Have Xi Jinping and Cai Qi Fallen Out Again? Li Qiang Slams the Cult of Personality; Hu Chunhua's Secret Meeting Turns Dramatic; Wen Jiabao Makes His Move at the Fifth Plenum? The CCP Declares "Individuals Bear Primary Responsibility for Their Own Elderly Care"; Musk Hands Out Shares to American Kids! (Old Beijing Teahouse / Episode 1779 / 2026 / 10 / 20)
This episode mainly explores the latest trends in China's high-level political scene, including discussions on personality cults triggered by think tank articles, the whereabouts of Cai Qi, and rumors of a secret meeting with Hu Chunhua. At the same time, it focuses on the strong social backlash caused by the Shandong Civil Affairs Department's proposal that "individuals are the primary responsibility for their own elderly care," and analyzes this in conjunction with rumors of corruption in the social security fund and the phenomenon of taking out loans to pay social security premiums. The program concludes by comparing the philanthropic initiatives of US tech giant Anthropic and Elon Musk, who are distributing shares to the public and children, with the US government's childcare and subsidy programs.
Video link:
Full text:
As the saying goes, the "Red Horse and Red Sheep" (years of calamity) are impossible to guard against. It's happening again—no, not happening again, I mean no matter how much you try to guard against it, you couldn't have predicted that Li Qiang, the vase-like second-in-command who was propped up just a couple of days ago, would suddenly soar to the heavens and pull a straight face to lecture his "Big Daddy" Xi Jinping. You can't just let my waist go; if I don't twist it for two days, you say this, and my waist is already twisted three days early. On October 16, 2026, the [Development Research Center of the State Council Think Tank] under the CCP State Council
Forwarding a powerful article titled "Resolutely Oppose the Cult of Personality: Deep Logic, Keeping the Mission in Mind, Party Constitution Determination, and Breaking Historical Malpractices." Wait a minute, Xi Jinping has established "one-man supremacy" and made the final decision; the Party's strong leadership core has been abolished by "Little Qiangzi" (Li Qiang), effectively shot dead. The fact that Li Qiang's State Council research center and his own political and economic think tank actually forwarded such an article—you say it wasn't intentional? Even "Little Qiangzi" himself couldn't justify that. Whether he was set up by insiders or got carried away and attempted a palace coup, it is completely unclear. "Ignorance is bliss," let's move on. Anyway, regardless of whose responsibility it is, let's talk about what this powerful article said. It was written in a very righteous tone, mentioning that the CCP Party Constitution is the supreme criterion for governing the Party. Criteria can be changed at will, right? Opposing the cult of personality is essentially defending democratic centralism, upholding the Party's collective leadership, and sticking to the people's principal position. I'm going to vomit. The core is Xi Jinping—no, wait, the core is clarifying the fundamental logic that the political party is greater than the individual, the system is greater than authority, and the people are greater than the leader. Wait, hold on, the core is no longer called Xi Jinping? It's called the political party is greater than the individual and the people are greater than the leader? Isn't that a bit abstract? Ah, if Li Qiang dared to say this to "Baozi" (Xi Jinping) to his face, Old Xi would slap him across the face. It's a classic case of looking for trouble. It's hard to say. The article is very targeted, and it has become a "spicy" article again. It points out extremely sharply that opposing the cult of personality is not a phased political requirement, but a political stance that must be adhered to for the long term, and is the fundamental guideline for comprehensively and strictly governing the Party and purifying the political ecology within the Party. I am completely confused. Who said before that Old Xi's strict governance of the Party at the Fifth Plenary Session was to knock on all the tables to scare all the cats, especially all the "those"? Almost everyone said that, because before the Fifth Plenary Session, Old Xi released signed articles around the time of Zhang Youxia's downfall, clearly meant to beat, warn, and scare the anti-Xi forces within the Party, launching a final general offensive against the "Old Senate" faction behind them by attacking the "two-faced people" and "ship-jumpers." You say Old Xi's chair is riding a rollercoaster, isn't it? Sitting there peacefully, suddenly he starts shouting and jumping around. How crazy is he? It's no wonder some say he's gone "snake-crazy" (mentally ill). The State Council, whose backbone was long ago broken by Old Xi, actually dared to resolutely oppose the cult of personality and mentioned maintaining collective leadership again. This is specifically "touching the sore spot" and is in the rhythm of scalding the General Secretary to death with a cup of old tea. So, some netizens analyzed that this shows the high-level struggle has reached a white-hot stage—so hot it's turning white.
