[Lude Press] 9/23/2026 [ludepress.com]

The program revolves around Xi Jinping's arrival in the United States and his reception by Trump, focusing on the arrangement of two B-1 bombers flying over the ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base during the playing of the US national anthem. It also covers the reactions of US bipartisan lawmakers to the CCP's support for Iran, Taiwan's security, and the high-profile reception for Xi. The program further discusses Rubio's official appointment as National Security Advisor, He Lifeng's talks with Yellen on US-China economic relations, and the constraints on US arms sales to Taiwan due to its own defense industrial capacity.

Video Link:

Full Text:

Hello everyone, and welcome to today's program, "Dr. Yan Speaks" on Ludepress.com, September 23, 2026. We are bringing you the first-hand report on Xi's arrival in the United States and the events surrounding his state visit. Watching our program today, you will truly get the very first look at the clearest depiction of Xi's performance at the airport.

Our title says Xi was shocked, truly shocked. It means that Baby Xi was frightened. I watched the live stream of his reception at the airport repeatedly, about forty to fifty minutes before our program started. I even took screenshots specifically for you. I'll show them later in case you can't see clearly. Trump is indeed ruthless! Didn't we say before? He was supposed to just receive him at Andrews Air Force Base today. Then tomorrow, the White House will have a military parade, with B-2 bombers flying in formation, followed by talks in the evening and a state banquet. The day after tomorrow, he goes to the archives, and then he won't be escorted out; you'll depart from there to the airport yourself. No one expected that today, during the reception, two B-1s would suddenly appear in formation, and this happened while the US national anthem was being played.

Xi's expression was completely stunned, like a wooden chicken or a wooden pig, with a deathly pale face. People online are always saying that because Xi gave Trump a high-level reception last time, Trump would now host Xi with the highest level of protocol. Including, let me tell you, both parties are talking about it, and lawmakers are questioning why Xi is being given such a high-profile reception.

I told you, President Trump knows how to play the game. Let's look at it step by step. Only by understanding the preceding events can we truly grasp how shocking this was, to the point of being speechless and bursting into laughter, right? First of all, let's talk about Xi coming to the US with this decision, there's no turning back. The propaganda will immediately shift to make it seem like Trump was begging him to come, and that his visit was a favor to Trump. Let's say those eunuchs are useless at anything else, but they are quite skilled at flattery.

First, let me greet our audience friends. We can't forget our audience friends. This audience friend's name is T W Tian Ce. The following characters are in Japanese, which we haven't studied. Is this friend from Taiwan? He says, "He often gives others a show of force, and this time he was shown a show of force." No, he's writing in simplified Chinese, so this friend likely has a mainland background. Alright, hello to you. Let's watch, don't rush, let's take it step by step.

Just as Xi was about to board the plane, Xie Feng, the top eunuch in the US, the top consul general in the US, the top ambassador to the US, right? The top eunuch in the US, Xie Feng, began publishing an article in the People's Daily. This article, of course, didn't directly mention red lines or anything like that, but rather talked about promoting the implementation of a constructive strategic stable relationship between China and the US.

First of all, as soon as this article came out, all the international media immediately understood the implications. Of course, the international media also includes Xi's overseas propaganda outlets, so they all started collectively reposting, saying that Xi is coming to the US and will present four red lines to Trump.

Someone summarized the four red lines? They are: you cannot tell me what to do about the Taiwan issue, Taiwan is internal affairs of China; you cannot bring up human rights, Xinjiang, democracy, we have our own Chinese-style human rights. When you say Xinjiang genocide, I don’t accept it, everyone knows that.

What are the other two? One is that now AI has made the CCP see danger, the political system cannot be changed. Since AI appeared, the Ministry of Public Security has started writing articles, Chen Wenqing and the State Security Ministry have to write, saying the only risk of AI is that it might cause problems for the regime, and we must guard against it. So the issue of the regime is what this means: you America cannot talk to me about "Open up China" and then dismantle the CCP.

And there is another thing you can’t mention? I can’t recall at the moment. I remember someone online said, yes, there is also the so‑called benefit of China’s development, how to develop? You grab the opening, the Belt and Road everywhere, and that is called your development benefit, right?

So basically nothing can be mentioned. But look, after writing so many things you can’t mention, did he write a comprehensive list? He didn’t say you can’t mention nuclear issues, nor the origin of COVID‑19, nor biological weapons, nor whether the CCP should be turned into something like Venezuela or Iran overnight. He only said you cannot mention our political system. The United States says we won’t mention it, we can start with precise strikes, such as targeted decapitation, targeted arrests, etc.

Look, Xie Feng wrote a long piece, yet he missed many key points. Do we understand now? This shows that there is nothing left to discuss between the US and China! Because what the US wants to talk about, the CCP dares not touch; what the CCP wants to talk about, the US doesn’t listen, you just bluff.

So it says there are four red lines, but in fact there are red lines everywhere, all of them are red lines. If you say okay, we won’t mention those, then we can bring up the electric fraud guys, your princely group, your crypto, the blows you receive in this economic zone, all cannot be mentioned.

The funniest part is, I see Xie Feng’s “foot‑binding cloth” actually mainly says US‑China cannot decouple and cut supply chains. He quotes that if US‑China decouples, nobody can stand it. I’ll check the long piece to find that sentence. In the second paragraph he says that over the past 11 years US‑China relations have weathered storms, fully proving that decoupling is impossible, that a high‑hand approach doesn’t work, confrontation cannot be pursued, and that the so‑called “century‑changing situation” is accelerating, with international conditions intertwining and shifting.

After all that, do you get it? It starts from the core of the Xi‑CCP regime, where people are already anxious. If ordinary citizens learned that the CCP is about to be opened up or dismantled, who wouldn’t be anxious? We won’t talk about other things; the younger generation at home is already lying flat, waiting for the day when, lying down, a new world arrives, right?

So here you see the mandatory line: don’t beat me up! If you want to hit me, hey, you Tyson, I know you’re itching for a fight, I also know I’ve provoked you. But Tyson, if you cut off the relationship between me, Ma Baoguo and you, you can’t handle it! Tyson jokes, I just think Ma Baoguo jumps around because he’s afraid I’ll slap him and send him flying. You keep playing that game with me, right?

An audience member asks, in New Zealand, US‑China decoupling, can you stand it? Can anyone? How can you not? We’re not the vested interests; on the contrary, several generations of us have been turned into something by the “hoho”.

So Xie Feng’s jumping around here is essentially the same as the domestic stability‑maintenance stuff, then packaged for export, a pre‑summit People’s Daily version, just the same medicine in a different bottle, which is laughable.

You see, the US side has so many things to talk about and do every day, even you’re dazzled, you can’t keep up with the programs. But over in the CCP’s land, doesn’t it feel dead‑ended, a stagnant pool? It’s the same old rhetoric over and over. Even if you try to solve problems, nothing gets solved. It’s like a stubborn force, two hundred jin of wheat on a ten‑mile mountain road that won’t shift shoulders, always charging toward the direction that sprays excrement on the face, and we just accept it, right?

Besides that, the CCP also brought out a very important propaganda figure, Elon Musk. Look, Xi is about to arrive, and Musk also pops up on CCTV, praising Xi as a great leader, saying he must go to China to see it. Musk’s whole family, parents and all, are in the country, and there’s a Yang Yang here communicating locally with Musk, which is different.

Musk said a lot, and Pengpai.com, various sites keep pulling Musk’s statements out as if they were golden rules. They say Xi is a great leader, Shanghai’s Tesla factory has outstanding talent, and this isn’t even CCTV, it’s a joint interview by People’s Daily and CCTV.

It also gives Xi a bit of confidence when he visits abroad. Musk is also good at bragging, saying China has achieved remarkable development under Xi, new buildings and infrastructure reflect these changes, and you can clearly feel the ordinary Chinese people’s living standards have risen dramatically on the streets. He is very wise and far‑sighted.

He really knows how to talk. Let me ask, did Musk know the living standards of the Chinese people before Xi came to power? Or does he truly understand the current living conditions of ordinary people? Why does he understand CCP China so well? Why not listen to how "middle-class people falling back into poverty" has become what it is in CCP China now? This shouldn't be called a trending search, it's also a word of the year.

