[Lude Society] Dubai Hijacking Terrorist Suspected of Ties to “Al-Qaeda”; October 7 Terrorist Infiltrates the U.S., and His Wife Raised Funds to Bring Him Over! 10/3/2026

This episode mainly discusses the latest investigation progress into the attempted Dubai hijacking and terrorist attack, pointing out that the co-pilot of the hijacked flight, Maham Mahami, has a Syrian background and is suspected of being influenced by extremism and Al-Qaeda ideology. It also discloses inside information about terrorists involved in the October 7 massacre infiltrating the United States and raising funds online. Additionally, it analyzes South Korea's investment in Alaska energy projects, Trump's exclusive interview with Time magazine regarding Iran and the Middle East situation, and the propaganda strategy behind the Wall Street Journal's hype surrounding Xi Jinping's health.

Video link:

Full text:

Hello everyone, welcome to today's Lude Media Dr. Yan program on October 3, 2026. Let's take a look at what news we have today. Even though it's Saturday, there is still a lot of information to bring you. Especially after the attempted hijacking and terrorist attack, a series of investigations are in full swing, right? Every day there is a lot of new information about the background of this hijacker and what kind of person he is. Fortunately, these hijackers did not die, so now many things can be investigated through interrogating him, which is much easier than if the whole plane had crashed or if a 9/11-style terrorist attack had succeeded. Otherwise, you would have to first investigate why the plane went down and what exactly happened.

Where is the black box, right? That would be a huge trouble. Before we talk about this terrorist attack, let's first show you that Lee Jae-myung, who everyone loves to hate, is causing trouble again. Anyway, we've been mentioning him these past few days, right? Because he has been busy racking his brains to help Xi cause trouble over there. What happened today? It's mainly about what happened a couple of days ago.

It is said that Trump announced that South Korea will invest $200 billion to advance the liquefied natural gas pipeline project in Alaska. And this is said to be an energy project that will last for decades, a major project. Trump officially announced it on September 30. Trump said this is one of the largest energy projects in American history, and it is very effective in creating local jobs in Alaska and saving energy costs, right? This is part of the $350 billion investment plan previously reached between South Korea and the United States, and it is a major project that accounts for half of it, right? So Trump said, I am very happy to announce this investment reached with South Korea, and then here.

Inside, the investment targets include 6-gigawatt scale power generation facilities in Texas, eight large nuclear power units within the United States, and this Alaska liquefied natural gas pipeline project. Then he specifically mentioned that South Korea alone is going to invest $5 billion in this liquefied natural gas project, and the total investment is up to $200 billion. The Alaska part of the entire energy sector should account for $50 billion, and Lutnick also confirmed this news.

And then? Trump said, look, South Korea is investing hundreds of billions of dollars in the United States as part of a trade agreement, so in return, we will lower their tariffs to 15%. Otherwise, this Alaska project and the entire energy project are very large in scale, right? It is difficult to raise funds easily. Also, Trump said at the White House press conference that after completion, it will supply 113 million cubic meters of natural gas every day, which will bring the United States to an unrivaled level.

This project itself involves taking natural gas from the northernmost part of Alaska, transporting it through a 1,300-kilometer pipeline to the southern region, liquefying it, and then shipping it to Asia. The entire project is estimated to cost between $45 billion and $55 billion. If South Korea were to cover almost all of the investment, remember what we discussed earlier regarding the content published in the KORUS FTA? You provide the money, but the U.S. decides how it is spent, right? It is impossible for you to invest money and then be able to insert your own people or infiltrate; that is not how it works. The U.S. wants to maintain control over national security.

Regarding investment decision-making power, South Korea actually signed that agreement thinking they could play the same game as Zhu Rongji, right? "Let's sign it first, and then how we handle it afterward is our business, right? We just won't implement it, we'll drag it out, we'll argue with them, we'll negotiate with them," and so on.

They want to drag out the time! The Lee Jae-myung administration certainly cannot be thinking, "I'll invest money in the U.S., and I won't even have any control over it, and then I'll just be good to the U.S.? How would I answer to my boss, Xi Jinping, back home?" Is that what it means? So, before the entire UN General Assembly, South Korea specifically sent people to meet with people like Utnik and Rubio, right? To discuss, "Oh, this investment, I don't really want to give it, can I not give it, or what?"

So, Trump announcing this is equivalent to saying, "You, Lee Jae-myung, came to the UN General Assembly, you met with Trump, and your own business and trade people have also met with our people, so this matter should be settled." That is why Trump announced it, right? Moreover, this project can create over 10,000 jobs in Alaska and also reduce annual energy costs for households. Trump is very happy about this, right? The problem is that while Trump happily announced this, South Korea...

They did not commit to it. South Korea immediately started saying, "Oh, we didn't view this as a confirmed investment." The implication is that they still have to go through the National Assembly and do other things. For the past two days, news has been coming out of South Korea saying, "We don't acknowledge it." It means they haven't made a final decision yet. It is just like a couple of weeks ago when the U.S. said that the South Korean military would participate in peacekeeping in the Strait of Hormuz, and Lee Jae-myung's side immediately jumped out and said, "No, that's not right, I'm not participating. We haven't discussed this yet, we can't send troops there."

Do you see? The Lee Jae-myung administration is now truly terrified that the U.S. might not understand what his true colors are, right? We said yesterday that the Congress even wrote a letter to Rubio saying, "You need to carefully consider whether South Korea is really our ally, right?" If it really doesn't work out, it means the Lee Jae-myung administration should be investigated, and we should look at the secrets behind him and expose them. Why let him keep jumping around? So, here today.

This reporter, well, it was yesterday, the reporter went to ask Trump, right? Because yesterday Trump specifically posted on Truth Social again, confirming this matter once more, saying, "I am pleased to announce that the agreement with the Republic of Korea is getting better and better. $8.4 billion will be used for a project to improve oil recovery to produce more oil and natural gas. This means the United States will achieve energy dominance in the future and ensure global energy security." The reporter went to ask him, "Mr. President, South Korea says they haven't approved the Alaska pipeline project, they are still studying it. Did you announce it prematurely?"

Trump said, "I didn't. I certainly didn't announce it prematurely. They were there themselves and sent representatives. If they don't acknowledge it, then we'll see. If they don't want to do it, it doesn't matter to me. I'll just charge them more money." Look at how interesting Trump's answer is! Is it just a matter of charging a little more money? Think about it, if South Korea plays games and goes back on its word regarding this trade agreement, do you believe the U.S. will raise tariffs by 35% or 40% in a heartbeat? Do you really think the U.S. doesn't have leverage over your Lee Jae-myung administration's anti-American stance? And.

Look at Trump's words, it's actually that I don't care. He already agreed at the time, right? If he has the guts, let him go back and flip the table! Agree to one thing and do another.

The U.S. should just settle the accounts with him however it sees fit. Anyway, after the tariffs are collected, the money coming in will still be in the U.S. Treasury and can still be used to invest in the Alaska energy project, right? And as long as I increase your tariffs, you will still have to beg me to reach a trade agreement. It's just that you say the Lee Jae-myung administration has no cards to play but is still jumping around hard. The more they jump, the more they get slapped in the face, and the more they expose themselves, right? What is he trying to achieve? To put it bluntly, he is just thinking, "I, Lee Jae-myung, at least have until 2029 before my term ends. I'm in office longer than you, Trump. I can't be outplayed by you, Trump." That is what he is thinking—trading time for space. Well, let me tell you, there will definitely be a good show to watch with Lee Jae-myung next. And.

Let's look at this, didn't Trump accept an exclusive interview with Time magazine? The glutinous rice balls team translated many excerpts from Trump's interview, which are very interesting and I'd like to share them with everyone. Right, we didn't greet the audience friends, did we? This third uncle Chen, third uncle Chen should be responding to what our member friend Hongmei, Haomei said earlier about why it seems people in mainland China all like Musk? I don't think the mainland all likes Musk either; frankly speaking, that's still manufactured through propaganda and hype, right? Brainwashed into it. But third uncle Chen answered well, saying mainland people worship Musk because he has power and money, and if he goes bankrupt, mainlanders will turn from fans to passersby.

Is that how it is? Just look at those who simp for him. Oh, what you see here is entirely his glamorous surface, right, fantasizing that one day they too can be like him, right? Actually, what kind of person is Musk really? What? If you really go ask those netizens who shout in their mouths, oh, I worship Musk, let me tell you, the vast majority of them have been brainwashed by the CCP's propaganda, and they don't know what Musk's actual situation is in the US because none of them have ever circumvented the Great Firewall to get out, right? But every time you, Musk, go to China, whether you go or not anyway, the packaging the CCP gives you makes you look very presentable, right? Even praising his dad and mom, his dad over there in Guangzhou surrounded by beauties, with local people.

This—feeling extremely excited about his dad going to some restaurant and trying to piggyback on the clout is truly disgusting enough. To be honest, the CCP just does these kinds of unpresentable things, right? Plus, elevating Musk, don't forget Yang Yang, Chu Jun, right? Whether or not that's biological, anyway, since there's no other son right now, they can only use Yang Yang first. So Yang Yang is inside Musk's system being cultivated there, right? Then later when Musk is elevated to a high status, by the time Yang Yang takes over, Yang Yang's prestige will also be high, isn't that what it means? Ah, so you see.

