Taiwan's pro-CCP washed-up artist Lo Ta-yu comes to chase clout

Program host Stan criticized washed-up singer Lo Ta-yu in a live broadcast for appearing on a united front program to lecture Taiwanese society and women, and analyzed the phenomenon of entertainers commenting on politics. Subsequently, Stan discussed the controversy surrounding Jensen Huang being involved in an extramarital affair and national security risks related to the Chinese Communist Party, calling for more McCarthyism in the United States and Taiwan to prevent CCP infiltration. Finally, the program touched upon American politics, conservatism, and the importance of religious activities.

Video link:

Full text:

Welcome to News Bang Bang, listening to the news is the most awesome, I am your program host Stan. Welcome everyone to watch, a warm welcome to our weekly live broadcast of News Bang Bang, I adjusted it to be a bit more centered. I look so tired, because I've really been so tired recently, so tired, so tired, so tired, imitating how Sillycat draws with his hands, so tired. Recently I've been busy to death, because there are many things to deal with, and recently there is also a lot of that, which is applying everywhere to attend some academic seminars, because my research has some results, so I will also report back to everyone on this part. Didn't Lo Ta-yu look at past news? We'll chat about Lo Ta-yu in a bit, let's put it in the title, I think this thing can be talked about a little bit. Actually, really, one thing, I think of course, everyone will say he discriminates against women, discriminates against young people, and is completely clueless about the current situation in Taiwan, all of this is true, he indeed did so, especially the disrespect toward women. I feel his wife, being his wife is so pitiful, one you know, we already moved and had three kids, and then we have a fourth one, who are you trying to scare to death? You Lo Ta-yu are also an old fart, and you still want to have a child, when I look at it I feel, how can there be such a rotten person.

Is my body a little better? Pretty much, after taking medicine it has recovered quite a lot, but these past few days have been relatively busy, all busy with some academic things, so you know at home very much, closing the doors, and then writing things, sending them out, and reviewing other people's stuff, it's a bit troublesome. And recently, let me tell you guys something very interesting, before we start chatting about political topics, let me tell you guys, we bought something today for our furry friend at home, because we often have to leave home in waves, so we bought him an automatic cat litter box, which will clean its own cat litter, and our cat went to study it, smelled the scent, scratched around, and then went to take a dump, and after taking a dump it jumped out, happy, running around, because after taking a dump it's just, and then it can be used again, so that cat now really wants to say, it has recently become a bit fatter, because the weather here in Europe is getting cold, the weather is getting cold, and as a result the cat's fur, it will shed, after shedding it becomes fluffier. Let me see, you guys are all watching the horizontal live broadcast screen, sorry sorry, right right, let's look at the comments here.

Have you been to the UK to see Peng Wen-cheng, who committed the same offense around the same time? Not yet. I'm in the UK—well, no, I haven't been there yet. Didn't he say before Christmas? But I probably won't be able to make it to the UK before Christmas, so I might need to change it. I asked him, and now it's January, because I have an academic trip to the UK in January, so we'll see him then. Because I was thinking, whether for him or for me, going abroad is the same, so let's see if January is better. Also, he said "before Christmas," which I thought was a bit weird. If you go close to Christmas, there are a lot of... you can't really figure anything out anyway, because it's already the Christmas mood, and no one is going to pay attention to you. So right after Christmas, we'll see. I still think that trip to the LSE is worth making, and then we can look at Tsai Ing-wen's thesis together. Actually, in the end, I really... after debating with him, I genuinely went and looked at Tsai Ing-wen's thesis. How should I put it? You can criticize it. Any academic thesis can be criticized. From my perspective, I can also find things to criticize in Xiao Ying's work, and when taking an exam, you might scrutinize it harshly, which is also fair. But Peng Wen-cheng says that this thing doesn't exist, that it doesn't exist when it actually does. You can comment on how its academic contribution is—that's fine, you can review and evaluate that. But the academic standards of the 1980s are quite different from today's, and furthermore, it's a law-related study. Then when I talked about something like "1.5 PhDs," he laughed at it. I thought, right, you can't say it like that, because her thesis isn't an economics theory paper; it's a law-related study exploring the impact of these trade barriers within a legal framework. Honestly, you can say it was poorly written—I can accept that phrasing—but that doesn't mean she didn't have what it takes to earn a PhD. This is still a PhD's product, still a PhD thesis. And you can say it's poorly written, that her contribution wasn't big enough, and that you could write a better one yourself, Professor Peng—aren't you also a professor? Although Peng Wen-cheng is from... he studied communication at Wisconsin-Madison, so you could write better than Tsai Ing-wen if you want, and publish it just the same; there's no problem, absolutely no problem. You know what? You also can't expect the thesis of everyone with a PhD degree to be extremely impressive. Because honestly, for a PhD, as long as you are looking at something, can you conduct a relatively large and comprehensive study, and can you make a new contribution to academia? That's all there is to it. And that contribution can be big or small. There are many PhDs; many people write PhD theses where their contribution is very small. You don't necessarily have to put forward a new theory or overturn an old one—it's the same thing. So a PhD is just a beginning, just a beginning. For example, I am also... you know, a new PhD myself, and what I'm busy with right now is taking my research results—aside from the PhD itself, which is that thesis, since the main thesis is generally read by fewer people—and turning those research results into journal articles, and then submitting and applying to journals in the UK and the US everywhere, seeing which ones might pass, and whether there are any academic publications. That will be a contribution. A PhD is just a beginning. And Tsai Ing-wen ultimately ended up in the political arena; you can critique her contribution to academia—that's fine, because it can be big or small—but that doesn't mean she lacks the relevant background. She has the degree, the educational background, and the capabilities that a PhD institution equips you with; she has all of these. So you can say it was poorly written—fine. But write a better one! If you want to write a better one, you can also write a review; you can also examine her thesis in great detail, line by line, and say there's a problem here and a problem there, and submit a book review. I believe there would be academic journals willing to publish it, because aside from original academic research, evaluation-type articles are also published by academic journals, and book reviews are frequently published too. So I feel like fussing over this thing is a bit... why do that? Why do that? I don't get it.

