Yoyi: Beyond Tradition, the Path to Innovation and Future Model Exploration for Overseas Democracy Organizations
Recently, the appearance of Bo Guagua has sparked heated discussions on the internet, and many hope he can establish a new organization to lead everyone in contending with the imperial court. However, Yoyi proposes here a theory on the cognitive limitations and innovation of organizations, hoping that everyone can think rationally about what these organizations are truly lacking at present.
In fact, what makes many overseas democracy organizations repulsive is that despite having numerous connections and investments, they do not seek ways to implement a suitable political ideal as efficiently and scientifically as possible, nor do they provide specific guidance to compatriots on how to resist, and they are even unable to propose profound theoretical insights. The vast majority of them only know how to shout slogans and tell stories, still clinging to the Chinese mindset of seeking promotions and wealth, and some even proclaim themselves as deities.
This method of struggle is extremely inefficient and sometimes even negative. Yoyi believes that in this era, organizers need to consider the environmental context and social needs, and think about how to engage in down-to-earth struggle from strategic and technical levels. Improper strategies can be adjusted, and poor technical execution can be optimized, but if there is absolutely no idea or awareness to do so, Yoyi can only feel that they are too incompetent and their cognitive thinking has fallen "far behind" the times.
Today, Yoyi proposes a new model of innovation, transforming the structure of overseas democracy organizations from the previous task-based model of news, meetings, and protests into a model of feature promotion, goal planning, and technical research and development. First, news and promotion are not the same concept here; feature promotion emphasizes one's own "product quality" and "political value," enabling more groups to choose your organization. For example, if using certain of your tool products allows people to obtain more information or prevent eavesdropping inside the wall, or if your political planning aligns with public expectations, people will tend to choose such an organization. Second, goal planning involves designing reasonable execution policies—how to dismantle control step by step and exploring from which angles to achieve this; this is the key to whether organizational goals can be implemented. Finally, the purpose of technical research and development is to study products belonging to the organization, such as AI or software tools, to achieve dynamic gaming with the enemy, thereby shaking the Great Firewall and certain regulatory mechanisms, and undermining the enemy's defenses from a technical perspective. This new model can corporatize overseas democracy organizations to a certain extent, while also stimulating other organizations to progress and creating a competitive effect.
Of course, Yoyi believes that at this stage, no democracy organization will choose the model proposed by Yoyi, because they cannot see it, and do not want to see it; this stems both from human arrogance and is an unshakable part of the development of this world line.