中國人權律師團宣告：強烈譴責南昌當局再次把李宜雪強制送精神病院

2024年12月22日，南昌市公安局西湖分局和西湖區南浦街道辦事處聯合通報：李宜雪被街道社群依法依規送診。

我們不禁要問： 一、李宜雪再次被送診，送到了哪個精神病院？ 二、官方稱依法依規送診，依的是哪條法規？ 三、侮辱誹謗是自訴案件，筷子巷派出所為什麼介入李宜雪和他人的糾紛？ 四、家屬對李宜雪被送診的情況是什麼態度，能否由第三方獨立採訪並公開披露？

李宜雪在幾乎一邊倒的社會輿論支援下仍然再次被強制關入精神病院引發全閘道器注，而這一次她能否精神正常地走出精神病院牽動著億萬網友的心。很多人感慨，超過10億的流量和舉國之力救不了一個李宜雪。

其實這種悲劇性的結局在近年早已上演不止一次。2022年初和2023年初，舉國關注和幾十億的流量同樣不能讓鐵鏈女獲得自由，也逼不出胡鑫宇的失蹤和死亡真相。當然，與身陷囹圄的鐵鏈女和陰陽兩隔的胡鑫宇相比，李宜雪還算是幸運，她擁有著蓬勃的生命、燦爛的年華、率真的個性和自由的生活，當她遭遇不公時，她尚有機會利用法律為自己申張權益，能利用網路對邪惡體制進行輿論反擊。李宜雪在對抗暴政中展現出的勇氣與真性情，給當代中國社會留下了一幅濃墨重彩的寶貴畫卷。

率真的李宜雪可能並不清楚，10億的播放量不但未能救她，恰恰是她被二次強制關 入精神病院訊息的網路流量。當局所針對的已經不是她李宜雪個人，而是針對社會輿論和普遍的民意樹立暴力機關和暴力政權的權威，反映的是獨裁者的傲慢和霸道！借用他們抨擊前蘇聯迫害異議人士的一句話：為了在國內強化法西斯專政，他們加緊利用“精神病院”作為鎮壓人民的工具。他們對不滿和反抗其反動統治的持不同政見者扣上“精神病”的帽子後投入“精神病院”任意迫害，其手法之殘暴比希特勒當年的集中營和監獄有過之而無不及！

李宜雪事件的網路反應。

前媒體人趙蘭健12月20日在X上發帖說：“江西省公安系統一直是以黑社會的方式強 加管制敏感案件，李宜雪已被江西省公安系統迫害致殘。胡鑫宇案件也是江西省公安廳一手操辦的糊弄老百姓的冤假錯案。李宜雪舉報江西省精神病院，揭示了中共利用精神病院，作為國家暴力工具迫害普通生命。李宜雪旁證出中共系統正在實施反人類行為，應受到法庭審判，追究中共的反人類行為的責任。儘早制止中共系統再繼續作惡迫害普通人的生命。”

曾經遭受當局精神病院折磨的界立建12月23日在X上發帖說：“每一次揭開自己被關 押精神病迫害的痛苦傷疤，每一次都是痛苦的回憶，痛得喘不過氣來。精神病醫院的暴徒護工們比看守所監獄惡警還要兇殘歹毒萬倍、精神病院最邪惡的手段就是抽取你腦脊液、人為製造成痴呆植物人，逼迫家屬簽字接出醫院，不到一年受害者就去世。進入醫院一刻對你的各種檢測包括血常規、心電圖、磁共振CT、抽取大量血液、驗尿等各種檢測都是在為供體配型做準備，精神病院……更是器官買賣的交易市場。”

中國法律學者杜文12月23日在X上發帖說：“我們必須明確地指出：在任何一個正常的社會，若存在獨立的司法、媒體監督、以及對公權力的有效制衡，就不可能出現這種’想關誰就關誰’的情形。可是為什麼在中國屢見不鮮？為什麼類似的事情還一直在不斷重演？為什麼在這片土地上，針對‘被精神病’的控告幾乎沒有一例能獲得真正公正的審判？這背後的根源正是中共長期的極權統治！正是它建構起一整套高壓維穩體系，使得無數黑箱操作有恃無恐，使得醫院、公安、地方政府與其穿一條褲子、互相勾結，把公民最基本的自由與尊嚴踐踏在腳下。”