Alright, let's look at this. Thank you very much for the donation, Heiyao, thank you very much for the donation. Don't mythologize a PhD; you still have to look at what is actually done. A PhD, let me tell you, a PhD is important, but it's not some mythical thing. But you know, if you are doing academic research, you need this degree. If you want to develop in this field, if you want to teach, if you want to contribute to academia, you need to possess this ability. It's not a myth, it's the same for anything. You shouldn't mythologize any industry, you know? Just because you have a PhD doesn't mean you will be a good politician, a good mayor, or a good diplomat. It doesn't mean that at all. You might be, you might not be, because a PhD doesn't measure whether you can be a good leader. It measures whether you can do research, whether you can independently conduct research, find an academic gap, and then fill that gap or make a new invention. A PhD just gives you that ability; it doesn't give you anything else. I think Taiwan also often mythologizes doctors, saying how doctors are this or that. Being a doctor is just one skill—whether you can treat people. Whether you can be a good mayor, a good minister, or a good president has nothing to do with whether you are a doctor, right? There are all kinds of doctors. I won't comment on how Ko Wen-je is in the medical field, but he is a terrible politician. President Lai is also a doctor, but I think he is a great president. He is very capable in terms of policy, which has nothing to do with him being a doctor. It also has nothing to do with whether Ko Wen-je is a doctor. Except for the Ministry of Health and Welfare—if the Ministry of Health and Welfare has someone with a medical background, it is more appropriate. I think in Taiwan, we often see people say, 'He's a doctor, he's so amazing,' but that doesn't mean there aren't bad doctors. Look at that Su Wei-shuo, how embarrassing, he's also a doctor. And there are even more PhDs. You know, there are all kinds of strange people with PhDs, and even those who teach. You can watch my previous video on my channel. Go to my channel and watch it. I evaluated two professors, one from NCCU and one from NTU, who were talking nonsense on political talk shows. And you know what? They are both humanities professors. One said I don't have cities in Switzerland, and the other said the Second World War was started by Poland. You all have PhDs, you all have PhDs, but having a PhD doesn't mean you have common sense. Having a PhD just means you have that ability. That's why I don't like to keep bringing up my PhD and my academic research. Because my municipal analysis has no direct relationship with the academic research I do. Because what I research is contentious politics, I research contentious politics—that is, advocacy and mobilization—and I use the theories of Bourdieu, this French sociologist, to analyze the mobilization of these diaspora organizations overseas. But this has no direct relationship with Taiwan's politics, so I don't keep talking about it. But I say, 'NTU doctor, you are an NTU doctor, but you are a lousy mayor,' you know? It's just a simple logic.

Liwen, hello hello hello hello Liwen. Peng Liwen is not the real Liwen, our Liwen is the good Liwen, the KMT's Liwen is the bad Liwen. I don't use 'waishengren' (mainlander) to refer to Taiwanese people or 'mainland Chinese in Taiwan.' This kind of term implies a 'small Taiwan' under the 'Greater China' ideology. That is indeed very well said, very well said. 'Waishengren'—because, yeah, what is a province? Taiwan has frozen the provincial level, right? Taiwan isn't using provinces anymore. Let me tell you, let me tell you something better. There is an academic book I really want to recommend to everyone. Give me a minute, give me a minute, let me show you. I highly recommend everyone buy this book, or check if you can borrow it from the library. Wait for me, because this has to do with 'benshengren' (native Taiwanese) and 'waishengren.' Wait for me. I don't know if there is a Chinese version of this, but the English is very brilliant. This book, 'The Great Exodus from China'—'Exodus' is the Book of Exodus, it's about the great escape from China. It's this book. It's an academic book, written by, I think, Yang Meng-hsuan. It's about the stories of these 'waishengren' coming to Taiwan. I don't know, it's an academic book, right? It has statistics, and it looks at historical materials, and it compares, for example, the crime rates of 'waishengren' with 'benshengren.' It's a rather thick book, but I think if you want to understand Taiwan's history and understand this 'waisheng' group in Taiwan, this is a must-read. This is a must-read. But, let me tell you, it's about the usage in English, because in the parentheses, of course, there is Chinese.

Support Poland-stan, for speaking up for Taiwan like this, thank you for 'Xiaodong-ing' (referencing Xu Xiaodong), thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, uh, what can you do with this character? Hehehe, what can you do with three 'gold' characters? Hehehe, cute, okay, uh, I, I, I tell you, in that, he uses the word 'Mainlanders', just mainlanders, right? Just 'Mainlanders', because when you talk about 'benshengren' (native Taiwanese) and 'waishengren' (mainlanders), it's hard to express in English, so this book is about 'Mainlanders in Taiwan', which is people from the mainland in Taiwan, people with a Chinese background, that's also a way to put it, that's a method. Now you say 'pro-Taiwan Chinese', I think 'pro-Taiwan Chinese' is also a good term, because they identify as Chinese, so it's not about 'benshengren' or 'waishengren', you either identify as Chinese, or you identify as Taiwanese, or you think you are both. So, saying 'waishengren' are being bullied or treated a certain way, I think that is an absolutely absurd claim, because if you just look at Taiwan's history, it has always been these mainlanders, these Chinese who came to Taiwan, who have been bullying the Taiwanese, it has always been like that. I don't see 'benshengren' stealing 'waishengren's' land, no, I don't. I see these refugees from China, those refugees from the great exodus, it was them who stole Taiwanese people's things, stole Taiwanese people's money, stole Taiwanese people's land, threw Taiwanese people into prison, and even massacred Taiwanese people. KMT, I think there used to be a pun, saying KMT stands for 'Killed many Taiwanese', so the Kuomintang, using the English 'KMT', it means they killed many Taiwanese, that's it, that's exactly what it is.

