After the Fifth Plenary Session, the White Terror is in progress.
Zhai Shanying analyzed in his program the negative impact of Trump's showy wealth behavior during the US midterm elections on the election prospects in red states, and discussed the reality of a comprehensive collapse within China, including plunging box office revenues and continuously declining marriage rates. He focused on analyzing the eight decisions deliberated and passed at the Fifth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee, pointing out that measures such as comprehensively implementing severe "white terror" within the party, restricting the power of top leaders, implementing whole-cycle supervision, and breaking the "iron-capped princes" indicate an intensifying crisis for the CCP regime.
Video Link:
Full Text:
Um, alright, friends, hello everyone. Although it's a bit late, we're still on, ah. Friends, hello everyone! Today is Friday, November 6, 2026. Welcome everyone to Zhai Shanying's YouTube channel, ah, to chat and relax. For friends in China to help you sleep, for friends overseas to keep your minds clear, ah. Let me turn this off. Alright, everyone is number one! It's the weekend again, ah! Now there are just over fifty days left until 2027, ah. The time that has passed in 2026 has definitely become the most unforgettable year in the lives of many of our Chinese people, ah! Especially those who have not experienced the Cultural Revolution. Uh, to be precise, we can say everyone born after 1975, ah. Actually, people born after 1975 didn't really feel it either, since it ended in 1976. Ah, even if I count from then, this year should be the most unforgettable one for everyone alive today, because in 2026, the Chinese Communist Party led by that fucking idiot Xi Jinping created hundreds of historical records in this country called China, both domestically and within the party, and many of them are even world records, ah. And none of these records are good; the birth of every single record indicates that yet another nightmare has been added for the Chinese people, ah. Therefore, today we still have to talk, ah, we still have to analyze these nightmares, ah. Through these nightmares, while watching these perverse acts of the CCP, ah, let us also make our own lives more valuable through the things summarized here, ah.
Ah, talking about the Republican Party, ah, we can certainly start by casually chatting about the topic of the US congressional midterm elections, since it is after all the biggest hot topic in the entire world. To completely not talk about it would be a bit inappropriate, ah. However, for this topic, ah, this topic is already being talked about by many, many people on the internet. Personally, I feel that many people have analyzed it quite well, quite objectively, ah. So I myself feel that, uh, if you want to listen to a particularly comprehensive take on this topic, uh, you can go online and listen to more content from various hosts, alright? Ah, I won't talk about the comprehensive aspects of this topic as a whole, and what I talk about is also hard to be very objective, just like the label of my channel: the prophet and witness of the CCP's collapse. Therefore, my views on the situation in the United States, especially my evaluation of Trump, ah, are all from my personal perspective and are never in a state of fairness and impartiality. After all, in my feeling, the United States is a country very, very far away from me. Whether the lives and survival of the American people are good or bad has very little to do with the purpose of what I am trying to do, so my evaluations of Trump, the US Republican Party, and the Democratic Party are all based on the core of how the words and deeds of these individuals and parties relate to the interests of the Chinese nation.
Ah, for example, before Trump took office, he tried hard to help Russia, and after taking office, he eliminated a large number of anti-communist tools and aid to anti-communist teams, such as Voice of America. In my eyes, these words and actions of Trump were accomplices to the rogue party, the Chinese Communist Party, continuing to enslave the Chinese people, so they had to be fought against. Therefore, at that time, I was a firm opponent of Trump. By 2026, Trump began to heavily satirize and mock the CCP, and started a war with Iran. At that point, I felt that Trump's words and actions were things that hit the CCP. So those words and actions of Trump were in the direction I supported. Although I judged myself that after Trump leaves office, there is a very high probability that he might go to jail, and being heavily prosecuted is inevitable, with a high probability of going to jail. But whether what this person did to the American people was good or bad, you have your own evaluations in your hearts. Ah, my current support for his words and actions is determined by my own stance; where you sit dictates what you think, meaning where my stance is and where the direction of my seat is represents where my opinion leans. Ah, so when everyone listens to this US congressional election truly objectively, comprehensively, and fairly, you don't need to listen to me, okay? You don't need to listen to me. Ah, so in my evaluation of Trump, ah, you don't need to try to find some kind of fairness either. Ah, my own values are just to help Trump—as long as he helps the rogue dictatorial party that is the CCP, ah, then he is bad; if Trump hits the rogue dictatorial party that is the CCP, he is good. Do you understand, everyone? Okay, ah.
Although, to be fair, ah, if you are being fair, ah, Trump starting a war with Iran was indeed a reason that led to the midterm defeat of the Republican Party in this congressional election—a reason for the Republican Party's defeat in the midterm congressional elections. For the American public, this war was a bad thing, driving up domestic oil prices and increasing the cost of living for the people. But for me personally, where you sit dictates what you think, and this belongs to a righteous act of hitting the CCP's allies. So everyone listening to this analysis, listen to the outside world comprehensively, okay? Ah, I cannot speak on it fully, my perspective is not fair, but I can talk about the small, critical points I saw in this matter that almost no one on the internet is mentioning right now, which have reference significance for all of us. I think, ah, a very important reason for the failure of the Republican Party in this US midterm congressional election was something done by the Republican leader, Trump. Ah, this kind of thing will appear as a bug in the lives of many of us. People-oriented, this is what I want to talk about, which is a particularly stupid thing Trump did during this presidential term, regardless of whether he is good or not, and that thing is continuously and loudly engaging in untimely showing off of wealth. Ah, I feel that this is actually a self-destructive act done by Trump as the head of the Republican Party. Ah, the current reality of the United States is that after Trump took office, a large number of people have endured continuously rising prices, continuously falling actual purchasing power, and increasing pressure on living.
As a result, after this President Trump came to power, he has been frantically showing off his personal wealth, luxurious life, and the billionaire circle he owns in all aspects. This kind of behavior will definitely cause a great deal of psychological backlash among a large number of Americans, especially those in red states who have lived at a low standard of living for a long time and have a demand for hope in improving their lives after Trump comes to power. Ah, Trump's behavior will cause them to have extreme resentment and a huge gap in expectations. Ah, I think this is the key to why problems appeared in three red states. Trump's wealth-flaunting is so crazy now, to what extent? Even three days before the voting of this US midterm congressional election, on October 31, 2026, ah, a large amount of polling data clearly showed that the Republican disadvantage was obvious, just three days until voting. Many red states would flip blue, and then Trump was actually still holding a high-profile luxury party at his Mar-a-Lago estate. According to the live photos released by the media, a large number of women wearing exposed clothing or tight-fitting clothes covered in sequins shuttled through the party, with aerial acrobatics, animal performances, bars filled with Alaskan king crab and caviar, and so on. Then Trump, along with many dignitaries and businessmen including the Speaker of the House, revelled together. Trump himself told the media that this was a gathering of members of the billionaire club.
