关于V字旅的几点说明

补充几点。我知道你们天天盯着并会打印我的帖文，昨天部分人出镜后，你们开了紧急会议；我也知道你们拿着早前公布的成员照片到处搜捕；我还知道你们曾给合作侨商下过针对我们的指令，但他现在的状况，恐怕不是你们想见到的吧？一会儿再跟你们说，先回应与我们接触的潜在盟友们几个问题：

我们欢迎但审慎处理合作事宜。

V字旅不是一个政党组织，无意参与复杂的政治设计，许多工作应交给未来的立法者们，现在纠结为之尚早，而且让一个准军事组织越俎代庖，似乎从一开始就不太符合宪政的逻辑，你们觉得呢？

我们支持经过选举授权的民意机构所代表的意志。单个政党的纲领和行事符合我们期望的，我们也会支持它。若上述二者都迟迟没有出现，到必要时，我们也会考虑自组政党。其实中文圈不是没有具备现代议政素养的人，我个人就觉得某些人挺不错。

对于政治盟友，我们先小人后君子，有什么诉求无需藏着掖着，直接摆到台面上。V字旅将自身定位为未来国防军和安全情报系统的前身，这意味着当时间到了，我们希望主导军队与安全系统的重建工作。推翻中共的斗争将是血腥残酷的，我们无疑将牺牲许多人，对致力于相关领域工作的我们来说，有此诉求也是自然而然的事情。如果有其它组织在这些领域比我们更专业，牺牲更大，我们自然也支持他们同样的诉求。

再跟党国阵营的人啰嗦几句：

首先，我对政权更迭后的屠戮式清洗并不热衷。审查是必要的，但大部分旧政权的公务员都不会受到什么影响，其人身财产安全包括养老金将得到保障，许多人还会被留任。

其次，由于我与安全系统的历史渊源，我可能对你们更宽容，也对你们有更务实的计划。除某些严重作恶者，部分协从者也许会被特赦，许多人可能同样被留任，并执行新政权的新指令——搜捕前政权的罪犯。毕竟，没有什么人比你们更熟悉那些老相识，不是么？

中共倒台的过程可能是漫长血腥的，你来我往的过招也并不稀奇。在工作职责内的正常敌对，符合交战规则的，泰然处之即可，但最好都别越线。

什么算越线，我想不用一一列举，都是老油条了，心知肚明，但有一点还是说开些，不用遮遮掩掩虚伪客套——任何针对我们成员及我个人人身安全的恶意行动，将会招致报复，参与执行和决策的，可能会被无预警处决。

斗争当然是残酷的，但也总是会结束的。我建议保持必要的克制，让中国的转型尽可能流最少的血。你们也最好希望将来是我来处理你们的历史问题，换作别人，恐怕对你们就没那么宽大了。

反共. I know you have been monitoring and printing my posts every day. After some individuals appeared in public yesterday, you held an emergency meeting. I also know that you have been using previously published photos of our members to hunt us down. Moreover, I am aware that you once issued directives against us to cooperating overseas Chinese merchants. But given his current situation, I doubt it turned out the way you expected, right?

I’ll get back to you later, but first, let me respond to a few questions from potential allies who wish to engage with us:

We welcome cooperation but handle it with caution.

The V Brigade is not a political party and has no intention of engaging in complex political designs. Many tasks should be left to future legislators. At this stage, it is premature to dwell on such matters. Moreover, having a paramilitary organization overstep its role from the outset does not seem to align with constitutional logic, don’t you think?

We support the will represented by democratically elected institutions. If the platform and actions of a particular political party align with our expectations, we will support it. If neither of these emerges for an extended period, we may consider forming our own party when necessary. In fact, the Chinese-speaking world is not lacking in individuals with modern parliamentary capabilities. Personally, I find certain individuals quite competent.

As for political allies, we prefer to be upfront before forming deeper trust. If you have demands, don’t hide them—lay everything out on the table. The V Brigade envisions itself as the predecessor of the future national defense and security intelligence system. This means that when the time comes, we hope to take the lead in rebuilding the military and security system. The struggle to overthrow the CCP will be bloody and brutal, and we will undoubtedly sacrifice many. For those of us dedicated to this field, such an expectation is only natural. If other organizations prove to be more professional in these areas and make even greater sacrifices, we would naturally support their claims to leadership in these fields as well.

Now, a few words for those in the Party-State camp:

First, I have no particular enthusiasm for a purge-style reckoning after regime change. While vetting will be necessary, the vast majority of civil servants from the former regime will not be significantly affected. Their personal and financial security, including pensions, will be safeguarded, and many will even be retained.

Second, due to my historical connections with the security apparatus, I may be more lenient toward you and have more pragmatic plans. Aside from those who have committed serious crimes, some collaborators may be granted amnesty, and many will likely be retained to carry out the new government’s directives—such as hunting down criminals of the former regime. After all, who would be more familiar with those old acquaintances than you?

The downfall of the CCP may be a long and bloody process, and tactical exchanges between us are to be expected. As long as they fall within professional duties and follow the rules of engagement, we can take them in stride. But it’s best not to cross the line.

I don’t think I need to spell out what “crossing the line” means. We are all seasoned players and understand it well. However, let’s make one thing explicitly clear—no need for pretense or empty courtesies: any malicious action against our members or my personal safety will result in retaliation. Those involved in executing or making such decisions may face sudden and unannounced elimination.

Struggles are always cruel, but they also always come to an end. I advise exercising necessary restraint to ensure that China’s transition involves as little bloodshed as possible. You should also hope that it is me handling your historical reckoning—if it were someone else, I fear they would be far less lenient toward you.