Spontaneous? Xinhua Writes "Representatives"! In 2015, the Embassy Recruited 700 Students; In 2023, Lobster Dinners for $200/Day and Fights Broke Out; In 2026, Only Recruits Under 70, Requiring Passport Numbers. CPPCC Titles Become Criminal Evidence, Prominent Overseas Chinese Leaders Have Their Names Erased! The CCP Can Only Buy Mercenaries Overseas.
The video focuses on the welcome activities for overseas Chinese during Xi Jinping's visit to the US in 2026. It compares the mobilization of personnel, expenses, organizational methods, and conflicts during three events: Washington in 2015, San Francisco in 2023, and Washington in 2026. It also analyzes the legal risks faced by overseas united front participants, citing cases like Lu Jianwang, and the changes in the CCP's recruitment methods, from relying on titles and benefits from local Chinese policies to resorting to cash payments after the decline in value of these incentives.
Video link:
Full text:
Observing things as they are, rejecting fragmented cognition. Yesterday, that idiot Xi Jinping arrived in the United States, and things were quite lively inside the venue. At 5:30 PM, as soon as this idiot's plane landed at Andrews Air Force Base, old Trump and his wife Melania personally came to the tarmac to greet him, and bombers flew overhead. This was a courtesy arrangement. I specifically checked, and the matter of flying planes was something old Trump added himself, and it has only been used three times. Let's look at who it was used for: once when he met Putin in Alaska last year, then again when he received the Saudi Crown Prince last November, and now this time. You can see the nature of these regimes from how this plane-flying gesture is used. Saudi Arabia goes without saying, as it's a monarchy. The other two are dictatorships even harsher than monarchies. Old Trump likes to add this kind of drama when dealing with regimes of this nature. Is it a welcome? If it's a welcome, the United States has its own protocol system. But if you say it's a deterrence, he himself went to receive him, so I judge this to be a kind of declaration. A declaration of what? That even though you are powerful, I am more powerful than you. I think this is very much in line with old Trump's psychological paradigm, which is that old Trump must mentally dominate the other party.
We see that the tarmac greeting scene was already lively, and the periphery was even more so. I saw on X that the crowd of Little Pinks welcoming him on the periphery directly clashed with the anti-CCP camp, and it was also very lively. Today, let's talk about a sentence from the Xinhua News Agency's official report, just one sentence. What did it say? It said that overseas Chinese and student representatives gathered on both sides of the road, waving the flags of China and the United States, to welcome Xi Jinping's arrival. Everyone should pay attention to the word "representatives" (代表). The things written by these idiot sycophants of the CCP are full of contradictions, even in their word choice. If they are representatives, why are they "self-organized" (自发)? What kind of nonsense is that? Can I also say that my mother asked me to spontaneously go buy soy sauce for him? Just think about it, how can this spontaneous welcome become a representation? So, if the CCP says they are representatives, who selected them? And who paid for their travel expenses?
Actually, this kind of thing, from Xi Jinping's first visit to the White House as president in 2015, to the APEC meeting in San Francisco in 2023, and then to yesterday, over a span of 10 years, I have reviewed the accounts for all three stops. From the cost to the number of people, plus the fights and arrests, when you trace this line, you discover a very interesting trend: this team of representatives is becoming increasingly expensive, increasingly old, increasingly prone to fighting, and increasingly dwindling in number.
Let's first talk about the 2015 event. Coincidentally, in 2015, Xi Jinping, this idiot, also arrived in Washington on September 24th. How did the CCP's official press release describe it then? It said thousands of overseas Chinese in the greater Washington area spontaneously took to the streets to welcome him, holding banners that read,
Regarding the price, the Hong Kong Democracy Council and the Tibetan Students Association for Freedom released a report costing $16 billion. They recorded the going rate at approximately $200 per person per day, which included hotels and buses, and reportedly even lobster dinners. Each bus costs at least $5,000 per day, and with over 400 rooms, even at $150 per night, that's $60,000, right? The Washington Post has seen the WeChat group records, and these two groups can be matched. I'll read you the notice issued by the Chinese Students Association of USC: "Invited by the Consulate, transportation and accommodation are free of charge. This is a glorious mission. For your safety, you must not act alone. Once you sign up, you cannot withdraw, and the content must not be shared externally." Look at how they phrase it: the mission is glorious, but you cannot withdraw. Is this what you call a welcome? This is forced labor! It's as if China is recruiting workers on an assembly line in the US.
But what is the conclusion of the report? Students are no longer the main group among these attendees. The main participants are middle-aged and elderly people from Fujian hometown associations, Lianjiang hometown associations, Changle labor unions, as well as Henan and Sichuan hometown associations. What did reporters from the San Francisco Standard find at the scene? Most people present couldn't even speak English.