How did such a capable, visionary, and wise person lead China's birth rate to a level lower than even the Great Famine of the 1950s or the Qing Dynasty? How did he lead all Chinese people to middle-class poverty? Every day, so many people are lamenting, can they still afford their mortgages, can they still afford their children's tuition, do they still have jobs to continue? What about social security, medical insurance, right?

Not to mention that after civil servants couldn't get paid, there are often those fat sheep, whether across provinces or locally, who are directly taken in and start to be slaughtered. The money is squeezed out and goes into the pockets of local government departments as financial income. Wasn't it reported recently? The deputy director of the Public Security Bureau in Hunan extorted 100 million from an entrepreneur. It was a wrongful conviction. But at least over 60 million has been confiscated and entered their government system as financial income.

These two people will at most be dismissed, and that unlucky entrepreneur is still in prison. With this kind of thing, you tell me, this is what Musk said, he is very wise and visionary.

He also recommended that people should at least visit Beijing and Shanghai, saying that taking the high-speed train from Beijing to Xi'an, you should look out the window more and not stare at your phone. I don't know if we knew this when he was in CCP China. Doesn't Musk use all sorts of things? He himself doesn't admit it's drug use, but in CCP China, it would be considered overdose and drug abuse. The drugs he uses, if you take the high-speed train from Beijing to Xi'an, let alone the treatment you receive along the way, it's simply incredible, it's beyond super-national treatment, it's comparable to the treatment Empress Dowager Cixi received when she fled Beijing.

Surrounded by women and flatterers, and then told to look out the window more and not stare at the phone. I don't know if you could have this energy without taking those drugs. He doesn't admit it himself, but how much has been reported in the US? It's said to boost his energy, but it's actually drug abuse. But CCP China wants to praise him, so he has to speak up at such times.

Moreover, Musk believes that the US-China trade is like conjoined twins, sharing almost one body, and forcibly separating them would be extremely dangerous. He said that in reality, the US and China are interdependent, so they must not be separated. What a joke! Trump said that communism is the greatest and unprecedented existential threat to the United States since its founding. Now, in Musk's mouth, it has become conjoined twins, and they almost share one body. What you mean is that the United States is already terminally ill, deeply ill, full of cancer cells, and beyond saving, is that what you mean?

Well, if they are truly conjoined twins, and one is severely robbing the other of nutrients, but they share one body, and cannot be separated, medicine has long had the ability to do so, which is to remove one and leave only one choice, understand? If the Xi regime is like this, and truly becomes conjoined twins with the US, and is still robbing nutrients, then it will definitely be precisely cut off.

So, why is it said that Xi's visit this time is not a good omen? The delegation of entrepreneurs also said they would come but didn't, and I don't know if they are afraid of being detained after arriving, or afraid of defecting, right? Or afraid that they would all turn into people like Archi in private. Now they are talking about conjoined twins, you shouldn't say such things, say less, right?

Then let's look at it. Lu De She said this morning that many people in the US, including the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, have publicly warned, and many senators have publicly stated that you, Xi Jinping and Trump, cannot treat him with such high regard. For example, Roger Wicker of the Armed Services Committee said that Xi Jinping is a dictator who rules through brutal oppression, and his military power directly targets and threatens the United States. It must be remembered, and he specifically emphasized that this is an unelected dictator.

Let's talk about why Maduro was caught at MDC now. Didn't the US say? Don't think you have immunity as a head of state. You were not fairly elected. Venezuela's last so-called election was unfair, and the US did not recognize it at the time. You, Maduro, have been in power for a few more years, and now the US is coming to arrest you, and the judicial authorities have already prepared these cases and unsealed the indictments in advance.

So arresting you is like playing a claw machine, it is completely in line with the law. Who told you not to be democratic? Your fake democracy is not democracy. Look, now the chairman of the Armed Services Committee and a senior senator directly say that Xi is also unelected, brutal, and directly targets the United States. With these points put together, you don't even need to listen to Lu De She's detailed interpretation this morning to feel it. This is simply making Xi's neck feel cold, right? Isn't this getting closer and closer to MDC?

The Democratic Party originally had such a good relationship with Xi, but don’t worry, it’s because they saw Trump greeting Xi between the two parties, so they had to take an opposite stance, or from other interest angles. In short, just watch, it’s very interesting. The heavyweight Democratic senators are not all like the CCP thinks, jumping to the BBC, VOA, New York Times to clap and praise when Xi comes. On the contrary, look at this.

Taiwan, Russia‑Iran issues, first the visit to Taiwan that should happen, the Graham‑Hughes Act that should be voted on, and then they start saying: Trump needs to suppress Xi on these issues! Including Senate Foreign Relations Committee Democratic leader Jeanne Shaheen, Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Democratic leader Chris Coons, people like Patty Murray, Senate Armed Services Committee Democratic leader Jack Reed, Senate Intelligence Committee Democratic leader Mark Warner, and even the special panel’s Elizabeth Warren. Warren, who is on par with Sanders, is very left on many issues. Also Senate leaders on national security, trade, finance Andy Kim, who together issued a statement. Listing these names is to show that they are indeed influential senators.

They jointly noted that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) provides satellite imagery technology and intelligence to Iran and terrorist proxies, and attacks and kills U.S. service members. We have set this up in our program before. During the U.S.–Iran cease‑fire, the CCP took advantage of the lull to give Iran’s remaining forces more satellite intelligence support, leading to an attack on a U.S. base in Jordan where three service members were killed, all counted against Xi’s regime. Don’t think that the mysterious explosion of the remote‑sensing satellite 502 solves anything; the accountability is far from over.

Then you see the Democrats also mention chips, AI and other areas where the CCP is engaging in various unfair competitions with the United States. They ask why President Trump disregarded security commitments and did not wisely protect these U.S. interests? They also bring up Taiwan, Ukraine and so on. They say Trump rolled out the red carpet for Xi, held a closed‑door dinner, and struck deals with billionaires that threatened U.S. jobs and national security. Xi enjoys the highest‑level hospitality while Canada and others endure trade wars. So they ask, can this be tolerated? That’s the subtext.

The two‑party struggle in the U.S. has always existed, so even if Trump does well, the Democrats will still see negatives. That is the fundamental reason the American system continues to develop, progress, and stay vibrant. But, as we always say, when two people fight, a third party gets beaten. It looks like both sides are dissatisfied with Trump, Trump is dissatisfied with the Democrats, but in the end the squeezed‑out interests are those of the Xi regime! And now even the Democrats are …

You see, the Democrats originally didn’t want to fight Iran, they wanted a quick cease‑fire! The CCP has been thrilled about this for months, thinking that the Iran issue alone has split the United States, right? Because Democrats keep saying Trump shouldn’t fight Iran. Did you notice? They say don’t fight Iran, the CCP has been fanning the flames for so long, and then—how to sanction? Direct sanctions? The Graham‑Hughes Act, which provides assistance to Iran and Russia, passed the House with a high vote, and the Senate is even more certain, completely baffling the CCP. Now I tell you, they are definitely still studying what deep impacts that bill will have on the CCP, and then they’ll see.

Originally this side of the Democrats seemed to be attacking President Trump for fighting Iran, but now suddenly Xi shows up, and the Democrats say: How can Trump welcome Xi like that? Our troops died during the Iran cease‑fire, and after the second strike, that assistance came from the CCP, the CCP helped Iran strike U.S. forces. If you don’t call it out properly, we will not relent. Do you understand? In the article Xie Feng just mentioned, he didn’t even bring this up, right? So the red lines weren’t written, which makes it even more discussable. I say, Xie Feng wrote it, but he didn’t dare; if he didn’t write it, he left it there, which is like the U.S. saying, you didn’t mention it, so we’ll assume it’s not your red line, and we’ll push harder. We just say, Xi will have to spend that day in the United States, starting tomorrow meeting Trump, it’s absolutely impossible to be comfortable, just keep that in mind.