共產暴政的產物，透過精神病院迫害民眾由來已久。

早在2002年，著名民主人士胡平就寫過一篇專著《誰是瘋子——政治迫害的新招 術》，揭露從蘇聯時代一直到中共如何利用精神病院對民眾實施政治迫害。胡平在文章中寫道：“以精神病的名義實行政治迫害，這種迫害有兩大特點：第一，它罔顧法律，繞開法律，沒有判罪的名義，卻有判罪的效果。實際上是法外施刑，比那些以法律的名義治罪的方式還更狡猾、更陰險、更無恥。第二，關進精神病院常常比關進監獄還更殘酷，因為它可以在治療的名義下用藥物和其它物理手段（如用電棍進行所謂休克治療）直接破壞人的神經系統，摧殘人的精神。事實上，它不是把精神病人治好成正常人，而是把正常人治壞成精神病。若問這些異議人士、工運人士或法輪功成員真的是精神病、是瘋子嗎？不是，肯定不是。如果真是瘋子，當局倒不會把他們關進精神病院了。”

胡平說：“七十年代，蘇聯著名異議人士麥德維耶夫寫過一本書《誰是瘋子？》，揭 露了蘇聯克格勃利用精神病院折磨迫害各種異議人士的嚴重罪行。如今，當局繼承其衣缽，變本加厲，雖然眼下我們還沒有完整系統的披露，但僅就我們已經知道的零星事實，足以令人觸目驚心。”

資深媒體人郭君在近期的一期《菁英論壇》節目中表示，中共當局很早就設立了專門的精神病醫院――安康醫院，並且把政治異議人士關押在裡面，這個醫院的主管單位就是公安局。郭君說：“中共是在1987年左右開始設立安康醫院的，有意思的是很多其它的醫院也自稱是安康醫院，但公安部絕對不會去禁止別人用這個名詞，所以就真真假假混在一起。

1990年有一個檔案特別強調說，有三種瘋子公安機關可以把他們送進精神病院，第一種叫做花瘋子，就是流浪漢；第二種是武瘋子，就是犯病的時候會動武的；第三種叫做政治瘋子，包括貼政治標語、喊政治口號的人。”

郭君說：“這次李宜雪被關進的江西省精神病院，是不是這種安康醫院，我們現在還不知道，但現在已經不重要了，因為所有的精神病院，都百分之百和公安員警有配合。現在所謂的政治瘋子已經不只是貼標語或者喊口號，有其它的政治言論和文章也 可以送到精神病院，這也就是前蘇聯的做法。”

李宜雪被精神病事件反映了中共體制之惡。

李宜雪最初被送入精神病院是因為她說出了輔警猥褻的真相，被送入精神病院是當局封口和進行懲戒的標準程式，也是中共邪惡體制的基本運作模式。李宜雪出院後將江西省精神病院告上法庭，是要告訴人們真相：自己不是精神病，是正常人。在打官司以及在與警方交涉的過程中，李宜雪拒絕接受私了，她要求透過法律得到一個公道，這依然是率真的體現。

凡是在性格中保持著率真天性的那些人，都相信世界上應該存在且必須存在著公平、公正、公道，認為這就是我們這個世界執行的底層邏輯和崇高真理。如果世界失去了這些基本價值觀，失去了這些底層邏輯和真理的光芒，那我們就必須把它們恢復出 來，以讓人們生活的有尊嚴、有骨氣、有秩序、有希望，這也是我們人類在這個世界存在的基本意義。

李宜雪在影片中表現出她是一個不虛偽、不媚俗、不願被潛規則之人，是一個試圖按照普世原則率真生活的正常人。然而以謊言和暴力為底層邏輯構築的中共邪惡體制一定要打壓、封口甚至滅口這樣的正常人。中共依然試圖將秉持率真個性的正常女孩李宜雪“鑑定”為精神病。只要中共的暴政依然存在，發生在中國人身上的這些悲劇就不會終止。

我們關注李宜雪事件的意義。

對一個人的不公就是對所有人的威脅，我們關注李宜雪就是希望我們自己哪一天不經我們本人或者家屬同意，當局不敢把我們拖進精神病院。李宜雪未來的命運讓無數人牽掛，已經成為中國當代歷史的一個標誌性事件。李宜雪點燃的光亮不會熄滅，因為它是無數前人早已點亮的那盞神聖火炬的傳遞和延續，是普世文明的火種在當代中國人心中不滅的體現。

中國人權律師團律師 2025年1月4

Statement by the Chinese Human Rights Lawyers Group: Strong Condemnation of Nanchang Authorities for Forcibly Sending Li Yixue to a Psychiatric Hospital Again

On December 22, 2024, the Xihu Branch of the Nanchang Public Security Bureau and the Nanpu Subdistrict Office of Xihu District jointly announced: Li Yixue was sent to the hospital by the street community according to laws and regulations.

We cannot help but ask:

Where has Li Yixue been sent this time, and which psychiatric hospital is involved? The authorities claim the transfer was done according to laws and regulations—what specific law or regulation justifies this? Defamation is a private prosecution case, so why did the Kuai Zixiang Police Station intervene in the dispute between Li Yixue and others? What is the family’s stance on Li Yixue being sent to the hospital? Could independent third-party interviews and disclosures shed light on this matter? Despite overwhelming public support for her, Li Yixue has once again been forcibly sent to a psychiatric hospital, triggering widespread concern across the internet. This time, millions of people are anxiously hoping she can leave the hospital mentally intact. Many lament that even with over a billion views and nationwide attention, one Li Yixue cannot be saved.