There's nothing much to overthink! Musk's mask will inevitably slip sooner or later, I'm telling you, actually his mask already more or less slipped last year. Last June when he attacked Trump, ah, let's take a look, right. President Trump said—the reporter asked him, last week you said you might wipe out Iran, that was the word you used at the time. Trump said, yes, very likely. The reporter asked, you've issued similar threats before, but you also said you are a peace president. Trump said, right.

The reporter said, how can a peace president threaten to wipe out an entire nation? Look at how this reporter is switching concepts, right? How is that wiping out an entire nation? What's being wiped out is clearly the dictatorial regime, right? Trump said directly because wiping out Iran can bring peace to the world; with Iran around, I don't think the world can truly achieve peace. The reporter had no choice and said, then are you specifically referring to the government? Is this the Islamic Republic regime or innocent civilians? Hey, isn't he quite well-informed? Why didn't he make it clear when he asked? Trump said over the past few months.

They—meaning this regime—killed 75,000 protesters, innocent ones, many of whom were very good people; they killed 70,000 people, over 70,000, we recorded all of it. They were still lying a few days ago on Breitbart's show, right—that interview by Fox with Pezeshkian, right? At that time Pezeshkian said they only killed 3,000 people, and Breitbart said, are you kidding me? Look, this is making the Iranian president make a fool of himself on Fox, right? Dragging the CCP into the public eye as well so everyone can see, hey, buying Iranian oil and supporting Iran is the CCP, and it's even worse than Iran because it doesn't even give Iran money, right? And then Iran killed so many people, tens of thousands, and it still doesn't admit it.

So that is a massacre, plain and simple. Therefore Trump said, look, we'll wait and see. The reason people aren't rising up to resist right now is because they are afraid of being killed, because when they take to the streets in the end, several thousand people get killed, right? This sometimes a sniper directly shoots straight through the head, including.

500,000 women also took to the streets back then, truly heroic, right? Then the snipers shot right into the exact center of their heads, and when those women saw one after another falling, they desperately fled. So Trump doesn't talk nonsense with you at all; you ask me next, I'll show you that scene—do you want to listen? And look, no matter how left-wing Time magazine is, it still has to present this matter completely, Trump's interview; isn't this equivalent to the dissemination of information? Right? Those lies and whatnot you had before will reveal their true form in front of these facts.

So Trump really knows how to handle these media outlets! Then the reporter asked again, saying in January this year protests appeared on the streets, you said help was on the way, do you regret not entering Iran or launching some kind of operation?

Trump said no, I think we did an exceptionally good job on this matter. Look, so many people died in Vietnam back then, and Afghanistan was the same, endless. I fought two wars—of course, losing even one person is too many. But in my two wars, we only lost 18 people, and one of those wars was Venezuela, and that battle was simply incredible! You say none of those 18 casualties were lost in Venezuela when capturing Maduro, right? That is indeed incredible. Just think about how many US troops died in the Afghanistan and Vietnam battlefields, right? And how many locals died, right, slaughtered by their own regime. Then just think.

Even though 18 U.S. service members lost their lives in the war with Iran, how much of this should actually be blamed on Xi Jinping? The U.S. hasn't even settled accounts with him yet, but this is already on the tab, right?

So Trump now is like, "If you guys want to play word games with me here, I'll give you numbers, and I'll use language to paint vivid pictures for you." Imagine if during a protest, 500,000 Iranian women took to the streets, and sniper bullets struck them right in the forehead, one by one they fell, running and scattering in panic—that really has a strong and shocking sense of imagery, right? So Trump is exceptionally good at dealing with these media outlets. The contrast between him and Xi, who is dry and lacks any lively human presence, is just... an absolute world of difference. Then the reporter continued to ask:

"The last question regarding Iran is about last weekend when you rejected a ceasefire proposal from the Iranian side. Can you tell me why?" Trump said because there are things I wouldn't approve a year ago, and I won't approve them today either. Put bluntly, you—actually, these people coming from Iran to surrender—at least publicly, are they promising conditions to the U.S. and failing to meet American standards based on what's given? But in reality, you don't even know if they signed anything privately, right? Didn't you see Masoud Pezeshkian and Abbas Araghchi returning looking dejected, and then immediately yesterday or the day before, news came out that a hardline, fiercely anti-American Iranian lawmaker had been arrested?

And then, online, people were saying, "Oh my god, is this a pro-American purge starting among the hardliners in Iran?" And you know what the funniest part was? The media of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps came out and said, "This does not mean there is a problem with the hardliners within Iran; this simply proves that the fact that this person was arrested must mean there is an issue with him. His arrest proves that our judicial system is extremely fair and impartial. Hey, whether you are a hardliner or a moderate, anyone with a problem can be arrested. Our judicial system is so incorruptible."

Well, I think playing it this way is quite interesting. Because I've always thought that those hardline media outlets of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps—I clearly remember when the attacks on Ali Khamenei first started, a lot of news already came out that they had been secretly taken over by Israeli and American intelligence agencies, right? Didn't a lot of content openly appearing on their TV stations back then start leaning pro-U.S. and opposing the Revolutionary Guard Corps? Later, for some reason, it seemed like they went back to being hardline every day. Hey, I've been wondering if it's possible that they've already been hollowed out, leaving just an empty shell. On the surface, they let you feel like they are still hardliners, but at the critical moment, they actually end up playing a reverse version of the Nine-Story Ghost Tower. Ah, seeing this news saying that the Revolutionary Guard Corps' media heavily praised the arrest of this hardline lawmaker—and this lawmaker reportedly had a pretty high profile over the past two years, constantly popping up to say America should be killed off, Israel shouldn't exist, and terrorists are doing a great job. Well, now that he has been arrested, the Revolutionary Guard Corps says this shows how incorruptible our system is, and you shouldn't criticize us. It's quite interesting, hey, this kind of incorruptibility is quite amusing.

Anyway, Trump just said—the reporter asked him, "Can you give an example regarding this matter of failing to reach an agreement?" Trump said, "My point is, they proposed opening the strait, and that is already part of the content, not the whole thing, but it's not good enough, far from it." Obviously, this is another one of Trump's evasive and brushed-off answers, right? Meaning, hey, why are you asking for such details? Can I tell you everything? Otherwise, how can I say what was actually discussed and signed? We have no way of knowing right now; everyone is guessing—the CCP is guessing, we are guessing, right? Let's see who guesses correctly. Then the reporter asked again:

"Will you step up the bombing after the midterms? There are reports about this." And Trump said, "It's possible." The reporter asked, "Are you considering doing so?" Trump said, "I can't tell you." Look, you are practically asking me where I plan to bomb! See that? I told you Trump was just toying with this reporter. Every question gets an answer, but this rapid-fire Q&A leaves no leaks, and besides, whatever you say is possible, right? Just go ahead and guess. Then all sorts of things—including fake news and getting media outlets to probe—are just attempts to make Trump spill some details. Trump just sits there saying, "Maybe, maybe." When pressed hard, Trump says, "I won't tell you. Don't you think I see what you're asking me? You're just asking me when and where I plan to strike so you can run away ahead of time. I'm certainly not going to tell you!" So I think watching Trump answer questions is extremely interesting! You can imagine, right? If the enemy's side is scratching their heads trying to figure out how to crack such a tough nut, isn't it just too interesting?

And especially now online, aren't there always these fake news stories starting this or that kind of information warfare? Insisting on claiming that Benjamin Netanyahu had prior knowledge before the October 7 massacre and did nothing—that kind of story is obviously a fabrication. I'm telling you, just like this plane hijacking incident, it couldn't possibly be as the CCP and Iran claim, saying this hijacking was a pre-arranged, self-directed act, claiming the landing data of the hijacking was fake, or that the matter of the terrorists was fake? People are still alive, the black boxes are intact right now, and several countries are currently studying this matter together.

Oh, just based on your word alone, especially isn't there that American big pro-CCP shill online? What's the name of that guy who openly went to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) country, sang praises for Xi, and stood in front of Chairman Mao's portrait to give a speech and salute? I suddenly forgot his name. There are a lot of people chasing after him on Douyin, and the CCP pushed tens of millions of followers for him. That's the guy who took the lead online these few days, frame-by-frame analyzing the so-called hijacking video, insisting on picking faults with things inside, for example, claiming a certain cup of water still looks like it's in the cup, or these internal footage of the aircraft taken by passengers after the hijacking incident was suppressed and before the landing, before the emergency landing. He must nitpick and say, 'Oh, look, there is still water in this cup, which shows it couldn't have been a hijacking just now. And what about this data, it's totally impossible. If it dropped thousands of meters within tens of seconds, the Boeing could not possibly hold up; it would have disintegrated long ago.' With the way they play this game, you know the moment you look at it.