Aren't you fucking asking for hatred by doing this? I feel that this kind of thing done by Trump, and even widely publicized by the media, not only fails to help the Republican Party in the congressional elections, but also belongs to putting the Republican Party on the fire to roast. As the ancestors of Huaxia said, ah, this saying over thousands of years must be remembered: do not worry about scarcity, but worry about inequality; do not worry about poverty, but worry about instability. Right, this is the rule of the Creator; this is the natural law on the earth where we live. The broad masses of the American people live with continuous decline, and as a result, the president is there frantically showing off wealth and revelling, and it is even widely spread through media, ah, this is what I call automatically asking for hatred. And Trump has been doing this all the time since he became president. Hmm, my personal feeling is that Trump might be in a big judgment misunderstanding right now, ah, which is that he thinks the reason why the American people chose a billionaire as president is because they hope the American president can represent the United States to show off his super wealth attributes, and he probably thinks that his wealth-flaunting behavior will make the American people trust him more.
Actually, it is not just the United States, but in the vast majority of countries around the world, as long as there are genuine democratic elections, when voters choose a billionaire as president—and I don't mean choosing a politician who is a billionaire, but a billionaire—a very important reason is the belief that this billionaire knows how to make money. Since they know how to make money, the voters think that after this billionaire becomes president, they will use their money-making skills in managing the entire country and lead everyone to make money together. But this situation certainly doesn't mean only they get rich while we all stay poor. Right? If they keep getting richer and we, who elected them, end up getting poorer, that's insane; it's impossible. And in such a situation, if this billionaire constantly flaunts their wealth to the voters, making the voters admire their riches—ah, I mean, this is truly problematic. Let me say it again: 'Do not worry about scarcity, but worry about inequality; do not worry about poverty, but worry about instability.' This is a rule of the Creator. Human society has lived this way for thousands of years in every corner, right? Let's look at the last hundred years; because democratic countries have been more prominent in the last century, as long as there is flaunting of wealth—where the country's people are not rich, but the president flaunts wealth—for example, former French President Sarkozy and others, once you flaunt wealth, you immediately lose the trust of the people, lose the support of the parliament, lose the support of the public, and eventually step down.
This includes those authoritarian, non-democratic countries—North Korea, Turkey, the Philippines, Iran—many people getting into trouble is also related to flaunting wealth. Right? Former Philippine President Marcos, right? The Pahlavi dynasty in Iran, weren't they all ousted for flaunting wealth? Ah, Turkey's richest man, Erdogan, used to have quite high poll numbers, but he kept flaunting wealth, and his approval rating has been declining. Ah, if he hadn't relied on cheating after becoming a dictator in the recent election, he would have stepped down too. Therefore, in human history, everyone must remember—other things have nothing to do with our lives. Everyone must remember that when the public develops dissatisfaction with the country's economic development, government capability, social stability, and other aspects, and the status quo continues to deteriorate, at this time, the flaunting of wealth by the head of state—even if you are an emperor—will become a major trigger for social unrest and political instability.
Ah, so, although the People's Republic of China is a rogue party and very stupid, on this point, they do something quite interesting. That is, when the public is in hardship and difficulty, their evaluation and attitude toward the leader are not only based on what the leader has done for the country, but also come from the degree to which the leader's own performance is close to the living conditions of the masses. So, this rogue party, you also notice, most of the time, including Mao Zedong, always shows the public that they live in a very simple state. Ah, in any case, they will never flaunt wealth. Ah, on the surface, they must share weal and woe with the public. So why have they been faking this for so long? How the fuck has the CCP survived until now? Look, if they had been flaunting wealth all along, would there be social unrest? Alright, ah, so everyone remember, a reminder, especially for friends in China: the People's Republic of China is experiencing a process of becoming increasingly poor. At this time, there will be a rapidly expanding sense of hatred toward the rich among more and more people in this country.
Moreover, the Chinese Communist Party has conducted brainwashing education, which will increase the spread of mutual harm among the lower classes! The intensity of this spread must be much faster and much more severe than in a democratic country like the United States. Furthermore, the current state of China means that all overseas Chinese—as long as you have Chinese people among your friends—will basically be affected by the economic collapse of the CCP state. Alright, there is no way to avoid being affected, so a reminder: at this time, it is even more important to live a low-key life. Do not learn from Trump. In human society, whether you are running a company, a political party, or a country, ah, 'do not worry about scarcity, but worry about inequality; do not worry about poverty, but worry about instability.' A reminder again: unless you are in a place with strong religious constraints, otherwise, ah, facing widespread poverty and the trend of continuous impoverishment, flaunting wealth here is the same as seeking death, alright, the same behavior. That's all I'll say about US affairs for now, just as an opening. Then, my habit is still to talk about the CCP state's own affairs. Everyone can listen to what others have to say, alright, ah.
As for the state of China, everyone understands that it has always been bad. In 2026, everything is bad! The CCP's exploitation through various exorbitant taxes and levies has reached a very clear point, and all kinds of fields are collapsing. Even if you try to find a place that isn't bad and hasn't collapsed, you can't find one! From the beginning of the year until now, I have been asking the little wumaos and little pinks to help me find one every day. If you find one, let's communicate and exchange here, okay? We communicate and exchange, but we can't find one. The little pinks and little wumaos have tried hard but still can't find one! In this situation, what can the Chinese Communist Party do? It can only desperately stir up trouble and set the narrative. Therefore, in the current CCP state, whether you are in China or seeing all this information, everyone must keep a clear head. I will talk about some current situations and the truth that everyone needs to analyze with logic. For example, the current film industry in the CCP state—this is an industry that is collapsing across the board, falling rapidly. 2026 is the year with the highest record number of movie theater closures in the history of the CCP state. In the first four months, official national data showed that 550 cinemas had closed.
Ah, the national box office for cinema chains is at its lowest record in ten years, and it keeps hitting new lows. The October box office was the lowest in a decade, with only 2.046 billion for the entire month. Then, starting from the 1st of November, every single day has been setting a new historical low. Ah, the official data from the day before yesterday, Wednesday, showed that the total box office revenue for all cinema chains across the country was less than 12 million yuan. If we calculate based on the 2025 official data from the CCP-ruled China, which states there are 14,000 cinemas, the daily operating revenue for each cinema is only 850 yuan, just over eight hundred yuan.
Think about it, a cinema or movie complex with such a large area and multiple screening halls, generating 850 yuan in daily turnover—not profit, but turnover. I estimate that most Didi drivers in China probably make more than this amount in a day of driving, before deductions, right? Over eight hundred yuan. A cinema that big, and it only makes over eight hundred yuan. Last year, in 2025, look at that rate of collapse; the national daily average box office in the CCP-ruled China was still 142 million. Now it is down to 12 million. This year, the first half of the year for cinemas in the CCP-ruled China saw a year-on-year decline of 40.6%, nearly halved—halved in a single year! The total was only 17.354 billion, and the number of moviegoers in the first three quarters dropped by 20,000! Everyone knows the situation: the film industry is collapsing. The Chinese Communist Party has no explanation for this. This is what you call muddying the waters and setting the narrative. It is normal for the Chinese Communist Party to explain it this way. We all understand that this situation is because the economy of the CCP-ruled China is getting worse and worse, and the people are getting poorer and poorer. They have no money, so they can only reduce spending on public social activities like going to the movies. Everyone understands this. But the Chinese Communist Party will definitely not say it that way.
