釐清LI幣爭議：投資目的與反賊圈的自我反思

我認為李老師根本沒必要回應網上那些質疑，因為這些質疑大多數也沒有買幣。你沒有買幣也就算不上投資人，那你就沒有對公司經營的話語權。即便你買了，買了一點，股權少到忽略不計，雖然可以對公司經營有話語權，但是否有決定權還是要看是不是大多數股東的意見。

如果你購買了李老師的LI幣，那麼你算是投資人。但是你投資的目的是什麼，你作為投資人本身應該清楚，對你投資的標的也應該清楚。你投資LI幣是因為看好LI幣，以後可以分紅麼？顯然不是，因為迷因幣本身不提供分紅機制。那麼你是為了炒作此幣，透過高拋低吸套利麼？這種可能性是有的，我想幣圈裡購買LI幣的大多出於這種目的。但是，這種利用市場價格機制的高拋低吸是市場行為，我想這類投資者應該是在入市前非常清楚這一點的。這就是為什麼LI幣發行後快速衝高，而後迅速回落。因為這類投資者就是炒啊，賺一波就跑是最好的策略。擊鼓傳花，最後站在高點的只能怪自己運氣不佳，怪不得誰。一個有實際企業經營的利潤做錨的股票價格尚且難以預測，你還指望一個連分紅機制都沒有的迷因幣價格穩定可期？

排除了上面說的這些投資者，剩下買LI幣的，我想就是純粹出於支援李老師的目的（或者還有在支援李老師的同時透過高拋低吸套利的目的，但是主要目的還是為了給李老師捧場，支援李老師）。這類投資者事實上應該叫做贊助者。因為他們並不關心買入的這個LI幣以後是否會帶來收益，對他們來說，買LI幣就是捐款給李老師。我想出於這種目的買入LI幣的人也絕不會批評李老師發迷因幣這個事情。

綜上所述，李老師沒有必要向沒有買幣的人做出過多解釋。而買幣的人，無論出於何種目的，也不應該對李老師的發幣行為做出批評。

李老師應該注意的點就是在介紹LI幣的時候不要對LI幣的未來價格做出什麼預期和承諾——就是他媽的愛買不買！沒誰刀架在你們脖子上讓你們買的。而且，最好向公眾明說，作為一個反共團隊，維持經營已經很難，想要盈利更是遙遙無期。且無論從機制還是意願上，未來都不存在分紅的可能性。你們有能力透過炒幣賺錢你們就炒，炒虧了自己默默承受就好了。畢竟咱們迷因幣本身就沒分紅這個機制。

所以，一個沒有分紅機制的虛擬貨幣，發行本身募捐的意義更大，或者說，純粹就是為了募捐的——你想支援反共事業？我這裡有一個機會，你要捐麼？至於高拋低吸，那是贊助人（捐款者）之間玩的遊戲。李老師能告訴你們我近期不打算拋就已經是對炒幣的這部分人最大的善意了。

反賊圈需要透過此事來自我反思。是不是在圈子裡存在著見不得別人好的心理？是不是自己沒有做大做強的勇氣和魄力？最近這股批評李老師的風潮讓我想起了郭德綱當年被相聲圈攻擊孤立的事情。郭德綱：“原來我就像甄嬛一樣，誰都想弄死我；現在我就像wifi，誰都想蹭我。”從這點來說，這些沒有想清楚的反賊這次是堅定的站在了中共的一邊。

中共最怕的是什麼？是怕反賊們做大做強——人員眾且金錢多。

參考閱讀：《Meme Coin和加密貨幣的區別》

I believe that Teacher Lee has no need to respond to the online criticisms because most of these critics haven’t even bought the coin. If you haven’t bought the coin, you’re not an investor, and therefore, you don’t have the right to comment on the company’s operations. Even if you’ve bought some, if your share is negligible, while you may have the right to voice your opinion, the decision-making power still depends on the majority shareholders.

If you’ve purchased Teacher Lee’s LI coin, then you’re an investor. However, you need to understand your purpose for investing and have clarity about the asset you’re investing in. Did you invest in LI coin because you believe it will generate dividends in the future? Obviously not, as meme coins inherently lack a dividend mechanism. Then, is your goal to speculate on the coin by leveraging market fluctuations to profit through high buys and low sells? This is certainly possible, and I believe most buyers in the cryptocurrency world purchase LI coins with this intent. However, this kind of speculation is purely a market behavior, and I assume such investors are well aware of this reality before entering the market. This explains why LI coin skyrocketed after its release and then quickly fell back—because these investors are speculating. Their best strategy is to make a profit and exit. If someone ends up holding the bag at the peak, they can only blame their luck and no one else. Predicting the price of a stock backed by tangible business profits is already challenging—how could you expect price stability from a meme coin that doesn’t even offer dividends?

Eliminating the aforementioned investors, those remaining who bought LI coin, I believe, did so purely to support Teacher Lee (or to both support Teacher Lee and speculate on the coin, but their primary purpose was to show support). Such investors should more accurately be called sponsors. They don’t care whether the LI coin will bring them any returns in the future. For them, buying LI coin is equivalent to donating to Teacher Lee. I believe those who purchased LI coin with this intent would never criticize Teacher Lee for issuing a meme coin.

In summary, Teacher Lee doesn’t need to provide excessive explanations to those who haven’t bought the coin. And those who have bought it, regardless of their intent, shouldn’t criticize Teacher Lee for issuing it.

The only thing Teacher Lee should be mindful of is avoiding any predictions or promises about the future price of LI coin when introducing it—basically, "buy it if you want, or don’t, nobody’s forcing you." It’s also better to make it clear to the public that, as an anti-CCP team, sustaining operations is already a challenge, and making a profit is even more unlikely. Moreover, neither the mechanism nor the intent allows for any possibility of future dividends. If you have the ability to profit through speculation, go ahead. If you lose money, accept it quietly. After all, our meme coin inherently lacks a dividend mechanism.

Thus, a virtual currency without a dividend mechanism is more about fundraising—or purely for fundraising. It’s a chance for those who want to support the anti-CCP cause. If you’re willing to donate, here’s your opportunity. As for speculation and high buys/low sells, that’s a game between sponsors (donors). Teacher Lee already telling you that he doesn’t plan to sell in the near term is the greatest kindness to those speculating.

The Fanzei community needs to use this incident for self-reflection. Is there a mentality within the community that resents others’ success? Is there a lack of courage and determination to grow stronger? The recent wave of criticism against Teacher Lee reminds me of when Guo Degang was attacked and ostracized by the traditional crosstalk community. Guo Degang said, "In the past, I was like a heinous criminal, and everyone wanted me dead. Now, I’m like Wi-Fi—everyone wants to piggyback on me." In this sense, these thoughtless Fanzei are firmly standing on the CCP’s side this time.

What is the CCP most afraid of? It’s afraid of Fanzei growing larger and stronger—with both people and money.