Korean citizens resist election fraud! Putin's hometown was bombed! Xu Qiaoxin wants Taiwanese to be seen by the whole world as coming from China.
This episode primarily discusses South Korean citizens taking to the streets to protest election fraud, drawing parallels with political dictatorships in Belarus and Russia. It also covers the successful Ukrainian drone attacks on a refinery and naval base in Putin's hometown of St. Petersburg. The program criticizes Kuomintang (KMT) legislator Fu Kun-chi's push to amend the Nationality Act to allow Chinese citizens to hold public office in Taiwan, and comments on Hsu Chiao-hsin's remarks regarding the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' passport design.
Video Link:
Full Text:
It feels great to catch up on the news with Hard-Boiled News. I'm your host, Stan, and welcome everyone. Today should be a bit smoother. We're doing a live stream simultaneously in both vertical and horizontal formats. So, if you like watching on your phone, you can see the vertical version. If you prefer watching on a TV screen, Stan's live stream will show a large Stan on your screen, and you can switch to the standard horizontal version. Okay, let me save this file here. YouTube's ad settings have become very troublesome, extremely troublesome. Alright, I'll open the chatroom on my iPad so we can chat about gossip. Let's see who's here. Someone said 'Annyeonghaseyo,' I don't speak Korean. 'Annyeonghaseyo,' I cannot speak Korean. What's common in Korean? 'Tansamida,' 'Sumida.' It's like a Japanese taboo word, I don't know. I have absolutely no contact with this language, so it's quite unfamiliar. Today we'll talk about what's happening in Korea, where the entire nation is protesting against election fraud by the extreme left regime. I know 'Annyeonghaseyo' means hello, but I don't know what you wrote below. I know these two, everyone knows them, but the more advanced ones, I don't know, since I haven't studied it. Mainly, the topic I want to discuss with you today, let's wait for a few more people. First, we'll talk about election fraud in South Korea. I want to give you a perspective that you might have forgotten or never heard before. Because six years ago, oh my god, six years ago, I made a video about Belarus. Taiwan sometimes says 'Bailuosi' and sometimes 'Bailuosi.' I actually prefer saying 'Bailuosi' rather than 'Bailuosi.' I'll tell you why later. They use similar methods to suppress and maintain stability, meaning they crack down on protesters. We'll also briefly mention that Zheng Liwen is currently in CCP China. In Russia, at Putin's hometown, St. Petersburg, they are holding a global, he calls it an international economic forum. Although nothing about economics is discussed there, it's all about his plans to invade Ukraine and his desire for permanent rule. At the same time, when he welcomed foreign pro-CCP propagandists like Candace Owens, the St. Petersburg metro station was bombed. So, it's all bad luck. We'll watch a short video. Finally, we'll talk about Hsu Chiao-hsin, who has no conscience, the one who wants all Taiwanese to be seen as coming from China. She also wants to freeze the budget of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. I'll touch on this briefly. I think this is truly shameless. I've actually taken some notes. I suddenly thought of something. I want to talk about international law. The KMT wants to amend the law, and as a foreign spouse, I find it very upsetting. I want to tell you that they want to give Chinese citizens more rights and privileges in Taiwan than our own citizens, and even more privileges and rights than harmless foreigners from other countries coming to Taiwan.
First, let's look at everyone's comments: The Chowman 1984, Good day, good day Stan, Howdy, howdy, The Koreans are fighting for their freedom right now, Oh yeah, they do, And I do recommend you, Just go to my channel, And there is a video. Let me just talk about this thing. For example, if you want to understand the real thoughts of Koreans, you can also go to my channel. This year I went to the CPAC in the United States, the conservative conference, and this time Korea sent a very large group, including a former Korean prime minister. I even took a photo with him. They were talking about election fraud. I interviewed a civilian group that supports Yoon Suk-yeol, a conservative civilian group, and they specifically told me about CCP infiltration. When I released this video, the traffic was very poor, but because our channel usually ranks high, we often discuss topics that Taiwanese media don’t cover or that Taiwanese people haven’t become interested in yet. Now I believe the Korean issue has attracted everyone’s interest, so I decided to put it on my channel. Yes, I think I need to do this because I want to share it. I’ll show you this video. Korea, wait a moment, Korea, yes. The traffic last time was really, really terrible, unbearable. I highly recommend everyone watch this; it’s everywhere on Facebook.
Do you know about Yoon Suk-yeol? I saw the current reaction: Taiwanese people are very wary of martial law, which is understandable given the brutal history. The DPP immediately posted that there are reasons behind martial law, that the CCP’s arguments actually make sense, that it’s a direct provocation. I think this is very ironic: the Kuomintang, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan, suddenly says that Korea’s implementation of martial law is inappropriate. Yet when Yoon Suk-yeol wanted to implement martial law, it had even more justification than the KMT’s 38 years, namely total infiltration—Korea has become a shape of the CCP state. And you know what? Because I understand Eastern Europe and have spent a lot of time studying Russia, Belarus, Ukraine—countries east of Poland—we’ll watch the video later, or should we watch it right now? Let’s watch it now. I have prepared a video for you, so wait a moment while we look at these clips.