And then this guy, Lo Ta-yu, you know, we were just saying a bit earlier that a PhD is a PhD, a doctor is a doctor, and a singer is a singer. Just because you are a singer doesn't mean you understand politics, nor does it mean you understand sociology, nor does it mean you understand the overall development of Taiwan's society. To be honest, I know that for many viewers, Lo Ta-yu's songs might be that nostalgic memory of Childhood or whatever. When he went on that show hosted by Tang Xianglong, I actually went out of my way to listen to the whole thing. Once he started, you know, his guitar playing wasn't all that great, and his singing—maybe when he was young, his voice was relatively nicer, perhaps, perhaps I won't judge that, but his singing wasn't good either, and the lyrics are all just about this lovey-dovey stuff. I don't know where he gets such huge confidence; I don't know where he gets such huge confidence, you know, just from singing a few songs. You haven't been in the cultural industry for very long; you've only written one book and just a few songs, and yet you go around claiming to be a cultural figure. I look at young Taiwanese artists, singers, and writers, and they wouldn't inexplicably say, "I am a cultural figure," would they? Even if there genuinely were great cultural figures who contributed to world culture—like Taiwan's many classical musicians, music creators, violinists, and pianists who are internationally certified and seen by the world, or game companies whose games are played worldwide—they wouldn't suddenly say, "I am a cultural figure." On the contrary, I see that it's precisely these people with zero talent, these Lo Ta-yus of the past... because let me tell you, let me tell you, the existence and popularity of people like Lo Ta-yu could only be caused by the martial law period of an authoritarian state, because any authoritarian state turns into a cultural desert. Since your channels for contacting the outside world are quite limited, some mediocre people get noticed because your opportunities to come into contact with world-class things are also very few. So during such a martial law period, they got hyped up, but they're just so-so. You know, we can play three chords on a guitar and sing along; it's not hard. There are plenty of singers in Taiwan who are much better than Lo Ta-yu, truly a whole lot of them. This isn't about saying anything else, but you know, and then once he starts talking, it's just nonsense. As soon as that old man opens his mouth, once he opens his mouth, oh god, you know? I look at this guy, and you really do have confidence, you really do take yourself seriously, and then talking about women this and women that, women not having children, women whatever—oh god! Taiwan's birth rate is low, and you say it's Tsai Ing-wen's fault. What does it have to do with Tsai Ing-wen? Taiwan's birth rate being low, first of all, is a global trend in developed countries. If you had even a tiny bit of common sense, but you don't—you love to talk nonsense without any common sense, and then you say, among today's developed countries, which country has a high birth rate? Which country has a high birth rate? Which country's birth rate isn't going down, especially Asian developed countries like Japan and Korea? Korea is even worse off than Taiwan. And then you say this is a problem caused by Tsai Ing-wen? What does it have to do with Tsai Ing-wen? And then saying things like people with children get taxed or whatever, on what grounds? Many people who have dedicated their entire lives to Taiwan don't have children either. Whether to have children or not is every Taiwanese person's own decision and freedom. Often, this freedom isn't something you can just have whenever you want; economic environments and conditions often do not permit it. This is not a problem inherent to Taiwan itself; it's a macro-environment problem, a macro-environment problem. Furthermore, you KMT supporters keep trying to push Taiwan to the brink of war with the CCP. People like you in the KMT want mainland Chinese people to come to Taiwan completely unconditionally, to grab Taiwanese people's resources, grab Taiwanese people's money, and grab Taiwanese people's jobs. And you still have the nerve to talk? You still have the nerve to talk about how the CCP also knows what it will do to Taiwan if it occupies it? And then you go on that show hosted by Tang Xianglong, who calls himself a Chinese person. Where is Tang Xianglong's son? Why didn't Tang Xianglong's son go study at Peking University, Fudan University, Renmin University, or Beijing Foreign Studies University? No, he went to study at Arizona State University! I made a short video about this before. Arizona State University is not among the top 10 most powerful schools in the U.S. It's okay, it's a state university, quite good, it's okay, but it's not a top-ranked school; it's just average, and it has some academic contributions. But since you act like anything Chinese is such an honor, why didn't you send him to study at Peking University? Peking University's world ranking is definitely higher than Arizona State University's, absolutely! No, you sent him to Arizona to study, and besides, people really like the United States. You can't dislike the United States; the U.S. is so great. I love the U.S. to death myself, you know? I believe many Taiwanese people are just like me. I have family in the U.S., and you would also feel that the U.S. is an absolutely fantastic place, and a country that has always contributed to Taiwan, always strongly supported Taiwan, and is very friendly toward Taiwan. And then this Lo Ta-yu, looking at whatever election—"Behind it all is the United States!" Where is the evidence?

You don't even need to provide evidence, I think UFO Radio should just be called Bandit Radio (匪碟), you need to change the tone slightly—not UFO (飞碟), but Bandit Radio (匪碟). And honestly, the guests those UFO people invite really have nothing of substance to offer. To be frank, Tang Xianglong invites an outdated singer, because I believe nobody has listened to Luo Dayou's songs in decades. There should be better ones, right? And Luo Dayou is still whining over there, saying, oh, Taiwanese people only listen to Korean songs, oh how great they sound. Well, write better ones then! In Taiwan, it's a market economy; if you write good stuff, a whole bunch of people will definitely listen. What you write is just "I love you, you love me" with three guitar chords. Do you really need to? Do you really need to? And you want to compare yourself to Korean groups? You want to compare this to Korean groups? First of all, Luo Dayou, do you and Korean groups have even 10% of the dedication that Korean groups have, you know? Get your dance, your music, and everything else trained to be as formidable as Korean groups first, and then we'll talk. Fifty years ago, playing three chords on a guitar with "Lukang Town" might have worked, and maybe you could become famous, perhaps. But sorry, now it's the Gen Z era, extremely Gen Z, and there is no room left for you, Luo Dayou, no survival space in today's music scene. Besides, Taiwan has many great singers and many great creators. Look at Megaport Festival, it's packed every single time, all local Taiwanese bands. That just means Taiwanese people are sick of listening to you old farts, and don't want to listen anymore. And you know what? There are actually still some stubborn folks whining about Korean groups over there. Good grief.

Seriously, about that woman, do you know what she said? That there is a conspiracy theory behind it involving the US? Conspiracy theories are easy for people to believe, and they don't require verification. So I'm thinking, the standard of that radio station is low enough. A political commentary program invites someone with absolutely no common sense about politics to come and talk about this news. Is Lo Ta-yu pathetic? Is he pathetic? Switzerland has no cities? That's the stupidity of Chung T'ien. Switzerland has no cities? Wait, then what is Geneva? What is Zurich? What is Bonn? What is Bath? I could literally die laughing, die laughing. So the Kuomintang people who came in 1945 to oppose Taiwanese human rights—look at both sides here. Lo Ta-yu is just a piece of trash, yeah, indeed. Jay Chou, Mayday—Jay Chou and Mayday's music is much better to listen to than Lo Ta-yu's, but that's not my cup of tea either. Not a cup of tea. Mayday is okay, Jay Chou is still okay, and they have indeed made a great contribution to the development of Taiwanese music, that cannot be denied. But you know, they are also old-timers, those people are all old-timers. Jay Chou was very popular more than twenty years ago, and so was Mayday. Now the world has changed, and music has changed too. I still encourage everyone to listen to some young creators, like Collage—there are many, I like heavy metal, Taiwanese rock is also great. Those singers from the past, yes, they have their contributions, but I don't see them going on that UFO radio station to comment on politics. They don't talk about what they don't understand.

