? Xi Jinping was supposedly on the verge of kicking the bucket, right? And some of Zhang Youxia's former subordinates supposedly went to the 301 Hospital to pressure Xi Jinping into a coup—the tenth coup attempt. How do you launch a coup against someone who is already in critical condition, lying there on life support, and unconscious? Are you going to point a gun at him and say, "Are you going to abdicate now?" He wouldn't even be able to speak. Logically speaking, that's just how it is, right?

Then finally on September 19, Comrade Xi Jinping passed away without medical rescue, kept strictly secret. Next, did you notice that starting from September 19, on Twitter—which is now X—and also on Threads, what began to appear? A large number of obituaries for Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping, finally dead. And what else did they say? That his death would only be announced in October.

Then subsequently, over the weekend, official organs of the the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) announced that they would dispatch He Lifeng to the United States for negotiations. This was interpreted by numerous netizens to mean that the rumor of Xi Jinping kicking the bucket on September 19 seemed to be true. Why? Because Xi Jinping wasn't visiting the U.S. anymore; instead, he sent He Lifeng. Who is He Lifeng? The Vice Premier of the the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Actually, He Lifeng specializes in finance and commerce.

Now, summit meetings between leaders of major powers are normally just going through the motions and following a formality, which I believe everyone probably knows. Do you think real negotiations would ever happen right in front of reporters at a summit? What happens if the talks collapse? It must be that two or three days before, or even a week prior, commercial negotiation teams or any negotiation delegations from both sides were already dispatched to talk, right?

So He Lifeng's departure this time, going ahead to talk with U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent, negotiating all the way until September 23, and only then would Xi Jinping depart on September 23—this is the tradition of past administrations. Moreover, the closer the negotiation time is to the day of the leader's arrival, the more it proves that the two countries actually couldn't come to terms for a long time. Otherwise, how could it be that just before the leader is about to leave, your final negotiations are only wrapping up? This would not be the kind of behavior exhibited between two friendly countries, right? It must be full of hostility, or a lack of mutual trust between each other, for such logic and such a format to exist.

Including the last time Trump visited Beijing, do you remember what happened this May? U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent and whom? He Lifeng again. Where did the negotiations start first? Inside the VIP lounge of Incheon Airport in South Korea. And what does this represent? That things weren't sorted out beforehand, so they hastily and hurriedly had to negotiate in the airport VIP lounge in South Korea, right? After finishing the talks, with both sides reaching a slight consensus, they then departed for Beijing to welcome Trump's arrival.

So you see, in May the U.S. and China negotiated this way, and now in September the U.S. and China are still negotiating this way. Do you really think these talks have any substance? Between the two countries, well, I, the United States, won't suppress China anymore, I'll let China continue this rise of the East and decline of the West, let it continue to make the money from Americans like it used to—orders coming back? Impossible.

So what do the U.S. and China want? To put it bluntly, what the U.S. wants, what Trump wants, isn't it the midterm elections in late November and December, so that their Republican Party can consolidate its position during the re-elections, or even win more seats? And what does Xi Jinping want? In this massive upheaval and chaotic economy, how to further prevent the Little Pinks from feeling any fluctuating, North Korea-fication.

So all of this has completely nothing to do with whether Xi Jinping is dead or not. And right today, official organs of the the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officially announced—didn't he just schedule a visit to Washington from the 23rd to the 25th? And at this exact moment, the factions of both sides are at daggers drawn. Local the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) embassy personnel are mobilizing Little Pinks and international students, as well as pro-CCP Chinese-Americans, to organize teams.

However, as an aside, what makes us Taiwanese laugh is still that the daily stipend for protestors is 60 USD. You shouldn't think 1,800 is a lot; it hasn't gone up at all in the U.S., and that's the key point. U.S. economic inflation has been running hot for years, yet the protest stipend money you hand out is the exact same amount as the protest stipends from Tsai Ing-wen's or Lai Ching-te's visits to the U.S. three or four years ago. This equals saying that American wages are rising, but the money the Chinese and the the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) give to Chinese people in America hasn't risen, while prices are going up—isn't that losing face and making a fool of oneself?

What does this prove? Wherever you have contact with the the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), no matter which country you are in, you are forever trapped in that kind of involution, wages, exploitation, and middlemen characteristic of the CCP's country, right? I bet you that these 60 USD have definitely been subcontracted layer upon layer and exploited layer upon layer by those above. The CCP Central Committee might issue 300 USD per person to the the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) embassy, but by the time it changes hands it drops to 260, 200, 160, one hundred fifty or sixty dollars, and perhaps what finally ends up in your hand is just a bottle of water and a nutritious lunch, a hamburger—a Burger King.