Oh, beep beep beep, okay, let’s watch. Do you remember the footage I showed before of Russian election fraud? It wasn’t just a staff member stuffing a whole tray of ballots into the voting machine, all identical. So Lee Jae‑myung is the Korean Putin, a dictator. Don’t you think that once Lee Jae‑myung, the Democratic Party’s candidate, is elected, his first move will be to forbid criticism of China? If you criticize China—though they say you can criticize other leaders—what Korean leader would they criticize? They would target Xi Jinping, the “pig head,” the Chinese dictator. At that time I happened to be at the IPAC in Belgium, filming a speech by Xiao Meiqin, and they were about to implement that voting law, which carries a few years of imprisonment if you insult China’s “pig head” Xi Jinping, the one who spits feces, which was not approved. Now the evidence is increasing, showing that Lee Jae‑myung is indeed an agent of the CCP. He previously said that Chinese people should say something to them. Continue watching.
Oh, this is very interesting. It says that the police speak Chinese, that the Korean police suppressing protesters speak Chinese, and that a spy was arrested. That's roughly it. Why do I say that the police speaking Chinese is interesting? Perhaps you've forgotten, but back in 2020, or was it 2021? Yes, 2021. I don't remember, so many years have passed. Speaking of which, our channel has been running for almost 8 or 9 years. My goodness, I'm quite the old media person. Back then, in Belarus, weren't there millions of people protesting because of Lukashenko's election fraud? The actual winner was Tsikhanouskaya, that woman. And Lukashenko, the dictator who has been in power since 1994, the one who looks like a cockroach because his mustache really resembles one. So, the protesters back then were very cute; they took slippers to the streets to protest because they wanted to swat cockroaches, as Lukashenko looked like one. Yes, and he suppressed the protests. He kept saying, 'I won, I won.' Because Belarusians are quite united, they didn't want this person to continue in power, so he truly lost the election. Therefore, the Belarusian police dared not suppress the protests. So, what happened then? Putin, Russia's Putin, provided police to Belarus's Lukashenko. At that time, the protesters directly said that those police were from Russia, not local Belarusians, but from Russia. Doesn't this sound similar to the Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests, when there were also police from Shenzhen? Many of Hong Kong's
Alright, when we get to "White Rus," it's what Taiwanese people call Belarus, but I think saying "White Rus" is more appropriate because Rus is a regional concept—like Kievan Rus, or in Poland they talk about Red Rus, Rus Chervona. It doesn’t represent Russia, it doesn’t represent the country Russia, because the origin of "Russia" comes from the Grand Duchy of Moscow, which is actually different from Rus. The concept of Rus includes the territories of present‑day Belarus, parts of Ukraine and Poland. This term Rus may also come from a Nordic language; there are various theories—some say it’s the name of a river, others say it’s a Norse occupation, a Viking profession, which is different from the modern Russia. So calling it "Belarus" in Chinese actually derives from a Mongolian word "Oros," a municipal unit. If you say "White Rus," I think it’s more respectful to refer to the people as White Rus rather than "Belarusian" or "Russian," because they don’t want to be called Russians. The nuance is slightly different.
Why do I say "White Rus"? At that time Putin sent police to suppress stability maintenance; during Hong Kong’s anti‑extradition protests, police from Shenzhen also went to suppress Hong Kong demonstrators. Now South Korea is seeing nationwide protests against election fraud, and I think that practice is very much like Putin’s, very much like Lukashenko’s, very much like the tactics of Eastern European dictators. And look at Lee Jae‑myung—once elected, he immediately implements laws that the Korean Democratic Party wants to push, which are not beneficial to the Chinese Communist Party. There are none, there are none. Moreover, his arrogant protective approach also displeases the United States, so part of the military force is being withdrawn from Korea because it’s unreliable. Wait, let me turn on my microphone; I now suspect that even Korean soldiers might already have Chinese people inside them—very possible, but evidence is needed. Are there police videos? It seems impossible. I think this is dangerous, so after the U.S. pulls its people out, China fills the police precincts. Now what is Kim Jong‑un’s role? I find it interesting; it should be two communist southern states—yes, two communist southern states—then the big brother helps you handle South Korea, and Kim Jong‑un takes over. As a result, Kim Jong‑un might say, "I don’t care about you South Koreans or you Chinese; I want to be with the United States." He tells Stan that I think Xi Jinping doesn’t really trust Kim Jong‑un, and Kim Jong‑un doesn’t trust Xi either. This has been the historical pattern. North Korea knows that the real danger is China. If you look at the books that former insiders from North Korea have published, high‑ranking officials write about the thoughts of South Korean elites, and a careful read reveals this. So I think we are now in a very surreal moment, and perhaps in the future Kim Jong‑un, to protect his own life, will run to the United States.
I also think we are witnessing a major global democratic backslide. For example, in the United Kingdom, the Labour Party deployed facial‑recognition systems to arrest protesters. In the Netherlands a few months ago, there was a small town of about eight thousand people that was forced to take in two hundred refugees—illegal immigrants, sorry for the imprecise term. The town protested, and the police were sent in with firearms, violently suppressing the eight‑thousand‑person community. I find that terrifying. I don’t know what will happen next in Poland, where the left has long wanted to push forward, and they have about half the vote. Taiwan is similar—don’t get too happy yet. Look at Zheng Li‑wen; Taiwan’s parliament is now in the hands of traitors, which should make everyone very vigilant. Someone wrote about LazyCV8G— isn’t that the legend of the three brothers? Lech, Czech, and Rus? Yes, there’s a myth: three brothers—one sees a white eagle and stays, founding Poland (Lech); another sees beautiful mountains in the south and stays, founding Czech; the third continues east, establishing Rus, and the Slavs split. That’s the story. Poland is Lech, indeed. Now in Poland, one beer brand is called Lech, many people are called Lech, and our President Wang Vansal’s real name is Lech.
