[Lude Society] 9/28/2026

This episode mainly discusses Trump's intensive posting of photos of his meeting with Xi Jinping on Truth Social, and provides a detailed comparison of the $30 billion trade tariff reduction list released by both China and the US, pointing out that China is importing a large number of conventional and universal goods. At the same time, the program analyzes the attempted terrorist attack at the RAF Fairford base in the UK and the subsequent bail of the suspect, and explores Russian President Putin's statement regarding the Russia-China lunar research station cooperation project.

Video link:

Full text:

Hello, viewers and friends, welcome to today's September 28, 2026, Lude Media Dr. Yan's show. There is a lot of content to cover today, especially the fact that Trump posted a series of Truth Social posts today, releasing photos of his meeting with Xi Jinping. However, it is very interesting that he did not post many photos of big occasions; instead, I will show you in a moment, Trump posted several photos, a large proportion of which are photos of him and Xi on the granite helipad at the White House from various angles. This is very interesting. Why did Trump suddenly post so many today? Right, what else did Trump say about Xi today? Let's talk about many things one by one, okay? First, let's say hello to everyone. This ZD GING says that things are too involuted inside the country now, with frontline factory workers generally working 12-hour shifts, half an hour for meals, and 15 minutes just for queuing for meals, with no time to rest or go to the bathroom at all. The work is high-intensity, repetitive assembly line work. I ask the US and the EU to quickly sanction companies that engage in malicious overtime.

This is what happens without labor laws, combined with this authoritarian country, right? There's no way around it. In the current state of affairs, even if others sanction him, he doesn't care, right? Look at the same companies expanding overseas. Even when they go to Brazil—and you could say Brazil is still far behind the CCP's country—BYD, for example, treats its employees much better there than it does domestically. Yet, it's still being accused of forced labor and causing such a huge stir. And Brazil is such a pro-CCP country! So, I'm telling you, when the CCP always says, 'Oh, if you like the US so much, why don't you go to the US?'—well, not everyone can come here legally, can they? So why doesn't your CCP country change? Right? I tell you, this system will eventually collapse, and then the advanced systems of the US will be introduced, right? You might say the US isn't an angelic country and certainly has its own problems—wherever there are people, there are problems—but you can't say the situation is as dire as this. Right? Of course, I can't say the factory situation you described is like a prison, because we know the CCP's prisons are even more terrifying. I feel it's more like that Hengshui High School style, right? It's said that students at Hengshui High School even have to look at their books and recite texts while eating. Anyway, I've seen some videos, and I think if those students don't end up with mental illnesses after graduating, they must have incredibly strong stress resistance, right? Okay, let's stop there for now. Let's get back to the point. Look, I specifically brought this up because it's so interesting. Didn't Trump have another press conference this morning? Trump basically spends time meeting with reporters almost every day, as long as he's working at the White House, so it's an extremely transparent method. There was a report from a couple of days ago where a reporter asked Trump, 'Did you ask Xi Jinping if he wanted to buy US weapons?' The reporter asked him directly, 'Did you suggest to Xi Jinping that the US sell military equipment to China?' Trump said, 'To China? Are you referring to Taiwan?' The reporter said, 'No, I mean China.' Hey, you can tell Trump was definitely playing dumb on purpose. Trump's response—this reporter was clearly trying to stir up trouble. Trump's point was: 'You say China, are you talking about Taiwan?' By saying that, he immediately put the reporter, who was acting as a mouthpiece for the CCP, into a 'One China, One Taiwan' dilemma, right? 'If you mean China as in Taiwan, I would sell them military equipment, wouldn't I?' Then the reporter said, 'No, no, I mean the CCP's country.' Trump said, 'I've never heard of that. Our equipment is indeed better than China's, but we didn't discuss that issue. We learned from the cases of Iran and Venezuela that China's equipment is far from as good as they brag about. The US is the greatest country in the world.' The Lude Media actually mentioned this point yesterday. To me, the point here is that Trump was at most just casually mocking Xi. 'You idiots actually took that seriously and came to bother me? We didn't discuss that issue,' right? Trump's meaning was, at most, he just brushed it off, right? Look, Trump first said, 'We know from Iran and Venezuela—two countries that ended up so miserably—that the CCP's equipment is far from as good as they brag.' Man, asking that question was a real humiliation for China. I want to know which propaganda department arranged for that reporter to ask that question; they should be fired and thrown in jail, right? A total disaster. Trump's point was, even if he did say it privately—because there's no public recording of what Trump said—in terms of the description, Trump often improvises, and he uses it to mock Xi. Think about it: if he was chatting with Xi and said, 'Do you want to buy our equipment?' I think it's highly likely they were discussing how the F-35 canopy was secretly moved from Australia to South Korea, then to Hong Kong, and finally ended up in the hands of the CCP. Do you think he would bring up that case privately? I think he definitely would. The media has been talking about this for days, right? So, if Trump talked about it privately, it would be, 'You took this F-35, do you want to buy our weapons?' That certainly doesn't mean the US wants to sell it to him. And this topic definitely couldn't be discussed further; as Trump said, they didn't 'discuss' it. It couldn't go any further, right? And Xi—we don't know if he could even understand it on the spot. I think it's actually quite hard for Xi. Trump is a very smart person with a very fast brain. On Xi's side, first, he doesn't understand, so the translation is already discounted; second, his brain has to keep up. I think whenever Xi is in front of Trump and faces something unprepared, it's like a brainstorming session for him. It's a good thing if he doesn't get a headache when he goes back. So, to put it bluntly, this matter is just like the Huagangyan issue; Trump just threw the words out there. Do you think Trump would really discuss the Huagangyan issue in depth with Xi? Certainly not. So, don't worry about the weapon sales. How could the US President call the leader of a hostile country over and say, 'I want to sell you military equipment,' unless there's something else going on behind the scenes.

So after this reporter asked questions, they really gave the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) a thorough going-over from start to finish. Ah. And then, let's see, today is Monday, and Bessent announced on Fox, confirming what was said today about releasing the contents of the trade list, involving a 30-billion-dollar reciprocal commodity agreement, right? Including tariff reductions on these 30 billion dollars worth of goods. So, the White House has confirmed the following outcomes. It's very long, and later we'll compare for both sides: what did your 30 billion buy? And what did my 30 billion buy? Let me tell you, it's one thing not to look at this list, but once you look, the CCP's defeat was truly tragic. And it once again proves what we said, ah, I said they'd buy some medical trinkets for the holidays, right? Their main focus is buying these things. Oh, it's too hilarious, ah. Look, this is what Bessent said, look at this past year, Trump and Xi Jinping are expected to hold four meetings, and the following outcomes have already been confirmed, including, simply put in the broadcast, he said that both sides will reduce tariffs on 30 billion dollars worth of goods in each direction, which includes agricultural products, seafood, wood products, cosmetics, and medical devices sold by the U.S. to the CCP. Then, China will import at least 10 million tons of U.S. coal in 2027, and at least another 10 million tons in 2028. I mean, Xi, anyway, this is no different from paying war reparations, let me tell you, the U.S. is holding your head down and forcing you to buy these things, right? As we mentioned about the Treaty of Wangxia and the Treaty of Tianjin back then, why else would Trump show them to Xi? Trump's point was, look, back in those days when indemnities weren't forced, they still expanded trade with me. Nowadays, we're playing the same game, right? Instead of making you pay direct indemnities, you just buy whatever I need through trade, right? This isn't called forced buying and selling; this is called reciprocal trade.