Ah, so saying the Party is bad is a problem? Then why are cinemas failing and the box office so dismal this year? Is it because internet short dramas suddenly became popular and impacted the film market? For example, in May, an editor's note in the CCP's "Economic Information Daily" stated that internet short dramas squeezed consumers' demand for movies, which is the main reason for the current difficulties in the film market of the People's Republic of China.
They blame everything on internet short dramas. Let's use this example, present the facts, and reason it out. Does what the CCP says make sense to you? The idea is that people aren't going to the cinema to watch movies anymore, but are instead watching internet videos at home because short dramas are popular, not because the economy is too bad. If you think that way, you've been foolish once. It will be very easy for the CCP to brainwash you in the future by presenting facts and reasoning. I've told you all before. Think about it, recall the past few years and decades, whether it was the years when internet streaming platforms like iQIYI and Youku suddenly became popular, or the years when self-media short video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou suddenly became popular—did they have any impact on the box office of cinemas in the CCP-ruled China? The fact is, there was no impact at all; these fields all developed in peaceful coexistence.
From 44 billion in 2015, the box office in the CCP-ruled China, after experiencing more than a decade of internet impact and various internet video models, reached 51.8 billion last year. 44 billion in 2015, 51.8 billion last year. Except for being a bit lower during the pandemic, it has been hovering around the 50 billion line for these ten-plus years—sometimes better at over 60 billion, sometimes worse at over 40 billion. It has always been like this.
Ah, which means no matter how popular the blockbusters on the internet or short videos from self-media become, they have had no impact on the cinema chains in the CCP-ruled China. Why is this? Economics has a clear answer; those who have studied logical economic analysis know that the consumer groups for going to the cinema and watching videos on a mobile phone are completely different, and the purposes of these two consumption behaviors have nothing in common.
On the surface, both are watching videos, but in reality, the overlap of the groups is small. Going to the cinema to watch a movie is inherently a public social activity. So everyone finds that very few people go to the cinema to watch a movie alone. There is survey data on the entire movie-going group showing that the proportion of individuals is very small. Ah, whether it's for family activities, dating, fostering emotions, or various other purposes, basically, everyone goes to the cinema to watch a movie as a form of public social behavior.
Ah, watching internet videos at home is a consumption of individual daily entertainment time, so there is almost no situation where multiple people watch a specific internet short drama or self-media video together. Do you understand? These two seemingly similar behaviors—watching movies and watching internet videos—belong to fundamentally different consumer decisions in economics and are non-substitutable consumption behaviors. That is why, for over a decade, no matter how popular online movies and self-media short videos in the CCP-ruled China became, they had no impact on the cinema chains.
Therefore, the plunge in cinema box office in 2026 means the industry is collapsing, the economy is getting worse, and the people are getting poorer with no money in their pockets. So, everyone has no demand for public social activities—watching movies requires more than one person—and they stop watching movies. Ah, the Chinese Communist Party is whitewashing the situation, and state media is coming out to muddy the waters and set the narrative. It is a problem caused by the poor national economy, but they attribute it to the rise of a new industry—oh, short dramas have appeared, so the consumption economy has shifted. Why do they do this? This can cover up the fact that the Chinese economy is getting worse and worse.
Ah, looking at the essence through the phenomena, don't get led astray by others. Why is studying logic so important? Many people always say they get scammed and scammed. Remember this, if you get scammed, you must go study logic, because your core habit of thinking logically has not been formed. Right, this person is so fucking rich, yet they are still looking to you for financing—do you even know them? They have such wealthy people around them to make big money, turning one million into one hundred million, why the fuck wouldn't they keep it close to themselves, or at best tell their own fucking close parents, how could they let some distant stranger like you know? They've lost their minds, are there such kind-hearted people? Logic tells you at once that it's impossible. I've been talking about this for decades, since I was in my twenties, those who expect iron pies to fall from the sky can only count on iron cakes and wait to die.
Well, once you study logic, you understand it. Of course, the CCP muddies the waters and sets the narrative like this in every field. Take this year, for example, the GDP growth rates of Beijing and Shanghai in the Chinese mainland in the first three quarters far exceeded the national average, fixed-asset investment increased significantly, and disposable income grew rapidly year-on-year, but retail sales figures dropped and even turned negative, with people refusing to buy things.
That's normal, if you don't listen, anyone knows people are getting poorer and poorer. Chinese state media explained that the decline in retail sales figures was mainly due to the consumption in the automotive industry dropping too fast. Retail sales include many social retail sectors, and one of them is the automotive industry. If you exclude the auto sales sector, the overall retail sales figure is actually rising. Ah, saying it like this gives people the impression that the consumer markets in Beijing and Shanghai seem to have no problem, and the poor performance is solely caused by this single sub-sector of auto consumption.
If you understand logic, you'll know how bullshit the CCP's narrative is, it's sheer nonsense. Because after decades of reform and opening up, no matter how the internal industrial structure of Beijing and Shanghai is adjusted, and no matter which consumption sector rises or falls, the rule has always been that when GDP growth, fixed-asset investment growth, and disposable income growth happen, retail sales must also grow year-on-year.
It's been like this for decades, it's been like this for decades. Have there been similar declines in sectors like consumption within retail sales data over these decades? Yes, but when this sector declined, other sectors rose to take its place, which is called waxing and waning, and the growth could even offset the reduction in consumption, so in the end, overall consumption grew. What about this year's situation? GDP is still growing, fixed investment is growing, disposable income is growing, and retail sales data declined year-on-year, even turning negative. Then state media says if you break it down and look at it, this is muddying the waters, understand? Because what drove decades of retail growth was never just a single field.
Ah, not not a single field, as long as the first few key elements are there, retail sales grow. If you really want to break it down and study the issue, the conclusion you should reach is that there is no more waxing and waning, only waning, no waxing. The past waxing and waning in China's consumption sector has disappeared, yes, this is the key issue. Autos are gone, declined, other sectors are no good either, there are no replacements stepping up, so the entire consumption structure has huge problems.
Well, the CCP doesn't muddy the waters by saying that, it tells you to strip out the auto sector, and the conclusion reached is that consumption in the remaining sectors has grown! Everyone doesn't need to look, this is fucking sheer nonsense! It's like a school, I'll give an example and it'll be clear. For decades, the exam scores of students in a certain class of a school, as long as other conditions kept up, regardless of good or bad, the average scores increased significantly.
Now all other conditions have kept up, but the average score has dropped, dropped significantly. Then in the analysis, they tell you that by excluding the three worst-performing students in the class, the average score of the remaining students still increased. So the answer is that the teaching system has no problem, it's just that these three students performed too poorly. Isn't this fucking nonsense? Sorry, started cursing. Isn't this fucking nonsense? Then what if thirty students perform poorly in the future? Exclude thirty students, and the average score of the remaining students still increases.