Alright.
A laugh a day keeps the years away.
New tea friends, click [Subscribe] and the little bell immediately.
Welcome to join the tea house's joyful journey.
Look at the world from a different angle with the brothers.
Let your mood improve.
Subscription is free.
Press the subscribe button.
You can continuously harvest laughter.
Alright, back to the story. As everyone knows, the CCP propaganda department is chanting "two establishes, four consciousnesses, four self-confidences, two upholds" all day long, making final decisions and sweeping everything up. Do you want to scare this "weightlifting champion" who carries 200 jin of wheat on mountain roads? No. Anyway, once these details were revealed, it reminded people whether the fierce infighting between the anti-Xi faction led by veterans like Wen Jiabao and Li Ruihuan and Xi Jinping's "Xi Army" has been exposed to the outside. Needless to say, everyone knows this. The problem is that "Little Qiangzi" was brought up by Xi Jinping himself. Striking back and flicking Old Xi on the forehead—what does this mean? The meaning is extremely treacherous. The platform blogger and political/economic commentator PGY posted expressing confusion: Li Qiang hasn't even ascended to the top position yet, and his think tank dares to so blatantly and grandiosely hit Xi's soft underbelly—the cult of personality. Unless there is a secret deal to deliberately hand a knife to the anti-Xi forces, you can scare "Long Long" (Xi) even more.
A netizen who is well-versed in CCP rhetoric knocked on his own head for a long time and figured out this line of thinking: This is Li Qiang following Xi's orders to deliberately release a smokescreen, practicing Mao Zedong's "luring the snake out of the hole." Ah, it belongs to the typical "fishing law enforcement." My god, it's so hard to guard against! This shows that the struggle has reached a white-hot stage, so white-hot that master and servant are inverted and everyone is a "frightened bird." Li Qiang slams the table to scare "Xi Jin-cat," and "Ping-zi" has turned into a cat. The surprise came very suddenly. This is an era of heavy, sudden events. Liu Zhuo was actually right about this: the pulse of the Xi era is all kinds of sudden events.
Have you tea lovers noticed that during Xi Jinping's recent inspection tour of Inner Mongolia, his shadow and faithful lackey Cai Qi was noticeably absent and didn't tag along to serve him? That's right, why didn't Cai Qi go? Exactly, and this happens to be the most turbulent and unstable juncture of the political landscape right before the Fifth Plenary Session. The leader of the Chinese Communist Party went out all alone, wrapped up in a big scarf, shivering in the biting autumn wind. Doesn't that look a bit isolated and weak, with rather ominous signs? The last time old Xi went out in heavy, gloomy rain to lay a wreath, it was exceptionally desolate and tragic. On that very same day, Cai Qi accompanied Zhang Youxia and others to the square outside the Marco Polo Bridge near the September 18 Memorial Hall to take an oath—what they called a commemorative gathering. That was universally recognized as the most prominent evidence that Xi Jinping lost his military power after suffering a stroke. The contrast in popularity between the two sides was literally like heaven and earth. In the end, old Xi used all sorts of clumsy, self-defeating tricks, staging a surprise coup to forcibly drag Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli down from their horses. To this day, he hasn't even wiped his ass clean from that mess, and not a single person in the military is cooperating with the Steamed Bun. Coming back to Cai Qi, his recent movements have become completely baffling. What's going on? Not only did he not accompany his big daddy on his tour of Inner Mongolia, but he also reportedly held a secret meeting with former crown prince Hu Chunhua. Who did you say? Wait, could you please not scare Xi Jinping like that? Well, he's the stroke enthusiast, it has nothing to do with me, I'm not the one scaring him—this is the latest spicy rumor circulating in the streets, and today's flavor is extra hot. Rumor has it that Hu Chunhua, the deposed crown prince who was once designated as the successor across generations and was kicked out of the highest power core of the CCP four years ago, is now suddenly and prominently dragged back into Beijing's most sensitive succession rumors. Please go on. First, a mysterious list of a seven-member emergency group circulated overseas, and Hu Chunhua's name was prominently featured; Cai Qi and Peng Liyuan seemed to be in it as well. Now, there is news claiming that Xi Jinping actually used his confidant Cai Qi to proactively and secretly summon Hu Chunhua. Seriously? Old