So anyway, Xi definitely got the short end of the stick on this, right? And then, Bessent summarized what was said in the White House fact sheet. We are also following this fact sheet: simply put, both sides talked about eight points each, but the CCP side basically watered down all kinds of capitulation. For example, the U.S. side's fact sheet specifically mentioned the fentanyl issue, describing it as some sort of joint crackdown. But it emphasized that 21 Chinese drug traffickers were arrested under U.S.-China cooperation. What was the CCP's phrasing? How did they put it? They acted so innocent, ah, claiming that U.S.-China cooperation and joint efforts, hey, made progress against drugs, phrasing it as if two countries were jointly cracking down on a third country. Right? They didn't dare mention why all the drug traffickers were Chinese nationals. Is that what you call cooperation? Weren't you forced by others to hand over some little bosses to protect Xi's own hide, right? Alright, then let's take a look again, ah, what's interesting is we have to share with you what exactly is on this list. Oh right, Bessent also said something quite funny, Bessent specifically mentioned on Fox yesterday that at the time the list hadn't been officially released yet, because what came out today is a detailed spreadsheet-style list, ah, very long. Yesterday, there was only the White House's summary of demands, right? So the host asked at that time, saying, "Oh look, now although the U.S.-China trade deficit has dropped from 300 billion U.S. dollars to 150 billion or 160 billion U.S. dollars, are you satisfied? Will the CCP fulfill its promises? Can we trust them? Will the CCP let us off the hook?" Right? You see, nobody has an ounce of trust in the CCP. As a result, Bessent said at the time, ah, this is the greatness of Xi Jinping's visit to the White House; hey, whenever we reach a deadlock in negotiations with Chinese officials, I would say, "Listen, you haven't implemented the consensus of our two heads of state," and that usually breaks the deadlock. So this is driven from the top down, and then everyone sees, ah, you see, this matter of Xi Jinping coming to see Trump is very important. When you hear these words, do they sound right? Ah? Doesn't this simply confirm once again, through Bessent's own mouth, that Xi Jinping is that supreme leader, that unelected and illegally ascended dictator, and no matter how much Xi plays dead or plays the coward, right? When something happens, you just invoke Xi's name, right? Everyone below is trembling and executing Xi's orders, not daring to disobey Xi or displease him. Therefore, the U.S. now sees this, including firsthand experiences like Bessent's, right?

No matter how the lower-level officials try to shirk responsibility, obstruct, or make trouble, as long as he drops a single line: "Hey, your boss already spoke with our boss. You know, in America, our president is not a dictator, so when we go out to get things done, we each have our respective authorities. You might not have any, but you, the big eunuch handling this matter, right? Just think about what your master wants, figure it out clearly, and you better coordinate with me seriously. I’m not a eunuch like you, am I?" So you see, over here in the Chinese Communist State, whether it's He Lifeng or whoever else, or Xie Feng and the rest of them, whenever they meet American officials, it works just like "Open Sesame." Bessent holds this and plays this, and the Xi-CCP side is completely submissive. And even if your side wants to make trouble, why does Trump insist on meeting Xi? Why meet every few months? It's precisely to hold the system in his own hands from top to bottom, right? The entire US side coordinates to play the Xi-CCP and Wang Huning in the palm of their hand. Ah, once the lower levels are pretty much sorted out, Trump says the final hurdle—Xi's brain is still stuck trying to make trouble. So every time this happens, Trump summons Xi over: "Hey, let's meet." After the meeting, it's just kneeling down. And if you think about it, looking at it this way, this whole thing is extremely interesting. The US started a trade war with the CCP in May of last year, and before last year ended—right around the end of the year—Trump said he would meet Xi four times in 2026, right? Or rather, he should have specified back then, actually before the Busan summit, he said that throughout the entire coming year, all the way until November of this year, he would meet Xi four times. Do you see it now?

So how did the US manage to calculate this so precisely over a year in advance—such a complex drama between two superpowers, fraught with saber-rattling, mixed with geopolitics and all sorts of dynamics? When to meet, how many times to meet, what goals to achieve, and how to advance step-by-step through each phase. What does this show? Looking at the whole picture, I'd say if the US were an AI, or AGI, or whatever, we don't know how it's defined, right? There are actually many ways to define it in the US, but I think the name "Super Intelligence" fits really well. Truly, if you look at it, over the past year or more, the US has had the Xi-CCP wrapped around its finger, defusing bombs all over the world, dismantling all these stumbling blocks, flesh-and-blood walls, and time bombs one by one. This is truly something that only a Super Intelligence using a God's-eye view could plan and guarantee to run so punctually, with such rhythm, and with KPIs fulfilled so accurately. Accurate, we just... I will say, "Listen, you have not implemented the consensus reached by our two heads of state, and this cannot be resolved simply by briefings." Therefore, this is tariff promotion under way. I believe that in this historic year, the leaders of the world's two most powerful nations finally held four summits—unprecedented in history—and at every summit we achieved substantive results. In Beijing, we established the Trade Committee and the Investment Committee, and as you said, this Trade Committee will eliminate tariffs on USD 30 billion worth of non-critical products. We always tell the Chinese side: our current premise is that we don't want risk containment, but brand risk containment. Both sides can completely complement each other; we export energy and agricultural products, and you export light industrial products. We cooperate and enjoy US tariff exemptions.

Based on the market demand and industrial interests of both sides, a reciprocal list of tariff-reduction products was formulated. The US side verified specific trade products, including daily necessities and holiday gifts, totaling approximately USD 30 billion worth of Chinese exported goods. This includes various domestic light industrial products. We verified this USD 30 billion tariff list, and both parties determined the specific products based on domestic market demands. Building on this, tariff exemption treatment was provided reciprocally, with over 90% of the products exempt from all mutual tariffs and enjoying US tariff reductions.

It seems to be related to the pet industry. Right? You see things about fish, and some things that should be feed for ornamental animals or pets; I guess that's what it is. Then there are all kinds of seafood—seafood is the big one—like Atlantic tuna, salmon, right? All that hype about Xinjiang salmon, freshwater salmon. Ah, now that you have this kind of salmon, who wants your Xinjiang salmon? Even if the princess herself comes out to hype it, it's useless. Right? All kinds of cod, Alaska pollock, chum salmon, and various shrimp, lobsters, even freshwater crayfish are imported from the United States. Isn't this something that China eats a lot of and farms itself? Just in the last two years, the crayfish craze has passed, and the prices have dropped, yet now we still have to buy them from the U.S. It's very obvious, look, Trump doesn't care if you really need it or not. Trump's main point is: I need to sell this to you, and our farmers are very happy, including the fishermen, right? It's all connected. In this regard, whether it's people engaged in fishing, seafood production, farming, or animal husbandry, they are all very happy. Even eggs have to be bought from the U.S. No wonder this list is so long, I'm hearing there's even this. Wow! The CCP is also importing unprocessed human hair and waste human hair from the U.S. What is this for? Is it for making wigs? Can someone tell me, is our CCP country short of human hair? Ah, I really feel that when I see this, I have a special feeling—of course, if I'm wrong you can correct me, but my impression is that it feels like the U.S. is forcing our head down, saying 'I'm selling this to you, and you have to buy it.'

Ah, and it also includes things like animal intestines, bladders, stomachs—all of these have to be bought. And the down used for filling down jackets, oh my, it's so long. Below that, there's things like snake skins, which should be used as raw materials for cosmetics, I suppose. And a lot of this food, all kinds of roses, mushroom mycelium, all being imported from the U.S., which means they should be seeds, right? Including these, and there's also a type of mining-related product, all being imported from the U.S. Garlic, garlic sprouts, these have to be imported too. Ah, isn't it said that when the CCP has a bumper harvest, things like garlic sprouts aren't in short supply? My god! Ah, no wonder the CCP just glosses over things on the surface, afraid that if we look closely, if we check carefully, we'll see all these are imports. All kinds of beans. Let's scroll down a bit, all kinds of mushrooms, dried mushrooms, dried daylilies, and so on. I feel like Americans eat far fewer of these dried mushrooms than we Chinese do. Yet unexpectedly, China is importing them from the U.S. And what about yams? Aren't these things that we Chinese eat all the time? They have to be imported from the U.S. too. Look at all these: cashews, Brazil nuts, walnuts, pine nuts. No wonder, how many farmers are waiting to make money? Trump thinks it's right. Once this $30 billion list is laid out, for Trump's midterm elections, the farmers—including the entire seafood, timber, and other industries—are all going to vote for Trump.

And look at this, fresh lychees, fresh longans. These two—I won't say anything else—are definitely Chinese foods. Because you eat these things, remember when we said that during the 2015 state banquet, Obama even had lychee sorbet made as a dessert for Xi. And that pumpkin mooncake. Lychees are rarely sold in American supermarkets now; usually, you find them more in Chinese supermarkets. In ordinary ones like Sam's or those chain supermarkets, including Costco, they are sold occasionally. And when they do sell them, they usually have to provide an explanation on the packaging, saying this is a fruit, how it should be eaten, and what its taste is like. These lychees now have to be imported from the U.S. too. Uh, he is really spending money on everything, see that? And later there's jasmine tea. I didn't misread that, did I? This is the Chinese import product list. Huh? I'm double-checking, everyone, you didn't misread it. These are two separate lists: the Chinese import list and the American import list. Why? Because when you look at the U.S. import list, the CCP didn't even translate that part. Let me show you this U.S. import product list. Let me show everyone this U.S. import...

