[Lude Press] 9/22/2026 [ludepress.com]

This episode of the Lude Media program focuses on an analysis of President Trump's stern speech at the UN General Assembly, the trilateral game between the U.S., North Korea, and South Korea, the progress of the Greenland security agreement, and the situation involving China, Iran, and Russia. The program points out that Trump repeatedly emphasized confronting the common enemy of all mankind in his speech, demonstrating a tough stance. It also discusses South Korea's situation in the context of the U.S.-South Korea trade agreement, the latest developments on the Korean Peninsula, and hot topics such as the Iranian Foreign Minister seeking protection from the U.S. Diplomatic Security Service.

Video link:

Full text:

Alright, hello everyone, welcome to today's Lude Media and Dr. Yan program on September 22, 2026. Tomorrow, the highly anticipated Trump-Xi meeting will take place at Andrews Air Force Base; this is essentially the initial meeting. Trump is going to welcome Xi, and it will continue until September 25th. We can foresee that we will have more and more content to share with you, and everyone is waiting to see it. In other words, this state visit by Xi feels like coming to receive the Sword of Damocles; it might just be the last time. It's not even a "might," it is highly likely that this is the last state visit to the United States, and there is plenty to watch. At the same time, the warm-up has already begun, and with the UN General Assembly currently being held in New York, Trump also attended and gave a speech. So, there is a lot to share with you today, and we will speed up to see if we can cover as much of this content as possible before the program ends.

First, let me show you a video. This was released online, showing a fully armed counter-terrorism team from the U.S. Coast Guard filmed patrolling the waters of New York. Because President Trump is going to transfer from Air Force One to the Marine One helicopter to fly to Manhattan to attend the UN General Assembly, this counter-terrorism team is already present. Look, there are so many of them, it's very cool, right? And then, it's particularly funny, the U.S. Ambassador to the UN, McWhorter, specifically posted a tweet of him and his wife walking into the UN headquarters in New York together. The caption he added is very funny, just one sentence, take a look. This is reacting so slowly, why is it not displaying? Can we open his tweet? I don't know why it's not showing, it's just spinning, it seems a bit strong... here it is. Look, after walking in, he added a sentence, saying the elevator is now "working." This is actually completely mocking the fact that when Trump went to the UN General Assembly last year, someone tampered with it, almost putting Trump and the First Lady in danger on the elevator. Look, McWhorter went and felt it, saying it works this time, which shows that although we haven't seen it, the interior of the UN must have been thoroughly cleaned up over the past year; at least they don't dare to cause trouble now.

Also, before we started the show today, a piece of news came out. There aren't many specific details yet, but a video was released showing the streets near the UN headquarters in chaos. What happened? It is said that a suspicious, unidentified package was found on the street near the UN headquarters. The NYPD bomb squad has already arrived to check whether there are explosives placed nearby and if there is a possibility of a terrorist attack. Of course, by the time this happened, Trump had already left the UN headquarters safely under the escort of his motorcade. You see, this time when Trump came, there were none of those issues—no elevators breaking down, no microphones malfunctioning, no teleprompters failing; none of those problems at all. And there was none of that incident from last year where someone claimed to be mentally ill, followed Trump's delegation inside, and even ran into the women's restroom to intimidate and attack female officials accompanying the delegation. When that happened, the UN just said, 'It's not our business,' claiming a mentally ill person had just slipped in during security checks. I told everyone back then, how could there be so many coincidences with mental illness, elevators, and equipment failures? They were just looking for excuses. I suspect the UN was tight on budget at the time, and those involved were likely investigated under various pretexts and fired, right?

Speaking of this, it is quite interesting. Since everyone is appearing at the UN, reporters are very busy today. Guancha.cn doesn't care about anything else; they only focus on this. Look, they reported that Venezuelan acting president Rodriguez arrived in New York. And since the place where Maduro is being held is now only a little over ten kilometers away from the headquarters—well, we know ten kilometers is very close, just like the 15 kilometers or so between the Kremlin in Moscow and that diesel plant that was just bombed—so the reporters were very focused on this. Look at the photos Rodriguez posted himself upon arriving in New York; he was very happy, giving speeches and such, saying he arrived in New York with the people's faith in the encounter and unity between nations, carrying firmness and hope. But reporters love to stir the pot, so they specifically ran over to ask Rodriguez, 'Hey, now that you're here, so close to the MDC, are you going to go see Maduro?' Rodriguez didn't respond at all; he remained silent and got straight into his car. You have to say, the fact that the CCP made a big fuss about this and had Guancha.cn break the news—doesn't it feel like the CCP has a sort of 'telepathic' connection here? You say the Venezuelan acting president went over, and reporters were specifically trying to stir up trouble, but what kind of excitement is the CCP watching here? We don't know. The CCP is currently in a state where, first, because it's been crashing into everything everywhere, its brain wasn't working well to begin with, and then it got even more rattled. So now, it's both muddled and dizzy, to the point where it actually thinks this news might somehow reflect... I don't know what they are thinking. I feel like they want to show that the Venezuelan acting president seemed unprepared for the American reporters to ask such questions, or perhaps they think, 'Look, the new and old Venezuelan leaders are in the same city at the same time, one at the MDC and one at the UN General Assembly—wow, what a bizarre scene.' But you have to know, we say the CCP is watching the Venezuelan drama, completely forgetting that the person inside the MDC is Xi's good brother. You say you're watching this drama, but you don't think about the fact that Xi doesn't even dare to go to New York? He was invited to the UN General Assembly, yet he didn't dare to go. I've figured it out now: Xi is absolutely terrified that if he goes to the UN General Assembly, the moment he arrives in New York, a reporter might jump out and ask, 'Hey, your good brothers Maduro and Guo Wengui are not far from here; do you want to go see them? What are your thoughts on Maduro not being able to talk to you in real-time from prison?' Because it seems Maduro only has 300 minutes of talk time per month now, and with such precious time needing to be spent with lawyers and family, I estimate he doesn't have much time to call Xi on that Huawei or Xiaomi phone. And although Guo Wengui is in prison now, he isn't so far away that it feels like a world apart. You say, if reporters go and ask, 'Your fake anti-communist Guo Wengui is here, he failed to do your bidding and is so close to you; do you want to go see him?' So you see, why does Xi not let a single reporter get close? Not one can be allowed to ask questions on-site. If these reporters were to ask questions, who knows which one might hit the fatal weak spot? That is why Guancha.cn published this article with such complicated feelings.

There is also a very interesting thing: Lee Jae-myung from South Korea went to the UN General Assembly, and the New York Times published a special interview with him just today. Oh, as soon as I looked at the content of this interview, I realized that Lee Jae-myung is now thoroughly being treated as this year's Petro. Last year, it was that Colombian President Petro who stood at the crossroads and acted like a traffic director, telling American soldiers not to listen to Trump, and immediately had his visa revoked and was kicked right out, and subsequently stepped down this year anyway. Moreover, the US gave him plenty of warnings along the way, telling him, "Kid, you better be sensible, otherwise, didn't Petro almost have to go help out when Maduro was captured, but later didn't it all just turn out like nothing ever happened?" Just as Petro was being suppressed over there, look at Lee Jae-myung over here getting a special feature in the New York Times—at a glance, this is clearly meant to give him a boost. Speaking of interviews with the New York Times, we have experienced that ourselves, except that we stand right on the exact opposite side of the CCP, so the CCP in there was practically dying to strangle us. Therefore, you can tell whose side Lee Jae-myung is standing on just by looking at this. Furthermore, living up to the expectations of the Xi-led CCP, Lee Jae-myung started off by describing the effectiveness of US sanctions as already weak. That implies your US sanctions against North Korea are useless, and instead of that, you might as well listen to Lee Jae-myung and urge the US to relax sanctions on North Korea, and then let North Korea sit down for talks, telling you to properly stop developing nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles. And then he even says that given the current US approach, denuclearization under the current situation will achieve nothing, but first building mutual trust and eventually persuading North Korea to cut back its nuclear weapons is the politically correct rhetoric—sounding oh-so-nice. The problem is, does Trump need you, Lee Jae-myung, to spout off in the New York Times? Isn't this just hilarious? In fact, the underlying reality of all this has been exposed: if Trump were to actually take the New York Times seriously as a reference, it means the more the New York Times hypes something up, the more the US must investigate it, and the more the New York Times scolds someone—scolding Trump and scolding us—the more the US has to carefully ponder what on earth you guys did to piss off the Xi-led CCP to this extent. So looking at this, Lee Jae-myung has already been pushed out there, but the thing is, Lee Jae-myung making all this noise completely doesn't affect the US. The US hasn't even said it would listen to your opinions; didn't the US long ago pour cold water directly on South Korea, or on the CCP currently trying to wedge a foot in to once again play some role and generate some heat during the US-North Korea agreements or meetings? In the middle of this process, let alone whether the US pays any attention to Lee Jae-myung, just look at Fatty Kim; Kim Jong-un doesn't humor you in the slightest. Look at this over here: the day before yesterday, it was reported that on September 20, North Korea suddenly launched an unidentified flying object toward the Sea of Japan, and the military was analyzing whether it was a ballistic missile. That means South Korea's joint chiefs of staff hadn't figured out what was launched before it landed in the East Sea, while Japan said, "Well, since it was launched, it was launched, and anyway it didn't land within my exclusive economic zone," giving the feeling that this matter isn't all that big of a deal. Then today, news has already come out saying that whatever none of you saw clearly—for instance, flying out and landing somewhere, which people pay attention to, but then don't pay so much attention to because it didn't hit you directly—this thing was actually North Korea announcing the successful testing of a new important combat weapon system, and they even released a photo of Fatty Kim and his daughter together, looking very successful. Regardless of whether it's actually successful or not, Fatty Kim's attitude right now is basically: as long as I throw a double-bang firecracker out from home, and then as long as I smile into the camera and flash a 'V' for victory, then I've succeeded. Now it's not just me flashing a 'V', my daughter and my sister are doing it too. This at least lets you see what Lee Jae-myung is shouting over there—oh, let's sit down and have a proper talk. The more you shout, the more North Korea pops out to talk your head off. Your Chinese Communist State tells me to talk, South Korea tells me to talk, and you guys want to tie me to your pirate ship; do you think I, Fatty Kim, can't see through that? So Fatty Kim now has this kind of deep-seated national and family hatred—after all, his daughter's trauma is still held in the grip of the Xi-led CCP—this kind of posture of enduring humiliation in a humble body yet plotting revenge. The more you shout over there as if North Korea will obediently sit down and listen and talk, the more I won't give you face, and the more I want to show you that you cannot control me, unless the US comes directly to communicate with me. At the same time, you can imagine that Fatty Kim is definitely stepping up paving the road of mutual trust either by talking directly to the US or through Russia; this is his last chance. When you see this chaotic tossing and turning, and then look at Lee Jae-myung running all the way to the New York Times to make all sorts of clamor, you will know that in this political struggle between North Korea, South Korea, and the CCP, North Korea is currently holding the upper hand, at least for now. The US is reaping the profits of a third party, and this Lee Jae-myung has really become more and more annoying to the US recently.