Does this kind of explanation sound like an asshole to you? What you talked about in the past was the average score of all good and bad students in the class, because your method was correct, your baseline conditions were there, so everyone grew, this one is worse, that one is better, and the average numerator of the good ones kept growing. As a result, after a massive drop now, you say exclude the worst, and if there are more bad ones, exclude them again, and if there are more bad ones—well, of course! Out of fifty students in a class, if you exclude forty-nine of the worst, even the single one left is growing.
Isn't this an asshole statement? Can logic analyze problems like this? Understand? All CCP state media are doing this, it's not a teleprompter, there's stuff written right in front of them. With my pre-dementia brain, how could I remember so much stuff? I always read from a script, if I were writing a verbatim manuscript, one look tells you you're a newcomer. All my old users know about this stuff.
Ah, if you're some kind of CCP whatever-whatever person, then why are you attacking me, you must be sick, right? If you're a newbie, then I won't chat about much. I always read using my brain, I write verbatim manuscripts, you see. Or why do my eyes keep glancing over there? Ha, you're really funny, I think for you to pay attention to this when listening to things makes you a divine being too. I suggest you stop listening, when you listen to people talk, your focus is not even on the content being spoken, your focus has nothing to do with what's being said. Why are you even listening? It would be great for you to go do some detective research, go ahead! Stop listening, stop listening, hurry up and leave, alright?
And then in 2026, a large number of rules and regular patterns were broken in China, and this was no exception. GDP growth, fixed-asset investment growth, per capita disposable income growth, and total retail sales of consumer goods all dropped—the same thing. Why? No matter how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) explains it, the core reason boils down to one thing: the economy is getting worse and worse, consumers are getting poorer and poorer, and they have less and less hope for future life, so they stop consuming. Previously, people with money in their pockets consumed; now they see no hope, get scared, and stop consuming. Previously, people without money in their pockets borrowed money to consume; now they see no possibility of earning money in the future to repay debts, and they stop consuming.
So when nobody is consuming, many bizarre situations appear, right? The CCP certainly cannot let everyone see clearly. Just like the film industry, it cannot tell you that the problem is my fault, that I made the economy too bad. It has to muddy the waters; it can only muddy the waters. As long as you all understand. I have already talked about these things and analyzed the content: you must understand not only the phenomenon itself but also the underlying reasons, and then we can draw inferences and achieve comprehensive understanding, right? Turn the public's lack of hope for the future—
which leads to people having no public demands and not daring to consume—into false reasons for changes in certain industries, and then guide the rabble of the CCP, the rabble of the CCP's country, to produce wrong thinking. Moreover, writing like this can continue to kiss the ass of the fucking idiot Xi Jinping upward. There is no problem, the policy has no flaws, the bottom has not changed much, manufacturing false omens of social false prosperity.
Learn logic, okay? You must learn logic! You must learn logic! When the economy is poor, the overall social natural environment is depressed, and official data and other fields will all be depressed. In the first three quarters, the number of marriage registrations in China was only 4.648 million pairs, 504,000 pairs fewer than the same period in 2025. Listen clearly: a drop of that much, a total of just over four million people getting married, and it dropped by 504,000 pairs compared to the same period last year, a year-on-year decrease of over 10 percent. Non-judgment divorces—divorces not judged by a court—numbered 2.082 million pairs, nearly 10,000 pairs more than last year.
Both sets of data have once again broken the lowest statistical records since the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949: the lowest number of marriages in the same period and the highest number of non-judgment divorces. Perhaps court judgments will also be the highest according to current trends. Everything is breaking records. Without previous records—before 1978, before the CCP's country had official statistical data, we can deduce it anyway, because starting from 1949, the CCP's country said the population was about 540 million in total. However, the newly born population in 1950 reached 20.23 million, so until 1978, even assuming an average of three children born per couple, the annual number of marriages was at least over 10 million pairs.
At least 10 million! The data I just talked about this year, in the third quarter, was just over four million. Because a lot of people used to get married, everyone understands. Because too many people got married, a lot of people gave birth. Therefore, the CCP's country's population of 500 million in 1949 rose to 1.4 billion in recent years. Even after family planning, it still rose to 1.4 billion. Just think about how many people got married!
After the fucking idiot Xi Jinping came to power, this situation reversed. As everyone knows, China's crude marriage rate in 2026 is projected to be only about 4 per thousand. The proportion of people truly getting married is not only at the lowest level in the history of the People's Republic of China, but this has also resulted in a birth rate directly derived from marriage that currently ranks last in the world for China. Last in the world! On the surface, some little pinks might say, well, there are still some EU countries with crude marriage rates lower than China's, like China at 4 per thousand and them at 3.8 or 3.9 per thousand.
However, EU official data tells you that over the past decade or so, an average of about 40 percent of newborns each year are non-marital births, meaning nearly half of the people in the EU are not born after marriage. They have children without getting married. So your crude marriage rate in China is 4 per thousand, while theirs is 3.8 or 3.9, but they give birth to twice as many children as you do. Therefore, the true birth rates of these countries far exceed that of the CCP's country, okay? Not only are the people currently getting married very few in absolute terms, which is terrifying, but the acceleration is even more terrifying.
After the fucking idiot Xi Jinping came to power and took charge, 13.47 million pairs got married in China in 2013, and back then there were still that many, but by last year it was down to 6.1 million, a drop of 55 percent. Moreover, this year's trend is still expanding. So I always say, let's present the facts and reason things out. With facts right there, no matter what you use to argue, it's useless. Therefore, essentially, people in the CCP's country don't watch movies, don't consume, don't get married, and don't have children; they are simply surviving.
This is a result completely caused by having no hope for the future at all right now, a result completely caused by having no hope for the future. And why is there no hope for the future? You talk about it—someone talks about it, and in a moment I'll tell you about your mutual funds. In a moment I'll say that this is closely related to everyone's current existence regarding work intensity, income conditions, social stability, environmental impact, survival security, family and personal pressures, and so on. These are all factors that lead to everyone having no hope for the future.
Among these factors, if most of them turn negative—for example, if work intensity keeps increasing, income keeps decreasing, society becomes increasingly unstable, the surrounding environment becomes more depressed, safety and survival guarantees worsen, and family and personal pressures mount—then it goes without saying that this person will inevitably feel less and less hopeful about the future.
Alright, so for the second point, I hope everyone will make an effort to learn some logic and see clearly that everything is currently collapsing and declining; there is not a single field that is not collapsing or declining. Moreover, the depth of this decline is extreme—not just ordinary, but extreme—because if you look at it now, it is unwatchable. For instance, Chinese cars in other countries—uh, safety, Chery and the like—their safety attributes are zero, the drivability for passengers is zero, the safety attributes for children are zero, and so on. The quality of exported cars is even better than those sold domestically. You really cannot just look at this country in isolation; you have to look at it comprehensively. Everyone is just at their wit's end.