Do you see that? The CCP has never translated what the U.S. is buying from China. But look at this, all kinds of tea—oolong, green, jasmine, black, Pu'er—these are all things China has to import from the U.S. I am truly shocked, because I only glanced at it before the show and didn't see it in such detail. This guy keeps pulling out this list; my god, can someone explain this to me? I'm a bit confused. I wonder if Xi even looked at this list; if he had, he would probably be confused too. Why would I sign this? And look at all these bamboo seeds. Besides American ginseng, there's also white peony root, pinellia, chuanxiong, fritillaria, cordyceps, chrysanthemum, astragalus—is traditional Chinese medicine being contracted out to the U.S. too? The entire supply of medicinal herbs is being contracted out. Well, that might be good news. We Chinese usually feel that domestic traditional Chinese medicine herbs are already contaminated with heavy metals or something. If we are buying so much from the U.S., well, you don't see this stuff in the U.S. outside of Chinese supermarkets. I suspect it's only sold in Chinese supermarkets or traditional Chinese medicine clinics. Now we have to import it from the U.S. If I look at the bright side, for us ordinary people in China, the quality should be better, unless they reprocess it and fumigate it with sulfur or something. And there's more here: kelp, seaweed—stuff that we have plenty of by the coast, stuff that just lies on the beach and nobody wants—this has to be imported too. Xi is truly expensive to the core. Oh, lotus seeds, I've never seen lotus seeds in the U.S. that didn't have Chinese writing on them. This has to be imported too? Oh my god, the more you look at this list, the more there is. I think everyone should study it.

There are all kinds of things, oil products, derivatives, etc. And below that, canned goods, eel, various types of fructose, glucose, and other sugar-related products. Also, pasta, rice noodles, vermicelli—my god, even vermicelli has to be imported from the U.S.? Is it the American version of Longkou vermicelli? And there's all sorts of other stuff: wheat, rusks, waffles, and things like ketchup, all of it. Then, looking further down, sesame seeds. The U.S. state dinner even mentioned that sesame seeds coated on sea bass represent China, right? Yet, it also has to be imported from the U.S. Oh my god, and cherries, strawberries, all have to be imported. And grape juice, apple juice—let's not even talk about anything else, but apple juice, isn't the apple production in Shandong enough for the Chinese people? It's evident that I wasn't wrong when I said they lost miserably. And then there are all kinds of seasoning powders, royal jelly products, seal oil, non-alcoholic beer, natural water, mineral water—all of these have to be bought from there. It is indeed very difficult to decouple and break the chains. After Trump and Xi signed the deal, apart from these mutual imports, other things could be decoupled, but overall, to save face for Xi, we each agreed to $30 billion in reciprocal products, so there was no decoupling. Xi can go out and brag again: "Look, I personally went to D.C. and prevented decoupling." I saw alcohol here, baijiu. I don't know if this refers to Laobaigan or Erguotou. If so, that's too exaggerated. Surely they won't have to buy Moutai from the U.S. one day? But there is Huangjiu (yellow wine), and Huangjiu is a Chinese liquor.

Right? The U.S. makes Huangjiu? I didn't even know that, and we have to import it from the U.S. Then below that, there are various things including oilseed cakes and dregs for feeding pigs. So, you have to buy the pigs from the U.S., buy the pig feed from the U.S., and then buy the canned pork and sausages made from those pigs from the U.S. as well. And tobacco has to be imported. Look, all kinds of tobacco imports. Isn't it said that the revenue of China Tobacco has dropped significantly compared to before? They say it's because the income of Chinese people is too low now, and many have voluntarily quit smoking, but you still have to import so much tobacco from the U.S. Look at that, just look at it. And as for the rest, I've already mentioned it. There are also various medical sweeteners that should be imported from the U.S. Honestly, the same goes for antibiotics and other imported drugs; they are definitely better in quality than domestic Chinese ones. At least their quality control passes. Whether they are safe or have side effects is another matter; the CCP's stuff has both side effects and failed quality control.

Even toothpaste and soap are being imported. How does it seem like the CCP's own industries have disappeared? All these things are being imported from the U.S., and they are still importing $30 billion worth.

Photography equipment—that's understandable. But metal-related products, plastics, plastic boxes? Isn't that what the CCP said? "If you start a trade war with me, I'll make sure you have no plastic boxes to use." I remember the CCP bragging about that. And all kinds of sheepskin, etc. Oh, and I don't even need to mention the timber; timber was the big one I just talked about, all kinds of timber. Look, there are so many pages.

Including all kinds of these processed density boards and so on. What else is in here? Come to think of it, hasn't the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) state been—I've seen many videos saying that now with this trade war going on, all those finishing and decoration industries surrounding real estate, including this infrastructure industry and so on, are closing down one after another, going bankrupt, and are in a state of extreme desolation. Now Xi Jinping swings his big pen and imports so many raw materials. Then once you import them, you have to be able to sell the finished products after making them. Originally, you didn't rely on the domestic market; you relied entirely on external ones. The problem is that the United States doesn't want your goods now, ah, and the European Union is also talking to you about tariffs, not letting you dump your products. I want to know where you are going to sell the things you make after importing these materials. Wool has to be imported, cashmere has to be imported, ah, including hemp, ah, including manicuring supplies, ah?

Wait, pedicures and manicures—wait, this stuff is also being bought in? Is this—this is not an US import list, I'm telling you all, this is from the Ministry of Commerce of the CCP state. Go look for it yourselves, it was issued by the Ministry of Commerce; this is China's imported product list.

I've said it repeatedly, I didn't get it wrong, because there are two versions, one Chinese and one English, so it can't be wrong. It's just that the CCP state is bullying everyone into not reading carefully. Anyone who actually gets serious and takes a closer look would be dumbfounded, right, ah?

There are also all kinds of gears, adapters, and things like ultrasound, ah, this kind of MRI equipment, which is normal, right? From diagnostic equipment to endoscopes, to writing instruments, to anesthesia, this stuff really—as we tell the people, you have to trust the US, you wouldn't dare casually trust the CCP state's.

Ah, including artificial joints, cardiac pacemakers, and so on. See that? Ah, this finally says, the tariff item number of the Customs Import and Export Tariff of the People's Republic of China is right here. Look, see? I'm not joking with you, ah, everyone go check it for yourselves.

Well, since the CCP state is importing so much stuff, whether it's useful or not, I have a feeling that you have to spend 30 billion USD with me, ah, anyway, I'll just list these items for you, and you can figure out the combination yourselves, how much of each.

Right? If you want to buy my weapons, ah, buy my chips, ah, buy my high-end and cutting-edge goods, I won't give you a single one. Ah, the one with the highest technological content here, I think, should be the MRI equipment,

what's this, including surgical instruments and the like. Right? Everything else is extremely universal stuff, things you could practically dig right out of the ground or pick up off the dirt 50 years ago. Ah, well, it's like you—you simply have to come over and spend 30 billion USD with me.

No, people are saying this is to fool the United States—regardless of whether it fools the US or not, what the US wants is your 30 billion USD, you pay up for my war chest, because right now, even if you don't fight this war for me, it's fine, you can fool around all you want here,

and after fooling around, right, anyway, first of all, this list was hammered out by both sides; surely Xi didn't hammer it out personally, Xi is just the one who signed and sealed it. When the lower levels hammered it out, no matter what intentions you harbored, what the US wants is

that we signed this contract, I will definitely give you the goods, ah, and you must definitely give me the money. If you dare to stiff me on this account, then I'm sorry, we'll calculate interest and penalties for you. I'm telling you, the US is not in a rush,

understand? Right now, if the CCP defaults, the US government itself, ah, will fill in that 30 billion first, and then turn around to demand five or ten times that amount from the CCP, right? And then after opening up China,

this time—back when the Qing dynasty was opened up, didn't we all learn about it in middle school textbooks? It's called the Open Door Policy. So now, Open up China sounds no different; as for how they beat them back then, they can only beat them harder now,

right? This kind of beating just makes silver pour out, so I'm saying Xi is like a piggy bank, isn't he? Right? So everyone doesn't need to worry about this. Hey, to tell the truth, medical supplies will certainly be reserved for high-ranking cadres first, ah, for those with connections first. That's the reality,

isn't it? Well, who among us doesn't know this reality in the CCP state, ah? But the advantage is that once they are imported, some of it will trickle out from between the fingers, and ordinary people will also have a chance to get a share of the benefits,

right? Otherwise, where would you even begin to talk about it? If it weren't imported, you wouldn't even have this little bit, ah. But you might say, doesn't he want to buy something a bit more high-end with that 30 billion? The US won't allow it; it's designed to let you spread the wealth evenly.