It's a lot like back then—why else would I say these are all things I experienced firsthand, and I understand too well how they play this game? Like when I went to Fox for my first interview, they interviewed me for four hours, and there were witnesses present, lawyers present, and so on. Then when I went on the program, they broadcasted thirteen minutes of it. The first time, July 20, 2020, during that documentary, fake anti-communists like Gong Xiaoxia and others put on a serious act, including some so-called Tiananmen human rights figures in the U.S., one by one saying in those media outlets, 'Oh, Limeng Yan's video looks fake at a glance.' They said Fox has never interviewed people like that, saying that at a glance she was reading from a script, that it looked like a fake interview put together, and that Fox wouldn't have given her a four-hour interview. And I remember one thing particularly vividly, at that time Gong Xiaoxia said something like, because she came from VOA, she understood how American media works, she knew what interviews are like, so she swore up and down that Limeng Yan's Fox interview was absolutely fake.

And then, being so shameless, do you see it clearly? The CCP's agents all show their cloven hooves at times like this. Just like that American pro-CCP shill I just mentioned, right? Taking the lead online, analyzing on Twitter about how things are, saying the video here is fake—hey, the person who took the video is still alive. Plus, as we've all said, that Boeing airplane incident precisely shows that no one would dare to plot such a false flag operation; it can only be described as a divine miracle, right? Who would dare to plan for an airplane to plunge rapidly under those circumstances, and then pull some control lever to make it recover balance? Who would dare? And besides, look at the examples they cite online, like the passengers' cups, this video showing a cup on the feet, that transparent cup, like those big Jelly Fun boxes, where there's still water inside, saying the water didn't even spill.

Some people online directly rebuffed them, saying, 'Look closely, that is water distributed to everyone after the plane experienced the hijacking, to help them calm their nerves.' And because I've actually drunk that kind of water, it's the one commonly used by Emirates Airlines, because perhaps their boiled water and purified water are precious, so it's not like what we have on China Eastern or others where they just push the water cart out and hand it directly to you whenever. If you want to drink beverages up there, your choices might actually be a bit more diverse. If you want water, they just give you that kind of small-packaged purified water, like a large Jelly Fun box, and there's a lid on top that you have to peel off to drink. So there you go.

Just like that, with the lid not even peeled off, you only see the transparent shell and say, 'Why didn't the water spill?' Just tell me, these people fighting this propaganda war here, isn't it just repeatedly showing all the intelligence agencies around the world: Look, we are fighting a propaganda war, and we are just this shameless, right? Telling bold-faced lies. But why do they do this? They are panicked, aren't they?

Right? Just like from October 7 until now, coming up on three years, and unexpectedly there's another wave of massive propaganda claiming—still with mainstream media sources coming out and swearing up and down—that on October 7, Netanyahu knew about this terrorist attack and deliberately did nothing. Implying that Hamas's massacre doesn't count as a thing, and Netanyahu is the one who should be held accountable.

Trump was directly asked about this by a Time magazine reporter, who said there were continuous reports that Netanyahu had received warnings before October 7 about a possible attack. Trump directly said, 'This is the first time I'm hearing about this today.' The reporter said, 'You have access to the highest-level intelligence.' Trump said, 'Are you saying Netanyahu knew in advance? Well, I can't imagine that.' Trump's point was, anyway, even at the highest level I've never heard of it, whose mouth on earth did you hear that from? I can't guarantee whether it's true or false, right?

Then you see the reporter asking relentlessly, saying, yes, Egypt warned Netanyahu, and the UAE warned him too—these all came from those fake news stories. In fact, the UAE itself has denied it, saying no such words were spoken. President Trump said, I don't think so; I feel that if he knew, he definitely would have taken action, or at least had people raise their alert level. He couldn't possibly forget a thing like that; that would be a terrifying thing overall. Then you see Trump strike back directly, saying, Oh, those far-left people even deny the things that happened on that day—now that is quite terrible.

Look at that, did you see? This particular reporter insisted on bringing up these fake stories to ask questions. Just think, if this hijacking attempt had succeeded, wouldn't it have happened precisely on a flight between the UAE and Israel? First of all, it certainly would have caused a lot of diplomatic misunderstandings between the two sides. Then during this process, look, including the earlier foreshadowing of fake news claiming Netanyahu knew ahead of time about October 7, I saw some of it too—it basically focused on saying the UAE knew, that some UAE, what's-his-name, the UAE crown prince or someone called Netanyahu or someone and kept reminding him, saying, oh, there might be a Hamas attack recently. And that Netanyahu didn't take it seriously. First of all, let's say, being warned that Hamas might make trouble doesn't mean you can magically know that a massacre of this scale would happen on October 7. Hamas making trouble is just a regular occurrence, right?

And another point, you say if this hijacking had ultimately turned into a 9/11 and proceeded as planned, then the relationship between Israel and the UAE would now have a lot of unexpected complications cropping up in the middle. Coupled with the pre-laid groundwork of so-called internal information from the UAE stating it was confirmed this was told to Netanyahu, and then Netanyahu's side saying I clearly never received any such news—look, isn't this maliciously trying to tear apart the relationship between Israel and the UAE?

Right? So Trump's answer was extremely clever; not only did he avoid falling into the trap, but he also said directly, "Hey, don't you far-left people all deny it? How come now it's turned around into—this event did happen, but you, Netanyahu, deliberately ignored it and you're responsible? So do you admit this event happened or not? If you admit it, shouldn't you first admit that it was a terrorist attack? Right? So look." Trump once again cleverly deflected the ball back.

Then regarding the UAE, we talked about it yesterday, right? The UAE has already determined that this was a terrorist attack. Then this morning's news also showed that the UAE released the name and identity of the hijacker. Hey, these are all things we were asking before: What's his name anyway? Why won't they release it? The hijacker should be in the hands of the UAE now. Today, the UAE deputy prime minister specifically went to visit the hero captain, the Indian-origin captain Mahesh Kumar, who is currently receiving medical treatment in the UAE.

This news was deliberately released, looking good, he's recovering well, right? This deputy prime minister specially posted, saying: "I visited Captain Smith... Mahesh Kumar. This Fly Dubai pilot displayed the highest degree of courage, sense of responsibility, and appreciation for life. Whether it is us or the nation's leadership, we extend our highest affirmation and praise to him. We are proud that he is part of our team, he is part of our country's story, and he is part of the values represented by the UAE: a country full of care, a country of peace, a country that values life." Look, the UAE is also very good at using the media now to shape its image of loving peace, loving life, and humanitarianism. Although it is, to put it bluntly, quite dictatorial, right? You really can't call the UAE all that democratic, but at least among these conservative Islamic countries, they are now moving closer to Western civilization, right?

And this wave of PR, look, from initially not daring to directly mention a terrorist attack, to now not only admitting it's a terror attack and publishing the hijacker's name, but also promising to investigate to the end—and this wave of visits and PR, no matter what else, first of all, it immediately mended the relationship between Israel and the UAE that someone behind the scenes had been racking their brains to ruin over the past few days or this recent period, as I just mentioned. At least look, on this matter, they are already on the same position, right? Hey, look at how much respect they showed this captain, repeatedly emphasizing values and so on; everyone feels reassured hearing it, and the official statements have all been put in place.

Then today, Netanyahu once again issued a statement regarding the hijacking. He said he also had a conversation with this captain. And he specifically told the captain that you are a hero to Israel, India, and the whole world. He said he invited him—he said he invited Modi to come to Israel's Independence Day to light a flame. And he said during the conversation, including how Modi had asked Mahesh Kumar at the time how this all started, right? Mahesh Kumar revealed many new details.

You can see here, taking this opportunity, right? Not only did Netanyahu once again pay his respects to this Indian-origin pilot, but he also elevated this incident to the level of a global hero. It is no longer just about being a hero in Dubai or Israel; it is an honor for India. He has now elevated this to the level of countering terrorist attacks, and now the whole world has to take sides again. Do you see it clearly? Let's just say when the US mentioned that a terrorist attack almost happened at Fairford, it was actually about observing how countries take sides, especially focusing on how the UK would react.

And this failed terrorist attack is also an opportunity to take sides! Look at how Netanyahu is striking while the iron is hot, pulling India and the UAE into this, you see how far it has gone. Because this incident is indeed, how could it be a simple hijacking, right? Not to mention the CCP calling it a "scuffle." To put it bluntly, do they think it's like aunties at a vegetable market grabbing eggs and pulling each other's hair? Is that how you describe it? If this matter had not been handled well at that critical moment, you wouldn't know what this powder keg of Middle Eastern geopolitics would have turned into. Moreover, every country would have been overwhelmed by this, and terrorists would definitely have been as excited as if they had been injected with adrenaline. You wouldn't know if there were many backup echelons waiting in the wings; if he had succeeded in this attack, the ones following would have gone crazy, driving planes to cause trouble. You have no idea how crazy it could have gotten. It's just that this incident was stopped, so there should be many subsequent ones, whether they were just watching and stopped, or were directly tracked down by intelligence agencies. At least everything we see currently is still very stable. Thank goodness, thank goodness! So Netanyahu attaching such importance to this matter is also a very strong signal.

Alright, what more do we know about this hijacker today? First, we know he is an Omani citizen, 29 years old, named Maham Mahami, not Hamam Hamami. And this person has a Syrian background, so it is related to the radicalization influence of Al-Qaeda in Syria. Let's look at yesterday's report, which the "sticky rice balls" (netizens) translated. It says that Muhammad Hamam Hamami was found to be in possession of extremist materials in 2024 while serving as a co-pilot trainee in Oman, and he was identified as a security risk at that time. Furthermore, from 2024 to 2025, he frequently browsed extremist websites and, when talking to colleagues, expressed support for ISIS jihad and opposition to non-Muslims—that is, he expressed support for rhetoric opposing all infidels.