So, what is today's topic? Continuing with the White Terror of the Fifth Plenary Session. I talked to you about this topic last time, which is that the core of the 20th Central Committee's Fifth Plenary Session is that the fucking idiot Xi Jinping wants to create a clear White Terror within the People's Republic of China, especially within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). At that time, the 17,000-word decision of the 20th Central Committee's Fifth Plenary Session had not yet been released; no one had seen it, which is why I spoke about it then.
I said this fucking idiot Xi Jinping wants to create a White Terror, but after I finished speaking, I noticed that no one in the comment section seemed to be discussing this issue. I suspect that at that time, perhaps everyone, including some good friends, didn't believe my judgment, right? There's no pressure from White Terror, is there? So today, I will talk to you about it, and we will present the facts and reason things out. Now, the 17,000-word decision of the 20th Central Committee's Fifth Plenary Session has been released.
After you finished reading it, did you understand everything? The thinking is very clear. This decision discusses eight aspects. These are the specific implementations of the eight aspects and 39 major issues that this fucking idiot Xi Jinping mentioned at the Politburo meeting at the beginning of the year. Eight contents—listen to these eight contents. The 17,000-word decision only has eight. The first part is to strengthen the supreme political authority of the fucking idiot Xi Jinping, supreme political authority. Therefore, the decision repeatedly emphasizes the 'Two Establishes' and the 'Two Safeguards.' I said this last time, and there were still people replying below, saying the announcement didn't mention the 'Two Establishes' or the 'Two Safeguards.' Oh my, I really don't know what to say.
You believe what Wang Shi says? Take a look at the resolution and decision of the Fifth Plenary Session; it repeatedly emphasizes the 'Two Establishes' and the 'Two Safeguards,' and repeatedly emphasizes the core status of Xi Jinping's party-building thought in the future party-building of the CCP. Using various rhetoric, repeating it constantly from both positive and negative angles, this fucking idiot Xi Jinping is the center of the Chinese Communist Party's political thought and power command. Do you understand? The first part of this decision is to strengthen the supreme dictatorial status of the fucking idiot Xi Jinping.
Not very clear about White Terror life. I said last time what the scope of White Terror includes; it's okay, I'll talk about it in a moment, and you will experience it personally and understand. That personal experience means that the dictatorship of this fucking idiot Xi Jinping has reached an infinitely high level across the country and the entire party; since the founding of the Chinese Communist Party, there has never been such a person. The only interesting thing is that it doesn't mention the entire military.
Why doesn't it mention the entire military? It can't be mentioned. The reason is what we discussed in detail before. Now, the state of confrontation between the military and Xi Jinping is such that they only mention the entire party and the entire country, not the entire military. But within the party and the country, excluding the military, the core of the 20th Central Committee's Fifth Plenary Session is to infinitely, infinitely, infinitely strengthen the supreme political authority of this fucking idiot Xi Jinping. Hey, this is the first point. The second point, what does it talk about? It talks about restricting the power of the heads of various departments within the party on a large scale, strengthening collective decision-making, and prohibiting 'one-man rule.'
As long as the head of the department speaks last—what is speaking last for? The article is already set, the big picture and tone are already set, and the collective has already discussed it. The head of the department speaks last; you cannot completely overturn it, right? If you overturn it, how can the people below get work done? Understood? Actually, speaking of this, everyone understands: it is to restrict power, to restrict the personal power of the heads of various central ministries and local leaders.
It becomes smaller, it becomes smaller. The first point says two hundred fucking names—this fucking idiot wants to be more and more dictatorial. And to be more and more dictatorial, he is afraid of people rebelling, afraid of people doing things. His power is infinitely large, so what about the power of others? It becomes smaller. Those who have power in the party other than him are the heads of various central ministries and local departments. So what? Make this power smaller for them.
On one hand, he is definitely worried about people sharing his power, rebelling, and so on. On the other hand, the current situation of losing control of the military has also given this fucking idiot a serious lesson. Because previously, the military was managed by Zhang Youxia, and many people in the military had power. Besides Zhang Youxia, Zhang Youxia must have been decentralizing power. As a result, he took Zhang Youxia, but the various military regions and major military branches still had power, possessed power to oppose him, and he had no way to deal with it. The Chinese military was originally a composite structure, consistent with Deng Xiaoping's collective leadership; Zhang Youxia did not have 'one-man rule.' Therefore, by removing Zhang Youxia, he couldn't move the military; it was still a solid block.
Sigh, so this might also be the unspeakable pain in Xi Jinping's heart, which ultimately led to the decision to restrict the power of top leaders at all levels within the Party, except for his own immense power. And the result? As we have discussed before, in physical terms, this is the rule of the Creator: among so many structures, there is only one load-bearing point—you, the fucking idiot Xi Jinping—while everything else is a non-load-bearing point. Previously, there were still some central load-bearing top leaders, but Xi Jinping has dismantled all those places. From now on, the entire massive structure of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has only one fucking center, only one load-bearing point. Any talk of successors or heirs to Xi Jinping is all bullshit.
This fucking idiot is telling us one thing through his own real actions: As long as I am alive, the CCP lives! If I fucking die, the CCP can just wait to die. But in the future, there will be no CCP, just fucking Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping is the CCP, and the CCP is Xi Jinping. That's right, everything else is gone; there is no load-bearing, no power. Isn't that how it is? Without any load-bearing, without any power, the entire power of the Party and the state rests on him alone. He alone has the final say on everything. Isn't that how it is? What successors, what heirs? What are you going to inherit? What are you going to succeed? What power are you going to possess?
Alright, those two points are already ruthless enough. The third point is to strengthen supervision—not only strengthening supervision at the same level but also strengthening supervision of superiors by subordinates within the organization. Any member of a leadership team, regardless of whether you are a peer or a superior/subordinate, must strictly supervise each other. If a subordinate discovers a problem, they must report it upward in a timely manner. Problems of members within the leadership team must be reported upward; it's not about discovering problems and discussing or summarizing them within the team, but reporting them upward. In the words of us common folk, what is this called? It's snitching. That is to say, a mechanism for reporting on leadership cadres is to be established throughout the entire Party.
Everyone think about it, the internal struggle within the CCP has always been fierce. Why are you the top leader and I am not? Because if one prospers, all prosper; if one is humiliated, all are humiliated. When one person attains the Tao, their chickens and dogs ascend to heaven. So, for the sake of power within the organization, everyone is fighting each other. And now, within the team, everyone is supervising each other, and subordinates are required to supervise, discover problems in those above them, and then report them across levels. Just think about it, what kind of scene is that? The third point is strengthening supervision, and the fourth point is establishing a vertical supervision system. What does that mean? Subordinate discipline inspection commissions must report the movements of the top two leaders and major officials to their superiors separately every six months.