Xi personally had Hu Jintao hauled out last time precisely because of the deposed crown prince Hu Chunhua, and now old Xi is eagerly seeking out little Hu himself? Did he forget to take his meds and go crazy? Even more intriguing is that right at this juncture, Xi Jinping suddenly warned in the Qiushi magazine that someone within the party is preparing to jump ship, demanding that two-faced people must not be allowed to muddle through during the leadership transition. Wait, let me timidly ask: if old Xi really secretly summoned little Hu, isn't he the biggest two-faced person himself? Exactly. Recently, overseas independent media broke the news that during Xi Jinping's recent attendance at a health and wellness meeting in Beijing, he deliberately arranged for Cai Qi to privately contact Hu Chunhua. During their conversation, Hu Chunhua's performance was airtight: he neither complained about his own political misfortunes nor criticized current policies; instead, from the international anti-corruption situation to grassroots governance, he gave high praise to Xi Jinping's governance. Hmm, what kind of hypocritical actors are these? Wait, why do I feel that if Cai Qi secretly met with little Hu and reported back to old Xi, little Hu's reported behavior might not be the whole truth? What do you mean? Who knows, maybe Cai Qi is trimming his sails, seeing that little Hu has a chance to make a comeback like Hu Hansian, and is already offering a pledge of allegiance. This guy is born for officialdom, get out of here. Anyway, previously circulating overseas claims have been noticed once again: CCP retired elders are re-participating in high-level power coordination, former premier Wen Jiabao is playing an important role in presiding over decision-making and consultative coordination bodies, and Hu Chunhua, the cross-generation successor of the Hu Jintao era, appears on the seven-member emergency group list and is secretly contacted by Cai Qi. Is Xi proactively considering little Hu's political comeback, or are other forces within the party proposing different personnel plans? He just has to go through the motions, it's all very murky. Time for an emergency poll: Do you predict that major political news regarding Xi Jinping will break out at the CCP Fifth Plenary Session? Here are the options: 1. Yes, 2. No, 3. Anything is possible. Hurry up and type your number in the comment section.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has completely stopped pretending when it comes to the pension issue. What are they trying to do? On October 16, the director of the Shandong Provincial Department of Civil Affairs dropped the bottom card with a single sentence: individuals are the primary responsible party for their own retirement. Old oxen and old horses can run around telling each other the news, so please allow me a moment to quietly digest this. You go ahead and digest it first, because on the 16th itself, during a press conference of the Shandong Provincial Government, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs declared with a stern face that they want to guide the entire society to establish the concept that individuals are the primary responsible party for their retirement, play the role of loving families, and incorporate individual pension education and retirement planning guidance into national conditions education on aging and education and training for the elderly, guiding groups like those born in the 1970s and 1980s to plan their retirement lives in advance. This means the Party is completely abandoning old men and old women, right? Anyway, the comment section completely exploded, and middle-aged and elderly people collectively expressed their stance: no matter how much we cannot remember recent events, we remember events from decades ago very clearly. What does this bring to mind? The Party's solemn promise from 40 years ago is still deeply ingrained in our brains, hearts, and souls to this day: "Only have one child, and the government will provide for your old age." A community secretary remarked, "Don't—don't you remember the second half of that sentence? Family planning is good, and the government helps provide for your old age." People felt a bit of a vague impression, which made things easier. Then, the Party subsequently kept pace with the times to say that retirement cannot rely on the government, postponing retirement so you can rely on yourselves for retirement. Do you remember this matter particularly clearly? Completely no impression. Ah, all of us elderly people are like this; the closer an event is to the present, the less we can remember it. Oh, where is the Memory Eraser from the Ministry of Magic in Harry Potter? Hurry up and use correction fluid to completely