The list given to you here equates to Trump's votes, equating to American voters who need this trade. Understand? It's not based on whether you need it or not. The US has people selling nail clippers here, selling hair here, right, selling pig offal here,

Hey! As president, he is selling those out for them. This is the complete difference between a democratic country and a dictatorship, isn't it? Then let's look at this—this US import list that they didn't dare to translate, what on earth is this?

I'll show you these four pages of the list. This isn't as long as the CCP state's list; the import list of the CCP state, look, the items go up to over 1,600 entries, ah, there are so many kinds of things because they wrote it in detail, right?

As for the United States, there are a total of nearly 77 categories, which also include items with very detailed sub-classifications. What is this about? When I took a look, oh my god, basically the vast majority of these are holiday decorations and gifts that I mentioned.

Let me classify them for you. Right at the beginning, you see holiday fireworks, firewalls—wait, firework. Importing this kind of stuff from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is fine. Then, following that, kitchenware and plastic tableware form one category, including all kinds of disposable tableware, vertical ones, or some large and small plates used in the kitchen. Then, there is bedding, such as electric blankets, stiff bedsheets, crocheted tablecloths, and such things. Then there are plastic beads, specifically designated as handicrafts used for decoration, for example. Next, there are patio umbrellas used in the garden and large beach umbrellas.

There are fake flowers and artificial plants used for indoor decoration. What is hilarious is that you know how detailed the US description is. It even includes household scales—meaning those used for weighing babies and adults—explicitly stating they must be for home and personal use only. I don't know why commercial versions of this item cannot be imported from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) into the US; is it due to a lack of trust or what? Also, what about kitchens? Household appliances, not commercial ones, with explicit specifications for various juicers and the like—such as Midea-style small household kitchen equipment or soy milk makers. Let me tell you, such items have no competitiveness once they arrive in the US. The US allows you to import these, but whether you can sell them after import is another story. If these same items don't follow a low-price strategy in the US, then you don't even need to talk about anything else. Just look at how many choices of coffee machines there are in the US! When someone in a family wants to buy one, they buy something of good quality that can last a long time. To be honest, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) really has no competitive advantage in the market regarding this aspect.

Furthermore, what else is in here? Things for personal use, like hair shavers or flashlights, which also count as a category. There are also the small lights hung on Christmas trees, with an explicit listing that these can be imported. What is the most hilarious part? When it comes to baby-related supplies, an 'X' is specifically marked on them. Below the items marked with an 'X', an explanation is provided stating that when you import these items marked with 'X' into the US, you must be careful and strictly follow the descriptions given by the White House. If you say the category marked with 'X'—what you bought is not the exact description strictly given by the White House—then you see, items marked with 'X', those marked with crosses, if you buy the wrong ones, they won't count for you. Understand? Prohibited from import or subject to high tariffs. What are all these 'X' categories? For example, one of them is children's high chairs and booster seats with metal frames and soft cushions, or baby walkers with metal frames and soft cushions, or baby jumpers with metal frames and soft cushions. I guess this might be to prevent things like Pinduoduo-style items. These do not meet infant usage standards, so when importing, the US government specifically lists their basic standards first. For example, if it's not a metal frame and you make a plastic frame instead, and the quality is poor, they might not let you import it. If the child gets injured because it breaks after being used a couple of times, whose fault is it?

Also, sleeping bags, pillows are fine—meaning cushions can be used and can be imported. As for toys, things like small puzzles, I guess things like Labubu might be acceptable, but—ah, it is specially emphasized that the toy category does not include commodities equipped with radio frequency, Wi-Fi, Ethernet, or Bluetooth functions. Products. In other words, as long as it has a slight tech component—we aren't even talking about what kind of tech component. But the US feels that if it carries a Bluetooth function or Wi-Fi, what if you end up using it as a tool to hack the US? This stuff just won't be allowed to be imported with reciprocal tariff reductions. See that? The US has learned its lesson now and has piled everything outside—blocking the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from trying to install communication equipment everywhere inside toys, or using this method to covertly collect living information of American households, even including two- or three-year-old kids. Right? So, toys with communication functions are not allowed.

And then, what about billiards supplies, parts for pool tables, Christmas festival decorations, or something like badminton rackets, soccer balls, fishing supplies such as fish hooks, or artist paintbrushes? These things can be specifically imported. But—but, there is a fun catch: it says that the imported artist paintbrushes, writing pens, and makeup brushes used for drawing makeup must each be valued at no more than five cents. Another category is that those exceeding five cents but not exceeding ten cents can also be used. See that? I am not making this up; look at it yourselves, these are the original words. 5 cents or between 5 cents and 10 cents.

Just look at this thing, when it's imported, it costs five cents or at most ten cents each. That's less than one yuan in RMB. How much volume is the CCP exporting of this stuff? Only when the ordinary people get their hands on running these factories can they make any money.

Right? If they skim a little bit of money off the top, they won't even let you leave the factory or export it, so you have to find other markets yourself. My god, and there's even this thermos, a vacuum-insulated container, they even have regulations for this.

It's either under one liter or under two liters. They don't want the big ones. Wow, exactly. It seems like all high-tech products are screened out. Yes, yes. And is this just for the holidays?

Christmas, Easter, right, and then Halloween, these kinds of things. You can just buy and sell these things here easily. I feel like half the stuff in those small commodity markets in Yiwu or Guangzhou can't even be sold here. Do you see it now? If you really have time and are interested, go compare these two lists. Once you compare them, I believe you'll understand why the CCP didn't even bother to translate the list of things the U.S. imports from China.

It's truly embarrassing. Look at what you buy from the U.S. and what the U.S. buys from you. Seriously, the year before last, the Xi-CCP was still having everyone spam the screens saying, 'If the U.S. starts a trade war with me, you won't be able to celebrate Christmas, you won't even be able to wear socks.'

But, I'm telling you, there was no mention of tax cuts for importing Chinese socks here. The U.S. really is like, 'I don't care about your socks.' See? I couldn't find any clothing products in here. There are some bedding items,

right? In other words, most of the things here are for holidays, either for decoration or for gifts. My god, for those companies in China engaged in exports and foreign trade, if you can't open up the market domestically,

first of all, don't pin your hopes on the EU, because you won't have many days left before the crackdown, as the EU is catching up very quickly. Secondly, regarding the U.S. market, let me put it this way: if you feel like you're shutting down, you can try to hang on,

but you at least have to hang on until 'open up China.' Otherwise, at this rate, you'll be dead before you ever get another chance to return to the export profits of the past. Who let Xi stand in the way like that?

And with this, no wonder the entire Xinhua News Agency's eight-point consensus was finished off in one night. Look, compare the fact sheet released by the White House, right? The interpretation on the day Xi left was very long, and then there's the list released today.

To be honest, I was doing a show with an American this morning, and I said, it looks like both sides have an eight-point statement, but I said this is not a joint statement; this is both sides talking past each other.

There are basically only two points here that aren't problematic. One is that both sides said they would meet again on each other's home turf this year. The other is that the giant panda is going to the U.S., and the U.S. welcomes it, and the CCP is also happy to send it. It's like the ancient practice of 'heqin' (marriage alliance), now it's sending giant pandas plus heqin. This 'plus heqin' is what we call Ms. Chen, the mother of Yangyang, right, who went to Qatar.

So, you look at this and you know why, after Xi went back, the CCP racked its brains to brag about it to the heavens. Because if you don't brag, if you don't use that propaganda to brainwash everyone, if the people in China just dryly looked at these last two lists, anyone slightly smart would see how miserably Xi lost this time. It's too ridiculous.

