当「去中心化」遭遇政治审查与极权阴谋 - 从 $LI 事件看加密世界的潜藏危机
一、极权暗影下的「去中心化」幻梦
在理想的加密世界中，去中心化象征着自由、创新与免受权力干涉的交易环境。然而，近期发生在 $LI 社群身上的双重审查事件（OKX Web3 钱包屏蔽 $LI、Solana 上的 Jupiter Exchange “默认审查”）却使人们看到，政治审查与极权阴谋不但存在于传统中心化机构，更有可能渗透至打着「去中心化」旗号的加密领域，成为压制声音与控制舆论的利器。
二、有组织的攻击：中资交易所与「第二道防火墙」
$LI 项目遭遇的阻击并非偶然，而是背后存在精密谋划与利益勾连的政治打压。其中，中国政府在缅甸妙瓦底园区的控制手段与对加密行业的监控方式极具代表性。表面上，许多中资背景的交易所声称秉持去中心化与用户至上的原则，实际上却往往充当了另一面「防火墙」：
- 配合审查与信息出卖
中资交易所可以轻易地将大陆用户的 KYC 信息交给中国政府，一旦用户表达了与官方观点相左的政治言论，就会成为被抓捕或进行「非法资金冻结」的借口。用户的言论自由和私有财产安全都难以得到保障。
- 冻结资产与暴力执法
不少平台曾被曝出配合中国警方冻结用户银行卡、合约插针爆仓等争议行为。更有甚者，部分加密从业者在中国大陆遭遇精准监控与蓄意抓捕后，面临不公的法律程序，甚至是虐待与酷刑，以达到敲诈勒索的目的，匹夫无罪，怀璧（币）其罪。
- 境外园区的灰色操作
正如在缅甸妙瓦底地区的种种传闻所示，极权势力往往透过海外据点进行资本、人员与技术的转移与控制。表面上的「离岸」与「第三地」布局，实际上是为政府监控与操纵创造更大便利。
通过这些手段，中资交易所与相关势力共同筑起了加密领域的「第二道防火墙」，将他们想要封禁或打压的项目与声音排除在外。$LI 恰恰就成为了这样打压力度的最新目标。
三、$LI 所面临的双重审查
- OKX Web3 钱包的「假貔貅 Token」封禁
$LI 上线第二天，OKX Web3 钱包便以「貔貅」之名对其进行封禁。许多社区成员随后指出，OKX 曾多次传出与中国警方合作冻结资金、分享用户 KYC 信息的传闻。“去中心化”对他们而言更像是一块招牌，而实际上依然可能听命于政府机构，甚至利用“插针”操作打爆用户合约仓位，或配合洗钱等活动。这些指控，或许正反映出其平台背后复杂的利益与政治关联。
- Jupiter Exchange 审核「消失」与官方冷漠
Solana 上最大的 DEX 聚合器 Jupiter Exchange 多次对 $LI 提交的验证申请不做回应，甚至在官方 Discord 上对社区的质询持嘲讽与漠视态度。表面上，这只是一次“审核延误”或“技术故障”，但放在更大的极权打压背景下，看似有意无意的“搁置”也很可能是另一种隐形审查。这种“默认审查”在币圈更可怕——它没有直接宣布封禁，却以“长期不作为”的方式达到审查目的。
四、政治审查的阴影：加密世界仍任重道远
当交易平台和“去中心化”聚合器受到外部政治势力影响时，区块链最初所倡导的自由、公平与自主就会被严重侵蚀。无论是 OKX 的封禁，还是 Jupiter Exchange 的无视，都说明加密行业依然无法完全摆脱极权干预与利益操控。
LI 的遭遇中可以看出，在体量庞大、技术实力雄厚的平台上，去中心化的理念依旧脆弱；极权与 CEX 的共谋不仅威胁言论自由，更对个人财产安全构成巨大隐患，同时也暴露出加密行业在政治审查防范机制上的严重不足。
对加密世界而言，这不仅是一次挑战，更是一记警醒：加密世界要对极权势力的渗透说 不 ！
欢迎讨论🐱 对于加密世界里 CEX 和 Gatekeeper 的恶行，你们都知道些什么？欢迎分享喵🐱！
Under the Shadow of Totalitarianism: The Illusion of Decentralization
Translated by ChatGPT
1. The Dream of Decentralization in the Crypto World
In an ideal crypto world, decentralization represents freedom, innovation, and a transaction environment free from interference by centralized authorities. However, recent dual censorship incidents targeting the $LI community—OKX Web3 Wallet blocking $LI and Solana's Jupiter Exchange engaging in "passive censorship"—have exposed how political control and authoritarian schemes not only exist within traditional centralized institutions but can also infiltrate the crypto space. What was once a beacon of decentralization can be turned into a tool for silencing voices and controlling narratives.