And look at Ashin from Mayday, didn't he say that Chinese people should eat Peking duck when they go to Beijing, and then he got blasted by Taiwanese people? He got roasted, and then he didn't dare to speak. But you know, artists are never material for commenting on politics, even abroad. Even abroad, Lady Gaga's music is great, but every time she talks about politics, it's very... it has no analytical value. She is a die-hard believer in the Democratic Party, she supports all the Democratic Party's policies, and she hates Trump, she hates Trump to the bone. But you listen to Lady Gaga, you listen to Lady Gaga's songs, not Lady Gaga analyzing politics for you there. If you go to support a certain party because of the political stance of Lady Gaga, Lo Ta-yu, or Jay Chou, then you are also stupid. Artists cannot be a standard; your thoughts should be formed by yourself. To form thoughts, you should listen to analysts, read news in newspapers and magazines, and listen to evaluations from professionals, not someone playing three chords and saying he understands politics. No, you only understand those three chords, or four chords—in his era, it should have been three chords. Let's go to that... oh, you foreigner, anyhow, May 1970, what qualifications do you have? We are talking nonsense. I specifically use this tone because you should be talking like this. You know what kind of person Lo Ta-yu is. I really think you people are pathetic because you think that by knowing a few Taiwanese, you know the real history of Taiwan. How ridiculous. What contribution has Lo Ta-yu made to Taiwan's history? He is just an artist. I know many people who have struggled for Taiwan's history and have truly promoted Taiwan's democratization and its visibility on the international stage.

Okay, let me tell you about Taiwan's history. I'll teach you Taiwan's history. Americans should get to know Elder Wang Neng-hsiang. He is a very great Taiwanese. He is an accountant, and he was one of the key promoters of the Taiwan Relations Act. At that time, he met with various congressmen and senators individually, arguing that the US should provide guarantees for Taiwan's security. He is now in his nineties and is still in Washington D.C. He moved to Washington to work just to promote this. This person has made a huge contribution to Taiwan, to Taiwan's visibility, and to Taiwan's security. I believe you don't know who this person is, but you know Lo Ta-yu, playing three chords, and that's it. You know? And what qualifications do you have? What qualifications do I have? I am Taiwanese, I am Taiwanese, I have Taiwanese family, I have lived in Taiwan for half my life, and most simply, even if I weren't, you know, I have freedom of speech. That is my qualification. I can comment. Lo Ta-yu can go to a pro-CCP radio station to talk nonsense, scold Taiwanese women, scold the Taiwanese government, belittle Taiwan, praise the CCP, and talk about a bunch of conspiracy theories—like Taiwan's elections are backed by the US, the KMT is backed by the CCP—even your Zhao Shaokang has witnessed this. And then talk about how Mainlanders are discriminated against? The group that has been bullying Taiwanese people all along is now being called discriminated against by you? Are you crazy? You know? Then can I scold him too? Freedom of speech is like this. What contribution has Lo Ta-yu made to Taiwan? Zero.

What godfather, good god, who are you trying to make laugh to death? Who are you trying to make laugh to death? Outdated for thirty or forty years, singing a few pop songs like that, and you still call yourself a godfather, calling yourself a cultured person. Do you want to review this, Madam? You can take that microphone to help quench your thirst. Our Madam, and another person from Taiwan, came over, and a Taiwanese person's review is just laughable to death. Everyone knows that the music of their era just wasn't good-hearing, and then a lot of things required special connections for you to become famous. And right, that guitar—please, modern youth, let alone youth, there are plenty of people who can play the guitar better than him. He just knows how to play a few notes and then sings not very well over there, and that tune is something anyone can casually write nowadays, everyone can write one casually. And then he says he is a cultured person, really, people need to be humble. And I'll tell everyone, on the program he kept cursing that song "Glass Balls", I must say—although I must admit I don't like the song "Glass Balls", nor do I think this girl is particularly amazing—but if we're going to compare, a lot of things are relative. This girl's musical attainment, her everything, is much more formidable than the so-called cultured person Luo Dayou claims to be. Really, don't think too highly of yourself, really. Outdated is outdated; don't think you can still come and ride the coattails of this, you know, riding political issues, and then belittling others, making yourself out to be so formidable, and not humble at all, right? And it's all just things you came up with yourself, you don't have anything—to put it bluntly, this person has no substance. He just relies on the fact that people of his generation might still have some respect for him, and so goes around spreading rumors and saying things. I think he said something, didn't he also say beside Tang Xianglong that someone didn't have children? Right, right, thinking of others? Please, you should also understand, nowadays there are many people who don't have children, but this matter has nothing to do with whether one has children. Tang Xianglong has children, but from childhood to adulthood, his sole focus has been to send his children to the United States, to the great motherland America, right? But other people in Taiwan whom he considers leeks want to reunite with China. He says in his lifetime he wants to see reunification with China. What is this called, thinking of whose interests? You are selling out other people's children while thinking of your own children—do we want this kind of person? Under the sunshine of Arizona, you're fine watching Taiwanese people being sent into concentration camps, Tang Xianglong. Yes, I think this is truly too shameless, such a shameless mug, and it is livingly and clearly displayed across major media outlets. In fact, it also shows that fake-spy radio station, you know, that's called a fake spy, actually it should be renamed a fake spy station. And this fake spy radio station, you know, comments on politics, so they have no guests, they don't have any valuable people to invite, so they invited a Luo Dayou. One second conspiracy theories, the next second who doesn't have children, and the next second over there dropping profanities and cursing. What does he understand about politics? What does he understand about true analysis? Who is he? When did he become a political leader who can go on a broadcast radio station? And also, before calling yourself a cultured person, you should weigh yourself. Internationally, what are your so-called musical contributions internationally over the past few decades? You just say the part you think is most formidable—how deep is your musical attainment? How much contribution have you made to this world? How many awards have you won internationally? None? Then, ah, it is truly too shameful, I can only say that. You should just get down quickly. I see that other much more famous people who have more contributions are all very humble, everyone is very humble, and nobody says "I am a cultured person", you know? This is a straw man, because it was a fake issue to begin with; nobody would say "I am a cultured person", it's Luo Dayou and his crowd who keep saying they are cultured persons. You are even less of one, you know.

And truly speaking, mentioning "Glass Balls", Yang Shuya—she was scolded by me because I think this really won't do, it doesn't sound good. But how is she? She writes poems more reasonably than you, Luo Dayou, and the complexity is also higher. She sings rap better than you sing rap, and she writes music better than Luo Dayou too. Let's call it like it is, right? I don't like her politics, you know, I don't agree with her feminist stuff, but she has ten thousand times, seventy thousand times more talent than you. I know, I feel Yang Shuya should write a song to talk back to him, oh this, I would become a fan of Yang Shuya, this way she can win my respect. Right, right, right, right, okay, I would support it, our channel would promote such a song. Yeah, seeing this, good god, this is failing to act with the dignity expected of an elder—just failing to act with the dignity expected of an elder, and I just find it hilarious. Now everyone is arguing about this stuff; I didn't even want to talk about it originally, because what is Luo Dayou? Today let's chat about Huang Jen-hsun's affair—what place is he actually ranked at, like number five or number six? Huang Jen-hsun's stuff, I'll talk about it later. Actually, I don't care if he has a junior thousand or a junior million, but once those mistresses include a communist spy, that's the problem. The focus is not his affair, but who he is having an affair with. Having an affair is a matter of private morality, but sleeping with a fake spy is a matter of national security level—this we must distinguish very clearly.