Then, the power of those top two leaders is not just within the organization; even the subordinate discipline inspection commissions can supervise them and report upward. So in the end, it means everyone within this team is supervising each other without any blind spots—supervised by peers, supervised by subordinates, and the top leader is even fucking supervised by the discipline inspection commission. And then, if the top leader is held responsible for any failures, they have to take all the blame, yet they only have the right to final confirmation after a decision is made. Let's think about it, isn't it terrifying? Fifth, fourth, establishing a vertical chain. Fifth, comprehensively strengthen the identification of political loyalty within the Party, requiring all leadership cadres to be absolutely loyal to the fucking idiot Xi Jinping.
It requires accurate identification and the resolute and comprehensive removal of "two-faced people" within the Party. It involves comprehensive and uninterrupted examination of the loyalty to Xi Jinping shown by Party leadership cadres in their words, deeds, social interactions, and all other aspects. That is to say, whether it's your work, daily life, or interpersonal relationships, everything is an examination of your loyalty to Xi Jinping.
It's just short of making everyone dance the 'Zhong' dance, just short of everyone pinning a symbol of Xi Jinping on their chests. When all leaders meet, it's just 'absolute loyalty, absolute loyalty'—that's all that's missing. Beyond this form, the content you're talking about has already reached this point. There is supervision within the organization, comprehensive supervision of superiors by subordinates, and the strengthening of the identification of political loyalty. So just think about it.
That's right, everyone is an isolated island. No one dares to speak inside; between each other, well, don't even mention it. If you are a "two-faced person," you are disloyal; you are a "two-faced person." There is only total loyalty, total loyalty—you have to shout it even when going to the bathroom. Sixth, listen to this, how ruthless these eight points are. Truly unprecedented, how ruthless, this is truly unprecedented! It's called strengthening the full-cycle management of cadres. This is listed in the decision itself. These eight points: strengthen the full-cycle management of cadres. For all incumbent and retired Party leadership cadres, in addition to supervising and managing the individuals themselves, there is also comprehensive supervision of the property, life, social interactions, and all other aspects involving their spouses and children.
That is to say, this scope—in the past, leadership cadre supervision was for those in office, but now it is expanded to include the retired, and it must cover the entire family of the retired, fully and comprehensively. Seventh, strengthen decision-making accountability; major decisions carry lifelong accountability.
Standardize the handover system for leadership cadres. That is to say, what? The sixth point: everyone around all leadership cadres is supervised; the seventh point: full-cycle life supervision. As long as you are alive, you are supervised. Whether you are retired or not, the CCP can arrest you. The most critical part comes now: the sixth and seventh parts, especially the seventh part, have a clear point called "breaking the Iron-Cap Prince."
This concept was raised more than ten years ago when investigating national-level and deputy-national-level leadership cadres, but it wasn't mentioned later. Now it's called "breaking the Iron-Cap Prince," clearly the same as back then. Then you go and look at the explanation of what "breaking the Iron-Cap Prince" meant back then; it meant starting to investigate retired national-level and deputy-national-level leadership cadres, as well as incumbent national-level and deputy-national-level leadership cadres. Once this point comes out, where the fuck are there any political elders left? In other words, once this becomes a decision of the Party's plenary session—and this is a decision of the entire Party's plenary session—it means that everyone, including Hu Jintao, has become fish on the chopping block of the fucking idiot Xi Jinping.
Xi Jinping is the butcher’s knife, and everyone else is fish. Hu Jintao is fucking an iron-capped prince, right? The delegates, and all the rest of them, are fucking iron-capped princes—Wang Qishan is an iron-capped prince. It's this particular line coming out that makes it a decision! I am talking about a decision made by the entire party. So Xi Jinping is the butcher’s knife, and everyone else is fish. Who the fuck cares who you are? You're just brought in to be chopped up further. So whoever talks to you about political elders in the future is a fraud; just shut them down directly.
This decision has come out—a decision of the entire party. Fuck, what else is there to talk about? What else is there to talk about? You can't keep making things up anymore, you can't make things up, there's no room left to fabricate anything! This is a decision of the entire party. To take it a step further, eighth, if you old-timers had any methods, if you had even a shred of ability, this provision wouldn't have passed, and it wouldn't have become a decision of the entire party. Can you understand that? Do you get it?
Eighth, strengthening the scope and role of discipline inspection and supervision work, massively expanding the scope and role of discipline inspection and supervision within the CCP system. To put it simply, the secret agent organizations of the Eastern and Western Depots have become even more massive, with more comprehensive functions, alright? Think about it yourselves. Just look at this—this is a decision of the entire party. Aside from the military, the Fifth Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee encompasses everyone in the entire party. These people include all current prominent local leading cadres in China, including the military. They are all these people, aren't they? They are the leaders of the CCP, right?
Eight points: First, reinforcing the supreme political authority of that fucking idiot Xi Jinping—one person has the final say, a dictatorship. Second, broadly restricting the power of top officials at all levels within the party, meaning only Xi Jinping can have increased power while everyone else loses theirs. Third, strengthening mutual supervision. Fourth, establishing a vertical supervision system. Fifth, comprehensively strengthening political loyalty verification within the party; in the past, there was talk of catching corruption and all that, but that's gone. From now on, political disloyalty or being a two-faced person will get you destroyed, and corruption won't even be the critical issue. Sixth, strengthening—this is a party decision! I keep repeating this phrase so you understand its importance.
It belongs to the whole party. Sixth, strengthening the full-lifecycle management of cadres; wives and children are managed too. Seventh, strengthening accountability for decision-making, specifically confirming the smashing of the iron-capped princes—it doesn't matter if you're retired or not, it doesn't matter how high-ranking you were in the past. Even if you're Hu Jintao, you'll still be fucking destroyed all the same. Eighth, strengthening discipline inspection and supervision, and this isn't me, Xi Jinping, saying it—this is the joint decision of the party. Do you understand? People think, people think—what about waiting to see the situation regarding consecutive terms? Oh, do you even need to question a consecutive term? How long ago was that settled?
Do you know what a reign of terror is now? Put yourself in their shoes—if you were a party cadre, how would you feel? Regarding all the important documents of the Fifth Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee, Xi Jinping not only served as the head of the drafting and editing groups, but these documents were ultimately revised and finalized by Xi Jinping himself. The signature on the documents is Xi Jinping. Xinhua News Agency claimed outwardly that even though Xi Jinping drafted and edited them, the manuscript underwent a total of thirty-six versions.
Thirty-six drafts were produced, revised over and over again, heavily revised thirty-six times, receiving 1,173 modification suggestions from various quarters, and after additions, revisions, and streamlining in 81 places—over 17,000 characters—they were streamlined in 81 places. Then, they accepted 208 suggestions put forward before the meeting and 100 suggestions during the meeting; these were the ones accepted. Based on these suggestions, 81 places were streamlined and revised. Just think, if you were an insider in the CCP, how would you feel after reading this decision? Would you dare to submit a more lenient modification suggestion?