And why should anyone host a state dinner for him? Let your friends make those deals with him, which will threaten U.S. national security and jobs. What did Xie Feng just say? He said we can’t decouple and cut supply chains, you shouldn’t interfere with China’s development, we won’t decouple. And previously Xi even planned to bring a delegation of ten thousand entrepreneurs. Now look, once the Graham‑Hughes Act was introduced, I say this thing started auto‑involution.

The CCP still wants to claim some “unrestricted warfare,” telling the United States, “It’s not a party‑enterprise, it’s not civil‑military integration, it’s all private enterprise, we’re coming to invest, you can’t do without us.” Do you see how quickly the Democratic shift is happening? If ordinary people don’t watch our program, they can’t keep up with this speed.

And what's even funnier about this is, think about it, have you all ever seen a very interesting plot in "The Legend of Zhen Huan"? When An Lingrong was about to be enfeoffed as a concubine, the eunuchs went up to try and please her and gave the Emperor several nice titles to choose from. Originally, these titles were all quite pleasant, but Zhen Huan didn't want An Lingrong to have a good name, so after some instigation, the Emperor chose "li" (鹂), the character for oriole, for An Lingrong. The implication was that she was a bird person. Of course, it sounded like a good omen, something about many children and much happiness, but in reality, wasn't it equivalent to giving her a title like "Monkey Consort" or "Dog Consort"? So when An Lingrong saw she was given a title like "Bird Consort" or "Oriole Consort," she was furious.

At the same time, the head eunuch gathered the junior eunuchs and said, "Who among you gave An Lingrong those titles?" A few junior eunuchs, thinking they were about to be rewarded, said, "I, I, I, I chose them." The head eunuch then said, "None of you know who your master is, right? You showed favor to the wrong person, so drag them out and give them dozens of planks. From now on, understand clearly who the master is, and don't offer your services in the wrong place." An Lingrong was even more enraged upon hearing this, saying, "Why should those who are kind to me be beaten? Isn't this telling everyone in the palace that no one can be kind to me?"

Look at this anecdote. When I saw it before, I thought it was quite interesting and didn't think much of it. Today, seeing this, I suddenly connected it all. Think about it, isn't this exactly what's happening with Xi now? The entire political arena, both parties, the court and the public are all shouting that anyone who is good to Xi is a traitor to the United States, someone who cannot be elected in the upcoming midterm elections, and someone who will fail to protect American jobs and national security in the future, isn't that the feeling?

Of course, Trump is not a traitor, nor will he fail to protect American jobs and national security. But you get the gist of it, listen to this. Doesn't Xi have that feeling of An Lingrong crying and wailing, "Can't anyone in this palace be kind to me? Who else would dare to be kind to me?" Look at it now, especially when hosting a state banquet or giving special treatment in the United States, both parties are telling Trump: We are not comfortable with what you are doing.

So, think about it, if Xi visits other countries next, what will that feel like? When he went to Egypt before, Egypt still gave him some face, but India did not. If he goes on this trip again to personally lead the charge of the times, to personally conquer, which of the allied countries that are friendly with the United States, the allies who, as Trump said at the UN General Assembly yesterday, will stand with the United States to confront the common enemy of mankind, who can give Xi a good face or good treatment? Isn't this equivalent to the United States having already spoken? Yesterday, they said they would directly confront the common enemy of mankind, and everyone understands who that common enemy of mankind is. Today, you will see that even being kind to him is not allowed.

Only Trump can fully play out this drama and set the stage. Isn't the global trend now changing because of Xi's defense against the US? This is not something that the Chinese Communist Party can buy with just money through its propaganda. And even more ruthless is the news: the chairman of the House Select Committee on the CCP, Mike Gallagher, wrote a letter to President Trump last week, explicitly stating that the cooperation between the CCP and the Iranian military, which has led to American casualties, is tantamount to an act of war against the United States. Do you see? Just now we said the Democratic Party also mentioned this, and at the same time, Republican Congressman Gallagher also specifically wrote a letter about this matter.

Don't underestimate this matter! What does this mean? It means that both parties, whether Democratic or Republican, whether the Senate or the House of Representatives, beyond those issues, have now begun to make a final judgment that the CCP, along with Iran, has essentially acted as a belligerent party against the United States, causing American casualties.

Furthermore, you are a brutal dictator who has not been elected. Regarding this matter, let's set aside those red lines! Disregard the red lines drawn by the CCP. Just looking at this matter, who can tolerate it? If the United States doesn't retaliate directly next, is it still the United States? This is no longer a question of whether the United States will proactively declare war; it is now a matter of inaction if you, Trump, do nothing.

Such a significant event, when the remains of American soldiers were brought back, it was President Trump himself and his staff who personally went to the airport to receive them and pay their respects. Therefore, in this situation, both parties have escalated significantly. These past few days, I'm telling you, regarding Xi's visit to the United States, it's not what you think, what the BBC Chinese or the New York Times are reporting about public concerns. The public has already seen those things. To be honest, after so many years of CCP propaganda, with the same old tricks, who is willing to read those words anymore? People want to see something new, something explosive, something with conflict, something eye-catching.

Just think about it, at the last moment, as Xi was about to arrive and was already on the plane, suddenly, pop, pop, pop, like firecrackers, both parties came out to tell everyone: We don't care about the fight with Iran, but the CCP is a substantive belligerent party. Especially consider this, the fact that the CCP can cause American casualties is something that cannot be discussed.

The Graham Act is essentially a mandatory legal tool for these Americans, whether they are legislators or U.S. government agencies. This weapon tells you, “Aren’t you going to hold the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) accountable? We now have a weapon.” Because the Graham Act involves tariffs, asset freezes, seizures, and legal actions, you can actually go after people. In other words, to put it bluntly: you are all now bounty hunters, moving from top to bottom, because we now have this concrete legal weapon. Thanks to Mr. Graham! One has to wonder whether, because he pushed this bill, the CCP, after getting wind of it, came down hard on him. This bill is far more heavyweight than we imagined.

With this bill, you become a bounty hunter. Previously you might say you offer a bounty, but those bounty hunters might think: if something goes wrong, you won’t protect me; the enemy is so powerful, and if I take them down I could suffer losses with no basis for compensation. Various hesitations arise, especially since the country has been friendly with the CCP for decades, and now I step forward—what if I become cannon fodder?

Before, each side had its own plans, so the matter couldn’t be unified. Now that the Graham Act exists, this is truly different. It’s like a king saying, “I will attack that city, I will take that land, and after I capture it you will all help me, and I will reward you.” Some might worry the king could renege, or that he isn’t serious about fighting. But if the king issues a legal decree, publicly announces it, signs and seals it, will everyone join? They’ll rush to do so!

Thus the United States has moved from the ancient or pre‑modern European state of affairs to a modern civilization where these matters become laws, executive orders, and the like. Now that the Graham Act is out, people say you can’t have good relations with the CCP, and that claim holds because they can point to violations of the Graham Act: funding Iran one moment, funding Russia the next. As we discussed yesterday, why would Xi bring over Chinese banks, BYD, Alibaba, etc., when they clearly breach the act?

So you see, they say: if Trump brings billionaires to do business with him, that endangers U.S. national security and threatens American jobs. That claim is now valid. Both sides cooperate. Trump says, “I warmly welcome you,” while the Democratic Party, your so‑called friends, also chimes in.

Take the CCP’s propaganda and internet armies—they’re still scrambling. Look at the fake anti‑CCP groups along the Yellow River, with their leaders shouting things like “Biden is good, Trump is bad, Democrats are good, Republicans are bad,” urging people to vote in the midterms. Their online troops post in Chinese on major forums and social media, saying “Only for Trump’s China Virus narrative, we must not vote for them, we must vote Democratic.” Now the Democrats are saying those things.

Do you really want to vote for them now? After you vote, the Democrats sit there waiting for a pork‑barrel feast. You think that’s it? Moreover, this involves bipartisan cries, coming from legislators. In other words, they claim the CCP is essentially declaring war on the U.S. military. First, those lawmakers don’t speak lightly without legal basis; they won’t lose face. Second, do you really have 99% of the legal basis? The CCP is still scheming, and you lack the remaining 1%—you think you can exploit a loophole. The passage of the Graham Act tells you there will be no more gaps. You say Xi’s actions amount to a declaration of war on the U.S. military, causing casualties that must be retaliated against, right? If you think there’s still a loophole for your hybrid warfare, rest assured it will be closed within a few months. So this matter truly still has layers.

