Heavy Fines for Chinese Influencers! Deported to the Mainland and Having a Breakdown, Coming to Taiwan for Gay Surrogacy? Chinese Tourists Sing Red Songs and Cause a Scene at Tainan Station, High School Students Boldly Confront Them, Crowd Cheers for Taiwan's Victory

This video discusses three controversial incidents involving Chinese nationals in Taiwan. First, a netizen reported Sister Chen, who claimed to be from Singapore and Malaysia, for making a video shouting that Taiwan belongs to the People's Republic of China, and the host called for her deportation in accordance with the law; second, at Tainan Station, an individual suspected of self-identifying as a Chinese national livestreamed themselves singing the anthem of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and was immediately rebuked on the spot by a Taiwanese high school student shouting "Long live the Republic of China!"; lastly, a gay male influencer couple from China who settled in Malaysia came to Taiwan under the guise of tourism to promote surrogacy matters, and were subsequently swiftly penalized and repatriated by the National Immigration Agency. In addition, the video extends to discuss the high social security pressure in China, the comparison between same-sex marriage and surrogacy issues, and the trends of the upcoming CCP plenary session.

Video Link:

Full Text:

Today, there were three incidents involving Chinese Little Pinks causing trouble in Taiwan, and one of them has already been deported. Let's start with the smallest incident. A Little Pink with the account name 'Xin Ma Chen Jie' (Sister Chen from Singapore/Malaysia) came to Taiwan, likely in Kaohsiung or Tainan, and filmed a video shouting, 'A formal warning to Governor Lai Ching-te: Taiwan belongs to the People's Republic of China,' while displaying images of the five-star flag. Why does she think Taiwan belongs to the PRC? Let's take a look at this video. 'I am standing here now to tell Governor Lai Ching-te, what kind of independence are you talking about? This is Chongqing Street, and on the right is CTBC Bank. What independence? Taiwan Province belongs to the People's Republic of China.' Her logic is that because Taiwan has a Chongqing Street, Taiwan belongs to the PRC. 'What independence, Governor Lai Ching-te?' Following your logic, Chongqing should belong to the Republic of China. Our country is still called the Republic of China; we haven't declared independence—you are the ones causing division, aren't you? By your logic, let's take it a step further: does Canada have a London Street? Does the U.S. have British place names? Yes, so are they all British territory? Are they all part of the UK? Why do you always use arguments from 200 years ago? If that's the case, you might as well be a subject of the Qing Dynasty, because Chongqing also belonged to the Qing. But the problem is, the Qing Dynasty is gone, while the Republic of China still exists. Is there any government agency on that territory flying the Qing flag or paying civil servant salaries in the name of the Qing? No, but the Republic of China does. This woman doesn't look like she's here for tourism; she's just playing around. Taipei has Roosevelt Road, so does that mean Taiwan is governed by the U.S.? We see Nanjing East Road, so should the Party Secretary and Governor of Jiangsu Province come over to collect protection money? Do you know that your homestead land is about to be taxed? Taiwan also has many Japanese place names, so what should we do about that? Within the borders of China, there are places like Shandong, Dezhou, Binzhou, and even Long Island. Should they return to New York or Texas? Everyone gets a U.S. passport, and you hold a referendum. I tell you, out of 1.4 billion people in China, I bet more than two-thirds would want that. I would like to ask our relevant government agencies: has this 'Sister Chen' been deported yet? If not, everyone should hurry up and write letters to report her, or perhaps she has already left Taiwan? Regardless of whether she has left, if more of us write letters to report her, we can ensure she is banned from entering Taiwan for at least five years. Of course, we cannot be certain if this so-called 'Xin Ma Chen Jie' is truly a Chinese national from Singapore or Malaysia, or if she just resides there while holding a PRC passport. Or, a third possibility: she might be a former Chinese citizen who has been naturalized and holds a passport from Singapore or Malaysia, having renounced her PRC passport. If that's the case, it's even more ironic. You don't even want to be a citizen of the People's Republic of China yourself, yet you want Taiwan to abandon the Republic of China and become part of the PRC? Question mark. Anyway, regardless, by filming this video, she has violated the purpose of her entry permit, right? Moreover, she is slandering and seeking to destroy our national sovereignty, so she must be restricted or forcibly deported. Because I am not a legislator or a member of a relevant political party, I do not have the power of an elected representative to demand supervision or investigate how government departments are handling this. Furthermore, law enforcement efficiency is very slow, and I cannot supervise them because I am not an elected representative. Take last month as an example; everyone remembers that I publicly reported at least 3-4 people holding Chinese ID cards in Taiwan, right? One of them was even the wife of a former Taiwanese 'fake charity' figure, and some of them acted as intermediaries. As a result, I personally went to the National Immigration Agency of the Ministry of the Interior in Taipei to report them. A month later—exactly one month, I counted the time—I received a letter, an official document, saying, 'We are aware of the matter you reported. If they are found to be illegally holding a PRC residence permit, ID card, or passport, we will revoke their Taiwanese household registration.' But the final outcome cannot be disclosed because it involves sensitive personal information. However, as a civic group, what we citizens want is for these people—just like in criminal cases or other major incidents—to be identified as 'Chen XX, Wang XX,' and to be told that they have been officially deported and on what date they left. You provide such information for criminal cases, so may I ask, are national security cases not as important as criminal cases?