Look at that, didn't someone mention a few days ago about whether to send troops to the Strait of Hormuz for peacekeeping, for maintaining shipping? At that time, the US said the South Korean military should send troops, which scared the Lee Jae-myung government so much that they bolted upright in their sleep and hurriedly ran out to shout, "No, no, we are still discussing it." Then later, around September 18, Lee Jae-myung specifically came out to settle the matter once and for all, saying that South Korea would not participate in Iran's war in any form, that this matter is decided by them and will not change, and that we will continue to adhere to the principle of non-intervention in wars. The implication was: I am hardly going to stand together with you Americans. Didn't the US just probe you with that? To put it bluntly, what has Iran become now? Does it even need your meager South Korean forces over there? Lee Jae-myung ruled this out, but behind the scenes, South Korean officials were actually somewhat scared, knowing that Lee Jae-myung had offended the US like this. They still came out to leak the message, saying, "Oh, but, it's not that South Korea wants to completely distance itself from the US on this matter; it's just that we are studying how to assist in our own way, under the premise of not intervening in combat and not participating directly." See that? This shows that South Korea is currently being pulled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in both directions—even if you get torn in half, it doesn't matter, as long as you act as cannon fodder for them, while at the same time continuously hoping that the US will show mercy.

Don't actually tear yourself apart, right? You can see from comparing these two simultaneous pieces of news that South Korea is currently in a very contradictory, terrified, and even panicked state, right? It's very obvious, isn't it? US Forces Korea is right there, and the US dominant position in South Korea doesn't even need to be spoken of. The moment they do speak, your fate under Lee Jae-myung, at any moment, could end up just like that former prime minister of Iraq, those pro-Iran and pro-CCP factions, right? Dragged straight out of their homes by troops in the middle of the night and rounded up in one net. And over in Iraq, although this anti-corruption drive seemed quite effective a short while ago, didn't the US exert pressure again these past couple of days, saying that if you don't continue to clean up your act, we will cut off your supply of US dollars, right? The last time it happened, they said they were suspending US dollars to Iraq, and immediately the new Iraq prime minister arrested that bunch of corrupt officials. Now it is very obvious that this belongs to a combat state of waxing and waning, right? It's very obvious that the CCP, the remnants of Iran's forces, and those previous corrupt networks still want to find an opportunity to make a comeback. But you see, the US is implementing it a second time in Iraq, using US dollars to start exerting pressure on you. Therefore, it can be anticipated that Iraq's new government will soon have another wave of powerful strikes to wipe out anti-US forces, whether they are Iranian, CCP, or others.

And then look over here, oh my goodness, the CCP's country is still boasting there, saying that Lee Jae-myung stated he would not deploy troops, and the CCP expressed a sense of relief. In reality, when Lee Jae-myung made this press conference, he actually revealed long ago that he was being squeezed and manipulated by both sides on this matter, feeling extremely miserable. For example, back in March, Lee Jae-myung said that the situation in Iran made him unable to sleep. Lee Jae-myung has really been quite miserable recently. In South Korea, although there are electoral frauds and whatnot going on, his approval ratings in South Korea have been dropping again and again. Take the Iran issue, for instance; he couldn't sleep in peace back in March, right? And now it's impossible for him to sleep any better, isn't it? Back in March, at least the US hadn't directly told them that South Korea had to participate in the war, right? And this matter of Lee Jae-myung not being able to sleep well is also very interesting. That is, look at what he says—no matter what he says, he can't sleep well. That means this person Lee Jae-myung possesses a bizarre kind of personal charm of a spineless politician. This charm is in quotation marks because he always gives people a particularly, exceptionally spineless feeling, yet he is forced to bite the bullet and step onto the front stage to carry out tasks. So you see, when talking about the Iran issue back then, he was already losing sleep and tossing and turning. Then recently, the US isn't just probing him on whether or not to send troops to the Strait of Hormuz; the US is now putting even greater pressure on him because he signed a trade agreement framework but failed to implement it concretely. Therefore, starting from last month in August, messages were actually already being leaked that the US had given a deadline, saying that you, Lee Jae-myung, signed this US-South Korea trade agreement to lower tariffs, but you aren't implementing it concretely, which has caused huge delays in progress. Moreover, you South Koreans keep making excuses, so they are very unhappy. In August, they said roughly that the last month is about up and you better figure it out, otherwise I'll directly raise tariffs on you, right? Lee Jae-myung is like an ant on a hot pan, so you see him once again saying he couldn't sleep through the night. I feel like this Lee Jae-myung is either going to end up as cannon fodder for the CCP, or he might completely wear himself out and break down first, feeling like he hasn't slept a single good night in the past half year.

And then, regarding you, Lee Jae-myung, why have you been dragging this out? You thought that the CCP would surely let you sign first, right? After signing, I would use you, South Korea, to steal technology, and use you to establish communication and infiltration channels from the US. Then, you could also change the origin of goods in this western production area, and I could even have your Lee Jae-myung administration exert pressure on the US. The CCP's plan was so well-calculated, but the US doesn't care. Once the framework agreement is signed, whatever you say about me getting money into your South Korea, or building things in the US, I, the US, don't recognize it. But you told me you would invest $350 billion here, and it would be fully managed by the US; you cannot interfere. Look at this, the US just bit down hard on him. So Lee Jae-myung is in a miserable state. He even said himself that since it's signed, he can't back out. He finally managed to get a reprieve like the CCP, delaying the tariffs for now, but the US asks him every day, 'When are you going to bring out that $350 billion?' Then he says, 'Look, I don't even know what projects to do, I don't know what investments to make, how can I give it? What is the return on investment, the capital recovery mechanism, the profit sharing? I want mutual benefit, but right now there's potential for loss. If I give out $350 billion and I can't manage it well, what then?' That's exactly it. The US didn't say it wanted you to manage it well; the US said, 'Aren't you playing this game with me? Take out your purse.' Now that the purse is in my hands, I won't let you disobey me. Actually, do you see it? The $350 billion investment in the US-South Korea trade agreement framework, is it not essentially a variation of the gold and oil agreements that Rodriguez signed? So Lee Jae-myung cannot implement this. And so, we say, if you don't implement it, the US sees it. Usually, you talk nicely, but when things happen, you start making excuses. Then you are not the ally we want. Do you see? So now, the CCP's unrestricted warfare, plus using these Huang Jiguang and Dong Cunrui types, their new way of fighting in the US, it doesn't work. The US doesn't listen to your empty moralizing; it only looks at whether you deliver on the ground. This is really interesting. It got the South Korean Foreign Minister and others to run to the US a couple of days ago to talk about this. And there, they met Rubio, right? The US didn't waste words with him. The US just said that the South Korean Foreign Minister came over and the talks went very well, and that they mainly discussed how to quickly and promptly implement the South Korea-US trade agreement. 'Don't drag your feet with me here.' And after the South Korean Foreign Minister ran back, well, although South Korea really doesn't want to pay, there's no way to delay it any further. Biting the bullet, look, today they announced the decision for a major investment in the US. Out of this $350 billion, at least $22.3 billion must be taken out first to build a gas power plant in Texas, specifically to generate electricity for the US AI power centers and computing centers. So you see, Lee Jae-myung is now running to the New York Times and spouting nonsense there, but what's the use? You haven't even won any face, and the US has already snatched the benefits away.