It's interesting, Lee Jae-myung, Lee Jae-myung wearing Ming Dynasty official attire, he actually respects China. Yes, I saw that. Didn't he also take a selfie with Xi Jinping? Using a CCP phone. I think this is actually very insulting to Koreans, because South Korea's mobile phone industry is very developed, Samsung, LG. Recently, they've been hit by the CCP. In the competition, he didn't use a Samsung, nor did he say that our Korean phones are also good. He directly used a CCP phone, like Huawei, or Apple, or which brand, I don't quite remember. With Peng Liyuan, I took a picture. The curator really wanted to spank Peng Liyuan. Little Fatty is the same as South Korea. Yes, it's more helpful for the continuation of their regime. Little Fatty means he doesn't want to be the same as South Korea. Just the other day, they passed a law saying they are no longer pursuing empathy. I think his regime, actually, you know, you say communist. I don't see North Korea as a communist country. I see it as a monarchy, a monarchical state. And in the past, North Korea's survival depended on its pro-Russian stance. It relied on Russia, and then the Soviet Union, well, the Soviet Union. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, it began to rely entirely on China. Before that, it could still benefit from both the Soviet Union and the CCP. Especially during the Sino-Soviet split, during the time of the Zhenbao Island incident. Thank you very much, Dongnan, Xie Xiaozeng, thank you very much, Dongnan, thank you, thank you, thank you. Today I'll say it in Korean. Support Koreans, Koreans need to cheer up. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, North Korea was the most unfortunate because it only had China to rely on. So, don't you realize that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, North Korea directly experienced what? Famine. Some people say don't move. Speaking of which, we're going to Beidong tomorrow. It's usually empty. It's full everywhere. Everywhere. I sent someone into the system, you know your membership. Are you an idiot? I don't have a membership. I just went to buy things. No? Last time, I didn't get a membership. I don't have memberships for those stores. Because I care more about the individual items. So it doesn't matter if they send someone in. There are three stores everywhere in Poland. One is Zabka, one is Biedronka, and one is the German Lidl. You can just go to any of these three. They are all readily available.
Speaking of Korean things, he used a Xiaomi. He used a Xiaomi. Even more so, because Xiaomi is a thoroughly thieving brand. A thoroughly thieving brand. It originally stole Apple's system, and later stole a lot of Samsung's interface elements. But the Chowman 1984, the election in California had been rigged again. Thank you for the donation. Thank you. Thank you for your super chat. Um, there is a probability. Ah, what results? I haven't seen the California election results yet.
Are we now in a local election? Yes. But is it a primary now? It is a primary now, June 2nd he just passed it. But I have no hope for California, I have no hope for California. Then didn’t they spend a lot of time counting those votes? I don’t seem very interested in LA, look at the primary, that Spencer Pratt didn’t make it, right? Is it Spencer Pratt? Look at that, is it Bass? Is Karen Bass still more popular? Ah, yes, Raman, you mentioned Raman got more than Spencer Pratt, which is very strange. Yes, are you talking about this thing? Right? Yes, because that is very strange, indeed very strange. Okay, I’ll share this news directly, we’ll go a bit off‑topic, a bit off‑topic, I’ll open Google Chrome, hold on. Okay, this, OK. I’ll shrink it a little, sorry, make a small adjustment. Okay, can you see it? Everyone can see it clearly now, right? Good. Uh, this is NBCLA, over at NBCLA, they just say, originally, originally it was, originally Spencer Pratt’s vote count was just behind Karen Bass, who is now the mayor of LA, but the final result is, you see, he came in second, so he couldn’t be elected, so he couldn’t be elected. He was originally seen as a hopeful mayor of LA, but Bass will continue to govern. The problem with Karen Bass is that the fire in Palisades wasn’t handled well, and she posted many righteous statements, like saying foreigners can vote in the United States, that sort of thing. Spencer Pratt is more of a Republican‑leaning figure, so his support was fairly high at the time, and because of the current LA mayor’s policies, he also ended up on the poverty line. So you say the election was rigged? I don’t know, because many Democratic voting machines in LA are “Blue No Matter Who,” that kind of voting method, basically all votes go to the Democratic Party. The gap isn’t large, the gap isn’t large, but next time, hopefully Pratt will have a chance; he is a very influential person, not bad. But LA will be terrible because of Karen Bass, her infrastructure, homeless people everywhere, drug offenders everywhere, everything is not handled well. To claim fraud you need evidence; if there is evidence later, you could actually sue, in the United States you can sue. If Pratt thinks he was elected, he could sue. But My cousin didn’t vote for Pratt, She’s very upset that he didn’t win, I’m upset too, my uncle also voted for him. My uncle also works in LA, he voted for him, he thought the guy was good, a reality‑TV person, but very LA, he’s a walking representative of LA. But the LA city itself has fewer conservatives now, how did California shift from red to blue? California used to be a red state, more Republicans, especially Southern California, because the US military bases are there. It turned blue because the population changed, many people moved in, not only foreigners but also people from other parts of the US, who tend to support the Democratic Party, all moving to California, while the original Californians started leaving. This is the Southern California market, Southern California’s population changed, Northern California’s population also changed, but Northern California’s high‑tech industry brought a large group of Democratic supporters, so it turned from a red state to a blue state, previously a swing state. California also produced many Republican presidents, like Reagan, Nixon, and the previous governor was who, and Arnold Schwarzenegger, who was also a Republican, that Arnie. So many people, because the population changed, the population was replaced, so California went from red, swing, purple, to fully red, and even the most conservative Southern California areas like Centia, Gohra, Chen Xian, recently I don’t know if they can hold on. This year Young Kim is also fighting for re‑election, not sure if she has a chance.