Meanwhile, various factions of rebels from California, Texas, and New York have also gathered in Washington to protest against Xi Jinping. And our rebel good friends will also go to the scene to play this video of our cross-strait peoples' hero, Guan Zhang, for Xi Jinping's motorcade and the local Pinks to listen to.

As Taiwanese, we can say whatever today—Xi Jinping's wife, I can do it right away, I know what his wife is doing anyway. If I want to pat her butt, I'll pat her butt. Xi Jinping, the police didn't come. Where are the police? The police are right here. I want to congratulate the Guanzhang on taking his business venture in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) country to the next level in the future. At the Fifth Plenary Session in late October, becoming a member of the Politburo Standing Committee is none other than you. Back in the day, when Xi Jinping entered the Politburo Standing Committee for the first time, he was actually in last place. You can definitely take him down; at least you can be second to last, right? Otherwise, how could you forcibly marry his wife?

I must tell everyone about something that accelerates things even further. The official announcement of this Fifth Plenary Session states that it will be personally hosted by Xi Jinping, and the theme is to study major issues concerning the persistent and comprehensive promotion of strict Party governance. Okay, let's highlight this. Persistent? And what else? Strict Party governance. What does this represent? Xi Jinping and his cronies will achieve the historical positioning of “I shall have no self,” pushing China further toward North Koreanization and an era of autocracy.

Meeting also particularly emphasized that outstanding problems faced in Party building must be well-rectified and resolved. Persistence, certain major issues, outstanding problems, a series of issues will all be proposed and resolved at this meeting. So what does this prove? Indeed, over the past five years of this term, Xi Jinping has faced a great deal of political struggle and challenges, even coercion to step down, right? It's just that they all failed.

Therefore, Xi Jinping's political power has been challenged multiple times, which is why the theme of this Fifth Plenary Session—as he moves toward his fourth term—became what it is: strict Party governance, right? Even if Xi Jinping is currently winning completely, speaking from a realistic and objective perspective, even if he is now 100% victorious, deep down Xi Jinping does not believe he is 100% victorious.

Do you know what? He still feels unsafe, so he holds suspicion, doubt, and demands absolute loyalty from everyone. This also explains why the theme of this Fifth Plenary Session is strict Party governance.

However, as a Taiwanese, I must sincerely praise this: Xi Jinping must absolutely not step down before the CCP perishes. The demise of the CCP will definitely go down into the garbage heap of history together with Xi Jinping. If Xi Jinping were to be suddenly replaced by someone else right now, or if it's not his cronies who succeed him, I believe Taiwan would be in danger. Therefore, I am very glad that Xi Jinping has entered the middle-to-late Chongzhen Emperor era. Okay, laughing session over.

Let's talk about a more serious issue: why are these rumors getting more exaggerated with each version? If you go back and look at that trajectory: fainting, emergency treatment, critical condition, dying, war zones shifting, military takeover, civil war and fragmentation. Not a single piece of news suggested that Xi Jinping was indeed in poor health, rested in the hospital for a few days, improved slightly, and could go to the US—no, not a single version like that, right?

Because what those rumors described was not Xi Jinping's real condition at all, but rather the outcome that the people spreading those things or those factions wished to see. You know, if someone simply wants to know the truth, they would accept that it might just be a minor ailment, or that his foot is genuinely acting up and he needs a hip replacement, right? But that week, every version rejected the other, and they kept escalating, becoming more exaggerated: from fainting to emergency treatment, from emergency treatment to critical condition, from critical condition to mutiny, from mutiny to fragmentation, and from fragmentation to the destruction of the entire China. That was just writing a wish list, I know that too.

But I must also say that the so-called rumor-mongers that you all think of—their situation in China, especially domestically, and even overseas, is subject to surveillance. You cannot just speak directly like that; you can only guess, you can only talk about it, you can only use more cryptic ways, and then have people outside the firewall help you retell it. That kind of process, right?

So the true ultimate sources and origins of these rumors all come from within the Great Firewall of China and inside China. So what does this prove? The sentiment of the people inside the firewall, the grassroots common folks—and let's not even say grassroots, at least the middle class—are no longer standing on Xi Jinping's side. Therefore, they can only use this method, casting this kind of ballot on overseas platforms, to express their protest against Xi Jinping.

Of course, the greater price is yet to come. If a real crisis ever happens one day, if one day Xi Jinping actually kicks the bucket, and someone really reports it in the very first instance, no one will actually believe it. You see, people will say, "Here we go again, he has already died 16 times this week. What can we do, right?" Every piece of fake news and death rumor helps the CCP build another firewall. Therefore, the impression people might have in the future is: Are all bad news stories about the CCP fake?