Alright, now the news says that although Oman Air sensitively detected this at the time and stopped him from flying, they still kept him in an administrative position. Later, for some reason, he was hired last year without a background check. Look, this description now actually looks very much like, from a counter-intelligence perspective, this person...

This person's extremist tendencies were spotted by someone, right? Someone thought this person was good and useful, so while he was at Oman Air, even though he was transferred to an administrative post, through people within Flydubai, the forces behind him, you know? They recruited him directly. Because to be honest, if he wanted to carry out a 9/11-style attack against Israel from Oman, he couldn't really do it due to the lack of diplomatic relations, right? So you see, it feels like after this person was targeted and seen as truly capable, he was directly selected to execute this mission, and then he was put into Flydubai for eight months, and then the hijacking happened. It is said his mother is of Syrian descent, and sources say that this Hamami was previously influenced by the radical ideology of a Turkish-backed, Al-Qaeda-linked group inside Syria, and even participated in battles against the Assad regime. So, it's not that the enemy of my enemy is always my friend; he doesn't like Assad, but he is not a good person either, right?

Then in May 2026, he traveled to Turkey. In August, he also went to Pakistan. So Pakistan, let me tell you, the US cannot trust them that much. Including Turkey, this is also a case of holding them while suppressing them. It is reported that his diary contains praise for multiple terrorists, including Osama bin Laden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and this Masood Azhar, a whole bunch of them. And then, there is a page that is believed to be the hijacker's personal online profile, which briefly shows that he once studied aviation management at a university in the UK and also studied engineering at a university in Australia. I have to say, these Commonwealth countries are easy to get into. Once you go, whether it's remote learning or in-person, they don't do background checks anyway; they are very "loving." Look at that, isn't it? We will have more detailed introductions for you later. Look at this introduction first.

Regarding this school in the UK, it is said to be Buckinghamshire New University; I have never heard of this name either. It was previously said that he completed a three-year distance learning course, studying online, and obtained a degree in aviation management. It is said that he did not receive pilot training there. As for that school in Australia, they just refused to answer questions directly; they were hiding there, acting very cowardly.

Alright, and at the same time, other news has emerged here, saying that on his LinkedIn profile, there were two posts that were published. Moreover, it is said that these two posts were pre-scheduled for this hijacking and crash, because you see, the time between the hijacking and the crash was very short, and nine hours after this incident occurred, suddenly, it appeared that these two posts had been set to be published automatically, popping up from his LinkedIn profile. Later, these two posts were deleted. Of course, it is currently under investigation; it is also possible that they were not scheduled posts, but rather that his LinkedIn was directly controlled by some people, right? That is, after he scheduled this hijacking incident, these people manually posted them and then manually deleted them; either way, it is possible. It is said that when these two posts popped up on his LinkedIn at the time, one of them contained a series of videos inside the cockpit of the same Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft.

Ah, one of the clips, which CNN determined through geolocation was filmed at Dubai International Airport. It is said that the person filming at the time, who is unknown, moved the lens close to and aimed it at a 737 MAX 8 belonging to El Al Israel Airlines, right? Look, another MAX 8, another Israeli aircraft, and in Dubai; these key points match up. It feels like they were deliberately leaving signals, right? Then, it is said that the flight number shown in the cockpit in the video was OMA624, dated October 11, 2023. This flight corresponds to a flight that usually flies from Dubai to Muscat, the capital of Oman, and this date also coincides with his time working at Oman Air. Wow, this is quite magical, isn't it? This cockpit belongs to an Israeli airline, an Israeli airline flight from Dubai to Muscat. Why would this person have these internal cockpit details when he was at Oman Air? There is this video, so who exactly filmed it? Right? He wasn't even there at that time. If it really is an unedited video filmed in 2023 of such a flight, then it shouldn't have been filmed by him personally. So who filmed it and gave it to him? Why film this segment? Why does this segment happen to contain the keywords for the mission he was about to execute, right? And then it is said, and it just happens to be a flight to Muscat, which means this Israeli flight from Dubai to Muscat—could it be connected to this Hamami, who was serving as an Oman Air pilot in Muscat at the time, right? There are many things here that need careful investigation. Then it is said that the video also contains other content filming El Al Israel Airlines and another Israeli airline aircraft. Finally, the video ends with two photos: one is a person named Ayman al-Zawahiri, who took over Al-Qaeda after Bin Laden's death. The other photo is of a person named Humam al-Balawi, who killed nine people in a 2009 suicide attack, including seven CIA officers and contractors, a person who pledged allegiance to Al-Qaeda.

This is the second post within the first post, which is accompanied by an AI-generated image. The image contains the three holy sites of Islam: Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem, and there is a continuous glowing trajectory connecting them. In the background, there is a poem with a sense of resistance, telling of refusing humiliation, not fearing death, and defending dignity. Look, if this hijacking had occurred, and if everyone didn't know what was going on at the time, what exactly happened in the cockpit, and then a 9/11-style terrorist act became a fait accompli, then this post that popped up, everyone would think, surely it would be, wow, everyone is shocked by a 9/11-style attack, and then suddenly someone seems to have come out to claim it, and then following the clues, it leads to the co-pilot, right?

And there are so many, many details here, I will let you all take a look at this. Look, this is the report I found from the Jerusalem Post in Israel; there are also some other details here. It says here, when reporters went to interview the spokesperson from the UAE, they were unwilling to talk specifically about what stage the investigation is at now. However, because various pieces of information are constantly emerging now, right? This person, Israeli officials have now confirmed to reporters that this terrorist, Hamami, was born in the UAE. Just now we said his mother has a Syrian background; now there is more information confirming that his father has an Omani background, so it is said that he has no other nationality; his nationality is Omani.

Well, and then it says here that he had previously lived in the UAE for many years. That is to say, anyway, those Gulf countries are all quite small, right? Moving back and forth and all that. And then now, Netanyahu has already confirmed, and investigations show that the hijacker has already admitted that he indeed harbored the intention of a suicide attack. As for what exactly happened, it hasn't been made public yet, as the investigation is still ongoing. Then it says the hijacker also told investigators that the intended location and destination he originally planned to crash the hijacked plane into was indeed inside Israeli territory. This is why the hijacking took place right on the border between Saudi Arabia and Israel at the time.

Well, and then, on this side, this is an investigation by the New York Post, right? The investigation by the New York Post also included a lot of messages and photos that the terrorist, the co-pilot Hamami, posted on social media. To be honest, if you just look at this photo, this 29-year-old terrorist looks like he's smiling and amiable, right? It doesn't seem like he's some kind of ferocious extremist. For example, this morning many non-member viewers happened to catch it because we had a slight issue in the backstage, and the members' program was temporarily made available for non-members to watch as well. Everyone should have seen what I talked about this morning regarding that New York Times gaming department head whose 70-something-year-old Chinese-American parents-in-law were executed in a shooting. That elderly Chinese-American father-in-law, looking at them, they really had looks that were murderous, right? With that fierce, fleshy look on their faces. Hey, but he really doesn't look like a hijacker, right? But you can't say, upon seeing this photo of him looking all proper in human clothing, that you assume he's a good person. Wow, there's a lot of related content published here, and I'll go through it with you, there are so many details.

It says, first of all, that although the hijacking didn't succeed, today al-Qaeda has started to step forward—not that they are claiming responsibility, saying, "Oh, this is our organization's," not quite. Al-Qaeda, in their latest weekly magazine released this week—wait, not today, yesterday, local time yesterday Friday—yes, al-Qaeda now also plays the civilized game, launching their own weekly magazine this July. This weekly is called Al Bayn, and the content released by this weekly this week includes a call from al-Qaeda asking for Americans on planes to be targeted for attacks. That is specifically what the content of their weekly is. The New York Post cited it, look, they put up photos of 9/11 back then, praising 9/11 and also praising the terrorist behind this attempted hijacking, meaning, oh, 9/11 was a successful one, today's one wasn't successful, but we call for keeping up the good work, eventually one will succeed. Moreover, further digging into this hijacker revealed that on his previous social media, including Twitter, he had even shared a photo with an al-Qaeda leader. This is not simple at all, right? The more you look, the less simple it is.

It says in this article that this al-Qaeda weekly stated that although Wednesday's hijacking incident didn't succeed, the war is not over. Furthermore, the planes of Zionists, Americans, and all other infidels fighting against Islam are still flying in the skies and can still become targets of attack, just like what happened on 9/11 and September 30th. So I say, you supporting these extremists with the Chinese Communist Party is absolute! You say Xi's brain isn't working well, his brain really isn't working well! Ah, here, all of these things from the Chinese Communist Party of yours—no matter how good you are to them, you are still equivalent to an infidel. You say, "I am not fighting a war with them." Are you kidding me? In their eyes, you shouldn't even have these resources, because you don't believe in their Allah, right? When you are competing with them for the remaining resources—when all the other enemies in the world that they consider your common enemies are gone—then when they look at you, you are the enemy, because you are an infidel, and you are competing with them for water resources, air resources, a whole series of resources. So to actually help these terrorists grow powerful, you say Xi's brain... counting on him to lead the Chinese Communist Party and this whole group of people, right? All these quasi-terrorists whose minds are hijacked by cults, if they keep going like this, can the world still have a future? Can the United States not destroy them? You tell me, isn't that right?

