3/28/2025 闫博士谈对“Signal门”事件的看法

在这期节目中，闫博士探讨了近期引发关注的“Signal门”事件。她结合国会听证会内容指出，相关官员并未在聊天中泄露敏感或机密信息，且Signal已获美国政府设备授权使用。她认为左翼媒体如《大西洋月刊》编辑戈德堡的操作与当年《琼斯母亲》杂志针对她和班农的抹黑战术类似，意图借此放大事件并达到政治目的，同时指出中共一直在试图移除特朗普内阁中的“中国鹰派”。

视频链接：

完整文本：

I read through the articles about the Signal Gate. In yeah, I know that maybe according to certain regulations, people will argue that there are some violation of classified principles. However, as I watched in the hearing in the Congress two days ago, I see that both Mike Waltz and Peter Hegseth and other people, other officials involved in this conversation, they have clarified that they didn't release any classified information like locations or the strategy or whatever operation plans in that conversation. So I would say that yes, this is a mistake that somehow the Atlantic editor, who is a far left so-called journalist, involved into this chat. But I think it's important to figure out how could he get involved. Is that some hacking technology behind to make him kind of disguised and then put into this chat, or is just some other type of mistakes that they could figure out. But I would say that is, I think, it's too much for the media focusing on this Signal Gate, and it's better when they advocate for people's reason in Trump's administration. Because if this is a standard as the Democratic claim, I would say that they should have already resigned for all their ties with Chinese Communist Party, especially for those who actively involved into pro-China propaganda and visit China and build their friendly ties with Chinese government and also develop the network to help Chinese Communist Party involved into the U.S. business, politics, academia, and all the other fields. So I think definitely there are some people want using this scandal to approach their own agenda or their goals, but for me, I don't think this is so important as they try to make on media.

Don't you think that there's a since as you said there's a big mistake? I mean, first they're using Signal and not the proper network in the US, which is really you know you can talk freely. That CIA director Ratcliffe and also Michael Waltz has mentioned Signal has already been installed in the government equipment when they become the director in charge of this their department or their team. So if so, that means Signal has somehow clearance in the government usage. So then I don't think that's their fault to use Signal, and also if they talk about something that is not involving to talk classified things, I, I mean, I'm not a lawyer. According to what I read, I don't think that is so significant as the media want people to think.

Yeah, but still, I mean, for classified information, Signal is not to be used, and this was to me, it was clearly classified information, and so shouldn't Trump take measures and fire maybe Mike Waltz because he's the one who endorsed the journalist in the match? That will give China government a very satisfied result because, from Trump established new administration, Michael Waltz, Marco Rubio, and these people are some top targets China government want to remove from Trump's administration. They call them China hawks. And also, just because of the Signal chat, I don't think it deserves such punishment or fire something because the Houthis, the U.S. military's attack against the Houthis gets a big success. And we actually should also investigate that how this kind of successful attacks didn't happen in Biden administration because clearly the intelligence community already got information they need to launch attacks. And in the past over one year, right, since Hamas attacked Israel, Houthi has been did a lot of criminal, conducted a lot of criminals on the sea against the Swedish ships. So, I think they deserved attacks earlier than this week.

Oh yeah, well, that's not a question. But what is a question? I think to me, what builds up the Democrats' speech against the Republicans and against the U.S. is the fact that nobody's accountable. I mean, it has been two big mistakes here. Use Signal for classified information, almost 100%. And second, having the journalist, the Atlantic journalist, enter this Signal. I mean, it's not professional. It's not up to the task. And so somebody should be accountable. And so, if Trump doesn't fire anyone, then it could happen again.

Well, I mean, Pete Hegseth is another target because this guy, I was strongly in favor of him when I saw his, you know, he's a Christian and everything he's done in the past. But now I don't trust him anymore, and he's been just talking like, you know, against Ukraine and so on and so forth. So, I mean, don't you think that should be at least some condemnation from Trump instead of just saying no, nothing happened, and as you said, just look at what happened under Biden?