Speaking of which, let me show you what's even funnier. Remember Senator John Kennedy? That very humorous and sharp Republican senator. What did he say before? When Xi visited, during the last Trump-Xi meeting in May, remember what he said? He said Xi's anxiety about Taiwan is like a pregnant nun. We specifically explained that in our program at the time, it was hilarious. Seeing Xi coming this time, Senator Kennedy said on Fox again, "The people ruling Iran are reptiles, they belong to the same reptile group. China, North Korea, and Russia have united, and the number one reptile in this reptile group is Xi Jinping. These four countries are birds of a feather, like the same prostitute in different clothes. They lie like timeshare salespeople, you can't trust them at all!"

This timeshare salesperson analogy is an American idiom. For us Chinese, it's like those online scammers, right? Scammers. Wow, the things he said! Whether Xi is a prostitute in different clothes, a liar like a scammer, or a reptile, the number one reptile in this group is Xi Jinping. My goodness, if the time wasn't right, Senator Kennedy wouldn't dare to say such sharp words, right? He's a senator, not an idiot, can he just say anything? If he says it, it means he's leading the charge. Next, Xi being the number one reptile, a prostitute in different clothes, a lying salesperson, won't this become deeply ingrained in people's minds?

Seriously, let's just say, is the Xi regime cowardly? They say he's always pretending to be dead or something, right? See, they also use animals to describe them. And let's just say, America is hunting the Xi regime, along with Russia, Iran, and North Korea. Don't look at them all as reptiles, they at least want to live now, right? Including the remnants, like Pezeshkian, look at Pezeshkian today at the UN General Assembly, still giving anti-American speeches. News has come out that the US delegation and Iran have already talked for 3 hours, and the results are very good? What could they have talked about for 3 hours that was anti-American? If it was anti-American, the US would have wanted to throw you onto the firing range within 30 seconds, what else could you think? Right? Now, everyone else is here, trying to find ways to lure Xi into a trap. Whether he's the number one reptile or the main course for a pig-slaughter feast, isn't he about to be served?

If any of the 'wumao' (50 cent army) come here and start jumping around now, I'll really say you need to think hard when you go back. After listening to our program, you wumao keep making petty, insignificant comments, right? Would you dare to report what we just said truthfully when you go back? Would you truthfully summarize it for Xi? If you don't, what are you afraid of? Don't you think we're right? You dare not tell Xi, which means your heart is no longer firm. If you are loyal to Xi, absolutely loyal to Xi, you should dare to pass on our words. And our exact words are: You dogs, the number one heads, are leading the country astray, right? Brainwashing is already not working well, and with your ill intentions, reporting things in this way, Xi will eventually have to kill you dogs, the number one heads, right?

So, I'm talking about these wumao, and also the national security and intelligence agents. I don't know after listening to our program, have you actually started to converge in the same direction as we've said, or are you loyal to Xi but still have to report things in a way that seems to follow the trend? In that case, don't blame Xi when he strikes! Anyway, it's absolutely no problem for him to deal with you, right?

Okay, so let's say, look, what Kennedy said is really harsh, but President Trump still gave him a lot of face. Let me show you this. I estimate that if you look at the CCP's coverage, they will definitely crop a few pictures and show you the most beautiful side of Xi, right? But what we're showing you is different. Let me show you, what is this? Look, look at this picture. Trump went to greet Xi in advance, sitting in what was equivalent to his presidential car, right? The Beast arrived at Andrews. Look, this is Trump taking Marine One from the White House in advance to Andrews Air Force Base. After getting off the helicopter, he transferred to the presidential car, the Beast, and went to greet Xi. This was before Xi arrived, with the entire formation and preparations here.

So then, including showing you, before Xi arrived, there was an entire squadron of F‑22s lined up on this tarmac, right? This F‑22, the Americans themselves said: "Look, if you have the guts, steal it!" We’re just letting you see our stealth aircraft, far ahead of anything made by the Chinese state! And these aircraft were parked next to Xi’s special plane, just those F‑22s. Some big‑name American commentator even said, "Aren’t you just here to steal? After you steal, you’ll try to make some knock‑offs, let’s see if you can get these!" This is a U.S. government official aircraft, and next to it a squadron of F‑22s, and Xi’s plane actually landed and parked on the same tarmac. See, we’re showing you a fifth‑generation stealth fighter, no need to go to great lengths to steal it. Trump said, “We’ll put it right in front of you so you can see it, right? Let’s show you what true stealth is, what true supersonic is, what true beyond‑visual‑range air‑to‑air capability is, right?”

So it’s really fascinating! Let’s put it here. I originally said today was the Andrews Air Force Base reception, so the F‑22 thing isn’t anything special; it’s standard for a reception at an air base. But the point is, that short‑lived, actually only about ten to twenty minutes, reception, President Trump again came up with a novel way to play Xi! Let me find it for you. Here, let’s first look at this series of scenes of Xi’s plane landing that were streamed online. You see, we’ll show you a bit at a time, it’s very interesting.

When Xi’s plane stopped on the tarmac, you see the U.S. three‑service honor guard already there to welcome him, with live music and a red carpet. And today, when I watched this, I finally understood that laying out a red carpet isn’t that complicated; it just depends on whether the other side wants to give you one. So when Xi was with Trump, you see, last year—actually the year before, during the Biden administration, when Blinken and Yellen visited, they were always fiddling with the red carpet for them. I tell you, this is purely a deliberate stunt to make you feel you can’t react. That’s even less clever than Modi using his left hand to wipe his butt while shaking Xi’s hand.

Trump’s side doesn’t do that! This time, as you can see, the live stream actually showed the whole red‑carpet segment. In reality, Xi’s plane lands, then taxis on the runway. And over there, you see the ladder with the red carpet being pushed forward. You might not see it, but from the camera’s angle there’s a large red carpet right there. That large carpet is prepared for the next stretch of red carpet, so that when Trump stands on it to greet Xi, the transition is seamless, stepping onto a brand‑new red carpet. So, can you see it? I’m showing you the large carpet here—can you see the screenshot I’m sharing? Look at this carpet, it’s already been moved over, right? It’s not a patchwork of mismatched lengths or widths that would make you step on mud or rain‑soaked ground. It’s just one piece of red carpet, not that complicated. If they want to give you one, they can absolutely do it.

So you see, the U.S. side has the red carpet ready and the formation to welcome, right? After it’s set, the Chinese side’s officials watch. Look at Trump, then his “Beast” motorcade goes to greet Xi. During this, Trump is in one of the cars—this is Trump’s car. When they get there, he steps directly out of the Beast limousine with First Lady Melania. Look at the First Lady, really, Trump’s energy is impressive! Yesterday she was still in New York, right? With such a tight schedule, today nothing was delayed, and they came to greet Xi. The setup is generous, with the Chinese flag on one side and the U.S. flag on the other. I tell you, the treatment is extremely high‑level; no wonder Xi feels honored now. But the problem is, without cultural understanding, the substance is incomprehensible, right?

It was quite interesting. When Xi started to deplane, he was with Peng Liyuan. That's just talk, I don't really think Xi has any health problems. Because with Xi, when people say he walks, especially down stairs, he sometimes stumbles, you can understand that. That doesn't mean he recently had a stroke or cerebral hemorrhage. That's just smoke and mirrors from those fake anti-communists. As I said, Xi took that anti-tuberculosis shot, the childhood butt shot, which causes this gluteal muscle atrophy. If you just look it up, back in the 60s and 70s, it was common to get TB shots in the butt in China, and this is a very common sequela. Xi has certainly undergone a lot of rehabilitation since then, so at least now, even if he's not biologically his own, right? Only adoption can replace purchase, but walking is more or less the same. His slight stumble doesn't necessarily mean his brain is malfunctioning, right? If Xi's brain were truly malfunctioning, it would mainly be reflected in his IQ. We should be fair and not speak carelessly, right? At least him deplaning with Peng Liyuan, walking a bit slower, a bit wobbly, is nothing to criticize.