You could also say that, according to the final investigation results from our relevant National Immigration Agency units, Lin XX indeed held a passport of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and on a certain day in early October or November, under the deportation of the National Immigration Agency, was deported from Taoyuan Airport, with photos provided to the news media. Wasn't there a good example yesterday? Because they were monitored by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators and quickly deported, the Chinese gay male influencers who came to Taiwan to promote surrogacy—the two of them were also exposed by name, and the National Immigration Agency themselves provided photos of their repatriation at the airport. Then let me ask, why is it that for the materials I provided with conclusive evidence, where they also obtained ID cards, self-confession videos, and relevant ID photos, a month has passed, and not only has there been no explanation given to major media outlets and the citizens of the country as to whether they have been deported in comparison to the aforementioned two foreign Chinese-nationality influencers? Because they are already foreigners, right? They hold CCP ID cards. What we want is a result, even if it is a limited announcement, rather than asking you to explain to us once again a legal requirement we already know, which is that personal data cannot be made public—everyone can understand that. At least announce that the case is concluded, they have been deported, their household registration has been canceled, and they have been told to fuck off. Is it just because I am a self-media creator, an influencer who many people might perceive as lacking professional academic qualifications? Perhaps if you were to discuss China's economic issues and Politburo analysis with me one-on-one, you wouldn't even be as professional as I am. Or is it simply because you specifically only watch the videos where I scold people and report people? Do you watch my usual analyses of China's economy, China's economic and trade, China's exports, China's unemployment rate, US-China relations, social security issues, and the risks of political turmoil? You probably don't watch them, because you have no interest in them either. So I'll leave it at that.