It says in here, this article was inciting, saying, you know, you use your blood to write the glory of our nation. You see, the nation, right? The word nation is almost being ruined. Saying, these are the fruits very close to a holy war, the evil empire America will perish, and how and what? This publication was still published on the Teddy Graham channel. That is, now, do you remember a couple of days ago I said counter-terrorism experts have already said to be careful of al-Qaeda making a comeback. But now you see my title also says suspected of being related to al-Qaeda, not saying that al-Qaeda itself orchestrated it inside. Including al-Qaeda has not publicly claimed responsibility for this matter yet, right? Actually, now counter-terrorism experts also told the New York Post. It makes people feel that al-Qaeda wants to use this matter, just like 9/11 was done by them previously, and this terrorist is also related to al-Qaeda, right? It doesn't mean al-Qaeda must have given money, materials, and effort. You must know, al-Qaeda now has such great capability, tossing back and forth between Oman, the UAE, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, and especially including what we call The New York Times, the BBC, all this series of CNN, this title is called altercation, all calling it quarrels, conflicts, disputes.

Al-Qaeda, let's be honest, putting its name on it, we feel it's reasonable. But you say, everything inside was orchestrated by them alone, with money and people, what's impossible? If al-Qaeda could still be this rampant twenty-five years after 9/11, with nothing else behind it, then the whole world would have wiped it out long ago. I'm telling you, right? So this matter now, counter-terrorism experts also feel that al-Qaeda, although not dead, is already in a very difficult situation. They just have been talking for the past twenty-five years about continuing to kill America, continuing to launch attacks to defeat the enemy, a bit like that Xiang林嫂 concept, right? Except Xianglin's wife was the victim, and this side is the perpetrator, just winning once and talking about it endlessly without stopping? That kind of vibe. Well, of course, they say this guy is indeed a member of al-Qaeda, should be a supporter, I don't know how loyal he is, I don't know, but he does support it. For example, these are some of the contents he posted, including this one. Let me show you, up here is al-Qaeda bragging about him, saying that's our brother or something. Well, we won't worry about that. This terrorist, the co-pilot of the hijacking, posted a series of things on the internet. In here, for example, let me show you, Teddy Graham, uh, Teddy Graf, this The Daily Telegraph published a long piece. Hey, can't this, this be opened?

Can't open it doesn't matter, it's just this article from The Daily Telegraph, which talks a lot about various remarks previously published by the co-pilot of the hijacking. I'll go through it for everyone in a moment, it looks very shocking. Then by the way, let me show you, didn't we just say that after Bin Laden died, there was a guy in al-Qaeda named Ayman al-Zawahiri whom this Hawrami seems to very much like, frequently posting related content? Who is this Zawahiri? It's this person.

He is actually an Egyptian, he was the leader of al-Qaeda after Osama bin Laden, and he belongs to al-Qaeda, should be one of its founders, and this person is not uncultured, he is an ophthalmologist, and an ophthalmic surgeon, and he very actively studies traditional Islamic doctrines, and is proficient in multiple languages, like English, French, and Arabic. There was once a bounty of twenty-five million dollars on him, this person is actually dead now, but he lived until July 2022.

He was killed by a US military drone in a safe house in Kabul, Afghanistan. Speaking of this, I must tell you, do you remember when I talked to you about al-Qaeda yesterday and the day before, I said that many of al-Qaeda's forces are still in Pakistan and Afghanistan, right? Hey, look at this second-in-command of al-Qaeda, the second leader, who lived so many years longer than Bin Laden. When he was finally killed, it was in Kabul. Although the Taliban said they were not clear why he was here and just wanted to investigate.

However, Kabul, Afghanistan in July 2022 was already the world of the Taliban, and it is a Taliban government recognized by the Chinese Communist Party. The CCP was the first to establish diplomatic relations, the only one in the whole world, controlling this Taliban government it recognizes. Ah, then under this circumstance, Kabul the capital, in this safe house, Zawahiri was hiding there. Oh, you say behind this, the Taliban had no idea? Ah, if you say the Chinese Communist Party has no intention to get involved with al-Qaeda, hum, then I wouldn't believe it. Alright, then let's take a look.

This The Daily Telegraph first went to investigate, saying, hey, this guy studied in our UK, studied, remotely, and furthermore, also studied in the Commonwealth's Australia, what is going on here? Hey, they went to investigate, and then, this, this university said, saying, he did a three-year remote aviation management education degree, saying, he got his degree in 2023, saying he was in Oman and didn't come to the UK for classes, and then, this.

As for the university, let's talk about it. We are also willing to go and investigate further to see what happened during his time there. However, the university told reporters that, at least up to this point, they had not received any reports or complaints regarding this individual's extremist tendencies or similar concerns. The question is, is this matter really that simple? Coincidentally, this Buckinghamshire New University was, on the very same day the hijacking occurred, being investigated by the UK. The UK Home Office announced that day that it was suspending the university's license to sponsor international student visas, because some students were actually going to the UK to study. Those graduating in 2023, studying from 2020 to 2023 for three years, happened to coincide with the pandemic. If it hadn't been for the pandemic, this co-pilot might have gone directly to the UK to study, right? So, it is quite a coincidence that the university had its license to sponsor international student visas suspended on the day of the hijacking, because the UK Home Office has become so cautious that they are still very worried about whether these international students you are sponsoring can actually fulfill their sponsorship obligations.

It is said that the Home Office asked the school authorities many questions regarding their past international student recruitment work and so on, but technically, this matter should be unrelated to the hijacking. However, the problem is that the school authorities, in order to defend themselves and claim that they are actually innocent—saying, "I will cooperate with any investigation, but I have done nothing wrong"—specifically told reporters, "Hey, I never received any complaints while this person was studying here."

Look, during the time this person was studying, were there really no extremist remarks? Let me show you; the article reveals long passages of his online posts and such. You might say the school authorities indeed didn't receive any complaints, but does not receiving complaints prove that your international students are normal people and not terrorists? Right? So, here you can see how many loopholes exist in these Commonwealth universities, don't you think?

Well, here it begins to be revealed that he posted a lot of extremist remarks online, and it is said that there is a Twitter account that reporters believe is his, because a lot of personal information matches up. This Twitter account posted over 2,000 posts in less than a year, from December 28, 2021, to August 10, 2022.

Furthermore, the name used was "Pilot" followed by "Al-Hamami"—or rather, "Al-Mohamami"—which is essentially him. Their names are very long; the main part plus "pilot" is his Twitter handle. And throughout those 2,000-plus posts, he stated in various responses and interactions—his interaction rate was very high—that he was a civil aviation pilot from Muscat, Oman, and that his mother was Syrian, all of which matches the co-pilot himself, so it is now believed that this is his personal account. The posts he made during his studies repeatedly endorsed violence against women, advocated for severe punishments according to the strictest Islamic laws, and contained all sorts of insulting and humiliating content; it was very, very extreme. For example, there is a screenshot here from February 24, 2022, which he posted in Arabic.

It seems he was discussing how one should discipline women or one's wife—it probably wasn't about his own wife; he was giving advice to others. He said, "Don't let me be like that man. If I were in that position, if Allah put me in that position, I would put my wife's head under my feet, use her to scrub the floor, make an example of her, and then divorce her." Furthermore, during this same period, he was also expressing support for Russia in the Russia-Ukraine war. How did he put it?

It means that a husband should, when encountering certain situations—for instance, people online were discussing what to do if a wife talks back or doesn't do what the husband says—everyone knows that extremist Muslims can even... you know, Saudi Arabia and such have even held seminars on how to beat one's wife; this is something that has been happening in recent years. And among the advice is that beating is allowed, but don't let others see that you've beaten her, and don't beat her to the point of disability; don't affect her ability to continue doing housework afterward. Yeah, that's fine.

Right? So this guy is clearly the extremist type. He said that a husband should give his wife a slap in advance to prevent trouble before it happens, not giving the wife any chance to get "uppity." He said it's just like Russia slapping Ukraine to make Ukraine readjust its borders. At that time, the Russia-Ukraine war had just begun, right?

So Russia was still very arrogant at that time. And when discussing, for example, if there are other men around this woman—this "other man" doesn't mean there's any scandal; it means if there's another man in the same room as someone's wife, and you can hear his breathing next to her—then it means you have to pin this woman to the ground, step on her head, and make her life miserable.

Oh my god! I mean, I found that in many of his posts, it’s as if when he talks about women, women are not only not human beings, but they are objects whose heads must be stepped on with a foot and rubbed into the ground, and whom he beats every day—completely, utterly devoid of any humanity.

Right? And then? Then on the internet, they say he also commented on others, discussing how when some men are dissatisfied with things their wives have done, but don't take any substantive violent action, he says, well, anyone else would definitely make an example of them! A man who refuses to beat his wife is a coward and a despicable villain. And he said that among them—I guess this British reporter was also dumbfounded, so he quoted a bunch of posts. One of the posts even mentioned this.