And look over there, on the eve of the Trump-Xi meeting, Rubio stood with the foreign ministers of Japan and South Korea and issued a joint statement. This South Korean Foreign Minister seems quite busy too. It seems like just last week he finished a meeting and went back, and it feels like he hasn't done anything else all week but fly. Anyway, the three foreign ministers stood together and issued a joint statement, once again emphasizing the importance of maintaining stability and peace in the Taiwan Strait. You say this foreign minister chosen by Lee Jae-myung, now on the Taiwan Strait issue, with Xi looking like he's about to come over, originally they were saying, 'Oh, don't let Trump sell arms to Taiwan,' using this as a bargaining chip, and only then would Xi be willing to come. As a result, look, Trump said he didn't intend to sell anything to Taiwan today anyway. You insisted on turning something that wasn't a bargaining chip into one, so sorry, we will meet force with force. Rubio didn't have to pay any cost; he just went to the UN and held hands with the Japanese and South Korean foreign ministers to issue a statement. Look, the CCP's attempt to take advantage of this issue has already hit a wall. So the presidential spokesperson for Lai Ching-te said, 'Oh, we very much welcome the three foreign ministers demonstrating a firm stance on the security and stability of the Taiwan Strait and the region through concrete actions.' I say, this Lee Jae-myung, shouldn't he think carefully? Is this foreign minister really standing on his side? I feel that this foreign minister, now that he has come to meet with the US, listens to the US on everything, right? Lee Jae-myung says, 'Your US actions are useless,' but the other side says, 'Why useless? Everything we do is useful, right? Don't worry about whether my sanctions on North Korea are useful; I signed that trade agreement with you, South Korea, and now you have to cough up over $20 billion.' And look at this Taiwan Strait issue, Lee Jae-myung is desperately trying to cooperate with the CCP, right? But your foreign minister is now standing with Rubio, issuing a joint statement. You don't even dare to say you won't sign this, or you won't attend this occasion. So, who is powerful, and who is just blowing hot air? Can you see it clearly now?

Trump also took time today to formally sign a milestone Greenland security agreement with the Prime Minister of Denmark and the Prime Minister of Greenland. The White House stated that this historic agreement is crucial to U.S. national security and defense in the Arctic region. While the specific details of the agreement have not yet been released, it is known that the U.S. plans to reopen a former Cold War-era military base in Greenland and utilize a site currently belonging to the Danish military to expand the U.S. military presence in Greenland. In other words, two large military bases are to be activated, aimed directly at China and Russia. Meanwhile, the leaders of Denmark and Greenland, who had previously been jumping up and down in opposition, have now obediently and smilingly signed the deal. Additionally, some online have summarized that, according to leaked information, this Greenland agreement is significantly different from similar agreements the U.S. signed in 1951 and 2004. According to sources, the differences are as follows: look at the duration of the agreement. The 1951 agreement stated it was valid as long as NATO existed, and the 2004 agreement said the same. However, this new agreement is effectively permanent, regardless of whether NATO continues to exist. Regarding the possibility of Greenland becoming independent, the 1951 and 2004 agreements did not specify what would happen, creating a variable; if Greenland were to become independent, it was unclear whether they could force the U.S. or NATO forces out, making security a major uncertainty. The new agreement closes this loophole; U.S. sources state it explicitly stipulates that even if Greenland were to become independent one day, the U.S. right to permanent military bases there remains valid. You see, they have thoroughly driven the nail in.

Furthermore, regarding the scale of military deployment, the 1951 agreement mentioned multiple defense zones with specific regulations, while the 2004 agreement actually reduced this to only the Thule base. Now, you see an expansion of military presence and the addition of facilities, making it active once again. Also, as a military base for a non-NATO country, this is important because the CCP is not a NATO country, nor is Russia. Previously, in 1951 and 2004, there was a huge loophole; it did not specify whether non-NATO countries could or could not establish military bases there, so the new agreement closes this: non-NATO countries are prohibited from establishing military bases. The CCP can forget about causing trouble there. Moreover, regarding critical minerals and sensitive investments, the 1951 and 2004 agreements didn't even consider this issue, but now they have. So, the U.S. has veto power; it has veto power over all critical mineral and sensitive investments in Greenland by non-NATO countries. Look at how powerful that is; China and Russia can't even get in with their money because the U.S. says no. Even if you bring it to my doorstep, it's useless. Additionally, regarding missile defense, which was not covered before, it is now very encouraging; the Greenland agreement explicitly stipulates full support for the missile defense system. Do you see that? Isn't this a huge success? You say the CCP spends so much manpower and resources, dragging people's feet, sowing discord, and spreading rumors. Now do you understand why they spent so much energy? This is truly, especially since you say Russia can't afford to worry so much about Greenland, right? It hasn't even digested its own vast territory, Siberia, and the Far East, and it can't afford to have such strong ambitions right now, right? After all, whether Putin's head stays on his neck depends on the U.S. attitude toward him. But the CCP has been plotting in Greenland these years with its Belt and Road and its 'East rising, West falling' rhetoric. Now look, the U.S. has seen through all those deep-seated ulterior motives and has wiped them all out at once.

Well, then we are going to talk about it. President Trump's speech at the UN General Assembly today—oh boy, it was amazing and very long. We can't read all of it to you, but there are definitely key points in it. Look, the highlight featured by groups like Noomi and others is that we will unswervingly and unitedly march forward, facing the common enemy of all mankind head-on. Oh, good grief, what a statement! Aren't we going to face General Secretary Xi head-on tomorrow? Really, if you look at his conversation and this speech, it seems like he didn't explicitly call the Chinese Communist Party the common enemy of all mankind. But if you only look at the surface, you completely missed the subtext, didn't you? Look, let us break it down for you, a dead-angle-free repair. Look, President Trump said, right off the bat, he brought up the US celebration of its 250th anniversary of freedom. Right from the start, as we celebrate the glorious 250th anniversary of freedom and independence, it is with great honor that I welcome you to America. Two and a half centuries after this continent became the home of the cause of freedom, welcome, world, to America. We—I can proudly report to you all—America is back. Our country is stronger than ever before, our economy is the envy of the world, our military strength is second to none globally, our technology is top-notch, and we are far ahead in almost every field. Hey, why is Trump so good with words? Ah, "far ahead." Tell me, hey, this phrase—Huawei, the pillar of a great power that used to shout "far ahead," is now on trial in New York! While Trump is giving this speech, over there in the Southern District, and the Eastern District Court is trying the Huawei case. Who on earth is really far ahead? Trump says we are far ahead, our energy nourishes the entire earth, America is rising, the country is growing, our strength is expanding, development is unprecedented, and our future is extremely bright. We're just saying, the Chinese Communist Party talks all day about how America has been around for 250 years, and it's time for it to fall and time for us to rise. What a joke! You think your 150 years for Xi is a small goal? America's 250 years, that's even more of a small goal, right? You're still over there waiting for the East to rise and the West to set, wanting to dictate to the world. Otherwise, why do I say that people without culture need to go to class? Look at Trump, wherever he goes—now for a year, starting since last year, he's been mentioning that next year is our 250th anniversary of freedom, and this year he mentions it on every occasion, to anyone he sees, right? Look, he even tells the United Nations about freedom and independence, America's glory, and America's history. So you see, shouldn't Xi be taken to the National Archives first to see what the Declaration of Independence, the Declaration of Rights, and the US Constitution are—just these few things? You're still over there talking down about America, do you even know how these things should be understood? Of course, Trump doesn't guarantee you'll master it, right? For a guy where 3.5 plus 3.5 equals 6.5, you can only do your utmost to give him a lesson. If you had to guarantee everyone master it—if you had to guarantee the pig brains of the whole world would master it—then why are we seeing police dogs instead of police pigs right now, huh?