And then that Daryl Issa is also very anti-communist, and he also said he's not running. Southern California used to have many, and now Southern California also has many conservative, Republican congressmen, which is also difficult. Arnold is also a RINO. We're not talking about RINOs versus sincere Republicans now. Is he a Republican? Does he represent the Republican Party? Yes. I think even if California elects a pair of RINOs, it's a good thing for the overall political situation in the United States, because you know what? When voting in Congress, they are better than Democrats, better than Democrats. You can say he's a RINO, but he did a decent job as governor.
South Korea's issues are finished being discussed? Probably finished. This is election fraud, and the results also remind me of Eastern Europe's type of election fraud. The visuals are exactly the same. If you've watched anything related to Russian politics, like the videos of evidence of election fraud that Navalny and his opposition used to frequently post before Putin killed them, it's all the same method, exactly the same as what's happening in South Korea now. Speaking of which, I saw news a while ago that Navalny would have been 50 today if he had survived. Still very young, just like that. The Chowman 1984, San Diego is still on the conservative territory. It's tense, it's tense, Southern California is tense. Currently, yes, but it's tense. It's also very Democratic. Who is very Democratic? Are you talking about Arnold? Or who? In Southern California, I think it's slowly, slowly becoming that kind of Democratic situation. It's very tense. Although you talk to Californians, many are dissatisfied, but for some reason, the Democratic Party wins every election. It's a pity. I hope Southern California can turn around one day.
Now let's talk about Russia's problems. I think this is quite interesting. We haven't talked about the Russia-Ukraine situation in a while. Actually, the situation in Russia-Ukraine is that Russia is stuck and unable to advance, and Ukraine's actions are becoming increasingly successful. Not long ago, Moscow was bombed, and oil refineries were bombed. Now, this is critical: the oil refinery in St. Petersburg and the base of the Russian Baltic Fleet have been successfully bombed. Putin cannot stop it. And at the time of the bombing in St. Petersburg, Putin was also in St. Petersburg, hosting his International Economic Forum. While it's called international, perhaps Tajiks came, or the Taliban came, which is also called international. And some American conspiracy theorists, alternative conspiracy theorists, like Candace Owens, who spread rumors about Charlie Kirk's death, and spread rumors that the French president's wife is a man, and also Andrew Tate, the human trafficker. You know, I think conservatives often, the leftists always criticize conservatives, I think conservatives are all Candace Owens, but Candace Owens is not a conservative. She has never been a conservative. She is a opportunist, and she is not conservative at all in her ideology. And people like her go to Russia. But I want to talk, let's look at this, I'll share this image with you. Keynote, Keynote, Where is my Keynote? It's here. Let me pull it up a bit. OK. Is this still the video from South Korea? We, OK. Alright, let's look at the next page. OK. This, this is the current scene in St. Petersburg. You can see the Baltic Sea, and there are drones, flying, flying, flying, flying, flying, flying, flying. Drones, right? These are Ukrainian drones, flying, flying, flying, flying, flying, flying, flying. Ah, this is their building, that building of the Russian oil company, the gas company, it was hit. So you see, Ukraine attacks, they always attack those oil refineries, military bases, things that are used to destroy Ukrainians. Only then does Ukraine retaliate against these. Ukraine does not attack residential buildings. Ukraine does not attack residential buildings. Ukraine hopes to minimize civilian deaths, which is very different from Russia's barbaric practices. The timing was critical because it was the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, and Putin is from St. Petersburg, and Putin was also attending the St. Petersburg Economic Forum. In fact, this way, Ukraine is directly letting the Russian people know that the war has reached your home. You invaded Ukraine, and this has led to the war reaching your home. Nowhere is safe, and the next target could very well be Putin. I think if the Ukrainians wanted to, they could directly kill Putin, but they are giving him a way out, a way out. Let me look at the comments. Thank you very much, Dou Nei, thank you very much, Dou Nei's SC, thank you very much, Dou Nei. I can imagine the fake ballots will happen in Australia as well, I had noticed some of the police speaking Mandarin way too fluently, and I expect they could be the agents from the CCP. Or talking about California, because where there are Chinese people, it's very likely that some people will be bought off. Of course, there is this possibility. Last time I was in LA, when I was transiting, I attended a seminar, and the customs officer, the customs officer spoke Chinese, and the customs officer asked me, I was here, the customs officer was probably Chinese, and he asked me, What's the purpose of my visit, why am I here, to attend a seminar, and he asked where the seminar was, what kind of organization, because they sometimes ask, and I said it was an organization of Taiwanese people, and he said, So you speak Chinese? I said yes, and then he chatted with me in fluent Chinese. So you see, even the customs officers speak fluent Mandarin. This is a problem that immigrant countries will have, and Australia also has it. At this point, it depends on whether the government has sufficient preventive measures. Preventive measures. I don't trust Owens, she just likes Tucker, I think she's worse than Tucker to a certain extent, They're all like anti-Semitic, Russia-loving propagandists.