A Syrian, seemingly a Syrian woman, in an online back-and-forth debate said, right? Our Syrian husbands are not like what you think, they don't necessarily beat their wives, saying this is your stereotype. She said she is Syrian herself, and that it's actually Saudi men who often beat their wives. Then, right after that.

The co-pilot directly replied online: "Shut up! I say my own mother is Syrian, and I lived in Syria for seven years. He said Syrian husbands are not as cowardly as you claim! A Syrian man will wake you up with a slap in the morning, and beat you with another slap at night to send you to sleep. He said you get beaten in broad daylight until you see stars, and then you are used to mop the floor—this is the correct way to deal with women like you!" I am truly dumbfounded! Ah!

And furthermore, he also cited that kind of extreme Islamic jurisprudence, saying, right, this is as it should be. Saying it is very obvious here that these people should suffer this kind of punishment, because Islamic jurisprudence is just like this. For example, mentioning that someone was sentenced to five years in prison, he said, he said that the Quran mentions that those who commit crimes should be killed or crucified, and their hands and feet on opposite sides should be cut off. I'm saying it's extremely cruel, ah.

Anyway, after I saw it, I was also—I didn't expect it, no wonder Oman Air couldn't stand his extreme remarks at the time. Oman Air at least has stewardesses, right? There are also women and men working together. So you're saying your co-pilot next to you sees a woman and a man staying together, and you're saying a stewardess and a male passenger are together—can't you hear breathing right next to your ear? Then do you also have to step on this stewardess's head under your foot and use her to mop the floor? Well, then she certainly had to be transferred away from the co-pilot seat, right? But why was she only transferred to an administrative position? And why did she go to Fly Dubai afterwards? Hey, this is what is worth investigating! And besides, uh, saying this.

The Telegraph continues, saying, about this Buckingham New University—what Buckinghamshire New University is it? Teaching aviation courses, right? It says this course has many non-British students, meaning this school also relies heavily on international students paying tuition fees. It says at least 8% of the students last year were non-British students, and most of them came from outside the European Union. So how many of these extremists are still hidden here? Even becoming educated extremists and terrorists after taking the course, you never know, right? This is really, really scary, and this includes The Telegraph specifically mentioning.

This co-pilot's, seemingly, however loyal he should be to Al-Qaeda—I don't know how loyal, but at least an affection or something, right? Various media outlets, including the things he posted, everything is related in all sorts of ways to Al-Qaeda, it's all mentioned. So seeing this, you know that fighting terrorism is a long and arduous task! Right now, with great difficulty several terrorist attacks were foiled, but you can't stop Al-Qaeda or whatever from adding fuel to the fire and taking the opportunity to agitate. Speaking of which, I'm going to show you this, look.

Like Israeli National Security Minister, this is not Katz, what's his name? Ben-Gvir? A few days ago, he specifically released a video. In the video he released himself, the person he was confronting was a Hamas member. This Hamas member wasn't from October 7, this person in the white clothes is a Hamas member who planned two bus bombings in Jerusalem in 1996, resulting in 45 deaths. Ah, at that time, the Israeli National Security Minister said to him: The conditions I am offering you are these, this is not the end, I actually want to execute you.

We don't know what conditions he offered, it should be whether this terrorist cooperates or not, whether he confesses or not, right? After all, this case from 1996 has been 30 years and still hasn't been closed, right? There are more under investigation, so this Minister of National Security said that he was negotiating with this terrorist during the interrogation process. Look at the Israel Defense Forces personnel next to them, fully armed and wearing masks—no joke, if you let a terrorist see your face, even if he stays in prison, he can find a way to leak this news out and ask people outside to human-flesh search these people.

Officials and soldiers, go and human-flesh-search these intelligence personnel and so on, so Israel must be fully prepared in this regard. So he said, look, this security minister said that ever since he was young, he has lived under the shadow of these bombing terror attacks. He has participated in protests and so on. Now he is very glad, as the Minister of National Security, to personally lead this kind of policy, to bring these terrorists to justice. And let me show you, why do I say they emerge endlessly? Look, didn't I talk about it before, during the New Year in Israel, they dug a large tunnel, which was made by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, and then it was blown up, right?

Hey, there are plenty of those tunnels, some have granite, and some don't. The average tunnel doesn't even qualify to have granite. Well, I feel this doesn't much look like granite, this was released by Israel's own Wall Room. Isn't this also just last week? One night in a Palestinian city in the West Bank, a place very close to the Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire line, the Israel Defense Forces there, look, there are photos of it, arrested four suspects allegedly involved in terrorist activities. Then the tunnel in the photo is a 12-meter-deep underground vertical shaft tunnel, and there are two places, and near this vertical shaft there were weapons including M16 rifles.

Rifles, shotguns, pistols, ammunition, and other weapons, ah, then, they went down and searched the whole thing, ah, just like this, Britain unexpectedly, after Netanyahu informed him of the intelligence about a terror attack, the very next day the Labour Government joined over a dozen countries to sanction Israel, sanctioning the products produced by those in the West Bank settlements, hey.

The Palestinian cities in the West Bank are blatantly engaging in terrorist activities like this, and we haven't seen them sanctioned, have we? Ah, such great universal love, right? And you say Hamas has already definitely reached the absolute final days of struggling, even you could say they can't even struggle to 1% of what they used to be, maybe.

Even so, Hamas also has a bunch of terrorists who refuse to yield. So these past few days, the Israel Defense Forces have published a string of names, saying that in Gaza, Hamas's current financial department head, ah, commander, the person who held hostages, hey, including the heads of their currency exchange network, including their snipers, including the commander of the al-Quds Brigades who participated on October 7, as well as commanders of other elite forces, etc., a bunch of people anyway.

All of them have been eliminated! And this still has to continue, so you know about the matter of terrorists, today we are actually dedicating an episode to tell everyone, letting everyone see, that for these terrorists, the moment you show them any universal love, I tell you, they will die with everlasting regret, truly! That is definitely Master Dongguo. Alright, here let's talk about it, not only is Hamas in the Middle East, nor only in Europe, the United States guards quite strictly.

Unexpectedly, there was a terrorist who participated in the October 7 massacre, actually, accurately speaking, he is not from Hamas, he is from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), ah, an old friend of the Chinese Communist Party's another organization, which is also currently designated as a terrorist organization by the US. The US says all eight are terrorist organizations, right? This guy was designated after Rubio took office.

A member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, but definite evidence and intelligence showed that he participated in the October 7 Gaza massacre, and he actually entered the US and stayed there for at least a year or more before being arrested! Ah, this person inside the red circle is him, this is the photo from the day of October 7 itself.

And in here, ah, this is him holding a gun, this should also be a picture related to October 7, these were all released by the indictment. What is the deal with this person? He was, at the time of October 7, not among the first batch of Hamas attackers, but he was after Hamas launched the onslaught, when news came back, hey, when the subsequent terrorists needed to follow up, he was in the second wave, the third wave at that time, later that day, as a Palestinian terrorist, coordinating a large crowd of armed terrorists who followed behind to participate in the massacre, ah, so, later on the day of October 7, because the massacre was in the morning, a bit later that day, this terrorist, what should he be called, how is his name pronounced? Called Al-Mutadi, maybe called Mutadi. Anyway, this Mutadi's cell phone already appeared in a cell phone tower near the massacre. And on that day in that place, sixty-two residents, at least four of whom were US citizens, were killed, and even though this person is not a Hamas member, he lived in Gaza all his life, understand? He just joined another terrorist organization in Gaza, actually the nature of it is all the same, right? Just like the various factions of the Red Guards.

How did he get to the United States? In March 2024, he left Gaza and arrived in Egypt. It is obvious that he fled when the Israeli military was conducting clearing operations. Then, in Egypt, he applied for a U.S. visa in June 2024. During this process, he claimed that he had never participated in any paramilitary organization and had never taken part in any terrorist attacks. At that time in 2024, the Biden administration's visa approval process seemed very lax, right? So, three months later, he obtained a visa and entered the United States. To be honest, people from the CCP's China don't necessarily get visas as smoothly as he did. Well, after entering the U.S., he started sharing photos. These photos were extensively published in the indictment after his arrest. Among them, there were photos of him holding a gun and loading it, or playing with guns with a very young child who was likely his own. Moreover, these photos were taken in the apartment where he lived in Oklahoma. The CCP also has significant influence in Oklahoma. Many of these United Front activities and people doing the CCP's dirty work are gathered there.

Well, it wasn't until October 2025 that he was arrested. Throughout 2025, after he entered the U.S., he not only posted on social media, but he even moved to Louisiana and worked at a local restaurant there. In other words, if you didn't know, you might think he was just a normal person who looked a bit serious, perhaps a refugee with an Arab background, or a cook, right? You wouldn't know he was a terrorist. That's why I have to say again, go watch those Foda Foda episodes where these plots are revealed; it's truly terrifying. He was arrested on October 17 last year. It was said he was 33 at the time of his arrest, though it's unclear if that's his real age. When he was arrested, the indictment was released, containing many photos. It specifically mentioned that, according to the charges, he was a member of the military branch of the Pakistan Liberation Democratic Front—or whatever we just mentioned—and this military branch had its own name, called the 'Martyr Brigade.' Do you hear that? These are the people who are ready to become human bombs at any moment! Well, the headquarters of this 'Martyr Brigade' is in Gaza, you understand? So, there are many brother organizations of Hamas, etc. And this Mutadi, after learning that Hamas had launched an invasion, took many people across the border into Israel to coordinate with Hamas in terrorist attacks. The criminal complaint stated that his mobile phone signal was located at a cell tower near the site of the massacre in Israel. Furthermore, it specifically pointed out that everything you have—whether your relationship with this 'Martyr Brigade' or Hamas, etc.—was not truthfully disclosed when you applied for your visa to enter the country, which is why he was arrested.