Then Trump listed a series of numbers about taking office and so on, which we won't go into too much, right? Including the U.S. stock market hitting new highs 80 times in the past 12 months, and then saying illegal immigration is down to zero—they can't get in, right? Crime rates are dropping, the tourism industry is improving. It's nothing like what Canada says, like 'Oh, the U.S. is imposing tariffs on me, so I'll boycott your tourism industry and we Canadians won't go.' Oh, please don't take yourself too seriously, right? Come to think of it, looking at the Chinese Communist Party's country right now, praising that Carney is just like flattering Peng Dehuai. But truth be told, Carney is somewhat lacking in stature; in U.S. news, he at best gets a moment when he goes head-to-head with Trump or Bessent, where there might be a tiny chance of making the news and Americans mentioning him once. But as soon as this big event passes and he goes on doing this and that, talking about this and that, Americans really don't care about Carney. Speaking of which, I look at those dog-head scumbags like Huang Hebian and Xinuo, right? Anyway, since Guo Wengui is locked up now, they don't need to go after Guo Wengui every day during this period, because Guo is already serving time in prison. They were coordinating with Guo from both sides anyway, right? It was equivalent to them and Guo executing a mission together. In essence, they couldn't coordinate well enough to fool the U.S., and Guo's side was thoroughly exposed by us, right? So overall, they are just a failure. Therefore, these failed guys—not just these few days, but for over a year now since Trump took office and started shaking things up—have been fiercely cursing Trump. We see all these people in the world flying the banner of anti-communism, yet claiming that no matter how bad communism is, it's still not as bad as Trump's America. And then, especially with Huang Hebian treating Canada as his base, his flattery of Carney's government is just absurd. Everything Carney does is amazing, while the Trump government is too dark or something. But it hasn't made any real splash; if I didn't bring it up, you audience members would probably have cast these two rats from the sewer to the back of your minds. So you can see that the Chinese Communist Party's cognitive warfare and propaganda warfare are truly pathetic. The dead duck is stubborn, right? But if that dead duck starts rotting, before anyone even notices your stubborn mouth, the stench will drive people away. Right now, people like Huang Hebian and Xinuo—these imported goods—they are just stubborn dead ducks that are rotting, right? So they smell utterly disgusting. You see, Trump said, 'Look at how great we are, right? In this term, our investment in the U.S. military will reach $1.5 trillion. Who can keep up with that?' At the same time, Trump also said, 'We don't just take various improvement measures and policies for our own country; I know all of you sitting here very well. Everyone is very clear that to create a better, safer, and more prosperous world for our descendants and the people on Earth within a limited time, we must seize the opportunity. As the president of the most extraordinary nation in history, I have zero interest in leaving dangers behind to turn into disasters in the future.' Did you see that sentence? Think about this sentence: 'leaving dangers behind to turn into disasters in the future.' What do our audience members worry about the most? Isn't it that Trump's term might not be long enough, or execution might not be effective enough, or he might get bogged down by all sorts of things with his hands and feet tied, or get hoodwinked and fooled, thereby letting the Xi-CCP and this Chinese Communist Party regime continue to develop unchecked? If Trump fails to resolve this during his term, isn't that a huge disaster? Right, that would be a huge disaster! So Trump said, 'I have no interest in leaving these dangers behind to turn into disasters in the future.' Think about it. Some audience members are also worried that the virus origins won't be traced properly, and won't be traced back to the CCP's unrestricted bioweapons intentionally releasing the virus. But the virus was the trump card in Trump's previous term! It directly changed Trump's situation regarding the CCP back then—whether it was the trade war, the soybean agreement, or Trump's re-election bid, all of it was ruined after they released the virus. And to this day, holding people accountable within the U.S. hasn't even finished yet. Everyone is extremely worried, going 'Oh shit! If this matter of biological warfare and virus origin-tracing cannot be settled by Trump and is left for later, complications will arise, and the CCP will survive. Then if they release the virus every few days, who can possibly take it?' Right, Trump also knows: 'I do not advocate letting problems worsen, because that only makes them harder to solve. We cannot leave them behind to become future disasters.' See? He said: 'Therefore, while others engage in empty talk, I take concrete action; while others merely talk about peace, I forge peace. You guys engage in empty rhetoric while I do the real work; while others ignore threats, I confront them head-on; while others boast about courage, America demonstrates courage; while others promise strength, I wield strength to make America the most powerful country in the world.' Wow, that was brilliantly said! This series of parallel sentences—this, let me tell you, Rand Paul posted: 'Please mark your calendars. Anthony Fauci may have invoked the fifth amendment and chosen to remain silent, but the investigation continues. Tomorrow morning at 10:00 AM, the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will vote to decide whether to grant immunity to his long-time former assistant at the NIAID. If two-thirds of the committee vote in favor, we will be able to obtain the former assistant's testimony and the answers the American people deserve.' Ah, this former assistant—because David Morris has already pleaded guilty, he cannot have immunity. So remember when Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times back then? Ron Johnson and Rand Paul both said that Fauci's other assistants would be their breakthrough point. So now media analysis suggests that another core target might be...

The target director and special assistant at NIAID is named Greg Folkers. This is indeed true, and I tell you, it is worth paying attention to. You say Xi is landing at Andrews Air Force Base on September 23rd. Not only will there be no United Front people jumping around with banners or local children, but there won't be the five-star red flags that Newsom hung all over the streets last time he went to San Francisco, right? On the contrary, while he is still on the plane, the complete severance of Iran's aviation industry has already been implemented here, and over there, there is going to be a vote on Fauci, the former core target, regarding whether he should also be brought to the forefront. This is truly lively. So you can see that the United States is now going all out, in bounty hunter mode. Regardless of Rand Paul, Ron Johnson, or other representatives, etc., the accountability for the virus is now also in bounty hunter mode. Whoever can dig to the bottom of it will be the one who finally collects the bounty. Fame, including historical status, etc., will all be inseparable from them.

Then looking at Trump, he continued to talk about Iran, saying that challenges that had been difficult to overcome for decades and long-standing unresolved cases are now progressing smoothly. As a prime example—he didn't say it was the only one—he said the most typical one currently is Iran, the number one state sponsor of terrorism, which can no longer bully others. He said they are spreading death, slaughter, and chaos throughout the Middle East and the wider region. You see, that language is blunt enough. Behind this, it is defined by Congress that Xi Jinping is the number one supporter of Iran. So, you could say that all this spreading of death, slaughter, and chaos is exactly what you, Xi Jinping, are supporting. And yet, you still have to come here tomorrow. Isn't this a warm-up before a trial? Then Trump said that Iran must not possess nuclear weapons; his stance has never wavered, right? He said that all those who rejected this in Iran have made an extremely grave mistake. So, did that 'Midnight Hammer' turn Fordow into ruins? After that, he said—look, we won't read the middle part because the prose is excellent, but our time is limited—Trump's meaning is that anyone who stops the U.S. military from making Iran denuclearize is facing an attempt at destruction and will be leading themselves to their own doom. Then Trump said again, look, the cause of this, the 9/11 attacks, took 3,000 lives, and it has been 25 years now. And in two weeks, it will be the third anniversary of the October 7th attack on Israel, right? Including infants being slaughtered, and the Supreme Leader of Iran even celebrated it, calling it a contribution to humanity. He also said the Iranian regime slaughtered over 72,000 of its own citizens this year, and recently another 10,000 were killed in protests. He asked, what would happen if such a brutal regime had nuclear weapons and launched large-scale terrorist attacks, right? He said too many people ignore reality, everyone is playing dumb, and multiple presidents have been unwilling to take action. Now we must face reality. Everyone thinks about the cheering behind this, the driving force behind this—nuclear proliferation ultimately cannot be separated from the strong support of the CCP. So, these words, while talking about Iran and terrorists, which one isn't striking at Xi's heart? Well, he said after giving Iran every opportunity to reach an agreement, I took action to ensure that no country of ours would face a devastating nightmare, right? So, the 'Epic Fury' reduced Iran's air force, radar, navy, air defense, and the ability to produce missiles and drones to zero, and inflation skyrocketed. And now, even with the ceasefire and nuclear negotiations, Iran is still blatantly launching terrorist attacks on merchant ships of other countries, violating the ceasefire agreement. Trump said I want to thank the Security Council for overwhelmingly passing a resolution condemning Iran's terrorist attacks, and said we must maintain pressure. The U.S. Navy has recently escorted over 1 billion barrels of oil out of the Strait of Hormuz, and he said they are transporting dozens of ships every day, but it has nothing to do with the CCP. So Trump said I must make a major decision: whether to reach an agreement with Iran, allowing them to rebuild a country more powerful than ever, or even one of the greatest countries in the Middle East and the world, or to quickly annihilate Iran, never giving them another chance to kill and destroy people and the country. I am going to cast them into eternal hell, make them completely lose hope for survival, and lose the possibility of future generations moving toward greatness. But I believe we will reach an agreement immediately after the election, because it makes no sense for them not to. They are watching my performance in the midterm elections, but they don't realize that I, Trump, still have two and a half years. It is the Republican Party running, not me personally. When it comes to Iran, we will not be affected by the midterm elections at all. The only thought in my mind is that Iran must never possess nuclear weapons. You see, Trump has now put Iran's final ceasefire—whether they kneel, surrender, or are beaten to death and completely destroyed—directly on the same level as the midterm elections. He has completely shattered the bubble of 'waiting for the midterm elections'—the idea that if the Democrats flip the script, Trump is at a disadvantage, or can't get a majority, then something could happen. But the question is, is Iran really obsessing over this? To be honest, Iran really doesn't have the heart to think about the midterm elections right now. Araghchi and Pezeshkian have already sought security from the Office of Foreign Missions. What the Lude Media program specifically told everyone this morning is that it's basically one step away from asking for political asylum. Because if he asks for political asylum, he cannot legally continue to serve as the President or Foreign Minister of Iran, nor can he possess the power to kneel before the United States, right? If he really defects, the Iranian side will push someone else out, and they would be useless. So, what they are playing is coming over and asking your Office of Foreign Missions to provide security. Regarding this matter, we don't know—the CCP was actually promoting that Araghchi went to Beijing a couple of days ago, and in Beijing, he met with Wang Yi again. Oh, Wang Yi lectured him quite a bit. So, you see, this wave of Araghchi going back is full of 'we rely on China, China you must charge to the front, we are counting on you CCP China, we are relying on you, Chairman Xi.' And Pezeshkian even specifically attended that rally claiming to be 300,000 people marching against the U.S. and Trump—that group of Iranian women in black robes holding guns. I don't know if it was hundreds or thousands blown up to 300,000. I'll just say, isn't this what we, Dr. Yan, were the first in the whole network to say? I see that Araghchi and Pezeshkian are playing a high-level 'black' double-dealing game. He asked the Office of Foreign Missions for security, and it was approved and announced just one day later.

Come on, isn't this showing your cards? Isn't this thing just too hilarious, right? You, Xi, tell me now, shouldn't you think about what you all talked about back in Beijing? Did you say anything you shouldn't have said? The moment you said it, it was simultaneously synced right over to the US. The US said, 'With simultaneous interpretation, we immediately know what you're talking about.' What are you acting all high and mighty with me for, Xi? This matter is truly so interesting.