Next, the second gratifying thing: the new Tainan Station recently opened, right? Many citizens are very happy about it. Inside, there is a piano available for the public to play, just like in many stations in Europe. A few days ago, a high school student in Tainan was playing the piano when a man with PRC nationality—or perhaps a pro-CCP Taiwanese, it's unclear, but in any case, someone who identifies as a person from the People's Republic of China—started a livestream and sang the national anthem of the PRC. "Arise, arise, those who refuse to be slaves," right? Well, a social security payment is enough to keep you in check. Your Ministry of Human Resources—no, correction—didn't your official brag a few days ago that "I will use big data to find you"? That very official was promoted by Xi Jinping yesterday. And "arise, arise"? You don't even dare to protest against this, yet you talk about "arising"? Learn from the French. Let me show everyone this fascinating scene. I have specially processed the audio, removing the piano music he was playing, just so everyone can hear clearly what this pro-CCP man said. "Wow, idol, idol! Wow, fellow Beijingers, I'm livestreaming this handsome guy for you live. Come, come, wait, cleaning up, I'll help you collect money. March on, march on, march on! Brothers, you all know I am the first person to sing the Chinese national anthem at Tainan Station. I'm afraid of being beaten to death by the 'Blue Birds' (pro-Taiwan independence supporters), so I'd better run." Then the reversal happened. This Taiwanese high school student shouted, "Long live the Republic of China! Long live Taiwan!" And this CCP Little Pink shouted, "Stop talking, I'm scared! Everyone, clap! Yeah, good! Long live Taiwan! Long live the Republic of China! Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes." Okay, so our political views are different, that's fine. So you actually think this is just a difference in political views? Then why, because of a difference in political views, did you launch a civil war, establish a Soviet, kill these Nationalist soldiers, carry out the Siege of Changchun, and force the retreat from Dachen Island? Why can't you continue to livestream on your Douyin and discuss this "difference in views" you claim to have? You don't even dare to do that. What are you afraid of? Coming to Taiwan, you don't need to circumvent the Great Firewall; it's so refreshing. What a coward. Why is he afraid? Because if the livestream detects the voice, or if he is reported by the Little Pinks watching his stream, he will be taken down, or worse, permanently banned. Because words like "Taiwan" and "Long live the Republic of China," right? Otherwise, Little Pinks, it's very simple: you can go test it out to see if I'm lying. Find a big-time streamer, one with tens of thousands of viewers, and after connecting, just shout, "Long live the Republic of China! Long live Taiwan! Freedom of speech! We just have different political stances!" Just try it and see if you get kicked by the streamer, and if the streamer gets cut off afterward. Seeing our younger generation have such countermeasures makes me feel relieved. It would be best if, in the future, when encountering such situations, you could talk back even more. "Do you know Guan Chang (Holger Chen)?" Right? "I also admire Guan Chang very much, you probably do too, right? Pro-CCP people usually admire him quite a bit, don't they?" And after he says he admires him, you should say, "I've seen this clip where Guan Chang says he wants to kill Xi Jinping, and he also said he wants to forcibly marry Peng Liyuan, and tell her to come over and let him spank her." It would be best if you could play it on the spot, so his livestream gets permanently banned. That would be the right way to do it. How dare he commit such disgraceful acts against our Holy Emperor and his honorable wife. Also, the National Immigration Agency should take a look: is this person a Taiwanese or a PRC national? If he is a PRC national, has he been deported? Has he been repatriated?

And one last thing, which I briefly touched upon earlier: there is a gay male couple of Chinese nationality. Rumor has it that one is a so-called Hong Kong resident and the other holds Australian household registration, though no one knows for sure and opinions vary, or perhaps they were just holding their usual Chinese "liver-red" passports—of course, that is not the point. So, why were they swiftly deported by the National Immigration Agency? A few days ago, they traveled to many cities in Taiwan under the guise of tourism, but actually held briefing sessions and meet-and-greets promoting surrogacy-related matters, claiming they wanted to help more people like them have their own bloodline descendants, and things of that nature. This is quite controversial, and we will not elaborate on it here, as it would blur the focus of our channel's discussion on state security issues. However, according to our country's existing laws, they violated the Artificial Reproduction Act, the Medical Care Act, and regulations regarding impure entry purposes, and so on. Therefore, after legislators from the Democratic Progressive Party received reports from citizens, they swiftly tracked down these two individuals, and the National Immigration Agency even provided photos of their deportation. Before deporting these two influencers, our government fined them around 200,000 New Taiwan Dollars. According to netizen reports, these two individuals have long resided in Malaysia, and the child they currently have seems to have also been born through surrogacy. They even established a company in the United States and have a physical operational base in Shenzhen, China. In other words, Chinese customers might go through this Shenzhen location, and then they would figure out a way to get you to the United States to go through such a process. What do they mainly promote? They claim to do overseas IVF, egg donation, surrogacy, and so on for the global LGBTQ+ community. Should surrogacy be opened up if you want to start a family? Of course, Taiwan can discuss it. What's more, the problem is you entered under the guise of sightseeing, so it serves you right. They even boast about helping people fulfill their dreams, and talk about various matching packages costing millions of New Taiwan Dollars. We won't go into detail here in order not to let our main discussion point be blurred by other issues. Where does my main logical argument lie? First of all, your own motherland does not even allow same-sex marriage, nor does it have any legal qualifications for it. Secondly, you don't even dare to fight for your rights in your own motherland, the People's Republic of China, yet you run over to our Republic of China, you run over to Taiwan, saying you want to help us Taiwanese fight for what you perceive as further rights. I made a comparison: it is as if a North Korean or an Iranian ran to South Korea and the United States and said, "I want to advance what I consider to be various developments in the US or South Korea because you are too backward, and I want to fight for human rights for Americans, regardless of the means or controversy." Well, why don't you go back to Iran and North Korea to fight for it? Fix your own motherland first, won't you? Make it so that you can legally have the right to marry according to your own beliefs, get that passed first, and then come here to criticize Taiwan.