There was indeed a fight. On November 14th, the banner of a female protester named Jia Junwei was snatched, and she was dragged into the circle formed by red flags. There was hair pulling, hitting her head, and she was eventually knocked unconscious. She was later diagnosed with a concussion in San Francisco. Immediately after, on October 15th, protester Wang Wei was injured by a flagpole and, after falling, was also had his head shaved. He was sent to the hospital in time and was fine. On the same day, three Tibetan university students were beaten by more than 20 thugs with metal rods. Two were hospitalized with fractures. Following that, on November 16th, Chen Zhuangzhuang of the China Democratic Party was sprayed in the eyes with pepper spray, rendering him unable to open them. There were incidents for several consecutive days. On the 17th, there was another incident in the Costco parking lot near the airport. Zhang Kaiyu, who had just moved from Shanghai to Los Angeles in March 2023, was followed and beaten by 9 to 12 thugs wearing red headscarves until he lost consciousness, remaining in the emergency room until the next day.
How many incidents did that report record? It documented 34 cases of harassment and assault. It also recorded the leaders of 19 United Front侨团 (overseas Chinese associations) at the scene, 12 of whom directly participated in the assaults, and at least 3 were hospitalized. You see, these dozen or so people who bled, even the ones who were fighting, had undergone training, and their movements were highly coordinated and consistent.
Let me tell you their tactics. The tactic is to set up a giant Five-Star Red Flag at the scene. The use of this flag is quite standard; it's mainly used to block the banners of the opposition, and incidentally, to block the actions of the attackers so that the cameras can't capture them. Then, the pointed end of the flagpole is used to stab people. The folded umbrellas are also used to block cameras and to hit people. Pepper spray, sand, and all sorts of other dirty things are thrown in their faces. The red headscarves and red armbands are identifiers for their own people in the melee; those wearing red identifiers are the enforcers, the thugs. Another group is dressed in what? Those wearing black sportswear are the lookouts. These people in black sportswear are mainly responsible for identifying troublemakers on the periphery.
The CCP hired at least 60 private security guards at the time, with hourly wages up to $70. These people mainly linked arms to prevent protesters from moving, acting as a buffer. When would you say the peak of this tactic occurred? It was around the time of the 2008 Beijing Olympics. There was an Olympic torch relay event in San Francisco at the time; I don't know if everyone remembers. Let's compare. According to reports from that year, the Chinese American Federation organized 150 groups, prepared 10,000 small flags and 10,000 T-shirts, plus over 90 buses. If you compare the situation then with what came later, in 2015, the dragon and lion dances were still present, but the red flag was no longer a display tactic; it was held up in front of the protesters' banners. By 2023, nothing was for display; everything was for blocking, identification, and suppression.
Why is this happening? The logic is very simple. Where does the benefit of a display-type rally come from? It comes from onlookers finding it visually appealing, so you need a large crowd and a sense of performance. And where does the benefit of a defensive rally come from? It comes from the protesters' banners not appearing in the CCP media's camera shots. So, this thing needs to be able to block, people need to be able to stand, and voices need to be able to drown out the other side.
Look at how the CCP writes about it. In 2015, the front page of the Guangming Daily was "Xi Dada is here." In 2023, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' press release was reduced to a single sentence: "Many overseas Chinese and representatives of Chinese students waited along the streets." Today's press release used almost the exact same sentence again.
Why isn't China itself displaying anymore? Because the benefit of displaying is now zero. The only remaining benefit is blocking. However, their opponents in blocking are also evolving, from the relatively unskilled opposition and petitioners of 2015 to Hong Kongers, Tibetans, and the White Paper generation who can climb lampposts, use their phones to film, and testify before Congress. So, blocking had to be upgraded to what? It had to be upgraded to physical action. Recruiting people for this CCP team is becoming more difficult, because of several well-known cases in the US, which I think can serve as teaching cases for Taiwan.
Take a look, on April 17, 2023, the US Department of Justice announced three cases on the same day. These three cases were the underground CCP police station cases of Lu Jianwang and Chen Jinping, the case of 34 police officers from the Ministry of Public Security's 912 special task force, and the case of a former Zoom employee. In these cases, the US Department of Justice used the framework of transnational repression systematically for the first time.
Then, on February 9 this year, a federal court in Los Angeles sentenced a political operator named Sun Yaoning to four years in prison. One of the facts in the judgment stated: In February 2023, he drafted a report and applied to the CCP government for an $80,000 budget based on this report, to organize pro-China demonstrations during the July 4th parade in Washington to counter anti-China forces. You read that correctly, he was applying to the CCP government for a budget to organize rallies in Washington. This statement is now a settled fact in federal court.
Following this, on May 13, a federal jury in Brooklyn convicted Lu Jianwang of working for a foreign government without reporting it to the Department of Justice, and obstructing justice. Court testimony also revealed that Lu Jianwang was added to a WeChat group of 65 people, consisting of officials from the Ministry of Public Security and heads of overseas stations worldwide. This testimony also exposed that in March 2022, Fuzhou Public Security asked this guy in the group to verify the address of an opinion leader in Los Angeles named Xu Jie, and he then assigned the task to members of the Fujian Hometown Association.