Think about the suggestions you might submit—they would almost certainly be flattery, demanding even stricter requirements! Everything is already written down with such demands for even stricter rules, or are you going to sing a different tune from Xi Jinping and demand leniency? What kind of proposal would you dare to write and submit upward? So it can basically be confirmed that in the places that were modified, no one dared to sing a different tune.
No one dared to sing a different tune. Whatever was modified either had no principled issues or became even stricter. CCP official media carried out massive, blatant flattery regarding the whole process when that fucking idiot Xi Jinping formulated this decision. Xinhua News Agency specifically published a long article called "The Birth of the Decision." That fucking idiot Xi Jinping himself emphasized in his explanation of the decision why he was doing this: he considers consolidating the party's long-term governance position as the primary consideration in determining the agenda and decisions of the plenary session. Fuck, is it the party's long-term governance, or is it your fucking long-term dictatorship, Xi Jinping?
If the party is to govern for the long term, then the country must be doing well for you to govern for the long term, right? If the country is dead, how can you govern? Look at these eight points—which one has anything to do with the country doing well? So do you understand now? The Chinese Communist Party has already vanished; the Chinese Communist Party has now truly become a cleansed party, a genuine cleansed party. This decision—the decision of the entire party—has come out, and everyone who controls all the critical aspects of this country, whether it's resources, conditions, or ideology, as long as they are people in key positions, are all included in this party plenary session.
Nominally, they are all in the plenary session, because aside from the military—well, the military has one representative too, Politburo member Zhang Shengmin, nominally. But besides the military being nominal, the rest of the actual top leaders are all in this plenary session. Everyone approved it with a unanimous vote; it passed. So as the old saying goes, put yourself in their shoes: can you now comprehend what a reign of terror feels like? If you're an official, you wouldn't even dare to speak in your dreams—you wouldn't even dare to speak in your dreams, seriously, you wouldn't even dare to tell the truth while taking a shit on the toilet.
What is white terror? Do you understand now? When the gatekeeper nods at you, and because your eyesight is poor, you even wonder if this bastard has got some dirt on you? Reporting you upward—just think about this kind of environment, what is terror? It is not about killing people; terror is making you live in constant anxiety every day, not knowing whether you might be dragged away at any moment. That is what we call terror.
Of course, what is the result of doing this in the end? Everyone understands, and that is it will definitely make the entire country die faster. Because no matter what, this country still relies on its economy and people's livelihood to stay afloat. No matter how determined your politics are, if you have no economy and no livelihood, what do you use to hold things up? Right, and now, doing this to this extent is already terrifying, and with such terror, does anyone still bother doing actual work? Right? Does anyone still bother doing real work? Will a top leader who doesn't want to die still go out and work? Work hard? If you work hard, wouldn't you die even faster?
Let's stick to the facts and reason it out; things have already reached this point. Do you now have a personal, firsthand experience of the white terror I talked about last time? Of course, this white terror will spread downward within the party. Let's look at their information. How come there are things moving downward in 2027? It's all like this.
Things moving downward—of course, for this downward movement, you shouldn't expect it to affect you if you are not a party member. Because after 1949, the core of the Chinese Communist Party has always been, as we all know, this 100 million party members, the descendants of the Eight Banners, the stabilizer of the entire CCP system, ranging from old men on the verge of death to those who just joined the party in schools. This is the stabilizer, right. Now that this core of 100 million people begins to implement white terror, the terror and panic within this core of 100 million will spread from the inside out, from top to bottom. If the economic crisis gets increasingly severe and the basic income of many people within this 100 million stabilizers can no longer be guaranteed, that stabilizer is going to collapse, and that will be a truly massive collapse.
The spread of white terror definitely goes from inside the party downward; it definitely goes from inside the party downward. Some people say that those who can't get out should try to go to the south, that it's possible to go to the south, and things will be slightly better in the south. History is also like this; it will be slightly better. And then this fucking Xi Jinping.
A person facing doom, just let him play his tricks, let him play, watch him play, watch him face his doom, and watch the future changes in China. At the beginning of 2026, I mentioned that in 2026 Chinese society will undergo a huge change that everyone will be able to feel very clearly. Go back and check what I said at the beginning of 2026—in 2025 I said there would be bankruptcies for a few years, but I never said 2025 specifically, I never told anyone that once. If you check 2025, Chinese society will experience a massive, extremely clear social upheaval in terms of direct sensory experience. But for the beginning of 2026, I told everyone.
Now, as 2026 approaches the present, isn't it a massive upheaval with a very clear sensory experience for you? Go and check for yourselves. Right, and as we reach the end of 2026, I am telling everyone that 2027 is going to collapse. Many people still don't believe it. Back at the beginning of 2026, I said there would be a massive upheaval, and people didn't believe it. Now, after less than a year—just a little over a month short—I believe you all have seen the facts. So I am telling you, 2027 is going to collapse. Do you see what 2027 will be like? It doesn't matter if you don't believe it; just wait and see whether my crow's mouth turns out to be right or not.
Not right? Let's see if my crow's mouth is right or not! This plenary session is too fucking awesome! I can only say that the decision of the Fifth Plenary Session this time is too fucking awesome! In the history of the Chinese Communist Party, for such a document to appear, I fucking swear, aside from the time of the Great Purge back then—during the suppression of counterrevolutionaries—something like this only appeared during the suppression movements.
It didn't even appear during the Cultural Revolution; the Cultural Revolution Leading Group never had anything like this, ah, it's really fucking awesome. Long live Chairman Mao, ten thousand years, ten thousand, ten thousand years, and even he never restricted the power of top leaders to this extent. Local levels certainly never stated that the families of all leading cadres across the board, ah, all family members, and all related financial and social circles would be completely monitored, and that the entire lifecycle of everyone from retirement onwards would be managed—they never claimed anything like that, alright? Ah, now this "iron-hatted prince" is similar to that time when Mao Zedong wrote that fucking "Bombard the Headquarters," putting up big-character posters about headquarters, Liu Shaoqi and them—the red headquarters and the black headquarters—this is fucking similar now, today.
Um, so now, well, it's something fierce, alright? Ah, it's hopeless—no, it's not hopeless. I've found someone now. I want to clarify what I just said a moment ago. Whether it's US stocks, or Winnie, I suggest, I—I—I hope someone among you who is in the CCP, in the public security, procuratorates, or courts of the People's Republic of China, and has exceptionally good and close connections, someone inside the system—inside the system, can get in touch to confirm things with me. Uh, a case has already been filed abroad, ah, it has already been filed, but uh, this requires help from inside China, preferably from the public security, best of all from the public security. I've looked for friends in Shanghai and Guangzhou, but the public security in Shanghai and Guangzhou won't do; they are super arrogant and completely ignore it, saying it's a foreign matter.
Ah, ah, they totally ignore it! Things are proceeding smoothly abroad, but as you know, the work efficiency and related circumstances on the foreign side, therefore, now I need, if I can find people in this field domestically, to send me an email, send me an email, domestic ones—you guys are formidable, I'll have them contact me directly—you don't have to give it to me, I'll have them directly interface with my overseas legal team to handle this matter, alright? Ah, to handle this matter, ah, I am spending so much cost, but because there are so many people, this matter will still be carried out.