Angel Royce8099, thank you so much for your support. The young ACDC and Metallica—I really like ACDC's Angus Young; he loves his wife very much, she's Australian, and his music sounds great. I also love Metallica; Metallica is a great band, a memory from my childhood, and their new music is pretty good too. But you know what? Luo Dayou—let me give you an example, let me give you a true case of a cultured person, because you probably know nothing about the outside world; I see you only watch those Chinese propaganda parts. There is an American musician, a female singer, who is also an extremely fantastic creator. I've written—nowadays many people have heard so many great songs by her, like—well, this isn't a Whitney Houston song, this is Dolly Parton. She passed away last month—well, the month before last, around this period. I love Dolly Parton so much; I love her music to death, to death. Many great songs on the market today, up until now, still use songs written by Dolly Parton. A cultural treasure of the world, from country music to pop music, she never said she wanted to—you know what? In the past, because the American media leaned more toward the Democratic Party, being the mainstream media, they kept asking Dolly Parton, "Do you want to criticize Trump?" She never criticizes any political figures; she believes that creation itself is the most important thing. An extremely modest, extremely modest person, from when she was young until she was quite old, she never claimed to be an intellectual. She is amazing, and all along she has simply considered herself an American country music singer, and she loves her fans. If you were Luo Dayou, if you had 1% of Dolly Parton, you know what? I'm telling you, if you had 10% of the diligence of a Korean pop group, you might become famous perhaps. And if you had—you know what? If you had 1% of Dolly Parton's grace, you wouldn't be so disliked, you wouldn't annoy others so much, and you wouldn't seem so pathetic. I believe my—my followers should have—all listen to Dolly Parton. Eric Clapton is not bad; I really like his album Riding with the King with B.B. King. Her name is Dolly Parton.

Some people say Luo Dayou even sang "Wounds of History," and back then he even spoke out for June Fourth, you know? Speaking out for June Fourth—Jackie Chan was also among them back then; those people seemed to have a moral sense. But now they've become—you know, credit where credit is due. Speaking out for the victims of June Fourth makes you awesome; this should be a moral sense, and you ought to do this thing. If you now go on to obliterate the Taiwanese people, and if you now go on to speak for China, which wants to invade Taiwan, then you are truly pathetic, then you are truly pathetic. Therefore, the Jackie Chan of 1989 is the Jackie Chan I respect; the Jackie Chan of today is the Jackie Chan I look down upon. Credit where credit is due, people can be bought, people can be bought. How about the Queen? I really dislike their politics, but their music is good. In "Wounds of History," half of the singers left blanks, right? Oh, you can answer my Super Chat—let me see. Wait a moment, do you have a Super Chat? I can only see Angel Royce8099 here for Super Chats, no—and then another live stream had Black Keys. Is this Raymond4052 yours? Stan, what do you think of Marco Rubio? I greatly admire him, and I've even had indirect contact with him because I previously wrote, wrote a letter to his office and they replied. He is also seen as part of the traditional establishment within the Republican Party, harboring a strong aversion and hostility toward communism, and his attitude toward China is even tougher than Trump's. He still carries the shadow of Reagan; if he really gets elected, is it possible for him to become a second Reagan? I agree with many of your points, but I don't think we can say he is more anti-communist than Trump, because Trump hired him as Secretary of State, yet Trump also heavily relies on him, and he handles many things very effectively. Because he is from Florida, he is of Cuban descent, and also has very strong backing. I hope he gets elected, I hope he becomes the next US President. He is a person with a very strong sense of morality, and someone who maintains a great respect for the founding spirit of the United States, as well as being willing to promote and uphold this American spirit internationally and domestically. I like him very much; he is arguably my most favorite political figure in the Republican Party, bar none. The second one should be Ron DeSantis, also from that Florida side. As for the next presidential election, I think the Republican Party can only put forward Marco Rubio. JD Vance cannot pull in a bunch of votes; I had great hope for him when he first became Vice President, but I see many things he still hasn't been able to deliver on. However, there are still two years left, so I like Rubio, and I also hope he becomes the next US President.

Guns N' Roses, what are you all writing about? That music group, they are a good band, they are, but let me tell you, when I was a kid, I preferred this kind of heavy metal, pure heavy metal, like Metallica, or Iron Maiden. I also quite like Ozzy Osbourne, and Pantera. I also really like the musical aspect of Korn. Later on, I listened to a lot of Metalcore too, from Bring Me the Horizon to As I Lay Dying, those are the classics. I think my favorite would probably be Metallica and that generation, the 80s, you know. Dokken is not bad either, and Iron Maiden. That era had a lot of classic music. There's also the German band Blind Guardian; their vocals are very high, they hit those high notes amazingly. And Anthrax, Slayer, yeah, I like that heavier kind of music. As for blues and jazz, I listen to those too, and classical music. Actually, apart from hip-hop, I listen to everything. I really don't like hip-hop. Other than hip-hop, I pretty much listen to everything, from gospel to heavy metal, I love them all. But it's fine now, I think I'm quite happy that hip-hop is finally going out of style. I also quite like movies. Hip-hop is finally going out of style, so I really can't help but be happy about it. Jon Bon Jovi, it seems he's still writing music, which is great.

I agree with your thoughts, Rubio is a good candidate, he has a conscience, he is one of the consciences of the Republican Party. I don't think Vance has that capability right now, and I think Vance's problem is that he is too close to the tech industry. You see, Trump is too close to the US tech industry, which also led to the problems in this midterm election. When he was campaigning, many promises could not be fulfilled, and that was also caused by him taking excessive care of those tech giants. I agree that the US cannot lose the AI race, but you have to maintain a balance. You can't just treat promises to voters as mere references, you know? You still have to fulfill them, you have to figure out how to find a balance point, otherwise, in a democracy, you won't get elected. But Jensen Huang is also very opposed to the hawks on China. Yeah, Jensen Huang once even said that being a hawk on China is a badge of shame, you know, not a badge of honor. I think it is a badge of honor, not a badge of shame.

Am I not plugged in? One of my lights, one of my lights, let me turn it off first, I still have another light. I've been traveling abroad quite often lately, so some cables are brought along, some are quite ideal. Wait for me a second, my little tripod. I've been really busy lately, so a lot of things are just... but it's okay, I think it's fine to be a bit more relaxed during the livestream, it's not bad. Just chatting while doing things, it's actually quite good. I recently got one of those that can show if there's a guitar shop—not a guitar shop, it's the one that shows if it's charging, and how many watts it is? Is it watts? It's watts, you know? Jim Kool, Hello, Howdy.