They haven't reached the point of licking the CCP yet, but they are already licking Tucker, and they are already licking Putin. Next, they might start licking the CCP, which is very likely. Owens is that Black girl. So this is, you know, the facade of the country, and it's a good thing, because as I said, speaking Chinese is a good thing, because it's often needed, and some travelers don't speak English. But at the same time, you have to consider the risks, and how to prevent these risks. There is no perfect answer here, there is no perfect answer, it's about loyalty, and how to ensure a person's loyalty to the United States. And the US has something interesting, I don't know if I've mentioned it in videos or livestreams before, when you become a US citizen, you have to swear an oath, that you will only be loyal to the US, etc., to the US flag, to the US Constitution. So you have this obligation, so basically, if you become a US citizen after adulthood, and you are not loyal, your citizenship can basically be revoked, depending on how you interpret the law, how you interpret this law. But basically, a case can be established, that is, if you become a spy, but you become a US citizen, it means you lied when you took the oath. Lying is punishable by imprisonment, and your citizenship can be revoked. But people born in the US have had citizenship since birth, they have never sworn an oath, so they have not sworn allegiance to the US, so this is also a problem, yes, that's right. But some people can be bought, and you have to prevent them from being bought. How to prevent them from being bought? You need to ensure that your public officials have high enough benefits, like police and customs officers, these are critical people who will come into contact with classified information. They must have good benefits, and the penalties must be higher. This is where the penalties need to be higher. I think the problem in the US now is that the penalties for convicted crimes are not severe enough, not severe enough. Do you read The Epoch Times? I read NTD as well, I read both, or any newspaper, any magazine. Speaking of citizenship, because we just talked about Russia, Russia is on the verge of collapse, and Putin's regime is also on the verge of collapse. And last time, wasn't there a Victory Day parade last time? I said it might be canceled, but it turned out not to be. You can just listen to this, I can't guarantee it's real news, but Putin privately contacted Trump through channels, hoping that Moscow would not be attacked during the Victory Day parade, and indeed it was not attacked that day. But he forgot to mention the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, so it was attacked. But you can just listen to this, just listen to this. Let's talk about international law and Xu Qiaoxin's matter, because I think it's also quite crucial, and quite close.
Regarding the Nationality Act, recently, Legislator Fu Kun-chi of the Kuomintang proposed an amendment to the Nationality Act. The amendment aims to allow Chinese spouses and Chinese citizens to hold public office in Taiwan. Therefore, they want to add a clause to the Nationality Act stating that foreigners applying for Taiwanese citizenship must renounce their original nationality. This is directly written into the Nationality Act, but it will not apply to Chinese citizens, not to citizens of the People's Republic of China. This is blatant discrimination against people from other countries and sends a terrible message to the world: "I love my enemies, I only love Chinese people, and I grant Chinese people special privileges in Taiwan." First, I have already given Chinese people a special privilege: they can obtain Republic of China (ROC) nationality without renouncing their original nationality. Some people say, "Ah, Stan, if you want to become an ROC citizen, you have to give up your original nationality." I say, "I don't want to. I just don't want to do it because I don't want to give it up." I think this is extremely unfair. Why do Chinese people not have to renounce their nationality while I do? Is Poland harmful to Taiwan? Have Polish people ever harmed Taiwan? Have Polish people massacred Taiwanese people? Have Polish people said, "We want the island, but not the people"? Do we want to let Taiwan join Poland? No. Have Americans done such a thing? No. So why must Polish, American, British, and German people renounce their original nationality, while Chinese people, who openly threaten us daily, do not have to? Why do people from a country that constantly advocates for "keeping the island but not the people" and "building concentration camps in Taiwan" not have to renounce their nationality? And now, Fu Kun-chi and other traitors like Jaw Shaw-kong are pushing for a law to specifically grant this privilege to Chinese people. On top of this privilege, they are adding another one: the ability to hold public office. Chinese people do not have to renounce their PRC nationality and can still hold public office in Taiwan. What kind of protection is this for the country? What kind of patriotism is this? What kind of national security is this? Why can Chinese people have dual loyalty? Because Chinese people inherently have dual loyalty. According to China's National Security Law, any Chinese person should cooperate with national security agencies' investigations and provide information at any time. Anyone holding a People's Republic of China passport is a potential spy. What about Taiwanese people? Taiwan's Legislative Yuan is not preventing this. If Taiwan were to pass a law stating that individuals holding a People's Republic of China passport cannot hold public office, would that be unreasonable? For those holding public office, dual loyalty is unacceptable; they must have single nationality. In Poland, it's single nationality. If you want to be a member of the Polish parliament, you can only have one nationality. Poland acknowledges dual or even triple nationality; the Polish government doesn't care how many nationalities you have. However, once you aim to be a representative, hold a public office, or work in a government department, you must have only one nationality, because your loyalty must be to one country. That country is Poland, or Taiwan, or the United States. The US is not as strict; US representatives can have dual nationality, and US congress members can have dual nationality. But the US is not on the brink of war, and it does not face the risk of invasion from the People's Republic of China. So why, when Taiwan is clearly facing invasion from the CCP, are you saying – and don't tell me it's just the KMT and the TPP, these are legislators elected by Taiwanese people – that we should allow this? I think, you know, resisting China and protecting Taiwan is good. We should resist China and protect Taiwan. But Taiwanese people should strongly oppose, rally to oppose, and protest on the streets against this: the provision that allows Chinese people to hold public office in Taiwan. How absurd is this? It's like directly inviting the wolf into the house. You know, inviting the wolf into the house, then opening the chicken coop and saying, "Okay, here are the chicks, the eggs, and the wolf. Come on in, eat as much as you want." Instead of driving the wolf away, you welcome it to eat. Isn't this outrageous? Doesn't this make you angry, everyone?