Next is another highlight we just mentioned. In the past two weeks, wasn't there a rumor that Huawei's big boss, Chairman Ren Zhengfei, and Meng Wanzhou, his eldest princess, right, had their entire family fleeing China, moving from a Shenzhen minivan to some overseas isolated island, and finally running off to the United States? As a result, didn't the younger daughter make a public appearance at some movie promotional event in Beijing last week, on September 14 or 15? That pretty much served as a half-slap in the face to this rumor.

Why do I say it's a half-slap? Because some netizens brilliantly filled in the loophole. They said, yes, Ren Zhengfei and his eldest princess's family all fled, but what was the price of the exchange? His younger daughter, the second princess, Miss Yao, had to stay in Beijing as a hostage, kind of like back in the old days, right? Wasn't it like the States of Qin, Zhao, and Qi exchanging their own princesses or young masters to act as hostages, right?

So because she was locked up in Beijing, envying her sister and father for being able to go to the United States to enjoy a wonderful life, she was super pissed and unwilling to accept it, so she fiercely chewed out netizens: "I can find underworld thugs and police to fuck and finish off you bottom-feeding Chinese people at any time."

Just in these past two days, while Xi Jinping was dying again, there were also stories circulating trending on X about Ren Zhengfei and the eldest princess Meng Wanzhou experiencing a free fall, creating a huge buzz. This time they even attached photos, you know?

If we push the timeline back a bit further, you can roughly understand why such rumors appeared. Because on September 11, there were many employees at the Huawei Shenzhen company who, due to long-term failure to get their unpaid wages, collectively did a high-altitude bungee jump without tying the rope. There was no news or CCTV reporting on it, right? But the rumor that Ren Zhengfei's family did a high-altitude bungee jump without tying their ropes caused a massive uproar.

Even if CCTV doesn't report it, this indeed caused a massive uproar overseas. An 81-year-old patriotic pride ended up like that, with over 100,000 reposts. I am talking about reposts, so only this kind of news can reach the forefront of the trending topics. As for a group of ordinary people, even if the number is 100 people, unpaid outsourced workers doing a free fall, the level of discussion about this is extremely low, both within the firewall and even overseas.

Actually, the news that Ren Zhengfei's family died, or fled, was not completely groundless. Why do I say that? From September 17 to 19, Huawei's 11th All-Connect Conference opened in Shanghai, right? This is Huawei's most important event of the year. But the officially published roster not only lacked the big boss Ren Zhengfei, but even Meng Wanzhou and such an opening ceremony—she didn't even make an appearance, none at all, right?

You could say Ren Zhengfei is advanced in age and not attending, which I think is quite normal. But the eldest princess, the second princess, and no one from the Ren family attending the standing committee and board of directors—disappearing from this stage is also why people have this speculation.

And indeed, during those days, news came out that Huawei's CEO could not be contacted, nor could those giants of the Ren family. From the perspective of Chinese people seeing these words—"cannot contact Chairman Ren"—they might think he has fled, or he might have been taken away for investigation. Why? Because we have seen it happen too many times.

Didn't Jack Ma give a speech criticizing regulation at the Bund Summit, and then disappear from the public eye for an super long time? Following that, you all know what fate Jack Ma met. In December 2015, Chairman Guo of Fosun Group also lost contact, and the company later stated he was assisting judicial authorities with an investigation. Only a few days later did he reappear in the public eye.

In February 2023, China Renaissance also announced they could not contact founder Bao Fan, and 10 days later changed their tune to say he was cooperating with relevant CCP authorities in an investigation. So do you see these scripts? Losing contact, going missing, and continuing to cooperate with investigations a few days later.

Moreover, Huawei is an even bigger, much bigger company this time, right? There hasn't been a single notice, a single word, or a single confirmation, and they have to resort to having the younger daughter go crazy to cover up these so-called rumors? Well, its opening happens to be the standard opening for Chinese big bosses getting into trouble, right?

So it's not that everyone inside the Great Firewall of China is simply fooled by these rumors and gossip; it's that this is the only version available for them to reference step by step. Therefore, if we look at the social climate and public opinion in China today, a qualitative change is taking place that is beyond the imagination of the thinking logic and mindset of individuals raised in non-democratic countries.

If you look at it using our own way of thinking, you will certainly feel that the place is full of lies and rumors—how could they possibly be so wildly exaggerated and preposterous? Yet precisely in such an environment, you are forced to rely on these very rumors. Each rumor might be nine parts false and one part true, so you have to sift through this multitude of rumors to find that single strand of truth, to piece together the few pieces of information closest to reality. Otherwise, in the People's Republic of China, you cannot publish 100% of the truth.