Vance doesn't show much great value, nor does he have creative remarks, but his story is quite moving. Vance's story is very moving, and Americans really buy into this part of the story. You can go check him out. Yes, I read his second book, it's not as good as the first one. It's not common for a Secretary of State to become President, but Rubio has a chance. Besides Trump, he also has the endorsement of the Bush family. Let me tell you, because Rubio was originally a Senator, and it's actually quite common for a Senator to become President, so besides the Secretary of State position, he also has a background as a Senator. So he... because you know, I remember I really liked Pompeo, but at that time many Taiwanese said Pompeo would become President, Pompeo would become President, and then I said, look at his polls. It means that just because he is famous in Taiwan doesn't mean Americans know who Pompeo is. You have to understand, because generally speaking, the Secretary of State is the one who gets the least attention within the US team. But Rubio is different, Rubio was already very famous, and Rubio—because there are really too many international affairs in Trump 2.0, and it is often reported in the US—so Rubio has a chance, Rubio has a very good chance.

The United States will fix this now because the Democrats are all an alliance under the communists. I am quite looking forward to some of the Democratic establishment rising up to oppose those DSA folks, yes. Now, do you like Marilyn Manson? I like him, and Rob Zombie too, a similar kind of style. Marilyn Manson is pretty good, his new stuff is also quite nice to listen to, like The Mephistopheles of Los Angeles, though that's also stuff from over ten years ago, but it's good, pretty good. Okay, let's look at everyone's comments again, first doing the live stream. So is there a live stream tomorrow? No tomorrow, I have to be busy tomorrow, so I am doing that makeup class today, making up for the workday, so the live stream is today, tomorrow probably won't have time, so I am just preventively doing the live stream today first.

Then let's talk about the part regarding Jensen Huang. I currently feel that the most awkward person should be Chiang Wan-an. Let's bring the topic to Taiwan, and then isn't Jensen Huang and the rest being photographed in Taiwan during many of those very classic scenes, and Chiang Wan-an even treats this thing as a political achievement, I find this thing quite interesting. Let me ask everyone, do you think, do you think this Jensen Huang matter will be unfavorable to Chiang Wan-an's election campaign? I think it will, I think it will. You ask about the Democrats like AOC and Sanders? Very terrible, they will destroy the Democrats, I mean those Bernie and that AOC, and also Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, those new-generation far-left extremists are all terrifying. Mamdani is very terrible, this is a communist. You know what kind of Democrats I like? I like the veteran ones like Nancy Pelosi, or their senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin is also pretty good, and also, that is, compared to Gabe Amo, that congressman, a black guy, he is also pretty good, he's from Rhode Island, it's relatively, you know, still will support a market economy, you know, I am not about resource redistribution, those who are willing to join the Taiwan Caucus, yes, just like this.

Rubio, DeSantis, not Vance. You say DeSantis as Rubio's vice president? DeSantis feels like he also really wants to run for president, but I think both he and Rubio are good, they are both good candidates, these are the two I admire the most in the Republican Party. Now for this Jensen Huang part, regarding that cheating issue, it was originally said, I was just saying there are some very big risks regarding national security. At that time, Taiwan's talk show pundit Wang Chieh-ming also said, Wang Hung-wei doesn't read books, what is she so great, how much stuff has she brought to Taiwan. Now I feel, then Wang Chieh-ming, do you want to apologize now? It's pundits who don't read books, I feel you are more like it. Regarding that Jensen Huang matter, I want to ask Huang, did your wife leave you during your lowest point, and why are you so, so like betraying her? Yes, it's rotten, I think this behavior is really very terrible, and I know his wife is named Lori, she has always been very loyal to him, and when he was still a nobody, she was willing to stay with him, and now it turns out like this, very bad.

People who haven't left Taiwan long enough won't understand Taiwan's controversies. Who are you talking about? I feel many people who already have votes haven't lived in Taiwan longer than I have. Are you talking about me? Are you talking about me? Okay. I think we can talk more about Jensen Huang, but I need to go to the restroom first, and then we will continue, please wait for me for just a moment, okay?

OK, I'm back, I'm back. By the way, the song I just played for you guys, which is that Be Right Back, the song for coming right back, and the chords are more complex than any song by Lo Ta-yu, and this wasn't even written by myself, so now what do I have to say, I wouldn't know anyway, you know, some simple concepts of jazz music doesn't mean one is anything. I came so late today because there was a thing that made me lose energy, which is that I just gatecrashed Guan Chang's live stream today and had a debate with him. Oh, interesting, interesting.

Stan, do you think Jensen Huang is a matter that might spark a McCarthyism-style anti-China wave in the United States? Back in the McCarthy era, the scientific community was also purged of quite a few people. I'll say something very politically incorrect, I think the United States needs McCarthyism, and Taiwan needs it too, needs McCarthyism, not anti-China or anti-communism, but anyone who has cooperation and dealings with authoritarian countries should be checked, should be investigated. Because you know what? Recently in the United States there are also a lot, from biology to physics and chemistry, to engineering in various fields, there is a bunch of spies, and they are real. McCarthy at that time, Senator McCarthy, was called McCarthyism, and the list he proposed back then, upon later investigation, most of the people were indeed related to the communist party, so the purges done back then were necessary. But because relatively left-leaning people are in power now, everyone is too afraid of being labeled with McCarthyism, but that doesn't mean what McCarthy did back then was wrong, nor does it mean McCarthy's proposed investigations and lists related to such infiltration were unnecessary. They were necessary, I think the United States needs to be more McCarthyist, and Taiwan too. McCarthy was smeared with too many things, yes.