Think about it again. Look at Iran right now—Trump has already said, in fact he said it over the past couple of days, either they get completely wiped out, or a major, decisive thing is going to happen, right? They've already arrived in the United States. By the way, why didn't they go to the Chinese Communist Party to ask for special security, right? You just know what kind of little scheme they're plotting in their hearts, right? So look at this, what Trump said about Iran, being so harsh on Iran, actually I'm telling you, Trump has known the outcome for Iran for a long time. Then you might ask, why is he dragging his feet and not going to bomb the mountains yet, why is he dragging his feet and not completely wiping out Iran? There's a reason for it, you see. Trump said those cowards and traitors are trying to spread rumors that US ammunition is insufficient, which is completely untrue. Our ammunition is more than you can imagine, and we have unprecedented production capacity, all top-tier equipment to replenish stockpiles. Moreover, in the near future, super ammunition factories will go into operation; the world's top defense companies are building 18 of such factories, and some will be completed soon. This rapid construction will bring about the rapid deployment of all kinds of missiles and ammunition, supplying allies. Remember, Jiang Tian told everyone earlier, among these there are not only Patriots, but also newly developed air-to-air missiles specially crafted for your CCP People's Liberation Army, targeting your J-20 or whatever PD-15, specially made. Oh, at this speed, the opponent is already as good as dead. You say they are still making ammunition now, do you think it takes this much to fight the Houthis? Does it take this much to deal with Cuba? Does it take this much to fight South American drug dealers? Otherwise, with all these munitions coming out, Russia isn't looking for a death wish right now, and North Korea isn't looking for a death wish either. So excuse me, with all this ammunition coming out, the US isn't going to just let it sit there and grow mold in a granary like that, right? Unlike your Chinese Communist Party, which hoards everything, lets the granaries grow mold, and then after that burns them down in a fire so you can apply for funding all over again, the US is not like that. The US will find a way to fire them off. So where do you think these strikes will go? Really, no matter why Xi came over to break the ice with him, it's just to let you see a lot of things you never imagined, to broaden your horizons, right? Of course, teaching you doesn't mean guaranteeing you'll master it, right? How much you can get out of it depends on your own fortune. But the US has done everything it could, right? Trump said we will soon see a world completely free from the threat of Iran for the past 51 years, and oil prices will plummet even lower than before the conflict broke out, saying that with courage and determination anything is possible, including Hamas. Last year, remember last year at the UN General Assembly, the CCP was so happy, supporting Hamas, supporting Palestine, fighting Israel, and even making Netanyahu so furious that he scolded and walked out on many delegates during his speech, right? When Trump spoke, his speech was also tampered with by you guys, oh, and the CCP was high as a kite. As a result, look, Hamas didn't benefit at all from the UN General Assembly vote, did they? Clearly, right after hugging Palestine, those countries turned around and ran to Egypt to sign this Gaza peace agreement, where both Starmer and Macron grabbed the spotlight first. And now Hamas is just something Israel can go in and catch one by one, right, and slowly beat them anyway; in short, the CCP has nurtured Hamas in vain. So the CCP doesn't even mention this matter anymore, right? And then Trump also specifically mentioned—I bring it up, I bring it up—expressing gratitude to the UN Security Council for continuously recognizing his Gaza 20-point peace plan and approving the establishment of the peace committee, right? And then you see, all the CCP's calculations came to naught. After Trump finished talking about Gaza, he then mentioned his efforts to stabilize the situation in other countries, such as Cambodia and Thailand. Truly, the CCP didn't even want to mention this first; when Cambodia and Thailand started fighting, the CCP didn't understand what was going on, and when it wanted to mediate, it found out it had not even half a cent to do with them. Not to mention that Chen Zhi's Prince Group lost both people and money in it, and the CCP's emergency rescue of 15 billion in crypto failed to save them. The smartest one among the top four has already been extradited from the United States to Japan—wait, extradited from Japan to the United States. So there's something very interesting in here. Trump knows you hate bringing this up, including Pakistan and India. The CCP now jumps back and forth between Pakistan and India, and it's so funny because no matter how it jumps, it sprains its ankle. So Trump listed all of these one by one. Just look at how Trump has only been in office for a little over a year and has done so many things. And then your CCP over there—even with Xi himself taking charge personally—couldn't figure out Thailand, Cambodia, Pakistan, and India right at your own doorstep. You ran all the way to Egypt and, besides looking at how mummies are wrapped and put into coffins, you accomplished nothing, and couldn't even protect your own bank. This comparison couldn't be any more tragic.

Then there is the Russia-Ukraine war, which Trump also mentioned, right? He specifically talked about the Russia-Ukraine war, saying he is now working closely with the leaders of both sides, and that this war will be settled faster than everyone expects. He said everyone has suffered enough—wow, everyone has suffered enough. Looking back, why are we fighting this war? Isn't it because you, the CCP, were so scared by the COVID-19 origin tracing that you had to push Russia out to be your 'Ice Sculpture Company'? Isn't that right? So, when the time comes, you can bet everyone will come back to settle the score with you. Then Trump specifically talked about the Venezuela situation, seizing Maduro's oil, right? He said that the actions in Venezuela prove that the United States will no longer allow threats to the U.S. to gain a foothold anywhere in the Western Hemisphere. He said if necessary, we will use unparalleled military force to defend the vital national interests of the United States. He said, 'As you know'—this sentence is so funny—this sentence is a direct irony, saying 'As you know, Venezuela possesses the most sophisticated equipment in the world from other countries.' Which countries? Aside from the old Russian stuff—and Russia didn't even say theirs was the most sophisticated in the world—isn't it just your PLA's equipment? The stuff sold to Venezuela, all of which was bragged about to no end. Trump said, 'As you know'—anyone who has watched CGTN, the New York Times, Bloomberg, or the Wall Street Journal knows that they bragged about the CCP's sophisticated equipment as if it were the best in the world, right? Trump said, 'Look, guess what? It doesn't work at all; it's far from it.' Isn't that what I said? It's like the CCP's Taobao 'cash back for good reviews'—it's all five-star reviews, and there's no time to leave a negative one. The U.S. means, look, those good reviews are faked, and guess what? It doesn't work at all; it's far from it. So Trump said we will not let these hostile, crazy, and pathological foreign adversaries infiltrate the Western Hemisphere anymore. Isn't this exactly what I said? The CCP, the Xi regime, besides being evil, is also crazy, irrational, and not thinking straight. Look, Trump also said it's pathological and crazy. We won't let them be there anymore. We are re-establishing that the U.S. will not allow these pathological and crazy forces to exist in the Western Hemisphere or globally. Then, he specifically talked about designating drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations after taking office. These drug cartels are the ISIS of the Western Hemisphere; they are by no means benevolent. They are sworn enemies who engage in war against civilization using murder, rape, torture, and extortion as terrorist means. So don't talk to me about whether they should be killed; just like with ISIS, they should be treated as enemy combatants, killed, exiled, or imprisoned with no possibility of release. And this is what the U.S. is doing—hitting small boats, catching terrorists, right? The U.S. says they are disappearing quickly; 97% have disappeared. He also mentioned that, regrettably, Mexico is the epicenter of drug trafficking and drug-related violence. Therefore, Mexico must reclaim control of its own land from the enemies of humanity. And this administration is also seeking a fundamental change in the situation in Cuba, where the communist regime is under unprecedented pressure. That is a completely failed state. See that? Trump mentioned 'Enemies of humanity,' and later he even used 'Enemies of all humanity.' What is Trump targeting by repeatedly using these two terms? It seems he is targeting Mexico or Cuba, as they are currently in the hands of drug traffickers, terrorists, and this communist regime, so these are the enemies of humanity. But in reality, as the U.S. State Department's charts have shown, without the massive geopolitical influence of the CCP, Cuba wouldn't have survived until now, and the drug trafficking and terrorism in Mexico wouldn't have become so rampant. So, when you say 'reclaim control from the hands of the enemies of humanity,' isn't this talking about the Xi regime that you are about to confront directly? Listen to these words together, and look—he mentions it again later. Even when he seems to be talking about terrorism, he immediately links it to the Cuban regime, saying the Cuban regime is coordinating the relationship between radical far-left activists in the U.S. and communist networks, such as the Communist Party USA, Antifa, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and other subversive radical groups, right? But Cuba is just an actor; the CCP's money, the CCP's national policy, and the Xi regime's strong support and institutional binding—that is the root cause, isn't it? So, look, Trump talks about taking Mexico back from the enemies of humanity, while also including the Cuban communists and groups like Code Pink. Isn't this telling you that these are the enemies of humanity, the enemies of all humanity? To be honest, neither Cuba nor the Mexican drug traffickers reach that level; only the Xi regime, which is obsessed with becoming a multipolar power, fits the bill. Then Trump also talked about the Greenland agreement, which we won't go into much, right? And Trump specifically talked about the Graham Act, saying he had to use it to pay tribute to him. Hey, we just talked about it yesterday; with the Graham Act, it's like building a large highway or railway bridge, right? Your trade agreement delays or non-delays feel like a small wooden temporary bridge, hehe. Look, why did Trump specifically mention the Graham Act again when talking about confronting the enemies of humanity? Isn't this act meant to hit you? It's the most handy weapon for hitting you in terms of trade, economy, and decoupling—a heavy-duty weapon. Alright, then he thanked the First Lady for her outstanding work, including being the first First Lady in history to preside over the UN Security Council, right? The CCP nationals are desperately trying to smear Melania, but she did a great job. She did it quietly and did it very well.