And then, let's talk about another major event today, the Fairford Air Base incident. I can't say today, it's been a major event over the last two days. When I did my show yesterday, I thought it was the joint British-American air base in Greece. Later, after the show, I went back to watch the morning show from Lude Media, and I realized, oh, it's actually Fairford in the UK. That changes things, because you remember I mentioned in my show before that a few months ago, there were terrorists lurking around the British air base in Greece, some were even caught, and there were even leaks from inside. That air base in Greece is at least something the British themselves need to use, but the significance of Fairford is different. Fairford Air Base is a place where British bombers aren't permanently stationed; it's basically a place for the U.S. military to manage.

It is a daily routine, you see, the headquarters of the U.S. Air Force 501st Combat Support Wing and the 420th Air Base Squadron are located here. Moreover, it is known as the U.S. military's preferred forward operating base for bombers in Europe. This includes the 420th Squadron, which is also responsible for receiving, housing, and supporting U.S. and NATO forces deployed here. The last time we discussed this base on our show was in February of this year, before that incident where Iran was bombed, right? When the war with Iran broke out, do you remember that Starmer refused to let the U.S. use the Fairford base on their home soil? That is this one. Trump directly said, 'I will remember this; you treat the U.S. like this, right?' and then said he would downgrade relations between the U.S. and the UK, and so on. Trump even scolded Starmer directly. Then, by March, Starmer finally bowed to pressure and changed his stance, saying, 'Okay, you can use our base, but while you use it, your B-1s and B-52s can take off, but we ourselves will not send troops.' At that time, the UK was saying that they agreed to let the U.S. use this base for defensive strikes, but the British military itself would not participate in the fight against Iran, nor would it participate in any operations.

Right? But in reality, the U.S. didn't need to bring the UK along to play this game at all; all the U.S. wanted at the time was to use the base. As long as you let me use it, because if I take off from here—you have to understand, why is the location of this air base so important? Let me put it this way: if this base were destroyed in this terrorist attack, well, previously Starmer wanted to block the U.S. from using it, and if it's not allowed to be used, it's actually quite similar to it being destroyed and having no base to use, right? Even if the facilities aren't destroyed, you completely lose that geographical advantage and so on.

However, if this air strike—look, three vehicles carrying explosives, right—causes damage, the consequences would be truly immeasurable. Because let me explain this base to you in detail: this base is equivalent to the only forward deployment base for heavy bombers in Europe that possesses full operational capabilities for the U.S. Its strategic value can be said to be irreplaceable. If this air strike were successful and paralyzed the base, let me tell you this: first, you have to know that not only are there B-1Bs and B-52s, but B-2s are also at this base. So these aircraft might have all been destroyed, right? And there are also tankers and so on; these would also have problems. Then, without this base, you would have to return to the mainland to take off. If you return to the mainland, like in the case of Iran, you would have to carry out missions across the Atlantic, right? And every one-way mission

Your flight time—now you go to bomb, ah, do you remember that sometimes on our show we show everyone those flight paths that people track online, and discover, 'Oh, the U.S. military has another B-1 taking off from Fairford or something to perform some mission'? You are adding 7 to 10 hours to a one-way trip, and you also have to add the constant mid-air refueling from tankers. The direct impact on combat efficiency and the physical exhaustion of the pilots—how much is that, right? Combat efficiency would drop significantly. And look at why they used three trucks loaded with explosives: because this base has a special ammunition depot of extremely high scale and specifications, containing precision-guided weapons and heavy bunker-buster bombs. If this were destroyed by a terrorist attack, causing the entire ammunition depot to explode or something, then let me just say this: the supply of conventional precision-strike munitions for the U.S. military in the entire European region, regardless of how much U.S. domestic production capacity increases now, would at least have a huge gap for weeks, months, or very likely, according to previous calculation methods, conservatively speaking, even years. This would immediately drag down the U.S. whether it is fighting in the Middle East or targeting the CCP in the Pacific region.

Doesn't that create a vacuum in military strength? Isn't the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) currently shouting and carrying on, using all those things like the Frozen Chosin (Ice Sculpture Company) and Huang Jiguang, just trying to force the United States—especially by weakening its military forces in the Pacific and Indian Ocean directions? And look, previously the United States had a dual-line deployment in Guam and Fairford, right? Then the Atlantic and Pacific could flexibly transition and share the pressure together. Once this Fairford base is crippled, it means the Indo-Pacific bases will have to bear all the combat readiness pressure from a single point, right? In this case, besides creating a vacuum, won't everything you have left there—whether it's logistics, ammunition reserves, or even routine maintenance—face overloaded operations? Ah, so what the United States currently focuses on next is clearly enhancing its rapid reaction capability in the Pacific through continuous military training and troop deployments. Papas mentioned in multiple speeches last year and this year, which we've all discussed in our Mudershe programs, emphasizing the rapid reaction capability of the U.S. military. Ah, but if this base is destroyed, your rapid reaction capability is essentially directly shaken, isn't it? Moreover, although they say that if the U.S. doesn't use this base, it can refuel in the air—doesn't it use many aerial tankers? Then with a longer range later on, it might not be a major problem. But you have to know that without this Fairford base, right? It cannot take off from these places. Then you can imagine every time it refuels, the bomber has to take off from the homeland, and this means the tanker has to take off from the homeland too. Furthermore, during this process, the damage to the tankers and the demand for fuel are also very high.

When you originally didn't need to give fuel, now you have to carry fuel over. Originally your usage—the U.S. military makes precise calculations. After calculating, now your tankers and fuel might both end up in a state of not being able to keep up, right? Not to mention the cognitive warfare triggered within this. In terms of public opinion, the U.S. military is already controlling the Strait of Hormuz over in Iran, oil is flowing to the United States every day, and Iran is already in a finished state. Even under this condition, the CCP, Iran, and those mainstream media outlets are still running down the United States every day, saying, "Oh, you don't even have those Patriot missiles, and your base was blown up by Iran again." Ah, you don't believe the Strait of Hormuz is controlled by Iran? If this incident happens later, and it happens in the UK, right? Once reporters go over there, organizations like the BBC, Reuters, and all those micro-explosives ones—they already look unfavorably upon the Trump administration, and even the British government itself doesn't support you fighting Iran. Oh my god. That public opinion—they must be overjoyed. Yes, as audience members said, isn't this just a Pearl Harbor-style attempted airstrike? That's exactly what it is, and even more terrifying than that. Therefore, in this situation, look, didn't Mudershe tell everyone early this morning that although five people were caught, right? And then talking about all kinds of exploration, ah look, including putting bomb disposal robots directly at the scene, ah, and also confirming that the five arrested suspects are British citizens in their 20s. But do you know what fact was just updated this afternoon? British counter-terrorism police actually announced, ah, that these five men have been released on bail. Saying, ah, of course, London police said that this bail has strict restrictions on movement and contact, ah, our investigation is still ongoing, ah, because they were arrested before—wasn't it yesterday, the 27th, British time, that they were arrested, on the 26th or 27th?

This is a total of 48 hours at most. According to British law, an attempted terrorist attack can lead to—well, investigations related to terrorist attacks can result in detention for up to 14 days. I was even thinking, detention for 14 days, two whole weeks, that's so much! Especially in a world like the United States, especially in cases where people are caught red-handed, right? Of course you can say we need to collect evidence, we need to do this and that, but once you get into the United States, you don't even need such terrorists—someone like Guo Wengui, who thought he was putting on an act, how perfect he thought he was, they didn't grant him bail either, did they? Neither Wang Qishan nor Guo Wengui was let out on bail. Right? And yet Britain actually released all five of these guys on bail. Hey, who gave them the money? Who paid their bail? Who is their defense lawyer? Ah, it is said to be...

British police told the media that because it has not yet been determined whether Iran or other countries were involved, the current direction of the investigation is whether someone acted on behalf of certain foreign countries knowingly or unknowingly. However, our evidence at present may be insufficient, their lawyers made a lot of sense, so they were granted bail, while emphasizing that the investigation is still ongoing and those released on bail have strict movement and contact restrictions.