I'll read out the donations first. Thank you, Lai Lai 6522, thank you very much for your donation. I feel that Chinese people have strong colonial sentiments. Are you saying you are colonized by Chinese people? Wu Rongshan, thank you very much for your donation. Vicky Orange, thank you very much for your donation and support, Stan. Stan can speak for Taiwanese people, and even wholeheartedly speak out for Taiwan, voice for Taiwan, and make videos for Taiwan. But I have to go to work tomorrow morning and can't stay until the end to watch the replay. Thank you, thank you for your support. We're pretty much done for today. There's one more topic. Our livestreams are usually about an hour long. I don't want to trouble my viewers too much. There's a simplified Chinese user, a user with simplified Chinese characters, who said that Poles are here to cause a color revolution in Taiwan. Do you know who is causing a color revolution in Taiwan? That political party is the Kuomintang (KMT). They want to turn Taiwan red, turn it into Red Taiwan, into the Taiwan of the People's Republic of China, the Taiwan of Chinese people. Taiwanese people are not Chinese. Taiwanese people don't want to be Chinese. Look at any poll, no Taiwanese people consider themselves Chinese, maybe 2%. That 2%, do you want to obey the views of the majority of Taiwanese people and be Taiwanese? If you want to be Chinese, that's fine. The CCP is very open to you now. Go directly, change your nationality directly to the People's Republic of China nationality. Why are you still clinging to Taiwan if you want to be Chinese? What's the point of wanting to be Chinese and still clinging to Taiwan? You can do that, it's your identity. But if you want to be Chinese and cling to Taiwan, and hope Taiwan becomes Chinese in color, part of China, then why? Why make it so difficult for yourself?
And let's go back to this issue, the dual nationality issue. Regardless of whether the second country is the United States, the People's Republic of China, or any other country, public officials should not have dual loyalty. Personally, as you all know, I support immigration. I also support open immigration conditions, but this is for non-Chinese. Because China is harmful to Taiwan, China should be screened more strictly. China should be screened more strictly. But Taiwan should relax its policies for people from other countries because Taiwan has an aging population problem, Taiwan has various problems, and there are many foreigners who are loyal to Taiwan. However, because the Republic of China is a regime of Chinese people and has strong Chinese clan consciousness, its laws restrict Taiwan in many ways, restricting Taiwan's development. I'm talking about the poison of Greater China that Taiwan hasn't eliminated. Currently, the Chinese regime, the Chinese constitution, and Chinese laws are not suitable for Taiwan. Taiwanese people often tell me that Taiwan is an immigrant society, but the Republic of China is not an immigrant country. Its system is completely exclusionary and anti-immigrant. Should we open up to legal immigrants? Why do we close the door to those who are willing to contribute to Taiwan, telling them to get lost, we don't need you? But we open the door and welcome Chinese people who want to destroy Taiwan every day. "Both sides of the strait are one family." Welcome! Fu Kun-chi welcomes you!
Then there is another shameless, shameless guy, a woman named Hsu Chiao-hsin, the biggest Red Guard in all of Taiwan. Recently, she also said she wanted to block the budget of Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. For what reason? Because on Taiwan’s passport, ‘China’ is not written large enough. ‘China’ is not written large enough; you need a magnifying glass to see ‘China’. But Taiwan is not China; Taiwan is Taiwan. I hate male chauvinism the most, extreme male chauvinism. So, then you hate it. Yes, I’m telling everyone, Tai Tai, I don’t know if Tai Tai can hear this now, because I’ve lived abroad for a long time. My hometown abroad, where I lived in Poland for a long time. Actually, on Taiwan’s old passports, ‘China’ was written very large. This caused several misunderstandings. The most exaggerated one was that customs officers and police would think you had a fake passport. Because why is China’s passport green? China’s passport should be red. This is a fake passport. But being mistaken for a fake passport is one thing. A bigger problem is being mistaken for a Chinese person, and that is the most terrifying thing. Because first, when going through customs in Europe, they will ask you to show your visa. Taiwanese people don’t need a visa to enter the EU. But the customs officer will say, ‘Why is it China here? Your passport says China, why don’t you have a visa?’ This is Taiwan; you have to check more, and it takes more time to check. The second problem is that when we applied for a residence permit here, they would write your nationality as ‘China’ on the residence permit. In Poland, it says ‘China’. And in Germany, in Norway, they also write ‘China’ on their documents. So, if there’s a problem and you need to return to your country or contact the diplomatic mission, they will see ‘China’ written on your residence permit, your legal document in Poland, and that your nationality is ‘China’. They will contact the People’s Republic of China or transfer you to the People’s Republic of China. If the People’s Republic of China tracks you through something like an Interpol Red Notice, and your identity document says ‘China’, EU countries might hand you over. Legally speaking, this could happen, and you could be sent to China, just because of this misunderstanding. At that time, I even argued with the administrative department of the Polish Ministry of the Interior, and we even sent lawyer’s letters, because they wrote ‘China’. Finally, it was changed to ‘Taiwan Resident’, and finally, the country code was also changed to TWN. But by default, because the passport says ‘China’, it’s written as China. And when we received our permanent residency documents, the customs officers came to our house to check if anyone was living there and said, ‘Why does your passport say China?’ You say you are Taiwanese, but why does your passport say China? Who wants to be Chinese? Why should Taiwanese people be Chinese? Taiwanese people have their own government, their own Ministry of Foreign Affairs, their own military, everything is their own. Why should they be considered Chinese? “
