The U.S. Tightens Visas for Chinese Students, and the Responsibility Lies Entirely with China

Recently, the CCP's new wave of public opinion warfare against the U.S. is a strong criticism of the U.S. government's policy of tightening visa issuance to China. First of all, one point must be made clear: whatever the CCP opposes, that is the right thing to do. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has recently launched a new wave of public opinion warfare against the U.S., focusing its attacks on the tightening of student visa policies for Chinese nationals. One thing needs to be made clear: if the CCP is strongly opposed to something, it probably means it’s the right thing to do.

This time, their propaganda line is that the policy "hurts innocent Chinese students." Some dissident friends might find it tricky to respond to such rhetoric, so let me help break it down for you: This time, their propaganda line is that the policy “hurts innocent Chinese students.” Some dissident friends might find it tricky to respond to such rhetoric, so let me help break it down for you:

The so-called "hurting the innocent" itself is one of the most common tricks in CCP rhetoric. They never care who is truly innocent or who should be responsible; they just want to create public opinion pressure and make the U.S. back down. But the question is: who on earth is "innocent"? The claim of “hurting the innocent” is a classic CCP propaganda trick. They don’t care who’s truly innocent or who bears responsibility. All they want is to create public pressure and make the U.S. back down. But the real question is: who exactly is “innocent”?

If a person has been brainwashed for years, identifies with totalitarianism, worships tyranny, waves red flags overseas, besieges dissidents, reports professors, and suppresses freedom of speech, are they still "innocent"? Active ideological degeneration is not called innocence, it is called complicity. You come to the U.S. to study, but you want to bring the CCP's ways here to destroy the free system upon which this society relies for survival, so why shouldn't America guard against you? If someone has been brainwashed for years, supports authoritarianism, waves the red flag overseas, attacks dissidents, reports professors, and suppresses free speech—are they still “innocent”? Willful ideological submission is not innocence; it’s complicity. If you come to the U.S. to study but bring with you the CCP’s ideology and aim to disrupt the free society here, why shouldn’t America guard against you?

Of course, not all Chinese students carry original sin. But under the CCP's long-term brainwashing education, there are indeed quite a few people who go abroad with little pink thinking and nationalist fanaticism, and these people are the real reason why other Chinese students who want to study seriously are "guilty by association." Don't forget, it is the CCP that treats you as a united front tool, it is the CCP that makes you "firm your political stance," and it is the CCP that plugged that red flag behind your back. Of course, not all Chinese students are guilty by default. But under years of CCP indoctrination, many have gone abroad with nationalistic and pro-Party sentiments. It is these people who are the reason genuine, open-minded students get caught in the crossfire. Don’t forget—it’s the CCP that made you a tool of its United Front; it’s the CCP that told you to “hold the political line”; it’s the CCP that pinned that red flag to your back.

Everyone has witnessed the CCP's infiltration of the United States over the years, so we won't give examples to prove it anymore. Now the United States seems to have suddenly realized, and has begun a series of actions for the purpose of national security. Having little pink thinking is a potential threat to U.S. national security, and of course it should be carefully screened and prohibited when appropriate, which is completely flawless. The CCP’s infiltration of American institutions over the years is well-documented—we don’t even need to repeat the examples. The U.S. seems to have finally woken up and has begun to act, and rightly so, in the name of national security. Individuals with pro-CCP sentiments are potential security threats, and thorough screening or even rejection is absolutely justified.

[video width="720" height="1280" mp4="https://www.fanzei.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/fanrongy_1280p_20250530_233008.mp4"][/video]

What is a little pink? Someone who worships, supports, and defends a heinous totalitarian party. The reason why a person can develop into a little pink is enough to prove that this person: is either stupid (easy to be blinded, lacks insight, dares not question authority), or bad (knows the CCP's actions and understands the CCP's essence but still chooses to be an accomplice of the CCP for personal gain). Neither of these two types of people is what the United States wants, so it is completely reasonable for the United States to strengthen background checks and strictly control the issuance of passports to students from the CCP country. What is a “little pink” (小粉红)? It refers to those who idolize, support, and defend one of the most brutal authoritarian regimes on earth. To

become a “little pink,” a person must either be: (1) stupid—easily deceived, lacking critical thinking, and afraid to question authority, or (2) evil—fully aware of the CCP’s crimes, yet still choosing to side with it for personal gain. Neither of these types are welcome in America. Therefore, stricter background checks and tighter visa controls on students from China are perfectly reasonable.

如果真心想要来美求学，那就证明自己不是一个要么蠢、要么坏，要么又蠢又坏的人。首先要洗掉自己大脑中长期被中共灌输的种种意识形态。比如：党国不分，国族不分，党族不分；先有国再有家，国大于家；没有共产党就没有新中国；共产党是中国人的大救星；摸着石头过河；黑猫白猫抓到耗子就是好猫；中国国情特殊等等。 If you truly want to come to the U.S. to study, then prove that you’re not one of those who are stupid, evil, or both. Start by cleansing your mind of the ideological toxins the CCP has been pouring into you for years—such as: the Party is the country; the Party is the nation; the Party is the people; “the country before the family”; “no New China without the Communist Party”; “the Party saved the Chinese people”; “crossing the river by feeling the stones”; “it doesn't matter if a cat is black or white as long as it catches mice”; “China is special and different”... etc.

做一个有独立思想、追求自由民主、敢于质疑权威、心存善念的留学生，美国当然不会不让你来求学（关键专业除外）。 Be a student with independent thinking, a pursuit of liberty and democracy, the courage to question authority, and a kind heart. If that’s you, the U.S. won’t stop you from coming to study (unless you’re applying in a high-risk, security-sensitive field).

最后，签证不是人权，不是义务，是美国政府根据国家利益发放的特权。你既然申请，就必须接受审核，接受筛查，接受怀疑。你说，凭什么别的国家有学生就不被这么严格审查，偏偏中国留学生被这么对待？谁让中共养出来一大堆举红旗、喊口号、在海外给中共唱赞歌的“留学生”？要怪，就怪中共自己把这个群体搞臭了。你看，又多了一条反共的理由。 Finally, a visa is not a human right, not an entitlement—it is a privilege granted at the discretion of the U.S. government based on its national interests. If you apply, you should expect to be reviewed, screened, and questioned. You ask, “Why are students from other countries not scrutinized like this, only Chinese students?” Well, blame the CCP. They’re the ones who raised a generation of flag-waving, slogan-shouting, Party-worshipping students abroad. The CCP tainted this group’s image—so if you want to be angry, be angry at them. There you go—one more reason to oppose the CCP.