What movement and contact restrictions? To be honest, these few people are all risking their lives, and there is no need for them to go to the trouble of fleeing right now. Once he gets out, as for his movements and contacts with others, can you actually restrict that sort of thing? If you could restrict it, would three large trucks have been prepared without you even noticing? In the end, the U.S. led this matter, and he got arrested. Oh, my goodness, really, as soon as this matter came out, early this morning right after the UK announced it, reporters went straight to ask Trump. They asked, the suspect in Fairford has been released, what do your thoughts on this? Trump directly said, if it were me, I wouldn't have let them out on bail. They let these people go, which surprised me, and I definitely wouldn't have done that. Then Trump also said, they have been cooperating very closely with us, regarding this matter, we have all the information. See that? That means Trump made it clear that the U.S. will not allow such terrorist attack suspects to be released.

However, even though the UK cooperates with the U.S. and understands the situation, it is on British soil and governed by British jurisprudence. Why do people say Trump is now going to set straight those in the Middle East who use British law? Things like maritime law, insurance law, including you overseas oil-producing countries. The U.S. has to fight Iran to pull all of you into the Abraham Accords framework, or follow the U.S. into the U.S.'s new energy landscape. Look at that, isn't this example enough to show everyone how weak the UK has become? Under their laws, regarding a complete terrorist attack—Lude Media specifically did a show talking about how the law says terrorist attacks surpass everything else—they didn't expect that surpassing everything else applied to the British authorities as well. They directly downgrade it by orders of magnitude, it's terrifying. The whole British Commonwealth is... no wonder the CCP clings to the Commonwealth. No wonder that Carney, or that Penny Wong, help the CCP with such full confidence; they truly have no scruples whatsoever. American reporters are even saying it's too crazy, this whole thing, right? Speaking of this, we have to mention, everyone, haven't I consistently recommended that you watch shows like *The Bureau*? Because they are all adapted from real events. In this new season of *The Bureau*, just to give a slight spoiler, it talks about why, after Hamas killed people on October 7, they went to France and were able to settle in large numbers in Marseille, and furthermore obtain legal asylum status there.

Working there, getting married, starting a family, and even plotting terrorist attacks there without anyone arresting them. The show directly states that the French intelligence department has people bought off by them, and whatever the intelligence department here is investigating... moreover, because Israel, through Shin Bet, tracked this matter all the way to France. The Israeli official side stepped up to cooperate and negotiate this matter with France, and they had the people and the evidence right in hand, but the French side sent out the national intelligence personnel participating in the investigation in the show—who was bought off by Hamas. So this person's attitude was: what gives you Israelis the right to come to our France and undermine our French territorial integrity? Why should we listen just because you say you want to arrest him? You have evidence, well, we don't have evidence on our hands. Did you understand? That's how they play the game.

He truly misses meeting with Xi. Let's all look at this picture first. Ah, in this picture of Xi bowing and scraping, I'd say it's just muscle memory, huh? His legs are bent too. Didn't Xi specially wear elevator shoes to be as tall as Trump? After Trump finished speaking, look at Xi's posture. Isn't this fittingly like a eunuch wearing a dragon robe who sometimes still hasn't completely forgotten his muscle memory from back in the day, automatically displaying that eunuch-like temperament the moment he sees someone powerful? This morning when someone, a friend sent this to me, my first reaction when I saw it was: is this some AI image made by someone online, then deliberately claimed to have been posted by Trump so everyone could have a good laugh? As a result, I ran to check Trump's original source and searched it, oh my god, it actually exists, ah, right? How is this different from extortion? You tell me, how many good pictures are there that shouldn't be posted? You tell me, Trump posting this picture, what does it mean? Who dares to post this picture back to the mainland, who can post it back to the mainland, let me ask you. If Xinhua News Agency captured a picture like this, wouldn't they rush to secretly destroy it? Look at how vivid it is. Why else do we say Trump, Modi, and these people really know how to play these social media games, right? So I'm telling you, Modi specifically posted him holding Xi's left hand and Putin's right hand, including Modi making Xi stare at that little watering can, ah, right? Looking timid and sneaky like a little boy peeing, that was one hundred percent intentional.

As we've been saying month after month, diplomacy has no coincidences, and Mr. Ye has also said there are no accidental slips. If ordinary people go out to a party and take a photo, heavily Photoshopping themselves while leaving others un-edited, posting a picture where they look gorgeous while everyone else is pulling weird faces, that alone has the potential to ruin friendships in your circle of friends. How could such a thing happen in diplomacy? So it can only mean this was intentional, hey, this picture is too classic, really. Besides this, there are others, for example, another one—Trump posted close to ten pictures, maybe seven or eight of them. Look at this one, ah, take a look, not a single word needed. This is outside the White House, with the CCP's delegation behind them, and two translators brought by the Chinese side standing next to them. Just look at the body language between Trump and Xi: who is dominant, and who is obediently listening, ah? Body language speaks louder than words; absolutely no words are needed at all.

Alright, besides that, let's talk about the main point of Trump's posts. He posted about seven or eight consecutive photos. Let me see if I can find them and go through them for you. Half of them, look, half of them, including this one, are about that granite helipad. Because this one is that helipad, you see? Then, moving down, let me see if our screen is moving now. Yes, it is. Alright, then moving down, look, this is the one we just showed. The next one is the granite helipad again, the helicopter he was supposedly visiting, right? Trump is explaining the granite to Xi. The next one is still Trump standing on the granite talking to Xi. The next one, the background is still granite. Look, everyone, and this is the fifth one. This is definitely, as we say, the background is still the White House granite helipad. And then here, a photo of these people watching a military parade together. The parade shows American military power, right? Look at Xi's expression, he doesn't look very happy. And then a symbolic photo of everyone looking thoughtful. How is there another granite helipad photo? And then, changing the angle, how many are there? Seven or eight, right? After that, he puts up a photo of Xi bowing and scraping, right? And then adds two more to set the scene. See? This isn't just ten, it's over a dozen photos.

Half of them are granite. Hmm, Trump said Xi understands granite, and we talked about it on our show yesterday. It seems Xi really does understand granite, right? Then, right after the show, the Nomi group found that clip from our 2024 Lude Media. That's why we say the intel from Ray is abundant; sometimes we forget details after we've talked about them. Look, Lude Media, September 28, 2024, exactly two years ago today, what did that tweet say? Hezbollah Secretary-General Nasrallah was eliminated at that time, and today is the two-year anniversary; Hezbollah is still commemorating him. It said Khamenei and Xi Jinping are scared and hiding. Old Khamenei is still alive. According to our intel from Ray, inside a certain mountain on the Iranian plateau, there is a bunker command center with at least 500 meters of granite, plus 300 meters of reinforced concrete, and at least two meters of steel structure. I told you yesterday, Iran has granite mountains, but not all of them are. They don't have the vast areas of granite mountains that the CCP's China has. And it's rumored that a bunker command center of this level was also dug in a certain mountain in Guizhou. See? Our intel from two years ago, now, look, granite, granite. I tell you, Americans aren't really discussing this 'granite' meme much, because they are already happy enough just watching Les Misérables, watching the B-2, watching that eagle. Like the 'Ikusutianfan' (referring to the US-Taiwan defense treaty), and the Treaty of San Francisco, Americans can understand those, but things like 'Ikusutianfan', they don't really get it. The 'granite' meme is definitely something Americans haven't really figured out either, so Trump specifically made it the theme of his posts today to let everyone see, granite. And don't you think it's funny? I told you yesterday, why I said the Cheyenne Mountain Complex of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, they have granite, but it's not just the credit of the granite. I told you, it includes anti-nuclear, anti-electromagnetic, and all sorts of other high-tech content. Why do you think Trump says Xi Jinping is a granite expert, a material expert?

Doesn't he mean that Xi, this blockhead, only recognizes rocks? He thinks that if he has granite, if he has rocks, if he has granite, reinforced concrete, and thick steel, he can save his life. He doesn't think about the fact that without those high-tech defensive functions and those, this, this isn't called decoration, it's called those materials, how could the Cheyenne Mountain granite become the world's number one defensive fortress? So that's it, he really only recognizes granite, right? Dig a tunnel and think that having granite makes you very powerful. Get CCTV to really brag about the Dongfeng missiles rising from the granite, right? And then pair it with this tweet from exactly two years ago. My god, don't over-interpret it. Right? There's really no way to say more about this, it's too funny, too funny. And by the way, why I said the UK side feels there's a big problem, let's say one more word, Israel even tweeted, saying the Revolutionary Guard had long ago stated that Fairford Air Force Base was their target for attack. This is the official Mossad account, which specifically emphasized this fact today, saying the Revolutionary Guard officially issued a warning in July, stating that any base used to invade Iranian territory is a legitimate target, right? But the UK is saying here that they haven't investigated it yet, and they still won't admit it, this can be shot down.