2. Coordinated Attacks: Chinese Exchanges and the “Second Firewall”
The targeting of the $LI project is no coincidence. It reflects a carefully orchestrated campaign of political suppression backed by intertwined interests. China’s control methods in the Myawaddy area of Myanmar and its surveillance of the crypto industry serve as typical examples. Many Chinese-backed exchanges claim to uphold principles of decentralization and user-centric values, but they often function as another layer of the “firewall” for authoritarian control: (1) Complicity in Censorship and Data Sharing Chinese exchanges can easily hand over KYC data from mainland users to the Chinese government. When users express dissenting political opinions, this becomes a convenient excuse for arrests or the freezing of "illegal funds." As a result, both freedom of speech and the safety of personal assets are compromised. (2) Asset Freezing and Aggressive Enforcement There have been numerous reports of platforms cooperating with Chinese authorities to freeze users' bank accounts and liquidate their positions through forced manipulation. In extreme cases, crypto traders and professionals in mainland China face targeted surveillance, arrests, and unjust legal processes, sometimes enduring torture and extortion under the pretense of law enforcement. (3) Offshore Bases and Gray Operations As rumors about the Myawaddy region in Myanmar suggest, authoritarian forces often exploit offshore bases to control the flow of capital, personnel, and technology. These so-called "offshore" or "third-party" setups are often designed to facilitate greater government control and manipulation.
Through these methods, Chinese-backed exchanges and related entities jointly construct a “second firewall” within the crypto world, excluding and suppressing projects and voices they deem undesirable. The $LI project has become the latest target of this campaign.
3. The Dual Censorship Faced by $LI
(1) OKX Web3 Wallet’s “Fake Pixiu Token” Ban On the second day of $LI’s launch, OKX Web3 Wallet blocked it under the guise of “Pixiu Token.” Community members quickly pointed out that OKX has previously been accused of collaborating with Chinese police to freeze assets and share KYC data. For OKX, “decentralization” seems to be more of a façade, as its actions reflect potential subservience to governmental agencies. Manipulative practices, such as forced liquidations and facilitating money laundering, further highlight its complex web of political and financial interests. (2) Jupiter Exchange’s Silent Review and Indifference Jupiter Exchange, the largest DEX aggregator on Solana, repeatedly ignored $LI’s verification applications. Moreover, its official Discord dismissed community inquiries with mockery and indifference. What seems like a mere “review delay” or “technical issue” could, in the broader context of authoritarian suppression, signify another form of implicit censorship. This “passive censorship” is particularly insidious in crypto—it avoids direct bans but achieves the same suppressive outcome through prolonged inaction.
4. The Shadow of Political Censorship: Crypto’s Ongoing Struggle
When trading platforms and so-called “decentralized” aggregators are influenced by external political forces, the principles of freedom, fairness, and autonomy originally advocated by blockchain technology are severely undermined. The incidents involving OKX and Jupiter Exchange demonstrate that the crypto industry remains vulnerable to authoritarian interference and vested interests.
$LI’s experience reveals the fragility of decentralization on platforms with significant scale and technical resources. The collusion between authoritarian regimes and centralized exchanges (CEX) not only threatens freedom of speech but also poses significant risks to individual property rights. At the same time, it exposes the crypto industry’s lack of robust mechanisms to prevent political censorship.
For the crypto world, this is not just a challenge but also a wake-up call: The crypto community must say NO to authoritarian infiltration!
Discussion Open 🐱
What do you know about the malicious acts of CEX and gatekeepers in the crypto world? Feel free to share your thoughts, meow 🐱!