Well, after he was arrested, this matter didn't really have a follow-up because our program hadn't covered it, as it wasn't a major news story when it first broke, right? The problem is that more information has been exposed later. For example, there was a detail in his indictment stating that his mobile phone signal was located on October 7th. Later, the FBI disclosed a transcript of a call. The initial indictment said that on the morning of October 7th, at 6:34 AM local time, social media showed that after Hamas carried out the massacre, he immediately responded to Hamas's armed call—that 'Al-Aqsa Flood' thing or whatever. The call transcript released by the FBI shows that this Mutadi immediately told his accomplices to get ready and bring rifles, saying there were kidnappings over there, and that it was a game, a very fun game. Look at these terrorists; they called the massacre a 'very fun game,' asked others to buy ammunition for them, and coordinated armed groups to go over. So, later, the local cell tower recorded his signal. Also, when he applied for his U.S. visa in Egypt, he said he intended to work in Oklahoma in auto repair or food service. He did indeed end up working in food service. In fact, an unidentified FBI agent went to the restaurant where he worked in Louisiana in July and September 2025 to meet with him. I don't know if they were trying to see if they could turn him into an informant. It's possible they were probing to see if he could be used as an informant. His subsequent arrest likely means he showed he didn't want to be an informant, right? The FBI agent might have been conducting a sting operation; that's entirely possible.

And then, they said that at the time, actually, when he came to the United States, someone warned him—someone who should be from their side in Gaza told him, "You must never say in the United States that you have any ties with terrorist organizations here in Gaza, because these people in the US have criminal records, and once it's known, you'll be monitored." They even advised him not to post anything on social media supporting Hamas. But do you know how arrogant this guy was? Hey, he replied to that person, saying, "You don't need to worry, the United States has freedom of speech, and I express my views on social media, right? Well, they can't control me." See that? This is the exact same mindset as the terrorists of the CCP—well, not terrorists, the CCP's secret agents, including Guo Wengui and the like! You see, in this—this piece here actually exposes him. Look, this is him holding a gun after arriving in the United States, probably studying weapons at the place where he lived, and isn't he wearing that kind of Pakistani headscarf? Ah, this photo and others have been published in other reports.

Well, the key is that this person later—around last week this year—new news came out again, meaning, look, a few days ago, Israel's Wall Room specifically verified this news. How did he come to the United States? As for this guy, actually before coming to the US, his wife came a step ahead, presumably. Then after arriving in the US, his wife specifically posted a fundraising page on GoFundMe. Look at this, she posted photos of him and the children, as well as family photos, shaping him into the image of a good father who hopes and longs to reunite with his family, women, and children in the US. It says right here—the one just now is the GoFundMe—no, this one is the indictment, because his wife, due to making false statements regarding this fundraising and bringing him to the US—since his wife arrived in the US first and made all these false statements—his wife has now also been arrested and indicted. The previous one was the indictment, and what did this GoFundMe page say? Oh my god! It is extremely easy to touch the hearts of the Saint Bernards (the bleeding hearts)! Look, it says here: "Hello everyone, I am so-and-so. The photo above is of my husband and my two beautiful children, aged six and three." Indeed, these two kids look very cute, right? "Our home and workplace in Gaza have been completely destroyed. With the help of the US Embassy, my children and I were able to leave Gaza, but my husband is still trapped there." Oh my god! The US humanitarianism allowed women and children to leave, and he came here and lied to bring that terrorist over. No wonder why, after Rubio took office, he first shut down all these organizations—wait, not the State Council, but various humanitarian organizations and charities scattering money all over the world. Without going through them, how did he even get over here? Right? Then she said, "Our path to safety is hindered by rising visa fees, plane ticket fees, and the high cost of leaving through the Rafah crossing. Leaving my husband behind is an unimaginable choice. Oh, it's so painful! The huge financial obstacles leave my husband in the war zone, and I cannot move forward alone. I hope you can help my husband come to us and let our family reunite, right?" Well, if this terrorist hadn't left Gaza and had died there, I would have a humanitarian disaster! Why do they separate our family? All these narratives were stated completely.

Then this page actually, in a short period of time—he wanted to raise 30,000 USD at the time—got nearly 400 donations in a short time, raising 13,045 USD. Let me tell you, truly, playing the victim, crying poverty, and scamming money works anywhere. You can't just say American people are all fools. They indeed have faith, love, and humanity. But look at how they were exploited like this! These guys are truly vicious, aren't they? Well, they brought her husband over. Now, because the wife was also arrested, there is a supplementary indictment, right? Inside, it further opens up these newly disclosed contents, showing that what we just mentioned—the previously disclosed contents only showed him saying, hey brothers, going over there is very interesting, it's a game. Because his wife was arrested, the indictment has disclosed even more details. Look, this is him leading his gang of armed brothers, he's at the front, right? He still looks like a junior officer rank, photos included. Including, look, photos of him training militants, right? Including all these, they are all very terrifying. Now you see me playing this photo for you, and you think it's just a photo? Think about it, these people's targets include all of us infidels—how terrifying is that! Ah, all these photos are right here, well.

As shown in these newly released conversations, he was actually joking around while organizing these people to further invade Gaza, right? More details include him talking on the phone with an accomplice on October 7, saying, "Oh, the border is already open," and that some people were passing by in Toyota pickup trucks, clearly going to join the invasion. They even cheered, saying, "Our people are cheering inside the Israeli border!" Phone records also show that during the call, these terrorists kept laughing and even discussed how their terrorist actions would eventually lead to Gaza being retaliated against, which made them all very happy—they are simply total lunatics. There is a part in the indictment saying that on his way to attack and invade, he talked on the phone with his friend, saying, "Well, meaning by this afternoon, we will all be in Israel, right? Israel will definitely fight back, and by then half of Gaza will be wiped out, nothing will be left except my grocery store!" It turns out he even runs a grocery store in Gaza. You wouldn't know; you'd think he was an honest, ordinary person living a normal life in Gaza, running a grocery store with a wife and cute kids. But you see that? In a second, he transforms into a terrorist! Then his accomplice said on the phone that the Jews are still in shock. Remember, it was a Jewish holiday at the time, Simchat Torah? He said, "Yeah, these Jews are still drunk and haven't woken up yet. Today is the last day of their holiday." Then he talked about the kidnapping of hostages. He directly discussed with his friend on the phone, saying, "If things go the way they should, Syria and Lebanon—those terrorists will join this war, and it will turn into World War III. This World War III will take months or become a war of attrition." And then he said these hostages would eventually be used in a trade to force Israel into a ceasefire. You see that? People were kidnapped so that Israel wouldn't dare to completely wipe them out; this was planned from the very beginning. And what else did he say?

Ah, meaning that after this war, not only will Gaza lose half its territory, but it will regress by fifty years, and there won't be any more Gazan or Pakistani workers going to work in Israel. Look, they are basically kidnapping all the local people, right? Are there any innocent people in Gaza? Are there any innocent people in Pakistan? I believe that when extreme conditions are not reached, there are still some people who aren't that evil. But if you aren't that evil, they will wipe you out too. So that place is truly terrifying, absolutely terrifying. How can you be out here engaging in pro-Pakistan and pro-Hamas activities? What are you if not a terrorist? And the CCP is still constantly promoting these things, right? Moreover, this person also told others on the phone, "We are lucky; we are in the front row rushing in. Many brothers are calling—I swear to Allah, they can't wait to go to Israel." They also discussed getting some coffee, hijacking cars in Israel, and asking, "How many people can this car seat?" They even discussed their little grocery stores and whether they still needed to run them. Does this mean that now that they are in Israel, they won't need to go back to their old lives in Gaza anymore? Completely unbridled, and they said...

At 9:30 AM on October 7, he already told his brothers, "I've crossed into the Israeli border! Brothers, hurry up and come in! Once you're in, turn off your phones." So you see, these new details were actually unsealed because of a new indictment, meaning all the intelligence gathered during the investigation of the entire Hamas massacre. Over the past few years, all of this has been intercepted and analyzed. So you see, the CCP thinks whatever it does—whether hidden behind the scenes by several layers—just look at what every single surging terrorist of Hamas said; they can pull all of this content back out for you now, so you should know.

Whether the US is watching you, the CCP, release the COVID-19 virus, conduct nuclear test explosions, attempt to take Taiwan, review that May 14 recording, or check whether that 093-417 submarine had an accident, they can genuinely retrieve your phone call records. Don't really think you're being clever. And what about The New York Times after you guys got ahold of it? How is that? Operating under the banner of media to undermine US national security. I talked specifically about this on my members-only show this morning; if you haven't listened to it, go listen right now! We stripped away the veneer of The New York Times to see whether it is actually a media outlet or just a front disguised like a CCP telecom scam platform, acting merely as a disinformation syndicate! So here, you see, with all these phone records now exposed, outsiders can see that these terrorists are not just inhuman; they are complete and utter lunatics.