Now, if you put these two ends together, in 2015, overseas Chinese leaders stood in front of the red flag, the cost was zero, and the benefit was a seat as a non-voting delegate to the CPPCC, and they could use this title before the Gaokao in China. In 2026, if these idiots are still standing at the front, the cost will be being identified and named by The Washington Post after 11 years, and also being interviewed by the FBI. What does Lu Jianwang's case prove? This cost can be a conviction 11 years later, and as for the benefits, what did the CCP do in March 2018? They merged the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office into the CCP's United Front Work Department. Overseas Chinese affairs transformed from an administrative system with a budget and projects into a party affairs system. The party affairs system only disburses money, it doesn't issue projects, meaning it doesn't give money.
In addition, the CCP's current policies are also worthless, because the policies given by the CCP need to be realized within the Chinese market. Now, this Chinese market is also worthless. Behind them is nothing more than a city or county that relies on transfer payments even for civil servant salaries. Therefore, the CCP's current investment promotion policies are also worthless to these idiot overseas Chinese leaders. And what can this title become? It can also become criminal evidence? The projects are just empty checks. The certification of this title still exists, but compared to 10 years ago, it's not worth much anymore.
If you calculate this account, then the rational actions for top overseas Chinese leaders are three: remove their names from the announcement, replace the front person with the owner of a travel agency or a Chinese school, and replace the team with a bunch of idiots who have no status, no assets, and don't know US law. And there's a fun accompanying item: with the previous benefits gone, the team can only rely on what? Rely on immediate cash settlement.
So what's the going rate for this rally in 2026? Let me make it clear, all the following numbers come from the same batch of WeChat screenshots. There are some from Kan Zhongguo and some re-posted by Apollo Net, all of which are anti-establishment websites, belonging to a single source. However, this can serve as corroborating evidence with mainstream media evidence. We will just treat it as an external clue for everyone to observe. What does the screenshot say? The event is from September 22nd to 26th. You see, food, accommodation, and transportation are covered, plus an $80 labor fee. If you live further away, there are free plane tickets. Hotels are double occupancy, the registration deadline is September 13th, and anyone under 70 can participate.
What's the most fun part here? The number of spots is limited, first come, first served. However, participants need to provide their passport number or ID number. And who is the organizer? It's a Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Los Angeles and a Chinese school in Delaware. The convener is a woman named Sister Xia in Los Angeles. The source of funding is listed as the Chinese Embassy and the Chamber of Commerce. Do you see the change in the language of this announcement? What was it in 2015? What bullshit was it in 2015? "Hello Xi Dada." In 2023 it was "Glorious mission, no withdrawal allowed." This year it's "Under 70, first come, first served," $80 plus airfare plus hotel. The nominal cash is lower than the $200 in 2023, but the settlement method has changed from post-subsidy to full airfare coverage. Didn't those international students haggle and delay when they received that $20 before? Now it's cash for airfare, meaning the per capita cost has actually increased. This is the price performance after the political rent has disappeared.
Just around September 16th this year, about a week before Emperor You Xi, that idiot, arrived, the U.S. State Department posted another warning: foreign agents engaged in activities contrary to U.S. interests can have their visas revoked. A former National Security Council China affairs director commented very bluntly: Chinese residents in the U.S. who are called by the CCP government to participate in idiotic rallies supporting something like Xi Jinping, if you haven't registered as a foreign agent, it's better to stay home. Therefore, the line for those 700 students in 2015 has been institutionally cut off.
Who is left to recruit? A 2023 Pew Research Center survey shows that only 25% of U.S.-born Chinese have a favorable view of the CCP, while new immigrants who have been in the U.S. for less than 10 years have 56%. Those with legitimate jobs, like engineers, are still waiting for their green cards. If these people were to occupy the streets, the risk would be a background check all over again, so the benefit for them is zero.
Therefore, the CCP can only screen from the top income earners among new immigrants in the last 10 years, mainly undocumented blue-collar workers from the Fuzhou and Wenzhou communities, or the elderly apartments in Chinatown. The 70-year-old threshold comes from this. Last night, a reporter from Radio Free Asia saw something on the streets of Washington: people waving the Five-Star Red Flag, attempting to expand the area of the flag to block Tibetans walking from the UN headquarters in New York and Hong Kongers holding
From San Francisco in 2023 to Washington in 2026, the organizers' lists, bus contracts, recruitment screenshots, and funding sources have all been compiled into files by American society. Who are these files submitted to directly? They are submitted to the US Congress and the Department of Justice. What does the Lu Jianwang case prove? It proves that such files can become evidence for conviction even after 11 years. With every additional conviction, the cost for the CCP to buy one person's loyalty increases by one notch.
Within the United Front system, besides these students and the White Paper Generation, there are also Chinese Americans born in the US. No one is willing to take up this offer, no one wants this damn thing. These idiotic overseas community leaders were bought by the CCP anyway, and they will disband themselves once the rent stops. In fact, it's the same for Taiwan. The CCP uses the same old trick for those so-called general associations and chairpersons. Taiwan's Act to Prevent Foreign Interference and Subversion took effect in January 2020, didn't it? Just follow the path of the Lu Jianwang case.
The key point is not his speech; he can say whatever he wants. The main focus is the chain of command and money. Once the CCP can no longer buy shareholders overseas, what can it buy? Mercenaries. Mercenaries have no loyalty; they'll spill everything with just one interrogation. So, Taiwan can ponder this carefully.