Well, that's not the question. I mean, the Republicans shouldn't be doing like the Democrats. Whenever something happened to the Democrats, they say, Well, look what happened with the Republicans. Well, I mean that's not taking responsibility. The Republicans are the ones who should be showing example and not deflecting to what happened one year or two years ago. I mean, sure, the Biden administration is a mess; was a mess. But should the Trump administration be the same? I don't think so. To be honest, I don't think that is so serious, especially according to what the information come out. But you know, we just read the things, watch the media. So I don't know. Maybe something else happened, what we don't know.

But I mean, also for me, I don't trust Atlantic that editor Goldberg because as a part of this disinformation campaign from especially for China's campaign. I can tell you how they can twist this kind of information to mislead people. For example, I have experienced something very similar to this. Like two years ago, MSNBC and a very far left, CCP supported magazine called Mother Jones, they have published so called video recording the conversation between Steve Bannon, me, and Mr. Mueller, and involved another three people they didn't name, but I know who they are. At that time, before the 2020 election, right before 2020 election in Trump's studio, in in Bannon's war room studio, at that time, we were invited by Bannon to have some kind of discussion to prepare for the election night that live streaming, because we draw that, and nothing else.

And during the conversation, because Luther and I want know more about what U.S. election means and how it works and how would Trump prepare for something. So we kind of ask questions, and Bannon explained to us that is a private conversation, but still there is nothing classified or I believe Trump can Bannon can talk about that through his war room broadcast, and somehow the other three people, some of them have recorded the whole video, a whole audio, and then later, as I know that they help Chinese Communist Party, and so somehow, after like one or two years, they released the aid to the Mother Jones magazine, use it as some material to attack me and other and President Trump, and they claim that from the audio they could see that Bannon is bragging that how Trump plan to gain the wins the election if he knows what he can do.

But that's just some basic conversation. I don't think no one come to us to ask what they should plan, and no one come to us tell us this is their plan. But they just released the clips like how this Goldberg released some kind of chat screenshots, and then they start to make up the stories, claim we get involved into disturbing the election or whatever things. I can tell you, if they release all the audio even video of that meeting, you will feel very boring. And for us, it's just some kind of normal conversation, and we try to understand even the basic terms in U.S. election. But from Mother Jones and MSNBC, they try to make it up to the level that how Trump, behind the curtain, plan to gain the election, and how they try to even connect to some later the January Six that problem.

So, I would say that I can see something familiar in these tactics behind the Signal Gate. And also, I have seen that in the hearing, Mike Waltz and the other people in the team has already emphasized there is no classified or no informational violation of the law. So, I would say maybe if they release all the conversation in the Signal, then people will realize oh, there is really nothing too much and I don't think they deserve some kind of get fired or separated or punished. This kind of result, and because from the beginning, I didn't see this Signal Gate as important as they promoted on media, to be honest.

Yes, also has a question because just the sixteen people or eighteen people in that group. I assume that at least one of these members should check who else in this team because we are going to talk about something sensitive. Even it's not classified, but sensitive in the group, and you should check the list who's involved. And also, you see, they have been talking about like as they released the conversation details. They talk about like Mike Woods asked other people to show who's your team member in charge of something. We need the list, so they they all report their chief member or other staff's name.

So during this kind of conversation, it's not as difficult for people to the members to notice someone else in this group who they don't know, and also Michael Woods has said he has no contact of this editor in his phone. And according to this editor's reputation, I also doubt whether he would be the contact in Michael Woods' phone. So, I still assume there could be the possibility of the hacking technology to disguise Goldenberg as a member in this team because we also see the additional report talking about Michael Woods some personal information like his some online account get exposed, along with the Signal Gate. And also I actually don't really trust the Atlantic Editor's Story, because I know that when Mother Jones and the other far left CCP-linked media reported something about me or Mo, how they obviously twist the fact and add what they want to ruin your reputation.