Let me tell you, there is a point here that we didn't get to cover before. Hey, I think we should brainstorm a bit. Everyone, take the big picture and really think about the connections here. Ah, we are just brainstorming, okay? I'm not drawing any conclusions. Just being politically correct. You look at the time of the UN General Assembly, the new British Prime Minister Starmer came to the United States, and Trump held a meeting with him. This meeting was very brief, and Trump didn't mention much about it himself. The only thing Trump said to reporters after the meeting was that, ah, since Starmer took office, our relationship with the UK is better than before. Ah, then he said that the UK will hand over the Chagos Islands, including the Diego Garcia base, to Mauritius, and then lease the base back, and Trump characterized this agreement—again, characterizing it after the UN meeting—as terrible. So, after the meeting, the BBC went to ask Starmer, saying, ah, so the US says this agreement is terrible, does that mean the agreement is already dead? Actually, we mentioned a while ago that the US had already rejected it, right? And the UK couldn't push it forward either. But Starmer still said, ah, the UK is trying to find a solution between different aspects. Ah, he said he established a good relationship with Trump during this meeting, and hopes to find a solution through cooperation with the US. This means that the current British Labour government represented by Lammy—although Starmer is not in the position, they haven't given up on this humiliating agreement to return the entire Chagos Islands to Mauritius. They are still trying to find opportunities to get it done first.

Now, as we just mentioned, if there is a problem with the Fairford Air Force Base, the Diego Garcia base in the Chagos Islands would be equivalent to Guam, right? This would create a power vacuum, and then it would reach an ultra-complex logistics load, putting the entire deployment and transport of US global forces under immense pressure, becoming a vulnerable link. Suddenly, the overall military strength is damaged. And look, on one side, the Fairford Air Force Base was almost attacked by terrorists, and on the other side, the UK still hasn't given up on handing over the joint base Diego Garcia to Mauritius, and then helping the CCP further, right? Facilitating the CCP's infiltration, and then after that, you go to lease it back and do what? Being held hostage by others, and making the entire base completely insecure. Hey, you connect these things and think about it. Plus, today they released those terrorists, right? And it's not just releasing them, isn't there news that they were released early? Ah, the person who reported the police said that the Labour Party doesn't care about this at all, the Ministry of Defence doesn't answer the phone, the ministers don't answer the phone, and after coming out, Lammy just issues some clichés, right? And tells everyone not to speculate. On the other hand, the farmer who reported the police is 100% sure he saw eight to ten men, not five, and the police haven't contacted him to ask about the situation yet, which is very shocking. And these five have already been released.

I have to brainstorm and speculate with the worst-case scenario: is there someone in this Labour government, including the royal family, secretly cooperating? That's why this Labour government is so bold. On this matter, do you really care about this terrorist attack? Do you care about the UK's national security? Or is there actually a group of people here calculating, just like that Okinawa governor Denny Tamaki wanted to drive the US military base out of Okinawa, or like the KMT period when they turned a blind eye and drove the US military out of China, wanting to completely pull out these bases where the US and UK cooperate? Hey, you look at it from another angle. At the time, Starmer defied the world and insisted on going against the US, wanting to play with the use of the air base, but didn't stop it. After taking office, the new Lammy replaced Starmer. He didn't stop it; as soon as he took office, he said you can continue to use it. But then, regarding the Chagos Islands, he is also determined to return it to Mauritius and the CCP. Ah, and after the terrorist attack happened, right? Besides speaking some official clichés, he is also stalling. I tell you, if it weren't for the fact that the US itself is responsible for this—didn't I just say that the 420th Air Base Squadron is responsible for security matters—this terrorist attack could absolutely happen. Because the whole monitoring responsibility outside the UK, Anthony, didn't you say there should be AI or something? UK, how did you handle it? I'm asking you how you handled it. Let me put it this way: if the UK had even turned a blind eye to look at the outside of this air base, how could they have missed three vehicles and eight to ten terrorists that the farmer saw? I am very worried about the farmer's safety now. Ah, will his identity be leaked? Will he be retaliated against?

How did they manage to prepare so calmly before getting arrested, and then get bailed out just two days after the arrest? So fast, right? Many of the CCP's secret agents and accomplices who get arrested in mainland China don't get bailed out that quickly. And does Britain seem to be taking this matter very seriously? Think about what we told you before: in South Korea, Lee Jae-myung went to all lengths to protect the interests of the CCP, doing everything he could to protect those sent by the CCP as spies, fearing heavily that a harsh sentence would break the hearts of these operatives. As a result, whether it was the U.S. military base or the joint military drill base, they had to rely on the U.S. to take the lead in capturing these spies.

And after the arrest, right on the heels of that, South Korea was like, Oh, this one is a minor; oh, that one is a tourist; oh, just lock this one up for a few months and that's enough; just send the money back and return them to their country. Isn't that how it went? And then think about Taiwan. Taiwan before, especially before the Tsai administration, oh boy, Chiu Kuo-cheng—my goodness, apart from the time he lashed out at us at the Lude Media, popping up within twenty-four hours, completely reckless, and pouring a load of dirty water on us—apart from that one time, I’ve never seen Chiu Kuo-cheng react so quickly to anything else. Well, he was pretty quick when it came to the U.S., wasn't he?

And as for those who swaggered into Taiwan to infiltrate, including those inside and outside military camps and the Presidential Office, they were treated with utmost care, as if people were afraid they would melt if held in the palm of a hand or shatter if cradled in arms. Right? Doesn't it feel that way? The vibe is right, isn't it? So regarding this British incident, just watch: given all these statements and reactions, Trump made it very clear today that he is extremely dissatisfied. Although you British say you were making trouble at this base, right at the last moment—not that Britain as a whole made trouble, I mean these people in Britain, including those civic terrorists who are British citizens, right?—they were making trouble there, and at the last minute, the U.S. thwarted it, so it didn't succeed.

Yet you always get the feeling that some people over there actually don't care about this matter at all. On the contrary, after the incident, under Biden, there was a desperate attempt to cover for them and spin the narrative. So could it be that among those five suspects who were released on bail, several might suddenly end up dead outside? Huh? It's hard to say—they might suddenly be silenced, right? Anyway, regarding this whole matter, but I can tell you, Trump now keeps emphasizing that the U.S. has everything under control and that we have been keeping an eye on this situation all along. Trump is cracking the whip here, just like when he stood in front of Xi and mentioned Hua Chunying, right? So someone who doesn't know the situation would hear that and think he's just talking about that ordinary stuff, but was it really just that simple?

So look at Britain now—first, it's the issue of the Falkland Islands with Argentina, back on the table over the disputed points, and then it's questions about whether Northern Ireland wants independence, right? Will the whole of Britain break apart? Hmm, I feel that last year we were still looking at Britain's reaction, right? At least at the beginning when we started talking about Britain's political system and all, we still held some hope. But later we discovered a series of clumsy, disastrous operations by Britain, coupled with the Confucius Institutes and so on. Basically, by now, I sometimes can't even be bothered to bring up the British side; just mentioning it in passing is enough.

Just watch: right now, there's this underlying momentum in Britain, and goodness knows how deep it goes within the royal family. If the royal family is like this, then certainly Britain's nobles, lawmakers, national security personnel, and—let me tell you, if you watch American TV dramas, you'll see characters who seem to be allies, but the people inside are actually helping America's enemies, right? They can even say, 'I'm doing this for our own national security; if the U.S. uses our bases to strike Iran, Iran will retaliate against us Americans—no, against us British. We have so many Muslims here; we have to consider our votes and social stability.' And so under this circumstance, they find a way to chase you Americans away. See? They can justify themselves using that exact reason.

