厘清LI币争议：投资目的与反贼圈的自我反思

我认为李老师根本没必要回应网上那些质疑，因为这些质疑大多数也没有买币。你没有买币也就算不上投资人，那你就没有对公司经营的话语权。即便你买了，买了一点，股权少到忽略不计，虽然可以对公司经营有话语权，但是否有决定权还是要看是不是大多数股东的意见。

如果你购买了李老师的LI币，那么你算是投资人。但是你投资的目的是什么，你作为投资人本身应该清楚，对你投资的标的也应该清楚。你投资LI币是因为看好LI币，以后可以分红么？显然不是，因为迷因币本身不提供分红机制。那么你是为了炒作此币，通过高抛低吸套利么？这种可能性是有的，我想币圈里购买LI币的大多出于这种目的。但是，这种利用市场价格机制的高抛低吸是市场行为，我想这类投资者应该是在入市前非常清楚这一点的。这就是为什么LI币发行后快速冲高，而后迅速回落。因为这类投资者就是炒啊，赚一波就跑是最好的策略。击鼓传花，最后站在高点的只能怪自己运气不佳，怪不得谁。一个有实际企业经营的利润做锚的股票价格尚且难以预测，你还指望一个连分红机制都没有的迷因币价格稳定可期？

排除了上面说的这些投资者，剩下买LI币的，我想就是纯粹出于支持李老师的目的（或者还有在支持李老师的同时通过高抛低吸套利的目的，但是主要目的还是为了给李老师捧场，支持李老师）。这类投资者事实上应该叫做赞助者。因为他们并不关心买入的这个LI币以后是否会带来收益，对他们来说，买LI币就是捐款给李老师。我想出于这种目的买入LI币的人也绝不会批评李老师发迷因币这个事情。

综上所述，李老师没有必要向没有买币的人做出过多解释。而买币的人，无论出于何种目的，也不应该对李老师的发币行为做出批评。

李老师应该注意的点就是在介绍LI币的时候不要对LI币的未来价格做出什么预期和承诺——就是他妈的爱买不买！没谁刀架在你们脖子上让你们买的。而且，最好向公众明说，作为一个反共团队，维持经营已经很难，想要盈利更是遥遥无期。且无论从机制还是意愿上，未来都不存在分红的可能性。你们有能力通过炒币赚钱你们就炒，炒亏了自己默默承受就好了。毕竟咱们迷因币本身就没分红这个机制。

所以，一个没有分红机制的虚拟货币，发行本身募捐的意义更大，或者说，纯粹就是为了募捐的——你想支持反共事业？我这里有一个机会，你要捐么？至于高抛低吸，那是赞助人（捐款者）之间玩的游戏。李老师能告诉你们我近期不打算抛就已经是对炒币的这部分人最大的善意了。

反贼圈需要通过此事来自我反思。是不是在圈子里存在着见不得别人好的心理？是不是自己没有做大做强的勇气和魄力？最近这股批评李老师的风潮让我想起了郭德纲当年被相声圈攻击孤立的事情。郭德纲：“原来我就像甄嬛一样，谁都想弄死我；现在我就像wifi，谁都想蹭我。”从这点来说，这些没有想清楚的反贼这次是坚定的站在了中共的一边。

中共最怕的是什么？是怕反贼们做大做强——人员众且金钱多。

参考阅读：《Meme Coin和加密货币的区别》

I believe that Teacher Lee has no need to respond to the online criticisms because most of these critics haven’t even bought the coin. If you haven’t bought the coin, you’re not an investor, and therefore, you don’t have the right to comment on the company’s operations. Even if you’ve bought some, if your share is negligible, while you may have the right to voice your opinion, the decision-making power still depends on the majority shareholders.

If you’ve purchased Teacher Lee’s LI coin, then you’re an investor. However, you need to understand your purpose for investing and have clarity about the asset you’re investing in. Did you invest in LI coin because you believe it will generate dividends in the future? Obviously not, as meme coins inherently lack a dividend mechanism. Then, is your goal to speculate on the coin by leveraging market fluctuations to profit through high buys and low sells? This is certainly possible, and I believe most buyers in the cryptocurrency world purchase LI coins with this intent. However, this kind of speculation is purely a market behavior, and I assume such investors are well aware of this reality before entering the market. This explains why LI coin skyrocketed after its release and then quickly fell back—because these investors are speculating. Their best strategy is to make a profit and exit. If someone ends up holding the bag at the peak, they can only blame their luck and no one else. Predicting the price of a stock backed by tangible business profits is already challenging—how could you expect price stability from a meme coin that doesn’t even offer dividends?

Eliminating the aforementioned investors, those remaining who bought LI coin, I believe, did so purely to support Teacher Lee (or to both support Teacher Lee and speculate on the coin, but their primary purpose was to show support). Such investors should more accurately be called sponsors. They don’t care whether the LI coin will bring them any returns in the future. For them, buying LI coin is equivalent to donating to Teacher Lee. I believe those who purchased LI coin with this intent would never criticize Teacher Lee for issuing a meme coin.

In summary, Teacher Lee doesn’t need to provide excessive explanations to those who haven’t bought the coin. And those who have bought it, regardless of their intent, shouldn’t criticize Teacher Lee for issuing it.

The only thing Teacher Lee should be mindful of is avoiding any predictions or promises about the future price of LI coin when introducing it—basically, "buy it if you want, or don’t, nobody’s forcing you." It’s also better to make it clear to the public that, as an anti-CCP team, sustaining operations is already a challenge, and making a profit is even more unlikely. Moreover, neither the mechanism nor the intent allows for any possibility of future dividends. If you have the ability to profit through speculation, go ahead. If you lose money, accept it quietly. After all, our meme coin inherently lacks a dividend mechanism.

Thus, a virtual currency without a dividend mechanism is more about fundraising—or purely for fundraising. It’s a chance for those who want to support the anti-CCP cause. If you’re willing to donate, here’s your opportunity. As for speculation and high buys/low sells, that’s a game between sponsors (donors). Teacher Lee already telling you that he doesn’t plan to sell in the near term is the greatest kindness to those speculating.

The Fanzei community needs to use this incident for self-reflection. Is there a mentality within the community that resents others’ success? Is there a lack of courage and determination to grow stronger? The recent wave of criticism against Teacher Lee reminds me of when Guo Degang was attacked and ostracized by the traditional crosstalk community. Guo Degang said, "In the past, I was like a heinous criminal, and everyone wanted me dead. Now, I’m like Wi-Fi—everyone wants to piggyback on me." In this sense, these thoughtless Fanzei are firmly standing on the CCP’s side this time.

What is the CCP most afraid of? It’s afraid of Fanzei growing larger and stronger—with both people and money.