cover up what those old Muggles remember in their brains—"Only have one child, and the government will provide for your old age." They have been driven completely out of their minds with anxiety. The Chinese Communist bandits are ultimate liars who have scammed Chinese people out of their pensions countless times. Everyone says that the domestic trend nowadays is actually—if you savor it carefully—the Chinese Communist bandits are the true ancestors of scamming the elderly, having scammed the pension promise from "the government will provide for your old age" down to "rely on yourself for your old age." And there is even an upgraded version: pushing the obligation of supporting the elderly onto the government is shameful, so they recommend that good old men and old women team up to live collective lives. The concept sounds wonderful: "responding to population aging to build a happy old age together." Get lost! Only without your Party will we have a happy old age. It is all caused by your Party's family planning, and the harm is not just ordinary. Tea lovers must have heard about old men and old women in some rural areas of Shandong teaming up to live together and provide for each other's retirement, right? Some children don't care, and some simply don't have children at all. Many of those without children were harmed by the Chinese Communist bandits' family planning, harmed miserably. Several counties in Shandong were places where, in 1991, local Party officials launched the devastating "100-Day No Children Campaign" in order to closely follow the trend. No children were allowed to be born within 100 days, and slogans were even hung up: "Even if it means breaking the family line, we must let the Party feel at ease"; "Even if it has to be aborted, it is not allowed to be born"; "Hang yourselves with a rope, drink poison from a bottle." The whole thing was a 100-day mass massacre. The year 1991 was the Year of the Goat in the Chinese lunar calendar, and locals called the 100-Day No Children Campaign "slaughtering lamb lambs." People remember this matter. The overall commander of the campaign at the time was the then-Party Secretary of Guanxian County and the Party Secretary of Shenxian County. Local people in Shenxian even made up folk rhymes: "Bai Zhigang slaughters lambs, newlywed first births all face the knife; elders and folks of Shenxian curse him to dig up his ancestral graves, and the hatred is hard to eliminate. Such monstrous sins are unforgivable to heaven, enduring five thundering strikes and a thousand cuts. One day when heaven opens its eyes, the Bai family line will be cut off at the roots." The common people hated the Communist Party's running dog officials to the core, yet they loved their Party mother endlessly. Zeng Zhaoqi was promoted smoothly after the 100-Day No Children Campaign, eventually reaching the official position of Director of the Shandong Provincial State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission. This was a path to official promotion paved by the wronged souls of tens of thousands of lambs, and the people of Shandong could never imagine how much the Communist Party despises the common people. After Zeng Zhaoqi stepped down as Director of the Shandong Provincial State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the Party intentionally arranged a position for him: Deputy Director of the Office of the Shandong Provincial Working Committee for the Care of the Next Generation. Oh my god, letting a butcher who slaughtered children care for the next generation of Shandong people? Isn't this pouring salt directly into their wounds? After caring tens of thousands of the next generation out of existence, they now come to care for the living. The statement that the CCP is a devil is definitely not an empty phrase. Finally, all the men and women of childbearing age in Shandong have grown old, and Shandong suddenly hoisted the giant banner to shout out for Party mother that individuals are the primary responsible party for their retirement. The ancestral grave of the Director of the Shandong Provincial Department of Civil Affairs has been kicked open by his ancestors, and he jumps out to lecture these unfilial turtle grandchildren. The turtle-grandson Civil Affairs Department director declared: "35 years ago, my Party could unhesitatingly slaughter the children who could have provided for your retirement; 35 years later, my Party can still righteously tell you to stay far away from the government, as retirement is your own business and has nothing to do with the government's damn business." They are pressing the dignity of the Shandong people onto the ground to grind it back and forth, with the central and local authorities joining forces to grind it.