So when it comes to McCarthyism, I find it quite repulsive. I believe that when you oppose communism and Communist infiltration, you shouldn't tie it to racial issues. We should look at race separately; your race does not determine what kind of person you are. But who you deal with and cooperate with in terms of government is a different matter. Take Jensen Huang, for example—to speak in more detail, Jensen Huang has mistresses. Back then, when I criticized those Taiwanese politicians who cheated, I said that cheating is a matter of personal morality. But you know what? You couldn't find a Taiwanese mistress; you couldn't find a mistress who wasn't Chinese. That is an even bigger problem. It's the same with Jensen Huang: his personal morality is a matter of personal morality. As the boss and CEO of such a huge enterprise, he should also understand, and he should know whether the entities he cooperates and deals with are working with governments that pose a national security risk to the United States. This is also required by US law; US law demands it. He must have known about this, and he must have been very clear about what kind of background Huang Le has. Because if you look at Megaspeed, even the company name sounds like just a shell company. But you know what? It has a Communist exterior, a Singaporean company exterior, but inside it's actually tied to the Communists. He probably knew everything, but the money was just too tempting, so he had to—well, not that he had to, he could have chosen not to. He could have chosen not to, just like I mentioned in my short video before, where the Broadcom CEO was offering up his dick to Huawei for orders. Maybe he really thinks that way, and I don't think that's an exaggeration at all. These rich people often view things this way when dealing with the CCP. And people push the blame onto Huang Le, saying Huang Le was just his scapegoat. Let me tell you, you're right. Huang Le was just a smokescreen. Just how much has he actually dealt with the CCP side? And then Trump even took him to meet Xi Jinping. I think we will see a lot more of this ahead; we will see even more terrifying things. Look, as soon as the Huang Le incident was reported, Jensen Huang directly resigned from NVIDIA, stepping down immediately. Because I think it's not just because of Huang Le; he must also be afraid that more things would be dug up and exposed.

So let's go back to how everyone used to curse Bannon. I think Bannon was spot-on in his assessment of Jensen Huang, calling him a national security loophole. This person is a national security loophole. Yet there is a group of foolish people in Taiwan who treat him like a treasure just because he was born in Tainan. Don't do that, don't do that. He merely treats Taiwan as a tool, as a facade. You know, many descendants of mainlanders in the US love to call themselves Taiwanese. There is a guy in California named Ted Liu. When it's convenient, he's Chinese; when it's inconvenient, he's Taiwanese—just like Jensen Huang. Sometimes Jensen Huang is Chinese and American-Chinese, and then he acts heroic in Taiwan. As for this Ted Liu, he says he's Taiwanese. I've told you his story before: he has a mainland background, and his family only stayed in Taiwan for ten years, fleeing there with the Kuomintang, staying for 11 years just passing through, and then moving straight to the US. Many so-called Taiwanese-Americans in US politics have this kind of family background. In the past, they would all call themselves Chinese, but now they find that being Chinese—well, being associated with the Communists is a bit exaggerated and a bit scary, so they don't want to wear the label of Chinese anymore, and they turn into Taiwanese. They are chameleons, truly. They have no emotional attachment to Taiwan, and I don't think they have any contribution to Taiwan either. Jensen Huang, he's just—well, since he's American, I don't think his nationality is the main point; he's a very selfish person who only cares about himself. That's why the Badge of Honor and Badge of Shame come from this. He's a terrible person with personal problems, and I think this is just the tip of the iceberg; we'll see more things in the future.

Now, returning to whether that friend's point will spark McCarthyism: I hope there is McCarthyism. I hope these tech giants dealing with China every day, constantly running off to China, constantly trying to sell things to China, and—like Jensen Huang—even lobbying to sell high-end chips to China... doesn't Jensen Huang know that NVIDIA's chips helped the CCP build DeepSeek? DeepSeek is completely stolen; its simulation is a simulation, its tech is ChatGPT's, it's OpenAI's technology, and the chips are delivered by—well, it's two American companies. Two American companies empowered America's enemy. So I hope for a bit more McCarthyism, for more thorough investigations. People are too naive right now, too naive and irresponsible to American voters. We need a bit more McCarthyism.

And I think it's precisely because the left is in power that everyone is afraid—afraid of issues like discrimination. Yes, we shouldn't discriminate against people, that's true, but you also have to look after your national security; you still have to protect yourself, you know? Because they're afraid of being labeled as discriminatory, they don't investigate NVIDIA. The training data is all copied from American AI; it's copied from OpenAI. Because they went over there to scrape it, they saw that the data was all from OpenAI. The CCP really shouldn't push refugees over here. That is to say, if Taiwan is China's, and Taipei answers 'D' or the CCP—well, let me ask everyone this. I'll ask everyone: do you think this Jensen Huang case will affect the election in Taiwan? I think it will. If you think so, please press 1; if not, please press 0. The Trump team has also warned that lies are useless.

Hi, Stan, Thank you for highlighting the importance of conservatives in the United States for the public in Taiwan. We do need to learn more about that in order to protect Taiwan. Well, Yeah, I think. The issue is that. Not too many conservative media outlets are present in Taiwan. Right. Taiwanese are not exposed to the more conservative side of the political spectrum, not only in the United States, but also in the UK, in Poland, in all the countries around the world, and I think that Taiwan should be more engaged with that audience as well, because they account for at least one half of the population in the US, or in the UK, not everyone is liberal, not everyone watching CNN, or MSNBC, or BBC, so it's important to cover it more broadly. And I think we are one of the few conservative leaning outlets. I don't consider myself a hardcore conservative, but I am a reasonable conservative, in my opinion. Thank you, thank you for your comment. Thank you, thank you for your comment.

0, oh, some people think it won't. Okay, 1, 1, 1. Then I'll see you on the other side. I'll see you on the other side. Because I'm on the show. I'll see you on the other side. I'll see you on the other side. Wait a moment. Wait a moment. Hmm, where? Is this vertical? Is this horizontal? I need to start another vertical one. Okay. OK, good night, good night, good night. Thank you, thank you, thank you for watching our live stream today. We are almost finished; tomorrow is a big day, I have a lot of things to do.

Yes, I should engage more in international affairs. Well, absolutely. You have to, you have to, you must. That is why I am also very seriously promoting Taiwan's participation in CPAC this time, whether that CPAC is in Poland or in the United States. Such conservative initiatives, because you don't necessarily have to speak, but you can listen to what others are saying. And I also strongly suggest that Taiwanese people, you know, when you go to the United States, we can see what we can see, what we can do. I suggest that on Sunday, you can go to church, listen to what the priest or pastor has to say, listen to what different groups are saying. The most direct way for you to have contact with Americans is to go to church with them, and you can understand their biggest worries; it is very direct.

And you also understand CPAC, what issues the American conservatives are concerned about and worried about now, so you must talk, you must talk. I personally feel that I am a conservative, but I am a moderate conservative. I think there can be a consensus with progressives on many issues, especially those related to diplomacy and national security. I won't be like some people who think the Democratic Party is all terrible, the Democratic Party is all terrible, but I think they can still communicate, they still have OK people, so we still need to find a bipartisan consensus, in the United States as well, in Poland as well, everywhere.