I told everyone late last time, and it was for this matter! If you have connections, you must find them for me! In China now, people are fucking staying at the police (Public Security) station, staying there for twenty-four hours, just hanging around and refusing to leave. Even if you try to find someone to resolve it, it can't be solved. It's super fucked up! Let me tell you, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is currently in internal turmoil.
Oh, they are more anxious than anyone here about the 'Iron Hat Kings' (high-ranking officials). Fuck, it's not just more anxious; what is white terror? Do you know what it feels like to live in terror? Even if you haven't been arrested, someone could kick down your door at any time; someone could kick down your door at any time.
Alright, what else? What other questions? Ah, there are many bankruptcies, many bankruptcies. Recently in Chongqing, there was a company that used to be ranked in the top ten nationwide, I think it was called Kunpeng, a third-party payment company specializing in POS card processing. It's huge. It is said that it has now affected over a million people. This institution has imploded, but logically, third-party payment companies shouldn't be able to touch users' money; the money is supposed to be under the special account supervision of the People's Bank of China. We also know that within the CCP system, everything is an unwritten rule.
Ah, so this portion of funds was misappropriated, and some high-level people were involved in the misappropriation, so now the money is gone. What does that mean? It means that for you people in these places, the millions of people nationwide who are affected, I know that you swiped your cards, the cards are gone, the money was deducted, but the merchants didn't receive the payment because these funds were transferred away, they were transferred away. This matter, actually, in the financial system, there will be a lot of such incidents in the future. Invade Taiwan in 2027? What are you thinking?
Take a look at the US suggestions, take a look, I suggest you take a look. First, let me tell everyone one thing: in American history, whenever the US has established a strategic defense system, regardless of whether it was in a Gulf country or wherever they established such an institution, as long as a war threat appeared, the US has always used it, always used it—it's called the Davidson Window.
Take a look at it, alright. Speaking of the Taiwan issue, you should look at the Davidson Window. Why do I mention the Davidson Window? Because the commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, Admiral Davidson, confirmed at the Hawaii conference that the Davidson Window is effective, requiring the US military to complete forward deployment preparations in the Pacific direction before April 2, 2027, to respond to a potential war in the Taiwan Strait in 2027.
What does that mean? I'm telling you, just look at it and you'll know. Take another look at this Davidson Window; it means the US will definitely participate in the war. In the history of the US since its founding, as long as such a military defense system has been established—and Taiwan, as I have said, holds a core position in the First Island Chain—it goes without saying. So, they are establishing such a system, and it will be fully established before April 2027, which is telling you that there will be a war, and as long as the CCP dares to make a move, the US will definitely participate. Just think about it, alright, the US will definitely participate.
Ah, and what is the result of US participation? You go think about it. I won't go there with you, I won't talk about it, I won't discuss it in detail. Ah, as for the military bases the US has deployed in Japan, the military bases in the Philippines, and those around Taiwan, missiles have long been deployed there. These were deployed directly by the US state itself, alright, deployed directly by them. Ah, you can go check the rest yourselves. So, the matter of attacking Taiwan, I have said countless times from various aspects, it is simply impossible, simply impossible.
Not to mention that China doesn't have the conditions to attack Taiwan, and not to mention how rotten the Chinese military is, you should know that the actual combat capability of the US compared to China—fuck, it's vulnerable! Russia is still fighting wars frequently, and they can't even handle the EU, let alone the US. Those who fight real wars are different from those who just talk big. Back in the day, whether it was the Korean War or the Vietnam War, in any system where it had its military facilities, as long as the relevant system was established and documents were issued, it was certain to participate in the war; there's no need to think about that. Ah, there are plenty of government documents in US history regarding the First Island Chain and Taiwan, alright, plenty of them, so I won't say anything more, hmm, I won't say anything more.
Uh, the government doesn't reveal the bottom line. China has all sorts of problems, and the government can't cover them all, ah, they can't cover them all. Right, the US supports its military through war. Do you really know what fighting a war is like? Whether it's weapons and equipment or the quality of the troops, everything that is bragged about is completely different from things in real life! So in reality, no matter how much you brag, in reality, it is basically vulnerable, all vulnerable.
It's no use if the Secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs Commission has retired. It's no use if the Secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs Commission has retired. If you are close with the Secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs Commission, ask him if he knows anyone currently in office? Right, it must be the public security, procuratorate, and judiciary. Uh, preferably the police (Public Security). Checking on people won't work because I need to get things done, meaning I need to have the domestic system coordinate with overseas institutions to handle this case, to handle this case. I've talked about the digital yuan before; China is trying to use the digital yuan to control the wealth of all Chinese people, ah, take a look, take a look, I've talked about it before, it's very detailed.
What other questions are there? The positions corresponding to 20 million retirees—is this not a matter of 20 million retirees now? Exactly, it is not a matter of 20 million retirees. The substitutability of those positions, the early retirement aspect—how severe is the downsizing of positions now? The economic scale, the real economic scale—let's not bullshit here. When the real economic scale is 10 million, we're not even counting AI or anything else; when the real, true value scale is 10 million, then you need 10 million positions. When the real, true economic scale is 1 million, you only need 1 million positions. Therefore, in the process of economic recession in any country, the most direct problem is unemployment.
It is unemployment, so it has nothing to do with how many people are retiring. If your recession is fast, people who haven't retired have no work either—don't, people who haven't retired have no work either, so don't mention that retirement frees up job positions. The speed at which your economic scale is shrinking—well, what if your economic scale is expanding like crazy? If it's expanding like crazy, even if no one has retired, there will be plenty of positions, all positions, okay? Yeah.
That's it then, I have nothing else to say, what else is there to talk about? If you can exchange for US dollars domestically, that would be best, of course. But I estimate you probably can't do it now, it's probably very difficult for you to exchange for US dollars now, okay? Yeah, that's it for today.
My AI project is still in progress, and I also suggest you do it yourselves, because my AI has nothing to do with you all, nothing to do with you. So you should all learn more about AI yourselves, things that are relevant to you. But it's better abroad; domestic AI is still not quite there, okay? Domestic AI is still not quite there.
So, my good friends, that's it. Thank you all for spending so much time listening to my bullshit. I'm just chatting with you all in my spare time, just one person's opinion. Feel free to criticize. I wish my good friends in China a good night's sleep, and my friends overseas all the best. Don't forget what I just said—this case has already been filed, it has been filed abroad. And what I need now is, uh, if you have connections, I have already found people domestically...
No, if you have connections, you must send me an email! This matter will go directly through legal channels, it's going through legal channels, nothing else can solve it! Because you cannot understand my hard work; actually, you can understand—from 2055 to 2026, you should know how many trips I've made, you should know how many people I've sought out for this matter! So, this matter, it can only go through legal proceedings now, okay? Yeah, that's it, thank you everyone! Thank you everyone! Thank you.