After deplaning, they presented flowers and did other things. The funniest part, I'll tell you, was after Xi deplaned, Trump greeted him and spoke with him. Xi's expression seemed to genuinely understand. Because of the angle, we couldn't see if Xi understood English or if he had his short translator next to him. Do you remember? Xi's short English translator, very short. With these tall US soldiers around, it's normal not to see him, right? But anyway, in this segment, Xi acted naturally, Peng Liyuan was also dignified, and then they walked forward. First, a military band played, then the leaders of the two countries stood in place for photos and the national anthems. First, the national anthem of Communist China was played, and there was nothing special about it, right? Well, Xi looked spirited, you can see clearly, Xi's expression seemed quite confident, right? Feeling like he was receiving state guest treatment.

Next, right after your national anthem, shouldn't the US national anthem be played? Right? When the US national anthem started playing, you see, President Trump and the First Lady immediately saluted, which indicates it's the US national anthem. It's fine that Xi and Peng Liyuan didn't salute, right? There's nothing to say about that. But the key issue arose during the one or two minutes of the US national anthem. Wow, Chairman Xi didn't expect it either, because you know, the entire welcoming ceremony was very short. Just deplaning as you saw, presenting flowers, exchanging pleasantries, then jointly listening to the national anthems, and then shaking hands. I'll show you later, Xi got into a special car and went in one direction, Trump got into another, returning to his own Beast limousine. It wasn't like Putin and Kim Jong Un, or Putin and Trump, riding in the same car. There are no arrangements for any interaction between the two sides tonight or tomorrow. Whether Xi wants to give a speech at the Chinese consulate in the US or meet with others, that's his business.

In other words, the entire timeline I'm showing you, right? Because at the final 35-minute mark, Trump's motorcade had already left. The entire ceremony, with Trump and Xi meeting, was ending in less than 3 minutes. About halfway through the US national anthem, suddenly a roar came from the sky, and Xi was a bit stunned! I'll show you the photos later, frame by frame. And during this process, Trump suddenly showed a smile, a very mischievous, very cunning smile. Then he looked at Xi. Xi's expression, we must remember Xi's expression when the Chinese national anthem was played, because you'll see the contrast later. I estimate that the CCP will cut this part, really. Xi's expression just froze! You can say it's quite like a cold-blooded reptile, expressionless. For example, crocodiles, snakes, geckos, lizards, right? They really have no expression and are cold-blooded. That feeling, Senator Kennedy was right. Then Trump looked at him, so proud, so satisfied. We said yesterday and the day before, the White House itinerary released did not mention welcoming Xi with B-1 bombers. You can check online yourself, nowhere does it mention the appearance of the B-1. But Trump, fearing the welcome wouldn't be adequate, directly had these bombers fly overhead with a roar. Let's look at it frame by frame, everyone must watch.

This should be before it arrives, because when you later see Trump start to think, that moment is when the bomber is about to fly over, it's imminent. President Trump should be listening to the national anthem, and then suddenly a sound comes from far away to near. You need to know, the bomber flies extremely fast, and in this process it will fly right over your head in an instant. I didn't tell you, you have no idea what happened in the middle! You can see that they are still listening to the anthem. Let's watch, fast‑forward a bit later. Right, you see, just these few seconds, let's not fast‑forward, let everyone watch frame by frame carefully. Immediately, look at Trump's expression, see it? So fast, the bomber flies past, and Trump is still musing, while Xi's expression freezes, he can't make a face, and Xi doesn't even dare look at Trump, did you notice? We'll give you these few seconds.

Play a little longer, watch closely. Oh dear, half of a fifty‑year‑old or a one‑hundred‑and‑fifty‑year‑old is gone, right? Half the work is cut off, and it's gone. Look how cute Trump's expression is! Trump definitely knows there should be a B‑1, he must have arranged it, right? When Trump looks up, because the sound passes so quickly, you can hear it—just a "whoosh" and it's gone. When Trump looks up and says the "whoosh," it's already at his head, so it flew past from this side. Wow, Xi hasn't even reacted.

That reaction speed? Whether it's a B‑1 or a B‑2, think of it as a strategic bomber! You are the enemy nation's Number One, flying over this head! The legislators all say, think about it, the background is Trump welcoming you.

First of all, don't tell me this is some high‑level treatment, you don't need such high‑level. When welcoming, you'd have 21 salutes, a red carpet, a military band, honor guard, and ordinary fighter formations, you don't need to put a bomber here, understand? No ceremony requires you to put a long‑range bomber like a B‑1 in plain sight, low‑altitude over your head. First realize, he is an adversary country, recognized by both parties of the legislators as the executioner who helped Iran strike U.S. forces, causing American casualties—a tragedy that happened just two months ago! The heroes' bones are still warm. Imagine taking Xi to this air base and letting that bomber fly over his head.

When I talk about the sword of Damocles, I said, with Xi here, you probably don't know how many swords are hanging over his head, we didn't even expect the U.S. to stop hanging swords. The U.S. says swords are nothing, we just bring the bomber! Of course we can't drop bombs today, but is this not a warm‑up? In ancient times, seeing a sword meant it might fall and pierce you, leading to beheading. Hey, now think about it, the next time this thing comes over your head, you might hear the familiar "boom" and think, "I've heard that rumble before." But when you can't recall what it is, you might instantly transcend. The next time you hear that sound, people are still on the ground, and after hearing it, they go to the sky! You have to think about that.

So Trump's little expression, look, it's really cute, I've watched it many times. Look, why does Trump smile? I ask everyone, why does President Trump smile so cutely? As the commander‑in‑chief of the three services, hasn't he seen a B‑1?

During that White House parade, when the bomber flew over, did anyone notice? What did Trump look like? This year especially, the 250th anniversary of liberty, all kinds of parades, when President Trump saw the formation flying, when was he ever that cute? Isn't he always solemn, standing there, saluting, hand on chest, a respectful posture? I'm not just spouting nonsense, we don't tell stories, we tell facts, right? I'm not a literary scholar, I spend my days here, the thing I'm best at is telling stories, I don't have that skill, right? For me, making up stories is harder than writing a paper. So I'll give you the solid facts, you can look it up yourself: whether it's the British king, the 250th liberty celebration, or Independence Day, when did Trump ever have that mischievous expression while a formation flew overhead?

And it was personally arranged by him, right? By logic, when President Trump met Putin he also arranged a B‑2 bomber or something. Trump's expression then was, we won't call it serious, at least it looked normal, official, right? Today this expression, I can imagine Trump thinking: "Hey, he finally scared you, haha! You didn't expect that, did you? Look at the big show I arranged! You didn't see it coming? There's still two minutes left, our first meeting at this airport is about to end. I have a big gift for you." Oh dear, so cute!

It is very obvious that Trump had already preset what Xi's state would be, right? And he couldn't help himself, he was laughing wildly here. So you see, this is a state banquet occasion with the highest treatment, isn't it? Have we analyzed this thoroughly enough? Has everyone noticed this?

The 50 Cent Party members have gone crazy today, cursing wildly. Let me tell you, if the curses of the 50 Cent Party were useful, why would Xi be so startled here? These paid online trolls have been cultivated for so many years, yet they couldn't stop Trump from giving Xi a show of force, nor could they protect their master from being startled. Alas, I must say, you 50 Cent Party trolls, stop changing your disguises and go hang yourselves quickly. If you don't commit suicide to atone, you're not worthy of the money you've been paid as trolls, are you?

It's hilarious here. You guys who come here to jump around, you see, every single 50 Cent Party troll who has left a comment here today, whether they are from state security or public security, has heard our interpretation of Xi being startled at Andrews Air Force Base today. In other words, according to Xi's way of playing, right? If you hear something you shouldn't, how can you prove you are still loyal to me? So all you leaders of the 50 Cent Party trolls have listened to our program and can no longer prove your innocence. You can only go back like those who ate bowls of noodles and quickly hang yourselves to prove your innocence, and maybe your whole family will be spared. I'm putting it out there, right? So for other 50 Cent Party members, I think it's smarter not to come out and leave these comments, it can only expose yourselves.