Just as the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security threatened the public with big data to track down individuals for social security payments, Shandong declared that the individual is the primary person responsible for their own retirement. The coordination speed is so fast that even the professional CCP mouthpiece Hu Xijin couldn't keep up; even old Hu found this plate too prickly to pick up. This bureau-level official, who receives a monthly pension of 33,000 yuan, expressed concern that the Party might provoke public anger, stating that such local propaganda is inappropriate or at least ineffective. He is concerned about the propaganda effect, arguing that the statement 'the individual is the primary person responsible for their own retirement' is taken out of context, as it couldn't have been said in a vacuum. He claims that overemphasizing this phrase makes it seem like local governments are shirking their responsibilities, when they supposedly aren't. Hu is so skilled at glossing over things, muddying the waters, and playing both sides—I know him too well. Finally, Hu suggested that local authorities should emphasize the work they are doing for resident pensions, including the bottom-line guarantee work, as this provides a sense of warmth and security. Even when it's cold, they have to talk up some warmth. In the end, he poured his heart out to maintain consistency with the official line, reassuring everyone that Chinese citizens wouldn't truly rely on the official organization for everything regarding retirement, as everyone knows they have to rely on themselves. After all that spinning, he bit his own tongue. Sigh, if you want to retire, you'd better count on yourself. That's why netizens say the Party-mother, which serves the people wholeheartedly, has once again pointed out the direction for the people's retirement wholeheartedly. Don't think that just because you've paid some social security, the state will take on your retirement burden—I'm choking on that. If you've seen the big news that just broke, you'll be choking even more: the sky of social security has suddenly collapsed, it really has. Rumor has it that the corruption involves trillions of yuan. This number alone is enough to faint or scare to death countless people who pay their social security on time, because everyone living in that place understands a heartbreaking fact: besides the embezzlement and misappropriation, it's questionable whether what's left is enough to pay the full pensions of current officials, civil servants, and public institution staff. So, tell me, isn't 'the individual is the primary person responsible for their own retirement' a heartfelt, honest truth? Sigh, my middle-aged and elderly friends inside the Great Firewall, be prepared and careful about your retirement. Didn't we say a couple of days ago that many banks in the CCP's China are scrambling to launch loan services for social security payments, euphemistically claiming to solve the problem of interrupted payments for flexible workers? It's another bottomless pit trap. It's obvious that the mortgage sector is declining and can't be squeezed for much more, so they've started targeting the elderly. Loans for social security payments are absolutely ruthless: no collateral or guarantee needed, with a maximum credit line of 200,000 yuan. From application to disbursement, it takes as fast as 30 minutes, and the money is transferred directly into the social security account after disbursement. Just ask yourself, once the money arrives, aren't you panicked? The cattle and horses (the people) are tricked by the Party into signing a paper, and then they start paying back the principal and interest to the Party-state's banks, pulling the cart until they die. They will eat you dry, empty your pockets, and leave you with nothing, so you can come and go without any attachments. The good days are still ahead.
Just as the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the Party-State vowed to use big data to track down social marginals in every nook and cranny to enjoy the glory of paying social security—the glory of stripping everything bare—and just as the coders in Chinese-Communist-land are putting aside their pride to rush to the streets to set up stalls and tinker with the bustling earthly atmosphere because they are being replaced by AI, with post-doctoral fellows finding flexible employment, the tech giants on the other side of the Pacific in the Beautiful Country have already begun racing to hand out money to Americans. Little Pinks instantly widen their eyes: what did you say? The vicious, ambitious wolves of capitalism in the United States are going downhill while racing to hand out money to ordinary people—all green money. On October 18, the US AI company Anthropic announced plans to put 5% of the company's shares into a newly established Anthropic Public Benefit Foundation. A public benefit foundation! Anthropic's Wall Street valuation is 2 trillion US dollars, and 5% is 100 billion US dollars, using this much money for public good. By the way, the regulation of US public benefit foundations is super strict; a listed company of this scale and magnitude talking about public benefit must actually use it for the public good. Speaking of public good, the Red Cross Society of the Party-State asks: where are the leaves? Quickly cover up Guo Meimei's Maserati, the 10,000-yuan tents in Wenchuan, the 20 top-spec Range Rovers in the Tibet disaster area, and the 8 million yuan warehouse of the Wenzhou Red Cross. Hey, fine, forget it, you can't cover it all up, there's too much. Anthropic stated that if the company's future valuation exceeds the set baseline by 50%, the board of directors can decide to allocate another 2% of shares for public benefit. What a massive stroke! The higher the company's value, the higher the proportion of shares invested in public benefit; the more it earns, the greater the public benefit investment. Right, this portion of shares will be under the regulation of the US Securities and Exchange Commission and will not be used for executive compensation and rewards, running right into a genuine public benefit foundation. In addition, Anthropic's co-founders had already promised at the company's inception to donate 80% of the equity they hold, and the company also implemented an employee equity donation matching plan with about half of the employees participating. With so many people participating, it's truly remarkable. Coupled with the public benefit foundation announced this time, about 20% of the shares will be exclusively used for the public interest. Coming and going, taking this much money for public benefit, the philanthropic heart is simply too strong. Furthermore, the public benefit foundation may be used in the future to make large donations to traditional non-profit organizations or directly distribute resources to specific groups of poor people, and so on, as well as to cope with the impact of AI on the labor market. This last point is too humane! If programmers in the Chinese Communist Party-State are replaced by AI, I'm sorry, tech companies simply don't have the leisure and money to take care of you. Delivering food, driving ride-hailing cars, or setting up stalls on the roadside—there is always a type of flexible employment suitable for you. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security immediately follows up: flexible employment is glorious, paying social security is even more glorious, and if you are unemployed and have no money to pay, it doesn't matter, our Party's bank has social security loans! If you don't want to borrow, sorry, tech companies' big data has laid out an inescapable net like eagles catching little chicks, fleecing you is without discussion. Why is it so tragic to be born in the East?