Going to church is good, you must go to church, definitely. And see if there are any activities, that is, the kind of community, the things their different groups, different neighborhoods are organizing, you must go. I know Taiwanese people like to go to schools, but schools do not represent the entire American society, and it is best to go to different churches. I also highly recommend going to Black churches; they are also very enthusiastic and will welcome you, and their music is very good, that Gospel, that is fantastic. And you can also understand what their worries are. It is not like what CNN reports there. You need to understand society, you need to integrate into the environment, and religion is a very key part of American life.

Thank you, Xie Xiaozhen, for your donation, thank you for your donation. It is also considered a good religion, yes, religion must be good. I even tell you that you should also go to mosques, go understand, go see. Every time I go to a Muslim country, or Turkey, or Kazakhstan, I also go to mosques to see, and see what the situation is inside, how the people inside are, and if I can talk to the, what is it called, Imam there, I will also chat a bit, just to see how they are, because you need to understand people's lives. Many people are afraid of religious activities, afraid of churches, afraid of those religious rituals, don't be, these are good things. These religions all teach you to do good deeds, so that is how many misunderstandings can be resolved.

The founding spirit of the United States lies in Christianity, indeed, indeed, One nation under God, right? One nation under God. There are foreign media reports that it is for national security, that it is a bipartisan backlash against the anti-China faction. Some are bipartisan, but I am afraid that after this election, this bipartisan spirit will disappear, because too many radical leftists have been elected, that is, DSA, that is, socialists, socialists being elected, this is a bad thing for the United States, you know? What is the healthiest thing for the United States? It is that the Republican Party is traditionally conservative, and the Democratic Party is a market economy in terms of economics, and on these social issues, it is slightly more tolerant. This is a normal situation in the United States. Now the Democratic Party has accepted too much anti-American propaganda and people who are anti-American to participate in this politics, that is what I am worried about. Is Poland mainly Christian, Catholic? We Catholics also believe in Christ, also believe in Jesus Christ, so Xi Jinping opposes Christianity, he also opposes Islam, he is opposing any religion. So my thesis also wrote about the part of the Sinicization of religion. Although my friends are all against McCarthyism, my friends say McCarthyism is over-anxious, but if you are not nervous now, it will be too late, your country will be gone, your security will be gone. Over-anxious? There is no over-anxiety, now is the time to be nervous, now is the time of excessive relaxation, you know, some things cannot be bumped out. Xi Jinping's that, I think they won't be that fast, Xi Jinping will still give us a headache for a while.

Right, so those are roughly the things I wanted to talk about in today's livestream. We chatted about Jensen Huang and Luo Dayu. Hey, dear, are you busy? Do you have anything you want to share with the fans? We discussed Luo Dayu and Jensen Huang today; do you think there's anything else worth sharing and talking about? I don't know if it's the Democrats or someone else trying to mess with him. Let me tell you everyone, I don't care. First of all, because he is indeed someone who has direct dealings with Chinese people and the Chinese Communist Party—very close dealings—and he has even admitted to having an extramarital affair, he admitted it, right? So basically, I just feel that we should wait until the results come out before saying what he's really like. But before that, his past words and actions have always been quite pro-CCP, and even—has anyone noticed some of the trends on the internet and how all the Simplified Chinese comments are speaking up for Jensen Huang? This makes me feel very uncomfortable. So I want to remind my friends in Taiwan that right now we are just observing, observing what the investigation results are, and not excessively rushing to speak up for Jensen Huang.

Because if—if he didn't sell data, that would of course be great, thank God. But if he did, if he sold these high-tech things, whether by accident or on purpose, through Huang Le's Singaporean company to China, then that would be a huge slap in the face to the people of Taiwan, especially regarding the relationship between Taiwan and the people of the United States. It is a major slap in the face, because first, the AI computing power you sold out ends up coming back to attack the Taiwan Strait and Taiwan, and second, it's also infiltrating U.S. national security. This is a severe slap in the face. So first of all, I want to condemn him, because he's also the one who kept lobbying Trump to let chips—lower-tier computing power—be sold to China. Personally, I think none of them should be sold. And some people say, "If you don't sell them, they'll just make their own chips." If they had the ability, they would have built them long ago, right? So on this issue, I am not backing Jensen Huang, and I want to see what the investigation results are before saying anything else. Everyone should remember this too; don't follow all kinds of online trends and narratives like racial theories, claiming that ethnic Chinese are being marginalized, or conspiracy theories—no conspiracy theories—or that Jensen Huang was taken down by internal power struggles. I don't care about any of that; I only care about what the real investigation results are. Until then, I believe no one. That's it.

I expect Wang Jieming to have a breakdown. Never mind, those talking heads don't read books anyway. He bought a ton of Jensen Huang's stock, so he must be losing a fortune. He's losing so badly this time that he won't dare to come out and shoot his mouth off recently, saying how much water he called in. Paying taxes is an obligation, right? Yeah, if there weren't a rule requiring you to pay taxes, would you pay? With so much money, would you pay? Makes me laugh. There are also a small number of different Chinese people. I am a Chinese person who has read Edmund Burke. You're awesome! You have a really good grasp of the spirit of America's founding and conservatism. Edmund Burke is not bad; he's a very impressive figure. Yeah, I know many like that. The one who came with me to Colin last time also named himself Edmond Burke, and we chatted about some concepts of conservatism; not bad at all. Many Chinese people have ideas, and there are many well-read people in China too, but you know what? Among 1.4 billion people, there are definitely geniuses, and quite a few of them. But there are also fools, bastards, and terrorists, so you have all kinds of people. When a country is huge, a tree with large branches is bound to have withered twigs, and when there are many people, you're bound to get a Xi Jinping. In this era, racism in the true sense no longer exists. This is Mr. Colman Martin Z—well, I wouldn't dare say it so absolutely; it still exists. But because these problems exist, there is also the judiciary and related regulations. Do people discriminate? Look at how outrageously Jews are being discriminated against right now, so it actually needs to be eliminated. But national security has nothing to do with discrimination, yet the Winnie supporters in this country are not a small minority, which is terrifying. Many countries are like that, unfortunately.

Don't Iran have many geniuses? They do too. Our bastard government—AI is a weapon indeed. AI is a weapon; AI is acting as a weapon right now. Look at drone warfare, isn't it all controlled by AI? AI is already a weapon. With so many people, you're bound to have some. Okay, right, that's about it. I have to get busy; there's still a lot of stuff I haven't finished yet. It was great chatting with everyone today. Let's keep working hard for Taiwan, keep it up, and please watch more of my one-on-one interviews done at CPAC. There are many amazing congressmen. My next one is a very young Ukrainian guy who talks about a lot of things, and the former British Conservative Party whip—he's now a British MP—this Duncan Smith. I highly recommend everyone to watch it; you must watch it. Alright, then we'll leave it at that for now. Thanks everyone, see you in the next episode.