Oh, look at Trump's expression. The key is that Xi hadn't even reacted yet. Let me tell you, this shows it. Xi really didn't have this arranged in advance. Otherwise, if he knew that bombers would fly overhead to welcome him, right? If the White House was going to do this B-2 flyover for him tomorrow, you'd see if Xi would look up tomorrow. He would definitely look up and say, "Hey, this is arranged for me anyway. What does it look like? I don't care what you think, this is my prestige, we'll brag about it when we get back." Wouldn't that be the state? He just didn't react today.

Have you noticed? Look, Trump's eyes followed the bombers in this direction, while Xi was still there thinking, "Hey, what just happened? Why is there a rumbling sound during the American national anthem?" Xi was probably thinking, "Hey, the Americans really don't do things well. Unlike our CCP, where everything is rehearsed and there can't be a single extraneous sound. The American national anthem is mixed with the rumbling of the air force base. The Americans' arrangements are not as meticulous as ours."

So Xi was completely stunned here because listening to the American national anthem was just going through the motions for him. As he was listening, suddenly there was a rumbling sound, and he didn't expect what Trump was doing at all. President Trump's expression was so rich, and it had been several seconds, yet Xi still didn't know what was going on, feeling a sense of "Who am I, where am I, what am I doing?"

Oh my goodness! From this, you can see that Trump is almost ten years older than Xi, yet his reaction, his expression, his authenticity, his humanity, his sense of being alive, makes Xi look like what? Really, this is not one representing humanity and the other representing the public enemy of mankind. It's a vivid demonstration for everyone to see. Why else would I say that there would be good shows from the moment Xi stepped off the plane this time? Did everyone really not expect the show to come in this way? Didn't you all think at most there would be something on the tarmac?

Especially look, Xi is most afraid of reporters' questions, and Trump thoughtfully didn't arrange for any reporters to ask questions. Just when it seemed like nothing could happen, look at this, Trump's mouth hadn't closed for several seconds. Then you see Xi finally understood at this moment and turned his head to see what that thing was. By the time he understood what it was, I guess he still had to ponder what it was, but at least he understood it should be a bomber.

Think about it, this is not about whether you steal their technology and copy it back home. Really, at this moment, think about it. You went to an enemy country, and once you're there, who knows what anyone is planning? Let's say, people didn't know what Trump's private conversations were like before. Remember when I specifically told you about Fauci's diary? Fauci said that when he held press conferences in the Rose Garden at the White House during the epidemic, Trump privately seemed to respect him and listen to him.

In reality, Fauci wrote bitterly one day that Trump privately said to him when they left the office: "Anthony, I know you are a smart person, and I am also smart. I know you have your ways, but I also have my ways. We must protect this country together, don't let this country have problems." What a clear threat that was! After Trump said that privately to Fauci, if it weren't for Fauci's diary, who would have known that Trump came out smiling and respecting Fauci so much? You think, during the epidemic in April or May 2020, the private situation was so tense.

So in this situation, my God, Xi definitely hasn't figured out what this is yet. We say, Trump doesn't even need to talk to him, and you can tell just by thinking about your toe why Trump always praises Xi, saying that talking to him is straightforward, he doesn't beat around the bush. Compare that to how Fauci talks—indirect, roundabout, all kinds of packaging—and you’ll see that when Xi meets Trump privately, it’s like a more direct, drier, more gun‑powder‑filled, sword‑drawn version of the Fauci‑Trump meeting.

So in this case, if both people meet privately in that state, and you come in, who doesn’t know that after smiling on the surface they secretly want to stab each other? How many times has Xi wanted to kill Trump? Isn’t Trump the kind of guy who keeps a little notebook? Is his notebook way more sophisticated than yours? He has AI to keep track for him. And in this state, Trump lets a bomber, a strategic bomber, fly low over your head without warning you first? Wow, right, the golden‑mane lion king greedily devours a wild boar head—yeah, that’s spot on.

Then a few seconds later, he snaps back to reality! You see him twist his body, lift his head, probably thinking, “What act is this?” and his facial expression freezes. The smile that follows is neither a smile nor a laugh nor a cry, nothing at all, his head doesn’t move, as if he’s frozen. If there isn’t a reporter moving nearby as a reference point, Xi looks like a still image.

The key is, did you notice, Trump’s business isn’t over. The national anthem ends, Trump can’t hold back, clearly asking, “Was that spectacular or not? How did you feel? Was the B‑1 cool?” Right, that’s where it gets interesting.

I tell you, it’s not over yet, because didn’t I just say? When Xi stepped off the plane, I was wondering, “Whoa, can Xi now communicate in simple English? Why does it seem like he could talk to Trump?” But probably there was a small translator there, right? In this shot you can see it—no translator, actually. Trump babbles a few lines, reaches out and pats Xi, and Xi cooperatively smiles.

What do you think Xi said? I’ll tell you, Xi must have said, “Where’s my translator?” Because look, Xi… let me rewind for you, watch carefully. Just now, after Trump and Xi finished, Trump said several things, right? He definitely mentioned the B‑1. And what’s Xi doing? He’s looking for the translator, did you see that?

I think it must be Peng Liyuan, who knows a few simple English phrases, because I saw a kid handing flowers to a child nearby, and it seemed there was no translator. Even when he talks with Melania behind him, it could be simple. The point is, when Trump arranged for the B‑1 to go over, asked if it was spectacular, Xi’s expression—now you get it—when Trump pats him, smiling while speaking, Xi mutters that he didn’t understand anything. He’s looking for a translator.

In other words, Trump arranged an unexpected bomber, flew low over Xi’s head, and completely confused him. Xi’s mind is a mess, and he only thinks, “What just happened? Where’s my translator? What did you say?” That answers my earlier confusion: Xi doesn’t have the skill for direct dialogue; he needs a little translator there.

So you see, after the translation, this is right before getting on the bus—Xi recovers, at least now that he has a translator he finds his soul again, right? He can say the usual platitudes, do whatever. And did you see? He raised his hand, meaning “uh‑huh,” for sure. Trump says, “Are you satisfied with the plane show?” Right? Xi is basically being led by the nose, his brain not processing fast enough. He probably didn’t expect it and thought, “Whoa, that’s scary.”

But Trump immediately says, “It was good, right? This was specially prepared for you! This is the highest‑level treatment we can give, nobody else gets.” Those two lines completely win over and confuse Xi. Maybe tonight Xi will slowly figure out what happened, depending on whether his dog‑head sidekick and the Shuntian Times dare tell him the truth.

I realized that after I mentioned those little 5‑cent “wumao” guys, they stopped changing avatars. Maybe those 5‑cents don’t dare go back and tell Xi what the B‑1 and B‑2 represent? Too funny. The 5‑cents that just popped up, shouting and killing, got scared off after we said a few heartfelt words. It’s hilarious! You think they’re useless, or maybe they’ve already gone back to self‑destruct. Anyway, now you see, no more 5‑cents, we’re just talking about Xi.

His smile is definitely going to change back, because why is he smiling at this moment? Let me tell you, Xi, you need to know now, he hasn't figured this out yet. Normal people subconsciously don't want to think in the worst direction; this is a psychological state of self-protection. Especially Xi, who chickens out whenever something happens. You know, Xi used to pretend to be timid when facing problems, letting the older generation of leaders see this honest young man.

So Xi, when he doesn't know what's happening, has already developed a muscle reflex. His muscle reflex is: when I don't know what's going on, I'll first put on that silly smile to make you lower your guard, to make you think: "Well, this kid may not be smart, but he's a sincere person." Right? Useful, do you understand? So, combine what we've discussed before with psychology and apply it to Xi.