He also praised Ambassador McAvoy, saying that because Acting Ambassador McAvoy cut the UN budget, which led to the elimination of over 4,000 UN bureaucratic positions, the UN is now undergoing the most thorough reform in its history. You know, don't just say it's reform; you can tell just by the fact that the elevators are working better today and the teleprompter translation is working better. And then, at the same time, Trump also threatened that he would either sanction the International Criminal Court or dismantle it entirely. We have talked about this on our show before, right? When he actually starts doing it, there will be more updates for everyone, including his remarks on the protection of children, the protection of Christians, and so on. Furthermore, the U.S. also stated that from now on, artificial intelligence will be renamed 'Super Intelligence,' because 'artificial' sounds like it's man-made and sounds fake. So, Trump said that such a magical and powerful artificial intelligence should be called 'Super Intelligence' instead. The U.S. will completely reject any globalist conspiracy aimed at controlling this 'Super Intelligence.' In other words, don't even think about using that set of political correctness, fact-checking, and speech censorship to mess with this 'Super Intelligence.' The U.S. has plenty of judicial weapons to restrict it from crossing the line. As for your insistence that this 'Super Intelligence' will kill people, that is just alarmist nonsense, all of which is used to fool people, just like global warming, the Russia-Ukraine war, and the Russia collusion hoax. If you believe that, you probably still think the virus came from nature, and that global warming caused the mudslides in Tibet and Nepal, but in reality, that is not how it is.

Then Trump said so much, and Trump again mentioned the Declaration of Independence, the Declaration of Independence of 1776, saying that the American people have never been a nation that retreats from the front lines or flinches in the face of challenges, no matter how huge and arduous those challenges may be. Freedom is never a gift easily obtained by Americans 250 years later, and we will never, never, never surrender it. Just think about it, tomorrow he is going to meet with Xi, and today every word invokes the American spirit of 250 years, every word invokes facing the common enemy of humanity, every word invokes never backing down and bound to win. We might say, does Xi feel his eyelids twitching wildly today? How is it that every single sentence doesn't mention the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), yet every single sentence is about the CCP? And then he said, look, Trump once again emphasized that we must possess the will, courage, and strength to defend these beliefs and these principles, and we will steadfastly unite our will and march forward, facing the enemy of all humanity. Oh my, those words—that's what Trump said at the very end, right? Finally, God bless the countries of the world, may God bless America. I specifically went and looked at Trump's previous remarks, and this "enemy of all humanity," the source of Trump's quotes that I can find so far—sometimes he says "enemies of the people," and he refers to domestic ones, what Americans face domestically, for example, sometimes calling the radical left of the Democratic Party, saying you are the enemies of our American people, that's different. Now he is talking about humanity or all humanity. In fact, the last time Trump mentioned this term was last year at the UN General Assembly. Including that time, the teleprompter didn't even display the text for him, Trump improvised on the spot, right, cursing the UN up and down, and then making sure to specifically bring out "enemies of all kinds." The last time he spoke about this was transnational drug trafficking terrorist organizations, right, saying they are the enemy of all humanity, and saying the United States would use military power to destroy their networks, saying he would blow them to oblivion. Oh, at that time, no one had thought of it yet; at that time, the Southern Command hadn't started fighting drug traffickers at sea yet, Maduro was still at large, this Khamenei was still alive, cardboard boxes weren't cardboard yet—now look at you, a year has passed and things have turned upside down. Then Trump used this "enemy of all humanity" or "humanity" to further define things, which means let's put it this way to everyone: you connect these words of Trump together, although you feel he isn't directly saying the CCP is the enemy of all humanity, it's very obvious that he has made everyone understand when they listen that this far exceeds drug trafficking, this drug-terrorism syndicate, far exceeds any proxies, far exceeds the power of a regime as small as Cuba—besides your CCP, who else could it be, right?

As for this term, behind it actually lies an original source. We always talk about this enemy of all humanity, and our Sayings Network has always told everyone that the CCP, starting from releasing the virus, is galloping on the path to becoming the enemy of all humanity, and sooner or later the United States will label them as such. From virus origin tracing on 119, we started saying these words. Let me tell you, this term "enemy of all humanity," Trump's words are in English, but its earliest source should be a traditional legal concept in Latin, meaning the common enemy of humanity, the enemy of all humanity. That concept was originally used to talk about pirates, you understand? Pirates don't represent a normal country, nor do they abide by the rules of war between countries; they operate outside the jurisdiction of any country. No matter whose people or ships they are, they attack them upon sight, destroying the common maritime order of all humanity. In that era, moreover, any country that captured them could put them on trial. So it earliest came from this word "pirate," deriving from the legal definition of pirates. Now look, doesn't it look very much like the unrestricted warfare tactics of the CCP? And these pirates—later on, applied to things like human traffickers, terrorists, perpetrators of racism, and tyrants of despotism—this concept can also be derived and applied. So you see, Trump keeps repeatedly mentioning this at the UN General Assembly, and he mentioned it last year, immediately talking about using military power to destroy those [groups]. Last year he first placed this drug trafficking syndicate and terrorist organization here, right, drug trafficking terrorist organizations, such a rampant force in the southern hemisphere, including placing someone like Maduro who thinks he is a legitimate regime right here, and after finishing these words, he deployed military power. Hasn't a year passed, and now the southern hemisphere has already flipped over, even Iran has flipped over. So you need to know, now that he has put this out again, Mexico and Cuba go without saying; next, it's definitely not a matter of whether you let his troops enter or not, it's definitely flipping over. And behind them is the CCP, and Trump says we must face this squarely, I cannot let this danger flow into the future and become a disaster. Look at what we are saying: I tell you, this CCP directly faces the Trump administration, faces the US government, and having the label of the enemy of all humanity pinned on them is already just around the corner.

And look, the groundwork was already laid this year. Right before Independence Day, it was said that communism is the greatest fatal threat in American history, right? And last year it was just establishing anti-communism, but this year it's already reaching a point where communism must be eradicated. Just think about it, coupled with his mention of the common enemy of humanity, and putting Cuba back in there. Between the lines, this is like comparing a good student to a poor student, or someone with high IQ versus low IQ studying—it's all about whether you can look past the surface to see the inner meaning, the connotation, and the essence. When you analyze our take down to its essence, you will find that even though it might not seem like it's explicitly talking about you, the Chinese Communist Party, Trump's entire narrative is step-by-step forming a clear perception that this is the common enemy of all humankind. It is far, far greater than traditional terrorist organizations or drug cartels. Moreover, it is not just some small country simply huddling together with others; what it wants is a hostile force capable of rivaling the United States at the geopolitical level. While engaging in terrorism, drug trafficking, and all kinds of subversion—financial, political, and intelligence—it has everything. It has the financial resources, material resources, and manpower, right? It wants to completely destroy American values and overturn civilized society. Only this deserves to be called the common enemy of all humanity. Just like when the Chinese Communist Party used rare earths to make trouble, didn't Trump say, 'Do you take the whole world hostage?' This is what can truly match up against all of humanity and the whole world, right? On the positive side is the United States, and on the negative side, if you, the Chinese Communist Party, claim second place, who dares claim first? So this is consistent. And it can be foreseen that from now on, Trump will use terms like 'common enemy of humanity' and 'enemy of all humankind' much more frequently. Therefore, some of our viewers say that just thinking about Trump welcoming Xi makes them feel unbearable. What is there to find unbearable? Geopolitics is not playing house. By your logic, when the Treaty of Nerchinsk was signed, wouldn't Tsarist Russia have found it unbearable? Yet they stayed for 200 years, and subsequently took away the Tumen River. So if the United States puts up with it for two months, it will jump you, Xi, right into the pot and into the bowl, right? Coaxing you in—to put it bluntly, Grandma Wolf has to spend time putting on makeup to eat Little Red Riding Hood, right? She can't just hide behind the door and go 'gulp' the moment Little Red Riding Hood walks in, right? So you're saying the United States treats the Chinese Communist Party—this kind of suspicious entity that plays dead whenever it encounters trouble, right, just like certain animals, you know, sometimes they don't really die, they just play dead when facing danger, even lowering their respiration and pulse, and their bodies even get cold, right, making you truly think they are dead so you won't eat them or mess with them. Hey, this instinct of the Chinese Communist Party is triggered every other day. The United States also can't stand you playing dead, acting cowardly, and playing weak every few days, right? How can we bear it? We can't afford to waste time with you. Therefore, you see the United States, Russia, and all parties cooperating, right? 'Come along with me obediently, hey, as long as you come out, everything is negotiable, right? We'll give you this final lesson, and then you can go back.' By the time you are dragged to MDC, at least your compulsory education and training will have been completed for you, right? Hey, you won't be able to say you didn't know anything.