So really, although I'm just brainstorming and I don't want this to become reality, looking at the current situation, Britain's rotten-to-the-core reality is probably even deeper than we previously imagined. But as for the U.S., strength decides everything. Why else would Trump say something about AI that doesn't sound very pleasant—he calls it SI, right? Super-Intelligence. Indeed, it can keep everything in sight and face this situation so calmly, including the criminals being released on bail. Could it be that when Trump says everything is under control, the U.S. is currently watching, knowing you would pull this stunt, and just watching to see who behind the scenes is conniving with these terrorists? That's entirely possible, so this situation is well worth watching.

Right? Then let's talk about Putin. Oh, it's very interesting. On September 25, right after Xi left, when Putin was attending a joint cultural forum in St. Petersburg, a reporter asked him a question, and it was caught on camera. The reporter asked him, Trump and Xi Jinping just met in Washington; do you feel jealous? Well, Putin said that word is not right. Jealousy, he said, belongs to private emotions between men and women—well, maybe the word for jealousy in Russian leans more heavily toward purely private emotions between men and women. He said such words should not be used in politics. Russia welcomes negotiations between the United States and China because these outstanding outcomes can bring results, including results favorable to the Russian economy. And then he specifically mentioned that we have a very important joint development project with China. He said we welcome any positive agreement reached between China and the United States.

Oh boy, if Lee Jae-myung said that, Xi would definitely feel comfortable hearing it, right? But these words were said by Putin, and moreover by a Putin who has just redirected the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline to the Lake Baikal pipeline. When you hear that, don't you feel a chill down your spine—asking what other very important joint development projects still exist between China and Russia? Huh? Oh, this matter gets very interesting. After reading this, I went and summarized the joint development projects between Russia and China that could be called very important, aside from the ones we are all too familiar with, like the Beidou navigation channel issues, right? Developing the Arctic and so on, or those pipelines. Those pipelines actually can no longer be called ongoing joint development; those are the kinds of projects Putin doesn't even want to mention anymore—the ones he is keeping a tally of in his heart, waiting to turn around and demand payback with interest. Are you talking about the ultimate railway-free line that Xi went to sign at the BRICS summit? The one signed at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation? Clearly not either. Are you talking about BRICS pushing some new currency to replace the US dollar? Not that either, because Russia wants to use rubles, China wants to use digital RMB or RMB, and at its root, there has never been any genuine cooperation on this.

Yet there is something we don't usually talk about often, and I think that's what he was referring to. What is it? The Russia-China lunar development program. Look at this, on the very same day, the chief engineer and international project coordinator at the Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a guy named Rubins, stated in a statement released to the Russian media that more countries might join the lunar scientific research base project jointly built by China and Russia in the future. What he said was that currently, the construction of a joint data center for lunar and deep space research is being promoted. The center mainly consists of two parts: a Russian part and a Chinese part, while also retaining the possibility for other countries to participate. Then, the Roscosmos State Corporation and the China National Space Administration launched the International Lunar Research Station plan in 2021. The actual construction of this project will begin in 2031, and so far, it is said that another 11 countries have joined the project. Those 11 countries include things like Belarus, and so far, it seems there should already be a total of 17 countries, including Serbia, Venezuela, Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Egypt, South Africa. Just listening to these countries—they are all places Xi can still visit today, or places that have already undergone regime changes. Alright, this matter happens to line up with what Putin said.

Alright, what kind of project is this? Since he mentioned that actual construction begins in 2031, we all probably don't have much of a concept about it. Then I went to see what kind of progress is actually happening inside it. Once you look, it gets interesting. You know they said in 2021 that both sides would launch it, right? So what stage is it in now? It belongs to the so-called second preparation stage before the official actual construction of the project, which is the phase from 2026 to 2030. The first stage was called survey and feasibility study, and that phase was substantive preparation. Well, then it gets interesting, starting this year. Let's first look at what Russia is doing on its end. There are reports from the Russian side that on April 1 of this year, the Russian Academy of Sciences officially approved the conceptual design for the creation of the Russian branch of the International Lunar Research Station—which is one of the two main parts. The Russian side stated clearly that Russia has not shaken the core of the Sino-Russian lunar strategic cooperation. The approval of this concept means that Russia has already paved the way for you in terms of money, law, and scientific research technology.

Well, the question is, why did he emphasize that his confidence wasn't shaken? Because there is an interesting thing about Russia that everyone might have overlooked. When this lunar program started preparing for exploration and feasibility studies in 2021, a failure in Russia's lunar exploration occurred in 2023. In 2023, Russia had this thing called the Luna 25 unmanned probe. The timing of this unmanned probe was quite coincidental; the time it ran into trouble was right around the same days as the CCP's 093417 incident—that is, August 22nd and 23rd. Russia's launch was on August 11th. After it was launched, it crashed. It lost control while the unmanned probe was preparing to enter the landing orbit and eventually slammed into the lunar surface, crashing directly. Actually, Luna 25 was the first lunar exploration mission launched in 47 years since the Soviet Union launched the Luna 24 lunar probe in 1976. As everyone knows, Russia has never sent humans to the moon; everything sent up has been unmanned. Currently, only the United States has sent humans to the moon. So, the Soviet Union hadn't launched an unmanned probe for 47 years, and then in 2023, they tried to pull off something big, only for it to lose control in the landing orbit and crash instantly.

At the time, Russian experts specifically analyzed why it crashed, and the CCP's Reference News also translated and reprinted this, which shows that the CCP also cares a lot about this matter. Because you know, the CCP thinks, 'I'm with you, Russia, I'm relying on you,' while Russia thinks, 'I'm with you, CCP, and I'm also feeding off you,' right? It feels like two parties engaging in mutual exploitation. So the CCP cares deeply about why their 'Russian Dad's' Luna 25 crashed upon arrival, right? The core reason officially released by Russia at the time was that, for one, the engine ran overtime, leading to abnormal data; another reason was that the sensors went on strike, causing data flow interruptions, the accelerator failing to start, and the control system eventually failing to receive commands, leading to blind operation and final destruction. In reality, it's because throughout the 40-plus years from the Cold War to its end, despite the CCP later providing support—you think about the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022 and Russia launching this in 2023—it's clear that there were parts and technology stolen from the CCP involved. But the deeper reason is that you're just not up to it; it's like an athlete who still wants to run after breaking their leg, only to find they have to withdraw as soon as they hit the track. That's the feeling.

But regardless, even though Russia is embarrassed to admit that its technology has suffered a generational gap and can't keep up, at least they dare to admit the sensor issues, right? The engine issues. Unlike the CCP, which doesn't admit to the 093417 incident and then, when the T59 modification explodes, insists it's the other party's ammunition problem. So we say, well, Russia is in a state of 'not good enough compared to the best, but better than the worst,' while the CCP is purely shameless, right? As for you saying, look, from 2023 to now, Russia actually only has this funding left to create design concepts. So what has the CCP's lunar exploration project done in these few years? Well, the CCP claims that Chang'e 1, 2, and so on, all the way to 6, were successful in lunar landings. Especially after Xi took office, starting in 2013, right? They ran Chang'e 3, and then they were the first in human history to reach the far side of the moon, and even brought back samples. We don't know if it's true or not, right? Anyway, all we see are PPTs and those photoshopped data and photoshopped videos. But even if you really were the first in human history to sample the far side of the moon, well, these were all before 2024. That is to say, the CCP's last so-called unmanned probe arrived on the moon in 2024.

Now it's 2026, and the China-Russia cooperation has moved to the second phase. Hey, in 2026, Russia has no new motivation to launch, but the CCP's motivation is huge. Isn't that what we talked about before regarding the Chang'e 7 modification? The rocket exploded in front of everyone's eyes. Afterward, because the Chang'e 7 modification and the Chang'e 7 share some engines—the same engines—the Chang'e 7 lunar probe, which was originally scheduled to launch on August 19th and August 24th, was immediately announced to be postponed. Do you see? Of course, what the CCP gave later was, 'Oh, according to an ASEAN Headline report on August 24th, the Chinese Chang'e 7 lunar probe, originally planned to launch as early as August 24th, was delayed because it did not meet launch conditions.' The China Manned Space Engineering website released news on August 23rd stating that, in line with the principle of being steady, reliable, and foolproof, after comprehensive assessment, the Chang'e 7 mission did not meet launch conditions and could not be launched within this year's scheduled window. Previously, on August 19th, the China Manned Space Engineering website released news that on August 19, 2026, the Chang'e 7 probe and the Long March 5-14 carrier rocket in China...