Then you'll understand. His smile doesn't mean he's figured it out now. What does it mean for a B-1 to fly overhead? On the contrary, it's a protective coloration he puts out when he's flustered or even at a loss, when he's not psychologically prepared. This is his muscle reflex. So, no matter what Trump is telling him now, look at the next few seconds, he didn't say much. Xi still pretended to say a couple of things, probably Xi would say something like: "Oh, Trump said that B-1 was impressive, specially prepared for you." Then Xi would follow up: "Ah, it was impressive. Oh, I knew we were good buddies." He'd say, "That's why they say we have a good relationship. I was happy when I saw it just now, thank you for the hospitality." How could Trump not smile? I dare say Trump even said: "I know Xi, only I can manipulate Xi." That's the situation.

Why was Trump smiling so happily just now? I suggest everyone make a meme out of it, it's too cute. That's a thousand words, all condensed into Trump's grin, which says: "Heh heh, I knew I'd finished my act today, and he'd still thank me." This fool is so much fun! I say none of you can play this game like I can, right? Only I can. Are you still calling me Trump stingy? These fools! So you see, Trump and Xi were talking seriously for about a minute, and then they both started saying: "You should go back and rest today, it's about time." After just a few seconds, they said goodbye. Then Xi got into the car, and he kept pointing out the window, meaning: "Looks good, right? Looks good?" Oh my goodness! I find this so cute, so much fun.

What does this mean? Isn't it just that the final lesson, the formal class, starts tomorrow? Today, we're just letting you see America's air power, letting you experience and feel the might of the US military firsthand, in a 3D surround sound experience. After all, those who felt it before can't speak anymore, so you can express yourself after feeling it. I think Trump might very well say in a future interview: "Ah, when I graduated Xi, he thanked me, and he expressed great shock." I think Trump will definitely say these things in future speeches or interviews. Because it's obvious that Trump was waiting for this moment, it's too cute, right?

So you see, I said it, Trump arranged this military parade, arranged the B-2, arranged that National Archives. We didn't know about the B-1 back then, and I said at the time that what the US was playing this time was the Sword of Damocles, telling you: You thought I was giving you the highest level of reception, but in reality, I'm letting you understand my strength. If you don't appreciate the toast, you'll have to drink the punishment. I'm putting both the toast and the punishment in front of you. If you kneel today, Open up China, disband the CCP, eliminate your nuclear weapons, explain your virus issue clearly, and actively cooperate in eradicating all your evil axis forces, then the toast is your treatment.

If you try to play tricks with me, let's talk about those who played tricks before, whether it was Maduro, Khamenei, or even Stamo, or even Saudi Arabia, everyone has seen their fate. Xi, you are even more significant than them. So for your punishment, we have the B-1, and the B-2. I remember a song we used to sing when we were kids, something like "If friends come, we have fine wine; if wolves come, we also have weapons." Don't make me sing it, I'm tone-deaf, but I remember this lyric. Everyone who grew up in China probably knows this song well, right?

So you see, why can't Xi understand? Trump playing arcade games is telling you, if you're a friend, there's wine; if you're a wolf, there are weapons. So I'll show you my weapons first, with a shotgun flying over your head. We'll both show them. And if you don't understand, why can I reasonably use a shotgun on you? Don't we also have to go to the National Archives to see? To give you a lesson, it's not that I casually switch from diplomacy to shotguns; we have national archives to support it.

And after I give you a shotgun later, I’ll also put it in the archives. By then you’ll be like that bear head or wild boar head hanging in the archive, right? You’ll become a decorative item, that’s the idea, isn’t it? Right, a big river, this melody is familiar to everyone, so I don’t need to say more, okay? Also, look, there’s a tweet online that specifically captured a scene of a B‑1 flying by, let’s show it.

That’s the B‑1 flying over at the time, two of them, because the White House account confirmed it, the footage only caught one plane soaring past, see? It flashed by in an instant. Once, I thought this was over the city I was in. One day I checked my phone and saw it was a U.S. flight demonstration team, and because an event was scheduled to fly over that spot, I went out to watch. Suddenly a formation of several aircraft swooshed by. Since I wasn’t at the main venue, I was on the periphery, the area they passed through before the inbound‑outbound show, so I was “swoosh” in a flash and almost didn’t react. Even though I went prepared just to see what the plane looked like, it was exciting.

So you can understand, Xi really didn’t react in that instant. Look here, Andrews Air Force Base showing your B‑1, what does that tell you? A bit more: besides scaring you, why do the Americans give Xi a close‑up? To see Xi’s reaction, right? Everyone says it’s almost legendary—got it? Does everyone get what that means? Everyone’s watching the joke, tacitly.

So here I’m telling you about the B‑1, because tomorrow is the B‑2. Today’s B‑1, why is it special? Because the B‑1, as we just said, isn’t a ceremonial aircraft; it’s a conventional weapons platform. What does it do? Long‑range, heavy payload, far‑distance conventional precision strikes. In that process, you carry a large amount of long‑range weapons and launch attacks from outside your defense zone.

Let’s place this in the Indo‑Pacific context, okay? The U.S. is saying, “I’m showing you this B‑1, not just to tell you it’s a bomber, but to show you how we operate now. I don’t need to station all heavy firepower on the First Island Chain; my long‑range bombers can enter the theater from afar, release those long‑range munitions, and then withdraw.” What does that mean? If I need to, you’re not shouting to push the U.S. out of the Western Pacific, right? My B‑1 can quickly dump massive conventional firepower into the Western Pacific theater. You’re busy stirring trouble on that island, aren’t you? Next time you won’t even see me; I’ll have already dropped the munitions. Whoever gets bombed will know, right?

And besides, even though it wasn’t flying with an F‑22, isn’t there a squadron of F‑22s parked nearby? That tells you what the F‑22 means. When an F‑22 is deployed, it signals air superiority, high‑end air combat, stealth fighters. Do you remember what Trump said a couple of days ago? Trump said Iran had a bunch of Chinese‑ or Russian‑made radars that were all blown up. Then they took a break, somehow got a bunch of new radars shipped over, right? The implication is that the CCP secretly sent them new radars, upgraded them. Then Trump said, “Just when they finally installed them, I knocked them out again!” I guess they’re too lazy to install new ones now.

Look, just a few days ago the CCP was bragging that Iran would go anti‑U.S., with a 300,000‑strong army, women on the streets with guns, while Israel and the U.S. casually flew military aircraft over all of Iran, the radars didn’t react at all—only the naked eye. Imagine when that bomber flies over, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, Basij, terrorists on the ground see the U.S.–Israeli warplane, raise the alarm—doesn’t that have a similar flavor?

It’s telling you, when I eventually fly back, you’ll see it with the naked eye, which means I don’t intend to hit you. The ones they saw before didn’t have time to react before being destroyed. I’m letting you see this because today I don’t want to destroy you; otherwise you wouldn’t see what comes next. But if you talk about your defensive weapons, air‑defense radars, etc., today I’ll show you our F‑22, our B‑1. Air superiority, high‑end air combat, fifth‑generation fighters—you haven’t even stolen those yet. We also have large‑scale long‑range conventional strikes. Tomorrow I’ll show you nuclear strike capability, right? I’ll let you see the B‑2 dropping a series of bunker‑busting bombs from a spot the size of a one‑and‑a‑half‑door refrigerator, hitting Fort Dodge precisely and brutally.

See? Trump really put in a lot of effort! Tomorrow, B-2s and F-2s will appear simultaneously again. Our Xi should go back tonight and properly study the meaning behind this. Otherwise, tomorrow he'll be clueless again, thinking they're welcoming him. Oh my, really, that's why I say America provides instruction but not guarantees. You can look, but if you don't get it, then I can't help you. It's the same with the archives, right? You come, I can only do my best to let you see. If you can't learn it, then you can only say it depends on fate! So this is very interesting.

Let me put it this way, no one truly understands American diplomatic protocol enough to interpret today's B-1s, and two of them flying in formation without prior notification, as "Oh, we're so close that we're welcoming you." That's not it. Even if you were an ally, if they used this to welcome you, it would be unprecedented. If you are an ally, and you know you are an ally of the United States, then let me tell you, this is a display of intertwined national power and military strength.

As for all the bad things Xi has done, with a B-1 flying directly over your head, you should really think about when you'll see a B-1 again. Really, it's too cute, too cute.