Alright, let's talk about the Iranian Foreign Minister requesting security. This whole thing is absolutely hilarious. Why else would Trump bring it up? He said, 'Oh, regarding Iran, we'll have a result very soon.' How did Trump put it? The exact words were that a deal with Iran should be reached very soon, so everyone shouldn't worry about the Iran situation. There was a direct quote about him wanting to reach an agreement with Iran—I can't find it right now, but Trump has been repeatedly emphasizing these past few days: either reach an agreement with Iran, or completely destroy Iran. It's up to you to choose. Now, look at Araghchi requesting protection from the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS), and the U.S. agreeing. You have to understand, why didn't he ask for the Secret Service? You see, even if it's a hostile nation, if they are coming to attend a UN General Assembly meeting, the U.S. doesn't want a diplomatic incident on its soil. For example, if someone were to create chaos—say, by taking out Araghchi or Pezeshkian—and then claim the U.S. did it, splashing mud on the U.S. to incite anti-American sentiment, the U.S. wouldn't want that either. Theoretically, it's not impossible to ensure their safety. But have you thought about this? We discussed a lot on Lude Media today, and I want to add two points. First, why use the Diplomatic Security Service, which is under the State Department, instead of directly requesting the Secret Service, FBI, or NYPD? By seeking the DSS, which is subordinate to the State Department, there is another layer of meaning: it can seamlessly integrate with diplomacy. What does that mean? Think about it: Trump has been saying that he might soon reach a historic surrender agreement with Iran. At this moment, first of all, you know you are in danger coming to the U.S., whether because you are in a state of war, or you are worried about extremists—maybe some Shiites or the far-left who don't like you two, thinking you are getting too cozy with the U.S. and want to take you out—or perhaps the CCP wants to take you out to sabotage the negotiations between the U.S. and Iran. Regardless of the angle, have you thought about why they absolutely had to fly here? Pezeshkian was just among those 300,000 people a few days ago participating in anti-American and anti-Trump protests. Araghchi was just there with Wang Yi, saying, 'We must follow President Xi and fight Iran's struggle to the end.' Why couldn't you just attend the meeting via Zoom? It's not like you'd lose your diplomatic seat if you didn't come; don't you have a permanent representative? Have you thought about the biggest bug here? If they are worried about safety, why bother asking for help from U.S. intelligence agencies? Just don't come. Xi isn't coming, right? Does that hinder anything? They insisted on coming, yet they are clearly worried about safety, and then they actually ask for help from a hostile nation they are currently at war with. I'm telling you, for example, the U.S. sanctioned Russia during the Russia-Ukraine war, and the Russian Foreign Minister has attended UN meetings. Even Castro came to the UN in 1960. But don't forget, that wasn't during a war. When Castro came to the U.S. in 1960, the Cuban Missile Crisis hadn't happened yet, and the Bay of Pigs invasion hadn't occurred. After that, Castro didn't come anymore. Now, they are in the middle of a war. When the Russian Foreign Minister came, the U.S. wasn't actively fighting Russia. So, in a state of war, they insisted on coming, and once they arrived, they didn't just want ordinary protection; they wanted the Diplomatic Security Service, which is related to the CIA because the State Department manages it, and is also related to diplomacy, while simultaneously having the function of bodyguards and security. What does that mean? Didn't Trump say he would meet Pezeshkian? If Trump thought you were going to be wiped out by him directly, why would he waste his time? Do you see it now? This is what I call their two-faced game, which has now gradually been revealed. And Rodriguez coming over also gave them hope, right? As long as things go well, look at Rodriguez—'I came with a firm and warm heart.' Next time Pezeshkian and Araghchi come back, they can also come with smiles, with firmness and warmth. And next time they come, the U.S. State Department might not even restrict them from buying luxury goods, nor stop them from shopping at Costco. Now they say Pezeshkian isn't allowed to go to Costco—that's also very interesting. Is it because they are afraid he'll bring back dog food? My dog loves the chicken jerky from Costco. Does Pezeshkian want to go to Costco to buy dog food, and the U.S. won't allow it? That is very interesting. Here, you see, they insisted on calling the Diplomatic Security Service, and that makes this matter interesting. For example, I have experienced security details, so let me tell you—those who have experienced security in the U.S. know that once you enter their protection circle, out of responsibility, they have to do their utmost to ensure your safety to the best of their ability. So, first, it ensures that the Iranian Foreign Minister and President won't be taken out by a third party—whether it's a false flag operation, retaliation, or sabotage of the negotiations. Second, they insisted on coming, and they insisted on calling the Diplomatic Security Service for protection. Doesn't that mean you definitely had to come, you have something to bring, and this matter is related to diplomacy?

So while they are protecting you, on the other hand they are also in contact with the State Council, the CIA has done an assessment for you, they have clearances like this, and they have all kinds of access. And besides, to be honest with you, think about it, when outsiders come over, how many pairs of eyes are watching? Are the CCP watching or not? Are the Russians watching? Are the Revolutionary Guards watching? Are the extreme Iranian terrorists watching here? They are all watching. Is it that easy for these two to surrender? Look at every time, whether they go to Pakistan, Qatar, or Saudi Arabia, isn't it always a massive procession with a large team following behind? How many informants are in there, and how many have ulterior motives? Look at these two, let's just say, others I dare not speak of, but these two I've mentioned, this is high-level blackening (advanced trolling), and we're just waiting to see it verified. Hey, look at these two, now that they've come over, protected by the Diplomatic Security Service, to be honest, if they want to hold any secret meetings, sign any secret agreements, or deliver any secret intelligence, can your informants still wedge themselves in from the outside? You might think he just went to the bathroom, or thought his stomach hurt and ran into the room to rest, but in reality, maybe they are with Trump, clacking away signing agreements. Hey, sign this and sign that, sign this too and sign that too, as long as you protect this family of ours, a few of us right? Looking back, I now see this, still the President, hey, this Mojtaba, you don't need to worry either, it's just a paper shell, right, we've taken care of everything for you, hey, as long as you wipe out so-and-so, once that's done, hey, overthrowing the mountains, overthrowing the mountains is easy to talk about, we've even brought out our internal maps for you, the CCP, the CCP is easy to talk about, hey, we just coaxed a bunch of stuff out of the CCP again, holy shit, could this meeting get any safer? By the way, have you guys realized, Iran playing it this way to this point, when did the CCP treat Iran like cannon fodder? I said it that day, the Iranian Foreign Minister ran over to this, on September 16 went to China, met with Wang Yi, how did those words go? Wang Yi was still smiling there, the CCP was still there with President Xi emphasizing, President Xi guiding, so after Araghchi reported, he said, we hope President Xi can go help us Iran more, hey, and then we will follow right behind President Xi and whatever. Wasn't that Araghchi cooperating with the U.S., playing you, Xi, into a Huang Jiguang? Have you figured it out? You thought you were playing them as Dong Cunrui and Huang Jiguang, but now it's them hiding in the back, the pledge of allegiance has been handed over, the agreements that need to be signed will be signed, and what's more, they have the Diplomatic Security Service protecting them. This can't possibly be just U.S. protection, this implies that when they go back to Iran, they will also have CIA protection, do you believe it? So now the Xi-CCP regime can do absolutely nothing to them, and furthermore, they've already blown you, Xi, giving you face straight to the front stage, oh, Xi was blown so dizzy that when he opened his eyes, he found out, how come I was blown right in front of a bunker to block bullets with my body? Did you see it clearly?

And then here, Iran, Russia's Graham-Rudman Act, doesn't this just put you—the bunker is right there, the gun barrels are already aimed, and the bullets are loaded? They blow you right into the line of fire. You could say this kind of gamble feels really secure, and then they over here, right, their security is completely here. Hey, however you want to coordinate it is fine, saying a diplomatic security bureau, all parties can reasonably get in touch. So when you see them approaching the State Council, you don't think it's unreasonable; when you see them approaching the CIA and FBI, you don't think there's a problem. And then, under such reasonable cover, hey, over in Iran, they sign whatever needs to be signed. Do you believe that in a bit, I'll tell you about these two being taken to the US, and now this reply says okay, giving you this permission, giving you protection? This is simply equivalent to—didn't Rodriguez say later on that we initially received a call saying if we didn't make a decision in 15 minutes, we would be completely wiped out by the US? Later, didn't he make the decision and turn into the Rodriguez of today? Look, it's equivalent to that moment, the US now replying with permission for the diplomatic security bureau to protect the foreign minister, which means protecting the Iranian president. This is telling you that the US now thinks, not bad, looking at your kid's recent performance, you've been pretty good during this period, acknowledging you—at least acknowledging you now. To them, how much more powerful is this, I'm telling you! And look at that, why does Pezeshkian keep crying out, saying, "Oh, I want to resign, and you guys won't let me resign, right? I want to build... wait, meet Khamenei, no, I want to meet... whatever, build a cardboard box, but you guys don't want me to resign, I've long didn't want to do this, now I have to do it." What does this mean? Doesn't this tell you that since I'm the president you all recognize, but I keep saying I don't want to do it, and you various factions in Iran force me to do it and threaten me, then when the agreements I sign are eventually made public, you can't refuse to recognize them? I've already desperately tried to refuse, and you were all too afraid to take this position for fear it wouldn't last long, so when I sign them later—look, I'm currently under US protection. When the day comes that I sign these agreements and something happens to Iran on the fourth day, you'll just have to accept it. Understand? There are games to all of this.