Then Hsu Chiao-hsin said that because "China" on your passport is not written large enough, she wants to block the budget for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' passports. Don't you think that's ridiculous? Are you trying to cause trouble for Taiwanese people in other countries? Or do you want to make it inconvenient for Taiwanese people to travel abroad? Because the word "China" – are you a Red Guard, Hsu Chiao-hsin? You are the most disgusting legislator! I really think the voters in Songshan and Xinyi, are you blind? Are you blind? There was Hsu Shu-hua to choose from then, why did you choose a Red Guard? The one who fakes falls, a terrible person with no moral integrity, as a legislator. Why choose a Red Guard instead of Hsu Shu-hua? Thank you for your support, thank you for your support, Stan, keep it up. Thank you. How absurd do you think this is? How absurd is this? I think it's extremely absurd. "China" is not big enough. If you think "China" is not big enough, then tattoo "China" on your forehead. "China," so everyone knows you are "China." Oh my god! Oh my god! And then you also make it inconvenient for Taiwan to go abroad. Blocking the Ministry of Foreign Affairs like this is treason. If this is not considered treason, I don't know what is. And speaking of the Republic of China, the Republic of China passport, let's look at the 1970s. Because it's so contentious, doesn't it say "Republic of China" on it? It's written in Chinese as "Republic of China." Foreigners won't understand it anyway. This is on Threads, someone shared it. Let's look at what old Republic of China passports looked like. Then I need to explain something to everyone. First, let's change the Window Capture to my browser. There are people who talk about these topics, but really, because I think Taiwanese people don't really care about immigration laws, and they can't even distinguish between nationality and household registration. I think it's just a pity, and that's how they get swayed. Have you noticed something? On those few passport versions, there isn't a single word that Hsu Chiao-hsin is so fixated on. It doesn't say "China." There is no English "China." Where do you see "China" written on it? There is no "China" on the Republic of China passport. The Republic of China passport, there is no "China." Originally, there was no "China," only "Republic of China." You can keep "Republic of China." The current Taiwanese passport also has "Republic of China" written largely on it. This ugly passport, let's not talk about whether it's good-looking or not, that's a matter of personal preference, but where does it say "China" on that passport? But what language is "Chung Hua"? It's Chinese. Where is it written in English as "China"? Would foreigners seeing this think it's "China"? No. Don't you think it's strange? Don't you think Hsu Chiao-hsin, when there's nothing going on, specifically looks for trouble, specifically looks for a place to cause trouble for you? I think it's extremely disgusting. So, calling her a disgusting legislator is quite fitting. What I've talked about today should be about all of this.
Zheng Liwen is now in the United States, visiting various pro-CCP organizations and pro-CCP professors. I don't think he can meet with people from administrative units; that's where Guo Zhenliang is just talking nonsense over there. I want to thank Fu He Hui from Taiwan for their support of our channel. As you know, Stan is a conservative, which shouldn't be a secret – a Catholic conservative. In Taiwan, there are also conservative organizations that promote conservative values, called Fu He Hui. Fu He Hui has a website in Taiwan and often organizes various events, promoting conservative values and discussing international affairs. They also offer tests to determine if you are left-wing or right-wing from a Western perspective. Aren't people discussing on the news now whether they are left-wing or right-wing? I am right-wing and conservative. Some people say they are left-wing, supporting universal equality, big government, high taxes, and high welfare. I support small government, low taxes, and freedom for businesses. You can take these related tests, and they are quite interesting. They have a segment where if you don't have time to watch international news, you can click on Fu He Hui's website, fratwm.org. It's very, very good. They organize and summarize major and minor events daily for everyone to see, and you can compare it with what Stan says. For example, in the Indo-Pacific region, in South Korea, during local elections, some polling stations had ballot shortages, and the head of the election commission resigned. Tens of thousands of protesters surrounded the Seoul polling station for two consecutive days, demanding a rerun of the election. We discussed this today. Then there's Europe and Russia. Today, there's news related to Russia and Ukraine. Regarding Ukraine, we discussed the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, where Zelensky sent a letter to Putin, and there were also related reports. What's happening in the Americas? In the United States, there was something involving Ace and Witkoff. What's happening in Asia? We can see it all very clearly. It's Asia-Africa, not Asia, it's Asia-Africa, Asia-Africa, yes. This is "10 Minutes of World Affairs." They have a YouTube channel where someone reads the news to you. It takes about 10 minutes to listen, and you'll understand the background and context of international affairs at a glance. So, thank you very much to Fu He Hui for their support of our channel. If you are interested in conservatism, you are welcome to visit the Fu He Hui website. I'll look at your comments and then we'll slowly wrap up. The stream has already been live for 66 minutes. Who wants to pay attention to Li Wen? Li Wen is the chairman of a party, after all. Why wouldn't you pay attention to him? He is the chairman of Taiwan's second-largest party. I expect many Chinese people holding Hong Kong passports will come to Taiwan in the future. Regarding the action of washing Hong Kong passports, there was indeed something about a Chinese person born in Hong Kong, related to mail issues. There need to be preventive measures, investigations, and checks by public security units. Of course, there are many anti-CCP people from China, and many who truly love Taiwan. But unfortunately, this country is very unfriendly to Taiwan. Therefore, we need to find a balance. On one hand, we should support the democratic activists in China, and when they immigrate, we should provide them with adequate protection, as it is a free and democratic country. But at the same time, we must exclude national security risks. National security risks, for example, if you come from these higher-risk countries, you might not pass the security clearance in the United States, or you might not reach a certain level. Taiwan should also have corresponding measures. I believe that Taiwanese people should not allow people holding People's Republic of China passports, or anyone with ties to China, to hold public office. I think this is a basic principle. This is not discrimination; you can still vote, you can still live in Taiwan, but you should not have the right to participate in politics. As long as the People's Republic of China poses a threat to Taiwan, you should not have the right to participate in politics. It's a simple logic.