And then today, after Beshear said so much, let's look at reactions from other areas. Because Beshear already said: "Today in Washington, He Lifeng and I had substantive discussions on US-China economic relations, preparing for the upcoming meeting between President Trump and Chairman Xi. Our discussions continued to focus on how to ensure China makes substantive commitments to protect American workers, farmers, and businesses, while advancing American economic and national security interests."

Let's say, Xi doesn't even dare to bring entrepreneurs over, and you're still here? Does this He Lifeng think he can fool America? Isn't that exactly what America means by substantive commitments? It means don't try to fool me, I'll have you by the neck! You have to give me what I want! We are in control of this process.

If we really talk about He Lifeng, or Xie Feng, who among them will become the next Alagchi of the CCP? Because in this process, whether it's Xie Feng shouting about drawing red lines and not decoupling, or He Lifeng saying, "Oh, let me talk to you, China and the US can't just cut off relations." Does America not know how to handle these two? Are these two so stupid that they genuinely believe Xi is the future of the world, a goal of 150 years, a lifespan of 500 years, enjoying his twilight years, and the Xi dynasty will last for ten thousand generations, like an emperor?

Really, we should say that Xi should now think about handling negotiations himself in the future. If any of the people he sends have ulterior motives and become like Alagchi, then when they demand diplomatic security protection someday, it will be too late.

Let's talk about a paid commenter who jumped out asking if everyone had mooncakes. I know that the mooncakes distributed by major factories like BYD in your CCP country are such that after eating them in 2025, you still have to create an Excel sheet for the entire company to record cases of vomiting and diarrhea, and food poisoning. Whether there are mooncakes for the Mid-Autumn Festival or bonuses, these paid commenters are the ones who jump out on our show to say such things. It shows that after I finished talking about those things, you dare not say anything else, so you can only say something bland here. But it is precisely your short-sightedness, your shallow vision, that makes me suspect that paid commenters like Tom Huang 875 should be like a labor camp inmate who gets a mooncake and gets so fat. Why? He's just like Guo Wengui, who after staying at MDC for two years, was rumored to have an apple one day and was so hungry that he shared it with the little spies of the New China Federal. Those spies didn't have brains either, saying Mr. Guo is so happy today, he has an apple to eat, he's eating so well, completely forgetting the state they previously boasted about, where Mr. Guo was eating delicacies every day. They are slapping themselves in the face! This is really interesting! A little paid commenter actually thinks whether there are mooncakes to eat is... is it a show of strength? Or to make us feel sad? We have no mooncakes to eat! We really miss the five-kernel, sugary, oily mixtures, right? It's hilarious! Today, I've really gotten used to it, watching you paid commenters is quite amusing.

As for the arms sales to Taiwan that the CCP is so concerned about, remember what I told you? Don't worry about the arms sales to Taiwan. The arms sales to Taiwan depend only on the negotiations between the US and Taiwan. As for whether they will deliver in the next few days, or before the end of the year, that does not equate to whether Xi comes here. It depends on the US's own arms production schedule. Today, Rubio directly verified my analysis. Everyone remembers that I analyzed this issue just a couple of days ago. First, today's good news from Rubio is that President Trump officially signed the document appointing him as National Security Advisor. Because Mike Waltz resigned after the signal gate, Rubio is acting in that position, including the director of the National Archives is also acting.

But because he performed so well, President Trump officially appointed him today. In other words, there is only one precedent in modern American history: Henry Kissinger holding both the Secretary of State and National Security Advisor positions simultaneously. Kissinger served under Nixon and Ford in the 1970s, holding both roles at the same time. Moreover, the National Security Advisor position does not require Senate confirmation. So you can see what this indicates: the pro‑China Kissinger era has completely ended, and the era of destroying the CCP is now the Rubio era. Trump and Rubio, a double‑edged sword, mark a milestone for the anti‑CCP era on the day Xi visits.

Let's say how the CCP has been cursing Rubio, how angry the CCP is. You see, Xi has said he hates Rubio the most. Today Rubio officially assumes the National Security Advisor role, and the day after tomorrow you will visit that national archive where the director is also Rubio, making you feel that everything is tied to him, and the things you worry about are decided by Rubio and Trump together. Isn't that painful?

We see a particularly funny "50‑cent" (internet troll), I have to read it out! One 50‑cent said: "The host thinks that living in a stable feels like being a horse." That statement is absurd. First, your logic has a fatal flaw: the one born in a stable is not us, it is Jesus. Jesus was born in a stable but never thought of himself as a horse, right? Jesus came to earth to spread the gospel for God. So your sentence just makes us laugh out loud. Moreover, people like you who grew up in this "vitality pool" and think of yourselves as excrement—we simply cannot continue this discussion with you. Everyone is just looking for a laugh!

Now look at Rubio. Isn't he at the UN General Assembly now? He gave a series of remarks today; we will focus on two points. One is about the so‑called external criticism that questions how President Trump could invite Xi to the United States and receive him with such high‑level hospitality. Rubio responded forcefully: "Let me tell you, the United States and China likely possess the two most powerful militaries in the world. It would be irresponsible and absurd to think we should not engage with them at the highest level. We must engage. U.S.–China relations will determine the direction of the 21st century, the trajectory of this century. Even at the height of the Cold War, even when faced with the threat of nuclear annihilation, even when the very existence of life on Earth was at stake, the United States still maintained communication with Russian officials. This is not a small country."

See, Rubio's point is that you want a sensational story: Trump slaps Xi, then the CCP disappears, decoupling happens, and so on. That's a fantasy drama. The real play is step by step, with rhythm and method, making you think that the BEB (the "Bureau of Economic..."?) welcomes you, right? Moreover, Rubio said that even at the peak of the Cold War the U.S. kept communication with the Soviet Union. But the Soviet Union later collapsed, right? So maintaining communication and meetings with Xi does not mean the CCP will not later dissolve or that China will open up, does it? It's very interesting!

And regarding Taiwan, today the "Capitol Hill Gazette" published Rubio's speech. Rubio started by saying the topic is that U.S. arms sales to Taiwan are constrained by U.S. own needs and defense‑industrial base. The article explains that U.S. sales to Taiwan largely involve balancing industrial capacity and military‑industrial considerations. It’s not specifically about Taiwan; it’s about, whatever you sell, you must consider whether you also need it yourself, right? He said that when we conduct arms sales, whether to Taiwan or other regions or countries, we must consider our own needs and whether we also require those weapons.

So this also responds to the letter from senators before Xi’s visit, which urged the release of security assistance funds for Taiwan, including arms sales, and warned not to be intimidated by the CCP, urging strong support for Taiwan. On the other hand, Rubio noted that the United States has its own considerations, especially as it is currently conducting military operations, and we have obligations in the Indo‑Pacific, the Southern Command, NATO, and other commitments. Therefore we must weigh various factors, not just the current deployment situation.

In other words, whether to sell to Taiwan is not decided by Xi, but by the overall U.S. strategy. If the United States now feels there’s no urgency to sell these items, I can use them directly, without needing to provide them to Taiwan. Or I could place them on an island for others, such as Japan, the Philippines, or a U.S. base in South Korea, and it doesn’t have to go to Taiwan, right? Moreover, the Taiwanese Ministry of Defense issued a statement—actually a media comment—saying, "The U.S. government and Congress have repeatedly expressed support for Taiwan’s self‑defense capabilities. We will continue close coordination with the Department of Defense to ensure arms sales proceed as planned." See? And Zhu Rongtai also expressed confidence in U.S.–Taiwan relations.

So it's not about whether the CCP shouts or not, it's just as we've told you before, the US has its own rhythm. Xi has no leverage but has to pretend he does, which is very embarrassing, you know? Thanks Wanwan for saying their master is startled, today they only dare to cry out in pain here, not to fight them. Happy Mid-Autumn Festival, great! This Wanwan, and Will, who said the startled Baozi, a historic moment. Yes, yes, there's more drama tomorrow, today is just an appetizer! With this appetizer, you can say, the next day, exactly until the last day, September 25th is also the Mid-Autumn Festival, everyone celebrates together, this big drama is continuous, oh, it's so joyful, right? Okay, that's all for today.