Such tragic outcomes are not unprecedented in recent years. In early 2022 and early 2023, widespread public attention and tens of billions of views could neither secure freedom for the "chained woman" nor uncover the truth about Hu Xinyu’s disappearance and death. However, compared to the imprisoned chained woman and the late Hu Xinyu, Li Yixue is relatively fortunate. She is young, vibrant, candid, and living freely. When she encounters injustice, she has the opportunity to use the law to defend her rights and leverage the internet to fight back against an oppressive system through public opinion. The courage and sincerity Li Yixue has shown in her resistance against tyranny have left a powerful and invaluable legacy in contemporary Chinese society.

Perhaps candid Li Yixue does not realize that the billion views have not saved her; rather, they have fueled the attention surrounding her second forced hospitalization. The target of the authorities is no longer just Li Yixue as an individual but rather an effort to assert the authority of violent institutions and regimes over public opinion and societal sentiment. This reflects the arrogance and tyranny of dictators. To borrow their own criticism of the former Soviet Union: “To strengthen fascist dictatorship domestically, they intensify their use of 'psychiatric hospitals' as tools to suppress the people.” Labeling dissidents as "mentally ill" and incarcerating them in psychiatric hospitals constitutes persecution comparable to, if not worse than, Hitler's concentration camps and prisons.

Online Reactions to the Li Yixue Incident Former journalist Zhao Lanjian posted on X (formerly Twitter) on December 20: “The Jiangxi provincial public security system has always handled sensitive cases in a mafia-like manner. Li Yixue has been persecuted to the point of disability by the Jiangxi Public Security Bureau. The Hu Xinyu case was also a fabricated sham orchestrated by the Jiangxi Public Security Department to deceive the public. Li Yixue’s exposure of Jiangxi’s psychiatric hospital reveals how the CCP uses psychiatric hospitals as tools of state violence to oppress ordinary citizens. Li Yixue’s testimony shows that the CCP system is committing crimes against humanity. This system must face judicial scrutiny and accountability to stop its atrocities against ordinary people.”

On December 23, Jieli Jian, who has also suffered from psychiatric hospital abuse, posted on X: “Every time I reopen the scars of being confined and abused in a psychiatric hospital, it’s a painful reminder, suffocating in agony. The caregivers in psychiatric hospitals are a thousand times more vicious than prison guards. The most evil tactic is to extract spinal fluid, turning victims into vegetative states or mentally disabled individuals, forcing families to sign for their discharge, and leaving them to die within a year. The so-called medical tests—bloodwork, CT scans, MRIs, urine tests—are often preparation for organ matching. Psychiatric hospitals are trading hubs for organs.”

On December 23, Chinese legal scholar Du Wen posted on X: “In any normal society, with independent judiciary oversight, media scrutiny, and effective checks on public power, such arbitrary detentions would not occur. But why are such incidents so rampant in China? Why do they keep happening? And why are lawsuits challenging wrongful ‘psychiatric detentions’ almost universally denied justice? The root lies in the CCP’s long-standing authoritarian rule. Its high-pressure stability maintenance system enables unchecked abuses, allowing hospitals, police, and local governments to collude and trample on citizens’ basic freedoms and dignity.”

The CCP’s Use of Psychiatric Hospitals for Political Persecution As early as 2002, renowned pro-democracy activist Hu Ping authored a monograph, Who Are the Lunatics? A New Tool of Political Persecution, exposing how both the Soviet Union and the CCP have used psychiatric hospitals for political persecution. Hu Ping wrote: “Political persecution in the guise of psychiatric treatment has two distinctive features. First, it bypasses the law and imposes extrajudicial punishment. It is even more cunning, insidious, and shameless than legal sentencing. Second, confinement in psychiatric hospitals is often more brutal than imprisonment because it involves using drugs and physical methods under the guise of treatment, directly destroying people’s nervous systems. This doesn’t cure normal people into health but instead turns them into the mentally ill.”

Significance of the Li Yixue Case An injustice to one is a threat to all. Our concern for Li Yixue is also a defense against being dragged into psychiatric hospitals without consent. Li Yixue’s fate has captured widespread concern and stands as a landmark event in contemporary Chinese history. The light sparked by Li Yixue will not be extinguished, for it represents the continuation of a sacred torch passed down through generations—a testament to universal civilization burning in the hearts of contemporary Chinese people.

Lawyers of the Chinese Human Rights Lawyers Group January 4, 2025