Speaking of handing out money to Americans, Musk, who just released a flying electric car, unleashed a major move. What major move? On October 18, Musk posted on the social media platform X suggesting that Anthropic should directly distribute shares to the public, and then said that this is what I am going to do. What is Musk going to do? On October 19, Musk officially announced that next year he will give a share of SpaceX stock to every American child and stated that this is just the first batch and there will be more. Wow, this is too generous! He explained on the platform X that next year I will distribute the SpaceX shares I hold to every child in America, and this will be the first of many donations. According to data from the US Census Bureau, there are about 73 million people under the age of 18 in the United States. Calculated at SpaceX's current stock price, Musk's donation is worth about 10.7 billion US dollars. 10 billion US dollars, and this is just the first batch! The famous quote rings in my ears: trams are Teslas. Of course, it remains unclear how these shares will be distributed to these tens of millions of American children, but I believe that with Musk's brain, he will surely figure out an efficient and fair plan to let SpaceX's shares fly for a while longer. Of course, it's not just private companies in the American empire making big moves to give back to society; their government also hands out money. Trump just announced that he is going to hand out money to American elderly people, so that goes without saying. Back during the epidemic, as long as you had even a single tax filing record in New York State before the epidemic occurred proving that you were a low-income person, regardless of whether you had US status or not, you were given a cash subsidy of 15,600 US dollars down to the exact dollar. The application form was submitted, and the cash subsidy arrived in a month. Moreover, if you didn't know English and couldn't fill out the application form, it didn't matter; the government paid to hire bilingual social workers to help you apply. Just compare that and let it break your heart. In short, after a wave of epidemic, whether the East is rising and the West is declining or the West is rising and the East is declining has become completely indistinguishable. What does it mean? Compared to the [Eastern Campaign]
Specifically speaking
[110,000 RMB per person, chased and delivered to your doorstep]
The party says "misfortune makes a nation prosperous," do you understand? I don't know if the nation became prosperous, but I do know that this nationwide steel lock business definitely prospered the wallets of many party officials. Oh dear, look at this for me. This July, the U.S. government launched a tax-deferred investment plan for minors called the Trump Account. Do you know about it? The initial funding is a one-time deposit of $1,000 made by the federal Treasury for eligible newborns—yes, $1,000 for those born after 2025, and $250 for those born before. My family's arrived last month, and their son has money and is secretly laughing already. In addition, parents, employers, local governments, or charities can contribute up to an extra $5,000 per child each year. These funds are mandatorily invested in low-cost index funds tracking the U.S. stock market, such as the S&P 500, which has a historical annualized return of over 10%. To date, the number of Trump Accounts has grown to 70 million, meaning 70 million American children have joined this plan, investing real money into America's future, because children are truly a country's future.
Mother Party expresses its refusal to accept this. First comes the party, then the country; first comes the country, then the home. Sacrificing the small family for the country is only natural, right? Besides, Americans are profit above everything and only know money. How selfless our country's educational direction is! All children and teenagers are cultivated to willingly sacrifice their small selves or even all their spare parts for someone else's 150-year grand goal. Touching China! Hey, where is the God of Thunder? There is a harvesting-crime syndicate here, please strike them with lightning.
Alright.
The results of the previous poll have been posted on the community bulletin board.
Welcome to check it out.
New tea friends, don't forget to click subscribe and the little bell.
Tea friends are also welcome to join the Old Beijing Teahouse member channel.
Click on the Ginex American ginseng black ointment recommended by the brothers.
There are links in the text column below the title and in the pinned comment.
Let's go!
Multiple styles launched with passion every week.
Spicy News Skewers, see you there or be square.
See you in the member zone.