France has been in a major uproar recently. Of course, it was initially about the allocation of public education resources, which is a complex issue with deep-seated structural problems buried 40 years ago. The debt-fueled money-making machine has stalled, yet the promised pensions cannot be reduced. Since they cannot be reduced, the only option is to cut funding from those without voting power—students and teachers, groups with less influence—to subsidize the excessively high pensions promised earlier. However, since the economy has stalled, in some respects, it is slightly similar to some of China's current problems, though not entirely. Of course, many different groups later joined in under different banners and agendas, and there was even looting and rioting, but the initial focus of the protests was to fight for their own rights, regardless of whether it was a structural issue. Now, looking at China, there is the mandatory payment of excessively high social security, and after November 1st, people face severe fines of 1 to 3 times the amount, along with a mess of exit-entry reviews and various other policies. The Chinese 'five insurances and one fund' or 'six insurances and one fund'—social security is supposed to be a safety net that catches you when you fall, helping you temporarily get through difficult times. Yet, for many flexible workers with unstable incomes who can barely pay their rent or loans, the very clever CCP Central Committee has introduced 'social security loans.' Some people are skipping meals, living on instant noodles or cheap snacks, and then you tell them that to ensure they can retire smoothly at 65, they must hurry up and pay back or pay high social security premiums. The problem is they are starving now; do you expect them to wait until they are 65 to be fed? Next Monday, Xi Jinping is preparing for the fifth plenary session, the prelude to his fourth term. Even at your National People's Congress held around March every year, you are unwilling to discuss whether same-sex marriage can exist—that topic doesn't even come up—or whether there is any way to discuss the issue of legalizing surrogacy, which you deem feasible or not. We in Taiwan discuss these things; our current consensus is against it, but we don't say it cannot be discussed. You, however, cannot even discuss it, yet you can somehow build a company in Shenzhen—though the actual execution is in the US—and claim you want to help us Taiwanese. Some netizens have asked why they can build a company in Shenzhen and why they can showcase values that the CCP does not approve of on social media platforms. Some say I'll just leave it at that; surely Chinese netizens will show their reports, but those reports have gone unanswered. If their Shenzhen company is not thoroughly investigated or their accounts are not deleted by the end of this year, or even before the 21st Party Congress, it means their backers are part of the Xi faction or related cliques. Of course, what everyone is most concerned about now is why Hu Chunhua suddenly disappeared. Didn't a warning sign appear at the CCP's Long March commemoration meeting a few days ago? We will discuss this topic in detail tomorrow. What clues can we see from the fifth plenary session, the prelude to the 21st Party Congress that will decide whether Xi Jinping will be re-elected? That's all for today's video. If you like it, remember to subscribe; if you don't, make sure to block me. I am Bajiong, see you next time, bye. Wow, this guy is amazing, brothers.