And in the middle of this, Trump specifically mentioned today, he said we might have to blow up Mount Qasioun. This incident happened while—look, when Trump was meeting with various world leaders, there were representatives from the US, Turkey, Jordan, Qatar, and Syria all here. Trump casually dropped this remark. Let's talk about it: the bombing of Mount Qasioun, we talked about this long ago. Unless the US shows this hand, you will always feel—especially the CCP thinks the US has no capability. As long as you dig deep enough into Mount Qasioun, you'll be safe. We are saying Trump has now explicitly brought this matter up, and at the same time, it's very interesting, Qatar, didn't they also come to attend the federal meeting? The Prime Minister of Qatar suddenly publicly said, "I need—we need to take a break. Ever since the World Cup, that is, the 2022 World Cup, we haven't had a moment of peace. Then came the October 7 massacre, and ever since then we haven't had a rest. No one lets us rest. Please, we definitely need to take a good rest in 2027." What do you think he means by making this statement now? Qatar, that's where Xi... you know, the place they are close to. Why can't they rest? Back during the Qatar World Cup, the CCP also had massive involvement there with components and stuff, meaning you, Qatar, are acting as a hub between the CCP, Hamas, Middle Eastern countries, and Iran, a major safe haven, a financial circulation channel. Now, Trump is going to talk with Iran, and completely settle Iran. Saudi Arabia, because of malicious intentions, is currently being messed with by the Houthis—right, the Houthis even opened their mouths saying you have to cede three provinces to us. The US says, sorry, we currently don't really want to send troops, our relationship with the Houthis hasn't completely broken down yet. And now Qatar suddenly pops up saying, "We are so tired, we haven't had a rest since 2022 until now." What does this mean? It means Qatar is now chickening out! They don't know how much pressure they've experienced behind the scenes. Now they know that if they keep stirring this muddy water in the Middle East and working for the CCP, they'll die without even knowing how they died. So, they are retiring to their hometowns, resting under the excuse of illness. Next year, if you still want Qatar to come help, I can't help anymore. By the way, what else is happening next year? Can the Iran issue drag on until next year? That's just telling the CCP, when you die next year and come looking for me, you won't be able to count on me anymore. President Trump, now bringing up Mount Qasioun—oh, how worrying. When Xi meets with him now, for example tomorrow, or the day after tomorrow, Trump might think of 2017, using the bombing of Syria as a welcoming gift for Xi. While eating, chatting, and banqueting, he'll say, "Wait a moment, let me show you the power of the US, alright? Besides the military parade, we also have a live video here, a live broadcast. Do you recognize this place? It looks very familiar, just like the air-raid shelters you dug deep underground in Beijing and inside the mountains in Tibet, digging your doomsday bunkers, because this is all Chinese technology. This place is called Mount Qasioun, look, now it's gone. Why? Because we just blew it straight up." Let me throw out a wild guess: could it be that in these next few days of Xi's visit, besides taking classes, he'll also get to personally experience the power of the US blowing up Mount Qasioun? That way, he won't be able to say after the US bombs it, "The CCP didn't see it and doesn't recognize it," right? You really never know, right?

And look, the funniest part is, they were originally bragging that Xi was going to bring a delegation of ten thousand business representatives, a grand and imposing group. Before this, outlets like The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg were hyping it up, saying he would bring them. Even Reuters specifically leaked the news last week, claiming that BYD, Xiaomi, CATL, Gotion High-Tech, Hisense, Wanxiang, Bank of China, COFCO Group, and others were all coming. Oh, the implication was: look, the CCP's economic power is so strong, if he brings these executives along, how could the U.S. dare to decouple? China's economic takeoff is just around the corner. All those narratives—saying Xi, no, Xi Jinping, has the upper hand and Trump is empty-handed—weren't they all built on this foundation? So why is it that now, 0.2, the Wall Street Journal has another report citing informed sources saying it's unlikely that Chinese corporate executives will accompany him? Oh, they have to lower expectations for any major commercial agreements to be reached at this summit. Everyone sees this now, right? Saying one thing and then another, these mainstream media outlets slap their own faces within a week, yet they never admit they were spreading fake news or conspiracy theories. We told everyone, forget about these executives or delegations. You listen to their nonsense—doesn't this verify what we said? Remember when Xi was going to India for the BRICS summit, didn't they also use Reuters to leak that he would bring four hundred entrepreneurs? Where were they? After he went, he was snubbed and left frustrated; we didn't see any delegation. Instead, he came back angry and made a show of force in Pakistan. Actually, it had no real impact on the India issue, but it just made India your enemy. It's clear that after Xi went back, he realized: the left hand is the one used to wipe your ass, and it reached out to shake mine—the photo looked like a little boy, it was so humiliating. And when he met Modi, he didn't even bring an interpreter, making him look like a clueless fool sneaking into a village. Xi, filled with anger and resentment, deliberately staged that show in Pakistan to save face and demonstrate against India. That border incident—what we call a play where nothing was gained—had a very 'Saigon' style to it. In other words, it completely lacks logic and is purely focused on the immediate moment. Why else would they say 'the mouse hanging the bell on the cat'? A huge problem here is that you are shortsighted; you can't get things done this way. He really is shortsighted; he doesn't even look two inches ahead. The question is, why didn't he bring them, despite the expectations for major commercial agreements? We weren't expecting any. Not only were we not expecting any, but we also said: given the current state of the U.S., you don't even know who is on the U.S. wanted list. You bring so many 'white glove' executives involved in civil-military fusion—aren't you afraid that once they arrive in the U.S., they'll be caught? They don't have diplomatic immunity; they could catch them one by one, and they might even fill up the MDC. How many of these executives have directed hacker operations, directed unrestricted warfare, or directed money laundering? It wouldn't be a wrongful arrest. And why did Xi not bring them? Was the Graham Act passed? I told you all about the Graham Act yesterday. Once it's passed, the CCP has to digest it slowly. Haven't they started to understand it over the last two days? Once they understood, they realized: 'Wait, the Graham Act is already here. If I still bring entrepreneurs, especially private ones, and try to use orders, jobs, and investments to bind the U.S. into making concessions, that's not how U.S. national security works anymore.' Now, the U.S. isn't waiting for an incident to investigate; instead, all agencies are required by law to take action and proactively verify which entities or individuals are linked to Russia or Iran, and then put them on a list. What does that mean? Everything is moving automatically. And you are still bringing entrepreneurs and corporate partnerships? If the U.S. says, 'I don't know about the rest, but let's look at this executive delegation first,' you tell me: BYD, Xiaomi, CATL, Hisense, Bank of China, etc.—which one can you audit and find no connection to Russia or Iran? Which one isn't playing a 'Wanxiang-axis' role in Xi's grand strategy of unrestricted warfare? By bringing them, you're just telling others to start the investigation with these specific ones. Once they finish checking, and you say, 'We are here to sign agreements,' the U.S. will say, 'Wait, these are the very ones our act targets for arrest.' So, look, why would he bring any entrepreneurs? You need to take a look at the ones you brought yourself first. Audit them: who is the actual controller? What role do your Party committees, the military, the SASAC, and national strategy play in company decision-making? Can you say, 'We are a private enterprise, I don't care about the Party committee or the military, and national tasks are just my personal tasks'? Can you?

Have you conducted transactions with Russian defense contractors or sanctioned military banks? Have you engaged in transshipment through offshore companies in Hong Kong, Central Asia, the UAE, Turkey, or Egypt? Have you provided Russia with anything—drones, chips, batteries, communication equipment, or related components, technology, and talent? Have you provided substantial services to Iran's aviation, oil, shipping, cryptocurrency, or military-industrial networks? At the same time, do you possess access to the US dollar system and American technology, and are you even listed on US stock markets or receiving US investment? When you string all this together, you have to consider that Iran and Russia are racing to submit their 'letters of allegiance' (toumingzhuang). The companies providing support to Iran and Russia overlap, right? When they submit these letters, they corroborate each other. So, tell me, why did you bring these entrepreneurs along? Isn't that just bringing people over specifically to help the US paint targets on them? Isn't it? It's as if Xi brought them himself; these are essentially gifts Xi personally handed to the US. Starting an investigation from here wouldn't be a loss at all. And why are you bringing them? Do small entrepreneurs get that kind of treatment? Isn't it because, first of all, they have to provide intelligence to your country, comply with your National Security Law, listen to the Party, support the rule of the Chinese Communist Party with Chairman Xi at the core, and then you have local subsidies, civil-military fusion, Party committees, and export quotas? Everything is controlled by the CCP, disguised as market transactions, and then, by coming to the US to cooperate, you are actually trying to leverage political influence. And then you want to say, 'This isn't a national security issue, this is a trade issue.' You can't say that. You ask, 'What evidence do you have? Why do you say Alibaba or WuXi AppTec are involved in civil-military fusion? I'll sue you.' Have you noticed that with the Graham Act, none of that matters? The US will step up; it must investigate. I don't believe that government departments, under legal requirements, with the NSA and others providing assistance according to the law, won't be able to find out what's behind you. You underestimate the US too much. Before, the US just didn't have this act, allowing you to exploit loopholes. So, not to mention other intersections, with these tools in the US's hands, Xi really wouldn't dare bring them along. Why bring them, right? They'd all get caught and end up staying in the US before Xi does, and if you can't bring them back, that's a huge problem, let me tell you. So, it's safer for Xi to go alone, as a lone commander. After all, we've given Xi some peace of mind: 'You come this time, I guarantee you won't end up in the MDC, and I guarantee you'll make it back.' Because Russia is still saying, 'We're waiting for APEC in Shenzhen to see you with Trump, right?' You can rest assured about that. Alright, let's chat about this for today.