I just feel that calling them lunatics isn't enough; they are absolute devils, right? Just look at this guy, his entire family is in the United States, he is using money donated by Americans, and he is unscrupulously spreading all kinds of messages in American media, bragging about how well he is living here, talking about freedom of speech.

Well, speaking of this, hey, have you noticed that in the last two days, there's been another wave of rumors claiming that Xi Jinping is in poor health? Trump just said a couple of days ago that Xi Jinping is in great health, and that he observed it personally. I'll say it again, Xi Jinping is a coward, especially after the Trump-Xi meeting; he didn't gain any advantage and left in a dejected manner. Then there were two terrorist attacks, which were also unsuccessful. Hey, shall we say the "National Day gift" was a complete disaster? In short, look.

I keep saying Xi is going to play the coward, play dead! Trump had already blocked this path for him in his interview with Time magazine, but surprisingly, The Wall Street Journal still insists on saying that Xi has health problems. Then, major media outlets immediately started forwarding this news, just like a chaotic scramble in a cockpit. Honestly, I have to say, the CCP's propaganda machine is so rigid that it can't keep up with the changing situation, right? Look at The Wall Street Journal, which insists that sources familiar with the preparations for the visit revealed that the Chinese side made unusual requests, namely that the U.S. must meet Xi's rest needs during the Trump-Xi meeting, and what they call a rare revelation of the 73-year-old leader's increasingly apparent physical limitations. And what are these so-called physical limitations? Anyway, when The Wall Street Journal publishes these kinds of rumors about Xi's health, there is zero credibility to be found, right? They say the Chinese side requested the White House West Wing to arrange a private room for Xi Jinping, exclusively for Peng Liyuan to accompany him to rest during breaks in activities, and that no other members of the Chinese delegation were allowed to use this room, not even Cai Qi. They say this team refused the originally scheduled working lunch between the U.S. and Chinese leaders on September 24.

Furthermore, they say they hoped Xi Jinping would have more time to rest during his visit to Washington. As a result, there was about a five-hour gap in the summit agenda during a visit that lasted less than two days. They also said that on the last day, Xi only stayed at the National Archives for about ten minutes, far less than what U.S. officials had planned. They said he didn't attend any activities on the night of his arrival, implying that, well, look, when Trump was in Beijing, he was accepting interviews and doing all sorts of things during his free time, while for Xi Jinping, how long he can stand, how far he can walk, and when he needs to rest are all things his team has to arrange. They even said, 'Oh, we've never seen such a request for a separate room to rest before; we didn't see this when Hu Jintao, the Australian Prime Minister, or Junichiro Koizumi visited the U.S.' Then they say, 'Look, he sometimes limps when he walks, sometimes he has to hold onto a handrail; he must have health problems.' Oh, I've said it before, you at The Wall Street Journal have been hyping up Xi's health problems for so long, and Xi is still alive and well. Don't you think your sources might be problematic, or the reporters writing the articles might be the problem? I've said it many times, we haven't mentioned it, but Xi's slight limp when walking is due to the sequelae of injections in his gluteus maximus caused by tuberculosis back in the day, right? So there's no way around it; even after rehabilitation, he can't walk that smoothly.

And you say he had no activities on the night of his arrival? Trump didn't want to arrange any activities for him anyway, did he? Maybe Trump didn't even want to see him much? You say he refused lunch the next day? That's your own business. In fact, Xi didn't want to see Trump for even a minute longer; he didn't even want to come in the first place. What five-hour gap, what booking a small room? Let's just say Xi didn't want to see Trump to begin with; he would avoid it if he could, and the less he saw him, the more he felt he had lived another day.

That is very understandable. He would rather arrange for rest in between than fill his schedule. As for your claims about him only staying ten minutes at the National Archives, wasn't it you who bragged that Xi firmly refused to look at the Treaty of San Francisco? Ah, anyway, as long as the U.S. notified him, he can leave whenever he wants. And you say The Wall Street Journal claims this room was only for Xi and Peng Liyuan, and even the Chief of the General Office, Cai Qi, wasn't allowed in? What is Cai Qi anyway? Just a big eunuch, isn't he? Not even a personal attendant? Hey, the Emperor's private room, the Empress goes in to accompany and serve him, that's perfectly normal. Hey, who do you think Cai Qi is? Does he have to be like Trump, staying in public and having to meet reporters? Honestly, I say this is why it feels like Xi's side is losing its footing, all sorts of things. We said yesterday that the useless reporter from Le Monde, right, the one who tried to flatter him but ended up kicking the horse's leg. Saying, 'Oh, although you all feel that Xi's visit was fruitless, it's mainly because Xi didn't want to achieve anything, right?' Trump wanted to achieve something, but Xi didn't.

Ah, it's like saying, oh, they just let a wild boar loose, and the goal is for it to smash plates everywhere. You can't expect it to do delicate, fine work for you, right? To create something artistic? It's out there specifically to smash plates. If you're going to say that yourself, there's nothing we can do, right? We can only say that the propaganda you outsourced to these eunuchs just doesn't sound good enough! As Chinese people, we can tell right away that it doesn't taste right. And then, on the other hand, they insist on saying, oh, Xi needs a rest, yet they don't dare say that Xi won't live much longer. After all, if you're out there doing propaganda, if you were to say that Xi really looks like he won't live much longer, tell me, which reporter, which person in the Publicity Department of the CCP Central Committee would dare to publish that? They'd be the ones not living much longer, right? So they can only say, oh, although he seems to be in poor health, these years he has...

Still firmly controlled China. Oh, stop making up this 'wanting both' nonsense. No, you have to sing the blues about Trump every day—one moment Trump has dementia, the next moment Trump has bruises on his hands, or Trump is eighty years old and his health is failing. You know yourself that Trump's schedule is completely full, he doesn't need to rest, he doesn't need to do anything, yet you don't praise Trump; instead, you use him to set off Xi Jinping, who is physically weak and sickly, right? Do you mean to say that Xi Jinping is like Lin Daiyu, although he is in poor health and coughs up blood every day, he can still live to be over seventy, right?

It doesn't work like that. Hey, let me show you this. Yesterday we were talking about that reporter from Le Monde, the one who acts as an outsourced eunuch for the CCP. Come on, do you remember what we said before about that guy, the second generation of the Boken family in Texas, who was arrested after returning to the United States? His father is a conservative politician in Texas, and he's the guy who writes columns for Guancha, CCTV, and the People's Daily in Communist China, right? He lived in China for a long time.

After he was arrested, he pleaded guilty not long after. After pleading guilty, he was sentenced on September 1st. I was too lazy to talk about this before, but it's a good time to mention it briefly at the end today. This guy was sentenced to two years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Because he pleaded guilty, it confirmed his identity as a U.S. citizen who assisted the Chinese state security (MSS) in carrying out intelligence activities, recruiting personnel, and collecting sensitive information, betraying his own country for money, and assisting the CCP for as long as seven years, doing all kinds of propaganda work for the CCP. Hey, I ask you, what kind of instructions did Boken receive during his seven years in Communist China? How did he write that 'positive energy' stuff?

As he confessed during the plea investigation, couldn't the U.S. follow the trail to see who else is like him? Right? It's very obvious! This guy said, look, it specifically adds here that at least from 2019 to February 2026, he knew he was being directed and controlled by the CCP's secret agents, yet he continued to work for them. And then, there was a person with the code name 'Casey' whom he met in 2017. Casey gave him tasks, including telling him which intelligence recruitment targets to meet, and providing him with contact phones, computers, and other equipment.

He was required to collect certain information and submit intelligence reports. He received at least $100,000 for this cooperation and traveled multiple times from China to the U.S. to meet these intelligence personnel. At the same time, there were two others, one with the code name 'Richard' and one with the code name 'William.' This state security department is very fond of using these English names. Like, back in the day, there was a state security agent who...

Was doing live streams online, on YouTube—uh, no, not live streams, just a video account, called something like 'Speak Properly.' Wasn't there a code name 'William' or something in there? Including that state security agent 'Tony,' who first contacted Lude at the end of 2019, also claimed his name was William, and then changed his name to Tony after arriving in the U.S. In reality, his name is Guo Yu, right?

They all use these names. And then it says Boken met this 'Richard' and 'William' in 2017. And these two people told him, 'We gave the reports you wrote to Japan.' But Boken isn't stupid; Boken knew these reports were for the CCP, and he also sold reports to a group of Chinese people in Wuhan, including information about U.S. technology and sensitive information from the Department of Justice. He helped them find experts to engage in cyber espionage, and so on and so forth.

So I'm telling you, it's not that the U.S. isn't watching; it's just that it's not time to close the net yet. And those they watch without closing the net are often for bigger fish. So we say, like the Wall Street Journal, RFI, and all these Chinese editions, right? These spies are all playing the same tricks; we can all see through it. Don't treat the U.S. like a fool, okay? When the time comes for counter-terrorism or whatever, once everything is activated, all these tools can be used, so just watch—there will be plenty of excitement. Alright, I'll talk to you all about this for now, and I'll be back at the same time tomorrow.