Xu Qiaoxin herself, if she really insists on Chinese arrogance, then why doesn’t she simply give up her Taiwan passport? Because that would be unacceptable; she would not become a source of chaos in the legislature. Do you understand? Legislative chaos. If she had a People’s Republic of China passport today, she still couldn’t enter the legislature, because the National People’s Congress would not allow a KMT person to have that kind of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) affiliation. But I think DPP members wouldn’t pay attention to her either, because the PRC votes, and that’s how their legislature works. If you disagree, raise your hand—no, it’s passed. Right, why force Taiwan people into trouble? Right, they only harm Taiwanese. In Taichung there is a pair of Hongkongers, and Hongkongers are divided; many Taiwanese strongly support democracy and freedom. Thank you very much for the sponsorship. Why, when Poles were also caught up in the wave of Eastern European upheaval, could they achieve a government change through peaceful negotiations and elections, without the bloodshed that Romania experienced or the Soviet‑tank repression that Hungary suffered? The timing was different; Polish protests were also suppressed many times, and Poland imposed martial law. That’s why in ’89 they managed a successful transition. I often say on my channel that a democratic movement’s success depends on how united the people are and whether the authoritarian regime is in decline. If both conditions are met, a peaceful transition is possible. So it’s not only Poland; Czechoslovakia also transitioned peacefully at that time. Poland’s authoritarian government, the Polish United Workers’ Party, could not block change, and the Soviet Union could no longer fund it, leading to a peaceful transition after decades of struggle.
Romania’s case is a bit different. Romania’s situation, like other Central European countries, differs from the Czech Republic and Hungary. Their dictator, Ceaușescu, had a strong personal factor; he could have allowed a peaceful transition but refused, and was eventually executed. The Polish United Workers’ Party lacked such a strong personal factor; it was more of a party color, not a single ruler. A completely personal authoritarian regime differs from a party‑based one. Therefore, Romania’s situation is not the same, but Poland’s democratic transition is a very successful story. Moreover, the most successful aspect is not just the peaceful transition—Soviet dissolution was relatively peaceful, without civil war. The key after Poland’s democratic transition was implementing reforms, especially economic and political reforms, which secured today’s democratic development. The crucial point is to strip former communists and former communist police of political rights. That is a key element. So if China were to undergo a democratic transition, former Communist Party members should not have the right to hold office, and former officials should not have the right to be elected. They may vote, but they should not control the levers of power. I’m not sure if I answered your question.
Gao Jiayu's path is basically the same as Zheng Liwen's back then, but Gao Jiayu has gained more and is much thicker-skinned. I don't find Gao Jiayu that annoying. Gao Jiayu hasn't left the DPP; she's still within the DPP, you know? She has issues, but I think Zheng Liwen is a traitor. Gao Jiayu has poor character and is opportunistic. Gao Jiayu is opportunistic, while Zheng Liwen is a complete traitor. I think what you wrote makes sense, Wu Longshan, I think what you wrote makes sense. What you wrote, what you wrote is quite reasonable. My family's cat is now with my wife, carefree and without worries. I don't understand, carefree and without worries. I don't understand that Korean, I don't know what it means. You can write in Chinese, Japanese, or English, yes, or Polish, or German, or Russian, whatever you want to write. Don't write in Korean, I don't understand. Gao Jiayu using a joint banner with Shen Baoyang, her skin is really thick. Many outsiders are arrogant and selfish, with a colonizer mentality. I don't think we can say that. There's a distinction between outsiders and locals. I think in Taiwan now, the distinction between outsiders and locals is not as strong. Many independence supporters, many who support Taiwan's sovereignty, are of mainland background, and many locals, unfortunately, have gone to join the united front. Taiwanese are Taiwanese. Don't divide Taiwan's ethnic groups so finely. Her Korean translation: As a Taiwanese, I support revealing the truth and rejecting hypocrisy. Give it a try. I also suggest everyone watch the video I made with the representatives from Freedom Forum Korea, which talks a lot about CCP infiltration. The Great Wall is more praiseworthy than thick skin. Okay, OK. So today, our blue form is distorted. Well, we'll stop here for today. And let's give more support to Koreans. They are working very hard, they are really working hard. And Taiwan, keep it up. Democratic South Korea, keep it up. Republican South Korea, keep it up. That's more accurate. And America, keep it up. Europe, keep it up. Everyone needs to keep it up. Okay, thank you everyone. Last time at CPAC, I learned a Korean phrase. People who know Korean, please tell me if you understand what I'm saying, is it correct? This is God bless. Is it correct? Please leave me a message, and then we'll end today's live stream. Human rights, keep it up. Thank you, Stan and wife, thank you. If you look closely, you'll find that Zheng Liwen's subservience isn't deep enough, and his mentality is easily seen. Some people understood, some people understood. Okay, thank you everyone. Okay, bye-bye, see you.